We love to science forever ❤️

👍🏻

Watch this then you'll know Neil is lying ukposts.info/have/v-deo/j3GWdoaqoqyBlY0.html

The wealth of knowledge preset on this channel alone, entirely for free, is hard to describe.

❤️❤️❤️

Chuck’s journey is great to watch.

But has he tried dmt?

@@alexkang7360 , he seems to already be an enlightened dude. But look what it did to Mike Tyson.

His new name, Osmosis Chuck...

Hey Neil - still living in denial of the UFO evidence from the US military - a true scientist explores All the evidence

i was about to say it, but you have seem to beet me. . . in this multiverse

@@tomking2613 lol

@@spookyninja4098 The U means unidentified. So, a UFO doesn't imply aliens or spaceships. You need to get your head out of conspiracy cuckoo land.

@@StaticBlaster I guess you dont read the news buddy = The Pentagon confirms a video of a triangle UFO buzzing their destroyer is real - you were saying ? www.the-sun.com/news/2683726/us-navy-filmed-ufo-sky-video/

Just compliment each other? Just? 😂

Bromance is strong with these

As a left hand clasping a right hand, a real chiral pair.

Ditto. Their latest podcast was a party! Really amazing little gang, this two!

It's complement, of course, but we get the picture! ; )

Really wish they would've continued on to ask what if the Gravity Train was applicable to the moon and how long it would've taken.

Watch this then you'll know Neil is lying ukposts.info/have/v-deo/j3GWdoaqoqyBlY0.html

@cops and govern ment are gangstalkers By applying science that is very advanced and can't be comprehended easily, The answer to your latter question is doppler effect ! By studying the incoming light of astronomical you can figure out the distance between them

My old welding partner used to say he's getting on the gravy train before our shift. Never really got the reference

@@bens3509 Gravy train = easy street. Work = security. Something about a bird in the hand and some bush or something. Moral of the story, don't let go of the bird. So, long story short... If you got a job, embrace the benefits it provides.

@@Robert_McGarry_Poems awesome haha. Thank you for the insight!

Watch this then you'll know Neil is lying ukposts.info/have/v-deo/j3GWdoaqoqyBlY0.html

Lol I've been waiting for it too.

The gravity doesn't change as you get closer. Rather the amount of planet pulling you in the same direction changes. So as you approach the center, less planet is pulling you towards the center and more is pulling you away from it. As you move away from the center more of the planet is pulling you towards the center and less is pulling you away. The closer to the center you go the higher the pressure will be, and gravity would also increase if the planet was made denser.

Not only that, if you took Einstein’s equations and theory, how will spacetime curvature which is what gravity is, will be effected in a solid object like the earth?!

Einstein: Well actually nothing is pulling on anything. You see, objects can only ever move in a straight line. It is actually space that is curved. Space/time is a framework for thinking about how mass warps space, and how mass moves through that curved space. Think of a rocket ship......

@@Robert_McGarry_Poems exactly! What I’m wondering is how this space-time curve inside a planet? 🤔

He's accually half wrong on that part, and your teacher is half right. This would be the case if the earth had a perfectly uniform density, but it doesn't. The core is much denser than the earth's mantle so the force would increase at the start. It not until you get to about the core's surface it starts decreasing.

And, it was on a track. Problem is, the deeper you go, the more massive the earthquakes are, and the tunnels created would act as crumple zones.

my thoughts exactly :D total recall train is actually doable

@@witchdoctor6502 no cuz the inside of the earth is 6000 degrees so it will melt literally any material

It was called "The Fall"

@@witchdoctor6502 Well, it is 2021 and we have only dug a 7ish mile hole into the Earth, so only 7,993 miles to go and we'll have the first one....if earth was 8K miles in diameter

Yup!

Absolute Legends!

Except the earth (and thus the hole) continues rotating, so it would rotate with your lateral movement? No?

Can't argue against that. Going from equator to equator would possess the greatest angular momentum, thus scraping your skin off on the side until reaching the center. After you pass the center, you can apply ointment to the wounds. lol

@@Zone1BC the center rotation is faster, yes..?

If you went pole to pole would that be Magnetic pole to pole or Axis pole to pole..? Wouldn't the Moons gravitational pull bang you up anyway lol...

@@Zone1BC Absolutely, it does but by how much? Short answer: it's a normal to tangential axis coriolis effect application. In actual English: usually giving a rotation as an instantaneous velocity (eg 1000 mph at the equator) is a terrible idea but in this example it's actually helpful to keep things simple. So let's do that! Ok, you're on the equator doing 1000mph or thereabouts tangentially relative to the centre of the Earth in the direction of rotation at the precise moment you jump into the hole. The conservation of momentum / Newton's 1st means you retain your momentum. Only physics can have a law that says "do nothing, nothing happens" and see it as profound but there you go... We're ignoring friction here. Keep things simple. So, how fast are the walls moving? Let's take a point half way to the centre of the earth and so avoid calculus like the plague. That means the circle described at that point is smaller, the radius is smaller. But the rotational period is the same: 23 hrs 56 mins; one sidereal day* So, half way down the wall is taking the same time to cover less distance than you are from retaining your velocity. That means it's going tangentially slower than you. That means you smack your nose hard into the wall and scrape. :) The physics here is essentially the same as for why hurricanes rotate in different directions in the N and S hemispheres. As you move north from the equator, the radius reduces and so it's moving less distance but at the same period; 1 sidereal day. All we've done is shift axes. Hope that was mildly helpful. There's a little more to it than that but this is already long. *let me know if you'd like me to explain the 4 min difference to a solar day. Or try to work it out for yourself maybe. A little bit of thought and you can figure it out where the 4 mins went...

Interesting conundrum, but once you reach the center wouldn't you still have the second mass of the Earth pulling on you. Since we don't fully understand Gravity and its affect, but you make a great point...

Oh no, that sounds painful... 😖

@@Robert_McGarry_Poems XD

If I’m correct (and I could be wrong) you are already rotating with earth so you wouldn’t necessarily hit the “walls” of the hole because you’re rotating with it. But I’m no scientist so....

@@D__Cain true, but as you near center rotation speeds up like a ice skater brings their arms into their body while doing a spin. I think this qualifies as accept for a few details as Neil explained...

@@D__Cain only if you dig at the equator

Terminal velocity is a result of wind resistance. That's why they said "Not factoring wind resistance."

You would *_never_* reach the other side if there was normal (sea level) air density and thus resistance all the way with a 200 km/h (~120 mph) terminal velocity. You would reach 200 km/h shortly after you jumped into the tunnel on one side and stay close to that speed until you were about halfway to the Earth's centre. There the gravity would start decreasing and you would start slowing down due to the air resistance now being stronger than gravity. Air resistance would also decrease as you slowed down, but so would gravity until reaching zero at the Earth's centre. If you had any speed left when reaching the centre and thus overshot it slightly, you would be stopped and pulled back by the now reversed gravity, and you would end up floating at the centre for ever.

Let's just say.. You finally beat the equation, by being a supermen & say like, CHINA was the first men on earth, to win that G-train noble trophy! So, than finally, you think you got, all the equation finally counted through & taught that, I'm be like the first human to test that g-train & no equations is gonna stop you ( since you did all of it & was rest assured ) Once, you're the first men, to finally " 0ne giant's leap for Humankind " sort of Go Go Spirit & suddenly you're realized, that when there we're no equation holding you back, you are stucked in the middle of center earth Not just, one nights but more than a months.. and crap, there is still an equation that's not right & R.i.P theory my men!

You can make the analogy on falling through the atmosphere of Júpiter... "Gas planet"

Only if we neglect air resistance. Once we consider that as well your energy will dissipate and you end up oscillating with decreased amplitude

Same

Terminal velocity is a result of wind resistance. That's why they said "Not factoring wind resistance."

@@oxide9679 so in a vacuum there is no limit to the acceleration caused by gravity (besides the limit of impact)?

@@meizhongbai None that I'm aware of.

The time taken would depend on mass and size (the two of which define density).

Mathematics is the most terse way to express an idea. Would you get marks if you explained what's going on entirely in English?

Net force would still be zero. The end of the video discusses how it would work when not tunneling directly through the core

X-Crisp Zero mass

So, what did you forget to theory calculus? Approximately, 0.987 extra weight time's, every 1234 miles in towards the core creator?

For Earth only and for all the planets of the same size and mass.

The planet loans you energy for the first half of the trip then takes it back during the second.

@@REDPUMPERNICKEL Thanks a lot... So in first half my potential energy will get converted to kinetic and in the second half, that kinetic energy will get converted to potential? So all in all no energy was spent but a person moved hundreds or thousands of kilometers away. Seems so interesting theoretically... Thanks again...

Terminal velocity is a result of wind resistance. That's why they said "Not factoring wind resistance."

Free transporter.. No Coke.. no diesel.. no sweat?