It's a religion. It's climatology.

Nothing wrong with denying falsehoods.

Any man's truth is another man's lie, mostly based on alternative 'facts' and wishful thinking.. But, lucky for the rest of the world, you guys will very soon be no longer able to pay for the gas needed to drive any car. And that, my transatlantic friends, will be *_your own fault._*

they dont like him because he tells the truth and they don't like the truth

@Jay-Ray Chulu How?

Same bankers that own the fossil fuel industry also own the "renewable" industry. They are just sending all our money to our enemies in China since Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission. Jesus called these bankers and merchants "a den of thieves".

AMAZING IGNORANCE on your part. The Money $$$ is on HIS side. The cheating big wigs that own our politicians and this POS want to do anything they damn well please never mind consequences. Where's the money in protecting the environment? He's a dishonest POS and politicians don't buy off anyone, they are bought off by the fat cats. These Democrats cross-examining this POS are also likely not actually doing anything because they're probably paid off by the same people that support this lying shitbag.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, with sanctions to the left, tariffs to the right, blowing up "allies" pipelines and blaming everyone else for their criminally insane ponzi/casino "economies" and warmongering messes - oops, sorry... "spreading freedumb and demonocracy", as the rotting dollar gets dumped, don't all the 'souled' out creeps along with the desperate parasitic scumbags with their bitch slapped treasonous stooges and slimy presstitutes realize all you are doing is revealing just how broke and totally fracked up the "united" states of murica and king-CONNED-om really are? Time to wake the fracking hell up you pathetic muppets and remember Mother Nature does NOT do "bail outs" and "QE" nor will some sky daddy BS save us from the pathetic, guilt ridden, lemming like arrogant ignorance...

@@noIMspartacus2 you use new age "mother nature" which is a modern name for the sacred feminine of satan, Semiramis, ishtar of Babylon, Artemis of the Greeks, Easter of the Romans, old testament astarte or queen of heaven, a counterfeit Creator while attempting to discredit the true Creator with "sky daddy". At least be consistent in your beliefs, you cannot worship creation unless you believe in a Creator.

Yeah its coal and oil who pay his wages 😂😂😂

It's the same one-two punch with all the false narratives. First, they consistently feed you full of lies, then they censor the truth. The average person who trusts Authority and does not do their own research has no chance.

HORSESHIT. But you are correct about ONE thing, 50 years of the Oil and Gas and Koch Brother NARRATIVE. Worked for YOU.

A, looser

You just described yourself. Good job, there simpleton. You couldn't think your way out of a paper bag.

Fifty years ago were constantly warned about an imminent ice age - when that failed to materialise, we were told the world was heading for extinction due to rising temperatures. That prediction too has failed. John Christie hits the nail on the head.

U of Alabama

Check out Patrick Albert Moore as well. He left Greenpeace when they became a farce.

Absolutely.Similiarly an 'anti-vaxxer' as they like to call are actually 'pro-healthers'.When they use these aggressive terms to 'persuade' the unaware 'their way' then we all should suspect their reasoning for using these terms.

This is all been bull crap from the beginning and they know it or else would Obama and the bidens by beachfront property

He only denied the fake agenda 🙄

Exactly. The glaring absurdity in this “climate change” crap is that, even given that it’s true, the notion that anything can be done about it by destroying civilization is incomprehensibly and preposterously insane.

Ha. Thanks for the laugh.

It's 100% about money

Yeah you can't put a tax on carbon if carbon isn't a problem. Thanks to this good man for speaking the truth.

Money and control!

*Glen Hill* Make it personal, then you'll see results. I don't care what the party says or does, if YOU vote to increase taxation, i am not voting for you next cycle. Simple! Put them on notice that their bull shit excuses for global adventurism ,will not fly. Not funded by tax payer money. Any of their Billionaire buddies want to fund their schemes about controlling the world through pseudo science, they are welcome to bankrupt themselves. Tax payer money is for tax payers. Not funding the Taliban poppy trade, or the Iranian nuclear program. Or Labs in china, who built newer more deadly bio weapons.

It is also about morality: truth, proving that there is no problem is "evil", because some radical persons feel moraly superior and promote the elimination of the "dirty carbon" giving oxygen carbonyl, commonly called CARBON dioxide a black mental picture, when in fact it is invisible. The ignorance of the people in power, who do not know the most elementary fact that vegetation, food is made by plants extracting this gas from the air and combining it with plain old water to form grape sugar called glucose, the required energy coming from the sun. This is so simple, why don't the politicians not know this , or is it money they are after, like explained here?

DemocRAT drones thinking hard facts are "denial". Nothing more, nothing less.

john christie is anti-human

Sez the man with "half a brain".

@@hosnimubarak8869 Civil discussion on Climate and Global Warming. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bXecbZ2Ap32ntHk.html

This whole video was contrived to support the climate hoax industry, but it presented the testimony of Dr John Christy, that just shattered the fake claims of climate alarmists. It's so sad that we have so many people that are so easily convinced that we have a problem and that we have a solution and they understand neither.

@@hosnimubarak8869 Where did you learn about CO2?

@@maxxwellbeing9449 Revkin is a reporter. Lomborg is an author. Meh.

Strange, WHY is he here saying these things? The direct link between co2 and atmospheric HEATING has been KNOWN and physics based for over 130 years. And yet Dr. Christy makes statements to the opposite throughout. He doesn't care anymore? Integrity or sanity gone? Paid-off? Who funds the University of Alabama ESSC? At the ESSC website he even claims there is NO long term trend of drought in the west. Strange.

The use of ‘denial’ simply and neatly confirms that the GW claims are non-scientific.

It's a good title, if anything it leads deniers to actually see this and the facts. Double bluff if that makes sense.

Only because they dont ask any scientists who will actually tell the truth. There are plenty out there. There is absolutely not a 97% consensus that humans are creating any kind of severe risk to the science.

@@danwipper one of. Patrick Moore is another one. He was one of the founders of greenpeace but broke from them because they lost their minds. He speaks the truth about it too. And there are so sooooo many others.

@@danwipper yes he was a great example too.

@@danwipper yep

Notice the “Election” "Climate Science" and "Climate Change" propaganda banners by Google/UKposts fascists that infest UKposts videos. On "election" the link goes to fascist Wikipedia and mentions "insurrection" 65 times with a conga line of Pravda media references. What kind of an uninformed, unread MORON can't see what is a working definition of a corrupt Pravda media that is obscenely joined at the hip with an equally corrupt Democrat Communist-Marxist "Socialist" Party literally lip syncing each other's words and phrases?

They are Democrats. That's what they do: they lie.

Video posted by a democrat committee, what did you expect? But at least they are honest enough to post the video so that you can view his testimony.

130 years ago a stodgy professor did a simple heat transfer physics-based calculation, ADDING CARBON TO THE ATMOSPHERE HEATS THE PLANET.

how are you so certain that this is the truth? what is your proof for it being the truth?

@@mrunning10 We're actually talking about carbon *dioxide* here, not carbon. They are not remotely the same. Nobody disputes that CO2 is a greenhouse gas - so is water vapor - but the climate is vastly complex, and even today, the role anthropogenic CO2 plays in heating the earth is hotly contested.

Our politicians in UK are just as thick

Most of them have a hard time with anything that resembles reality. They live in a little bubble, surrounded by low life losers called lobbyists that whisper lies to them and get them to believe the most ignorant ideas!

They are rather stupid

That's because the real science gets in the way of their narratives...

It's not the science, it's not wanting to be taxed everytime the sun comes out.

Yeah, 7 years ago and they climate change psychosis, scare tactics and green religion zealots just got worse.

And yet, WHY is he here saying these things? The direct link between co2 and atmospheric HEATING has been KNOWN and physics based for over 130 years. And yet Dr. Christy makes statements to the opposite throughout. He doesn't care anymore? Integrity or sanity gone? Paid-off? Who funds the University of Alabama ESSC? At the ESSC website he even claims there is NO long term trend of drought in the west. Strange.

Yup, as he's not,, going with the party line, of the controllers freedom deniers in this land !

@@grassroot011 So, you are afraid that, if the "controllers freedom deniers" have their way, you will not be able to purchase GASOLINE for your cars? or heating oil for your house furnace? or NG for your water heater? Is THAT the "freedom" which you will lose?

Yes. Gasoline = Freedom, baby! I'm a climate hysteria denier. I deny things which are untrue, it's a pesky habit of mine.

Denial means opposing the narrative. As in Covid deniers. and we find they were correct, but nobody cares. Nobody cares about climate change either. When it is nothing in one hundred years, there will be no questions. or they'll try an claims they saved us.

It's crazy how people negate the fact that models are made by people.

This guy is horseshit. Lies with his own data. Why he's still at UAH climate school is THE REAL CONSPIRACY.

Ok l

Because the left wing media controls the narrative

Amazing how few people have viewed this in 7 years. YT sure doing a good job suppressing it.

@@chriscurtain1816 Yes and they also Buried Al Gore Getting Booed off the stage by the entire European Scientific Community. Or the fact that NASA still states Man has Zero effect on Climate. Another Great Reason to never Vote Democrat.

@@chriscurtain1816 So true!

I heard him recently say he had testified to Congress 20 times. They. Don't. Want. Facts.

I think many real scientist been screaming, but they don't fit the crisis narrative. They got silence.

Finally? This was 7 years ago.

The "scientists " are supported by government grants sooooo.

@Nick Yankee - A pretty convincing liar. Unlike all of the present government.

It seems this is very Inconvenient Truth for Climate Alarmists.

Yeah, but the left always say. " There's your truth, my truth and that guy's over there's truth. ? Make sense ? Nope

Yes you are right.. when i found out about climate change it was a really uncomfortable truth

But did you ever hear of AGW? It's this newfangled thing (OK, it's 200 years old) that shows that there are both natural and man-caused forcings. It's TRUE!!! I kid you not. So there's this thing called CO2. OK, let me back up. There are atoms, and...

@@scottekoontz Please explain this in more detail. Just joking. Real science works with falsification and not with verfication intends of the IPCC statements. The IPCC models are falified .

Agw is a lie.

​@@scottekoontz Any forcing experiments are done on an extremely small scale and due to that are completely unable to properly measure them. Such as those old first CO2 experiments. If you have a meter long tube in an experiment and it takes, say, 5 kilometers of air for the whole thing to stabilize, then you'd be able to pump that 1 meter tube full of CO2 practically until it breaks from pressure of the gas and still measure changes. So what exactly does that experiment prove?

Talk to the people who have lost their houses, wealth, and even their loved ones due to the weather getting crazy the last years, storms, floods, fires, and droughts. Talk to farmers who had to give up because their fields are dry as the desert and the groundwater is so scarce it has to be reserved for people to drink. And then dare to say again that climate change is just climate hysteria and that we have never been safer, healthier, and more prosperous than at any time in history.

@@elenamunscher1545 because those things never happened before "climate change" the ultimate "heads I win, tales you lose" scam.

@@elenamunscher1545 You are proving my point. Nothing is "getting crazy". You are behaving like these things are new phenomenon. History didn't start the day you were born. Data proves death tolls from every environmental disaster *including every single climate related disaster* has been in precipitous and uninterrupted decline for a hundred years. The data is indisputable. This is even more impressive when you understand that this occurred during dramatically rising population levels. More people live in Broward and Dade County today than lived on the entire Southern coast of the US in 1900. More people live in Miami Beach today than lived on the entire Eastern Seaboard in 1800. There are simply vastly more things for mother nature to destroy. In the 1800's the population of the planet was 1 billion. They have announced that we have now hit 8 billion. People are living along every river, shoreline and within forests everywhere. In 1850, just 172 years ago the entire population of California was 93,000 people. Today it's 40 million. Thats a 40,000% increase. There is zero evidence that floods, droughts and storms are getting worse. Hurricane Ivan that just hit Florida was a cat 4 hurricane. These kinds of hurricanes have been hitting the US long before the nation ever existed. To see a hurricane, and then blatantly cite climate change is height of irrationality and a classic case of reinforcement bias.

@@elenamunscher1545 I wanted to reply to you, but then I read the other guy's reply and... boy... pls, tell me that you read it! learned it too!

@@andreipopescu5342 I did read it. Not convincing. Here in Europe, glaciers are melting and retreating, which in turn lets river water levels drop alarmingly in summer, threatening the water supply of whole regions. Reservoirs are falling dry, I saw it with my own eyes, and it is the first time in 60 years that this happens to such an extend. Corn stood dried up. the ears without grain. The number of forest fires has increased tenfold since 1960. And if it rains, you get a downpour. Catastrophic flooding from heavy rains have devastated entire villages. And here in Europe, we are still relatively safe. What about the Pacific island which will be buried by the rising sea level? What about Bangladesh? What about the burning tundra and taiga in Russia, the melting permafrost all over the north with who knows which dangerous infectious germs will escape from the melting ice? What about spreading deserts? How many people will have to migrate because they can't live in their homelands any longer? And don't we already have a problem with too many migrants worldwide? And there is many scientific data that confirms that a) C=2 is definitely a greenhouse gas, that b) it's increasing concentration can be directly attributed to manmade emissions, c) the increasing concentration correlates with increasing average temperatures worldwide d) research on past warm periods has clearly shown that CO2 was also the causative factor. We have known this for decades and done nothing or not enough. In case you are religious: Maybe the bible allows us to subdue the earth, but it doesn't allow us to destroy the whole biosphere.

He is. but not because it agrees with your conspiracy climate change denial. And yet, WHY is he here saying these things? The direct link between co2 and atmospheric HEATING has been KNOWN and physics based for over 130 years. And yet Dr. Christy makes statements to the opposite throughout. He doesn't care anymore? Integrity or sanity gone? Paid-off? Who funds the University of Alabama ESSC? At the ESSC website he even claims there is NO long term trend of drought in the west. Strange.

WTF you talking about? This guy is horseshit. Lies with his own data. Why he's still at UAH climate school is THE REAL CONSPIRACY.

Sounds like your God gave the planet more brains than the people? I guess if I were a planet I'd worship him.

I have lived through the "We are all going to freeze to death" phase and now the "The world is going to drown from melted ice caps" phase. Neither argument has ever made any sense to me. I am a child of the 60s and one if my heroes was Dr Patrick Moore. Not becsuse of his views on climate, but because if his stand on cruelty to aninals, such as the seal clubbing and whaling. I was a supporter of Greenpeace, until they lost the plot. Anyone who thinks the world is facing a climate catostrophe unless we radically change our way of life and reach net zero in the UK, should research Dr Moore, who is an actual climatologist, with many years of study under his belt. . Not a teenager with a very rich Godfather who has his own agenda.

Yes! CO2 comes AFTER heating, never before. The suicidal climate cult marches on into global enslavement. 😎🇺🇸

Totally and absolutely SPOT-ON.

Yup, and here in Northern Illinois, same.

Wow so true man I've been telling everybody that we're not actually going to get warmer like all these guys that have fake science degrees or saying we're going to get colder volcanic and earthquakes are going to go up and just a single large volcano could blacking out the sky and cause crops not to grow but they don't talk about any of that and all they want to do is push the green New deal let's talk about that I just watched a documentary so this guy went down to Congo he expected large equipment digging the soil and mining the Cobalt that goes in every lithium-ion battery produces a better longer run time for the car what he saw was literally thousands of people paid hardly anything digging out the Cobalt by hand in large pits it was horrible as he explained these people were children some were slaves and they were doing it all by hand Cobalt is dangerous to be around and these people were doing it by hand with no mask and they're calling it green New deal we are fed so many lies daily and so many people are believing it and they just don't want to hear anybody else say something different but I'm with you I know the real truth and I don't think it's going to matter unless some miracle occurs we are going to all be controlled by the government the whole slogan you'll own nothing and you'll be happy that's where they're taking this they're already started 15 and 20 minutes cities in Europe and Australia and another country which I can't remember this is gone off the rails and there's no stopping unless something happens to change it and the way things are looking we can already see the Republicans are bought and paid for thank you so much for your comment I take every word you said seriously because I've been watching the same information and I know the same truth that you do and no one else seems to give a damn CO2 is not the driver our sun is and by the way CO2 actually is supposed to be good for our plants and our trees so that's my take on the whole thing and I wish that I could alliterate better what I was trying to explain but the whole thing is monstrous and it's going to get worse

There are too many idiots on here to try to reason with. And you are among the worst of them.

The cost of net zero by 2050 is around 200 trillion world wide,and won't have any effect on the climate one way or the other ,cause China will be running hundreds of coal fired power stations,as will most of Asia,so virtue signalling or carbon taxes,the use of unreliables is total lunacy,so China,or India will be the only countries that can produce weapons,or anything else for that matter,just some facts to consider if we still go down this road!

who are "they?" Dr. Christy seems to enjoy a long career at EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE CENTER, even when the UoA publishes data and results that DIFFER from what Dr. Christy says in these congressional hearings, can't figure it out.

And if he in fact is wrong? What then?

In the olden days people use to blame the weather on Cod or Nature. Now everyone blames the weather on the existence other human beings for causing the problems of the weather. Inside the boundaries of the Heliopause, The Sun creates, evolves and maintains everything that Nature creates all around us including you, animals, plants, rocks, Earth, planets, Kyber Belt, asteroids and moons., while regulating their atmospheric temperatures and pressures, (weather) @@JFB1111 If you curse man for what Nature and the Sun creates, then you do not understand Nature.

If you are a scientist why is it that you can't spell you're?

@@nickyankee412 you're an idiot

@Nick Yankee prove it

@Nick Yankee weak b8 m8

@Nick Yankee ROFL, says the idiot CAGW cultist who knows nothing of physics or climate. You head is so deep in the sand that not even your toes are above ground. Climate change is natural, driven by the sun and the ocean currents. Greenhouse gasses have almost zero effect, and CO2 is plant food that is at a dangerously low level at 420 ppm when for 99.99% of the earth's life, it has been over 2,000+ ppm, at times exceeding 8,000 ppm. You have proven yourself to be the consummate liar with no substance. Prove me wrong.

@Nick Yankee > Howard Hamilton LOL, I'm an electrical engineer. I have a pretty good idea > of physics. LOL. EE, taking engineering physics, where they teach you to fill in formulas, and nothing about thinking sounds right from what I have seen you spew. > But more importantly, I respect experts in their field. What's your > education level? Mechanic? Gas station attendant? If that is your take on it, I feel sorry for you. My degree is in computers and math. I have also spent about 30+ years studying climate, reading 1,000s of papers on climate. > You lack any expertise in any field. You suffer from dunning kruger. I am afraid that you are projecting your problems. Sorry to disappoint you. > Look it up so you can follow along. The environmental conditions that > humans evolved under is one of the most stable climatic periods in Earth's > history. LOL now I know you are a CAGW cultist idiot. Only an idiot would consider the periods of glaciation followed by tropical paradise that man evolved through multiple times "stable". > We need to keep it that way. Climate change is natural. But the current > warming trend is not a naturally occurring event. And the lie of the century. The current "warming trend" only exists in the imagination of the CAGW cultists and the fraudulently modified data of James Hansen and Gavin Schmidt. It was warmer in the mid to late 1930's by half a degree than the warmest periods in the last couple decades. > It's caused by human activity. The natural trend is to continue cooling. > We are warming. So how do you explain that, dufus? We have been cooling. The medievel warm period was warmer than the current period, the Roman period was warmer than the Medievil warm period, the Minoan warm period was warmer than the Roman. Human activity has had negligible effects on climate, outside of urban heat islands and the effects of deforestation. And it is going to continuw to cool as the sun goes into its next Dalton minimum. The next 20 to 30 years could see us go into a new miny ice age. And you will be the dufus wearing beach gear while the snow falls around you. > To say greenhouse gases have almost zero effect is one of the dumbest > things you could say. Yet that is what all of the science and evidence points to. When scientists can predict the temperature of all solid rock planets with the same formula relying on distance from the sun and atmospheric pressure at the surface of the planet, including the earth, you know that greenhouse gasses has little to no effect on the temperature. > Seriously, your opinions are patently stupid. You'll notice you keep > repeating the same falsehood with no idea that it's false. Spoken like a true CAGW cultist ignoring the facts. It is actually a perfect self-description of yourself.

And yet, WHY is he here saying these things? The direct link between co2 and atmospheric HEATING has been KNOWN and physics based for over 130 years. And yet Dr. Christy makes statements to the opposite throughout. He doesn't care anymore? Integrity or sanity gone? Paid-off? Who funds the University of Alabama ESSC? At the ESSC website he even claims there is NO long term trend of drought in the west. Strange.

@Tommy Snurkerburger BTDT (been there, done that). He now is a paid shill for several Oil & Gas Lobbies. His points are ALL either 1) ignoring conclusions from the models, he just don't mention them or 2) talks about the recent weather. We've been working the models, simple to computer simulation complex, now for over 130 years, NO CHANGE, add, artificially, CARBON to the atmosphere and you MAY get global warming.

He continues to do REAL science and debunks the ridiculous claims of the alarmists. God bless him!

@@lorendjones He us nit the only ACTUAL scientist who folliws scuentific methids if data collection and research. Fir instance, there is Dr Patrick Moore, co founder of Greenpeace. A look at his work shouldcwake quite a few sheep up.

@@lizeggar2421 I think you need a new keyboard Liz.... haha

Won't be any fresh air left if you morons keep eating this shit up.

​​@@lizeggar2421Can you use use proper grammar?

Oh, they are, to best increase their income from corrupting agents gaining from the warming studies, ETC.

Dr. John Christy is a horseshitter LIAR. And he knows it. His graphs don't even line up with apples-to-apples comparisons, he KNOWS this, but his audience is a bunch of idiot Congressmen so he thinks its' ok. He also believes that "God gave man the oil and coal so it must be OK to use it" Christy = HORSESHIT.

@@mrunning10 Tony Heller has DEBUNKED every fucking thing you bastards said. FACT.

How? Who? This guy hasn't proved a damn thing. He is just spewing "this can't be true" sayings.

@@jimmyf9545 Observations prove the world has warmed .2 degrees C in 50 years. Get a life.

Yes, no joke. That man convinced people to pay him for creating carbon offset credits with no proof of anything. He parlayed that into hundreds of millions of wealth and is still not outed for his grift. The man is a genius!

Al gore and Bloomberg are a part of the problem,as are the WEF,the media,the ABC,BBC,the Guardian,our so called leaders,it's all about power and wealth for those who already have too much,and want more!

@@cantweallgetalong just proves there a lot of STUPID people🤦

@@cantweallgetalong He's as crooked as his hockey stick graph. He purchases carbon credits from a company he has a stake in.

According to him, coastal towns are supposed to be under water since 2016. Still waiting

Wow? You work for an Oil lobby maybe?

Crap. Anyone who is familar with the vast amount of published science can clearly see that denialists are in denial of it in just the same way that an alcoholic or drug addict is in denial that they are addicted. Denialism is a psychological phenomenon that victims suffer from because of the cognitive dissonance they have between what they want to believe and what the truth says. That's why you lot gullibly trust deluded, dumb or deceitful denialist sites and pundits and reject the vast amounts of climate science gathered over 150 years that even the giant fossil fuel companies nowadays accept. Check it out if you dont believe me and look at their corporate websites. Here's an example (not cherry picked) from the largest, Exxon-Mobil. corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-perspectives/our-position "Our position on climate change We have the same concerns as people everywhere - and that is how to provide the world with the energy it needs while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The risk of climate change is clear and the risk warrants action. Increasing carbon emissions in the atmosphere are having a warming effect. There is a broad scientific and policy consensus that action must be taken to further quantify and assess the riskExxonMobil is taking action by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in its operations, helping consumers reduce their emissions, supporting research that leads to technology breakthroughs and participating in constructive dialogue on policy options"

Meanwhile, climate catastrophy crusaders, such as yourself, continue to abuse those of us who have doubts that anyone knows much about climate.

On what do you base the fantasy you have that "doubts that anyone knows much about climate"? That's just monstrously dishonest or stupid. Every National Academy and major scientific organisation worldwide has accepted the findings of mainstream climate science and also all the major Fossil Fuel companies too. They now have unambiguous statements explicitly or implictly accepting the threats from AGW and that that something serious needs to be done about it soon - right there on their corporate websites. It's no wonder you get "abuse" because people like you just never shut up even though your ridiculous weak or non- existent arguments have been shot down time after time after time, yet you people just never seem to understand you have no case. You just keep regurgitating the fuzzbrained crap that has fooled you over and over again. I don't know what's wrong with the way people like you think - autism? terminal stupidity? brain damage? Maybe you're just deceitful political propagandists deliberately crafting and spreading disinformation for some extremist political cause? Who knows? Whatever the reason, incorrigible people like you are dangerously irresponsible and it's about time you stopped muddying the waters and kept your irrational or deceitful views to yourselves and stopped misleading the voters about the risk to all our futures that damn near all of science - and even commercial organisations - say you are. As you were so blind that you appear not to have seen it in my last post, here's the example of Exxon-Mobil again. READ it!!!!!!! Here's an example (not cherry picked) from the largest, Exxon-Mobil. corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-perspectives/our-position "Our position on climate change We have the same concerns as people everywhere - and that is how to provide the world with the energy it needs while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The risk of climate change is clear and the risk warrants action. Increasing carbon emissions in the atmosphere are having a warming effect. There is a broad scientific and policy consensus that action must be taken to further quantify and assess the riskExxonMobil is taking action by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in its operations, helping consumers reduce their emissions, supporting research that leads to technology breakthroughs and participating in constructive dialogue on policy options"

The very simple answer to your question. John Christy is one of the world's leading climatologists. NB: Wtf is an "Acamdeny" when it's at home?

@@joglo3 Read the science. It would be like having 100 agencies confirm the periodic table, you you run around pretending that atoms don't exit. I really don't care who "doubts" climate science any more that I care about people who "doubt" atoms. It's just stupid and annoying.

He's lying.

Priceless. “We have a vested interest in creating panic, because then money will flow to climate science.” John Christy

"“We have a vested interest in creating panic, because then money will flow to climate science.” John Christy" This is pure deceit and you're a gullible idiot. The money available from international Big Fossil Fuel, that has more money than god to identify any significant holes in climate science, is vastly greater than the relatively tiny research grants made to climate scientists. If scientists were truly chasing big bucks, they would be lining up to tell moneybags Big Oil what it would dearly like to hear but they just can't because the threat from climate change is real and most scientists are not corrupted by their ideologies like Christy. Christy is playing to the mindless paranoia of the politicians in the video using the same type of deceitful rhetoric as in the days of the McCarthyism era interrogations. You keep on getting stupider and stupider and still fail to see how you are being deceived. Are you autistic or have some learning disability? Think about it, you nutcase. If the poiltically inspired deceit that those like Christy come out with was real, Big Fossil Fuel would beat a path to their door to seek out their "brilliant" (LOL) insights so their market to sell greeenhouse gas generating fuels wouldn't have to be be greatly cut back. BFF would shout it out from the rootops. Are they? Clearly not, because Christy here is being a deceitful propagandist and the views of denialists like you that suck up this crap are pseudoscientific fuzzbrained nonsense. Even Big Oil who would have a giant financial incentive to find truth in this deceitful pathologically irresponsible crap if it was there, don't believe it. Please stop continuing to display your gross stupidity any longer. It gets tedious.

You really are a muppet, Nico. Which has more money, BIG OIL, or government? No contest.

I have never ever claimed that climate scientists are, or will become rich. Anyway, knowing how much you enjoy hurling insults, I'll give you the opportunity to continue. Various sources report: "Based US government reports, SEPP calculated that from Fiscal Year (FY) 1993 to FY 2013 total US expenditures on climate change amount to more than $165 Billion. More than $35 Billion is identified as climate science. The White House reported that in FY 2013 the US spent $22.5 Billion on climate change.'"

Except maybe if they take his words out of context and to show him to be a "denier".

Or the Guardian newspaper.....

Yeah, because he likley dodgy 2022 11 22 Validation of Satellite Temperature measurements This is by Simon Clark, Atmospheric Physicist and Climate Scientist at Exeter University (a good UK one), Phd Professor. This shows satellite measurement are routinely under reporting temperatures, that they concentrate almost totally on the west m(temperate rich countries), ignoring most of the world. The (3) The surprising bias in climate satellites (and models) - UKposts This is another by Simon and shows that contrary to this youtube with John Christy the models and temperature measurements are pretty well aligned. Not only that and very importantly the models have accurately predicted temperature rises over times where good temperature data could be attained and therefor are highly likely to be correct with their predictions into the future. This contradicts what is said by Christy here. Ie global warming is a very serious problem. (3) Why have climate change predictions been so WRONG? - UKposts This one looks at the hockey stick graph that shows CO2 linked with temperature rise and that this is in tandem as rising very, very quickly since humans started making loads of CO2, 200 years ago, approx. This rate of temperature rise is vastly faster than ever experienced in human history (I would add with rare exception {fact check required re any exceptions at all} though evolutionary history). This directly contradicts Christy’s point. (3) What the Hockey Stick missed about climate change - UKposts Simon does other videos on this topic. I have found the info Simon gives on last one I have listed here regarding people who peddle that the above is wrong totally correct. Fossil fuel money lies behind it (& I would add the likes of the Koch bros). When I see Americans on videos speaking like this I am immediately suspicious and start looking to check this. Plus there is another cluster of traits, most held at one time but not always all, ie part of the US evangelical Christian lobby groups eg anti-abortion types, white well off males, links to the Republican Party, part of the neo liberal/libertarian think tanks and institutes ecosystem. I tried to check this out for the Academic Influence organisation and John Christy. I could not prove this via wikki and a preliminary search. What does stick out is that Christy thinks he is an expert on everything, how people in poor countries can ONLY improve by using fossil fuels, an assumption nuclear is CO2 free (that is not true at all in the life cycle it generates huge amounts of CO2, that 1.5C rise per century is quite normal in geologically (it is not I am a geologist, fact check it yourself), that the effects of a 1.5C temp rise per century is benign, it is not it is disastrous, see the IPCC report, which as Simon shows above is spot on scientifically. So in all these regards plus the information presented via Simons videos (all well sourced, peer reviewed etc) the video Christy and the Academic Influence organisation is presenting is misinformation. My Prediction is that he and the Academic Influence organisation will fit the usual pattern of insidious networks and characters aa. Ie totally insincere, amoral actors. I have been 100% correct so far after about 4 years doing this properly after becoming aware via so called “professionals” writing nonsense and lies on Linkdin. I love the US people who are likely to respond to this. You get your knickers in such a twist so easily on this topic. Mostly you make really stupid ignorant comments. Can’t wait.

I definitely won't see him on the BBC - I haven't watched ANYTHING on the BBC in my own home for over 20 years as I find it corrupt, biased and presenting self serving Woke propaganda.

@@controversiallygreg311 well then you ate stupid.

In Dr. Christy's mind, it is not a lie to tell God's Word.

YOU are INSANE.

yep!!! My thoughts exactly. Perhaps it was done intentionally to get climate alarmists to actually listen to what this man has to say.

"just shut and buy our EVs, we're heavily invested, sheep." -Climate Clown politicians

@@onenationunderground2360 they are making China more money 💰 🤑 and hurting children in Africa who mine for cobalt.

You get it wrong. The idea behind it is to point out that Dr. Christy is "climate denier" so that later when you use his knowledge in the discussion they can simply say that you are "denier" too and dismiss whatever you say. They don't have to care about scientific method if they their fabricated "consensus".

Keep up with your area temperature and the history of it highs and lows both can see for yourself there is absolutely no difference and also if you're a Christian we Believe God was smart enough to anticipate all of this he created it and it's perfect

YES PEOPLE LIKE GATES SAY GO SOLAR. THEN IN THE NEXT BREATH HE WANTS TO DIM THE SUN. TELLS EVERY THING WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE CO2/CLIMATE SCAM.

Well said - not enough people mention this very important fact .

And don't forget the above & underground testing of explosives.

The politicians you see in this old vid were paid to get elected by fossil fuels lobby pacs spacs cock brothers whatever. these vids are done and posted to SHOW those overlords that their money was well spent.

Those that abuse capital letters emphasise nothing but the hysteria of the abuser who by abusing capital letters declares to all the world that he is a raving lunatic; no point is improved by being shouted. calm down dear

because of idiotic laws that put them at unjustifiable risks classic example is what happened to the seismologists in Italy who were indicted for a seismic event that they could not have predicted...and the Italians wonder why the rest of the world laughs at their bizzare justice system

, look back to late 40 durning these droughts.look fire patterns. We had fire fighters equipped and they kept this from happening.We the people are being duped by anyone taking money involved in the loans and contract fake company’s .We need army of researchers Auditing the whole government .

This army need to be drafted to do this adit from populations.

This is why IPCC uses those faulty "models" an "expert's judgement" as "evidence". If they used only scientific method, they would have no case and they would get dismissed.

Without Co2 we are doomed,plant's need it to photosynthesis, no Co2 no plant's, no plant's no food ?

Climate change cultists are paleontology and astronomy deniers..EVOLUTION is ONLY driven by regular climate change:)

It doesn't exist.

Yep. They keep repeating it and repeating it but never give proof. And if they do it's the most unscientific nonsense one has ever seen.

HOSRESHIT conspiracy brainwashed "truth"

You can't say right on sir thanks for telling the truth and finnsh with god bless . You can't have it both ways

@@George.Andrews. I certainly can, have it both ways. WEF, Beijing, puppet Trudeau and his Canadian democracy killing corrupt coalition will never stop me from that. Or are you just talking about the English language?

it’s not the truth, it’s just what you wanted to hear

@cowfat8547 I have a feeling that if you called John Christy a liar to his face , he would disassemble your arguments and hand them back to you in better shape.

Maybe that is why the globalists are mowing down those ancient plants, to build their ecosystem-killing solar farms and wind farms.

Exactly.

Miniscule

The Bible tells us that the sea WILL , RECLAIM WHAT BELONGS TO THE SEA , AND THE EARTH WILL RECLAIM WHAT BELONGS TO IT. If you have a problem with that particular Quote ! Then go to the MAN , that inspired the writer to write it , (GOD ALMIGHTY ) IF YOU CAN OR THINK YOU CAN KNOW MORE THAN THE CREATOR , PROVE IT , OTHERWISE , LEAVE IT ALONE. I SUGGEST , YOU LISTEN , BECAUSE THE CREATOR KNOWS WAY MORE , THAN HE THAT WAS CREATED ! THAT'S MY STORY , I AM NOT A GOD DENIER ! PRAISE OUR CREATOR , FOR HE IS WORTHY ! IN JESUS NAME , I PRAY . AMEN THANKS TO MR CHRISTIE FOR HIS TRUTHFUL ANSWERS TO OWN STUDY. THESE CLIMATE PEOPLE JUST , WANT TO MAKE MILLIONS OFF OF NOTHING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HONESTY ! BLESS YOU

Couldn’t follow the science but we sure can follow the money.

@@Daniel-nr2uf Yep.

other way around my dude

@@cowfat8547 All the man does is essentially collects temperature data from a NASA satellite, and those dumber than a box of rocks wants to argue with what the data shows...Do you also yell at thermometers when they don't read what you'd like them to?

@@mikevw6767 John Christy is a Southern Baptist and has made clear that his faith and his experience having done missionary work in Africa influence his beliefs regarding climate change. Christy supports the intelligent design movement, a fundamentalist Christian variant of creationism that claims intelligent design proves evolution to be false. So, you are getting your climate info from a guy who believes humans and dinosaurs walked together on Earth at the same time.

Yes, this channel is probably a parody of climate alarmism

@@hosnimubarak8869 Cause you found something on a blog, took a very small portion of what it actually stated, you somehow think this totally discredits what the man has said on a totally unrelated topic? You used to believe in a man dressed in a red suit who traveled the entire world in one night....so therefore I don't believe a thing you ever write.

Sad but true. In the US, most conservatives align themselves with climate science aliteracy. I've never seen such a desire for one group to thrust their gut feelings instead or reading some science before. It should not be partisan, and if you were to realize that the basics coming from every single science organization in the world align, you'd realize how aggravating this is. It would be like all Republican politicians deciding that radioactive waste was safe to dispose of in landfills, and they have a "scientist" from Heartland there to prove it.

John Christy is correct, he has the courage to say so. The one fact that gets ignored is that the people who live in high altitude plains are not able to grow food with the same land area as in low altitudes. Why? Because the co2 content per volume decreases with increasing altitude ,for a case in the highland in Bolivia the co2 content is barely 0.37 gram per cubic meter about 62% compared to sea level. Without supplemental co2 no adequate farming of grain is possible for the growing poor population. Enclosed transparent areas that could retain supplemental co2 are far too expensive. The only practical solution is to actually let the co2 concentration rise to at least from o.o4% to o.o6% for a sustainable food production . The intent to artificially capture and sequester co2 is cruel for that population, especially since any increase in today's concentration has a negligible effect on the average temperature increase. Today most of the grain is transported by truck from the lower lands. The recent high increase in fuel costs are detrimental to the population. That is the reason to try to locally grow the food, an almost hopeless situation today, without supplemental co2. . The removal of co2 from the air and sequestration will not happen any way, but the efforts to reduce emmissions will most likely happen with tragic effects on the people living on the ,"Altiplano", south east of the large water resource , the Titicaca lake.7

@@arturoeugster2377 " Enclosed transparent areas that could retain supplemental co2 are far too expensive. " Cost is relative. When a great need arise, the cost becomes inconsequential.

@@scottekoontz And the Democrats do exactly the same with the ‘funding’ of science !

100% CORRECT

Ireland is sitting high above the waves. Our German island do not. We have to add sand to them every year, otherwise, those in the North Sea would already have been badly damaged.

@@elenamunscher1545 what the hell are you babbling about, Ireland is sitting where its sat for millions of years, the beaches and shoreline is still the same as it's always been, so again, what are you babbling about? Oh, and boo hoo if you are having problems trying to reclaim land that is at sea level, that's not the seas problem it's yours.

@@elenamunscher1545 you'll have to explain to me in a bit more detail how, as you claim the sea level is rising in Germany but around Ireland it's still the same as it has been for as far as anybody knows, for thousands of years?

See Simons Clarks youtube on the topic you mention here, Ill add the below as this debunks this brown and smelly shown here 2022 11 22 Validation of Satellite Temperature measurements This is by Simon Clark, Atmospheric Physicist and Climate Scientist at Exeter University (a good UK one), Phd Professor. This shows satellite measurement are routinely under reporting temperatures, that they concentrate almost totally on the west m(temperate rich countries), ignoring most of the world. The (3) The surprising bias in climate satellites (and models) - UKposts This is another by Simon and shows that contrary to this youtube with John Christy the models and temperature measurements are pretty well aligned. Not only that and very importantly the models have accurately predicted temperature rises over times where good temperature data could be attained and therefor are highly likely to be correct with their predictions into the future. This contradicts what is said by Christy here. Ie global warming is a very serious problem. (3) Why have climate change predictions been so WRONG? - UKposts This one looks at the hockey stick graph that shows CO2 linked with temperature rise and that this is in tandem as rising very, very quickly since humans started making loads of CO2, 200 years ago, approx. This rate of temperature rise is vastly faster than ever experienced in human history (I would add with rare exception {fact check required re any exceptions at all} though evolutionary history). This directly contradicts Christy’s point. (3) What the Hockey Stick missed about climate change - UKposts Simon does other videos on this topic. I have found the info Simon gives on last one I have listed here regarding people who peddle that the above is wrong totally correct. Fossil fuel money lies behind it (& I would add the likes of the Koch bros). When I see Americans on videos speaking like this I am immediately suspicious and start looking to check this. Plus there is another cluster of traits, most held at one time but not always all, ie part of the US evangelical Christian lobby groups eg anti-abortion types, white well off males, links to the Republican Party, part of the neo liberal/libertarian think tanks and institutes ecosystem. I tried to check this out for the Academic Influence organisation and John Christy. I could not prove this via wikki and a preliminary search. What does stick out is that Christy thinks he is an expert on everything, how people in poor countries can ONLY improve by using fossil fuels, an assumption nuclear is CO2 free (that is not true at all in the life cycle it generates huge amounts of CO2, that 1.5C rise per century is quite normal in geologically (it is not I am a geologist, fact check it yourself), that the effects of a 1.5C temp rise per century is benign, it is not it is disastrous, see the IPCC report, which as Simon shows above is spot on scientifically. So in all these regards plus the information presented via Simons videos (all well sourced, peer reviewed etc) the video Christy and the Academic Influence organisation is presenting is misinformation. My Prediction is that he and the Academic Influence organisation will fit the usual pattern of insidious networks and characters aa. Ie totally insincere, amoral actors. I have been 100% correct so far after about 4 years doing this properly after becoming aware via so called “professionals” writing nonsense and lies on Linkdin. I love the US people who are likely to respond to this. You get your knickers in such a twist so easily on this topic. Mostly you make really stupid ignorant comments. Can’t wait.

Yeah,I lived on the beach on the north west coast of Tasmania,when I was a kid,lived on the sunshine Coast,lived at Tannum Sands where I had the maintenance contract at the Aluminium plant on Boyne Island,now live on the coast in Thailand ,and none of these places showed any rise in the sea levels whatsoever,and as far as I am concerned,the climate alarmism is the biggest ponzi scheme ever perpetrated on mankind!

The oceans are getting warmer, which determines the climate. Polar ice melts and large lakes are formed locally, which are also warmed from below, which is not global warming. The earth is very dynamic, with many eruptions, especially in oceans, but glaciers also often slide faster in the sea or melt in the mountains, because it gets warmer. The first 20 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere gives 80% of greenhouse effect. At 100 ppm the effect is already very much reduced and at the current 420 ppm it no longer has a significant influence. 95% of the greenhouse effect comes from water vapor / clouds, as is known. Calculation models based on CO2 will never be correct, because that is not the cause of global warming. The earth is 99% warmer than 4500 degrees Celsius and of the remaining 1%, 99% is warmer than 100 degrees Celsius. We live on the other 1- ten thousandth part. Humans can do nothing about this global warming. If one were to realize that, one would do very different things with the 1 billion dollar a day that is spent worldwide on so-called climate improvements. It is very striking that people know so little about CO2, fear reigns, but for CO2 that is completely unnecessary, everything grows through CO2, including our food. Below 180 ppm there is world hunger and at 150 ppm everything dies. Why is it not known that the greenhouse effect of CO2 decreases very quickly (exponentially) with its increase and now has virtually no effect? Why do people immediately start accusing people who tell something different from what they have always heard? Why don't people want to think about it further?

Temperature rise in the oceans will also result in more algae, some of which a deathly dangerous to fish. Google algae bloom.

@@elenamunscher1545 Yes, the oceans are getting warmer, from below just like the ice.

@@elenamunscher1545 That is indeed disturbing, they should first admit where that heat really comes from. In any case, it is not due to the CO2, so do not build windmills and burn trees in a bio-plant, but reinforce dikes. You can't protect fish. There are places where there are always floods when it rains harder, but nothing has been done about it for decades. Then you easily blame the climate. In 1953 the dikes in the province of Zeeland (Netherlands) broke through, it was a major disaster with almost 2000 deaths, things also went wrong in England. Those dikes with us had not been properly maintained for more than 100 years, that was the main reason for this disaster. At that time people did not blame the climate, because that word did not "exist" then, it had nothing to do with it. Now they would immediately blame the CO2, but you can also blame Putin for everything. We're so far in this world now that we don't even want to know the real cause. As a human being you cannot do anything about the heat from the seabed, not even a volcano. . You can try to protect yourself against higher water.

Yes plus the measured fact (since 1964) that there is huge, deep CO2 band notch in radiation to space and there's no reason to think it's set in stone and cannot get bigger. Christy & all in that bunch of scientists (as opposed to the nutters in the rank & file) deliberately do things like relying on the huge natural fluctuations of the ocean (which is what decides how fast the heater is permitted to heat the surface and how much the ocean takes for itself).

Nope, not at all.

additionally at 23:23 that puppet implied 'double standards' to Dr Christy when Dr John said he based his calculation on old existing models cus we don' t have working ones yet , but I bet it was gladly used anywhere else when cut out from the context

HORSESHIT and LYING before Congress