By the way, my roommate was a sincerely honest man✌️🙏🤷‍♂️

Did your roommate have multiple rule books? I can't trust an ump that doesn't have at least 40 years of rule books.

@@robcoop6521 I will say that after critical (controversial) calls, both team managers and players complemented their trust that his call was correct

Winners win losers lose …it’s really about having fun ✌️🙏

Spoken like a true pompous ass.

At the very least it's the mindset I want to see in making calls.

One of the biggest @$$#*!€$ to ever play the game

More than likely arguing strike two

It can happen at any time. Back in the 70s, Orioles manager Earl Weaver once got ejected during the pre-game lineup exchange.

@@Koyasama Yeah I heard he somehow got ejected thrice in a 2-game series.

I hear there is a system being developed that will actually accurately track where the ball is within the strike zone for real time review, and I can't wait to see Angel's terrible job FINALLY be officially recognized. May take another year or two, but it will be a glorious day when it finally happens.

@k1productions87 This sounds amazing. My worry is that the minute this system is complete, the Umpires' Union will sue the league because it will cut some of their jobs, and we all know some of them need to see the unemployment line.

@@nyfinest017 the umpire will still be there. Its just for the purpose of review. And would only really happen at Home Plate, leaving all the other field locations still manned. Hopefully only by those who had proven themselves reliable, keeping blowhards like Angel behind the plate and constantly under review. i.e. "do your job better, dickhead"

Fire Rob Manfred!

Honestly MLB seems to be the only league of any sport that flat-out refuses to allow such review.

Theres ejections in other sports, just less common

@@logana5479 Players, yes, but the coach?

The NHL let's the refs remove the coach occasionally. It's rare though.

That was a home run !!!

Not the only place Lewin is missed…

I don't agree. Lackey didn't COME CLOSE to throwing a pitch. What should the Ump have done, let him keep throwing at the guy?

@@dougamundson6836 Official warning must come first. Further, there are other calls in this video besides that singular one. Like all those who get ejected for saying something, raising their hands in the air, or so much as glancing in the Umpire's general direction. I don't give a damn what words come out of a player's mouth; if there is no physical contact with the Umpire, there shall be no ejection, ESPECAILLY without official warning.

@@k1productions87 So, what you are saying is: when a pitcher throws at a batter's head, he only gets a warning? Anybody with a brain can see certain things. When a pitcher threw at George Brett's head in the first inning, the guy should have been thrown out. No warning, no extra warmups for the replacement. EVERYBODY knew what was going on.

@@dougamundson6836 Firstly, pitchers have been giving "chin music" for decades, if not over a century at this point. Secondly, that's not the only ejection on this video. Did you not READ what I had said, before @'ing me in your response? Clearly not, because I was quite specifically talking about those being ejected for SAYING things, not throwing at a batter's head. So, NO, I was NOT saying what you apparently thought I was saying, since you obviously like making stuff up that people OBVIOUSLY didn't say.

@@k1productions87 I agree, up to a point. But anybody that thinks that he wasn't throwing at Brett's head is an idiot. So: should a pitcher be allowed to throw at a batter's head with no repurcussions? Please answer.

No they don’t. You have no idea what was said between them. It may not look like anything but it’s in the rule “you can’t argue balls and strikes” if you do you run the risk of being ejected. Not one umpire on here showed anyone up.

@@lscales6131 omg thank you for your opinion.. we all would be lost without you.. 'the expert' giving us his opinion . I am pretty sure I saw a picture of you in the baseball hall of fame

​@@lscales6131anymore, you can't argue ANYTHING with the umpires.

@@lscales6131 Ejection should only occur if you lay a finger (or any body part) upon the umpire. Besides,... with how bullshit some of the Umpire's ball and strike calls have been, they NEED to be argued. Literally every other sport has the ability to challenge the call on plays,... yet Baseball flat-out refuses to ever allow this at home plate. Why?

@@k1productions87 no they don’t not on judgment calls. Can you challenge a holding penalty in NFL? Or a hooking penalty in NHL? No that’s why balls and strikes are judgment calls and it’s in the rules you can argue balls and strikes. They allow for most if not all other calls.

We'll see when the new system goes into effect, that will accurately measure the strike zone in real time, so there will finally be official record of how absolutely terrible some of the Home Plate Umpire's truly are at their job (lookin' at you, Angel Hernandez)

Entitled millionaires? The rule used to be that you get ejected if you make physical contact with the umpire. The players didn't change that rule, the Umpires did, as well as blocking any semblance of review (despite literally every single other sport allowing plays to be reviewed, in case of bad calls). Who are the entitled ones here?

Everyone is lawsuit happy with no manhood If someone got knocked out, they'd sue, because they are cowards The rest of the players want to do something, but being banned from baseball and arrested is not worth losing the money they are making If they only payed the players up to a million a year even a max contract should be a million max If they made less money like in the old days, they'd have more gumption to be a man, from what I think NHL players make nothing compared to MLB players and they fight every time they need to or want to

Nine eleven

I swear, they think they're WWE referees or something.