I legit loved the fact that Godzilla picked up best VFX

@@scottmanleyGodzilla Minus One, Oscar winning movie you can't watch. What a time to be alive.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH THATS FUNNY HAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHA

@@alttabby3633I saw it twice. It was a great story.

Didn't watch the Oscars, and didn't watch ANY of the shows involved, win OR lose. I'm SO DONE with the Propaganda.

I believe its just sending zeroes.

Voyager 1 as a consolidated but inert body will outlive everything in the solar system. So will Voyager 2 and New Horizons.

@@freeculture Sometimes I just send Zs, doesn't mean I'm dead.

When you think of how long it was designed to last really it was like a person being active on its 300th birthday - Good Job Little Fellow You are the Best of Them.

Very old and becoming incoherent, but still making more sense than Donald Trump. 😄

I saw them when they were unknown. Small roadside club that seats 30. Decent chicken wings, bad furniture, rocking music.

Maybe depends on the generation. Several people see at these words Humphrey Bogart on a rainy rocket launch area.

"I think this is the begining of a beautiful launch program." [Fades out, music swells.]

007: Rockets Over Casablana

I'm down for that!

I mean just look at Curious Marc and his crew with their AGC restoration etc. It's surely possible.

call it a leak. "this download holds the truth NASA doesn't want you to know about Voyager's systems".

NASA and JPL: "We'll pick it up, once the flaming about which flavor of UNIX is best has died down."

​@jpdemer5 That could be awhile. 😊

I believe the problem is that they don't have much if any useful documentation left and all the engineers that designed it are dead already.

Remote Work: I SHOULD HOPE NOT

We regret to inform you that mileage-based travel reimbursements are not included in the remuneration package.

... "if you're lucky!"

@@peterford5408 They're included, but at a rate of $0.0001 per mile. (A year in orbit gets you about $15k ... which ain't bad if you consider that lodging - with great views - and meals are included.)

@@jpdemer5 The system I'm most familiar with is £0.45/mile for the first 10k miles per year, and £0.25/mile beyond that. The astronauts trade union shouldn't accept anything less!

🤣 was thinking the same thing.

😅

He must be cleaning out his cable tote

better keep this one... just in case I need it later. @@fensoxx

It's the desk of a real nerd. If your doesn't look like that, or worse, then you're just a normie :D

I wouldn't be surprised someone who works there would see your comment and go "🤔"

I suspect that a lot of the original design documentation has gone missing so it is a case of being unable to build an accurate simulation rather than not wanting to.

😂

🤣🤣🤣

I see Cybertruck at 13:48 ?

Hopefully Mars! Someday.

3:56 first attempted 3-way docking maneuver in space.

@@MikeGameOver

Have yourself put in stasis until 2505 and when you wake up that degree will be worth its weight in gold - nobody else will have one!

sadly the station is aging and Russia is pulling out so we wont see things like new dockingmodules that can seat more vehicles at the same time.

A good Douglass Adams sentence if I ever heard one.

@@melvixen1943 I doubt they'll ever de-orbit the ISS if they don't have to, she's a beautiful training station. Keeping her flying will be the right of passage to all new astronaut graduates.

If Starship becomes operational and has sufficient cost reductions, it may be possible to return some part(s) of ISS to Earth to study and/or refurbish. The two SpaceLab modules that NASA used on SpaceShuttle missions (anchored in payload bay) have be sold to private enterprises to be upgraded to become modules of commercial space stations. Axiom Space is one of these commercial space station project. The other possibility is some of ISS modules could be reconfigured, or moved to another space station if a space tub was available. They have value for commercial space activities. Not to mention ESA and Japan both have their own modules.

Haha true, the Rocket Equation does not look favourably upon us People of Size (AKA lard arses)!

@@peterford5408on the other hand 51st state, so that wouldn’t be a problem. 😂

Spotted the guy who’ll sit next to the emergency exit on a Boeing aircraft.

@@CarFreeSegnitz you got that right! Those seats are cheaper and you get the entire row to yourself.

Don't you tell me to have a good day! I'll be miserable and there's nothing you and your orders can do to stop me.

@@sreeser3512 damn. I've been hoist upon my own petard.

@@CarFreeSegnitz dont tell me where to sit, i will sit wherever i want and theres nothing you can do about it

Yeah, 60 minutes seem to have some beef with SpaceX (and sloths).

Let's hope it works. They've burned through all their funding so far

Just another 5 months and we'll be back playing moon golf again 🤪

Starship is the only good thing to come out of this year

@@BESTISD I couldn't agree more!

@@jacoby6000really? I dont thinks so.

I wonder whether they can actually get cameras to the Indian ocean to capture the end of the entry. I tried to find photos of the space shuttle with glowing heat shield, but they seem all be fake. At best we'll get in board cameras.

I don't think it's unlikely it'll get to orbit. Last flight it made it pretty close. Definitely not guaranteed, but I think it's got a fair shot.

its about time 🎉

Who ate all the pies?

made ypu pie eyed? 🎉

-I’m gonna probably die- The sun is probably going to burn out before we see a successful -crewed- flight of -Starliner- Starship.

Are you sick?

@@WWeronko yeah I am.

@@jamesharding3459 at least SpaceX hasn’t screwed up two capsules within the same time span Boeing did with Orion & Starliner. Also ‘26 or ‘27 we’ll hopefully see a crewed launch of Starship or at least the HLS version of it

I am sorry to hear that. I wish you the best.

I'm guessing they'd need a hardware based simulator? Not many people running computers whose design were incepted in 1972.

same🎉

At least it will go with a bang?

At the very least likes not having to sit in the lap of the guy next to him.

Soyuz has been reliable since what, 1968? 50 years of not shiny. mmm. I don't care how shiny. I'd prefer reliable! heh!

​@@lukebrennan5780Dragon has been 100% reliable so far. I have no doubt it'll build a reputation of reliability on par with Souyouz with time.

Yeah. If it's really dying , why not turn everything back on , or at least the camera , and try for one final hurrah .

I was thinking the same, but they might have to sacrifice another instrument to reduce the risk of crashing the flight computer from too low voltage. Also, there was a voltage reg that was disabled recently as well that might be a factor. I can't recall the exact reason they did that other than power saving.

Are you coming on to me?

Nah, they can still operate sometime beyond 2030 at a min with current estimates from the engineers. People were says they didn't have enough power to continue beyond 1995, then 2000, then 2010s... But here we are.

@@3800S1 thoses 2025 prédictions have been there since i was little, so i don't know what you're talking about

When was that? 2 years ago?@@user-vo8zx2uj1p

Yes, Scott mentioned it in a recent video, and I went and looked it up.

It’s on the north coast of Africa west of the straights of Gibraltar, so a polar launch out of south Portugal would overfly it.

@@scottmanley Oh sure, Marroco. Misunderstood you there... Would love to see a launch pad here in Portugal. Unfortunately there are tons of burocracy and laws that make it unlikely. Fingers crossed

Christina Birch is the Lord of the Flies. (Well, technically she is referred to as the 'Class Lead'.)

You don't REALLY have to return 😮😊

I think he applied for both the Inspiration 4 and Dear Moon missions, but was rejected.

He wanted to apply for Dear Moon, but missed the deadline.

It's a demon core meme picture. Scott used it in a previous video.

Pressurized bladder , rotational inertia pushing the fuel against the tank wall where the inlets are , little pixies with buckets , all good .

the header tank is kept full until it's needed so there's no empty space for the liquid to slosh into

There's a few ways. Small tanks can use a bladder or piston to keep liquid fuel at the outlet. Large tanks may need thrusters to push the rocket ahead so the liquid goes to the outlet pipe, then it can light the engine, which the continual thrust will keep liquid where it need to be. And like you said, a header tank to get things started, then acceleration takes care of the rest.

@@kaboom4679 The mischievous pixies huh. That explains IFT-2 I guess.

Only experimental spacecraft have ever done this so we don't really know. NASA's proposals use capillary action, SpaceX has proposed spinning up the two spacecraft to produce artificial gravity. We flew one mission in 2011 on STS Atlantis from what I can tell that tested various methods. Given the small quantity ~1 liter, it was probably pressure-fed. The scale of the spacecraft involved is important, more fuel means it takes much longer to flow across capillaries/more mass of capillaries need to be included, if you spin up big spacecraft you need to reinforce them to handle the spinning mass/waste fuel on spin/down and manage vibrations, pressure-fed systems add substantial complexity (an additional fuel tank/type) and waste mass on the filler gas. Methane/H2/O2 are all cryogenic, which makes things harder than say, hydrazine or ethanol (the fuel NASA tested with).