Dude I was sweating all along, hahaha. Building your own language is definitely a bit more complicated than HTML, let’s say 😅

Not if you did computer construction and program analysis during your university. 🙂

I was high while watching it, 10/10 experience, would recommend

Does anyone knows the file icon theme fireship uses??

Yeah even when I had no audio for some reason

@@PefectPiePlace2 yeah also you might wanna email the author to add "rarely gets talked about except for PerfectPiePlace2, who is the first thing he mentions when talking about the subject".

GCC could be made more modular internally, for example by adding a plugin API. However, this was resisted for a long time by Richard Stallman because he was afraid it would be (mis)used to hook proprietary code into GCC and thereby evade the GPL. This allowed LLVM to get an edge in areas where GCC could not compete.

@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 Yes, it would have been used as a back stage for a commercial compiler. I don't really see that as much of a "danger" these days, since there aren't that many commercial compiler operations. Most of the ones I know of are compiler groups within organizations, that use them for special projects and optimizations (like my company does). LLVM is BSD (open license). So the point is basically moot now. LLVM is a more modern project, so I am sure some would say better, although I have heard different opinions on this matter. I personally don't use anyone else's back or front ends, I have always preferred to write my own.

@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 I thought GCC already had plugins ? Isn't the ODB compiler a GCC plugin ?

Yet another compiler compiler( yacc )?

@@mnoxman yacc does not really determine any formats (like intermediate). Its a tool.

Dude, I just googled it and found tons of results right away (but of course: fireship rocks, I agree)

We all have something like that. After sometime we find a missing fundamental piece and everything connects.

@@TheRealChiults You usually don't google everything you hear about

@@Coyannn I do

@@Coyannn point

The question is how do we become that guy who would have the technical know-how to pull that off anyway?

@@TBadalov tell me when you find out

ideas are cheap especially in CS, it's the implementation that counts.

@@utkua agreed. It's just reassuring to know it wasn't a bad idea.

@@mandemlistening6373 read the docs

> GNU Make has entered the chat. Possibly the single most versatile tool in my programming arsenal, purely because of its simplicity.

Recent.

@@ToadalChaos 'most versatile.., purely because of its simplicity' doesn't make sense. I'm sure there are more simple tools in your programming arsenal that are less versatile.

@@frydac GNU Make can automate tasks in almost any context. Agnostic of other tools, build systems, pipelines, languages, or frameworks. It has no complex dependencies or installation process (on linux, that is). Its simplicity is what allows it to be used for anything, hence its versatility. It is the only tool I've used in every project (almost) I've worked on since learning about it. I can't think of a simpler tool that approaches that level of versatility.

@@ToadalChaosthe web it is. http, html, css, js. i think there is more versatility than in GNU

I think you are lying to show yourself

@@Abdurrahman98XX Dude, In some Vietnamese Top University for Computer Science we actually have `Principle of Programming Language` course to write a compiler via 4 main steps as the video demonstrated.

@@Abdurrahman98XX i had to write a compiler as well and idk whats a lie about this - heres how we did it (we reduced step 2 and 3 in the video into a single step though): 1.) lexer (source code => list of tokens) 2.) parser (list of tokens => ast) 3.) optimization (optional) (ast => ast) 4.) generator (ast => machine code) 5.) optimization (optional) (machine code => machine code)

We also did something similar, but we were in teams by 4 people. We had to make simplified copy of Golang (without goroutines and without most of standart API missing). It was very nice project assignment, and I think every programmer should try it at least once in lifetime (doesn't matter if compiler or interpret).

@@mabed6692 which language did you use

More insane that billion dollar companies ride on the back of this software and he's not driving a Lamborghini and drinking Mei Tai's by his Olympic size swimming pool at his Malibu summer house

Chris Lattner workee at Apple for a spell (maybe he still is) he was on the Lex Fridman podcast iirc

Same with Lua language.

He is not alone. there are thousands of people contributing on LLVM.

He also created the Swift language while at Apple. Then he went to Tesla, then Google, then SiFive, and now he has started his own company Modular AI. Most of the developer community has definitely heard of him.

1 ) Parse the text to an internal IR 2 ) Transform that to LLVM IR 3) Enjoy ;) Perhaps you could help me build Nemesis and learn together! Let me know if you are interested!

nice original function keyword you got there, mr. "fu {...} ck"

Haha missed the part that it's called JeffScript 😂😂

i asked an ai to make a programming language it came up with "simpscript"

Sounds like a job interview sentence

@@mathisd who knows, he might be interviewing

@@1ycx every programer is constantly being interviewed 0_0

im doing it in highschool on my own and im suffering Its done

Always true

100 seconds* xD

these comments are so dumb. You will never get the same from a youtube video as you will from an actual university course

@@aurelia8028 you will never get the same from an university course as you will from just sitting down with pure passion and curiosity, forgetting time. that is only true way of learning. this video may spark that. a uni course is mandatory and will have the opposite effect. check yourself.

As Wasm becomes more mainstream, all this will become "web-related stuff."

@@PefectPiePlace2 I hope that changes with the next generation of web devs

@@swattalks7624 mechanics can't just know how to drive cars, they have to know how to fix it too, just using and not knowing what or why, you're just being a simple user, you're a programmer, not a user, you have to have control over the machine, not the other way around, you don't become a chef knowing how to cook cup noodles, you don't become a mechanic knowing how to change oil (English is not my mother tongue, sorry for any spelling mistakes)

@@swattalks7624 mechanics just fix cars, programmers make and fix programs

@@heraclitoqsaldanha6133 it were you who made such a stupid comparison in the first place. How many Logic classes have you slept through?

You don't understand anything because you're a web developer 😂. Web developers just use a bunch of libraries and isn't real programming, software engineers💪are the smart ones. That's why you don't understand you webdev, you're not an engineer. Average webdev: College is USELESS Average software engineer: got a degree in a 4-year university

Gatekeeping so hard!

@@steve4718 You gotta be a Jew to have that much pride.

Yet your name is @@steve4718 and you have a Clash of Clans profile picture. Starting to believe you invent a life for yourself?

@@steve4718 Tell me you are trolling

L1, L2, L2 cache is located in the cpu albeit in much smaller sizes than the main ram. Expect much higher speeds though

smaller level cache -> closer to cpu -> faster access

Probably better to make a video about the memory hierachy

@Nicholas Needham ooh yeah

@Nicholas Needham Recommend any specific ones?

why do weird things show up when I google your username

what the fuck is furryfinity

@@paulmccartney2327 ur so strange

+1 for Laravel. It's the nicest framework ever

@@kaylaroxx Laravel isn't PHP kek. The built-in tools provide abstractions over almost all of the disgusting PHP parts. It's very pleasant to work with an the ORM is the best I've seen.

@@kaylaroxx Raw PHP is garbage but working with Laravel is a breeze. I mostly prefer Laravel over JS frameworks on my project.

@@kaylaroxx your mom

@@kaylaroxx yikes, at my job we always use the latest and greatest.

Why?

Dude what you exactly did you figure out ? Just curious

@@Supergecko8 Not the original author, here's what I think he was getting at: Ruby allows for rich runtime reflection, making it difficult* to compile Ruby to efficient machine code ahead of time. Crystal imposes additional constraints on values through its type system that reduce the runtime flexibility of the language in exchange for knowing the types of all values ahead of time, meaning efficient machine code can be generated. This flexible-rigid dynamic-static tradeoff is why Crystal is compiled while Ruby generally isn't. *Just-in-time (JIT) compilers for Ruby, like YJIT, compile Ruby to native code at runtime. JIT compilers run alongside your program, keep track of the types of values, and emit snippets of native code once types are fully known at a point (based on other heuristics too, mainly centered around whether the compilation overhead is worth it).

Damn. I should have studied computer science in college to understand all of this.

@@DK-ox7ze don't worry I did, some curriculums might teach you about compilers but I still don't know much about them. You can still learn this stuff online if it really interests you tho

Interesting I used GNU Flex and Bison while at college. Does ANTLR do both lexing and parsing?

@@AlexanderSuraphel yes, you just have to define a grammar and ANTLR generates a Lexer and Parser

@@martinbeltrandiaz Thanks I'll try it out

I would say it is closer to an unviersal assembly language

Yes, however IR is in SSA form and contain PHI nodes (which is not executable as-is)

Perhaps also ships with all modern browsers for WebGL?

this sheesh is not easy to understand lmao

@@jardondiego Agree. I bet he didn't understand other than installing it.

@@jardondiego if u already know compiler design or about compilers, the steps he mentioned are not hard to understand. For newbies, yes . It will be hard.

I don't get it. Are you talking about errors when you create LLVM IR or what?

I think there is no real difference outside human readability preference and the language's ecosystem. Most differences in high-level structuring are whittled down to the same dust in the IR optimization phase nowadays. Of course, the less junk you write in your high-level code, the more refined your machine code will be.

You're basically an expert In LLVM now! I should do the same.

👑

lol

Bruh

I just made a compliler for js and pythoh that can handle that can even compile all sorts of frameworks and libs.. thanks for great tut 🤠 only took 100 sec

Now let's port TypeScript to LLVM

@Pavel Alexandru the problem is condensing everything into 100 seconds and presenting it in a concise fashion

Yo, I don't think this video is a good source for learning python as your first. Good luck.

@@elmiraguth its about his other programming language videos genius.

@@xCwieCHRISx Then why is it a comment under this video lol?

@@elmiraguth I don't think it's about his other videos specifically, but his videos in general. "your videos give me a better idea of [...] what programing languages are". Even if you are just writing a JIT compiled language like Python, understanding that it is still compiled is useful. Understanding how compilation happens is also useful.

@@elmiraguth I agree with both yeet and Xcwei

Minus the fake "crafts" that rarely work, and when they do, they are useless

What Arjix said --> 100% Here, we end up with knowledge instead of garbage.

@@DevranUenal lol no one's becoming knowledgeable about anything in 100 seconds, sorry.

@@nateo7045 maybe you have different definitions. When I don’t know something, then look it up and get an answer/obtain knowledge, what do you call that?

@@DevranUenal I looked up the definition before I commented just in case, and it means "well-informed'. 100 seconds might introduce you to a concept, but you're going to be far from knowledgeable about it. Anyway, I'm just nitpicking.

In the mean time, watch David beazly's presentation on ply.. not llvm, but quite interesting still

That's what you do when you take a compilers course

And he is trying to replace Python with his new programming language Mojo.