@D J Indeed she is just that!

She seems like a completely different person to the prosecutor in the OJ courtroom.

Marcia Clark is a looser ! The Glove don't fit you must acquit !

Marcia was so incompetent and terrible in this case, idk why people are coming around to think she was a good woman, she let a double murderer go free.

Intelligent? Thanks to her a killer got free.

fabricio Alves racially biased low IQ jury and loads of the Juice's blood everywhere.

Cool like That-EDTA.

Says one feminazi about another. I concede "charming and articulate", but when you start talking that social justice bullshit that isn't backed up by statistics- statistics that she KNOWS prove the narrative wrong, you lose your 'intelligence' card. The LADP vs. black community thing was true, but to attribute that to the rest of the country- like Leftists do, is just ignorant.

@@PositiveMommaLife Here are some fun facts for you to ponder! The person the killed NBS was lefthanded and OJ is Righthanded. Blood that drips from a running person doesn't make perfect circles. There is no law or procedure in CA to take blood from a possible suspect of a murder and then carry the blood sample 18 miles to the suspect's home where the blood trail was found!? This entire case was based on BLOOD EVIDENCE! DNA EVIDENCE FROM BLOOD!!!

I'd totally hit it

keith stone LMAO no doubt Keith

botox?

plastic... michael jackson style

Tony Starks Maybe

She's a 3rd prosecutor; she only handles small cases now... she was given the OJ case, considered unwinnable by other more experienced prosecutors. She's milked the OJ case for decades... paid speaking engagements, book deals, TV appearances to promote her books after all these years. You think OJ was guilty? I DARE YOU to see the UKposts video, entitled "My Brother, the serial Killer," by those that weer no involved in the OJ case and have nothing to gain. SEE it to the end, you may change your opinion.

@@calicodnikonian2774 All evidence leads to OJ

Yes after she got that 4 million She was very unlikable as a lawyer

​@YoungHaveNot interesting, did she get 4 million from the case or book?

Scott Borden ironically she has a new show on a&e, I believe it premieres this Thursday!!

That's interesting. Weird how that works out sometimes. "Right" place, right time.

IDN. I like her a ton. However, I watched every day back then & the prosecution had overwhelming evidence. It was a slam dunk. They had the blood of OJ, RB & NS found in OJ's truck, and in his house, and the prosecution still got destroyed. They got hammered in the worst way so I don't think the show would go well for her if they told the truth in a series.

lol 😂 Yes ! We “BELIEVE” you !!! Not ! Hoax

He was a complete idiot.

Agreed but She and Darden were shit prosecutors too. Left out so much evidence and gave completely inadequate explanation of evidence that was admitted.

⁠@@billbuttlicker69agree that Clark and Darden messed up. They should have introduced evidence in the Bronco chase. They should have hammered home the uniqueness of the DNA evidence that is attributable to Simpson only. And they shouldn’t have asked Simpson to try on the bloody glove. That being said, Ito deserves the largest share of the blame. He failed to control the courtroom. He allowed cameras in despite the case not having any major national security implications. He allowed the defense to run wild with conspiracy theories without evidence. He showed sexism towards Clark. He refused to recuse himself despite the fact that his wife was the superior officer of Mark Furhman. Ito deserves the largest share of the blame.

@@albertwong1182the judge should not have allowed them to rearrange simpsons home with African art and pictures of his mother. That’s insane. As we see in elections, emotions go into things more than rationality. The seeds were continually planted in Simpsons favor. But it was a mess on all fronts.

@@gary_michael_flanagan_wildlife yep, you are right. I forgot to mention about the re-arranging of Simpson’s home. Ito shouldn’t have allowed that. It wasn’t relevant to the case since that is not the crime scene.

Ito was obsessed with celebrity. He was holding private meeting with stars in his chambers for no reason than to hang out with them.

@@taraniso ...and you were one of those supposed "Stars," RIGHT?

@@taraniso And he would bring the lawyers back there to show them how Mike Myers portrayed him on SNL.

You're too smart to believe her horse shit lies! Come down the rabbit hole with me and I will show you the truth off of C.F.'s channel!

He didn't do it cause he would have way more cuts on him then what he had

Myra Thompson He did have several cuts.

@@myrathompson7398 Yes

It was never about the evidence, it was about race in the end.

Yep, because they mishandled it and allowed the race card to be inserted when it should never have even had the trial in downtown LA.

She didn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

@@mspennyisaac The evidence proved OJ Simpson's guilt to a certainty. That jury just ignored it because they didn't want to convict a famous black hero. So, they gave him two free murders.

​@@mspennyisaacYes she did. I watched the trial live everyday for its entirety ....his guilt was proven beyond any doubt.....8 biased, racist black women on the jury were never going to convict.....fact....

Marcia such a pillar in the community. She just spent $12,330,000 of her own money on a shelter for battered people.

While she's a lovely woman, the blood evidence in OJ Simpson trial was BS!! .... Watch "OJ Simpson; Fact or Fiction" to be informed.

I’m white and I can see why they acquitted him. H did it yes but if the lead cop in the case refuses to say he didn’t plant evidence, like you kinda have to acquit. That’s reasonable doubt

@@briannawaldorf8485 it's called beyond reasonable doubt .

How? Don't say blood evidence bc the blood was tampered with and planted and so was the gloves. So how? Bet you won't explain

@@briannawaldorf8485they asked that last question to Mark Furhman on the stand bc they knew once you start answering questions pleading the 5th they all have to be answered that way. You can’t go back and forth and the defense knew their jury was too stupid to understand that and they would take the bait. That jury was picked for on purpose not by mistake

Why does it matter what color u are?

Marcia was so incompetent and terrible in this case, idk why people are coming around to think she was a good woman, she let a double murderer go free.

@@alvalankerofficial The whole case was based on BS!! Please watch "OJ: Fact or Fiction" on UKposts to know better. Heck, how do you find blood evidence (pinhead amount of blood) three weeks later after the place was watched and cleaned?? ... The sloppy criminalists, and criminal detectives (Fuhrman and Vannatter) dragged Marcia to the ground. Fuhrman confessed his hatred to black men who spouse white women. He knew the Simpsons. In '85 as Nicole ran into his arms after she called the cops on OJ for domestic abuse case and Fuhrman was the cop who showed up. ___ Nothing happened that day as no charges were pressed, although ironically he wrote a report in ’89 (four years later), when he wasn't on that case. Why? Because he said the '85 case left him with “insurable impression". Of the 9 calls by Nicole, only Fuhrman wrote a report, a four years late report . This is the man who “found" the gloves. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence! His tape recording were not all played in court. Surprisingly, similar words were uttered and written in request for a “risk pay" pension in early 80s. The defence had a long suspicion about Fuhrman at the start of the trial, the tape were discovered in late August. It just proved every suspicion about him. Not enough!! The sloppy work by the criminalists and the forensic team created many doubts. After OJ gave a blood samples, detective Vannater took the blood vial not to the lab, but to OJ's house, presumably to give it to the criminalists there. Ironically, they can't account for 1.5 millilitres of missing blood. The blood on the sock which the man who took it from the scene Mr. Fung, had EDTA (a blood preservative usually added to blood vials). And Mr. Fung initial note on the sock was that it didn't had any bloods on it. Doubts were all over the place for the jury. The alleged blood stained clothes and the knife was thrown out by OJ at the airport, but he was careless enough to leave a “bloody” sock on his bedroom. Kato Kaelin heard three loud bangs behind his room. The prosecution say OJ hit his head on the AC unit three times (like a loony tunes cartoon). There were no injuries on OJ's head. Ron Goldman had bruised knuckles, he fought for his life, yet no bruises on OJ's body. ⚠️ My point is, the defence created enough doubts, to make conviction on “beyond reasonable doubt" an impossible task

I don't know why! She is a fraud, and everyone knows it!

Marsha Clark=Scientology=Charles Manson

Jack Johnson Yes there is a connection with Marcia and her two ex-husbands that were Scientologist! OJ also practice the art of Scientology, and he had a relationship with Marcia's ex-husband that was mysteriously shot. OJ played cards with him... I think his name was Gabby Horowitz.

You seem to be totally nuts my friend. Sad.

If I am nuts why are you responding my friend!?

Marilyn G. It’s called ok made in America . It’s already been shown , but you can watch anywhere online or UKposts just have to pay 5 dollars . It’s an 5 part documentary and it got an Oscar and it was well deserved ! It was the best documentary I’ve ever seen - watch it for sure

I watched the whole trial in real time and totally agree with you.

OJ : Made in America - available on Hulu right now. One of the BEST documentaries Ive ever seen!!! Esp part 5 (final episode)

Marcia please write about the cover up, framed, manufactured evidence and explain why o.j. blood was not booked at jail the set carry around to crime scene

The whole case was based on BS!! Please watch "OJ: Fact or Fiction" on UKposts to know better. Heck, how do you find blood evidence (pinhead amount of blood) three weeks later after the place was watched and cleaned?? ... The sloppy criminalists, and criminal detectives (Fuhrman and Vannatter) dragged Marcia to the ground. 🔔 Fuhrman confessed his hatred to black men who spouse white women. He knew the Simpsons. In '85 as Nicole ran into his arms after she called the cops on OJ for domestic abuse case and Fuhrman was the cop who showed up. ___ Nothing happened that day as no charges were pressed, although ironically he wrote a report in ’89 (four years later), when he wasn't on that case. Why? Because he said the '85 case left him with “insurable impression". Of the 9 calls by Nicole, only Fuhrman wrote a report, a four years late report . This is the man who “found" the gloves. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence! His tape recording were not all played in court. Surprisingly, similar words were uttered and written in request for a “risk pay" pension in early 80s. The defence had a long suspicion about Fuhrman at the start of the trial, the tape were discovered in late August. It just proved every suspicion about him. Not enough!! The sloppy work by the criminalists and the forensic team created many doubts. After OJ gave a blood samples, detective Vannater took the blood vial not to the lab, but to OJ's house, presumably to give it to the criminalists there. Ironically, they can't account for 1.5 millilitres of missing blood. The blood on the sock which the man who took it from the scene Mr. Fung, had EDTA (a blood preservative usually added to blood vials). And Mr. Fung initial note on the sock was that it didn't had any bloods on it. Doubts were all over the place for the jury. The alleged blood stained clothes and the knife was thrown out by OJ at the airport, but he was careless enough to leave a “bloody” sock on his bedroom. Kato Kaelin heard three loud bangs behind his room. The prosecution say OJ hit his head on the AC unit three times (like a loony tunes cartoon). There were no injuries on OJ's head. Ron Goldman had bruised knuckles, he fought for his life, yet no bruises on OJ's body. ⚠️ My point is, the defence created enough doubts, to make conviction on “beyond reasonable doubt" an impossible task

A&W Rootbeer it would not matter.the jury already made up they're mind's about letting him go.

Don't do it She is a fraud!

Tony Starks buying her book

I hate that the interviewer said size 11 with so much conviction Marcia almost looked like she was going to Cree the her but decided against it

She was calm, cool, and collected in that courtroom. Having had 10 years experience as a prosecutor; more that all the so called ‘dream team’. Nothing flustered or intimidated her. There was no chance of winning this case due to race and the political climate at the time. She was the best possible prosecutor for the job.

Speak for yourself.

@marco polo: Ask Vince Bugliosi what Clark, Darden & Co. could have done (that could have prevented that circus). Hint: There's far more than one thing.

@@stddisclaimer8020 I am a huge fan of Bugliosi and have read his writings on this case. Manson and his other cases had none of the same issues, namely race and courtroom coverage, AND an idiot judge who was the main reason for the loss!

@@marcopolo-xj4yw An Idiot judge perhaps, but my comment's focus was more on the serious errors the prosecution made, which Bugliosi painstakingly detailed in his book and in his interviews and appearances (and you must know what they are).The only question being, absent those prosecutor errors, would the outcome have been different (better)? I say quite likely, yes. A hung jury at the worst.

you write all that spill..then end it with how she looks, really..!!!.that's the sort of sexism she had to put up in court with the judge !!!

Kate Donlan She looked really stressed back in the day. Much more happier and relaxed now.

@@dougstyles5091 Cut her some slack, she was going through a divorce and custody battle at the same time. Not to mention the crap she was getting from the media on a daily basis.

She was going through a vicious divorce, including custody issues, at the same time she was prosecuting O.J.

How is that rising to the top? She should’ve stayed in the job field. I feel for her, feeling like she had to quit. So sad. But also the defence probably doesn’t feel like killing themselves. They did their job. Every person needs a defence guilty or innocent. That’s how our justice system works. If we didn’t have defence attorneys we would have an authoritarian government who throws people in jail at will.

Nonsense. At best she comes across like a 2 year old throwing a tantrum and expecting things to be handed over. A person who knows and respects her job should have gone back to work and corrected what ever loopholes that contributed to this loss. They had an almost level playing field with the defense and am sure she is not used to that. Why did she not walk away after the Rodney king beating case??? We all saw him being beaten. It was on tape!!!

Marcia was so incompetent and terrible in this case, idk why people are coming around to think she was a good woman, she let a double murderer go free.

@@laikaevelyn4478 Agree, Marcia is terrible.

@@briannawaldorf8485 Everybody should know how to spell defense too but they don't.

Agreed. I don't know if you are aware of Vince Buglioso's book Outrage: The Five Reasons Why OJ Simpson Got Away With Murder where he eviscerated the prosecution.

Cynthia Mcfadden--its in the title!!!

Google it

Not when race plays a role. It becomes a whole different thing.

Of course, very different time period...can't complain about as nothing now, cause you'll hurt people's Feelings!

Agreed. I don't know if you are aware of Vince Buglioso's book Outrage: The Five Reasons Why OJ Simpson Got Away With Murder where he eviscerated the prosecution.

@@milart12 yes I watched his special on UKposts while I wrote that comment above. He gave her team an F- didn’t hold back

@@terrancemayrose The difference between the prosecution and Bugliosi was immense

It wasn't "payback" they did a TERRIBLE job. The Jurors saw how terrible it was. None of the evidence added up.

NICOLE BROWN AND RON GOLDMAN...I GUESS YOU'VE FORGOTTEN AS WELL

It’s not an okay boomer. Clearly you don’t understand what okay boomer means. OJ got off cause the LAPD was fucking racist as hell and no one trusted them. This is the fault of a) the LAPD for keeping racist cops having jobs b) the fault of the prosecution for using Mark furman as a witness, knowing he’s a fucking racist (that’s Marcia’s fault as she has admitted, Darden didn’t want furman on the stand because as a black man he knew better). They deserved this brutal beating too this was a wake up call to the LAPD to fucking fix their shit. You can find FBI files from around this time. The LAPD was LITERALLY infiltrated with white supremacist gang members. If a cop said under oath he plead the 5th on whether or not he planted evidence, I too would vote to acquit. You must prove guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This was a very reasonable doubt

@@vincem2759 it was payback they said that in the interview. There was massive amounts of evidence. For ever contaminated evidence there was more evidence that was not contaminated. One blood drop at crime scene is enough to convict him period. The dude had Nicole’s and Ron’s blood in his car how the fck is that possible And Also planting evidence was bs it was impossible within the time frame because they didn’t even know he was suspect yet period.

She quit after the case, and she said the case drove her to chain smoke throughout the trial. Going through her divorce at the same time didn't help either.

Then why was she defeated?

@@daviddavis3389 because I wished it.