nio or audi is farthur or any other manufacturer

Well, paying 400M a year to your CEO when your company just bleeds out is insane. They will go bankrupt before this releases.

@@ricardosousa11 which company are you talkin about?

Literally Lucid, check their recently released Earnings Report @@yorianwesterveen4619

well they are known to break down and have numerous issues. i will admit most EVs as of now are not perfect, but at least a lexus or mercedes-benz electric car won't break down constantly

um Tesla! Unless by "price" you mean Costs WAY more

@@teslabot5650this vehicle has a range of 440 miles.

​@miles5600 my Tesla has a 310 mile range and even that feels excessive when you're charging every night. Sounds like a bunch of extra weight to be able to claim a high number that 99.9% of people won't utilize

@@loganrenton8303 100% bragging rights.

@@loganrenton8303 well not everyone has to get a lucid nor polestar right? People tend to choose based on their needs and while i need to drive a lot and cover large distances i still wouldn’t choose lucid cause they’re really new to the market and it will have defects so my choose is the ioniq 5 which drives amazing, has a great sound system and feels light and compact while being pretty darn fast.

So proud of Peter Rawlinson being a worlds moat GREEDT CEO

@@nittansharma6341 There are CEO's that make more than that. You just don't realize it. Musk makes significantly more than Rawlinson. In the ballpark of 55 billion. You should look it up before you post.

❤❤

Not startup companies@@ekscholl

You should have seen me when I was 16 😂😂

You had the GRAVITATIONAL PULL!!!????

Looks like a mini van

​@@Freddy_Confetti because it is? Air also looks like sedan because it is.

Agreed. They just partnered with Riyadh air.

Saudis were born rich. They have no business sense.

@@AbolishCommunismno. This vehicle will do insanely well here.

Agreed.

Yup! That’s why it’s called Lucid Group for a reason. Lucid is the hub epicenter of it all. It is the tree and other companies it will acquire/partnership with will be its branches!

Next is the affordable lucid.. ‘like something below 50.000 and when that happend… booom lucid wîll lead the way for EV

@@fedsmadegoodmade907050,000 isn’t affordable. Affordable is 25,000 and under, way under.

funny thing is Porsche has the 800v system in its Porsche taycan.

900 v

As long Peter Rawlinson doesn't get greedy and think about shareholders

900 v

@@Alberto-xw8vx allegedly 900v or more, although irrelevant most commercial chargers can’t handle that or produce that.

$100k is phenomenal, indeed. Lolol...

hummmmm 80k is by all means not a fair price. It’s an expensive car. Chinese EVs has more features with half of the price. Also the service and charging networks post serious questions for broad adoption.

*minivan they created.

focus on what they said. top notch quality. @@jianwei2009

The losers of the future?…. Probably

That's because it's actually a minivan :)

​@@DrTheRichlet me guess, a Tesla fanboy..

@@hobo1704 lol wut, your mind works in weird ways if that's the conclusion you come to based on my comment...

Needs an optional gas range extender for us in apt. This would also add hundreds of miles to the range installed where the rear seats go down a hybrid Prius gets 700 mile range fills up in2 minutes or less

Needs all wheel steering

@@Tigerex966 It ain't no stinkin' Prius

@@curtiszbikowskiI smell a rat. it's a stinkier gravity 🤥🫣 O sold 0 track record about to go bankrupt basically a minivan without sliding doors and only 440 miles range 220 when it's cold, stuck when it's freezing. .to be fair both are entirely different vehicles. .this is closer to the sienna minivan Lexus has a version in Japan that's even closer. .this really does need either a hybrid, plugin 8r at least a small gas generator for say 100 miles from gas to increase the range preheat the batteries especially. In freezing cold or when chargers are not working. That vehicle at the right price would sell like hotcakes. Americans who want evs actually would prefer some sort of gas backup. 8n it. Like a reverse plug in and bmw first ev with the gas generator.

I was thinking the same thing.

"starting at, under..." men this is the weirdest car-salesman sentence i've heard so far... So better believe almost every version or variant of the car will end up above 80k

@@DrTheRich It is still cheaper than Porsche or Modell X. 🤣

That's what is almost impossible at this stage Elon is no joke when he says ramping EV production is hard

​@@deepnijjar5 You actually believe what Elon says 🤣

@hobo1704 you don't have to believe you can see and analyze yourself I mean only if you have eyes n brain to do that

Me too

Allegedly, trying to get those Fed Tax dollars < $80 k required.

@@OutofSpecStudios Ah that explains the weird sentence "starts at, less than..."

Looks like a mini van

you gotta sell cars and make money to do that.

It won’t be…..or a much less equipped car. It will be more than 100k$

Saudi PIF :-)

Exactly,I was thinking over $100k easy.

You can. They announced the partnership with Tesla but most of the chargers they have are slow 150kwh chargers with 400v..But still I guess better than nothing.

@@rohitkurup6191 As long as it charges as fast as a Tesla, I'm good. It's rare that I need to spend more than 20 minutes at a Super Charger.

@@rohitkurup6191 It's a bit worse than that. At 400V you won't see more than 50kW. Lucid comes with EA charging for free for up to three years, depending on trim level. EA's network will charge a Lucid much faster...if it works. But if it doesn't, and I have to pay for charging anyway, and I won't get more than 50kW from Tesla (plus the cables aren't likely to reach) then I could use any CCS provider with 50kW or more until Tesla gets its act together and builds a V4 network with 1000V support. By the time the Gravity comes out, it will have NACS so you will be able to charge at Tesla Superchargers. Assuming that the other providers add NACS by then, you'll be able to charge there too. But I wouldn't be surprised if you needed an adapter as a backup, in case there are CCS stations that haven't been converted and the only Tesla chargers around are pre-V4.

Ditto!!!

It won’t be $80k….

@@thadlm2698They literally said it is less than 80k.

@@UltimatePokeGamer7 okay…we’ll see☺️

@@thadlm2698 Considering that you can get an Air Pure for under $75k, with AWD, I think that Lucid has kept its word on delivering a base trim at a good price. I wouldn't have expected the RWD to be that low at this point.

I doubt it. Lucid is a premium brand. Trucks are just not glamorous. You don’t really see Mercedes or BMW trucks in America. If they make one it would be years down the line. Most likely next models will be smaller Air and Gravity and be around $50-$60k.

@@user-ii3cf6xe5v That makes sense.

Do you have electricity in the after Brexit? You know you need to charge em… 😂😂🫶joking joking

I’m on the same boat!

@@UltimatePokeGamer7 Unfortunately I'm into LCID at $27/share with most of my $55k evaporated!

I always find it fascinating, that very fancy and high tech products are often hold back buy subpar decisions in software developments. I have the same with a mechanical keyboard I bought. The physical product is amazing, but the software lacks so many useful features.... And being a software developer, I know how relatively simple it is to implement a split screen functionality. The lack of it in the air software as you said has nothing to do with it being too difficult or expensive... Just bad decisions. I wish car screen software would be open-source, so people could design plugins or their own variants of the software and modify it how ever you want. Sadly the world is moving towards less choice, freedom and personalization not more.

I ❤the sapphire personally but the gravity is tempting!

I know right me too I want one so bad

Ford Flex was the dad mini van back in the day. Still kinda is. Gravity takes it up a notch, bringing luxury and performance. I suspect this will be a major seller, kinda like Kia Telluride. It's going to bite into so many luxury brand, like Tesla did.

People like to categorize things and then go by image, but let's look at how the images came into place. First there were station wagons. They took people to and from train stations, had room for luggage, and held more passengers. Over time, they morphed into extended sedans with room in the back for cargo and possibly extra seating. Then they got a reputation as "moms' cars" as if there's something wrong with that. Then Iacocca came up with the idea of the minivan. He took something more macho, a van, and turned it into a better solution than a station wagon. But over time, they got a reputation as a soccer mom's car, as if there's anything wrong with that. The reality is that they were good at carrying passengers and cargo. Then SUVs started taking the place of minivans, since SUVs were off road vehicles with uncomfortable truck chassis, that were somehow more masculine. But few buyers took them off the road much, if ever, once they became popular. As they evolved, they got car-like suspensions, more comfort and luxury, and became crossovers and MPVs. They are actually closer to the original notion of a station wagon than a modern station wagon is. For practical purposes, they are a better vehicle for most people. And station wagon might even be a more accurate term than minivan, since they don't have sliding doors. But there's a question of image. Call them crossovers and people will buy them. The whole idea of what is and isn't an SUV fell apart once Tesla came up with AWD with motors at each end and no drive shaft, because the fundamental issue of chassis type no longer made sense. Broad definitions of platform no longer apply. So let people throw shade at any category that they want, and let them explain why, aside from sexism, they feel that way. They won't have a good answer in all likelihood.

@@bW9taeH4 Wow, that was a lot of words just to call me inexcusably sexist. You sexualized the living sh*t out my comment, when in reality I specifically said "designed for adults and not just families" to clearly de-sexualize my opinion of minivans.

@@Kee_Diddy If it came across that way, it wasn't my intent. It's the image of minivans, station wagons etc in general that has evolved based on that, not your views specifically that are in question. The stigma is there, rightly or wrongly, and its roots are clear.

@@bW9taeH4 *"So let people throw shade at any category that they want, and let them explain why, aside from sexism, they feel that way. They won't have a good answer in all likelihood."* I recognize that there can be a sexist stigma behind minivans-- I just don't identify with that idea or acknowledge it the way you do. I don't appreciate your totalitarian stance that, if you don't like the image of minivans, you are sexist, which is essence of what you're implying. Everyone knows that the primary usage of a minivan is for children, and whether you associate that with men or women is up to you, although naive. I'm cutting to the chase and associating it with children, which I do not have nor do I currently have a plan to have, and therefore do not want to drive a vehicle that identifies me as such. I think this idea is much more popular than your idea around minivans and sexism would allow you to consider.

Yes, they finally figured out Tesla has the best charging standard and joined the club.

@@thadlm2698 The standard isn't better but the reliability is better and the connector is better as long as it's not an overly thick cable. I have a Tesla wall connector at home capable of 80A, and with a thick cable. It's harder to manipulate than the one that comes with the Lucid, but that won't be the case for a V3+ Supercharger. Until the V4 ones come out, CCS still has better chargers at 350kW and 1000V, but it's a moot point if they aren't reliable. If they work, I should be able to add up to 200 miles of range in 12 minutes, as opposed to well over an hour at a Tesla Supercharger with a Lucid, until V4 gets deployed.