Lex Fridman - What, if any, AI system have you used in your daily life to learn? I’ve heard of different algorithms- such as python. Are they only for computers or have we achieved a new level of chi to connect “wirelessly” ... #chakra-training #ac/dc #twin flame Hi #bio rhythm

This man has a fascinating mind, thank you for this.

I appreciate the fact that you put forth the effort in providing these timestamps. Very cool. Though, I watch the entire podcast anyway.

0:34 this!

@@ZeroOskul , Your question is very hard to answer in the way you have asked it, because the list you gave are completely unrelated things. What does a bows einstein condensate and have to do with gravity? Very little to nothing! And Einstein debunk string theory. Einstein spent much of his life trying to come up with a unified theory, something like string theory, but eventually he ran into problems that could not be solved. String theory is a separate but likely parallel model to the things you have listed; and each item in the list you made has its own strengths and weaknesses. put your list makes no sense it's just a random collection of scientific terms you're trying to make sound like thing. None of them are complete models for theory of gravity or a theory of everything.

Dean Ninalga haha receptive. I see what you did there.

I'd cancel my netflix and pay for this if Lex monetised this lol

@@simonclarent3742 Careful, your inferiority complex is showing. I think if these talks do anything it's simply prove that these people are not special at all and anyone can do what they do if they just have the interest and motivation. The only person I've heard on these podcasts so far that has been on an other level was Joscha Bach, all the rest have not only shown that they're basic humans but deeply flawed humans that are no different from anyone else. I appreciate their work and contribution and everything, but no more or less than the plumber. The way you're deifying them and trying to raise yourself to the pedestal you've put them on by putting others down shows clearly that you don't feel like you'll ever measure up. If you manage to change your perspective one day you'll see these talks as inspiring because it shows that you too can do this because they show that no special intelligence or super human ability is required. Now answer this, can you even afford a plumber?

Damn, I was gonna say that. I'm the obvious comment guy. Oh well, I'm left with pointing out that: It's free. It's at our fingertips, literally. It can be LISTENED too which makes work and travel possible while still learning And Lex always wears the same outfit, seemingly.

This podcast is indeed amazing. I'd also recommend Sean Carroll's Mindscape. He's a theoretical physicist/cosmologist, and he has tons of people at the top of various disciplines as guests.

Everytime Susskind gets interviewed, a lot of questions are about Feynman. It would annoy me so much.

My exact thoughts when the Lex said this is the last question...

He is an old man! Give him a break!

very much recommend a Brian Greene's interview to Leonard S. 2 hrs of full learning...arrange the search by recent and will easily appear.

Yes

If Joe Rohan is like the Oprah for men and Lex Fridman is like the Joe Rogan of science, does this mean Lex Fridman is the Oprah of science? lol (lets not turn this into a thing)

You compare Lex to Joe???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What is your IQ? or Education level? I hope that Lex will disactive the comments because people like you make sick as a ***

@@adilarqib1347 so you're demonstrating your IQ is so low that you cannot grasp the comparison of two people who are both podcasters... wow. So sorry I "make you sick", I guess you're also fragile like a snowflake too.

@@DaveWhoa Bisou mon chouchou je t'aime. My IQ is 1/100 & very stupid. This why I collaborated with more than 250 researchers and I finished 2 masters.

@@adilarqib1347 finishing a Masters doesn't mean you don't have issues. You've clearly got issues, sorry to say.

His two books on "the theoretical minimum" are fantastic

Ahahahah

😂😂😂

@@hmdshokri he answered with a vector.. Assembler language would be warmer :):):)

hahaha rightly so

THE ULTIMATE UNDERSTANDING OF SPACE AS ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE): A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE). This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND ACTUAL IN BALANCE. Indeed, energy has/involves GRAVITY; AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, "mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL makes perfect sense. GREAT !!!!! Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND WHAT IS PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. It is PROVEN. It ALL makes perfect sense. Therefore, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. Get a good LOOK at what is THE EYE. NOW, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This ALSO explains the supergiant stars, the cosmological redshift, AND the black hole(s). "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. MAGNIFICENT !!! F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. Points are POINTS. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THINK about it ALL. Beautiful. By Frank DiMeglio

Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on gravitation BY FAR.

Yea wtf, proceeds to invent string theory

at 16 he was a plumber for his ill dad in NY. He liked physics told his dad, dad misheard him for a pharmicist, when he explained he wanted to be a physicist, his dad told him to be like Einstein.

There’s hope for me yet

@@MrKaje72 or anything you set your mind to friend.

He started so late?I don't get it

So moving what you say.. but please don't feel impeded by your "simple stay at home mum" condition.. it's so unfair "simple working dad" feel they can do almost whatever they want in life just because they have so much free time to do it, for the only reason they can always count on their wife!

@@ernesthector2451 Thank you for appreciating the importance of female nurturing. I stand for all feminine and masculine qualities equally. One doesn’t succeed without some (not all) aspects of the other.

They are awesome!

His was the first free online lecture I ever watched, I think around 2009 when I was a first year student!

I was working in a startup in Silicon Valley, and was able to take early versions of the classes in Stanford night school. the classes were mostly older engineers, some retired. Best of times.

Yes bizarrely random when a nation can produce people like the guests on this podcast - as well as people like the 45th POTUS and current members of the GOP. And their supporters. I can understand how it must be doing your head in as a political science student.

Hope you found meaning in your life.

Politics is a science? How so? Science is supposed to be steeped in truth. Politicians are 100% ADVERSE to truth. They hate it. So how can this term political science be???? They're mocking us. That's what they're doing.

Thank you Leonard, for this great interview. You inspired me a long time ago to try and understand more of modern physics. Your lectures on YT have been a great help. This interview for me is icing on the cake. Really hope you are with us for a long time to come.

Love Molly

MDMA=mc2

Weird statement considering Hawking isnt alive anymore

I Knew someone would just have to mention that fact although admittedly, I tripped over my words. I think people get what I'm getting at.

Addiction often comes from something on the inside and you might find yourself addicted to something else soon enough. Don't fool yourself that being addicted to something "positive" like doing your job or studying/working with mathematics or physics is a good thing. It really isn't.

@@Bollibompa shut up. Do you think Susskind, Reimann, Einstein, etc. became who they were because they just dabbled? Or do you think they were addicted?