Need Of Religion In Today's Time | Javed Akhtar | Makarand Paranjape | Shoma Chaudhury |
Переглядів 264,164
День томуIn 21st century, what is the role and need of religion? When two minds as brilliant as Javed Akhtar and Makarand Paranjape sit down to discuss this, it surely becomes one of the most interesting conversations.
Javed & Makrand dive deep into their own thoughts and beliefs of religion and faith. With this, they also dive into the realms of dharma and spirituality. While one is against religion, the other is a staunch believer of it, while one stands by logic and reasoning, the other believes in the existence of dharma and quantum physics. While there are two such different people on the panel, the conversation goes in all the directions it can.
This session was recorded at IFP 12.
Chapters:
0:00 - Intro
3:57 - Javed Sahab Is Against Religion
4:43 - What Is Faith?
6:05 - Faith & Stupidity is Same?
6:18 - Problem of Religions
7:05 - What is The Distinction Between Dharma & Religion?
8:01 - Religions are Not The Same
10:28 - Complicated Word - Spirituality
10:53 - Is There Any Hierarchy in Religions?
13:00 - India Has Pluralism
14:25 - What Is Dharma?
16:36 - Belief in Religions
17:03 - What is Conscious Mind?
18:11 - What Is Spiritualism?
20:43 - Believing in The Religion & Spiritualism
25:21 - Who needs Religion?
26:42 - Religion & Politics
27:42 - Hindutva And It's Loss
28:55 - Can Religion Be Good & Bad?
30:38 - Against Purdah, Hijaab, & Triple Talaq
31:37 - Meaning of The Word 'Religion'
33:00 - Sholay & Religion
33:55 - What is The Strength Of Our Country?
35:10 - God is Santa For Adults
36:03 - Sanatani Accords
38:39 - Role of Religion
41:13 - Debate Over Manusmriti, & Mughals
#ifp #ifp12 #javedakhtar #makarandparanjape #religion #areligious #debate #conversations #conversation #religiousbeliefs #politics #political #debating #spirituality #spiritualism #spiritualawakening #consiousness #consiousmind #consious #faith #believer
@razhusain2298 Місяць тому
I feel a lot of people who are making negative comments are afflicted with some kind of religion.
@PramodKumar-gy8lb Місяць тому
Atheism is a very honest position. Faith is bs.
@jostnamane3951 22 дні тому
You included. Secular materialism is a fringe religious movement that is supposed to be an alternative to traditional religion but fails to answer a simple yet self-destructive moral dilemma, the 'IS-OUGHT' problem.
@beinglogical3188 17 днів тому
Andhnamazi in Gangamstyle💥 Pedo Ola
@ankitBhartiya2 16 днів тому
Victim Card Everywhere. 😅
@richcohen5936 14 днів тому
@@ankitBhartiya2 Lol when that guy was whining about getting screwed by Akbar, that's not victim card?? If beta males were not able to protect, they should just accept then they were weak then by your argument. You want to have the cake and eat it too...How RIDICULOUS!!!
@neetakarnik331 Місяць тому
Javed Akhtar rocks. All fluffy, all big words cannot hide the truth and reality of adharma.
@beinglogical3188 17 днів тому
Andhnamazi in Gangamstyle💥 Pedo Ola
@beinglogical3188 9 днів тому
Peaceful 🐽following his scientific rolemodels sunnat of gajwa e hind pissfully..Masha🕉️ Lovejihad then convert lekin apna adhi akal vala maal Tent mai😂😂
@zenturtle_1 Місяць тому
No religion, only humanism ❤
@jostnamane3951 Місяць тому
Define "humanism" and "religion" on your worldview
@mayankindian3750 Місяць тому
Humanism ko bhi define Kar de bhai
@dhrbolai 28 днів тому
No isms
@user-fm7ok7pn6y 27 днів тому
You are mad
@jostnamane3951 24 дні тому
@@dhrbolai any worldview with its presuppositions is an "ism"
@rizwankhan-pz8eb Місяць тому
Beliefs and faith By questioning.. Caves and trees.... Javed sahab in opening statement itself heavier than professor sahab whole statements
@ShaneCallum 2 місяці тому
I am a christian but sorry Indic religions and Middle Eastern religions are not the same. Fundamental outlook towards the world is different thereby the outcome. Abrahamic religions at the basic are rule driven, which is why you can quantify the tangibles in these societies. Indic religions on the other hand are fundamentally not rule based. Which is why there are so many sects within Indic religions. So I agree with Makrans for not falling for Javed’s trap
@rabinderkoul1577 2 місяці тому
India does not even has the concept of religion.
@sivaramanmudaliar9728 2 місяці тому
Baloney & crap . Shankaracharya, the high priest of Sanatana, said there are shanmatas, ie, 6 religions & called them Soura, Shaktya, Shaiva, Kourmarya,Ganapatya & Vaishnava . Besides , he also wrote in Soundarya Lahari about Dravida. If Dravida was a mere geographical denomination, he , as somebody born in today's Kerala, would have called himself also as a Dravida
@faizan_farooqui 2 місяці тому
I don't know why Christians pretend as if Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) was not from the middle East?
@muhammadalikhan7605 2 місяці тому
absolutely right. In Islam rules are defined by God.. We cannot ignore divine rules depending upon the time era
@arnoldschwarzenigga2268 2 місяці тому
@@muhammadalikhan7605 We don't consider your rules divine, we consider them evil.
@p4umce 2 місяці тому
Akbar did not translate Ramayana and Mahabharata into European languages, it was Dara Shikho, Shah Jahan's son who was slaughtered by Aurangzeb.
@SWAMISWAMI-ie5gf Місяць тому
Abdul Qadir Badauni translated the Ramayaṇa and the Mahabharata and many Sanskrit tales and the Hindu epics in Persian in accordance with the wishes of Akbar
@omieyadav638 Місяць тому
@@SWAMISWAMI-ie5gf true
@Inthemoment3674 Місяць тому
Dara shikoh converted bhagwat gita and upnishads in Persian not ramayana
@Marsalllll 19 днів тому
India’s gdp may have been high at the time but the per capita income was the poorest most of the money was sent to ottomans, Mecca and the like Aurangzeb destroyed entire agricultural regions by stampede with horses resulting in millions of death due to famines
@manavchoton 8 днів тому
Oye illiterate.. It was Akbar who commissioned for its translation.. And only after that came with the idea of din e elahi😂😂😂.. Sanghi better get your facts in place
@user-qr6xg1tl7i 25 днів тому
Mr Javed Akhtar is not only a great poet but a great scholar too.His views are subtle and as authentic he is loved for his liberal views all over the world. Salute to u jenab Javed Bhai u r an integrated personality we all respect n love u.Mr Javid bai makrand is shifting from one point to another and is not certain & clear what he says.
@Marsalllll 19 днів тому
India’s gdp may have been high at the time but the per capita income was the poorest most of the money was sent to ottomans, Mecca and the like Aurangzeb destroyed entire agricultural regions by stampede with horses resulting in millions of death due to famine
@beinglogical3188 17 днів тому
Andhnamazi in Gangamstyle💥 Pedo Ola
@beinglogical3188 9 днів тому
Peaceful 🐽following his scientific rolemodels sunnat of gajwa e hind pissfully..Masha🕉️ Lovejihad then convert lekin apna adhi akal vala maal Tent mai😂😂
@abhyuday1294 12 днів тому
If by any chance a kid is watching this debate...it is no brainer he will relate to Javed Saheb much more than Makarand, this point in itself is proof that clarity in thought and idea transcends to the real nature of humankind. Not those big hocus pocus set of statements thrown at you making you believe in other worldly ideas. We need more people like Javed Ji. ❤❤
@Ram-gy1yv 2 місяці тому
Is it debate or reel? Why anchor cutting both in every 2minute without clear explanation? No use of such kind of thing if not proper debate
@TedoR2011 Місяць тому
U think you're better 😅
@parshusaki1763 2 місяці тому
Javed has made an accurate point in saying that we can't be selective. Rightly so!
@MrVish6666 2 місяці тому
javed is an old bozo
@neverEndingvoid525 25 днів тому
@@MrVish6666and so is your mother and father ? But you don't see us complaining about it 🤷🏻♂️
@beinglogical3188 17 днів тому
Andhnamazi in Gangamstyle💥 Pedo Ola
@beinglogical3188 9 днів тому
Peaceful 🐽following his scientific rolemodels sunnat of gajwa e hind pissfully..Masha🕉️ Lovejihad then convert lekin apna adhi akal vala maal Tent mai😂😂
@JASIRORBOY 22 години тому
@@neverEndingvoid525 you can't complain about his parents because they are not setting narrative in public meetings like javed. At least think before writing this kind of statement 🤦
@laxminarayan-vg7ms Місяць тому
Jab kabhi bhi javed sir ko sunnte hai( lisen) hai . Aur bhi naye tarike se rational,logical human bann jate hai So thanks sir❤
@shubhamombale Місяць тому
Prof. Marakand is missing the theme of the debate here and is giving it a Hindu vs Muslim angle stating Hinduism is better while Javed Akhtar is condemning both the religions.
@curious_one1156 Місяць тому
That was his entire agenda. He is a snake.
@razhusain2298 Місяць тому
Absolutely correct.
@user-bx3sx9gt8b Місяць тому
Am Hindu agnostic and your right ,
@zirmilekunal8120 Місяць тому
This type of prof. having brain in tha ass
@rj23lolwa Місяць тому
theres nothing called hinduism, hes just trying to say indian traditions are different from what religion is.
@soiwas 2 місяці тому
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY CUTS IN THIS ????? WE WANT AN UNCUT VERSION OF THIS PLEASE !
@Narendersingh-id5ng 2 місяці тому
Markand ka gala katwana hai kya bhai
@hgangwar41 2 місяці тому
Thanks. I was about to watch it. But due to the CUT thing I'm gonna leave this without watching and disliking as well.
@RT-oz3lg 2 місяці тому
@@Narendersingh-id5ng 😂
@nyayendar 2 місяці тому
Because RSS and DHONG r synonyms
@Human-xz2gr 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar has very shallow knowledge and he talks nonsence. India was already rich before the Islamic invaders came. In fact only because of its wealth the invaders wanted to be here and plunder it.
@sandeepsingh-fj2ff 2 місяці тому
Seriously Javed sir nailed it. Other debater's should prepare well. Speaking difficult words does not make any impression. So, Be simple and connect to the audience, do not speak to himself.
@user-cj3oj6xg7w Місяць тому
That's limitation of your mind Mr MAN SINGH
@user-pm4jo5uz4r Місяць тому
is there a faceoff between muslim believer vs javed, and javed is bashing off quran and hadith. First try to Clean your house and community.
@edaljhaveri2414 Місяць тому
Wow, I feel Javedji is just superb, when makarandji was speaking, I was having the same impression that this man is somehow trying in vain to cover up and then when Javedji comes, he is so bang on and accurate. Just loved it 👍
@Azazel-zo1gx Місяць тому
Javed does gave cognitive inconsistencies and manipulatuing facts which makrand doesn't
@Thinkwithme-mt8lu 4 дні тому
India needs people like Javed Akhtar,he is the true unbiased atheist i have ever seen.
@sagarjoshi8444 2 місяці тому
34:02 When javed saab said "hindus should not behave like muslims" , he himself is saying majahab is different than dharma. So javed saheb doesnt know what he is talking
@sabinmasahary2225 Місяць тому
Deep down inside Javed akhtar is a follower of Professor Makarand. The mediator was like what's wrong with him. Instead if contradicting why is he agreeing with the Prof. Let me change the topic to Hindutva and Hinduism.
@whatsgood7840 Місяць тому
Hindus historically have been very different from Muslims. But this doesn't mean Hinduism as a religion is any better than Islam as a religion. It is also filled with useless rituals and made up laws and discrimination, just like other religions. But yes, Hindus have historically not acted so dogmatic and violent as Muslims. This doesn't mean their religion makes more sense. The good thing about Hindus is they have allowed people to even disagree with their central scriptures, but even in this they are admitting that their scriptures also have some questionable things.
@cracked8349 Місяць тому
@@whatsgood7840as an atheist true can't even argue with muslim folks
@JoJo-hj4tx Місяць тому
That right wing professor couldn't understand javed sahab point that all religions are the same because as you can see any country doesn't matter from which religion they have following but whenever they choose religion instead of secularism they have totally been vanished like iraq iran Afghanistan pakistan Even if you go to india before democracy then you can easily find out beautiful sati pratha breast tax child marriages devadasi niyog etc etc even you can compare current india from 20 years old India then 20 years old india was much progressive than the current india just because of religious politics
@jostnamane3951 Місяць тому
@@JoJo-hj4tx you have absolutely no understanding of how power structures work and why certain countries are sanctioned for having a different perspective or outlook on life.
@rochakkhandelwal7135 2 місяці тому
Hi. Can you please upload the uncut version?
@anujsingh4771 Місяць тому
JAVED AKHTAR is a real Liberal and secular Man.
@beinglogical3188 17 днів тому
😂😂😂
@Astrophile2345 14 днів тому
I think he is in the middle ground between liberal and conservative ideologies , atleast better than being at the extremes of both sides.
@shiva4ever 9 днів тому
No he isn't....he is merely promoting his own credentials egotistically.....there is so much he hides....he talks of the impermissibility of Sholay today and cleverly shoves films like PK under the carpet.....totally agenda driven
@minhazali4090 День тому
@shiva4ever Only after PK , he realised the Sholay scene could not be done today .
@marieclaire7995 Місяць тому
Fully agree with Javed sir's points.Was surprised to see so many critical comments against him.But the audience reacted differently.
@deepakkumarmalik0894 Місяць тому
Exactly
@jhunuj6243 2 місяці тому
For Hindus central scriptures are Upanishads and Gita but not Manu Smriti.
@adityanjsg99 2 місяці тому
Manu means law giver. They change from time to time. Stuti means facts, smriti is all about interpretation
@brahm-ahamasmi 2 місяці тому
For Hindus, there are no "Central" scriptures. Every Hindu can choose what to believe and there is a huge diversity.
@Travis12340 2 місяці тому
As usual
@jhunuj6243 2 місяці тому
@@brahm-ahamasmi we r people of vedic civilization. Essence of Vedas is captured in Upanishads and encapsulated in Bhagwat Gita. Bharat was a vast country from Afghanistan to Indonesia. Many people have written many things. Only those portions are to be accepted which are in agreement with Upanishads and Gita and rest not to be considered.
@rrao7963 2 місяці тому
@@jhunuj6243rightly said
@beenasingh3316 2 місяці тому
❤makarand Paranjape you have just established our feelings so well. Shoma could not discipline him 😂
@JoJo-hj4tx Місяць тому
That right wing professor couldn't understand javed sahab point that all religions are the same because as you can see any country doesn't matter from which religion they have following but whenever they choose religion instead of secularism they have totally been vanished like iraq iran Afghanistan pakistan Even if you go to india before democracy then you can easily find out beautiful sati pratha breast tax child marriages devadasi niyog etc etc even you can compare current india from 20 years old India then 20 years old india was much progressive than the current india just because of religious politics As he said there was not any words like dalit but the question is why were the aystem of upper & lower caste this is how religion evolved & extremism born for ex islam came from saudi arabia but if you see the saudi islam then you can find out shia & sunni islam but when that islam evolved in india then ahmadia islam happened even there are majority of muslims who óppose ahmadia as a muslim but the point is this is how religion evolved just like a cancer if it happened in your body then it can be grown up
@positivelife7633 Місяць тому
Makrand is talking realistically, he doesn't answer questions straight away, while he certainly can
@param953 Місяць тому
Quotes.: I was reminded of a quotation by the famous American physicist, Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize winning theoretical physicist. Weinberg said "Religion is an insult to human dignity. Without it, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. For good people to do bad things it takes religion
@jostnamane3951 Місяць тому
Quoting a famous personality doesn't prove anything. What is "good"? and what is "bad"? There's only "what is" on a purely nihilistic worldview because you cannot derive normativity from the fact that the world IS a certain way. Look up David Hume's 'IS-OUGHT' problem
@rabinderkoul1577 Місяць тому
@Paran953 Openheimer also quoted from Bhagvad Geeta and Erwin Shrodinger from Upanishads. Openheimer talked referred to Christianity and Judaism as those were the religions he was familiar with. How does that give you the license to quote him when you do not know that in what context he said it. You may want to impress the public by giving his name, but tell me what was his contribution to Physics?
@param953 Місяць тому
@@rabinderkoul1577 r there any agencies to give me license what to quote ?
@jostnamane3951 Місяць тому
@@param953 what is "good" and what is "bad"?
@N9745H8 Місяць тому
@@jostnamane3951 The Noble Quran Surah Al-Baqarah 2:177 It is not Al-Birr (piety, righteousness, and each and every act of obedience to Allah, etc.) that you turn your faces towards east and (or) west (in prayers); but Al-Birr is (the quality of) the one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the Angels, the Book, the Prophets and gives his wealth, in spite of love for it, to the kinsfolk, to the orphans, and to Al-Masakin (the poor), and to the wayfarer, and to those who ask, and to set slaves free, performs As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and gives the Zakat, and who fulfill their covenant when they make it, and who are As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.) in extreme poverty and ailment (disease) and at the time of fighting (during the battles). Such are the people of the truth and they are Al-Muttaqun (pious) This is definition of righteousness by Quran
@pavitraaprashant2175 2 місяці тому
Basically Javed is saying that hindus should tolerate the abuses and also wants hindus to ask muslims to become like them all expectations from hindus but he has no.guts to ask muslims that why they can't tolerate Taslima and Salman rushdie😊
@Human-xz2gr 2 місяці тому
Javed is ashamed of his religion. But he has a big ego to accept that Dharma is much superior concept than majhab.
@user-wb8vl8li8z Місяць тому
A section of hindus are intolerant at this point of time
@curious_one1156 Місяць тому
He did not say that. Once.
@murn3229 Місяць тому
basically you're stupid.
@pavitraaprashant2175 Місяць тому
@Human-xz2gr That's the hypocracy and in urdu it's munafiqat which is taught them in their mazaa hub
@sohampatel-bm7gt 2 місяці тому
The baisness of the host is quite evident. Makarand point was cut cleverly at various intervals. He is making very correct point.
@rayzimmerman6740 2 місяці тому
baisness.???...very cooect point??? get an education to start - then opine.
@Human-xz2gr 2 місяці тому
@@rayzimmerman6740 Javed Akhtar has very shallow knowledge and he talks nonsence. India was already rich before the Islamic invaders came. In fact only because of its wealth the invaders wanted to be here and plunder it.
@anandanmathivanan4712 2 місяці тому
Cut has been inflicted in Makarands speech because he is trying to propogate one religion.
@sainikpraveen 2 місяці тому
@@anandanmathivanan4712not all religions are same. Islam is an expansionary religion with force and hiduism is not. So clearly one is better than the other. When speaking on these facts, people want to get offended and not allow one to speak. What good is this debate then? You will only allow to speak those who agree with your view? Is that the intolerance you are imbibing from Islam?
@Insaniyat980 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar is ashamed of his religion and other abrahmic religions because they are based on dogmas and want their followers to blindly believe in their illogical theories and doctrines. So he calls himself an Atheist. But t at the same time he is egoistic and doesn't want to understand the beauty of Sanatan Dharm which implores a human to be a seeker, and promotes to seek truth with its philosophical logical knowledge. In Sanatan dharm karma is main thing which a human should perform. Javed Akhtar is either foolish not to understand the difference between religion (majhab) and Dharm or he is cunning enough to obfuscate peoples mind by bundling both as same.
@angshumanpodder4415 27 днів тому
Logic and faith can coexist. Consider the great Ramunajam for example. Unfortunately, that has not been perpetuated as we have a singular view of which should be more powerful. We should all remember: Logic appeals to the cognitive mind, faith appeals to the emotional mind.
@chamansingh3657 Місяць тому
He has not replied about dalit issues.
@Theshowstopper2010 2 місяці тому
Its unfortunate that Makrand was discussing with jawed who was not ready to hear... and it was cut in between...unfortunate
@Human-xz2gr 2 місяці тому
Makrand is an intellectual and knowledgeable person. Javed is a buffoon he has very shallow knowledge.
@cheltooktribefreethinker1028 2 місяці тому
i think makrand told to much than javad. Idk how u judges the converstions 😊. Javad sir rocks when it comes to logic and rationality
@Ritesh-rj1sp Місяць тому
Javed is burnt because he can't embarrass Hindus like before He used to embarrass them in sholay And enjoy But he didn't know there was no social media then Now Hindus will expose his cunningness
@cheltooktribefreethinker1028 Місяць тому
@@Ritesh-rj1sp javad sir is the voice for voiceless ppl. Rss and isis can't stop him from speaking truth. Ya modi will wil be exposed daily. Be pity sure on it
@arpitagarwal4924 Місяць тому
To be real Hindu is to first take a deep dive into yourself and leave behind all the materialistic world, which people have forgotten and have become prey to the filthy politics
@oneanuj 2 місяці тому
At start Jawed Saab said there is no difference in religions, but at around 30 minutes. He says Hindus had elbow space that is being taken away and he tells Hindus to be not like others. This is a point to be delved into.
@dr-sg8xo 2 місяці тому
Thts because the other guy defended hinduism. He started by saying he denounced islam too. So i think ur biased
@Human-xz2gr 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar has very shallow knowledge and he talks nonsence. India was already rich before the Islamic invaders came. In fact only because of its wealth the invaders wanted to be here and plunder it.
@Nietzsche_K_Gote 2 місяці тому
@@Human-xz2gr cute IT cell very cute
@Insaniyat980 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar is ashamed of his religion and other abrahmic religions because they are based on dogmas and want their followers to blindly believe in their illogical theories and doctrines. So he calls himself an Atheist. But t at the same time he is egoistic and doesn't want to understand the beauty of Sanatan Dharm which implores a human to be a seeker, and promotes to seek truth with its philosophical logical knowledge. In Sanatan dharm karma is main thing which a human should perform. Javed Akhtar is either foolish not to understand the difference between religion (majhab) and Dharm or he is cunning enough to obfuscate peoples mind by bundling both as same.
@SkyMonkeyLing 2 місяці тому
When Lindus can't Defend their Hinduism ! Then divert debate towards abrahamic religions 😂 Oldest Kulture strategy 😂
@RationalPlanet-ju8rr Місяць тому
Full support Javed sir❤😊
@shobhitsaxena948 Місяць тому
It was a very healthy and enlightening discussion. A wise person is one who takes valuable ideas from both the speakers without being biased.
@rabinderkoul1577 Місяць тому
To be wise and find wisdom, one needs to be at least educated. Javed is not and you indicate that you are neither.
@shobhitsaxena948 Місяць тому
@@rabinderkoul1577 I don't understand what made you feel like I'm not educated. I'm an MBBS graduate and a practicing medical officer. Even if you don't fully agree with someone, they can teach you valuable things.
@deepsareen1 Місяць тому
@@rabinderkoul1577 To say what you said; without knowing a person, is surely lack of education.
@rabinderkoul1577 Місяць тому
@@deepsareen1 One does not have to know a person completely. The Comments on the public forum on specific topic exposes the person about how educated, a person is ona specific issue. If you cannot figure this much, I pity the Schools and teachers who educated you.
@abhisheksrivastava5633 2 місяці тому
I've never read Manusmriti but there are certainly objectional quotes in it that have been pointed out by many scholars. But that's the catch. I've never read Manusmriti despite being born in a Hindu family. I've never been asked to, infact nobody from my family has ever read it. Neither do we have Ramayan or Mahabharat at my home and never have I been asked to read them (However I'm interested). But this is not the case with other religions. You have to read the text, you can not condemn those books or the saying of those books. The people following those books believe all verses to be the true word of God and refuse to accept that it could have been polluted over a thousand years.
@N9745H8 Місяць тому
But that's not the case with Quran,today most of muslim ummah are following islam the same way as it was 1400 years ago, wordings of adhaan and namaz are same as it was 1400 years ago,Quran is not only the book of prayers,Quran encompass spiritual as well as material level of human life,eg Allah says read salaah and give zakah,means Allah orders us to do namaz and give charity,then Allah forbids interest on debt (ch 2 v 278-279 of Quran)and today we are witnessing the violation of this verse,almost all are under debts,and rich is getting richer and poor is getting poorer
@RohitKumar-vd3wc Місяць тому
Please do some research there are different versions of quran. Though one version is the most popular in the world.
@rabinderkoul1577 Місяць тому
(1) If you have not read Manusmriti, how do you know what is in it and what is not in it. (2) Is manusmritti Governing our Laws. But Muslim Personal law (Sharia) is implimented. Basically you admitted that you are ignorant of the Manusmritti but you have heard a about it many times, so it is authentic. Wow you are such a scholar.
@suchitabhat5051 Місяць тому
Yes, manusmriti is oppressive. But as is the way with sanatan, every thought, theories, ideologies were permissible. Let people decide what they identify with. For example; Rishi Charvak was a capitalist and Rishi Ashtavakra was an atheist. Yet their scriptures, theories are part of Ved. Sanatan Dharm is very inclusive in nature. 😊
@Muhammadkaif-jl8eb Місяць тому
There is only one version of Qur'an@@RohitKumar-vd3wc
@Sundip.sharma.11 2 місяці тому
Visibly javed was uneasy and unable to hide his hatred while anchor shoma was busy defending javed or toeing his line all along. Makrand coolly destroyed their plans to corner him.
@curious_one1156 Місяць тому
So you are still religious ! Yay ! Makarand won ! How could he have even lost ?
@yeppie295 Місяць тому
Marakand is doing a Hindu vs Muslim thing only. "My religion is better than your religion" was the thesis of Marakand, low-mind. He deserve a molvi, as he is a Pandith himself, lol . Javed is no match.
@mudassardesignspace Місяць тому
Javed akhtar interview checklist points and ready reckoner... 1) faith and belief - example of north pole..conclude faith to stupidity 2) god doesnt stop all evils of society although He has all power 3) 2 peg par religion rukta nahi..sar char jaata hai 4) religion is opium of public..God is a santa claus of adults 5) Akbar se bada great and forward thinker is desh me paida hi nahi hua. 6) India's rich GDP during time of Akbar, Jahangir and Shahjahan. Quote Thomas Row during the time of Jahangir 7) as long as i am abused by both sides, i am happy.. problem will be if i get abused from only one side 8) praising India's democracy and concluding which you will not find till you reach the Mediterranean coast 9) dad whispers communist manifesto in his ears when javed akhtar was born.. foundations of rationality and atheism 10) example of Galileo..earth is round..etc 11) aap athiest ho kar bhi communal ho sakte ho...quotes Jinah, Savarkar.. 12) there is nothing like blind faith..faith ka matalab hi hai blind 13) on being asked why are you Atheist? Because I think... 14) satiring that Eid par mujhe 200 mubarak baad aa jaate hain ..yet he likes to celebrate it and all festivals..hamein hamare tyohar and culture wapas de do...
@sandeeprevankar2252 Місяць тому
engaging discussion ....what i can gather after listening is our founding fathers knew all this too well and crafted a constitution which can be a real guiding principle ....
@bskeshav 2 місяці тому
Why is Javed Akhtar addressed as "Javed Sahab"? At the same time, you address Makarand Paranjape as just "Makarand" Why this distinction???
@satyapraveenmareddla9357 2 місяці тому
Age
@darklight898 2 місяці тому
Javed g is seniir citizen and a respectible writer ..
@chandra_yaan 2 місяці тому
Because this was cheating done across show so as loser Javed will be seen as a winner... All leftist cry baby incompetent comperer also loser
@bharatvedprakash1308 2 місяці тому
Mu$lim privilege
@sarthakvohra1632 2 місяці тому
lol Makarand Paranjpe is also a senior citizen and for you nachne vaala Javed must be more respected but for people who have brains they respect prof Paranjape more
@srinivasagv6372 2 місяці тому
Javed should write a scene on his own religion like he did in Sholay
@shrikantdange6927 2 місяці тому
He will not dare because money matters
@chinfilms2249 2 місяці тому
You guys missed the whole point. Even after it was so evident.
@soulsangat3350 2 місяці тому
He told islam is intolerant... Hindus mustn't be like Muslim.
@satejpatil875 2 місяці тому
You didn't understand. He said it clearly that he doesn't do so cuz he as everybody knows Islam would not accept it and all the while also accepted that Hindus are to be respected in that aspect because they are open to it. Actually even Makarand said it in his own words, if you try to reduce Hinduism to Just another dogmatic religion when it is a loss. And you my brother are trying to do the same.
@nadeemjsr2958 2 місяці тому
U r suffering from disease called faith and fascism.
@flywithfiroj Місяць тому
Hats off to Javed Akhtar for such a empirical rotational analysis in-spite of knowing it’s unpopular.
@murthybhagavatula3892 Місяць тому
Prof. Makarand Parnjape is on the Dot!
@VivekD-td5xc 2 місяці тому
Makrand, you shouldn’t be debating with people who do not share the same level of learning and understanding as yourself. Javed himself said at the beginning, albeit deprecatingly, that he did not understand 75% of what you said. But then this is so true even when you take away the sarcasm from his statement. While concluding too, he said that you were speaking to the wrong person. That’s again so true, though not in the sense Javed imagines.
@knightspygaming1287 12 днів тому
Bcoz spiritual/DHARMA/Religion are semantics theists making or trying to derive something more than thier religion to fool ppls through concepts like Dharma and spirituals
@indermohansinghmalhotra3730 2 місяці тому
It was a marvelous public discussion between a highly trained intellectual & a natural one with intrinsic intellect & many gifts. "Thank you", to the chanel, the hosts, the debaters & to the brilliant, extraordinary anchor! 🙏😊 My question: why is the program truncated midway 🤷? Why hasn't it been allowed to conclude in a civilized way?
@jhunuj6243 2 місяці тому
What was so marvelous. J behaved as illiterate
@ChildFirst 2 місяці тому
Javed lacks Knowledge of History and So about Spirituality within Dharma, also... He is somewhat toxicological. Moderator is partial towards Makrand and diplomatically manipulative, Moderator are not to give his/her view by interrupting in between. Makrand is a professor whereas Javed is not a researcher and if a person is Communist/Leftist/Atheist can never pick books to read & learn about Dharma within indic religion and for the sake Chinese Philosopher/Dhamra as well. Javed is also using his age to manipulate the debate and reactive with rage/anger.
@TheAaryanQ 2 місяці тому
i was there and it's supposed to be a 50 min session it was a part of IFP and upcoming sessions and guests were lined up, maybe eth host could have been more strict with javed but ofcourse when such a big perosnity involved you kind of want to give em a few mins leeway for power diffference, i remember javed juvenielly threatening that he come to this annual festival again next year if he isnt given last word despite him being given ample time, this was not the sole even and this is when a thinker develops rationalist enough ego to touch on narcisism, i am saying all this despite bieng a fan of javed and an agnostic myself
@Human-xz2gr 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar has very shallow knowledge and he talks nonsence. India was already rich before the Islamic invaders came. In fact only because of its wealth the invaders wanted to be here and plunder it.
@Insaniyat980 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar is ashamed of his religion and other abrahmic religions because they are based on dogmas and want their followers to blindly believe in their illogical theories and doctrines. So he calls himself an Atheist. But t at the same time he is egoistic and doesn't want to understand the beauty of Sanatan Dharm which implores a human to be a seeker, and promotes to seek truth with its philosophical logical knowledge. In Sanatan dharm karma is main thing which a human should perform. Javed Akhtar is either foolish not to understand the difference between religion (majhab) and Dharm or he is cunning enough to obfuscate peoples mind by bundling both as same.
@rakeshkamti4486 Місяць тому
No religion no war
@shivanshkhare5943 13 днів тому
Most idiotic thing I heard. If there is no religion, no one fears doing bad to others. World will become much more hellish than it is now.
@geonsorigin2108 Місяць тому
We don't need religion but we do need Dharma.
@youthwave 2 місяці тому
Prof. Makarand's points are highly rational. A healthy discussion enriches mind.
@AmarkantVishwakarma 2 місяці тому
Do you believe in casteism? Do you support intercaste marriage?
@youthwave 2 місяці тому
@@AmarkantVishwakarma Yes. Individual is more important than invisible caste tag.
@youthwave 2 місяці тому
@@AmarkantVishwakarma No.
@SkyMonkeyLing 2 місяці тому
@@AmarkantVishwakarmathey won't do intercaste marriage 😂😂
@shanblues7257 Місяць тому
I would like to know how does a carpet have consciousness. Secondly, does Hinduism not believe in one or multiple Gods who are very powerful and very nice beings? So, doesn't that make it alike other religions as to the presence of a God and since Javed considers it irrational, it does make Hinduism irrational too, isn't it? Third, Manu Smriti has beautiful verses. But so do Quran and Bible. But does it negate the presence of bad verses?
@rohitbiswal 2 місяці тому
Javed didn't mention the killing and atrocities to Hindu by Mougal .
@teakadai43 2 місяці тому
Like Upper caste Hindus doing over thousands of year to Dalits.
@ujjwalyadav3783 2 місяці тому
@@teakadai43no proof of that
@teakadai43 2 місяці тому
@@ujjwalyadav3783 In Mahabharata, Eklavya was more Talented than Arjuns. But Still he was not Considered as Equal to Arjuna Only because of he was Lower Caste. This is Was just a Example from Yours Books. Even Now Dalits cannot Enter Temple.
@ujjwalyadav3783 2 місяці тому
@@teakadai43 in mahabharat eklavya was the son of commander in chief of the army of magadh- the most powerful army. 😭
@teakadai43 2 місяці тому
@@ujjwalyadav3783 he was belongs to a Lower Caste.
@quenchurthirst7857 Місяць тому
नासमझ लड़ते हैं ...समझदार बेवजह लड़ते हैं...दिमाग होने का भरम हो जिनको हर बात पे लड़ते हैं...😂
@dipankarnag6596 2 місяці тому
lot of editing happened in the video. This is not correct I think. Lot of points from both especially Javed saab may be missed.
@bluesparrow10 2 місяці тому
Moderator already gave her judgement by calling javed as rational😂😂😂
@pankajsen132 2 місяці тому
Religion has now became a belief system when viewed through Abhrahmic lens. The Indian understanding is very different. Javed Akhtar is a convenient atheist. His movies are there to see. He talks about Akbar only because he is Muslim and not because he studied what Akbar did. That’s why Bollywood writers glorified invaders.
@venkataramanakotamraju9414 2 місяці тому
They glorified invaders because 1. They always considered the invaders as their ancestors. 2. They Got lots of money from the invaders class like Dawood and other intellectuals of same class inside and outside the country.
@subhajitroy3644 2 місяці тому
Akbar never declared himself as a Muslim. Rather he was despised by Islam as a heretic. He founded and propagated a new religious faith named Din-i-Ilahi.
@ChandanKumar-dw8kc 2 місяці тому
@@venkataramanakotamraju94143. Petro-dollar
@venkataramanakotamraju9414 2 місяці тому
@@subhajitroy3644 doesn't matter what he called himself. He cause untold misery to Hindus. Johar happened because of him. 30000 civilians were slaughtered in one attack by him and his cruel army. He was also illiterate that he could not even read or write. What cult he has started is his own problem. Doesn't make a big difference especially when coming from a rakshas like him.
@jostnamane3951 2 місяці тому
Any worldview is a belief system. That's not an argument. What is the Indian understanding you tell us? India is a land where different theological foundations with often contradictory narratives flourished alongside. Among one of those who rejected the Vedic infallibility in their times [The Nastikas] were indeed heretics. But the same heretics today are revered by many Astikas of India. You ask the question, why? Why revere the people who rejected the signs of the unseen? Is there no universal understanding of Indian philosophy? Or there's no Indian understanding to begin with and it's just an umbrella term for a set of distinct theological foundations with often contradictory narratives.
@sunitboden6339 Місяць тому
Javed u r best!!
@KheraShanu 9 днів тому
perfect mediator and perfect debaters! loved it!
@ivorodrigues1976 2 місяці тому
Magnificent debate. This is what India is all about. Coming together of perspective 's. Wonderful.
@RojaJaneman 2 місяці тому
Wow 🤦♀️
@Insaniyat980 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar is ashamed of his religion and other abrahmic religions because they are based on dogmas and want their followers to blindly believe in their illogical theories and doctrines. So he calls himself an Atheist. But t at the same time he is egoistic and doesn't want to understand the beauty of Sanatan Dharm which implores a human to be a seeker, and promotes to seek truth with its philosophical logical knowledge. In Sanatan dharm karma is main thing which a human should perform. Javed Akhtar is either foolish not to understand the difference between religion (majhab) and Dharm or he is cunning enough to obfuscate peoples mind by bundling both as same.
@ivorodrigues1976 2 місяці тому
@@Insaniyat980 Religion is a very personal matter dear. They are just debating their personal views. In the end to each their own. What is important is that we allow each other the space to grow through our own experiences. This is the essence of mostly every other religion.What do you think ?
@mamtajha3147 2 місяці тому
Javedjee your tone itself & label yourself as rational, shows you believe yourself to be superior
@veganuma Місяць тому
Love for Javed Sir. Salute to you for your rational😊 thoughts
@devbhoomi776 Місяць тому
Markand ji Pranam. Very clear thoughts about our society. We have pluralism and everyone has their Kuldevta and Istadevta and it doesn't mean we worship them blindly. It means there is something about their personality that we admire/epitomise and revere. Believe in whatever you want or don't believe in anything. Honestly as a practicing Hindu, we don't care if there is a religion or no religion for all we care, as long as they are governed by aCommon law on what are Do's and Dont's in the land and it should be followed by all with NO exceptions... which is again nothing but Dharma. Lets accept that there are good and bad in every community. And it is the duty of civilised and civic community to mentor their community reward them for good and punish / condemn them for anything wrong. Don't come on streets and justify the wrong things done by your community, by playing the minority victim card. The tragedy of Hindu community is they have been taught to tolerate everything even rapes and murders. And Islamists are being empowered to show aggression for everything, My way or High way. Thus far and NO further.
@drvivekjalali3397 2 місяці тому
Kindly publish the whole video, it is much edited, incomplete and inconclusive. 🤷🏼♂️
@ANILKUMAR-tw5xe 2 місяці тому
It is the responsility of people like Javed Akhtar to preach tolarence and inclusiveness to the followers of his religion and also followers of his atheism.
@m.ishakziaee9861 2 місяці тому
Abay ghanchakkar! He left his birth religion ling time ago, abhi tak nai samjha??!
@jostnamane3951 2 місяці тому
How can you derive "tolerance" from an arbitrary starting point if there's only "what is"?
@auhmav04 2 місяці тому
didnt javed indicate he's an atheist? im pretty sure he's atheist
@shanblues7257 Місяць тому
His religion and his atheism? Bro, you confused or what?
@bjbharath Місяць тому
His religion and atheists is itself an oxymoron which morons dont get it. Atheists dont care about any religion nor incite violence in the name of god or religion so its the responsibility of religious people to maintain peace since they are the ones who take offence to their gods and religion and incite violence.
@anowmel Місяць тому
Very insightful conversation..... Both are knowledgeable 🤌🏼🙏🏼
@smiklkhan8162 Місяць тому
When you have chosen such an intense topic with thinking beautiful minds, one thing you should have assured that their voice reaches us !!!
@DharmendraRaiMindMap 2 місяці тому
Rationality offers a serenity most humans never experience
@NaRc0s_G 2 місяці тому
You can be a Rationalist and still believe there is a Creator and Pray to it for whatever reason. They are not necessarily mutually exclusive. In fact, stating out right there can't be a creator, (it can be a he or she or even a it) is actually Irrational. Don't you think ?
@DharmendraRaiMindMap 2 місяці тому
@@NaRc0s_G it is rational to believe there may be a creator and proof would be welcome
@DharmendraRaiMindMap 2 місяці тому
@@NaRc0s_Gstating there can't be a creator is an irrational statement
@NaRc0s_G 2 місяці тому
@@DharmendraRaiMindMap "stating there can't be a creator is an irrational statement". Yes that's what I am saying, These dumbos who call themselves as "Atheists" are not actually Atheists, they are anti-theist. If someone wants to be to Scientifically correct/ rational, they should instead say, they don't even know if they is a God or Not, they can never know. There is word for it, it's called being Agnostic. And when it comes to topic like, Existence of God/creator of this Universe, these so called Atheist are as dumb as people who say God exists. That's what the other speaker what was trying to say, unlike other religion, Hinduism is not actually a religion, it's a collection of philosophies to lead your life. You may either believe in God, you may not, both are welcomed in Hinduism. There isn't one book you have to follow, there are many, just discard the bad things and all you are left with is philosophies which will help you better your life. That's what Hinduism is all about. There are philosophies, just select what you like, discard everything else. There is no blasphemy, because Hinduism is not even a religion in the first place. Would love to know, where you beg to differ ?
@ashwinkhambadkone394 2 місяці тому
Look at the pseudo rational Akhtar foaming in his mouth
@mrinmoy187 2 місяці тому
Wow!! Javed sir 🔥🔥
@Mahendra-my3us Місяць тому
200%agreed with Javed Saheb
@mrbeyonder6081 Місяць тому
400% agreed with Markarand
@khajazakirhussain9611 25 днів тому
Facts about religion: Do good be away from bad deeds. There is life after death good ones are awarded and bad ones are punished. Recognise creator of this beautiful universe and worship creator alone. Be loving with all human beings irrespective of colours,caste etc.
@drindrajeetasija5218 2 місяці тому
Why does the moderater address Javed with prefix Saab while she calls Prof Makrand only as Makrand
@tinguzz 2 місяці тому
Javed is Sabah . . . originated from Family of Prophet.
@beenasingh3316 2 місяці тому
❤valid observation
@robin4singh 2 місяці тому
@@tinguzzprophet is mythology, never excited beyond stories, no parallel reference or proofs are found anywhere.
@anilkaralamangala1431 2 місяці тому
The Hindu or the Sanatanis are the only courteous people, they don’t care what they are addressed as, just listen to the cheering of Javed when he says he doesn’t believe in any religion. The audience may be the picked seculars.
@rajnikant1948 2 місяці тому
Anchor addressing Javed as Sahab and Profeesor with no similar respectful word is because of legacy of slave mentality of Hndus ruled over and enslaved for 800 yrs by foreign Moghul and British invaders.😂
@introvert_2023 2 місяці тому
35:04 He accepted the Distinction that Hinduism is much more plural and progressive than monotheistic religions like Islam/Christianity.
@JoJo-hj4tx Місяць тому
That right wing professor couldn't understand javed sahab point that all religions are the same because as you can see any country doesn't matter from which religion they have following but whenever they choose religion instead of secularism they have totally been vanished like iraq iran Afghanistan pakistan Even if you go to india before democracy then you can easily find out beautiful sati pratha breast tax child marriages devadasi niyog etc etc even you can compare current india from 20 years old India then 20 years old india was much progressive than the current india just because of religious politics As he said there was not any words like dalit but the question is why were the aystem of upper & lower caste this is how religion evolved & extremism born for ex islam came from saudi arabia but if you see the saudi islam then you can find out shia & sunni islam but when that islam evolved in india then ahmadia islam happened even there are majority of muslims who óppose ahmadia as a muslim but the point is this is how religion evolved just like a cancer if it happened in your body then it can be grown up
@Ritesh-rj1sp Місяць тому
Yes he accepted because he want to embarrass Hindus again and again like he did in sholay
@jostnamane3951 Місяць тому
But that is a normative statement. You cannot derive "progressivism" from the fact that the world IS a certain way. Therefore a religion being progressive or regressive is completely arbitrary. Social norms or prevailing culture isn't what we are supposed to use to define whether something should be considered progressive or regressive. He already lost the plot if he used normative statements to try to prove which religion is better.
@nitingawai5662 Місяць тому
Great Javed Sahab...
@sivaajaykumarveeranki1305 Місяць тому
The discussion is out of the topic mentioned but i always enjoy when javed sab is vocal
@rahulkadle8240 2 місяці тому
Burnol moment for Javed. Lol quite typical of his ilk. Paranjape was brilliant and kept his cool.
@lakshmisrinivas9454 2 місяці тому
Totally agree 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@sarveshsingh8050 2 місяці тому
Bholi bhakti
@merebaap8370 2 місяці тому
If you could understand what he meant then you should be called Vishwaguru.😂😂😂😂😂
@ayush6sept09 2 місяці тому
Pseudo secularist
@logical.Indian 2 місяці тому
We want full video it’s a shame that you didn’t put a full video put the full video on Man. We want to see the whole fight. It was interesting to see somebody who is making his point
@ksuri989 Місяць тому
Makrand Sahib Very very confident Sanatan Dharma has not been understood and explained properly by anyone in recent times say hundred years That is why religions have formed Sanatan Dharama is a philosophy of evolution not a religion We appreciate effort on the part of trio
@user-kr5xw8cb1r Місяць тому
Very interesting. Clear and concise views.
@riser9644 2 місяці тому
Need full video
@KaithHanda 5 днів тому
Good job IFP. It was worthing to spend 45 minutes. Keep uploading for the enlightenment.
@njeyasreedharan 13 днів тому
Makarand really speaks the hidden truth. Unfortunately not many will listen with an open mind. Even open minds may not fully understand due to no fault of their own.
@singhkaushlendra9 2 місяці тому
Beautifully debated by Dr Makarand paranjpe sir. I respect Javed sahab but he is really unaware of many historical facts about mughal. He himself said don't become others. What remains to debate after that.
@abhishek-kumar100 2 місяці тому
Makarand, you were fabulous!!
@Dhanan-J 2 місяці тому
how ?
@amitkolhe4155 2 місяці тому
Makrand was highly stupid and lousy. Felt like listening to some aboriginee blabbering after getting high on Marijuana. How did this guy become a professor? Such low quality arguments and no intelligence !
@faruqsha6456 Місяць тому
He himself don't know😂@@Dhanan-J
@ravimahara4741 Місяць тому
Paranjape Sir always shines bright amidst the ocean of mediocrity and Hypocrisy
@AbhishekRaj.07 Місяць тому
Makarand rocks . People in comments didn't understood him .
@aasifali9139 2 місяці тому
There are cuts in this video, plzz upload the uncut video. btw great talk.
@SkyMonkeyLing 2 місяці тому
When Lindus can't Defend their Hinduism ! Then divert debate towards abrahamic religions 😂 Oldest Kulture strategy 😂🤡🚩
@nabajyotipaul7635 Місяць тому
Very good now get out of my country@@SkyMonkeyLing
@wutangmuslin Місяць тому
@@SkyMonkeyLing stop with these inciting comments. Don't promote hate speech.
@SkyMonkeyLing Місяць тому
@@wutangmuslin why they play Whatabouttry ?
@spuriusscapula4829 29 днів тому
@@SkyMonkeyLing dude I'm an atheist, and I criticize Hinduism. But looking at your profile, I seriously doubt that you're one... the odds point to you being a Muslim. And the irony of you people using vile words like "pajeet", when that word very well could be used for you.
@surajk7295 2 місяці тому
Paranjape good sir Spoke with clarity but slight correction on hindutva as it means knowing essence of sanatana dharma in depth which Hindu was disconnected from long as text book not taught and nor parents🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@aishimondal8101 Місяць тому
Pls upload the full uncut unedited version ,,, pls exercise 'the right to be informed ' in its entirety
@deepanshsinghsolanki2516 Місяць тому
Really great lessons!
@sreematbhiksu4536 2 місяці тому
Loving kindness, compassion, appreciative joy and forgiveness these four human qualities are real Dharma and religion.
@mailsuyal 2 місяці тому
can Jawed Taqiya man condame Quran?
@knightspygaming1287 2 місяці тому
He does
@vimp6260 2 місяці тому
Learn to spell unpad
@jostnamane3951 2 місяці тому
Fix your "Inglis" first. Taqiyya is done when a believer feels threatened by non-believers. For example, when a believer is forced to renounce his faith at the expense of his life or his family or co-religionist's life, he can do taqiyya. Javed Akhtar did condemn the Qur'an on many occasions for what he considers as "problematic" even though there's only "what is" on his worldview.
@varghesechacko6811 Місяць тому
Javed is eye opener to the world.Manipulation in religion is very subtle.For eg I am supposed to say jai ram ji ki as greeting to all Indians even if they not hindus.Then I have the right to say to say jai shaitaan ji ki or jai ravan ki in response.And nobody should feel bad ! 😅
@abhishekbanerjii 2 місяці тому
As anchors can you keep a bit quiet and let the SPEAKERS talk. Thats why they are invited
@curious_one1156 Місяць тому
Moderators are meant to stop them when they are breaking decorum.
@citybird29 Місяць тому
This is a debate between a man and a brainwashed man. Javed is using his mind to form his opinion while Makarand like all religious people uses opinions read from religious books . Which is exactly the difference between a thinker and an educated person .
@abdulazizkhan1353 Місяць тому
Bro do u knows conditioning?A Person conditioned by society. Ur statement is wrong
@48038 20 днів тому
आप कहना चाहते है कि सरल सहज मितभाषी उदार समतावादी संयम संतोष मनोवृत्ति वाले लोग सांसारिक धार्मिक छल कपट हिंसा प्रति हिंसा आधिपत्य मानसिकता से उदासीन रहने वाले लोग कमजोर और मूर्ख होते है...!!
@RakeshGhangas 2 місяці тому
Kudos to Javed Sahab 👏👏👏👏👏
@mitrasaxena437 2 місяці тому
Hats off to Javed Sahab...for a branded Muslim to call out negatives is much more courageous...while Makarand sidelined the practice of A caste based Hindu society ...in all the thousands of years ...between the Vedic times and ....after
@ibrahimabdullah6886 2 місяці тому
Well said
@Insaniyat980 2 місяці тому
Javed Akhtar is ashamed of his religion and other abrahmic religions because they are based on dogmas and want their followers to blindly believe in their illogical theories and doctrines. So he calls himself an Atheist. But t at the same time he is egoistic and doesn't want to understand the beauty of Sanatan Dharm which implores a human to be a seeker, and promotes to seek truth with its philosophical logical knowledge. In Sanatan dharm karma is main thing which a human should perform. Javed Akhtar is either foolish not to understand the difference between religion (majhab) and Dharm or he is cunning enough to obfuscate peoples mind by bundling both as same.
@arvindmishra9840 Місяць тому
Are you a Hindu Mitra ji?
@user-gd4wt6oi7y 23 дні тому
Aesthetic sensibilities in art architecture is a totally different matter in conversing heritages, and it shows that what kind of human minds existed steeped in crafts skills no more today.
@aman.2004 29 днів тому
Great👑 Javed Shahab 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@rmt1508 2 місяці тому
Well done Prof Makrand you have exposed both in front of you.it will be excellent if we could watch the uncut portion also..👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏
@satejpatil875 2 місяці тому
Why the break at 09:34?
@satejpatil875 2 місяці тому
And many such breaks in Makarand sir's dialogue... Why so?
@Kalki2898_ad Місяць тому
Editor is leftists 😁
@deepakgautam2910 18 днів тому
Mr javed is 100% right 👍🏿 I also felt the same, I'm struggling to find some validation for a long long time but now There's a Man Who exactly thinks like me 🙏🏿🙌🏿
@Akashkumar-ev8mj 4 дні тому
We want Javed sir Discussion with Acharya Prashant.
@satyanarayang6589 2 місяці тому
Paranjape, all the way!❤
@curious_one1156 Місяць тому
Javed wanted to empower you. But you are already a slave.
@Anjan-1959 Місяць тому
Excellent Prof. Marakand Paranjape!
@Jai_Gauranga_RadhaShyamsundar 5 днів тому
The world doesn't need religion but it needs poetry and bollywood. Interesting!
@snehashispanda4808 12 днів тому
Dear Javed sir, Caste discrimination is rooted not in religion but culture. Caste was an ancient system of occupational class delineated in Hindu texts that over the years developed into a rigid social hierarchy. The lowest castes, or untouchables, were marginalized and faced persecution. Caste-based discrimination is not intrinsic to Hinduism and should not be thought of as religiously sanctioned. the poorer workers involved in 'unclean' occupations such as sweeping or leather work were historically segregated and banished outside the city limits. Over time, personal cleanliness came to be identified with "purity", and the concept of untouchability eventually spread to the rural areas. Manusmriti text was never implemented as a law code in ancient India. The caste system as it exists today is the result of developments during the rise of the British colonial government in India. The British Raj furthered this development, making rigid caste organisation a central mechanism of administration. By 1860 the British formulated the caste system into their system of governance, granting administrative jobs and senior appointments only to Christians and people belonging to certain castes.
Algebra Conversations
Переглядів 1 млн
Mojo Story
Переглядів 62 тис.
5 канал
Переглядів 892 тис.
Алексей Навальный
Переглядів 5 млн
Dhruv Rathee
Переглядів 6 млн
Mojo Story
Переглядів 78 тис.
Aaj Tak
Переглядів 4,8 млн
WildFilmsIndia
Переглядів 678 тис.
Kunal Kamra
Переглядів 1,5 млн
Polinka_girla (Полинка и Оператор)
Переглядів 2,6 млн