Could you invite Dean Radin to your podcast?

Thank you for sharing this conversation.

@@zesanurrahman6778 Moors law was invented by Intel as a "roadmap" to keep investors happy as they achieved milestones. Standard industry practice, but not an actual law of the universe

Is the impulse for computer scientists to talk about cellular automata an emergent phenomenon?

Lex, there is a little talked of model of the universe in which the big bang and the steady state universe from quantum fluctuation are both true reasons for everything we see in our universe. have you studied this model at all.

💯❤

Amen

James Lindsay is viewing this phenomena as the second enlightenment where knowledge has gone from a feudalist style institutional distribution (Eric weinsteins GIN) to an actual free market place of ideas where anyone can access them. Great time to be alive

Yeah and be forced to take a dangerous vaccine every 6 months. We live in a utopia.

Those of us that matter listen.

Alternative hypothesis: he is fully cognizant. Ample evidence seems to exist.

THANK YOU. AND I DIDNT EVEN SAY ANYTHING THAT SMART .

@@kraykray9585 I had GPT3 tell me "The one who knows will care for the one who cares, who knows" or something to that affect, I deleted it because I felt paranoid. You just reminded me of it!

@@theelementair96 Who is GPT3? What I meant is people need to hold an open mind. By saying "those of us" I was referring to people that don't swallow the pill we are being force fed. "Those of us" think before they act.

I like to keep a notebook besides me while listening. I catch something, freeze it, jolt it down. Google it up and start scribbling notes then continue on, pressing play and listening/watching the podcast.

​@@bettysue8671you're basically studying the podcast, not just listening to it😂

There's just one universe. You definitely did not listen :D

Lol. Sure.

@@jamesbarlow6423 I wonder why people as yourself make the effort to give such low level responses. Is it arrogance? Is it low awareness level? 🤔

@@JD-ev3po . If you really believe this type of pop pablem resembles a doctorate or even master'svlevel "class" I genuinely pity your compulsively enhanced ignorance. (American, ryt?😂)

@@JD-ev3po Computational irreducibility

@@maziusclavo8021 Interesting. Could you elaborate?

It does look that way, looking from outside of the matrix. :)

Too bad that both are computational, Stephen will always be one step away.

@@punksk8a29 Indeed! At least maybe he can send an email there with his universal computational language.

If he one day simply goes missing .... OTOH, maybe those running the matrix decide to simply tweek his algorithms or simply replace him with a similar Stephan Wolfram.

This should be the top comment.

I've stopped watching most of lex's content after seeing him sink into the beast that joe rogan has become. Those of us maturing past rogan's new antics are looking for the type of nonsense that wolfram spouts -- not the pure insanity the jre has fallen into

@@Hyperbolic_G why bring Rogan into this?

If Lex is just becoming one of Joe's lackeys meant to captivate the fleeing listeners, I don't want to be part of it. You can see it happening

@@Hyperbolic_G ight bro

@@Hyperbolic_G I agree with you, the only thing we're missing now is a serious primatological, biopsychosocialogical deep-dive into the fluid dynamics of chimp balls.

Agree.

Totally agree. If all the teaching a person gets is dumbed down to a young child's level, their brain might be comfortable and happy with not having to work, but they will never grow. Growth requires challenge. [Edit: fixed a spelling error.]

I love how he tries to get them to spill the beans on what they know yet can't tell 😈

​@@alanberg7414wrong

Made me laugh!

READ ISN'T ANY BETTER, take it as it comes... Take line any line divide into three, pick the two closest cuts (.333333. or real time , .333+.333+.334=) move forward , this is now new line easy peezy...

@@loveistheonlything3626 me 2

with both nostrils. What a RUSH!

Good one lol☝️

👏👏👏😎

And too many interruptions that switch to another topic

@@Petrov3434 yeah exactly, so jarring how he randomly diverts the flow. Lex is best when his is just smiling silently with his stoner eyes

I disagree. I think he's better than you can ever give him credit for. You and your 149 amend

I'm 1 h in and I think this by far the best one, its kind of coming togheter in a way we hoped. Even if it wouldn't be true it is absolutly interesting as a philosofy. I tough think its a lot to it.

​​@@Myrslokstoklex has a ton of interviews which are great. The moment I find one I love, I find another I love just as much!!! I try to get others to watch with me lol but most don't care, or see the lovely juicey secrets these people spill inbetween the lines in their context. Or love the fear in their eyes when they want to broach something yet resist and try to answer yet in a jumble of word salad so to cover their butts. I can sense the fear and love it for some odd primal reason. I watch their body language not just listen...

You are the type of person I would love to meet in life. Good for you, keep being curious!​@@bettysue8671

Wow! I think he leaves much to be desired. He’s able to get good guest. (Some awful guests too. Aliens and Stanford UFO guys who get isotopes they can’t explain. ) Good example here. He’s trying and confusing the 2nd law of thermodynamics with randomness.

@@robertlunn3678 Wow, I didn't know he was interviewing Alien's. Which episode is that ?

@@robertlunn3678 I guess you are probably right, but have to think the whole thing over for while. There seem to be brilliant ideas in his roller-coater ride through all kind of scientific disciplines & even if it all turns out to be nonsense, I like how he tries so hard to get his head out of the box.

@@robertlunn3678 basically he isn't good enough at engineering to have fun doing engineering :P that's why he does media

Solution: Ask him to stop poking you in the eye.

What happens if every "intelligent" living creature stops observing... Will reality cease to exist?

@@whannabi ...unless all the observing agents were already present but just not in human form yet...

@@FuraficFark Reality itself is its own conscious observer. So no, it doesn't cease to exist because it's observing itself more and more as time passes, and it has always observed itself since it started existing. It started to exist in order to observe itself.

I feel like I know exactly what he’s saying bc I’ve thought this before at the age of 9 or something 😆 I swear to god , I have this one theory that planets are just atoms at large scale and that’s why our concept of time is warped and this is why infinite multiverse whatever the fuck theory is truly prevalent , which is why I question why we give care to much attention to meaningless things in life . That’s my frustration with this all

Fking same lmao Going to sleep rn

Agreed Sir, It's wild to consider that while most of us sit in cubes and have meaningless 'careers' just trying to pay the bills, someone is deeply thinking about these things.

@@schuey999 totally!

And I thought I was being crazy doing this. The sleep quality isn't as good though, as you're analyzing the conversation at some level even during the sleep.

@@stanzapalny2123 Yes, that’s true. But it is very interesting.

​@@SiriusSphynxi think he also passed the "mark all squares with traffic lights" test ;)

The last one was so good I listened to it three times.

DAVID SINCLAIR

He is mindblowing! It literally expanded my brain and consciousness!

@@Constantinesis specifically if you listen to it in x2 speed

@@fraktalv If you want to prove something then try Jonathan Gorard at 2x speed :)))

This podcast is so fucking dense, i'm learning new words.

Ppl without e you w your rootowow toupee Ritter you eo IPO teep Oqo pretty 0p0 pop per PGu off

49:49 I have compiled a fundamental model of consciousness, to read it google 7-11 model of consciousness, there's a free PDF available + articles online, about a 19 page read. Agree with your comment 100%

Wolfram is also really good at explaining. He has a podcast where he explains science questions to kids at his company channel. And business and start up advice.

When I was 15 I read the Wolfram book a "new science" I could understand only 20% but it was great.

@@mytelevisionisdead ?

@@theShneeg it’s a subreddit for people that pretend to be intellectuals. I think that he’s calling out op, but it doesn’t really fit

@@mytelevisionisdead If you're going to try to meme, at least make sure you understand what it is you're doing

Perfectly summed up

the fact that you summed up this 3+ hour quasi-symposium about understanding some of the most fundamental concepts in the universe to taking a bunch of acid….. idk man i feel sorry for you..

He's the broadest thinker in the world and of incredible depth. Nassim Nicholas Taleb thought of him as the smartest man.

The first two are awesome. This one is amazing so far an hour in.

🤣🤣🤣

Hahahahaha, I am still on the re-watching process!🤣

However "small" you imagine your Plank atoms/units, where measurability ends... the idea of discontinuous discreteness presupposes and exists in the reality of continuous measuring.

I dont understand a word you said....damn I'm dumb.

@@MyTardisGoWhoosh He said something like the difference in size between the universe and an hydrogen atom is ridiculously small compared to the difference in size between an hydrogen atom and an atom of space. To magnify an atom of space to the size of an hydrogen atom you would need to multiply the size of the atom of space by the differences in size beetween and hydrogen atom and the universe almost two times.

@@eruiluvatar236 does that mean theirs infinite amount of universes?

@@MyTardisGoWhoosh Yes I believe so.

has enough disciplined learning to remember enough to talk freely of seemingly complex subject matter... and will eventually be proven wrong.lol

​@@gladeloy3341why?

Lex seems contemptuous or bored

I think this would the the equivalent of time dilation for the brain system and our mind's sequentialisation attempts. Time dilation of computational systems appears like a wide reaching phenomena

When you are young, the days are short and the years are long. When you are older, the days are long and the years are short.

@@gladeloy3341 though often true-- i have also experienced something like the opposite, or essentially, in later yrs, time becoming extraordinarily stretched out, partly due to difficulty, but also learning and trying to make up for lost time when young. So i think this is variable among ppl, and can be manipulated by us, if we're willing to, let's say, really explore things in ourselves, really do the real inventory around early 40's, and rebuild the engine if necessary. Those typical time experiences w/ age, are not universal, and that is the most interesting thing really, ie variability among us.

It explains so much, I had a realisation that maybe sleep/dreams are when we update/build our next level us. Thats why they are so bizarre with splashes of memories in crazy order. I've had so many ideas every time I listen to this podcast. We are watching the next einstein revolution i think.

It’s good, but have you heard of the Abrahamic religions? Less theoretical and more absolute truth. Makes it a superior theory of everything.

sir, is it just your spontaneously formulated opinion, or they say like this?

I think he has great questions, but I wished he asked them one at a time. I think a series of questions can be confusing or interrupting to the guest

Eloquently written comment.

Skip the math and study philosophy, that's where his work is heading anyways. The mathematical framework for these sorts of concepts is kind of clumsy anyways. Plus, much of this stuff has already been learned and understood by humans over the ages, you just have to find the translations and relearn it.

They used to be called debates.

Guests might tend to avoid confrontation. Just watch Foucault vs Chomsky debate for example

@@richarddevenezia8186 Debates are a trash medium

Yes, let's introduce ego and fear because that will improve th...oh no, don't bother.

He's so smart I didn't understand 90% of the podcast.

@@Misanthrope84 That must have been a long 3.5 hours.

@@DrDress it certainly was for me, holy shit.

he sounds like a priest in a church, lot of words which can mean pretty much anything. like corporate gibrish slang. Maybe you'll say I am stupid and probably I am but he is not good in explaining. read comments, people dont get half of what he is talking about. he might be super smart but his explanations are vague

@@straaths sometimes men can be geniuses but poor teachers. There are middle school math teachers who could teach algebra better than Einstein. He’s simply a genius who’s a bad teacher.

The most interesting thing, I think, is that he essentially describes the breakthrough DMT experience in his description of moving through rulial space, in that your experience of all portions of reality begins to vary wildly

SAME!

I disagree. Wolfram needs to set up a few pre-explanations in order to answer questions. Lex interrupted him too much, and Wolfram is gracious and always tried to answer each interruption. This is what derailed the conversation.

Agreed!

i do this every night! Very complicated dreams where my unconcious mind is clearly smarter than my waking mind!!

its fascinating

@@DiegoRodriguez-vx6ys yeah that too 🤣

Glad i am not the only one who is so much impacted by Wolfram`s theory. Unfortunately I am trying to ask questions and start dialogues on various forums and posts but I didnt get much answers yet.

Elaborate please. Here or a blog? I find his ideas intriguing but dense and....

@Constantine, I'm with @Rajeev Gangal -- would love to hear you elaborate on this. I am trying to figure out the same... Thanks!

Good one :)

I'm assuming that this is also available in podcast form.

so to speak

It's gotta be "The Wolfman" :)

So to speak

@@gridreeves so to speak

His glory days, apparently

You can easily imagine toy universes in which characters can or cannot reach the bottom level of implementation. This means there is likely no easy answer whether our universe falls into one kind or another. And in all likelihood even thinking of the "bottom" is a parochial notion, and everything might work in ways that are not even imaginable to us now, or perhaps ever.

Yes, that's where the mystics come in. The vision at Ostia is described in Augustine's Confessions, Book IX, Chapter 10. 'She', of course, is Monica: As the day now approached on which she was to depart this life--a day which thou knewest, but which we did not--it happened (though I believe it was by thy secret ways arranged) that she and I stood alone, leaning in a certain window from which the garden of the house we occupied at Ostia could be seen. Here in this place, removed from the crowd, we were resting ourselves for the voyage after the fatigues of a long journey. We were conversing alone very pleasantly and "forgetting those things which are past, and reaching forward toward those things which are future." We were in the present--and in the presence of Truth (which thou art)--discussing together what is the nature of the eternal life of the saints: which eye has not seen, nor ear heard, neither has entered into the heart of man. We opened wide the mouth of our heart, thirsting for those supernal streams of thy fountain, "the fountain of life" which is with thee, that we might be sprinkled with its waters according to our capacity and might in some measure weigh the truth of so profound a mystery. And when our conversation had brought us to the point where the very highest of physical sense and the most intense illumination of physical light seemed, in comparison with the sweetness of that life to come, not worthy of comparison, nor even of mention, we lifted ourselves with a more ardent love toward the Selfsame [Idipsum], and we gradually passed through all the levels of bodily objects, and even through the heaven itself, where the sun and moon and stars shine on the earth. Indeed, we soared higher yet by an inner musing, speaking and marveling at thy works. And we came at last to our own minds and went beyond them, that we might climb as high as that region of unfailing plenty where thou feedest Israel forever with the food of truth, where life is that Wisdom by whom all things are made, both which have been and which are to be. Wisdom is not made, but is as she has been and forever shall be; for "to have been" and "to be hereafter" do not apply to her, but only "to be," because she is eternal and "to have been" and "to be hereafter" are not eternal. And while we were thus speaking and straining after her, we just barely touched her with the whole effort of our hearts. Then with a sigh, leaving the first fruits of the Spirit bound to that ecstasy, we returned to the sounds of our own tongue, where the spoken word had both beginning and end. But what is like to thy Word, our Lord, who remaineth in himself without becoming old, and "makes all things new"? branemrys.blogspot.com/2010/08/vision-at-ostia.html

Fall: or dodge in hell, by neal stephenson.

Wow!

and would they ask themselves, "why am i shooting this guy ?"

problem is mathematics allows for phenomena that has not been proven physically yet. example, mathematically traveling backwards in time is possible but in our reality and physics has not proven that to be true. So shit can get weird mathematically lol.

Understanding reality is grueling. It’s not his fault

Yes I was thinking this! It’s fascinating to watch the left brain try to articulate the wisdom that metaphysical teachers and ancient healers have embodied for thousands of years. Not to mention all the scientists who have been outcasted and shamed for even hinting at having metaphysical beliefs are not being proven correct.

The bigger you are the more space you cover and the more time is perceived as moving slowly

But in that the exact Problem is lying. I think of what Karl Popper said about induction - induction can be used to reason to conclusions, but induction itself is not empirically justifiable. You can almost generalize this: you can empirically justify the implications of a given theory, but you can't justify it's assumptions. So the core issue lies in the decision, which is rather belief than justified reason, if the fabric of the universe is an ideal rulesystem and human beings are able through reason and experiments to come closer to the understanding of that - or the pragmatic attitude: "knowledge of the world" is a rather a confusing statement, knowledge is only the method to practically influence the happenings of the universe. Just my 2 cents. I love discussions like that!

I think he believed it from the start... sometimes bugs me a little, but maybe you need that sort of conviction and determination to get results

I agree completely. I can sort of follow most physics discussions, but Wolfram's way of speaking like his theory IS reality realllly threw me off. I wish he would describe it like the theory that is is, instead of speaking of it as if it's proven reality.

@@rudyj8948 meh, I see no problem in that... it's not like you can't believe in what you think is correct... obviously the bigger structure (academia) doesn't suffer from any of his beliefs besides the possible retarded people who think it's disrespectful to one up the present god "standard model". This is literally the only way to move forward: Having guys that think they are correct until they prove or not that they are indeed correct.

@@iFastee that's true, but I'm not demanding that everyone subscribe to the all powerful Standard Model... However I do think it's disingenuous for him to sit in the podcast and say "this is the way the universe is". It's neither scientific nor honest in regards to what he's researching. My issue with his wording is that he has a hypothesis that he is espousing, but he's doing it in a way that uneducated people might take his words at face value and leave this video without having thought critically about his claims, or their role in the broader science.

@@rudyj8948 That's up to each listener to figure out.