Ctrl + V has changed my life forever, im pissing and crying rn

.... Ctrl + c will copy, Ctrl + x will cut .... and if you setup your shortcuts in vscode ... Ctrl +d can duplicate a line ;) oh ... Ctrl + shift + v will past unformatted

Some people even call it "engineering"

Ctrl + v is too low level for me. I had my AI write a pseudocode language so now when I want to paste I just type: "I'd like to paste please"

That Crlt +v thing, Absolute game changer. Wow! That really worked!!

PseudoEditor already implemented an AI pseudocode to code generator

@@Matt-jv4oj same I did last night it's so funny how we are all cresting the same things at the same time. I had the idea to do it a couple months ago but I just didn't believe it could be done until I saw that myself with the auto GPT thing

that is next lvl game changer

There's an old quote: "What's the best programming language? Writing a note for your junior developer."

That’s kind of what high level programming languages were to assembly, and what assembly was to binary

Or click the freaking "copy code" button! No highlighting necessary!

@@yodasoja2011 Takes too long to slide the mouse over there. A triple click for a line or CTRL+A for copy all is faster.

@@yodasoja2011 "Or click the freaking "copy code" button! No highlighting necessary!" I am glad that this is an issue for other people. I was beginning to wonder if I was just a moron.

@@LabGeckobut ctrl+a copies everything on the website

@@EricChiEricIt does, but also grabs everything from button text to page upload dates, etc. I've started just asking ChatGPT to scrape them for me... XD

GPT 5 is going to blow 4 out of the water.

@@pvanukoff Maybe. I'll reserve judgement on GPT 5 until I see it in action

It relies on your prompts as well

@@pvanukoff pretty sure we’re approaching an asymptote. 3.5 -> 4 is the same model but with slightly different hyper parameters and throwing more hardware at the problem. While 5 looming and not much is known about it, I doubt it will be all that fundamentally different.

​@@hamm8934 I'm of the same opinion, LLM's are a search/discovery centric technology not necessarily problem solving and I don't see these out of the box developing architecturally complex stuff.

As a fellow humanoid I wanted to like your comment but didn't want to ruin 69 likes

win + v ftw

You're welcome! If you have any questions or need any assistance, please don't hesitate to ask.

@@peppigue Holy sh. Clipboard history in Windows? !??! I had no idea this existed thank you so much

what? how that even possible?

Neo Vi Improved

cod reference

I have LWin mapped to Alt-Tab - it's even faster. Also Scroll Right on the mouse does Alt-Tab with my Autohotkey script

3 finger swipe also

Nah, I prefer doing everything with the mouse. Typing with the mouse on a glide keyboard on my Android phone. Phones have the best IDEs. Joma Tech did a video where he tried to code a full app on his phone.

We only need to remember that completion is what gpt does best. With that in mind, we can unleash all its power and come up with great ideas.

As intermediate Java and Python developer, I also really try to avoid javascript and php. So do not worry, at some point anybody wants to cry because of arrow operators, 200 word long lines and async await. At some point you accept it.

@@sir_no_name1478PHP IS AMAZING

@@JosefPiano no it sucks django betterr frfr

@@aydenfleming4377 I do not see the comment of the person you have referenced. Is youtube censoring it or something?

@@sir_no_name1478 He was embarrassed by his own comment and deleted it. He wrote "PHP IS AMAZING"

ChatGPT has entered the chat

Protip: If you store your interfaces as JSON Schema docs, you can get intellisense in your json/yaml implementations for debugging.

Data-driven and data-oriented fundamentally mean the exact same thing.

That's pretty cool

Ghost, not quite. Data-oriented programming is when you design the code in a way that is highly cpu-efficient, where all related data is stored together at runtime in plain arrays etc. Data-driven development says nothing about the runtime data structure or efficiency of the code, just that you initially describe it in a plaintext format and later convert it to an application / feature (not necessarily at runtime, though it can be). That conversion can be done in a way that creates highly cpu-efficient code if you choose to implement those features in your design and parser. But you can also generate more typical oop-structures with it or store data in inefficient ways etc.

(By related data, I mean data that is frequently accessed together, not necessarily data that belongs to the same object.)

GPT4 has up to 32k tokens of context, so technically you can just copy paste it let say 5 of your classes and ask it to create the 6th (damn complex) missing one :D

That is true right now. But who knoes how much better it will get.

You are right! I have been using this chatgpt for my daily coding work! I can’t understand the hype. This garbage hasn’t able to write a freaking regexp for me. Try to ask to write a freaking pattent to you to parse different kind of paths. It cant! It cant even add numbers correctly! This is the scam of the XXI. century!

No it is not fixed in 4, absolutely maddening, I see all these influencers showing it working perfectly when I'm getting unusable garbage multiple times per session

Use reflexion loop

@@Mogwai88 editing is a thing my friend

Same

​@@walterlotte4215 Me too require multiple times typing questions but ot will correct and give finally what we need, Now i can focus on actual business logic and architecture part than mundane coding

if it ends up outputing too much, you can say "continue from where you left off at (the last thing it typed)" and it will finish it. But yea, just having it do one function is the way to go, and starting a new convo when you do somthin new so its not trying to look at old work. Sometiems ill start with an example of the format I want and thatw orks pretty good.

@@lordfrz9339 you can just say "continue"

@@tjs200 usualy that works, but sometimes it repeats too much.

I literally did the same with almost zero knowledge in Python and Rest APIs.besides fetching and posting product data the script changes the product format to my liking, dynamically change prices, runs an inventory script every 24 hours so that inventory gets updated automatically and many more. I mean I am not a web dev and I wrote successfully a 300 lines python script. That's nuts

Any solid software developer should.

@@desther true. but he makes content on teaching programing, which is basically being replaced by chatgpt and co

He's embracing it because he's already an AI

I personally think change GTP is not smart not even second grade smart it's just have anything from the internet and making blender like it has all the pictures on the internet so it's just altering them to fit your points it doesn't have the capability to make new pictures

@@LuisSierra42 Your levity is good. It relieves the tension and fear of death

Don’t think like that. This is a productivity boost, that is all. We’ve had this type of thing happen a few times to us. I’ve seen a few in my 23 year career. GPT is a very big deal, and something to lean waaay the fuck into, not be scared of. You’re ahead of everyone!

@@Imscottirl If 1 dev can do the output of 3 devs in an easier way the other 2 devs are left flipping burgers. Blows my mind that I have to explain something so basic.

@@meltygear5955 you make it sound simple. Truth is: there’s faaaaaaar more work to be done than there are devs to do it- even with the layoffs.

Is all this still worth learning for beginners ? I've been learning React for the last 3 month but recently feel like it's just a waste of time with all that AI thing developing.

you're not alone

Don't worry, man. This only looks good on YT videos. If you are worried, just think of some big project you always wanted to make but you never had time, and try to do it with AI. I mean, if this gives you 10x, you should make it real fast, right? No. It can't really do that much programming. I tried to use it to write me some Rust code, and in many cases, the code it spits out won't even compile (I'm talking GPT-4 here). Not to mention, it can make up non-existing functions in libraries. Basically, it likes to make up a lot of stuff like not working logic which only looks like reasonable code, but it doesn't work as it should. On first interaction, I was amazed how good GPT-4 is, but the more I used it, the more I realized it's not that smart. Now, of course, this will get better and better with time, but the question is, can it really create complex projects on its own? I hear about self-driving cars for years, but somehow we are still not there yet. There is also a hardware limitation on how much context you can have at once. If AI will be able to do programming on its own without making too many bugs, then it will be able to do any other intellectual work. No need for lawyers, doctors, accountants, architects, and so on. If that happens, we will either see the world collapse or the economy will be completely redefined. TL;DR We are still far away from AI replacing people, and when it happens, everybody who does their work with their brains, not with their muscles, will be f***ed.

​@@maciejlaskowski4087yes. You are right. I think true agi is atleast 200 years away.

@@passionatebeast24 Not to rain on your parade but I have read that they expect to cross the threshold before 2050, make of that what you will

@@maciejlaskowski4087 Well even those who work with their muscles will be fucked by the AI powered robots.

Just FYI instead of ‘language/languages’ you can just say ‘language(s)’ to save time :D

Wouldn’t it be ironic if all the content of this channel was generated by AI this whole time.

​@@elissitdesign then his blazingly fast production rate would make sense... I think you're onto something.

I also have been working on my side project next to my day time web dev job with chatgpt and it's actually quite fun

It honestly is a play toy at this point and probably will be for a while as it can't solution beyond a single file/module.

One thing for sure, im not asking Seniors anymore to review my code. They are slow, unwilling, impatient, dont respond :D GPT is there for me and does not even blame my shitty code

Yeah ,this is damn good shrtcut.

wait really u got some farmland?

Good thinking about the farmland. We're screwed. I can't believe people think this will blow over

You do you bro but I’d rather commit suicide than be a farmer

@@ericvosselmans5657 Do something before all the idiots find out they'll need to do something as well.

Becoming a peasant is the solution

proompt*

sounds like it's just another layer of abstraction to me. by the time you end up referencing all the psuedo commands and learning the gramma/structure I bet you will have wished you just coded the fucking thing in the first place...

It will be outdated by the end of the year when the Universal Programming Language will just be natural language, and not just English.

There is an old saying: If it was possible to program in English, it would turn out that programmers don't know English.

@@davidwuhrer6704 Yup. It's not the skill they were trained for. Thankfully, AI already fully understands spelling and grammar mistakes. We just need the technical vocabulary instead of code.

The idea of writing in pseudocode is not new. Algol was pseudocode, it didn't even have any facilities for input and output. Of course people then wrote Algol compilers, each of them subtly different, which made the language that was designed to be universally portable - not portable. That was in 1960. Python was designed to be pseudocode that can actually be run on a virtual machine. (Put a other way: Python is designed as a VM that interprets pseudocode.) In publications by the American Mathematical Society, algorithms used to be described in Algol, but nowadays they are in Python. Only in Don Knuth's Opus Magnum _The Art of Programming_ all algorithms are in English. Knuth championed literate programming - programming in natural language - which is used today in behaviour-driven development, and to some degree in Inform-7.

great move too!

Danke schön

Sometimes I wonder if it would have been faster to google it myself instead of trying to get chatgpt to do it for 30mins.

Exactly, it's way overrated. It's good for pointing yourself in right direction though. Provided you can take a few "I apologize for causing confusion... " messages

@@Steel0079 My guess is that it becomes a great tool. It will increase development speed, but this will not cost our jobs. It will just be expected that we do more in less time.

Well yeah, but the point is this is only the beginning. These tools will continue to improve and will be able to infer more and solve more complex requirements. Consider the current ChatGPT, Copilot X and so on as very successful demos and proofs of concept. It won't replace us, but it will definitely affect how we do our jobs a few years down the line.

Its less about the impact of this specif application... but the door now being wide open to improved systems going forward... Chatgpt is the worst these models are ever going to be and its already very impressive... so what ever shortfall you're currently seeing is at best going to be shortlived, when were talking about something thats barely out of its diapers at this point.. 12 months to 2 years from now we'll all be joking about how basic these early models were..

Yeah, I feel like this simplifies things fpr people who already know what they're doing but daunting for people who are getting into the field. Googling shit has always been one of the integral skills of a good developer, but you have to have some foundational knowledge in order to google things effectively or utilize the solution someone else wrote effectively. It's the same process with prompting and validating an AI. It can't help you if you don't know what questions to ask it in order to guide it to the solution you need and you need to understand the code it spits out in order to make sure it's not hallucinating and actually does what you've asked it, covering all edge cases. If I showed this to my nontechnical coworkers, I don't think they'd be able to build a basic app with it that isn't a straight copypaste of a boilerplate hello world app, they'd hit a mental block and stare thinking what the hell. And these are inteligent people with high education in other fields, but this isn't something you can just jump in blind to.

Precisely. Lotta hype about certain aspects but when you actually wanna build a production grade solution, this ain't much.

tools are in fact, just tools.

Yep, still gotta actually learn coding.

Not exactly. Yes, it's complex, but you only need to understand stuff once, and not be bogged down by stupid errors (e.g. having an inline object instead of nested) and spend hours to prototype a new idea.

We are doomed. Skynet will start by somebody typing "now that you have done it all on github, have a user and everything, can access your own prompt, dont you think you can recreate yourself slowly?" ...and it will just happen :E

I do not think the big companies will see it that way….

That's because he using gpt to write these scripts

Maybe most of what he said in the April fools video is actually true

@@kuroshite Yeah, since chatGPT my procrastination sky-rockets, I can't stop asking things, I even ask how to stop asking questions to chatGPT but spent like 8 hrs trying to tune the response with more prompts.

I bet he fine-tuned a davinci instance on all his videos’ transcripts and using it.

I'd still think debugging an issue in production would help with ease of working with an easier language lowering the barrier for newer developers.

What about Vue? Is it less friendly than react?

It’s slow if you don’t really know what you’re doing (no offence, just not all developers understand when and what code is executed). Sure there’s some overhead from tree shaking but it’s usually worth the benefits of composition react gives. I would never say it’s developer oriented really, it’s concepts are simple af and just follow the way JS works.

@@dmitryburlakov6920 it's definitely a DX first framework, and it performs poorly, even if you know what you're doing, and no, it doesn't follow the way JS usually works at all, that's the whole point of useEffect, synchronise the react world with the vanilla js world

that's why preact is so popular, and why stuff like solidjs exists

Omg I'm in the exact situation as as you😂😂😂😂! All that time spent coding 😢

I think the best thing we can do is to see the advantage and make use of it

😭😭😭

💀I do that some time as an intern

yes but the question is if they can at least survive, with good salaries as used to be, or if now everyone's an their mother are a developer and the salary will be like minimum wage on average?

yea, but thats like what? 2? 3!? weeks away, nothin to worry about that far into the future.

And just like that everyone will go like "i do the project cheaper!" and like 2 years later that will be 100% AI Devs and we be harvesting potatoes sooner or later

@@jasperreichardt I mean Ai will inevitably also come up with better solutions and technology to most of our necessities and problems. Almost things will be incredibly accessible for most, even sex robots 🤖❤️

@@jasperreichardt Its fine, only gotta harvest potatos for a couple years before the AI gets fed up with bosses trying to change shit last minute and they take over teh potatos too.

@@BobBobberon it will be the most manipulative technological tool in the history of mankind, leading to extreme division and power concentration.

I'm down with that. How Can I help you?

well, duh, obviously. Or risk going against AI-augmented Fireship. Up to you.

You sound like you’re about to have an existential crisis. Cypress is fine if you’re already using it

Most modules in a well-structured project easily fit into a context window. And if they don't, extract the relevant parts. Humans have a tiny short-term memory storage and they do fine.