@stets uninu I disagree.

@@asa.8691 desu

C'mon guys, everybody knows you can't disrespect bacon.

If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.

There's nothing I'd like more than watching Magnus Carlsen at Magnus Carlsen's youtube channel: Magnus Carlsen :)

Lmao and yes!

True

How dare he.

i think he can play a bit

Lmaoo

The ceiling is the secret of the universe

yea man, like if he didn't explain, we would have never known

many people ask him how its like for him

the ceiling is simply to hold them up

He has 160iq i bet he thinks everyone else is a wall

The games were designed by Kasparov.

@@EGarrett01 no they werent lmfaoooo, the games were ANALYSED BY KASPAROV, however kasparov didnt make the games BUT the games were actually famous games by grandmasters replayed here but not kasparov for sure as levy explained. They got kasparov to check the validity.

@@amdhacker7225 Kasparov literally has a video on his official youtube channel called "How I designed the games for the Queen's Gambit."

@@EGarrett01 bro if u search the games on queens gambit it literally says they are real games played by grandmasters not just kasparov i mean i dont think kasparov played any games in queens gambit.

fr

Majority of the moved were from a real game up until the end.

They copied known GM games, so having good games is no great feat.

yeah, it's not like there are books with full chess games and plays ikr

​@@westerling8436 It's almost like you are sarcastic at a simple positive assertion given by Kwigs to the production quality of the show having authentic chess moves replicating real matches. Or just being ignorant, now that I think about it, it seems your both. IKR

@@letsplayblis1115 typical chess fan talk haha

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/hJd0mXinh6Whz40.html Carlsen's stream was the funniest stream yet

He should be ashamed of himself :D

After that ridiculous draw offer, magnus has a point lmao

This made me laugh out loud for several seconds (The comment)

Borgov blundered when he smiled

Savage

HAHAHAA TROLOLOLOL

BDSM?

of course

Who is the biggest chess troll of all? lol

I know. Facts are cruel.

the majority of people probably really didn't know who magnus was, since queen's gambit was a lot of people's first intro into chess. but magnus is definitely a cool dude. there's a vid of him playing bullet at a college bar and taking the time to compliment the other kid's playing 😎😎

​@@shoe_gazeif queen's gambit was ur first intro to chess then u probably shouldn't be watching this video

​@@mosesseun2746 no way u play chess and aren't aware of queen's gambit impact on the game 🫵😹 🫵😂

ppl who don't play chess have no clue who he is.

@@brunoescoto9630 people who dont interest in chess perhaps dont watch this movie either

kinda cringe bro

Lol same

That's called being a prick

I dont know u but I reeeeally really hate players like u, why do u even do that man. Everytime I got spamed with draw offers when he is left with -13 material. Accept your loss and learn from it, stop being a child.

@@houssemamami4359 exactly, so annoying

Savage

Yes... a fictional character that didn't play as any chess player has ever played that got him in that position in the first place... Yes, very accurate...

Pitiless MC!! 8-))

@@jdderew1 Considering the game was created by Kasparov, I think it's not as bad lol It has to find the balance of being real enough, without actually having the filler moves of real games, so if you have a problem with it take to Garry.

@Sam Chak ok sam chak

It’s like having an F1 themed movie produced by Ayrton Senna.

yes he did! Kasparov was a consultant on the show. apparently they even considered him for the role of Borgov!

@@Felyxx I’d absolutely watch that

@@Felyxx getting one produced by lewis hamilton pretty soon

@Badr4sta I know, I just hope he's going to keep it about the racing and not all the woke crap he's been into lately. Don't have anything against the guy and I'mm sure he couldn't care less, I'm just not into his style.

@Anna Svidler cause deep down u know you are better, you can do better, and you’re mostly angry at yourself.

Lol LMFAOO

LMAO relatable

That's just Magnus' opinion. But frankly I think he's a bit too into it, winning and losing and taking it well isn't exclusive to any sport, it goes for anything in life.

@@kallekallessons "taking it well" is subjective. It's childish and pointless to be angry at your opponent but being angry at yourself can make you improve.

This comment deserves more likes

They hired Garry Kasparov, no wonder the chess is outstanding

@El paco not just a chess player bro.

@@AmplifyChris All the games in the series are just historical that games that someone picked from the database.

@@drewjenkins2318 And thank goodness they actually made the effort. I mean, imagine if movies involving any type of coding or hacking tried half as hard?

or like Messi saying the football scenes were pretty good in a movie

@@UKSponge360 or like Caravaggio saying the painting scenes were pretty good in the movie.

Or like hitler said the war scenes were really good in a movie

@@lucaketterer7582 ayooo💀💀💀💀💀

Well they got Garry Kasparov to personally prepare the games for them. It would be embarasing if the games were no good.

no he should be ashamed

he smiled because he's thick af

@@mike365fly ❄️❄️

😊

@@emirakar4864 😂😂

Hikaru strats

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

SF with NNUE

That was pretty weird tho

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rGV6roV4oHhlxok.html Carlsen Naka rivalry explained

Right!! it's exactly how they described her playing style in the show

"Which she has every right to do..." :-) Savage... ;-)

I think you also need to account for how comfortable Magnus is as a player. He cannot see everything about every situation, but he is remarkable to see a position and be positive that the position contains no unknowns. There are many examples where he is surprised that he is the only person in the world to sees something "obvious" in a position. I think his rating would be even higher if he understood the blind spots of others more.

Also when he mentioned that the chess board was in her head and not on the ceiling.. I really thought she was visually seeing the board. I'm such an idiot!

@@ThatAboutDoesIt given when she first moved into the house with her adopted parents, she needed to rip a hole in the fabric over the top of the board so she could see the ceiling and thus the chessboard... I think she actually was supposed to be seeing things visually on the ceiling. The fabric obscured her view - so she ripped it - a pretty unambiguous sign that she was visualising things literally, not metaphorically.

Simp

What is this show? Feminist propaganda? Remember what Bobby Fischer said about women chess players.

@@joebloggs5679 I also remember what he said about Jewish people

@@koifish528 he spoke facts. And that's why he was defamed. That clan of devils in the guise of a religious people have been kicked out of over 100 places over 2000 years and when a certain Austrian saved Germany from their clutches, they started another world war using international influence and after they destroyed Germany, they created a hoax that has stopped anyone ever questioning them again.

@@koifish528 LMAO

maybe if he swallowed a handful of strange green pills

Savage😂

Chess is incredibly boring and he doesn't even want to be the champion anymore. He's been doing this for such a long time, he probably just wants to make money off of it and retire, and I say good on him. No one has even come close to how good he is.

​@@trendybistro not really true, some players have come fairly close. both WC matches with Karjakin and Caruana were drawn in the classical portion (12 games each - 12 draws with Caruana, 1 win 1 loss and 10 draws against Karjakin), he beated them on rapid tiebreaks. don't take my word for it though - it's Carlsen himself who said (in 2018) that "in classical chess he [Caruana] has at this point just as much right as I to call himself the best in the world". besides, Carlsen forfeited the WC match, but he intends to keep on playing professionally / competitively, clearly he's not ready to abandon the "incredibly boring" chess just yet.

@@trendybistro he wasn't bored... it was just because he was a champion he had to prepare for a long period to defend his title and restrict himself from playing other tourments..and it was alot of stress and "boring" since it was not worth for him to play against one person after a long period... he is still playing in tournaments... chess is intense.. play blitz if you feel bore.

@@trendybistro "Chess is incredibly boring" You do know there's a neat little thing called opinions right? Even if you think chess is boring it's not like others are gonna think the same. Also he's not tryna make money off of it, cause if he was he would've had his twitch subs on. He's just having fun with it

I too was laughing when he Said that 😂

Magnus > Borgov

@@CapJackSparrow98 yup😂

@@seanlawless8711 ofcourse

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rGV6roV4oHhlxok.html Carlsen Naka rivalry explained

That separates them from their mediocre peers. Intelligent but stuck in their own world not attuned to the reality of things.

taylor joy and beth harmon, translating it to the real world, helped more to real Carles than Carlsen itself to the Serie. After this serie Chess went up and the tournamens surely did increase their prizes. I understand your position but it is not like "Magnus is supporting the serie", for me it is like "Serie is supporting chess and in consecuence to Magnus too". Do you get my point?

@@skallittor5478 I don't even know if your point was typed in English. So no, I don't understand any point you were trying to make. But what's important is that you made yourself feel smart

what part you did not understand?@@jimmyrodriguez5670

can you elaborate further?@@risingforce9291

Knight I assume

@@thegoggstaryup

@@thegoggstar Yes, Knight to square e6. The "K" notation is reserved for the King piece.

@@JudgeSim Thanks

i just checked ur fide stats and my guy you are a serious chess player

Without further ado

Sorry about that

And it was in this position that Borgov resigned the game, as there is nothing more to be done here.

Captures captures captures

Hello Antonio

shut up

Hi Gotham!

*pawn e3*

me too

Still hasn't been changed yet haha

Thats funny 😀😀😀

Nah I think they played it in a way that makes sense. They had all the lines played out for her to win, but he chose one they had not considered which left her uncertain. Though she is better in this situation, he has already demolished her twice before and she is afraid that he sees something they did not. If not for her “superpower analysis” she may have accept the draw out of fear.

@@williamestey7294 oh thats a good point

@@williamestey7294 thankfully, as Hikaru said, she is not Anish Giri.

@@williamestey7294 Are you joking?? She was very close to winning. Nobody, even amateur players would accept a draw from that position. Lol

He's being a good sport.

yeah i laughed so bad at that (7:23 btw)

@@koga-roblox2280 me too xdddd

I laughed in this part 🤣

Meanwhile magnus flips out when he loses.

What made you say he's humble? Genuinely curious, bc I've seen lots of his interview, funny guy, but I definitely wouldn't use the word humble to describe him. Thanks, if you'll answer

⁠​⁠@@skittles2 He is respectful, honest, praising his opponents when they do well. And in the clips where he can seem cocky he is lowkey being funny while at the same time being honest. He is in fact much better than everyone else

Yes, a great world champion and ambassador for the game.

I like how he did his analysis but I wish he had a board to show the game instead of just the clips from the series because it was hard for me, a bad player, to understand :)

Agreed. Hopefully Borgov can learn from Carlsens analysis

@@cosmospanda7727 there are some other videos explaining the game like ukposts.info/have/v-deo/p3l-lYqChpB4jmw.html

@@BedroomPianist Well, that game was in 1968 - even if Netflix does a sequel, and they meet again, maybe in 1970 or so, keep in mind that Carlsen was only born in 1990.

chess comes before all

i cant 😭😭🤚🏼🤚🏼🤚🏼

He clearly is more intelligent, than these covid-sheeps.

@@katik4208 Ewwww a Covid denier

@@TheShanicpower i think its satire (hope)

Depends, sometimes you kan simply turn a rook upside down, but if theres spare pieces you can use these ofcourse

People have estimated that a high level GM might have memorized north of 100,000 chess patterns in the brain. I think MC certainly is one of these.

The problem with chess at this level is that there are not really not many positions possible, most players play always the best/2nd best position on every move, so in the long run it's not that hard to learn the patterns. (for them of course, for mere mortals it is not) and since most have a repertoire they stick with, they start to learn every outcome since almost every time people will play the best move to answer his, and if they don't he will punish, that's why so many games end in draw at classic, with time to think the game is basically a matter of who wants to risk playing something unusual vs sticking to the end in the main line of that variation and drawing.

The computers are the only ones that get creative in chess

​@@marcosc9130 chess PATTERNS are not the same thing as concrete move sequences. there are thousands and thousands of ways in which every pattern can occur, and of course these patterns are usually combined, so an experienced player will break a given position down into several discernible patterns. that's what makes blindfold chess possible. that's more or less how our brains (and in modern times, artificial inteligence) are able to quickly recognize and decipher hand writing, for instance - by extracting the crucial patterns out of the overall complexity. for someone like Kaspar Hauser, who's illiterate and never learned to read and write, it would be nothing short of magic.

Wellt his game _WAS_ designed by Garry Kasparov himself

Imo, you can't say it's not. It's part of the series. All details in all films should be open to interpretation and critical observation as the viewer likes. The point of that scene may not strictly be about the chess, but you can't say that it completely isn't.

@@ianism1103 theres always this one guy 🤣🤣🤣

@@ianism1103 you literally made zero sense

@@ianism1103 how can someone forget how to laugh?

@@ianism1103 it's a *J O K E*

It will soon

@@WetNoodle154 and again in 7 years lol

@@nhrunner !remindme 7 years :)

it hitted for me

just hit :)

What?

This video is also being posted in official Netflix accounts. So unfurtionally there are a lot of people who watched the show, but who don't know who he is yet.

I am sure not everyone knows him

@@alenciaga21 you may be right on that

Well, this 2020 has brought a lot more of attention to chess, there's a lot of new people who don't know too much about chess, I'm pretty sure They'll be Impressed Carlsen's level

@Anna Svidler There are situations where great chess players smiled after a loss but Magnus is right not after offering a joke of a draw. (which I never would've realized just watching the show without knowing the analysis and having the board)

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rGV6roV4oHhlxok.html Carlsen Naka rivalry explained

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rGV6roV4oHhlxok.html Carlsen Naka rivalry explained

Maybe he just wanted to trick his opponnet to accept the draw

I think he smiled because there was a part of him that was relieved to be removed from a cog in the Soviet machine as the world's most invincible chess player

It really is though. Magnus spittin facts

He thought process after that was "is there a trap here? No."

"Do your best and always remember : losing is dying, there is absolutely no point in just participate."

@@FujikiFr He is not talking about losing, but about the unsportsmanlike draw offer

@@btonasse I know. But he also desperately hates losing.

@@FujikiFr "Winning isn't everything ... winning is the only thing."

@Fujiki Geno yeah! I don't understand how can the kids be poor

It's a limited series. There won't be a next season.

@@ozonejgs2887 why?

@@SuperLari1234 dont really see whats the point of another season. They basically did everything they could in one season from her childhood to starting her career to her mum dying to depression to you know the end winning it all. All you can do is her winning more or just doing the same thing again with her breaking down.

@@SuperLari1234 it’s also based off a book, which doesn’t have a sequel at the moment

@@SuperLari1234 What do you mean, why? Because it is, dude. That's probably what was signed off on. Besides, the story ended in a perfect place. Beth Harmon's arc as a character is complete. Anything else would be cyclic and unnecessary. Perhaps Netflix could experiment with a completely new chess IP. Maybe a biopic on a player such as Paul Morphy, and his famous 1858 trip to Europe? But the Queen's Gambit is not a series that needs a continuation.

No, I am the Chess Master

@@eaglesandowls No, I am the Chess Master

Hi crossfire player here?

That's because they hired Kasparov to do it for them, they would go for absurd games as always, but Kasparov told them not to and personally helped create games that were both real enough, but not like stupid long and boring like a real championship match. Specially because back then games were a little more wild, since players didn't train with 3000 rating Engine since they are kids. Some people say they should have used real matches, but for the average person watching a game with 180 moves with a lot of depth is not feasible, imagine fitting 10% of the reason why the Najdorf is played that way. Or worse, translating the rather uninteresting "Queen's Gambit", very safe, very positional and making it exciting.

I dont think speaking another language is a big deal. And the games were selected based on real good games, so they are interesting.

​@@marcosc9130 "they would go for absurd games as always, but Kasparov told them not to" The fact that they hired Kasparov is by itself evidence that they DIDN'T want to go for absurd games, and that decision must have been made BEFORE he could tell them that (since he hadn't been hired yet). by the way it was Kasparov + Pandolfini, if i remember correctly. "Some people say they should have used real matches, but for the average person watching a game with 180 moves with a lot of depth is not feasible" i think you mean real games (not matches), and no, actual games aren't typically 180 moves long either. the actual game it was based on was a 72 moves draw (between Ivanchuk and Wolff), which was spiced up and converted into a 53 moves win, arguably adding MORE depth to it, as the actual game avoided complexities, exchanged most pieces and this was exactly why it took longer and ended in a draw. and the 72 moves that original game lasted - while far from 180 - was still pretty long by tournament standards. as evidenced by the fact that for Ivanchuk was actually the 2nd longest game (out of 13) he played in that tournament, and for Wolff the longest one. so whatever speaks against using real life games in TV, it's not their length as you imply. not to mention there's obviously no reason to show every single move on the screen - even a game consisting of 100+ moves could still be narrowed down to just the interesting parts for cinematic purposes.

In Europe it's normal to speak more than one language, heck, most people speak three or four languages.

​@@theseeker3073 not just in Europe, I don't understand why the U.S thinks speaking a second language is amazing and a sign of intelligence or something. proper English with punctuations and being grammatically correct is the hardest thing for me.

😂😂😂😂

Next time you're watching one you can say "he shouldn't have smiled there, he should be ashamed of the way he handled that situation"

Carl Friedrich Gauss made a similar remark in his later years that nothing in life is greater than kindness.

Lool

Life.. finds a way

It has no sense

@@diegobompiedi1999 Why can't you take a (beep) joke?

@@LeventK it is not a (beep) joke bro

magnus would crash her

Magnus would stomp her into the ground.

Oh hey Jozarov great to see you here!

@@ss9392 Really Impressed by Magnus in this video

"popularized again"? when did it fall out of popularity?

@@vibovitold maybe they meant for the younger people. cuz i sure as hell dont see a lot of kids talking about chess

@@mangomaniac3331 young people play more chess and talk about it more than older people

@@mangomaniac3331 you're hanging with wrong kind of young people

@@vibovitold I mean I learned chess because of the queen’s gambit, it inspired many people to learn how to play

lololololololol

They sponsored the video lmao

Imagine your imagination is true but not for this video, instead for a video before Magnus Carlsen's video.

Very funny 🤪🤪🤪 not cringe comment at all 😂😂😂 lots of lol (lots of laughter) 🤣🤣🤣

Imagine imagining an imagination

So true... 🤣🤣🤣

Lol nice

This is underrated

lmfao

he would win. he was a gm at 13 while beth became one at 22

Magnus Carlsen probably thinks everybody have a chessboard in their head as he does so why bother editing video and adding another lol (no offence, great video anyway).

@@insanedb I saw it at the ceiling

he should show the game on a ceiling :P