Yeah. Yeah. Ye. Uh huh. Yeah. Yes. Wow. Yeah.

You're absolutely right! I love them both but it would be good if Neil let Lawrence talk and not interrupt his sentences. I love them both though.

Aria Law Neil is so passionate and lively I don’t think his brain recognizes inteription.

@@arialaw9456 Neil can't help himself, he interrupts everyone. Just watch a video called "Neil degrasse Tyson being rude and interrupting Joe Rogan", it's pretty funny

to be fair, tyson is the interviewee. he's supposed to dominate the conversation. i can understand an exchange of ideas if they were co-interviewers/interviewees but this is based on Tyson's origin story, should Krauss have an equal amount of input? of course not. he does tend to interrupt people when theyre talking though. overall i always enjoy krauss related interviews. i immediately subscribed to this channel and will be watching as much content as i can.

ew

@@DavidWMiller why are you here then?

Watching the video, you cleaned up and going for a round two?

David Miller playing with yourself while watching this?

They're my favorite alive scientist tellers too, with Michio Kaku and Brian Green!

Not chemistry. This is physics! I’ll see myself out

24:54 NDT, "Oh, my God." Talk about irony. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rl2iiWp9Z6J_x4k.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kGeZZn6Omoqowmg.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

It made me do an audio only, to audio/visual double take by pulling my phone outof my pocket to confirm it was him. Doesnt it seem as though he's relaxed a bit in the past couple years?.. maybe hes less anxious in general having grown out his beard thereby masking his pockmarked skin. Just a thought.

It makes me wanna yell at him. I hate it. Just start with the topic please.

@@simplyhuman3982 love the name man. Really sums it up. Find myself saying it allot lately.

@@Bytrl thanks.

Lawrence isn't that soft spoken. Just listen to him outside this podcast, even in this podcast he isn't

Max Beamer Dude that’s totally me haha

You are spot on. Watch 56:46 - 57:20 lol

He has several programs running in his brain, simultaneously. One of the biggest TUMORS for Krauss’s brain is ME!😁🤓💡😁😁☝️💪🧠💥💥💥💥🎉🎉🎉😂

He doesn't talk perfect like ME

Koala Nectar I was alone, in the middle of the night, in my lab. And, You all were my Teachers. You can’t hardly claim it. What if You want to say that you taught me Astrophysics? What if I wanna say that I taught Dawkins a little molecular genetics. And, what if I single leg Kermit?

In fairness, NDT is the one being interviewed, so Krauss is yielding to him when he has more to add to his previous thoughts.

Ivanus Prime Flippin Buddies My dang Buddies!!!! Neither is bothered.

Tyson : lots to say Comments : memes

crush537 I’m ankle picking 👀

He can't interrupt someone that says nothing. This meme is painfully outdated.

Conor S you know what ?! I may agree with what your saying but I reserve the right to disagree with how you say it!

The lack of manners is an emotional issue for Neil. He's excited to talk. His eyes say he never sleeps. or maybe he talks in his sleep? Neil, ever place a recorder next to your bed at night?

I think his mind works too fast his mouth is trying to catch up and say what he's thinking. 🤷🏻

Well , an important message should be properly shared

Both these clowns only have humor, not content. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rl2iiWp9Z6J_x4k.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kGeZZn6Omoqowmg.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

Black B same here. Just seemed like two enthusiastic people having a spirited discussion, I loved it. I wish more people had passion like this.

It seems like you just enjoyed the show. Thats all.

Perhaps it stems from them being interested in what only one if the two have to say

Devils Advocacy Notice .... It can be frustrating to recieve only a partial answer to a question one has no chance of asking in person ....

So you liked listening to two clowns. Amazing. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rl2iiWp9Z6J_x4k.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kGeZZn6Omoqowmg.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

Ted LeMoine Yes! Or about this dangerously military style dent proof, scratch proof, bulletproof armored vehicle for Mars, called the Tesla truck. Apparently it’s going to be scaring families and children on the roads…

coz they say nothing

freeze death... the universe is accelerating in its expansion. No heat in that Ted. lol.

@@Sammasambuddha : Agreed. lol We humans have a body temperature at just 98.0 degF - really low side of the average of the Temperature of our Universe. No heat - No Warmth - hopefully we still maintain consciousness somehow.

Neil is gonna interrupt until expansion pulls everything to his cosmological horizon and he’s alone :/ still loved it. You have to be very vested into the topic and you can “hear past” they interrupting style of his “interviews”

Truly

He is self winding😂

@King EVOII you must be one of the chronicles of judah's fans. I hope you realize what hes preaching is only for one race. When the better solution is about the human species and how to overcome our shortcomings.

They are both clowns for laughter, that's all. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rl2iiWp9Z6J_x4k.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kGeZZn6Omoqowmg.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

Yep, you're 100 per cent correct. It makes DeGrasse Tyson insufferable at times.

This is one of those times it's just gotta be accepted, or maybe like he did with sound bytes and worked on that part to be more impactful for media, he could learn to adjust interruption. It makes him even more unique though, and it's always relevant.

Yeah he actually said is teacher saw he was a disruptive children.

He should stuck to speeches and lectures, it's apparent he's used to formats where he's the only on talking. Brilliant man, but really doesn't know how to have a dialogue.

thats what wizards do.

What I like most is that they both are very human, wearing their egos on the their sleeves, not coming across as cool, dry, elevated intellectuals.

​@@AlanWinterboyegos on their sleeps😮....just wondering if the ego does take a nap😊

@@AlanWinterboy "sleeps"?

@@arlen1630 Damned voice text robot. Off to correct, lol Thx

@@TomHuston43 Damned voice text robot. Off to correct, lol Thx

NDT is a clown along with Krauss. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rl2iiWp9Z6J_x4k.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kGeZZn6Omoqowmg.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

@@2fast2block Your a dumbass

@@2fast2block Okey. We already saw you. Now we can get back the important stuff.

@@dres4039 you saw what I wrote and totally ignore it because you can't deal with it as you pretend to only accept important things. You stu-pid lying clown, go act as if you're so dignified to other dingbats that believe you.

@@2fast2block Oh so you must have evidence for this supernatural creator. Care to share it with us?

ya great for closed minded materialist with a sprinkle of arrogance

The teacher that gave him the ad for classes at the Hayden Planetarium knew he loved astronomy.

I'm going into physics next semester at ASU so just now hearing about him leaving is really disappointing. I was looking forward to seeing a lecture from him one day.

@@borodmislovich8239 you tube has many great lectures from him. Check them out, there's hours and hours of physics lectures and religious debate type content. But I see what you mean, a live lecture would be great.

A victim of changing times

Why cause u loke to hear yourself tall.. being annoyed by Neil is super nuts

Yes.. 2 minutes in and it's nearly unbearable.

Dude, this was a battle of who went where and who did what!

because this is about Neil talking.

Take the words "yeah, yeah, yeah" out of Lawrence's vocabulary or edit them out of this video and it becomes much less annoying.

His point about soundbites really drove that home. It's something I have been using for a while when in conversation with friends or family that aren't well versed on some topics, but wasn't actually aware of it.

Everyone gotta pay the bills somehow

Ive heard Sam harris mention that if you email him and tell him you cant afford, hell give you it for free.

dont be mean to Sam Harris. he said he gives you a free subscription if you're too pour

Yeah! I wanted to comment on this. God he's so ignorant of reality.

Do you mean equal chance or equal privilege?

Umm.... Any natural born citizen can run. Question is, are you great enough to grow a following and raise campaign funds from people?

Mister Amesa inheriting millions of dollars and having a father who is a former president does not make one great

Whether you like him or not he’s the only President with an MBA (Harvard) so he’s not as dumb as a lot of people think

thats why he was friends with epstein. great guy

haha me too didn't expect to find this comment

same here 😂

Well not this on this specific one, but on every other StarTalk video. Sure.

It makes me understand EVERYTHING...but when the high is gone...pufff...I m back to my regular non mathematical brain

I'm watching a comedy. Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God: Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?" Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know." from the beginning of this video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rl2iiWp9Z6J_x4k.html What we KNOW and have NO doubts about... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God. Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kGeZZn6Omoqowmg.html He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.

but but but we are watching this podcast to learn more about Tyson so... its just the way he is

Well Neil Degrasse - after poking fun at the 3 UFO videos - what is your comment now that US Navy has confirmed the 3 UFO videos are Authentic and do capture an Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, according to the US Navy . And now the US Army has signed a CRADA deal to study UFO metal samples supplied by TTSA according to all media reports = where are your debunking comments now Neil Degrasse

@@spookyninja4098 He would repeat that simply because they are unidentified does not mean they are extraterrestrial. Carl Sagan also said Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

@Ken Havens - Obviously Neil has not bothered to see the " Extraordinary " evidence for himself. Please tell me which Earth nation can build and fly a device that can defy the laws of Physics and out perform all US Navy aircraft and technology ??? ukposts.info/have/v-deo/iIKYo5-qf4ietnk.html

@@spookyninja4098 what did he have to debunk or laugh about initially? it seemd pretty hard to debunk. and metal samples?

Screw your damn manners

Hey Neil Detroit has a statue of ROBO COP