Military contract price gouging: Defense contractors overcharge Pentagon | 60 Minutes

  Переглядів 792,014

60 Minutes

60 Minutes

11 місяців тому

A six-month 60 Minutes investigation found the nation’s defense budget is plagued by a military supply chain rife with price gouging.
#60minutes #news #military
"60 Minutes" is the most successful television broadcast in history. Offering hard-hitting investigative reports, interviews, feature segments and profiles of people in the news, the broadcast began in 1968 and is still a hit, over 50 seasons later, regularly making Nielsen's Top 10.
Subscribe to the “60 Minutes” UKposts channel: bit.ly/1S7CLRu
Watch full episodes: cbsn.ws/1Qkjo1F
Get more “60 Minutes” from “60 Minutes: Overtime”: cbsn.ws/1KG3sdr
Follow “60 Minutes” on Instagram: bit.ly/23Xv8Ry
Like “60 Minutes” on Facebook: on. 1Xb1Dao
Follow “60 Minutes” on Twitter: bit.ly/1KxUsqX
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

КОМЕНТАРІ: 4 800
@kalinda619
@kalinda619 11 місяців тому
As a former employee at a large Defense contractor, I can firmly say these companies are leeches on the national security of our country. So many of my coworkers added zero value to our contracts, other than keeping seats warm.
@Rust_Rust_Rust
@Rust_Rust_Rust 11 місяців тому
Thanks for helping the enemy
@andrewstutz4240
@andrewstutz4240 11 місяців тому
Same boat sir, it’s pathetic to watch in action.
@user-hy9pm1tg6l
@user-hy9pm1tg6l 11 місяців тому
General Dynamics Information Technology....
@linmal2242
@linmal2242 11 місяців тому
@@Rust_Rust_Rust China? Russia? Cartels?
@lissettelopez8331
@lissettelopez8331 11 місяців тому
when a government contract requires diversity quotas to be filled, they are forced to hire under qualified, over payed, lazy people that are the best job security of the bunch simply because of their skin color or background.
@thegooddoctor2009
@thegooddoctor2009 11 місяців тому
This is real journalism, something sorely missed in the modern age.
@jtwilliams8895
@jtwilliams8895 11 місяців тому
I know, right? Now, how about a report on the “intelligence community’s” meddling in domestic politics here in the US? Highly illegal, but clear as day.
@blockededited8280
@blockededited8280 11 місяців тому
😂
@carkawalakhatulistiwa
@carkawalakhatulistiwa 11 місяців тому
​@@jtwilliams8895 11991 Soviet Union disbanded. 1992 military budget cut by 50%. 1993 51 military companies merge into 5
@beng4647
@beng4647 11 місяців тому
Sadly it isn't.
@TheNondiscriminatory
@TheNondiscriminatory 11 місяців тому
it's not missed. it's here. right here. you're looking at it.
@eclecticwizard
@eclecticwizard 11 місяців тому
I worked as a defense contractor for roughly seven years. The amount of waste is incredible. The sad part is that most of these contractors are former military gouging their own. So much for patriotism and supporting our troops.
@richardkroll2269
@richardkroll2269 11 місяців тому
Love that Raytheon and Boeing gouge the country for 40% profit on the Patriot and the Russian shut down a battery in Kiev after they blew off 30 missiles and god only knows what they hit. Still wondering if the got the command trailer on top of the radar and 5 launchers.
@benzun9600
@benzun9600 11 місяців тому
Merika, its owned by corporate interests
@Jeremy61300
@Jeremy61300 11 місяців тому
That’s how these military leaders that retire get into business with the contractor before times comes to retire. Gets them squared away for nice comfy office jobs making a extremely large salary.
@firstsergeant9361
@firstsergeant9361 11 місяців тому
yep, companies with retired generals on their boards of advisors.
@carkawalakhatulistiwa
@carkawalakhatulistiwa 11 місяців тому
​@@benzun9600 12:51 The ultimate goal of capitalism is to get as much profit as possible. to create monopoly and imperialism
@step_freeskills101
@step_freeskills101 11 місяців тому
give this guy a bronze star medal.. by simply being uncorrupt able is amazing nowadays. He isn't afraid of intimidation, death threats and etc
@recalcitrantrecidivist5927
@recalcitrantrecidivist5927 11 місяців тому
Price gouging should be considered an act of treason.
@michaelashby9654
@michaelashby9654 11 місяців тому
Used to be. But those days are long gone. The only thing the US ruling elite care about is profits. And the ruling elite really run everything. Populism is a delusion.
@Eclipse-lw4vf
@Eclipse-lw4vf 11 місяців тому
so what about local companies and people like tyson price gouging food etc?
@Zempgara
@Zempgara 11 місяців тому
Or at least an act of capitalism.
@LMLewis
@LMLewis 11 місяців тому
Price gouging during the civil war resulted in the False Claims Act. The law allows whistleblowers to receive a portion of the proceeds recovered from by the government and allows government to fine violators. Unfortunately, it hasn't produced much in the way of reform. Businesses (particularly the pharmaceutical industry) turn right around and break the law again, treating fines as the cost of doing business.
@yougottrolledbythebest8117
@yougottrolledbythebest8117 11 місяців тому
@@Eclipse-lw4vf dumb
@zachcouch8654
@zachcouch8654 11 місяців тому
They should run this story every month.
@phlezktravels
@phlezktravels 11 місяців тому
Day
@hm3drake35
@hm3drake35 11 місяців тому
Why? you think you can SHAME the politicians into not wasting our tax dollars? hasn't worked yet.
@jessejamez5985
@jessejamez5985 11 місяців тому
ACCOUNTABILITY! ACCOUNTABILITY! ACCOUNTABILITY!
@ericpowers6509
@ericpowers6509 11 місяців тому
Every day. Let the people know. Watch change happen when Americans knows the worst of it. If defense contractors don't change,they won't be around anymore.
@noahway13
@noahway13 11 місяців тому
PLEASE Like this and send it on, and if you are a tech person, find ways to launch this and give it legs. This Is America's feet of clay.
@shoottrue5115
@shoottrue5115 11 місяців тому
Im prior Air Force and even as a low level airman I saw the prices we paid for things. Its INSANE what we paid these companies for things.
@carkawalakhatulistiwa
@carkawalakhatulistiwa 11 місяців тому
1991 Soviet Union disbanded. 1992 military budget cut by 50%. 1993 51 military companies merge into 5
@rorytribbet6424
@rorytribbet6424 11 місяців тому
Price gouging by national defense contractors should be seen and treated as a grave threat to national security
@lziv7583
@lziv7583 10 місяців тому
But the problem is there are too many people in power whose incentives are to not care
@2MartSaar
@2MartSaar 9 місяців тому
IT is but the war is crap and money is king , and somewhat it is good that it is hapening , then the already useless killing of each other gets more difficult , what is good , although other areas than military would need the money/resources too ..
@BillySBC
@BillySBC 11 місяців тому
I worked in the defense industry for about 6 or 7 years and I had to get out of it, the whole thing seemed geared towards racking up billable hours to the government, nobody was there to protect the country, and the involvement of the top Military brass was atrocious. Top military officials recieved all kinds of kickbacks, mostly in the form of high level jobs with the military contractors they were supposedly there to oversee. The whole defense industry is a mess.
@artstrology
@artstrology 11 місяців тому
We call them the Perfumed Princes of the Pentagon. Imagine how much even vendors are willing to pay a general if he designates their port as a stop on the whistle tour. Reduce our mil budget by 80%. That is the correct number, or we will be in perpetual war...
@tdot1651
@tdot1651 11 місяців тому
Well you just described the FDA and the CDC . This whole thing makes think with how big is the military budget gap with Russia and China, How really big is the gap in Military Power? Vladimir Putin was talking about it in his interviews with Oliver Stone. Corruption and Greed will be the Downfall of the US Empire
@Bloodclotzzzzzzzzzzz
@Bloodclotzzzzzzzzzzz 11 місяців тому
The food, water, and shelter industries need this kind of blank check.
@eholm101
@eholm101 11 місяців тому
@@tdot1651 Putin and Oliver Stone, now that’s a useful duo for reliable information lol. The dubious nature of a conversation between those two aside, greed and lack of shame or respect or accountability by those that can take advantage is a major problem here… especially if only one company is making a munition or device. Companies acquiring more and more smaller companies is a problem in banking (too big to fail) with hospitals and other industries (reducing workers ability to negotiate wages).
@williamwcheung
@williamwcheung 11 місяців тому
@tdot1651 surprisingly Russia is even more corrupt and inefficient than the US
@theprof73
@theprof73 11 місяців тому
My father was both a USAF officer and electrical engineer for defense contractors for decades... this stuff drove him nuts. A project he worked on needed a tape recorder with certain requirements. They were going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on designing a custom unit and, because the would need relatively few, the manufacturing was going to be thousands for each. He simply found a quality off-the-shelf unit and proved it met all the required specs. Saved hundreds of thousands on design and hundreds of thousands on manufacturing.
@ronr.53400
@ronr.53400 11 місяців тому
wow 😳
@jeanious2009
@jeanious2009 11 місяців тому
You know what’s funny, I repair 12v amplifiers and have received amplifiers for repair from; air force electrical engineer, electrical engineers, other repair techs. And some where very simple repairs. I have zero education in electronics yet can repair devices that these people attempted but couldn’t.😂😂
@bluorion4360
@bluorion4360 11 місяців тому
The bureaucracy and red tape reminds me of Communist way of doing things and wasting money. It is astonishing that this is happening in US and we the taxpayers are witnessing this disgrace.
@Pbtbreakingpoint
@Pbtbreakingpoint 11 місяців тому
@@jeanious2009 I think you're seeing it the wrong way. An electrical engineer couldn't diagnose the issue? lol. Most people in those fields love to tinker. They have plenty of money to rip something apart just to play around and then have someone else finish.
@bartsimpson8616
@bartsimpson8616 11 місяців тому
so ? then he's second most hated Guy after this gentlman , THEY RIPPED OFF WHERE EVER THEY CAN , and nobody hurts from them NEVER.
@bm1943
@bm1943 11 місяців тому
Wow, absolutely disgraceful! Profit over the security of our country and troops on the battlefield. Great reporting by 60 Minutes as always.
@dripphoenix80
@dripphoenix80 11 місяців тому
As someone who oversees military contracts......I live and breath this nightmare daily
@tomstelling8440
@tomstelling8440 11 місяців тому
The Government needs as a national priority to open up a investigation for price gouging.
@Intranetusa
@Intranetusa 11 місяців тому
Too bad the government probably laid off the people who could conduct an investigation like how the video says they laid off half the people responsible for negotiating contracts to get fair pricing for the government.
@veramae4098
@veramae4098 11 місяців тому
Senator Harry Truman chaired a special committee investigating similar practices during WW II. It was shocking ... we were fighting for our survival and companies were reaping immense profits.
@JesusChrist2000BC
@JesusChrist2000BC 11 місяців тому
It would be like the police investigating themselves. They always find "no wrongdoing". When dealing with corrupt organizations like the DOD or police it would take an outside group coming into and essentially completely dismantling it to change anything. Changing corruption from the inside is basically impossible.
@oterosocram25
@oterosocram25 11 місяців тому
You really dont need to, there is a whistleblower law and plenty of ways to report things like this.
@Thousand_yard_King
@Thousand_yard_King 11 місяців тому
LMAO, the government is causing the very problem that they are complaining about..
@jacushman
@jacushman 11 місяців тому
As an Air Force veteran that delt with supply and logistics in areas of my 20 year career, these contractors gouge TF out of their parts and supplies. We, the taxpayers, are being sold down the road to improve a defense contractors' bottom line.
@poindextertunes
@poindextertunes 11 місяців тому
I’m sitting here watching this thinking “wtf does the pentagon pay for? thats taxpayer money”
@jamesalgovary63
@jamesalgovary63 11 місяців тому
It's like when a teenager gets ahold of their parents credit card
@anthonyroberts2678
@anthonyroberts2678 11 місяців тому
Responds, "THANK YOU FOR YOUR "SERVICE!!"" Blindly
@jackburton2680
@jackburton2680 11 місяців тому
American companies and American jobs though. It ultimately is good for the economy and will create jobs
@slappy227
@slappy227 9 місяців тому
You know how many times they said about the price gouging, for decades this has been going on and nothing gets done about it.
@chelseysharp616
@chelseysharp616 9 місяців тому
As a US airman currently stationed at a base with F-35s I can truly say contractors are ripping off the DOD. But military member who join the dark side are just smart! We see how unfair the pay is between us and contractors & we deserve better compensation.
@anthonyroberts2678
@anthonyroberts2678 11 місяців тому
This has been going on for years!! Politicians own stock in these companies! Pathetic!
@carsonm7292
@carsonm7292 11 місяців тому
British parliamentarians were heavily invested in the East India Company when they passed the Tea Act of 1773. Literally nothing changes.
@eholm101
@eholm101 11 місяців тому
Shameful if one has any sense of shame
@gesshoku92
@gesshoku92 11 місяців тому
Study found 182 members of congress (overtime) were violating the stock buying rules. The punishment set for themselves is a $200 fine, if caught. Only 4 members have ever been proven to have paid a fine for stock trading.
@babycarrots8085
@babycarrots8085 11 місяців тому
⁠@@gesshoku92 how set the price of that fine???? A measly $200 fine????
@rarefruit2320
@rarefruit2320 11 місяців тому
God bless our brave men and women serving our -companies- I mean -countries- I mean country
@bixbysnyder-00
@bixbysnyder-00 11 місяців тому
"You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?" -Julias Levinson
@tag180rotax
@tag180rotax 9 місяців тому
As a shareholder, I'm okay with this. Thanks for your contribution
@adamoneill7371
@adamoneill7371 11 місяців тому
"BUT THE NATIONAL DEBT!!! We need to cut spending on the poor!" The fact that none of this ever enters the public debate over spending priorities is outrageous. The moment anyone says anything about cost controls, they get construed as "not supporting the troops".
@garysantos7053
@garysantos7053 11 місяців тому
Five of the nation's biggest defense contractors -- Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies, and General Dynamics -- spent a combined $60 million in 2020 to influence policy, according to a new report from the Center for Responsive Politics. The paper, "Capitalizing on Conflict: How defense contractors and foreign nations lobby for arms sales," details how a network of lobbyists and donors steered $285 million in campaign contributions and $2.5 billion in lobbying spending over the last two decades as well as hiring more than 200 lobbyists who previously worked in government. Source: Military At least 15 lawmakers who hold powerful positions on a pair of House and Senate committees that control US military policy have financial ties to prominent defense contractors that together were worth nearly $1 million in 2020, according to an Insider analysis of federal financial records. -Source: INSIDER
@m.g.1391
@m.g.1391 11 місяців тому
No surprise there! You can best believe there are many more politicians in DC on the Defense Contractors payrolls or holding large amounts of stock in those companies!
@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle
@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle 11 місяців тому
Thank you Mr. Santos
@HawthorneHillNaturePreserve
@HawthorneHillNaturePreserve 11 місяців тому
YES! Thank You! 🙏
@imds123
@imds123 11 місяців тому
All this time Tulsi Gabbard was correct. The defense machine continues to run things.
@olorin1710
@olorin1710 11 місяців тому
​@@imds123she would know. She plays the game too. She recently admitted that she was in a combat role, drone striking in a country we are not at war with.
@lalah9481
@lalah9481 11 місяців тому
When I was active duty, asking questions about why our section was buying crap we didn’t need-they said that it’s just the way we had to do ‘it’. When I pushed and looked farther into it I found out about the ‘buckets’; each type of work or squadron had its own ‘bucket’ of money from the budget to achieve its mission. If the particular fiscal year actually cost less than was allocated, they were encouraged to spend the balance to zero. The rule was that if we didn’t spend it then we didn’t need it-and that money wouldn’t be there the next year. So when the next year actually cost more to operate and accomplish the mission, there wouldn’t be enough money in our ‘bucket’. Every job required to accomplish the collective missions has years where more is needed to safely, and successfully do our jobs. The lesson that had been hard wired in the military was that if we didn’t use it, we lose it. Really stupid. The things we contract out for, everything from jets to coffee pots, prices are set by those companies out there. They want the best prices they can get for the contracts they fulfill. There are no actual watchdogs. Self-reporting or monitoring can’t work; why would anyone let go of funding now to save money when it is known that down the line the funds will be needed and no longer allocated? It’s harder to get funded than it is to hold on to funding already authorized.
@dangerousdan9168
@dangerousdan9168 11 місяців тому
As a Marine aboard The USS Forestall. I watched navy dump Pratt & Whitney engines & tools overboard to help make the Navy budget for the next year
@draxpendragon
@draxpendragon 11 місяців тому
was "parts guy" while in--can confirm...spend or lose it OPTAR...if for some reason you did NOT spend before the fiscal end of the month----you would lose it next month with the mentality/policy of "you obviously did not need it so we will give it to someone who does"----this cause the "end of the month splurge".....I mean seriously I would end up buying "high end Pens for the officers" because they wanted it NOT needed it---nothing like buying Mont Blanc desk sets..oak desks because "The Commander wanted it"
@tonis5140
@tonis5140 11 місяців тому
You're so right. I was the RA for a few years and it made no sense that we had to purchase from set companies when we could get things more cheaply elsewhere. The end of the fiscal year was a free for all. "Who has a wishlist?" Next thing you know, a Foosball table for the break room because we desperately need to spend money 🙄
@robertg8565
@robertg8565 11 місяців тому
I remember that in 2008 between administrations when they cut the GWOT budget, everything you don’t spend you lose.
@ebear4015
@ebear4015 11 місяців тому
This happens in the fire service as well.
@papgooner9875
@papgooner9875 11 місяців тому
we have the exact same issue in the UK MOD. Contractors will work incredibly slowly, overcharging for every single possible item along the way. Even our camp maintenance contractors are appalling, worst experience I had was with Amey where a circuit breaker tripped, the entire building of 60 - 70 residents losing electricity, and it took them 5 days to get a technician out to flip the breaker back. We pay through the nose for everything ,and the worst of it is there is very little sign of change. At least the US DOD has this guy pushing for reform, as far as im aware the UK MOD has no such drive ongoing.
@uslaserguideddemocracyseed1039
@uslaserguideddemocracyseed1039 10 місяців тому
Twenty five years ago, I was doing a Masters of Research engineering degree. I joined a Defense company in Britain to carry out my research project. At the time, that company had just been privatized. I presume you can imagine which company that was. In one of the starting meetings, I heard people saying that the project had a price tag of £500MN, Five Hundred Million Pounds, about eight six hundred and twenty million US dollars. People were asking openly: "Why?", "What is supposed to happen with all that money?". Remember, these would be the exact same people, in the exact same design offices, and to use the exact same production facilities. Well, what was supposed to happen, and what people weren't used to take into account, were huge price premiums for the earnings of the new owners. Which of course soon after followed with the privatized trains, the privatized airports and the £6.00 "kiss-and-fly" fees, the privatized Water and Electricity Utility companies, etc etc. And more recently, the privatized Royal Mail: Since the Royal Mail was sold off to "investors", it share price has skyrocketed. Why? Because, like all other Public companies before it, it is a perfectly healthy and profitable company.
@Youchubeswindon
@Youchubeswindon 9 місяців тому
​@@uslaserguideddemocracyseed1039 I never understood why they couldn't be private companies with government holding golden or class A shares. So owned by the people, but still able to raise capital, and release funds to the nation, but without the nonsense of third party profit motives. Royal Mail used to fund significant portions of the NHS in the 80's and 90's and with so much profit was also told to reduce its pensions funding to increase government coffers to support the treasury demands of the Major government. A private company owned by the government gets the capital investment and streamlining benefits of private business, the public motive for operation, along with a arms reach distance from the current political class. I assume you mean QinetiQ rather than BAe as that was more than a decade earlier than your 25 years, to have worked there around privatisation infers a certain level of remote respect.
@michaelpo761
@michaelpo761 11 місяців тому
As a contributing citizen I believe it isn't just the case presented here, it's across the board in government positions and our representatives on all levels seem to want to keep spending our money without being accountable. The interworks aren't interested in transparency and it's becoming more important than ever to keep America on the map because it's more than obvious the corruption is malignant. Taxpayers are the surgeons.
@Youtuber-ly6tx
@Youtuber-ly6tx 11 місяців тому
As a former federal employee, this has been a decades old problem. In my opinion, it seems like severe corruption with defense contract awarding. Lemme give ya another example. When I was in the Air Force, my technical orders demanded that I only use a specific permanent marker to write something on the interior of the airframe. The marker cost $1000.
@again5162
@again5162 11 місяців тому
That's nothing NASA spends $1million on a pen designed to work in space, pencils can't be used as graphite dust could start a fire
@EuroS50
@EuroS50 11 місяців тому
@@contentsdiffer5958 Yup. The development of the pen is what cost the money - not the pen itself.
@again5162
@again5162 11 місяців тому
@@contentsdiffer5958 I still hear today thanks to internet that NASA spends $1million on each space pen and Russians still use a 10 cent pencil
@naverilllang
@naverilllang 11 місяців тому
​@@again5162 the russians initially did use pencils. Then they discovered that fragments of graphite floating about a cabin full of delicate electronics is probably bad
@skytron22
@skytron22 11 місяців тому
This is a common practice for all government contractors, not just in the defense industry. The fault lies in how these contracts work, and because you’ll be given less money if you work within or under budget. You’re practically rewarded for going over budget.
@jaybeebee9288
@jaybeebee9288 11 місяців тому
Well known fact for over 40 years.
@jjutt87
@jjutt87 11 місяців тому
Stealing is stealing.
@oterosocram25
@oterosocram25 11 місяців тому
Yeap, like biz traveling to places where work is done like to see an Orca jump and do tricks, and also overtime to watch paint dry.
@msimon6808
@msimon6808 11 місяців тому
Here is how you get that over budget reward. All the overcharging is due to Government rules and connivance. We have strict accounting to insure that. The main grift was "contract change".
@msimon6808
@msimon6808 11 місяців тому
@@jjutt87 But it isn't stealing. All the overcharging is due to Government rules and connivance. We have strict accounting to insure that. The main grift was "contract change".
@ARTEDAGUERRA
@ARTEDAGUERRA 11 місяців тому
A recent video on the 60 Minutes channel (Military contract price gouging: Defense contractors overcharge Pentagon) drew attention to the rising and exorbitant costs of weapons and other items acquired by the Pentagon; - In 1991 a stinger missile cost $25,000. Now in Ukraine war costs 400,000; - Between the years of 2005 and 2020 the Pentagon consumed 14 trillion dollars and added 5 ships to the fleet. In the same period, China spent 3 trillion and added 117 vessels; - Another problem is the decrease in the number of inspectors at the Department of Defense, a fact that has left companies freer to exploit the taxpayer; - But these are not the only problems. Recently auditors discovered that more than 1 million parts of the F-35 jet have disappeared in the last 5 years; - US officials seem to turn a blind eye to these irregularities, as plane costs continue to rise and the Pentagon continues to overpay for them; - And there is one more additional cost to be remembered: in recent decades the United States has been involved in long, expensive and useless wars such as Iraq and Afghanistan, which also greatly worsened the country's image in the face of the so-called Global South: - As a result, the United States is lagging behind in the technology race, as the Russians and Chinese already have advanced hypersonic missile systems that America lacks, and Iran's growing drone and missile force threatens the American presence in the Middle East. ukposts.infomFS7IvYvv2o
@roverworks4886
@roverworks4886 11 місяців тому
Of course they are over charging, over half of Congress have stock in these companies
@m8kingArt
@m8kingArt 11 місяців тому
This has been an issue for such a long time. I remember seeing a 60 Minutes show 20 years ago about how the Pentagon paid $600 for single toilet seats. Looks like nothing's changed. And I'm sure it won't any time soon. I wish there were more shows that focus on what can be done to change the negative issue, not just on the negative issue itself.
@kiabtoomlauj6249
@kiabtoomlauj6249 11 місяців тому
For those of us, who remember the Reagan Era... yes.... these are guys who want little to no government involvement... on the THINGS THEY WANT businesses to "excel in" usuing "supply and demand" metrics (as they themselves define what those metrics are.... but on things/issues they feel the government MUST regulate, such as human freedom to choose, etc, oh, boy... Clarence Thomas is busy 24/7 scheming ways to TAKE AMERICA back to the Puritanical Age of the 1800s, 1700s, 1600s, etc.
@deanholliday3370
@deanholliday3370 11 місяців тому
absolute proof great grandfathers, grandfathers and parents were all failures....and it continues.
@jonlava173
@jonlava173 11 місяців тому
Totally agree! This has been going on forever. Remember Star Wars under Reagan? The GOP has gotten much worse under Trump and McConnell.
@ag-bk5wf
@ag-bk5wf 11 місяців тому
Toilet seat that need to be of US material and have various tests and traceability with a fai.
@nafnaf0
@nafnaf0 11 місяців тому
A lot of it, is just all the add ons that come with a contract. Everyone has to get theirs. Competition is the only way to keep things in check. Competition will also result in better products.
@studsauce7803
@studsauce7803 11 місяців тому
Any single person that was in the military can agree with this. I was a Bradley systems maintainer and saw parts costs. It’s absolutely insane even what a single bolt costs. I have a feeling there is price kickbacks higher up the chain.
@Blue1Sapphire
@Blue1Sapphire 11 місяців тому
The fish rots from the head . .. so u can be sure it the head is the most rotten part. Just look at the Biden regime. 31 trillion in debt and rising, 3/4 could well have gone to corrupt politicians and their ilk.
@jamesleroy572
@jamesleroy572 11 місяців тому
Boing!
@karniskavva
@karniskavva 11 місяців тому
This old chap should recieve a medal of honor and patriotism!!
@seanoconnell2126
@seanoconnell2126 11 місяців тому
Wow! Thank you 60 Minutes. I have to think this piece is going to upaet some of your advertisers. That shows courage in this day and age. Kudos!
@blinkyjohnson
@blinkyjohnson 11 місяців тому
This is simply outrageous. I’ve never would think that my own country would allow itself to be taken advantage of.
@gotem370
@gotem370 11 місяців тому
really? you aren't aware of how capitalism is designed to work?..... where have you been? streaming Netflix huh, bread and circus
@norm-fy5mo
@norm-fy5mo 11 місяців тому
lol
@skeetrix5577
@skeetrix5577 11 місяців тому
@@gotem370 are you so thick skulled you can't tell OP is being sarcastic? lol you lost
@snowpuddle9622
@snowpuddle9622 11 місяців тому
you thought you're smart?
@veramae4098
@veramae4098 11 місяців тому
Senator Harry Truman, during WW II, led a price gouging investigation. President F.D. Roosevelt thought it wasn't necessary, we'll spend anything. The investigation showed major problems. Truman was raised poor. Roosevelt was raised rich and never had to worry about money. I'm startled "60 Minutes" said this problem started in the 1990's!
@da7heaven
@da7heaven 11 місяців тому
After nearly 40 years in the defense aerospace business, I saw a lot of the problems develop. As mentioned, the mergers and acquisitions that were encouraged and allowed to happen in the 1990's resulted in fewer major contractors and suppliers of critical parts. We have anti-trust laws for a reason and our government chose to ignore them to their own detriment. Some of these suppliers, like Transdigm, even brag in their annual reports to shareholders that the are the sole source for 70% of the items they sell and they can therefore demand high profits. Disgusting. (another cause of these high prices are the government's ridiculous specs, but that's a whole another story)
@josh1800
@josh1800 11 місяців тому
I wish common people understood this. If you're a small manufacture trying to land contracts is almost impossible. Not only do the larger companies keep acquiring smaller ones, they then have a monopoly with acquisitions. SBA/SDV programs really only help for larger companies to use them for the tax breaks. There is no way to compete on government contracts with the specs DOD uses, the suppliers know exactly what it is and what those contracts are fetching so the material is priced high to begin with. Literally can't compete with the big guys because they can afford smaller margins on some projects or to straight up lose money on a contract in order to make money on others. Our manufacturing sector is in BIG TROUBLE and nobody seems to really even be aware or care (Unless you're in the industry)
@TheBooban
@TheBooban 11 місяців тому
@@josh1800 should fix that but also there are foreign companies from Allie’s that could compete too. Sometimes it works (the new FREMM frigate), but mostly they have joint partner with a US one and all the same thing happens. But some stuff, just buy Spike instead of Javelin. Black Panther instead of Abrams. US companies are hurting exports because of the gauging.
@josh1800
@josh1800 11 місяців тому
@@TheBooban The only good thing that's happened to US manufacturing is the Berry Amendment. There's a reason why aircraft/military equipment is our largest export. We need to use a more European model utilizing tariffs to incentivize and rebuild American manufacturing across the board. The US has literally scuttled manufacturing capability by outsourcing to other countries. I couldn't even imagine where the US would be today if the Berry Amendment didn't exist.
@stevechance150
@stevechance150 11 місяців тому
"In Profit We Trust" Isn't that what it says on our currency.
@mattblom3990
@mattblom3990 11 місяців тому
Once I had the US Navy shutdown an entire project because the plastic we were selling as bumpers for wooden piles outside a sub base wouldn't have 25 years of guaranteed UV resistance. When I asked for "proof" of which supplier promised 25 years no UV degradation on this plastic, I was provided with a photograph of a napkin from 1981 saying "No UV damage over 25 years". A napkin. From 1981. From some random salesperson. And the navy kept that and shut down a project because no modern/real supplier could match the napkin scribble.
@aarontrompeterrealestatebr6159
@aarontrompeterrealestatebr6159 11 місяців тому
I sent in $66,000 in to pay taxes last week. This makes me sick. I hate my country some times.
@justgivemethetruth
@justgivemethetruth 8 місяців тому
This is a total outrage.
@kenthoover3573
@kenthoover3573 11 місяців тому
As an engineer working in the defense industry. The biggest lever the government can pull is remove the qualification regulations, it’s so easy to design and build competitive parts! But qualification of the simple components takes millions and years to get approved. It’s the exact same as drug development, too expensive to fund competitors
@BigBoss-sm9xj
@BigBoss-sm9xj 11 місяців тому
what kind of engineer are you ?
@danielwhyatt3278
@danielwhyatt3278 11 місяців тому
That sound like a veeery dangerious thing to do over there in a country like America, BUT it also sounds look a very GOOD IDEA.
@TheTinyGod
@TheTinyGod 11 місяців тому
This is a massive issue, if a candidate made this their primary concern, they'd have my vote forever.
@tonyrandall3146
@tonyrandall3146 11 місяців тому
They might be killed.
@linmal2242
@linmal2242 11 місяців тому
@@tonyrandall3146 Unfortunate auto accident !
@ingothitrust5248
@ingothitrust5248 11 місяців тому
Likely how JFK was wacked.
@BooMaster97
@BooMaster97 11 місяців тому
Weird. It's almost like a recent president had negotiated multiple defense program budgets to be cut... (And he's running again). If only people would pay attention
@onebridge7231
@onebridge7231 7 місяців тому
If they can sue and fine the U.S. Banks billions of dollars, then the U.S. Govt can sue and/or fine these companies billions of dollars as well for price gouging.
@ramal5708
@ramal5708 10 місяців тому
This is what President Eisenhower warned us about in 1960 before Kennedy took his place, he said in his speech "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist." he was right, these contractors are endangering our country.
@jonsmith6591
@jonsmith6591 11 місяців тому
I was working in the VA and there was the same problem , but on the smaller scale- drug and medical equipment manufacturers also gauged the prices like there was no tomorrow. And then something unusual happened - one of the VA integrated service networks (VISN) was allowed to hire an independent contract negotiation team, which got paid on the contingency - I believe they got paid about 20% of the money they saved on the contract after negotiations. Well- maybe Pentagon needs to do the same. Hire an independent team which would scrutinize everything and have them find all the over-changing and price gouging since their fee would depend on the money saved for the DoD. With a lot of the DoD procurement personnel ending as the defense industry lobbyists and consultants , it could be one of the effective measures
@jonathannagela2130
@jonathannagela2130 11 місяців тому
do you think these military creeps and politicians care about saving money? Its like blood to them and they are vampires.
@lew-ejones-ayres5088
@lew-ejones-ayres5088 11 місяців тому
Thats exactly what I thought, incentivised audit of the whole system. Problem is that would stop the pentagon bosses getting their tasty little stock payouts from all the companies they claim to be fighting. Its no accident that the private sector has been allowed to completely monopolise because it still benefits the people at the top
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 11 місяців тому
was just going to say the same.
@bromdulasta
@bromdulasta 11 місяців тому
Best comment! Now how to get it done? These ideas shout make it the decision makers ASAP
@carkawalakhatulistiwa
@carkawalakhatulistiwa 11 місяців тому
12:51 The ultimate goal of capitalism is to get as much profit as possible. to create monopoly and imperialism
@brianag9726
@brianag9726 11 місяців тому
A HUGE waste of our tax dollars.
@eriq54321
@eriq54321 11 місяців тому
I'm glad I'm in the lower part of the tax bracket
@grzyruth9205
@grzyruth9205 11 місяців тому
Not a waste at all if you think about it. These defense company CEOs work harder than anyone in the entire world perhaps, probably clocking in more hours every single week than any welder or warehouse worker I've ever seen. They deserve their private islands and super cars and sex slaves. One day I might be one of these CEOs and it will be because I worked super duper hyper domer hard, putting in 900 hours every week! They deserve what they earned. We shouldn't do anything about it.
@squidwardo7074
@squidwardo7074 11 місяців тому
@@grzyruth9205 we should also drop the minimum wage to 1 cent per month, then give the rest to ceos and politicians
@eholm101
@eholm101 11 місяців тому
@@squidwardo7074 here here! To efficiency!!🥂
@grzyruth9205
@grzyruth9205 11 місяців тому
@@squidwardo7074 EXACTLY! Finally somebody else gets it
@idleoutcaster
@idleoutcaster 8 місяців тому
Hot take: This lies on the Government. I am a Contracts Manager, for years the Government would beg us to take certain hot jobs. We would DECLINE because most commercial companies would pay more for services (Ship Repair). The Government in 1993 “Guys, we are tired of the competition, our heads hurt. Please Monopolize.” 2019: “Guys, there isn’t enough competition, please split up and try again.” The Government enacted something called MACMO, which allows multiple companies to bud on repair of ships. Bit what did the GOV do?! Make it damn near impossible to be a bidder, limiting its own competition. Trust me here all, the GOVERNMENT throws this money at Contractors, then gets mad when they audit the books a year later
@terryshrader3909
@terryshrader3909 11 місяців тому
This is the perfect guy for the job. Kudos to him for being the most hated. He protects that our money the best he can and I bet you hear that accent outside your door in the pentagon hallways and it probably sends chills up generals backs. Good for him. This why civilian oversight is needed.
@missrayelyn3045
@missrayelyn3045 11 місяців тому
Ii worked for a company that is a contractor for Boeing. The particular Boeing site that we contracted with was caught selling used parts as new parts to the military. The top people were fired, and the used parts were replaced with new. Anyone who works in Aerospace knows about price gouging, so i dont understand why this hasnt been delt with a long time ago.
@lubetime-autorepair7078
@lubetime-autorepair7078 11 місяців тому
Because the generals leave the Army and go to advise these people on how to do it. That’s why.
@ShannonLH1108
@ShannonLH1108 11 місяців тому
Because the government agencies or individuals get kick backs. This happens in Arizona.
@jessejamez5985
@jessejamez5985 11 місяців тому
ACCOUNTABILITY! ACCOUNTABILITY! ACCOUNTABILITY!
@idcanthony9286
@idcanthony9286 11 місяців тому
Yup…
@jodygotyourgirlngone
@jodygotyourgirlngone 11 місяців тому
@@lubetime-autorepair7078 Not just Generals...ALL ranks to it.
@TEScharf
@TEScharf 11 місяців тому
A much older problem in the Pentagon is the inability to cancel projects that are failing. Programs like the F35 and the earlier Osprey, are managed by officers who are evaluated for promotion based on the successful completion of their project. 50 years ago, when I was in the USAF, I learned the saying " nobody ever got promoted for killing a Pentagon project." I heard it again later when working in the electronics industry in Silicon Valley. On top of that, these officers are motivated to go soft on the contractors because the relationships developed there lead to jobs with those same contractors after retiring from the military.
@liedebunker1253
@liedebunker1253 11 місяців тому
His life might be in danger for exposing the truth. I'm worried about him.
@lovefortheplant6997
@lovefortheplant6997 11 місяців тому
At one point in my career, I traveled to San Diego fairly regularly. On 3 occasions, I randomly met people who "work" in the military contractor world and they all bragged about how much money they make doing almost nothing in the military complex. There is major corruption going on in the military contractor world and it has been happening for decades - it's just now reached a point where mainstream is recognizing it. One of the guys owned his own contractor company and he told me he has become a millionaire in a short period of time.
@jamesmedina2062
@jamesmedina2062 11 місяців тому
been known for over 35 years if not more by all mainstream media and they kept up the fear tactics and have NEVER given the public the control of the "purse" even though supposedly we elect people to Congress to control the purse
@SlackersIndustry
@SlackersIndustry 11 місяців тому
Yeah worked at a warehouse and only really needed like 10 people had 40, half just sitting around, discraceful
@ralphzoombeenie2330
@ralphzoombeenie2330 11 місяців тому
What bothers me is this is money which could have been spent on bettering the lives of the American people, no more tent cities or crumbling infrastructure. No need to ask how China has progressed so rapidly. They don't allow a small group to rip off government revenue.
@niclasnyberg4173
@niclasnyberg4173 11 місяців тому
@@ralphzoombeenie2330 oh trust me, they still have plenty stealing of taxes. and the thing is half their economy is debt, the feds tell the local leaders how much economic growth they expect and a lot of cities take out loans to start building projects just so they can say they made enough progress. sure they have made great strides but half their economy is a pyramid scheme of foreign investors and they have whole cities that are unfinished and empty. we certainly need a lot of change here at home, the last half century has just been a slide towards corporate rule
@Sweedster
@Sweedster 11 місяців тому
@@ralphzoombeenie2330 well, China’s quality control with construction has proven to be absolutely garbage and corrupt so they might not be the best example
@pulsatingsausageboy2076
@pulsatingsausageboy2076 11 місяців тому
This has literally been going on for several decades. This could be avoided if our government wasn’t so obsessed with privatizing everything.
@easwarsankar
@easwarsankar 11 місяців тому
Where do you think the magical urge to privatize everything comes from? The defense contractors grease the palms of the politicians to keep the gravy flowing, all the while they keep arguing that the budget needs to be cut for food stamps, child care or education
@houston4848
@houston4848 11 місяців тому
I could not agree more.
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 11 місяців тому
Or use 3 contractors to make the same part. That contract gets reevaluated every 2 years. Whoever builds the part with the lowest failure rate and lowest cost gets 50% if the contract and the other 2 get 25% each. That could also mean that the F-35 would be built by Lockheed Martin as the Primary, Boeing as the secondary and Northrop Grumman as the 3rd company.
@danielwhyatt3278
@danielwhyatt3278 11 місяців тому
@@pogo1140 You are 100% right. This's what we've a been saying here in the UK for yeeears. And especially so over the past year when it comes to renewing stocks in your country with the current ones rightly going to Ukraine. Sooo many supplies, especially MLRS like the Javelin are taking foreeeveeer to be restocked (and I am SURE it's still happening) become they all come from one supplier who also has a manopoly on the price. This's just so STUPID and criminal.
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 11 місяців тому
@@danielwhyatt3278 Yep, Patriot missiles were being built at 250 missiles a year, it's taken a year to increase that to 500/yr and 550/yr by the end of this year, and we are paying 30% more per missile than we should be.
@rockyboustani4503
@rockyboustani4503 11 місяців тому
Controlling price gouging by defense contractors involves implementing effective measures and regulations. Here are some potential solutions: 1. Competition and Transparency: Encourage competition among defense contractors by promoting transparency in the bidding and procurement process. This can help prevent monopolistic practices and foster fair pricing. 2. Strong Contract Management: Enhance oversight and monitoring of defense contracts to ensure compliance with agreed-upon terms and pricing structures. Regular audits and reviews can help identify and address any potential price gouging. 3. Cost Estimation and Benchmarking: Develop robust cost estimation methodologies to determine fair and reasonable pricing for defense contracts. Benchmarking against similar projects or industry standards can provide a reference point for evaluating prices. 4. Negotiation and Price Caps: Engage in effective negotiation strategies to obtain fair and reasonable prices. Implement price caps or price adjustment mechanisms to limit excessive price increases. 5. Long-Term Planning: Encourage long-term planning and stable funding for defense projects to reduce uncertainty and prevent last-minute rush orders that may be vulnerable to price gouging. 6. Collaboration with Industry: Foster collaboration and communication between government agencies and defense contractors to establish a shared understanding of pricing concerns. This can lead to mutually beneficial solutions and improved cost management. 7. Enhanced Oversight and Penalties: Strengthen regulatory oversight and enforcement mechanisms to deter price gouging. Implement penalties and consequences for contractors found engaging in unfair pricing practices. It's important to note that controlling price gouging is a complex task that requires a multi-faceted approach involving legislative measures, effective governance, and cooperation between the government and defense contractors.
@Youchubeswindon
@Youchubeswindon 9 місяців тому
I completely agree with every one of your statements, however there is an 8th and 9th point I would like to add. 8. Specification Simplification. Either allowing sole sourcing new supplier simplification when supplier meets known best practices previously noted (including hitting pricing estimates) or broadening specifications, and prioritising requirements. For example, its this colour because everything else is this colour, and it was some paint we got down home depot, or this paint has this very specific stealth technologies, but we don't care about it's viscosity. 9. Harmonisation with Industry standards. One of the commenters noted that their stock was simplified to a pack of 5 items for 75c and the whole gamut of industry could deal with this. However DoD purchasers needed 4 or 6 (in just the same way as the rest of the industry), but forced repacking and new sku's and so the price was $20, instead of discarding unused items from 1 or multiple packs of 5.
@RoadDawgLife
@RoadDawgLife 11 місяців тому
Thank you 60 Minutes.
@ash283880
@ash283880 11 місяців тому
The annual 60 minutes special on defense overspending. Nothing gets done because everyone's hand is in the till.
@kalinda619
@kalinda619 11 місяців тому
*because Congress is useless
@Est578
@Est578 11 місяців тому
A very similar thing happens at the VA, where the medical device companies rake in a ton of money. The VA is not allowed to negotiate prices and has to pay "list price." Whereas the non-government hospital I work for can and does negotiate prices and pays a fraction of what the government does. So sad.
@MrKim-kv2vv
@MrKim-kv2vv 11 місяців тому
Along with “claim it, you earned it” mentality VA encouraging veterans… 🙋🏼
@user-kg5ut5fc1f
@user-kg5ut5fc1f 11 місяців тому
Thank you.
@messagesystem333
@messagesystem333 11 місяців тому
Been happening for a long time. Eisenhower warned us about it.
@Todd3246
@Todd3246 11 місяців тому
Happens in Australia as well. I needed a socket to do a brake adjustment for some equipment in a missile guided frigate and was told around $140. A dockyard worker overheard me talk about it and got it through his company for $35.
@danielwhyatt3278
@danielwhyatt3278 11 місяців тому
Yiiikes mate. I wonder how it campares then to here in Britain. I betting still both our countries are paying a loooot less for those though when compared to over in the States. God they're nuts.
@joelc9439
@joelc9439 11 місяців тому
The US has a lot more equipment, that's why. And the US has much bigger equipment... The same with Canada, Saudi Arabia and all these countries.
@anotherdave5107
@anotherdave5107 11 місяців тому
Did the $35 socket meet mil spec? Does the contract require the contractor to use mil spec equipment?
@timinwsac
@timinwsac 11 місяців тому
@@anotherdave5107 And that's the problem, it's all the paperwork testing and inspection that goes with that tool that you can buy at home depot for nine dollars.
@yifanfei8277
@yifanfei8277 11 місяців тому
Does the same $35 part not need to meet specific standards? You certainly saved through another company but doesn’t the bureaucracy stop you from purchasing through non-government approved sources?
@IamGoen
@IamGoen 11 місяців тому
You can't just blame the contractors, you also have to blame our government officials for not caring and allowing this abuse (theft) at the tax payers expense!
@sergegainsbourgii1852
@sergegainsbourgii1852 11 місяців тому
Lol- Reaganomics!
@rayz9865
@rayz9865 11 місяців тому
Yup. The congress members who keep pushing for more funding are the ones who have stock in these companies
@azeketuran9232
@azeketuran9232 11 місяців тому
because government officials might be involved who knows, but I feel bad for taxpayers :(
@stephenwest6738
@stephenwest6738 11 місяців тому
It lands squarely on the contractors. You can blame the victim for being taken, and say they must be crooked, but the reality is they don't have a choice. They either approve budgets or they are replaced. Period.
@DigD97
@DigD97 11 місяців тому
That's how officials who get elected one year and become multi millionaires the next year are made!
@blaphtome9382
@blaphtome9382 11 місяців тому
Imagine just now finding this out
@GrAnDmAMiTtEnSS
@GrAnDmAMiTtEnSS 10 місяців тому
The type of reporting that needs to reach all Americans. Fix our military spending!
@zackkennedy9266
@zackkennedy9266 11 місяців тому
Being in the military many of us were shocked looking at how much things cost. Glad someone if finally pointing it out.
@razmodasser
@razmodasser 11 місяців тому
Pretty sure the politicians are involved with this. Send them all to jail!
@blinkyjohnson
@blinkyjohnson 11 місяців тому
Have been for decades. They receive financial kickbacks from these corporate contractors, it’s a vicious cycle that never ends.
@SM-xo3dv
@SM-xo3dv 11 місяців тому
For sure!...Kickbacks and corruption rule the world...sadly said!
@kaptainkaos1202
@kaptainkaos1202 11 місяців тому
They are. I’m working an aircraft that was mandated for the military to buy. It’s horrible! The build quality is that of a hobbyist nature and it’s the worst I’ve ever seen.
@halclayton3048
@halclayton3048 11 місяців тому
Damn right!
@veramae4098
@veramae4098 11 місяців тому
Everyone in Congress can use their knowledge of legislation about to be passed, to invest in those areas. In particular, many reps and Senators buy stock in defense contractors, so the more that's voted into the defense budget, the more they make.
@GUNNERSIGHTZEROED
@GUNNERSIGHTZEROED 11 місяців тому
Keep the money at home not corrupt Ukraine!
@MrMountain707
@MrMountain707 8 місяців тому
Now this is journalism. More of this!
@Gabe-bz9nk
@Gabe-bz9nk 11 місяців тому
Corporations that do price gouging should be put in the spot light and be taken accountable
@msimon6808
@msimon6808 11 місяців тому
It is all done according to regulation. All the overcharging is due to Government rules and connivance. We have strict accounting to insure that. The main grift was "contract change".
@robertmorin6495
@robertmorin6495 11 місяців тому
@@msimon6808 Why would the government make rules to rip itself off? That doesn't make sense.
@j.c.4192
@j.c.4192 11 місяців тому
@@robertmorin6495 it's the same group of people making the rules going through revolving doors.
@daeclipse03
@daeclipse03 11 місяців тому
Of course they should. First we need competition to them as they are the only suppliers for crucial weapons systems.
@sergegainsbourgii1852
@sergegainsbourgii1852 11 місяців тому
Why it's absurd that corporations have been given personhood, when they aren't held accountable like people.
@BrahmBones
@BrahmBones 11 місяців тому
Easy fix; reverse engineer the parts for yourself and then hold the companies up in patent violation litigation for years until they drop the prices.
@CReesman
@CReesman 11 місяців тому
Not surprised by any of this at all, sad. Really enjoy watching the in-depth journalism of 60 minutes.
@Manhandle730
@Manhandle730 11 місяців тому
Wait a damn minute…..does everyone have amnesia?! I’m 44 and I remember this being common knowledge that it happens with everything the Government buys. Not only in the defense side of things but literally with everything.
@donaldsebolt6890
@donaldsebolt6890 11 місяців тому
This is treasonous by the contractors and those involved all need to be put in prison.
@EnragedEagle
@EnragedEagle 11 місяців тому
Put half of Congress in there with them. They won't even ban themselves from insider trading, all complicit in the theft from the working class
@nafnaf0
@nafnaf0 11 місяців тому
They usually aren't doing anything unlawful. Competition is the only way to keep things in check. Competition will also result in better products.
@Stack4Freedom
@Stack4Freedom 11 місяців тому
@@nafnaf0 except where there isn’t any competition leading to unchecked price hikes
@thurlravenscroft2572
@thurlravenscroft2572 11 місяців тому
I go through this every day. Just went through contract negotiation with a major defense contractor. The standard answer from my superiors when I point these things out is: “they’re a sole-source OEM, what else can we do?” It makes me sick!
@lauranydb7979
@lauranydb7979 11 місяців тому
report them to the attorney general? Head of the defense auditing dept?
@reggaefan2700
@reggaefan2700 11 місяців тому
You can shame them.
@timothyryan8622
@timothyryan8622 11 місяців тому
But if you miss $1 on your taxes, you can go to prison.....
@nastystew6942
@nastystew6942 11 місяців тому
I was a contractor and in the Army, I can assure you that the military is over spending 10 fold. I worked in a warehouse and there was a bolt 🔩 that cost $200.00. Ridiculous! That's just one bolt.
@cases2939
@cases2939 11 місяців тому
We must hold our elected officials accountable.
@IamCaleum
@IamCaleum 11 місяців тому
These companies should either be nationalized or the leadership should be locked up. We should be able to sue these companies into the ground until this stops.
@kaptainkaos1202
@kaptainkaos1202 11 місяців тому
Nationalized? Are you kidding? I am a federal employee so I see how the government works daily. Would I want a company run that way? Heck no!
@halclayton3048
@halclayton3048 11 місяців тому
I'M WITH YOU MIKE!!! YES SIR!!
@_ArsNova
@_ArsNova 11 місяців тому
Well you can't just "nationalize" companies at will. It is both highly illegal and unethical, price gouging or no. Simply address the issue of overcharging instead of calling for illegal, childish, power fantasies.
@gomahklawm4446
@gomahklawm4446 11 місяців тому
They are in a way, but the WORST way. They are publicly declared "strategic producers"....meaning that we will never allow them to go bankrupt, no matter what. That's why this is allowed. It's sickening.
@Munin497
@Munin497 11 місяців тому
If companies create monopolies in the defense sector and use that to systematically overcharge taxpayers then nationalization is a completely reasonable response. Not least as a warning to other companies that try similar things. There is no reason to respect the rights of companies that actively undermine the free market.
@KarmicJustice10424
@KarmicJustice10424 11 місяців тому
I say if these defense contractors want to price gouge, then the government should hike their tax rates. And if they have the balls to threaten that they would sell military secrets to other nations, then prosecute them as the traitors that they are. It's a national shame that we spend so much on our military budget, yet we pay our soldiers so little, and the VA benefits keep getting worse, while the budget is constantly increasing...
@ColMike-om6ue
@ColMike-om6ue 11 місяців тому
Think about our Congress debating a debt ceiling. Now think again.
@MattTee1975
@MattTee1975 11 місяців тому
1. This has been going on for decades. 2. Anyone who has ever been anywhere near government has always known this to be the case.
@warrenjoseph76
@warrenjoseph76 11 місяців тому
This is great reporting
@jessejamez5985
@jessejamez5985 11 місяців тому
ACCOUNTABILITY! ACCOUNTABILITY! ACCOUNTABILITY!
@amazingartifacts
@amazingartifacts 11 місяців тому
The fact that the government’s top military equipment negotiator called a rifle magazine a “CLIP” is very troubling.. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
@edkrach8891
@edkrach8891 11 місяців тому
You don't release good workers who are trying to cut the price gouging. The govt. FUBARed itself on that one. NOW is the time to get aggressive with these companies and hold them accountable.
@ryannln8345
@ryannln8345 11 місяців тому
"War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses." Smedley Butler
@arvont1
@arvont1 11 місяців тому
*Major General Smedley Butler, the most decorated US soldier in history. Among other achievements, he exposed the Business Plot, where wealthy industrialists were planning an military coup to overthrow FDR. We should all take his words to heart.
@Cosmo679
@Cosmo679 11 місяців тому
war is a method of Racking in profits
@vitovitale169
@vitovitale169 11 місяців тому
I don't know what the current situation is but I had a good friend while living in England who owned a salvage/wreck yard which specialized in US vehicles back in the 1990's. He had a pass to enter practically any US base in Europe which he would regularly visit to purchase damaged military vehicles for pennies on the dollar. He stated because their vehicles had no insurance when they were damaged however lightly they would be parked up and replaced and sold to whoever like himself knew the right people to negotiate with (usually the base commanders) to acquire them with clean titles. Most he would drive back home vehicles with less than 10K miles with broken windshields and complete with all their medical equipment (like ambulances or fire trucks and buses) and sell them at huge profits or rented them once repaired to Hollywood production companies making movies in England.
@vengeancewillbemine3440
@vengeancewillbemine3440 11 місяців тому
This man is a national hero 👏 for speaking out on this.
@briansymmes7917
@briansymmes7917 11 місяців тому
When you have no real boundaries between the military-industrial complex, the Pentagon, and your politicians on both sides, you have a serious problem.
@dawsonpurkett7709
@dawsonpurkett7709 11 місяців тому
Im surprised that they put this story out. It’s actual journalism for an actual problem
@bobbaguy1429
@bobbaguy1429 11 місяців тому
I'm glad this is getting picked up, when I was in the service this was one of my main concerns, I saw how much we paid for equipment and how little we used it, and how little we did know how to use it. It was like a giant junk hoarding scheme at the expense of the taxpayers. Kinda realized that I was contributing to a systemic issue that was hurting more people than it was supposed to help. I think we have a corruption issue going on between government and military contractors, and that we need to pay more attention to this.
@spectreshadow
@spectreshadow 11 місяців тому
This is the military industrial complex working as intended. A feature, not a bug.
@manzchello4752
@manzchello4752 3 місяці тому
This alone puts us behind on technology we need. And could cost us the entire country and future if we are attacked. I hate these companies now.
@offshorebear
@offshorebear 11 місяців тому
This guy needs to go to jail. The NSN price for an A200-PSO is $308.00. If he paid 10 grand for it; that is on him. He violated every rule in defense procurement.
@D-Nice358
@D-Nice358 11 місяців тому
We Need More Honorable Men Like This Defending & Saving our🇺🇲 Country🇺🇲👍
@vrr6368
@vrr6368 11 місяців тому
Finally some good investigative journalism
@tiptoe38
@tiptoe38 11 місяців тому
Still nothing will change.
@Utrechtborn
@Utrechtborn 11 місяців тому
😂
@samuelchappell7280
@samuelchappell7280 11 місяців тому
@12:51 - this man and woman hit the nail on the head when they said the word "monopoly." The U.S. Government has laws meant to be used to break up companies with a monopoly on certain goods and services. Why hasn't the government utilized these laws in order to break up these companies in order to secure better deals for the government.
@turksinnovations
@turksinnovations 11 місяців тому
Prices for Javelins, B2s, F-22s etc should be reevaluated.
@hm3drake35
@hm3drake35 11 місяців тому
Reminds me of that scene in Independence day when the President asks "where's does funding come for all this???!!!" and Julius says... "you don't really think they paid $20K for hammer or $30K for toilet seat... DO YOU?
@warrenjoseph76
@warrenjoseph76 11 місяців тому
Bingo
@jerrypanela
@jerrypanela 11 місяців тому
Unacknowledged projects.
@zachbowman9396
@zachbowman9396 11 місяців тому
@@jerrypanela, Shhhhh we don't speak of the Black Budget here, if people on this thread really knew of the over spending on Black Projects that money gets poured into then these projects get canceled after spending millions if not billions in R&D . In total over 60 billion in spending in 2022, but the funding from the Black Budget is a whole other rabbit hole to go down .
@killersugar6816
@killersugar6816 11 місяців тому
Wow… that’s an old movie now days, and this problem was even mentioned there?
@dallasyap3064
@dallasyap3064 11 місяців тому
That's also what I thought too. Black budgets.
@RiverRat_1977
@RiverRat_1977 11 місяців тому
A close friend was employed by the nation’s largest military contractor from 1961 until he retired in 1997. He started as a subcontracts analyst, then became a contract analyst, until he was promoted to being a contract negotiator. During his career he was constantly shuttling around between dozens of contractors in order to get the best prices on components. He was away from home and flying around the country for weeks at a time, always trying to get the best prices on the components they needed to procure, from any number of subcontractors who were also competing to sell their latest offerings. What he put together in the end meant the difference between winning a competitive bid or not! Anything that was tasked for design, development, and engineering by his employer was closely monitored by government auditors so the government knew exactly what they were paying, and what they were getting in return for their investment. Still, his employer was under constant scrutiny by the government’s auditors so that any cost overruns were accounted for absolutely, or else the contractor would not get paid more than what the govt auditors assessed as the fair price, allowing for the costs of engineering and development, plus a fixed profit margin of 10-15%. A healthy ROI!! Occasionally the govt needed something done in a hurry and was willing to waive some cost overruns in order to get those items as soon as possible, but the profit margin was still capped at its usual rate. And if the contractor could deliver the items needed before a certain date (tested and certified), the contractor received a bonus for their efforts. But the auditors were still there every step of the way, constantly evaluating every possible factor and making sure they only paid for the items contracted, and they scrutinised every financial transaction in order to ensure that contracted costs they budgeted for stayed inline. There was a lot of competition at the time, and companies rightfully needed to make a profit for their work. So the govt auditors had other contractor’s bids to compare costs… Which had to be broken down into every detail from design and engineering to testing and making any necessary modifications and improvements, to assembly and manufacturing, plus final tests for certification to mil-specs! Everything was very rigid since these were military components and couldn’t be lacking in quality and reliability because lives depended on these components i.e. Failure was not acceptable and could cause a contractor or subcontractor to lose their military certification!! I was always impressed by how well the government oversight kept a tight reign on costs and didn’t hesitate to drop a contract if cost overruns were repeatedly excessive, because the govt had a multitude of other contractors they could turn to if that ever became necessary! But that was during the late 1970’s. Currently, I don’t know why the government and our military would let the American taxpayers get cheated out of so much money, because they’re only shortchanging our military’s strength and effectiveness, and at the times where we need to be at our best, with 100% reliable readiness. Their greed is transparent to the rest of the world, which is probably to most disturbing aspect of our military. And contributes to our armed forces inability to attract quality people willing to serve! The fact that lobbyists and corruption has taken hold of our congress and military procurement officials is proof that these auditors need to be brought back with the order to fix the system or else resign, and we’ll hire the right people who are willing to get the job done!! If my friend was still alive- he would be appalled at the lack of oversight that has led to all this runaway spending. His solid integrity is what I admired most about him! There was a time our military or government could put up a certain item for bid and at least 4-5 contractors were there with their sealed bids, and all hoping to win that contract! Those days are gone due to Reagan’s downsizing and removal of the people responsible for rooting out these massive cost overruns… As if a for profit corporation isn’t going to do what’s in THEIR best interests, instead of making sure we have a continually healthy military budget, and the best equipped soldiers in the world. And now the GOP wants to slash our military budget (and veterans care). But nothing is said about rooting out the corruption that has led to price gouging and redundant spending!! Threats to defund the Ukraine war will only expose our NATO allies to a higher threat level, which in turn will immediately escalate our need to possibly become directly entangled in their war… at a time when we can still help them fight and succeed, yet maintain our readiness at 100% should the need arise to defend Taiwan and any other countries China would seek to exploit by our weakness and unpreparedness. During WWII, the Korean War, and into part of the Vietnam war, all heavy munitions were made at military weapons manufacturing depots… which have all been closed (except for most of our nuclear weapons facilities). The manufacturing of heavy munitions has been completely privatized, which has allowed for the astronomical procurement costs we’re now seeing! Plus failures of so called “smart weapons systems” has never been higher, which is evident of cutting corners on materials used, parts quality, plus a lack of testing for quality control and quality assurance. These failures cost lives!!! Many of these weapons manufacturing depots were on military bases, and most are still there… just sitting idle. So If we’re still paying for the design, development, and manufacture of these new weapons systems, get rid of these extravagant middlemen and take back our own munitions manufacturing once again. It’s time to make these budgets lean, but the only way is to cut out greedy profiteers and restore oversight both internally and externally to military contractors who started on their own from the ground up to build the larger aircraft and military weapons systems we now have because of their partnership with the US government and our military. But their cost overruns are inexcusable and this is what warrants the return of a new department of auditors and cost analysts, otherwise this excessive spending will continue to go on unchecked, while our military defense and preparedness suffers, and in full public view!!
@whitemailprivilege2830
@whitemailprivilege2830 11 місяців тому
Cool story bro 😎
@JackMee-hOFF-Jr.
@JackMee-hOFF-Jr. 11 місяців тому
Great read. Thank you.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 11 місяців тому
Thanks for sharing your extensive experience. I saw a lot of things in the segment that concerned me but at the same time they mentioned something about 12% profit. 12% is not out of line and it actually sounds kind of low to me. When they talked about how much money the companies make they didn't mention whether or not that includes research and development and other expenditures or if it's just the cost of manufacturing. The segment left a lot of important details vaguely explained if at all. Knowing the bias of this network I'm skeptical that they painted an accurate picture of the situation, but at the same time I'm not completely dismissing it. I think there were a lot of good points to be concerned about.
@cheezus9625
@cheezus9625 11 місяців тому
I ain't reading all that but, damn that's crazy
@travelinman70
@travelinman70 11 місяців тому
I'm a career CPA Auditor with for profit companies, but had a stint at a DoD contractor as the internal audit chief. So I interfaced with these government auditors, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). When an accountant finishes college, the people with personality and brains go to accounting firms. The people with hard work ethic go to companies. The barely squeaked by people that were in class but had nothing to add, they went to work for the government. These DCAA are the least thinking accountants I have ever met. They have no understanding of risks, basis for estimates, or what is reasonable. So, don't count on these auditors to find anything of value, they are useless. And shame on the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) for signing these contracts. They are the reason companies are allowed to charge what they charge.
@TesserId
@TesserId 11 місяців тому
My Father, as an engineer in the Navy Dept., used to be evaluate testing of aircraft survivability. At one time, he found some concerns that he wanted to comment on and was told: no, no you only get to give pass/fail evaluations; commentary is not allowed.
@texasaggie85
@texasaggie85 11 місяців тому
Good reporting! Let’s see what comes of it
@Trooper6190
@Trooper6190 11 місяців тому
“You don’t actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?” Julius Levinson
@Gambit22003
@Gambit22003 11 місяців тому
I worked in 2005 for Lockheed Martin in Ft. Polk, La. We rebuilt Humvees in my particular Motor pool. We received the parts in huge boxes brought to us on forklifted pallets. We had to inventory and account for every part, including down to single nuts, bolts, and washers. The price the Government paid for each was listed, and it was disturbingly disgusting. A single, tiny washer, was over $5.50 each. Edit: For context and comparison, a single washer of the same size will cost roughly a dime at Lowe's or Home Depot. A dime washer, Government paid over 5 dollars for. 🙄🤦
@BLACKAAROW
@BLACKAAROW 11 місяців тому
Wtf 😳 why can’t the govt just buy the the washers, bolts etc straight from Lowe’s rather than going through 3rd party contractors??
@icurnvs776
@icurnvs776 11 місяців тому
@@BLACKAAROW The military industrial complex, lobbying, and corruption is why.
@batcatd6272
@batcatd6272 11 місяців тому
​@Leviathan88 because the manufacturer told them it's only parts that can be use in the vehicle. As a commander, if you decide not to use their parts, and something happened to the vehicle because of it, you will be held responsible. Most likely lose your command, force retirement or worse get kick out of military.
@Djjohnnyg415
@Djjohnnyg415 11 місяців тому
I come home from work uncertain about the affairs of the world, but I sleep easier knowing THE TRUTH, and being more prepared for tomorrow, armed with information that’ll better my decision making. Thank you for what you do, from a fellow American in the California.
@kennethwise7108
@kennethwise7108 11 місяців тому
I work with Government contracts on a daily basis and sadly we have no ownership of the property to include drawings.The vendors have the upper hand with Sole Source being utilized and that does away with the competitive aspect of how we obtain our spares (AMC code 1 or 2). You can thank those folks who are WAY high up on the Totem pole for allowing that to happen. Additionally, our Military doesn't make anything anymore. If we were able to do so we could produce things ourselves! Again, ALL of these things were done by folks in a MUCH higher pay grade than I am. 2.5 years away from retirement and it couldn't come soon enough.
Why the US Military Costs so Much
23:08
Wendover Productions
Переглядів 2 млн
Kitten has a slime in her diaper?! 🙀 #cat #kitten #cute
00:28
Пескоструйный АППАРАТ! #shorts
01:00
Гараж 54
Переглядів 2,8 млн
Why France is Preparing for War
31:54
Task & Purpose
Переглядів 3,9 млн
The most important country you’ve never heard about
28:13
Johnny Harris
Переглядів 792 тис.
How Arming Ukraine Exposed Cracks in the U.S. Defense Supply Chain | WSJ
8:44
The Wall Street Journal
Переглядів 741 тис.
Artificial Intelligence | 60 Minutes Full Episodes
53:30
60 Minutes
Переглядів 6 млн
How Defense Contractors Make Billions Off Missile Sales
10:47