Multiverse: One Universe or Many?

  Переглядів 3,450,420

World Science Festival

World Science Festival

День тому

The inflationary theory of cosmology, an enduring theory about our universe and how it was formed, explains that just after the Big Bang, the universe went through a period of rapid expansion. This theory has been critical to understanding what’s going on in the cosmos today. But now, this long-held notion-which seems to suggest as-yet-unproven and perhaps unprovable features such as the multiverse-is under increasing attack. Through informed debate among architects of the inflationary theory and its prime competitors, this program explored our best attempts to understand where we came from.
This program is part of the Big Ideas Series
The World Science Festival gathers great minds in science and the arts to produce live and digital content that allows a broad general audience to engage with scientific discoveries. Our mission is to cultivate a general public informed by science, inspired by its wonder, convinced of its value, and prepared to engage with its implications for the future.
Subscribe to our UKposts Channel for all the latest from WSF.
Visit our Website: www.worldsciencefestival.com/
Like us on Facebook: / worldscience. .
Follow us on twitter: / worldscifest
Original Program Date: June 1, 2013
MODERATOR: John Hockenberry
PARTICIPANTS: Andreas Albrecht, Alan Guth, Andrei Linde, Neil Turok
Multiverse: In the Beginning 00:00
John Hockenberry's Introduction 4:33
Participant Introductions 6:35
The Big Bang theory. 8:34
The vacuum of space and the Higgs field. 12:33
What is inflationary theory? 15:40
What does the inflationary model explain? 21:36
What is the experimental evidence of the multiverse? 26:22
What is so exciting about the Planck satellite?31:56
The CMB and what it means to a multiverse. 40:43
What came before the big bang? 46:45
Does string theory help predict there is a multiverse? 53:45
Having no choice is a hard choice to make. 1:00:33
Is the horizon of a black hole is much like the edge of the universe? 1:05:11
Is there a difference between a multiverse and two universes colliding? 1:11:23
Depending on infinity for predictions. 1:16:15

КОМЕНТАРІ: 2 800
@WorldScienceFestival
@WorldScienceFestival 6 років тому
Hello, UKpostsrs. The World Science Festival is looking for enthusiastic translation ambassadors for its UKposts translation project. To get started, all you need is a Google account. Check out Multiverse: One Universe or Many? to see how the process works: ukposts.info_video?v=aUW7patpm9s&ref=share To create your translation, just type along with the video and save when done. Check out the full list of programs that you can contribute to here: ukposts.info_cs_panel?c=UCShHFwKyhcDo3g7hr4f1R8A&tab=2 The World Science Festival strives to cultivate a general public that's informed and awed by science. Thanks to your contributions, we can continue to share the wonder of scientific discoveries with the world.
@michgingras
@michgingras 6 років тому
sorry i do not have a google account :( DHU !
@KVBreezy
@KVBreezy 5 років тому
😋😋
@5tonyvvvv
@5tonyvvvv 5 років тому
Hey atheists, what was the mechanism that triggered the big bang or big bangs???
@markhughes8387
@markhughes8387 5 років тому
Dunno, mate, but we'll keep looking, and if we find an answer, you can bet it'll be better than "Some hairy bloke wot lives in a cloud did it.".
@michaelgablecolvin7949
@michaelgablecolvin7949 5 років тому
Mark Hughes Hairy ??? lol
@psyche._6890
@psyche._6890 3 роки тому
"Could your fish brain handle that?" I have never been more offended :]
@JM-pi2vc
@JM-pi2vc 3 роки тому
😄
@tmseh
@tmseh 2 роки тому
Your offense offends me madam!
@paulgray2928
@paulgray2928 2 роки тому
Of course you're bloody offended lol
@tmseh
@tmseh 2 роки тому
@Elon Musk Bitcoin hasn't budged since you posted your comment. I got all excited bruh.
@tmseh
@tmseh 2 роки тому
@Elon Musk Thanks Rocket Man!!!! I'm going to be riiiiiiiiich! Filthy, filthy rich......... wait,..16%,....14%......so rich.
@benjaminseng4271
@benjaminseng4271 4 роки тому
"I'm a theoretical physicist" "oh, whats that mean" _ "I get paid to confuse the shit out of myself and everyone around me. However on the off chance I discover something miraculous it will probably be used to destroy civilization"
@TheJunglejim1971
@TheJunglejim1971 3 роки тому
it seems to me that everyone in physics is over looking 1 very important factor regardless if we have one universe or a multiverse
@TheJunglejim1971
@TheJunglejim1971 3 роки тому
lets see how if you can pick it
@burnsmybritches5857
@burnsmybritches5857 3 роки тому
All it means is you like to play with numbers
@slevinchannel7589
@slevinchannel7589 3 роки тому
Certainly not just One Universe. It's just more Logical. It just makes more Sense.
@allensmith342
@allensmith342 3 роки тому
@@slevinchannel7589 It Makes About As Much Sense As Why You Feel The Need To Capitalize The First Letter Of Nearly Every Word In Your Sentences. Certainly just One Universe. It's just more Logical. It just makes more Sense.
@lyleshuey2108
@lyleshuey2108 3 роки тому
Traveling with all of this speed and distance it's no wonder that I'm so tired all of the time.
@HappyHonee
@HappyHonee 2 роки тому
This was awesome! Right amount of humor, slides, info, poking fun at each other. Loved it!!
@icykickflip
@icykickflip 4 роки тому
“Could your fish brain handle that” No I’d probably eat a pencil and walk into a jet turbine and die
@alexturner1945
@alexturner1945 2 роки тому
Lol.. tell the truth bro
@DogsaladSalad
@DogsaladSalad 2 роки тому
LOL! That's SO random! Hahaha
@BoldenFMA
@BoldenFMA 2 роки тому
I needed a laugh. Thank You 🙏🏽
@Georgia-Vic
@Georgia-Vic 2 роки тому
Right but not before you jammed a watch battery up my nose to correct my myopic vision that was waaay to late arriving into the unfurling course of ambient arrival from the ancient aliens and their pet Pleseosaurus in my 12 foot swimming pool!
@philipgebhardt3453
@philipgebhardt3453 5 років тому
I love this video. What I love about the scientists (particularly Andre Linde) is the humour and humility with which they discuss their theories. A must-see video for anyone who is interested in cosmology.
@razzsmith1580
@razzsmith1580 4 роки тому
Philip Gebhardt I thought cosmology was like make up n shit 😂😂😂
@TheOriginalDuckley
@TheOriginalDuckley 4 роки тому
Razz Smith you’re thinking of cosmetology
@youtubesecurity7992
@youtubesecurity7992 3 роки тому
@@razzsmith1580 You probably confused it with "Cosmopolitan" (the magazine).
@IjsBlice
@IjsBlice 3 роки тому
On a similiar WSF Andrei was like ..... 'I conceived this idea while in the loo' .....lol
@welingkartr416
@welingkartr416 2 роки тому
I got a feeling the moderator -otherwise a wonderful person- was trying to rush him politely. Andre Linde is not a native English speaker and on top of that he probably had the most difficult task among them all, for he was trying to explain why his explanation of the multiverse draws from some theories/ ideas/ hypotheses from two vastly different realms - String Theory and of course, Cosmology.
@charlesskelton4058
@charlesskelton4058 3 роки тому
If you don’t ask the question you’ll never find an answer. Carry on my wayward sons, there be peace when you are done....
@Nutbuster1
@Nutbuster1 2 роки тому
If I give you my phone number can I ask you a question? I can’t say much on hear I have a burner and I can get you one to listen we don’t have much time, Me and my team are from 2124 and you play a major role in what is about to happen in the next 2 weeks on your earth
@labortechs5661
@labortechs5661 2 роки тому
Really?
@Georgia-Vic
@Georgia-Vic 2 роки тому
@@Nutbuster1wow I wanna go Back to the Future with you, the people are mean here in your past!
@C0rrier
@C0rrier 2 роки тому
@@Nutbuster1 sure whats your phone number?
@fishslicing
@fishslicing 2 роки тому
That was a good concert.
@Arcticninja123
@Arcticninja123 3 роки тому
i hope everyone knows that this stuff aint easy and they're explaining it in a way anybody can understand. lots of work was put into this knowledge
@tabibuhamadi31
@tabibuhamadi31 6 років тому
The multi verse is so interesting because it might explain metaphysics, spirituality and mythology to curious classical mind.
@mbehchinenge5689
@mbehchinenge5689 4 роки тому
True Brother. Greetings from Cameroon. I think it is a universe that collapse to a universe. U=You your mind is the mind-space the universe collapse into.
@jem5231
@jem5231 4 роки тому
That`s why the multiverse theory, like alternative realities is new age religion, not science. By definition there can only be one Universe and reality. And if others existed, the evidence of it`s effect on ours would be observable. As far as observable evidence goes, The Universe evolves from nothing but the vacuum energy of empty space which is also the future state of The Universe. Hence we are living in an eternal `cyclic` Universe. But science fiction has become the most popular religion in the west because the majority find fiction more entertaining than fact. Same with other supernatural beliefs that caters for the human ego, like the illusion of `free will`.
@donaldbaird7849
@donaldbaird7849 3 роки тому
@@jem5231 I agree with you for the most part but calling it "religion" is a bit disingenuous. It's theoretical physics and should still be taken somewhat seriously (like the rest of theoretical physics) but should also be taken with a HUGE grain of salt as it is not confirmed nor is it scientifically testable at the moment. If the multiverse theory was true, then it would explain why our universe appears to be so fine tuned without necessarily having to invoke the anthropic principle, which is why it should still be taken seriously. Anyone that tells you it is actually real though is either lying to themselves or a fool ofc
@llamamusicchannel7688
@llamamusicchannel7688 3 роки тому
@@jem5231 spot the atheist layman that still believes science has all the answers Science describes many things, there's no theory of everything yet though, so you putting all your faith into our current understanding of how the world works is really no different to a religious person putting all their faith into an ideology. Neither has all the answers. No truth is known, we have observed the universe to the nth degree and yet do not understand what any of it is. We can harness electricity, know how to convert photons into the flow of electricity and back again, yet have no clue what electromagnetism really is. We can describe how things function, yet do not know how anything truly works. So until we have a theory of everything, that thoroughly describes how and why everything exists, putting all your faith on "but muh science" is no different in my eyes. If a creator exists, science would still be valid, you'd be observing the exact same things. All science does is disprove religious tales like those in the Bible stating we were created in God's image. God would have started the universe with a bang, and from there all our current scientific observations would be exactly the same as if we just happened to come into existence. How is a creator any more ludicrous than the big bang? Both dictate something comes from nothing, if there is no creator that doesn't make the universe any less ridiculous than if there is one. Fact is, I exist, I know I exist, I do not know why I exist, claiming to have a definite understanding of why I came to exist would be idiotic.
@brinlogie4598
@brinlogie4598 3 роки тому
Not might, I feel it does.
@turfloor8523
@turfloor8523 8 років тому
our universe could be a sub-atomic partial of a larger reality for all we know.
@irasorkin2212
@irasorkin2212 6 років тому
and more infinitely smaller and more infinitely larger...and on and on.
@leonreynolds77
@leonreynolds77 4 роки тому
Yes, very possible! I believe infinity extends towards smallness and largeness.
@johnradue7365
@johnradue7365 4 роки тому
Michael Reynolds Zcczczc
@leonreynolds77
@leonreynolds77 4 роки тому
What? 🤣
@mikelouis9389
@mikelouis9389 4 роки тому
Stoner Philosophy 101.
@MrVitorBrum
@MrVitorBrum 2 роки тому
Andrei Linde! I LOVE listening to your explanations! ❤️
@DV-tx6ol
@DV-tx6ol 2 роки тому
Interesting theories. We once thought we were the center of the universe. I wouldn't be shocked to find out that our universe isn't the center of reality itself.
@michaelgilbert8003
@michaelgilbert8003 2 роки тому
I have been studying mathematics of the University pretty much come up with itself identity of itself to be that. It all comes back to the beginning point.
@boylean
@boylean 2 роки тому
Well put
@boylean
@boylean 2 роки тому
@@michaelgilbert8003 theoretical mathematics? Doing math resulting in any kind of output when using our current theories on the universes dynamic formations and structures would only result in a THEORETICAL number. And besides that this subject matter has stumbled every mathmatican including Einstein. Please tell me more how university has proved great attraction theory.
@floridanews8786
@floridanews8786 2 роки тому
There is a universe of life living in each one of our bodies. Microscopic living beings of all sorts. When one of us dies, a universe dies with us.
@michaelgilbert8003
@michaelgilbert8003 2 роки тому
To which comment were you replying. I have several very interesting things I have been exploring .
@synisterfish
@synisterfish 3 роки тому
"The Universe", (whichever idea of it we subscribe to), is the nickname we have given to a categorically unknowable mystery. The realisation of this mystery which we call "reality" is entirely dependent on our particular scale, our senses, and our faculty of inquiry... meanwhile, everything we think we know about this consensual, agreed upon, "reality" is entirely constructed from descriptive language. This modern age is a construction of magic words; words of such great magicians as the likes of Sir Isaac Newton and Rene Descartes, wizards who unpacked their ideas into the general reality of everybody and created the foundation of what we considered to be 'true' for a long time... From "God" to "Gravity" or from "Adam" to "The Atom", all of the ideas from the religious or scientific worldviews that we consider to be facts are actually just made out of words: metaphors; literary devices; reductions; approximations; models in the program of our "human condition[ing]".
@lawlaw295
@lawlaw295 3 роки тому
It is very significant when these models are predictive.
@scottcupp8129
@scottcupp8129 2 роки тому
@@lawlaw295 Indeed so.
@goose9631
@goose9631 2 роки тому
One word to sum up that beautiful idea which I agree with entirely is “subjective”. As in just about every thought we have ever had is a nonsensical subjective idea stemming from the absurdness of needing to constantly put a “meaning” on things. Science and philosophy mean the same things if you look at it a certain way. Everything is a subjective perspective of individualism and it has been since the first known “intelligent” role model.
@scottcupp8129
@scottcupp8129 2 роки тому
@@goose9631 Absolutely beautiful and brilliant and deep comment, Goose. All I can say is that I concur wholly with what you said.
@jasonfarley623
@jasonfarley623 2 роки тому
Cocaine is a helluva drug!
@hoodwinkedagain
@hoodwinkedagain 5 років тому
I frequently decide to wait one extra nano-second to breathe, just so I can spawn another universe... makes total sense.
@slevinchannel7589
@slevinchannel7589 3 роки тому
Certainly not just One Universe. It's just more Logical. It just makes more Sense.
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 3 роки тому
Slevin Channel 🐟 05. THE PHENOMENAL UNIVERSE: The fact that the external, phenomenal universe (“prakṛti”, in Sanskrit) of names and forms (“nāmarūpa”, in Sanskrit/Pali) exists solely within personal consciousness (and by extension, Universal Consciousness), is superlatively logical. If this material world actually existed as a separate reality, then obviously, it would have limits, because the nature of matter is that it has a measurable, three-dimensional finitude. Therefore, if one were to travel to the edge of the universe, there would need to be something WITHOUT the boundary of the universe (some other ’’universe’’, which contains this universe). This contradicts the very concept of a universe (literally, “turned into one”). The late, great Professor Dr. Alan Watts’ response to the question: “where is the universe located?”, was: “nowhere and everywhere”. This phenomenal manifestation is composed of space, time, energy, and matter, the latter of which comprises eight elemental groups - the five GROSS elements (“mahābhūta”, in Sanskrit), which are perceivable by at least one of the five senses, and the three SUBTLE elements (“tanmātra” or “atisūkṣma mātra”, in Sanskrit), which are symptomatic of localized consciousness. N. B. Dark matter is not included in this system, as cosmological science has yet to determine its structural composition. The five gross material elements and three subtle material elements are (from most gross to most subtle): SOLIDS (AKA earth - “bhūmiḥ” or “pṛthivī”, in Sanskrit) are made of densely-packed atoms and molecules of a steady shape at room temperature. LIQUIDS (AKA water - “jala” or “āpaḥ”, in Sanskrit) are composed of moderately dense molecules (usually including at least some water) of no fixed shape. GAS (AKA air - “vāyuḥ” or “marut”, in Sanskrit) consists of rarefied atomic particles of no fixed shape. HEAT (AKA fire - “analaḥ” or “tejas”, in Sanskrit) is made of kinetic energy (which may or may not appear visibly as fire, or at least heat waves). ETHER (AKA space - “ākāśa” or “khaṃ”, in Sanskrit) is a vacuum consisting of three-dimensional space (length, breadth, and width). However, recent investigation has confirmed that empty space is actually filled with virtual particles (matter and antimatter). Thus, the explanation for the material universe being created from “nothing” (anti-matter) is plausible, according to quantum field theory. MIND (“manaḥ”, in Sanskrit) is composed of sensual perceptions, instinctual thoughts, abstract images (including memories and fantasies), and emotions. Not all animal species possess a mind, but function purely on base instincts, originating from their genetic code, via a rudimentary nervous system. INTELLECT (“buddhiḥ”, in Sanskrit) consists of conceptual thoughts. Only the very higher species of animal life possess an intellectual capacity. PSEUDO-EGO (“ahaṃkāraḥ”, in Sanskrit) is comprised of the “I” thought (in this case, the illusory, temporal self-identity). Only humans possess the self-awareness necessary to question their own existence. Read Chapter 10 for a full elucidation of egoity. Each of the FIVE gross material elements corresponds to one of the senses of the body. E.g. In outer space, where there is a vacuum (ether), one can detect light with the eyes, yet space is not tactile and cannot be smelled or tasted, nor can sound waves travel via space. At the opposite extreme, solid matter can be seen with the eyes, felt with the sense of touch, tasted with the tongue, smelt with the nose, and heard with the ear (when the solid matter is physically vibrated). Beyond these eight material elements is the TRUE self - which pervades the entire body, and indeed, which is the Universal Self (“ayam ātmā brahma”, in Sanskrit). That explains why we say: “This is my body” or “I possess a mind”. Who is the owner of the body and the mind? It is us, the anti-matter, the inextinguishable authentic self/Self (“ātmana/Paramātmana”, in Sanskrit). Ultimately speaking, the Universal Self alone is. HOWEVER, all eight elements are in fact “made” of Consciousness, since, as demonstrated previously, naught but Consciousness exists. Consciousness is the ultimate reality (“prajñānam brahma”, in Sanskrit). Just as a wedding ring depends on gold for its very existence, so too does the phenomenal universe depend entirely on ”Beingness” or “Isness”, Consciousness, and Blissful Awareness. Although The Absolute cannot be verbally-described, (otherwise, it would be an OBJECT), as a concession to materialists, Infinite Consciousness has said to exhibit three innate attributes, known as “sacchidānanda”, a compounded Sanskrit epithet, consisting of the three words “sat”, “cit” and “ānanda” - Eternal Being(ness), Existence, or Truth; Conscious Knowledge; and Perfect Peace (often translated as “bliss”. However, the term “bliss” connotes an ephemeral experience of euphoria, whereas “peace” is the absence of any form of temporal suffering). Because Absolutely Nothing (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit) is Infinite Creative Potentiality, it actualizes as Absolutely Everything. Attributeless Consciousness at Rest (in Sanskrit, “Nirguna Brahman”) manifests as this phenomenal universe (Consciousness in Action, or in Sanskrit, “Saguna Brahman”). In the verbiage of quantum physics, the enfolded implicate order ‘becomes’ the unfolded explicate order. In REALITY there is no separation of anything at any time (assuming that Consciousness is a “thing”, and that time is an attribute of The Uncaused Absolute). That the total sum energy of the universe is zero, implies the non-existence of matter (i. e. no thing exists objectively). The phenomenal manifestation is eternally cyclical, because ‘coming into existence’ implies ‘going out of existence’, just as ‘black’ implies the existence of ‘white’, or as ‘rich’ implies ‘poor’. Is it possible to have something without nothing? Obviously not, because the two go together, as interrelated opposites. Similarly, despite what most believe, the outer-world is as much the Self as the inner-world. Where is the boundary of the human body? When we look at a person, we cannot see that person UNLESS we also see the background image. The two are inseparable, just as a flower and a bee cannot exist without the other. This fact alone is ample evidence that the universe is a holistic and wholistic system or entity. You who are reading these words are that Totality of Existence, the Highest Universal Principle, the Essential Irreducible Self. In common parlance, you are God (IF you only knew it!). Most of the greatest sages in history have spoken about either or both these concepts (of the Absolute Truth being either Absolutely Everything or Absolute Nothingness), such as the concept of “nirvana” in Buddhism, or in Avatar Meher Baba's book “The Everything and the Nothing” (which is highly-recommended, particularly Chapters 51 to 56, which poetically describe the Ineffable One-without-a-second). Even an ordinary writer, American author Kurt Vonnegut, once penned: “Everything is nothing - with a twist”. The Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics professor, Doctor Leonard Susskind's so-called “minus-first law of physics” states that information is INDESTRUCTIBLE. This is akin to the law of conservation of energy in classical physics, and proves that neither physical or psychic energy is lost. Read subsequent chapters to learn more about how this law relates to the notion of reincarnation, as well as to miraculous phenomena such as savant syndrome. The planet on which we are residing consists of animate/organic life, as well as inanimate/inorganic matter. The six stages of ORGANIC life are: 1. conception/birth 2. growth/development 3. maintenance 4. reproduction 5. ageing/deterioration 6. death British polymath Thomas Young's famous double-slit experiment suggests that matter exists purely as potentiality or as a "possibility" until it is observed by a conscious being. This phenomenon, known as the wave-particle duality, is often discussed in advanced spiritual discourses, as it gives credence to the primacy of Consciousness. There are other aspects of the universe (e.g. the various philosophical approaches to the nature of ontological time, the accelerated expanding universe, holographic universe principle, quantum superposition, wave function, and quantum entanglement), as well as the possibility of life on other planets, the crop circle phenomenon, and the presence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature, which are beyond the scope of this document, and which do not directly relate to the most important thing in life (to find the unending peace/happiness which we humans are ULTIMATELY seeking). “Find out who you REALLY are so that when death comes…there is no-one to kill, for while you are identified with your role, with your name, with your ego, there is someone to kill. But when you are identified with the whole universe, death finds you already annihilated and there’s no-one to kill”. ************* “Just as you depend on the universe, so too does the universe depend on YOU. Everything depends on everything else.” Professor Alan W. Watts, British-American Philosopher. “Who is the perceiver? Universal Consciousness alone is the perceiver. The body is merely the mechanism, through which perceiving takes place and from which the ego is inferred, as the perceiver of other objects. Strictly speaking, there is neither the perceiver nor the perceived. There is only perceiving, as the objective expression of the subjective functioning, of the one Universal Consciousness.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher.
@GinoNL
@GinoNL 2 роки тому
😂
@GinoNL
@GinoNL 2 роки тому
@@TheWorldTeacher Measurable three-dimensional? Isn’t it four?
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 2 роки тому
@@GinoNL, no. 🤔
@kenwhitfield219
@kenwhitfield219 2 роки тому
I think what i’m hearing in this discussion is the possibility that the origin of THE Big Bang is from another of multiple universes. Our universe was not the first of many universes. There was at least one universe already, that gave birth to the big bang that created our universe.
@gelato007
@gelato007 2 роки тому
I think the Big Bang happened once and i think it caused 2 other universes at the same time and everything that is happening in our universe is happening in the other universes at the same time as well so basically it’s like 3 balloons tided together and all of the universes are expanding by the second
@missepicmandy
@missepicmandy 3 місяці тому
Our universe was created from Big Bang. Then, after some unknown time after expansion, it will change back to its current state. And as that happens a new universe will be born instantly. So basically our universe renews itself every 49 billion years.
@chewyjello1
@chewyjello1 2 роки тому
Andre Linde is hillarious. Could listen to him for hours!
@thecentralscrutinizerr
@thecentralscrutinizerr 4 роки тому
Andre Linde has to be the most lovable cosmologist in existence.
@leonreynolds77
@leonreynolds77 4 роки тому
He is awesome.
@pheonix72
@pheonix72 3 роки тому
This existence, yes.
@MrMegaSuperBoy
@MrMegaSuperBoy 2 роки тому
was searching for that comment the guy is gold
@ozdorothyfan
@ozdorothyfan 3 роки тому
Stuff like this really rips my knitting. I remember as a child discovering that if I faced two mirrors at each other I could then see reflection upon reflection upon reflection seemingly forever. And began thinking what if I could shrink myself down smaller and smaller as needed and follow the reflections further and further into the mirror. How small could it get? Imagine what that does to a 5 or 6 year old mind. I mentioned the thought to a schoolteacher who I think considered it sort of weird that one so young was pondering this while all the others were more interested in playing with crayons. But the teacher did mention atoms and even smaller particles which simply messed me up further. I discovered that atoms were orbited by particles even smaller than they were and began to think but isn't that exactly what the solar system looks like? Sun as an atom with planets etc. as electrons orbiting it and so on? My 5 year old mind then thought does this mean that the sun and all solar system objects could be merely particles in some mind bogglingly large solid body? and that's even before later beginning to incorporate galaxies into the whole speculation. Thoughts like that have been torturing me ever since and then the likes of these guys come along with all this multiverse stuff. All I want to think about that is please just shut up already. I'm still back here in my mirrors.
@jimtheakston9732
@jimtheakston9732 2 роки тому
Very good your the only one so far that caught it great mind don't let anyone. Change the way you think the others are. Not on you frequency ???
@nimbette2
@nimbette2 2 роки тому
You are not the only one that has thought all that. We are all destined to be plagued by these unanswerable questions
@chunglee6895
@chunglee6895 3 роки тому
Bravo, Andre. You give me the simplest explanation on the existence of multiverse.
@jericleopoldo4129
@jericleopoldo4129 2 роки тому
time stamp?
@ethanbowen224
@ethanbowen224 3 роки тому
Knowing that eventually our universe will probably eventually die out and all matter will cease to exist, the idea of a multiverse is more comforting and optimistic since it would mean that there will always be cosmic activity and potential life out there.
@nimbette2
@nimbette2 2 роки тому
Hopefully we will find ways to move our population to other empty copies of Earth like planets via the wormholes we find that lead into other universes … but who knows
@hinduactivist5527
@hinduactivist5527 7 років тому
One day one farmer build a well in his farm, and by time he left the farm and migrated in a city. The abandoned well got some frogs by time. One day they had a meeting about what is outside this well. One frog said, our well was created by a bang and its hundreds other wells outside our well. Other said, nope, just one well is there. No one imagined anything but wells.
@jahkrmusic
@jahkrmusic 7 років тому
This was brilliant!
@keithbaker9160
@keithbaker9160 4 роки тому
Cave theory!
@akkalat85
@akkalat85 9 років тому
Andre Linde is hilarious.
@salu30000
@salu30000 3 роки тому
Everybody gangsta untill the real one walks in
@beamerUSA
@beamerUSA 3 роки тому
no kiddin, I love him
@slevinchannel7589
@slevinchannel7589 3 роки тому
Certainly not just One Universe. It's just more Logical. It just makes more Sense.
@themonsterbaby
@themonsterbaby 2 роки тому
@@slevinchannel7589 Jesus christ, have you commented that on every comment? 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ you know that's fucking weird right?
@cliffordchase319
@cliffordchase319 2 роки тому
Love how we get to share some insights of so many geniuses. What a privilege ,wow !
@davidsault9698
@davidsault9698 3 роки тому
The more we know, the less it matters that we know. Multiverses? Great. I'm off to the store to get some TP.
@scottcupp8129
@scottcupp8129 2 роки тому
And there is one universe we know so little about. In fact we know more about the Universe than we know of the 3 pound wrinkly meatball between our ears. The brain is TRULY mysterious!
@asmrbully6980
@asmrbully6980 2 роки тому
whats tp
@davidsault9698
@davidsault9698 2 роки тому
@@asmrbully6980 Toilet paper.
@kansaspool8243
@kansaspool8243 2 роки тому
Mood
@jameseqqq9028
@jameseqqq9028 9 років тому
well, that got a little tasty :) (brit speak for a little bit of friction, tension eg at 59min), when the panel started discussing universe versus multiverse theories the disagreement was very interesting, engaging, and informative to listen to. and i enjoyed the different perspectives on the theories i hope they compose more panels in the same vein
@erichodge567
@erichodge567 3 роки тому
Well, somebody's going to get a Nobel prize, and somebody else is not.
@peterkovacs8876
@peterkovacs8876 4 роки тому
LINDE IS FANTASTIC, great humor, Neil please more respect, he is BIG scientist, and you a common teacher ! please
@IjsBlice
@IjsBlice 3 роки тому
I agree.....because they are discounting his hypothesis but yet cannot prove that it is absolutely invalid. To say to persue the research because its not predictive is so unlike the nature of a scientist
@StaticBlaster
@StaticBlaster 3 роки тому
The Turok cyclic model is bizarre because it's essentially an extremely watered down version of the multiverse. He's describing a landscape of two braneworlds colliding and expands for about a trillion years and recollapses into a big crunch which initiates another big bang, ad infinitum. Personally, I'm a huge fan of the multiverse theory.
@Disgruntled_Old_Man
@Disgruntled_Old_Man 3 роки тому
Neal Turoch (No clue if I'm spelling that correctly) is speaking about theory that is still controversial and stating it like it's fact. Dark Energy and Dark Matter are barely considered theories and are still highly contested. While a particle called the Higs bozon was in fact discovered it is still unclear as to whether or not the field generated by this particle is responsible for the formation of matter or anything at all. The way the speaker is describing space is incredibly destructive and can lead to huge misconceptions that will add a bias to future discoveries and researchers down the road need to ensure they're not tainted by a bias when trying to unravel mysteries. If it's not 100% observable than at most it's a theory. In some cases it's fairly obvious that the theories are almost certainly accurate such as the theory of evolution, which despite what creationists claim, has been reproduced in a lab. On the subject of Dark Matter / Dark Energy and the Higs Field those are still highly contested theories without enough evidence to be accepted as mainstream thought. Dark Energy and Dark matter really look like a lazy idea to describe observations being made in the universe around us. When I personally look at the theory it's almost as bad as saying "Magic" is responsible. We have yet to find a single particle of dark matter and experiments in the deepest parts of our planet have been going on for years in an attempt to find this matter. As for dark energy it's so incredibly vague. All we know is the universe is expanding faster so someone came up with the hypothesis of dark energy as a way to get people looking for the source of the energy that is causing this phenomena but instead of people trying to find the source they simply began running around calling the non-observed energy Dark Energy. As for Dark Matter this theory came about becuase of our current understanding of gravity. Models of galaxies on computer simulations would begin flinging themselves apart into space. The only way to get the models to work the same way we see galaxies working in real life was to add a fuck ton of more matter to it than we actually observe within the galaxies due to our current formula for gravity. This is what stopped the galaxies in the computer modeling to stop flinging themselves apart. That is too easily argued away by simply saying our understanding of gravity isn't accurate which is a statement that's known to be true. If you're a researcher you absolutely have to be clear when speaking that these are not absolutes and this guest speaker is doing the exact opposite. If people's picture of reality is incorrect that makes them insane. To give the impression that these are absolutes can cause others to have an inaccurate picture of reality. That's the purpose of propaganda, not science.
@cybercheese3
@cybercheese3 3 роки тому
Do you think there's a universe where they have the technology/ability to talk to/travel to other universes? 🤔
@64TommyG
@64TommyG 2 роки тому
I think so because if multiversum exist everything that is conceivable can exist and in combination with time curvature at black holes and as yet unknown dimension portals are conceivable, the question is why that possibility would not exist?
@Teddokrato
@Teddokrato Рік тому
I do That explains UFOs They are from another universe they come here out of curiosity Analogy A primitive tribe visited by anthropogists in helicopter
@adamhurst4219
@adamhurst4219 5 років тому
What I found most intriguing was the idea that man's gathering and understanding of information/knowledge shall always be finite therefore seeking an understanding of the infinite will always be unobtainable so until absolutely proven wrong we should seek finite conclusions to even the most complex problems. And the very brief mention of universal horizons that can give an illusion of a multiverse due to our perception within the horizon.
@TheKoelnKalk
@TheKoelnKalk 8 років тому
just realized I was born in the wrong universe
@michaelgablecolvin7949
@michaelgablecolvin7949 5 років тому
Markus Bopp so was I ;)
@KhalilAttiba
@KhalilAttiba 5 років тому
The real you is a billionaire
@helpmefortheloveofshrek6623
@helpmefortheloveofshrek6623 5 років тому
Same
@mysticoversoul
@mysticoversoul 4 роки тому
😂
@darugdawg2453
@darugdawg2453 4 роки тому
The real you is the you right now. Those persons who are like you is not you. If you clone yourself he will be another person. Free will and reasoning is a separate entity
@winningblack5112
@winningblack5112 3 роки тому
What if it’s just one huge universe with multiple branches that is continuously growing and developing over time. So you have the Mother Universe and then the little children universes branching out into the dark energized empty space. What some think is multi universes would actually be correct. These universes grow to form different things and doesn’t have to mirror one another.
@gelato007
@gelato007 2 роки тому
what i think is that the universe is spilt into 3 parts and the same thing in our universe is happening in the other universes and each of the universes can never end because they all expanded if that makes sense
@jonabarr
@jonabarr 10 місяців тому
That is a very interesting theory! What I love about these debates is that beautiful minds honed in to a specific theory and thus extensively studied and explored their thoughts! I for one love the enamored yearning for answers that all of these people live by. One theory I have is that time is only relevant to our tangible reality. So it's extremely difficult to understand higher dimensions or paradigms with our limited capacity bounded by time. And also I think it also applies to our science and biological boundaries. Would love to hear your thoughts on this. If that's okay. 😊
@DiceDecides
@DiceDecides Рік тому
35:28 so did we basically discover the map of the universe? since all the red (dense) parts just expanded away from each other but maintaining the same ratio. I wonder where we are on the map.
@ratedAD
@ratedAD 4 роки тому
Can we all agree that the moderator (for a non scientist) did a fabtastic job? It's got to be a very hard gig to be funny and engaging and fair and thoughtful.
@maleficarus
@maleficarus 4 роки тому
I was thinking the same thing, but there had to be because if there was no referee so to speak it would have turned into a much different debate....
@airdenmark
@airdenmark Рік тому
Can we all agree, that saying "Can we all agree" is one of the most stupidest comments ever.
@maefuentes2939
@maefuentes2939 4 роки тому
""the universe is a gigantic big nothing" Lays Chips is a model universe...
@stevenmorris1153
@stevenmorris1153 3 роки тому
Is it because the bag is half empty or because it's not a good source or nutrients? I don't get it
@jimtheakston9732
@jimtheakston9732 2 роки тому
YOU CAN'T EAT JUST ONE ???
@eosapienrancher4045
@eosapienrancher4045 2 роки тому
"Could your fish brain handle that?" You know, I get asked that question a lot
@ramaraksha01
@ramaraksha01 2 роки тому
The question was answered right at the beginning with the example of evolution - we don't know how life started but once it did, life has exploded into the various forms we see today
@futurebuddhabooks
@futurebuddhabooks 4 роки тому
No Ads! Amazing!!!
@vmorris5
@vmorris5 8 років тому
I give you a quote from Sir Arthur Eddington:(close, anyway) "The Universe is not only stranger than you imagine it to be, it is stranger than you CAN imagine it to be." The effort of most scientists is to develop an understanding of the operating principles of the Universe such that humans can use that understanding to control the Universe insofar as that will be possible. Without an understanding of and control of the operations of the Universe we have to live with beliefs rather than being able to affect the Universe.
@briancarney3443
@briancarney3443 2 роки тому
... exactamundo 👍
@chuckyspearsmusicpage2329
@chuckyspearsmusicpage2329 2 роки тому
Amazing video.. I never thought scientists can be so entertaining and informative.. Keep up the Good work 👏🏾
@badreeddibe3868
@badreeddibe3868 3 роки тому
the intro is just wow, i like the comics effecs book, thnks a lot
@canadianfox3099
@canadianfox3099 5 років тому
The real question is how the Hell do we get all of them to smoke DMT
@keithkoster8937
@keithkoster8937 4 роки тому
Lol, that is funny. It's probably that they use more DMT than us, that's produced in small amounts in your brain
@ryanlyle9201
@ryanlyle9201 4 роки тому
Keith Koster lmao they harvest pineal glands from babies to obtain adrenochrome. Way crazier than DMT, and keeps celebrities looking young. 😂
@razzsmith1580
@razzsmith1580 4 роки тому
Fuck DMT It killed 2 of my friends.
@kevinjarrett6841
@kevinjarrett6841 4 роки тому
Razz Smith how?
@larrywoofter7571
@larrywoofter7571 3 роки тому
@@razzsmith1580 pure DMT? MAOI? How did this happen?
@moniqueburchell1488
@moniqueburchell1488 9 років тому
This was a fascinating debate and I especially appreciated the competence and humour of the moderator.
@jonesgerard
@jonesgerard 9 років тому
It was a debate? I think they're all the same, materialists. Mention quantum mind , then you'd see a debate. Thats why so many scientists are coming out against where the money is being wasted on the human brain project. The idiots running it are of the opinion that if you can't see it under a microscope it can't be mind. Its just the same artificial intelligence crowd with a bunch of cash to blow.
@mscir
@mscir 3 роки тому
GREAT video, informative, funny, very well moderated, thank you and my compliments.
@davidmcgowan5008
@davidmcgowan5008 3 роки тому
Jesus christ
@ameremortal
@ameremortal 3 роки тому
This was amazing. Thanks to everyone involved.
@impuredeath2
@impuredeath2 9 років тому
There are 12 universe... according to dragon ball z.
@weed5129
@weed5129 6 років тому
xd
@kzakaria91
@kzakaria91 6 років тому
ecks dee
@nagahumanbeingzooofparticl8836
@nagahumanbeingzooofparticl8836 6 років тому
impuredeath2 not the kind of scientist we would like to have in the future...
@5tonyvvvv
@5tonyvvvv 5 років тому
Why Aren't Atheists skeptical of all these unseen inaccessible universes??
@dougiequick1
@dougiequick1 5 років тому
Ballz said the queen, If I had 2, then I'd be king....and it would all be exactly different just like it was right now, tomorrow....WAKE UP! Admit you are asleep and only dreaming you were awake upon dozing....But seriously, all these theories, all this talk is like mental masturbation but you never climax....The only ones that profit are those that get PAID for jerking off in front of everyone ....they have to be embarrassed much like someone who's job is dressing up in a gorilla costume hopping around in the sun, sweating and holding some stupid sign hawking some failing business in some sleazy strip mall...but at least the smuck in the costume has anonymity.... unlike these posers.....AGGGHHHH!!!
@KristyandMarcus
@KristyandMarcus 3 роки тому
If the fish found out there was more than just their pond, they'd not think anything about it & then forget about it altogether 3 seconds later..
@sirvapalot
@sirvapalot 2 роки тому
Loved this conversation, the Russian physicist Andre is funny and informative.thanks to all the scientists that communicate these big topics freely to all who are interested.
@stevendyer6868
@stevendyer6868 2 роки тому
@9:36 How would it be known that it was a out a millimeter across in length? I'm not sure how most of the theory is explainable but this one detail is very specific and I'm curious how it was decided
@kathyann8974
@kathyann8974 2 роки тому
That’s what I was thinking too. Since no one (as far as we know) was there how do they know it was one millimeter in length? I believe they think one millimeter because of the math that supports the inflation theory, if I understood correctly.
@MacM545
@MacM545 5 років тому
Great channel! I think that each universe is connected; I mean, I think that multiverse might be real, but not that every alternative exists, since everything that happens in one of the universes has to have an effect on all others, albeit the effect might be infinitesimally small. We can notice such phenomenon in our own world, and there's no example that I know of where the opposite's true. Most notably planets and stars, might to some extent seem like separate entities but gravity reaches across the entire universe, and there's no reason to think that the forces of our own universe don't effect others. And if the forces effect other universes, then the multiverse is a single universe, since the forces of our own can reach out to all other universes.
@jimtheakston9732
@jimtheakston9732 2 роки тому
Very good also for every action there is a reaction ???
@briancarney3443
@briancarney3443 2 роки тому
A containment theory has not even been at the very least... ...proposed yet. ...just saying...
@MacM545
@MacM545 2 роки тому
@@briancarney3443 Maybe, but that's what's confusing about it
@WhoRaq
@WhoRaq 3 роки тому
Neil is one of my favorite men in this lifetime. All these men are truly amazing.
@GinoNL
@GinoNL 2 роки тому
For me he was #4 in terms of matching thoughts and ideologies
@geronimomadrid7733
@geronimomadrid7733 2 роки тому
He seemed a douche
@bobtheblindbedroomguitaris8742
@bobtheblindbedroomguitaris8742 3 роки тому
I've been listening to I've been listening to a lot of these physics lectures or whatever you want to call them conferences for the public and every time I hear Andre with that accent he's so freaking funny and so intelligent it's crazy and it's cool and I love this guy. He's mind is as infinite as his theories are or his beliefs and theories I should say LOL yep he's just an amazing guy with the sense of humor that is a sharp as a knife period every time I hear one of these conferences and he's in it I know it's going to be a fun one anyway the multi-world world the multi-universe theory I would love to believe it I don't know what to believe I've heard the pros and cons on both sides from different videos and lectures and conferences. And you know when I hear someone like Andre on the pro side of the multiverse Siri you know I have so much respect for this man and his intelligence that you know maybe I got to start thinking that you know there's a me in the next universe over that can see and wouldn't that be wonderful anyway this is one long sentence I'm sure the text to speech which I use due to my blindness has its own unique take on the English language so forgive me those errors actually they're not my errors they're the phones and the speech to text apps errors nonetheless I apologize I hope what I'm saying there's a lot of times when I'm trying to say and comes out as gibberish sometimes it comes out completely different and it's a whole another story LOL but that's about it so everyone stay safe put on your masks sincere yours, Bob the blind bedroom guitarist Bob the blind bedroom guitarist
@beamerUSA
@beamerUSA 3 роки тому
I love all these Guys and the moderator and and this particular episode. ( I think I have seen this episode like 7 times just like Charles Bronson's: The Mechanic and I m not getting tired of it just like the The Mech.)
@thinkingabouttomorrow1318
@thinkingabouttomorrow1318 4 роки тому
In a multiverse, the 2 clapping universes would be happening. Both could be right.
@chrisbrown8640
@chrisbrown8640 2 роки тому
The Multiverse is possible...many folk today are living in alternate universes.....
@Pinkielover
@Pinkielover 4 роки тому
everything is endless, whatever u think of is real. pretty simple really and beautiful to think of
@blacksheeppaintball0495
@blacksheeppaintball0495 4 роки тому
That's not exactly true....
@Uprise641
@Uprise641 3 роки тому
tell that to my eternal suffering
@markclancy5714
@markclancy5714 3 роки тому
I love a lyric by DTP that quotes "realizing the multiverse is just one thing"
@gordonconlogue5686
@gordonconlogue5686 3 роки тому
Is there a supreme universe? What started the very first universe or multi verse? We probably will never know
@nimbette2
@nimbette2 2 роки тому
That is what I want to know… the very very beginning before the beginning
@4dityanarayan
@4dityanarayan 8 років тому
The Alan Guth moment has touched hearts :")
@ddavidmac6009
@ddavidmac6009 4 роки тому
Out Standing. I really left my depression behind after seeing this vid.
@indivestor
@indivestor 3 роки тому
Shut up
@minimushrom
@minimushrom 3 роки тому
@@indivestor no you
@fiaonapachuau6478
@fiaonapachuau6478 3 роки тому
Same my anxiety stop after that first joke about maybe next year
@carlosfernandes8169
@carlosfernandes8169 3 роки тому
Está é uma maravilhosa discussão a cinco pessoas, sobre um assunto deslumbrante. Adorei assistir mesmo que tenha sido aqui pelo UKposts. This is a wonderful discussion for five people on a stunning subject. I loved watching it even if it was here on UKposts.
@DG8.
@DG8. 2 роки тому
Да, это было здорово. Yes, This was great.
@4nrrn494
@4nrrn494 3 роки тому
Interesting. That is something that I have told the masses many years ago and even recently. And more interesting is, it was before observing anyone else's theory.
@carsonscott260
@carsonscott260 8 років тому
anyone else keep clicking these videos thinking they're documentaries?
@7e1a
@7e1a 5 років тому
Did you listen to the talk? Information provided is much deeper than in documentaries.
@lyjaugs
@lyjaugs 5 років тому
I still dig it tho , I got bored watching all those documentaries .
@solefood7477
@solefood7477 4 роки тому
This turns out to be much better and resourceful
@robertdoyle6387
@robertdoyle6387 9 років тому
I can hardly add 2+2 and come up w/ 4. But these presentions interest me sooo much. In thinking about multi-universes I think about snowflakes. No two are the same, however together they are all the same...snow!
@jackcurtin9438
@jackcurtin9438 5 років тому
Actually, a FANTASTIC analogy! Bravo ROBERT DOYLE.
@unnamedchannel1237
@unnamedchannel1237 4 роки тому
Just carry a cell phone with you . Most of them have a calculator.
@lucienberl
@lucienberl 4 роки тому
Snowflakes are nazis so dont think about them.
@jmtv1963
@jmtv1963 3 роки тому
Who has looked under a microscope at all the snowflakes that have fallen since the beginning of time to be able to make that statement with surety?
@muzictherpy
@muzictherpy 3 роки тому
This was very poetic :)
@jaykonneker1970
@jaykonneker1970 3 роки тому
Dr. Alan Guth said, once they accounted for the addition of "dark energy" it made the prediction for inflation spot on within about a half of a percent. I'm just confused about the whole "dark energy" part. I thought it was called "dark energy" because we cannot explain it and don't understand why "it" occurs. If anyone could help make sense of his comment it would be appreciated. Love this kick ass panel though! They're all legends
@AR-io8fv
@AR-io8fv 2 роки тому
We don’t know why it occurs but we can measure it.
@speedlimit3d656
@speedlimit3d656 3 роки тому
This is an amazing subject ! I am preparing my theory for this which will be based on factual evidence
@DaveBleyl
@DaveBleyl 4 роки тому
What caused the Universe to expand in one direction similar to a cone and not in all directions? Shouldn’t the singularity or Big Bang be in the center of a sphere?
@moamoa3303
@moamoa3303 4 роки тому
love Neil Turok ,he is such a honnest scientist and one of the greatest minds and i love the way he crush all the arrogant scientist who are 100 % sure their theory about inflation and multiverse is right..like Alan Guth, and Andrei Linde
@juliansmith8778
@juliansmith8778 2 роки тому
But the multiverse is real. It’s the most correct, logical, and reasonable about the scientific data.
@andreafarkas-arvai837
@andreafarkas-arvai837 2 роки тому
he thinks 2 UNIversES colliding is not multiverse....... ???
@treatb09
@treatb09 3 роки тому
in my gravitational field model. it leads to an odd possibility, that there are gravitational flux points that could result in slurred reality. not multiple universes, but polar moments of displaced wave function, that could displace entropy to a multi state of existence overlaying one another. imagine it like having multiple negatives of a single picture, with each having a different possibility of that photo, from fractions of that moment, the entropic outcomes, all then account into this. as we make choices, we take one or more of those slides out, but say another person chooses opposite to you. you stack these negatives, and then print the picture. all these negatives accumulate into one image, where the picture would from it to the other potential outcome, outline a true moment of time. so you can sit on a troff or crest of a gravitational field frequency, and exist in a completely seperate stack of these negatives of photos that make up your own reality. so one polar moment of entropy, could cause you to exist in a completely seperate hologram like outcome, than to another's. think of it like a mirage. you don't really know what is on the other side of that refraction of light. well this is like a refraction of gravity that displaces time between those potential moments, though they exist in the same space and time, they have a seperate probability to equal that exact truth of the moment itself. sounds insane, but it could derive good and bad choices, to create a perception of hell vs heaven on earth. where people outputting these more positive gravitational troff choices or negative crest choices, fabricate their own realities.
@brianmartin6808
@brianmartin6808 2 роки тому
What?
@noneofur300
@noneofur300 2 роки тому
I can only imagine what the big picture that surrounds our universe looks like.
@vishnu2avv
@vishnu2avv 5 років тому
In all speeches, When ever Andrea starts speaking, he will say is on flight or airport.
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 3 роки тому
Slevin Channel 🐟 05. THE PHENOMENAL UNIVERSE: The fact that the external, phenomenal universe (“prakṛti”, in Sanskrit) of names and forms (“nāmarūpa”, in Sanskrit/Pali) exists solely within personal consciousness (and by extension, Universal Consciousness), is superlatively logical. If this material world actually existed as a separate reality, then obviously, it would have limits, because the nature of matter is that it has a measurable, three-dimensional finitude. Therefore, if one were to travel to the edge of the universe, there would need to be something WITHOUT the boundary of the universe (some other ’’universe’’, which contains this universe). This contradicts the very concept of a universe (literally, “turned into one”). The late, great Professor Dr. Alan Watts’ response to the question: “where is the universe located?”, was: “nowhere and everywhere”. This phenomenal manifestation is composed of space, time, energy, and matter, the latter of which comprises eight elemental groups - the five GROSS elements (“mahābhūta”, in Sanskrit), which are perceivable by at least one of the five senses, and the three SUBTLE elements (“tanmātra” or “atisūkṣma mātra”, in Sanskrit), which are symptomatic of localized consciousness. N. B. Dark matter is not included in this system, as cosmological science has yet to determine its structural composition. The five gross material elements and three subtle material elements are (from most gross to most subtle): SOLIDS (AKA earth - “bhūmiḥ” or “pṛthivī”, in Sanskrit) are made of densely-packed atoms and molecules of a steady shape at room temperature. LIQUIDS (AKA water - “jala” or “āpaḥ”, in Sanskrit) are composed of moderately dense molecules (usually including at least some water) of no fixed shape. GAS (AKA air - “vāyuḥ” or “marut”, in Sanskrit) consists of rarefied atomic particles of no fixed shape. HEAT (AKA fire - “analaḥ” or “tejas”, in Sanskrit) is made of kinetic energy (which may or may not appear visibly as fire, or at least heat waves). ETHER (AKA space - “ākāśa” or “khaṃ”, in Sanskrit) is a vacuum consisting of three-dimensional space (length, breadth, and width). However, recent investigation has confirmed that empty space is actually filled with virtual particles (matter and antimatter). Thus, the explanation for the material universe being created from “nothing” (anti-matter) is plausible, according to quantum field theory. MIND (“manaḥ”, in Sanskrit) is composed of sensual perceptions, instinctual thoughts, abstract images (including memories and fantasies), and emotions. Not all animal species possess a mind, but function purely on base instincts, originating from their genetic code, via a rudimentary nervous system. INTELLECT (“buddhiḥ”, in Sanskrit) consists of conceptual thoughts. Only the very higher species of animal life possess an intellectual capacity. PSEUDO-EGO (“ahaṃkāraḥ”, in Sanskrit) is comprised of the “I” thought (in this case, the illusory, temporal self-identity). Only humans possess the self-awareness necessary to question their own existence. Read Chapter 10 for a full elucidation of egoity. Each of the FIVE gross material elements corresponds to one of the senses of the body. E.g. In outer space, where there is a vacuum (ether), one can detect light with the eyes, yet space is not tactile and cannot be smelled or tasted, nor can sound waves travel via space. At the opposite extreme, solid matter can be seen with the eyes, felt with the sense of touch, tasted with the tongue, smelt with the nose, and heard with the ear (when the solid matter is physically vibrated). Beyond these eight material elements is the TRUE self - which pervades the entire body, and indeed, which is the Universal Self (“ayam ātmā brahma”, in Sanskrit). That explains why we say: “This is my body” or “I possess a mind”. Who is the owner of the body and the mind? It is us, the anti-matter, the inextinguishable authentic self/Self (“ātmana/Paramātmana”, in Sanskrit). Ultimately speaking, the Universal Self alone is. HOWEVER, all eight elements are in fact “made” of Consciousness, since, as demonstrated previously, naught but Consciousness exists. Consciousness is the ultimate reality (“prajñānam brahma”, in Sanskrit). Just as a wedding ring depends on gold for its very existence, so too does the phenomenal universe depend entirely on ”Beingness” or “Isness”, Consciousness, and Blissful Awareness. Although The Absolute cannot be verbally-described, (otherwise, it would be an OBJECT), as a concession to materialists, Infinite Consciousness has said to exhibit three innate attributes, known as “sacchidānanda”, a compounded Sanskrit epithet, consisting of the three words “sat”, “cit” and “ānanda” - Eternal Being(ness), Existence, or Truth; Conscious Knowledge; and Perfect Peace (often translated as “bliss”. However, the term “bliss” connotes an ephemeral experience of euphoria, whereas “peace” is the absence of any form of temporal suffering). Because Absolutely Nothing (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit) is Infinite Creative Potentiality, it actualizes as Absolutely Everything. Attributeless Consciousness at Rest (in Sanskrit, “Nirguna Brahman”) manifests as this phenomenal universe (Consciousness in Action, or in Sanskrit, “Saguna Brahman”). In the verbiage of quantum physics, the enfolded implicate order ‘becomes’ the unfolded explicate order. In REALITY there is no separation of anything at any time (assuming that Consciousness is a “thing”, and that time is an attribute of The Uncaused Absolute). That the total sum energy of the universe is zero, implies the non-existence of matter (i. e. no thing exists objectively). The phenomenal manifestation is eternally cyclical, because ‘coming into existence’ implies ‘going out of existence’, just as ‘black’ implies the existence of ‘white’, or as ‘rich’ implies ‘poor’. Is it possible to have something without nothing? Obviously not, because the two go together, as interrelated opposites. Similarly, despite what most believe, the outer-world is as much the Self as the inner-world. Where is the boundary of the human body? When we look at a person, we cannot see that person UNLESS we also see the background image. The two are inseparable, just as a flower and a bee cannot exist without the other. This fact alone is ample evidence that the universe is a holistic and wholistic system or entity. You who are reading these words are that Totality of Existence, the Highest Universal Principle, the Essential Irreducible Self. In common parlance, you are God (IF you only knew it!). Most of the greatest sages in history have spoken about either or both these concepts (of the Absolute Truth being either Absolutely Everything or Absolute Nothingness), such as the concept of “nirvana” in Buddhism, or in Avatar Meher Baba's book “The Everything and the Nothing” (which is highly-recommended, particularly Chapters 51 to 56, which poetically describe the Ineffable One-without-a-second). Even an ordinary writer, American author Kurt Vonnegut, once penned: “Everything is nothing - with a twist”. The Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics professor, Doctor Leonard Susskind's so-called “minus-first law of physics” states that information is INDESTRUCTIBLE. This is akin to the law of conservation of energy in classical physics, and proves that neither physical or psychic energy is lost. Read subsequent chapters to learn more about how this law relates to the notion of reincarnation, as well as to miraculous phenomena such as savant syndrome. The planet on which we are residing consists of animate/organic life, as well as inanimate/inorganic matter. The six stages of ORGANIC life are: 1. conception/birth 2. growth/development 3. maintenance 4. reproduction 5. ageing/deterioration 6. death British polymath Thomas Young's famous double-slit experiment suggests that matter exists purely as potentiality or as a "possibility" until it is observed by a conscious being. This phenomenon, known as the wave-particle duality, is often discussed in advanced spiritual discourses, as it gives credence to the primacy of Consciousness. There are other aspects of the universe (e.g. the various philosophical approaches to the nature of ontological time, the accelerated expanding universe, holographic universe principle, quantum superposition, wave function, and quantum entanglement), as well as the possibility of life on other planets, the crop circle phenomenon, and the presence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature, which are beyond the scope of this document, and which do not directly relate to the most important thing in life (to find the unending peace/happiness which we humans are ULTIMATELY seeking). “Find out who you REALLY are so that when death comes…there is no-one to kill, for while you are identified with your role, with your name, with your ego, there is someone to kill. But when you are identified with the whole universe, death finds you already annihilated and there’s no-one to kill”. ************* “Just as you depend on the universe, so too does the universe depend on YOU. Everything depends on everything else.” Professor Alan W. Watts, British-American Philosopher. “Who is the perceiver? Universal Consciousness alone is the perceiver. The body is merely the mechanism, through which perceiving takes place and from which the ego is inferred, as the perceiver of other objects. Strictly speaking, there is neither the perceiver nor the perceived. There is only perceiving, as the objective expression of the subjective functioning, of the one Universal Consciousness.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher.
@berniesabado9946
@berniesabado9946 5 років тому
if inflation is set as a law in our universe, then it follows that at some point, the expansion will stop and do a deflation until it reaches another singularity. the question is, can we compute the maximum inflation until the scales are tipped to do the actual reverse?
@helium73
@helium73 3 роки тому
Remember when we thought the galaxies were "Island Universes"? What if all we know and see is just one spherical universe separated by simply more space from other similar spherical universes as far apart from one another as one star is separated from another.
@Gaia_Gaistar
@Gaia_Gaistar 3 роки тому
When I imagine space as clumps of galaxies spanning the universe I imagine universes in a similar fashion across the sea of the multiverse.
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 3 роки тому
9_Bucks Slevin Channel 🐟 05. THE PHENOMENAL UNIVERSE: The fact that the external, phenomenal universe (“prakṛti”, in Sanskrit) of names and forms (“nāmarūpa”, in Sanskrit/Pali) exists solely within personal consciousness (and by extension, Universal Consciousness), is superlatively logical. If this material world actually existed as a separate reality, then obviously, it would have limits, because the nature of matter is that it has a measurable, three-dimensional finitude. Therefore, if one were to travel to the edge of the universe, there would need to be something WITHOUT the boundary of the universe (some other ’’universe’’, which contains this universe). This contradicts the very concept of a universe (literally, “turned into one”). The late, great Professor Dr. Alan Watts’ response to the question: “where is the universe located?”, was: “nowhere and everywhere”. This phenomenal manifestation is composed of space, time, energy, and matter, the latter of which comprises eight elemental groups - the five GROSS elements (“mahābhūta”, in Sanskrit), which are perceivable by at least one of the five senses, and the three SUBTLE elements (“tanmātra” or “atisūkṣma mātra”, in Sanskrit), which are symptomatic of localized consciousness. N. B. Dark matter is not included in this system, as cosmological science has yet to determine its structural composition. The five gross material elements and three subtle material elements are (from most gross to most subtle): SOLIDS (AKA earth - “bhūmiḥ” or “pṛthivī”, in Sanskrit) are made of densely-packed atoms and molecules of a steady shape at room temperature. LIQUIDS (AKA water - “jala” or “āpaḥ”, in Sanskrit) are composed of moderately dense molecules (usually including at least some water) of no fixed shape. GAS (AKA air - “vāyuḥ” or “marut”, in Sanskrit) consists of rarefied atomic particles of no fixed shape. HEAT (AKA fire - “analaḥ” or “tejas”, in Sanskrit) is made of kinetic energy (which may or may not appear visibly as fire, or at least heat waves). ETHER (AKA space - “ākāśa” or “khaṃ”, in Sanskrit) is a vacuum consisting of three-dimensional space (length, breadth, and width). However, recent investigation has confirmed that empty space is actually filled with virtual particles (matter and antimatter). Thus, the explanation for the material universe being created from “nothing” (anti-matter) is plausible, according to quantum field theory. MIND (“manaḥ”, in Sanskrit) is composed of sensual perceptions, instinctual thoughts, abstract images (including memories and fantasies), and emotions. Not all animal species possess a mind, but function purely on base instincts, originating from their genetic code, via a rudimentary nervous system. INTELLECT (“buddhiḥ”, in Sanskrit) consists of conceptual thoughts. Only the very higher species of animal life possess an intellectual capacity. PSEUDO-EGO (“ahaṃkāraḥ”, in Sanskrit) is comprised of the “I” thought (in this case, the illusory, temporal self-identity). Only humans possess the self-awareness necessary to question their own existence. Read Chapter 10 for a full elucidation of egoity. Each of the FIVE gross material elements corresponds to one of the senses of the body. E.g. In outer space, where there is a vacuum (ether), one can detect light with the eyes, yet space is not tactile and cannot be smelled or tasted, nor can sound waves travel via space. At the opposite extreme, solid matter can be seen with the eyes, felt with the sense of touch, tasted with the tongue, smelt with the nose, and heard with the ear (when the solid matter is physically vibrated). Beyond these eight material elements is the TRUE self - which pervades the entire body, and indeed, which is the Universal Self (“ayam ātmā brahma”, in Sanskrit). That explains why we say: “This is my body” or “I possess a mind”. Who is the owner of the body and the mind? It is us, the anti-matter, the inextinguishable authentic self/Self (“ātmana/Paramātmana”, in Sanskrit). Ultimately speaking, the Universal Self alone is. HOWEVER, all eight elements are in fact “made” of Consciousness, since, as demonstrated previously, naught but Consciousness exists. Consciousness is the ultimate reality (“prajñānam brahma”, in Sanskrit). Just as a wedding ring depends on gold for its very existence, so too does the phenomenal universe depend entirely on ”Beingness” or “Isness”, Consciousness, and Blissful Awareness. Although The Absolute cannot be verbally-described, (otherwise, it would be an OBJECT), as a concession to materialists, Infinite Consciousness has said to exhibit three innate attributes, known as “sacchidānanda”, a compounded Sanskrit epithet, consisting of the three words “sat”, “cit” and “ānanda” - Eternal Being(ness), Existence, or Truth; Conscious Knowledge; and Perfect Peace (often translated as “bliss”. However, the term “bliss” connotes an ephemeral experience of euphoria, whereas “peace” is the absence of any form of temporal suffering). Because Absolutely Nothing (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit) is Infinite Creative Potentiality, it actualizes as Absolutely Everything. Attributeless Consciousness at Rest (in Sanskrit, “Nirguna Brahman”) manifests as this phenomenal universe (Consciousness in Action, or in Sanskrit, “Saguna Brahman”). In the verbiage of quantum physics, the enfolded implicate order ‘becomes’ the unfolded explicate order. In REALITY there is no separation of anything at any time (assuming that Consciousness is a “thing”, and that time is an attribute of The Uncaused Absolute). That the total sum energy of the universe is zero, implies the non-existence of matter (i. e. no thing exists objectively). The phenomenal manifestation is eternally cyclical, because ‘coming into existence’ implies ‘going out of existence’, just as ‘black’ implies the existence of ‘white’, or as ‘rich’ implies ‘poor’. Is it possible to have something without nothing? Obviously not, because the two go together, as interrelated opposites. Similarly, despite what most believe, the outer-world is as much the Self as the inner-world. Where is the boundary of the human body? When we look at a person, we cannot see that person UNLESS we also see the background image. The two are inseparable, just as a flower and a bee cannot exist without the other. This fact alone is ample evidence that the universe is a holistic and wholistic system or entity. You who are reading these words are that Totality of Existence, the Highest Universal Principle, the Essential Irreducible Self. In common parlance, you are God (IF you only knew it!). Most of the greatest sages in history have spoken about either or both these concepts (of the Absolute Truth being either Absolutely Everything or Absolute Nothingness), such as the concept of “nirvana” in Buddhism, or in Avatar Meher Baba's book “The Everything and the Nothing” (which is highly-recommended, particularly Chapters 51 to 56, which poetically describe the Ineffable One-without-a-second). Even an ordinary writer, American author Kurt Vonnegut, once penned: “Everything is nothing - with a twist”. The Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics professor, Doctor Leonard Susskind's so-called “minus-first law of physics” states that information is INDESTRUCTIBLE. This is akin to the law of conservation of energy in classical physics, and proves that neither physical or psychic energy is lost. Read subsequent chapters to learn more about how this law relates to the notion of reincarnation, as well as to miraculous phenomena such as savant syndrome. The planet on which we are residing consists of animate/organic life, as well as inanimate/inorganic matter. The six stages of ORGANIC life are: 1. conception/birth 2. growth/development 3. maintenance 4. reproduction 5. ageing/deterioration 6. death British polymath Thomas Young's famous double-slit experiment suggests that matter exists purely as potentiality or as a "possibility" until it is observed by a conscious being. This phenomenon, known as the wave-particle duality, is often discussed in advanced spiritual discourses, as it gives credence to the primacy of Consciousness. There are other aspects of the universe (e.g. the various philosophical approaches to the nature of ontological time, the accelerated expanding universe, holographic universe principle, quantum superposition, wave function, and quantum entanglement), as well as the possibility of life on other planets, the crop circle phenomenon, and the presence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature, which are beyond the scope of this document, and which do not directly relate to the most important thing in life (to find the unending peace/happiness which we humans are ULTIMATELY seeking). “Find out who you REALLY are so that when death comes…there is no-one to kill, for while you are identified with your role, with your name, with your ego, there is someone to kill. But when you are identified with the whole universe, death finds you already annihilated and there’s no-one to kill”. ************* “Just as you depend on the universe, so too does the universe depend on YOU. Everything depends on everything else.” Professor Alan W. Watts, British-American Philosopher. “Who is the perceiver? Universal Consciousness alone is the perceiver. The body is merely the mechanism, through which perceiving takes place and from which the ego is inferred, as the perceiver of other objects. Strictly speaking, there is neither the perceiver nor the perceived. There is only perceiving, as the objective expression of the subjective functioning, of the one Universal Consciousness.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher.
@antwan1357
@antwan1357 3 роки тому
I get the impression that perspective is what makes up a individuals universe .
@donovansalas4642
@donovansalas4642 3 роки тому
Duh.
@Nopicrandom
@Nopicrandom 8 років тому
Well you see there is the DC multiverse and the Marvel multiverse and most recently there is the development of the Dragon Ball multiverse, exciting times indeed lol
@exnbil
@exnbil 3 роки тому
I have experienced "Dying", literally at one point in my life. Unable to re enter my body due to its being no longer able to live. I was able to arrive at a different point in the same life and re enter there and avoid my death when the incident arose that had caused my death the time before. I actually re lived the portion of my life from where i re entered to the point where i I had previously died and I often had wondered what went on in the place where i had died after i left? And if that itself was an alternate universe? It has happened more than once. I have also seen my reflection shift through different images of myself at different locations in different settings of different time periods including past and future. Causing me to wonder if they were other realities existing parallel to this one. I don't know.
@jimtheakston9732
@jimtheakston9732 2 роки тому
I THINK YOU SHOULD THINK ABOUT REGRESSION THERAPY IVE BEEN WHERE YOUR TALKING ABOUT ???
@wayne00k
@wayne00k 2 роки тому
I'm a little late to visit this lecture series so I will confess that I have found great amusement and comfort in this panel's participants - for a collection of scholars whose careers have been so dependent on maths - they sure are loose with specifics regarding time. Don't hate on this observation- I am merely revealing in their enthusiasm with them. :)
@dennistucker1153
@dennistucker1153 2 роки тому
Love these discussions. great minds! I still have no clue how they came to the conclusion that the CMB(thermal image) is some sort of representation of the early universe.
@64TommyG
@64TommyG 2 роки тому
For me it's easy to understand: because the light take so long tme to reach us we practically looks back in time you further you look! No one can say if the stars we are looking at seems or even exist today when we get a look at how they was billions of years ago...
@Quantumdemetrio
@Quantumdemetrio 5 років тому
These guys are like my heros right now, truly living legends. That's amazing.
@neilldn74
@neilldn74 3 роки тому
Alan Guth was the most interesting of them by far and the host just didn't let him talk much for whatever reason.
@m23swwager1
@m23swwager1 2 роки тому
idk why he didn't I noticed that also if you still answer this bc this is a year old post do u remember how the host was towards him ? I felt like the dude was being rude to him and kinda making him sound stupid/making his theory sound not serious.
@scienceexplains302
@scienceexplains302 3 роки тому
Alan Guth keeps making me rethink how I supposedly understand cosmology.
@FlockOfHawks
@FlockOfHawks 8 місяців тому
Curling up 6 Dimensions has always reminded me of the Flatlander theorists' side-note to their introduction of the concept of Height
@powerofthought2294
@powerofthought2294 3 роки тому
By the size of this one, anything that can happen will happen in this one. Nonetheless, if this Universe is the inside of something, than the external part of it or the plane above is even bigger than this one. When we look down we see a continuum state of existence/awareness throughout the microcosm. Could we apply the same rule if there was a chance for us to look "upwards"? Is it too scary if the Universe is a being among others in his own dimension? We can't look out but if we could we wouldn't be able to process the amount of information. Pretty scary isn't it? If we truly consider the Multiverse then we have to consider that it too must be part of another whole, a Universe in which all those Universes exist separately from each other but in the same "sea". We happen to be inside one of them :)
@briancarney3443
@briancarney3443 2 роки тому
...Branes, are what you refer to....
@Moronvideos1940
@Moronvideos1940 6 років тому
My universe is always with me, living or dead ....
@ArizonaPoet
@ArizonaPoet 3 роки тому
The universe seems to be wobbly, with time being the alignment with a particular wobble, and atoms being powered by the friction between wobbles. Time changes because of mass, 100 miles up time is different than on earth's surface, that difference creates the abundance of lightning earth enjoys and the jet streams.
@davidconner-shover51
@davidconner-shover51 3 роки тому
one common architecture in modern computer processors in the end, they execute one process at any given time slot, yet those processes require multiple individual processing steps per clock cycle. these days, with individual branches within the code, multiple parallel processes occur within any given clock cycle, where the processor itself has several subprocessors containing possiblilities of branches and calculations within it's own pipeline chain (currently roughly 2^8), these reduce to one in the end, where the rest of them die off as non viable.
@sammysam2615
@sammysam2615 6 років тому
I accept and agree with the mathematical theory of the multiverse, my question is this; how would cosmologists, astronomers, and astrophysicist actually test and show proof of its existence?
@brianlaroche8856
@brianlaroche8856 2 роки тому
No method exist to date
@nimbette2
@nimbette2 2 роки тому
Have to wait more time for better technology. This is like a slow plodding novel that goes on and on and we can’t seem to get to the end.
@brianmartin6808
@brianmartin6808 2 роки тому
They can't.
@grandadmiralveer670
@grandadmiralveer670 7 років тому
I agree with this theory
@mikeguliano3159
@mikeguliano3159 4 роки тому
It's highhhhly speculative. No evidence.
@lucienberl
@lucienberl 4 роки тому
To start of with a ball of light makes me think these people havent a fuxing clue what yhey r saying. Its all a theory and not a fact. They soind like they are completely brainwashed to me.
@siwilson1437
@siwilson1437 3 роки тому
They simplified it for your fish brain, lushin burl. The temperature was so high not even light could travel through it. I suspect you think evolution is fake, too, and maybe that the earth is flat.
@underrated2064
@underrated2064 2 роки тому
“The multiverse is a concept we know frighteningly little about”
@jameypeltonen3998
@jameypeltonen3998 Рік тому
You should have them do another talk about this and see what they have come up with in the last decade 💛☀️
@Archiekunst
@Archiekunst 8 років тому
43:10 and 81:32 - Best of Andrei Linde... laughed my arse off!
@ent8411
@ent8411 8 років тому
That awkward moment when he says its 8 o'clock and its actually 8 o'clock...
@Ec-tz1ej
@Ec-tz1ej 7 років тому
lol
@thenewrealoriginal4107
@thenewrealoriginal4107 7 років тому
WTF I JUST READ THIS AT THE START OF THE VIDEO AND ITS 8 O CLOCK.
@DannyWilliamH
@DannyWilliamH 7 років тому
just happened to me lol
@mikedelange6102
@mikedelange6102 7 років тому
OMFG geez😳
@mikedelange6102
@mikedelange6102 7 років тому
I am so scared right now
@Quark.Lepton
@Quark.Lepton 2 роки тому
Indeed, a great panel and discussion, but some statements I find inexplicably nonsensical, like, “human thought is finite, so the universe must be finite.” Also, Turok has stated many times previously that ‘there are no gravity waves, so we will never find them’, but LIGO has indeed found them, so basically the credibility of his ‘simplicity of everything’ theories are now lingering somewhere around Kelvin’s statement, “Man will never achieve lighter-than-air flight.” How does he respond now? Very interesting.
@anairamirez8635
@anairamirez8635 3 роки тому
what a great discussion!
@JAGuy
@JAGuy 4 роки тому
I always assumed there were more universe's
@Gaia_Gaistar
@Gaia_Gaistar 3 роки тому
I've been on the multiverse train since the 90's because of comics and sci-fi. I just liked the idea back then though, now it just sounds more plausible.
@IjsBlice
@IjsBlice 3 роки тому
The football analogy was perfect
@caegame9748
@caegame9748 8 років тому
Saying that we should ignore infinity is a nonsense. Sure everything could work for us with always finite amount of data. But if nature is infinite by essence, we should not try to ignore the truth. Or we will never be right. One day in our evolution we could have some need for non finite data. Building our knowledge on potentially wrong ideas is all that we should not do.
@lindabarker8208
@lindabarker8208 4 роки тому
Excellent response - thanks.
@ha_y_nspartan8164
@ha_y_nspartan8164 3 роки тому
Makes me think of how science & religion both focus on infinity and also bond with the universe in their own way. I agree that ignoring infinity is nonsense. Tho if that’s true, then there must be a fine line between the two. Mhm... or maybe science alone is the truth. I’d choose the one that can provide evidence any day. (: Out of curiosities, I studied many different religions & am confident that my opinion is not based on a bias one. Religion seems man made. Like a message being edited/distorted throughout the pages of time. Something to keep people in check throughout life, but also something man-made to secure immortality after death. Thing is... religion can explain the super natural & science cannot. That sh*t’s very real wether someone believes it or not..
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 3 роки тому
Linda Barker Sings: “It ain’t necessarily so...” 🎤
@obobobobobi
@obobobobobi 3 роки тому
Yes is all true. Someone from a different universe came by touched me and told me i was special. 😃
@prettysure3085
@prettysure3085 3 роки тому
Narcissist you are.
@rebelforgod
@rebelforgod 3 роки тому
The Cosmic Background Radiation Map is an image of only the nearest 14 billion light years distance, when it's considered the universe is at least 56 billion light years across. The view inside of a sponge will look differently from different locations, so predicting cosmic fluctuations present the first instant of universal inflation, is very unlikely due to most required data being unretrievable.
@logosoul76
@logosoul76 3 роки тому
I love hearing great minds like this talk, but the more they try to elucidate the nature of our universe for me and the more I take it in, the less I seem to understand.
@eyeheisenberg2278
@eyeheisenberg2278 3 роки тому
They have the same problem. Don't worry, multiverses arent real, only hypothetical, like 2d and fairies. No one has ever seen one or ever will. Not even a hint of one except in their mathematical musing.
@Mid.Yamaha
@Mid.Yamaha 2 роки тому
@@eyeheisenberg2278 we will never see it because of our perspective. Which is also explained.
@netabolt6546
@netabolt6546 7 років тому
i believe in the multiverse. very interesting video but it was a bit long and had to watch it in two parts but none of the less; a very good video and i realy believe in the multiverse.
@daffidavit
@daffidavit 6 років тому
A multiverse is still a Universe.
@moamoa3303
@moamoa3303 4 роки тому
you are so easy to satisfy , i think you believe also santa claus exist because someone told you without any proof that he exist..
@keithbaker9160
@keithbaker9160 4 роки тому
I also believe in Canta Slaus! Lol
@jensbang7329
@jensbang7329 3 роки тому
The more I dont understand.... The more I love it all 😃👈
How Many Multiverses Are There?
1:06:22
History of the Universe
Переглядів 8 млн
Кого увидели? 😱 #shorts #tiktok #иллюзия
00:12
Челсі VS Евертон - Огляд матчу
07:41
Setanta Sports Premier League
Переглядів 205 тис.
🍕Спидран по Новостям #shorts
00:37
King jr
Переглядів 2,2 млн
Was the Big Bang the Beginning? Reimagining Time in a Cyclic Universe
1:26:02
World Science Festival
Переглядів 351 тис.
Alien Life: Will We Know It When We See It?
1:33:30
World Science Festival
Переглядів 7 млн
AI and Quantum Computing: Glimpsing the Near Future
1:25:33
World Science Festival
Переглядів 172 тис.
Einstein and the Quantum: Entanglement and Emergence
1:05:37
World Science Festival
Переглядів 2,3 млн
What Is The Biggest Thing In The Universe?
56:12
History of the Universe
Переглядів 156 тис.
The Dreaming Mind: Waking the Mysteries of Sleep
1:21:58
World Science Festival
Переглядів 1,2 млн
The origin of our universe from the multiverse - with Laura Mersini-Houghton
57:00
The Royal Institution
Переглядів 208 тис.
Why a Forefather of AI Fears the Future
1:12:06
World Science Festival
Переглядів 12 тис.
Loose Ends: String Theory and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory
1:27:24
World Science Festival
Переглядів 2,4 млн
Shedding Light on the Dark Universe
57:18
World Science Festival
Переглядів 121 тис.
Зачем нужна эта кнопка?
0:25
Construct PC
Переглядів 102 тис.
Зачем нужна эта кнопка?
0:25
Construct PC
Переглядів 102 тис.
Честный обзор ПНВ GD918  Снял летающие стержни SKYFISH
42:16
Дмитрий Коржевский
Переглядів 39 тис.