6:27

Federe has eagle´s eyes. When he correct empires, he was always right.

W.A.P. Bodie if you make a serve, you know if it’s in or not. Just a question of honesty

W.A.P. Bodie Not really tbh I play tennis (I’m not a pro just for fun) but you can tell when a serve is in or not believe me. It’s like in football when you know if the balk has crossed the line as a keeper

MUFC I’ll wait for someone to fact check this. Some of them true, but definitely not all of them.

Timestamp?

@@wooshbait36 0:16

@MUFC Lmao get a load of this guy. I'm not even american but your rant sounds ludicrous at best. Grow up mate.

@MUFC Please shut up you're embarrassing yourself.

I hate when umpires don't know the rules properly, it was a clear hindrance from the crowd and should have been called as a let, thank god Rafa did that prick's job for him and gave him a first serve.

CR2477 lmao the commentator he’s damn funny😂

I was literally scrolling through the comments and he said that as I seen your comment

Yes. Also againist kachanov too

yes, I think Mannarino should have just conceded the point even though the umpire called it wrong. Wawrinka played it as a legit hit anyway.

@@SquidDesign yeah, and Mannarino could've never reached the next ball anyways even without any call.

Generosity - not sportsmanship, kid.

O dont see how that's sportsmanship, if you obviously won the point you dont have to give it away

Kris43 technically didn’t win the point as the call was made before the winner. Although nice sportsman ship

@@q0056 he meant that even if it wasn't double bounce Stan woulda won the point

@@q0056Manarino had no chance of winning the point after that bad call. So he gave up a point that was his.

António Sá Gomes that’s irrelevant. In the rules of the game if the call is made prior to the final shot then the point should be replayed. The umpire made more than 1 error in this point

@@q0056 bro he's not arguing with you he knows, he's just saying Stan is a great guy for doing for reversing a bad call even to the extent of losing a point that was clearly his

LiL Moonman yea no

Stan is the man

LiL Moonman Like Chokerer

He left his wife and 1 year old baby...

@@zafferung4440 he talking about tennis,not personal life

Yes, he is the worst sportsmanship.

I thought the same thing lol

Credit to Haase as well cause he could´ve easily given up but decided to finish the match because he knew that was the match that made Federer number 1 again.

not all of them sadly (karen khachalow lied in this clip about the call)

@@IAMSOUND99 I disagree. I thought he was pretty close to the ball.

@@Andyyu24 oh my, you guys are joking right? how is that relevant? of course he was close and could easily hit it back but he thought the ball was out and let it go (way before the line judge said "out"). the rule in this situation is to give the point to Wawrinka but Karen lied by saying the line judge called it out before he could make a decision (to hit or let the ball go) and Stan believed him. The fact that he was close to the ball is irrelevant, it's about the line judge call timing here.

@@IAMSOUND99He was close and he could have hit the ball. You may be right about the timing of the call but it happened very fast and if you play tennis, you should know this kind of mistake could happen and it could have been just an honest mistake. Give players the benefit of doubts and I don't like calling him a liar or dishonest person just coz of that. I respect your opinion but it's just yours. Respect mine and cheer for Stan!!!!

@@Andyyu24 Yeah yeah i respect your opinion but this isn't a matter of opinion here, you can rewatch the vid the call clearly came after Karen gave away the ball already, it's a fact. the thing is it's a very common thing for pro tennis players with poor sportsmanship to lie on "when they heard the call" because it totally changes the point outcome: if the call is before the player is able to hit the ball the point is replayed for them and not lost, so they abuse it (cf. Novak vs Tsonga: Djokovic throws a tantrum at the umpire for losing the point when the replay clearly shows the call was late and the umpire made a good decision)

100%

Always hit the ball, if it was out, then the hit will be nullified anyways... Khachanov took the easy way out there.

yes, good sportsmanship by Stan, not so great by Khacnanov. He sort of let it go "hoping" for the out call and then it just did not pan out that way.

I think Khachanov definitely could’ve hit the ball but thought it was out. He would’ve been on his back foot and it may not have been the best return but he clearly seems within reach. The one where Stan replayed the point against Mannarino I thought was being way too nice. No way in hell Mannarino gets to that second ball

@@SJ-di5zu true that. Khachanov however blamed the outing to not hit the ball. Instead of just making sure he gets the point, he tries getting the point after a line judge failure. Mannarino in no way would have claimed the point, knowing sure and well Wawrinka beat his shot fair and square, he was just momentarily lapsed out on the wrong call. That makes it different to me, Mannarino went after the call, Khachanov after the point he himself lost.

I think he's a little "too good" about it... he concedes points to his rivals, even when some balls are CLEARLY out/in the court... he's even kinda goof at this, to some extent (not calling balls in the eagle-eye)...

@@natoskull2 Yeah agree with this. Sure he's a good sportsman but sometimes it's a bit like oh look at me everyone I'm being so good. Doesn't always seem genuine.

@@jensclarberg6419 But fed is always genuine XDDD

Jens Clarberg In my opinion it's the other way around.

Djokerbitch has a sick obsession to be loved it's so embarrassing cringeworthy and fake

It was arrogant

When?

@@kaysur666510:58

King Mohammed Lahyani

Nikminnit I would’ve argued for hours if someone wanted that one replayed lol Stan’s the most sportsmanlike player i’ve ever seen

Seriously, that was ridiculously nice of him.

Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not lol, but that is the literal definition of sportsmanship.

@@danielpotts1172 I wasn't being sarcastic. But I looked up the definition and you are correct. Somehow I always assumed that sportsmanship is when you go beyond the pale of simple rules and fairness, to make a rare generous gesture, when it is not strictly required according to the rules. For example, replaying a point because you know your opponent wasn't ready, even though you don't have to. To my mind there should be nothing extraordinary in simply following the rules honestly, which are obviously there to ensure fairness. So 'sportsmanship' according to this definition, should not be extraordinary or rare at all, but simply the order of the day. However, it seems that today this is far from being the case, and is something to be remarked on when it happens...? That was my point.

@@cscoetzee Not sure how Daniel thought you might be being sarcastic either, when you clearly weren't. I agree with you as well that it's nuts that simple fair play is pointed out as sportsmanship. It must be because in this day and age this seldom happens

yep. so good

Of course he is confident, he is the second or third best player in the world after Djoković and maybe Nadal

@@wooshbait36 It depends, for some Federer is 1., for others Nadal, for others Djocovic. March 2021, Djocovic is 1. for the longest period of time so I'll say Djocovic is n.1 right now

Was about to say the same . Simply WOW

Exactly he cheated

Ikr he was wrong

only 1mm part of the ball clips the line, you'll think it's out lol

that's what I was thinking as well

Go SAO PAULO FC....

My thoughts also. This is the guys who personally insulted Medvedev about is Russian heritage. Just one of many unsportsmanlike incidents for Tsitsipas.

@@rahamanahmed1064 you should have watched the whole match to see what Medvedev did during the match.

@@rahamanahmed1064 really? Huh, that's funny because Tsitsipas is half Russian.

@@rahamanahmed1064 uhmmm tsitsipas is half russian

"Buulsheeeet Russian" Stefanos Tsitsipas

Shivam Shukla Cricket is fucking balls.

he called Federer the GoAT

@@kweej23 thats what makes him a true sportsman, a champion and a great human being!

Yeah the call definitely didn't hinder him, Stan was too nice here

@@tomr6955 He definitely was, but I think he was trying to keep the match moving and understood his opponent may be a bit delusional

Sound may lag behind video.

Listenchump He is a great guy but seems a little too much self critical,and he let's that show too much.

@@dragonmade8243 Yes indeed

100%

L. Gyger I totally agree with you!

Sound may lag behind video.

What a cunt, can´t even spell Federer. And if you look closely at 6:22 he does actually thank him.

Ferguson lol i do know. Its a typo. Get over it.

Yeah he shouldn't have asked in the middle of the match though. He's young so he probably didn't know any better but Zverev couldn't waste the time to sign it during the match, although im fairly certain he signed after the match if he won