yea that's how it is unfortunately business: inquiriesdnd101@gmail.com
КОМЕНТАРІ: 123
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
Like and subscribe if you like the content
@Relisysification11 місяців тому
Be careful, with honesty like this you may get a visit from the Pinkos
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
oh yea I forgot about that😂 thats crazy tbh to call the pinkertons
@Relisysification11 місяців тому
@@Harlems_Chambers sadly, not the first time Hasbro has done it either (would provide sources but links in comments affect the algorithm iirc)
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
@@Relisysification oh crap, yea I hope ill be fine, if I ever suddenly stop making videos you know what happenned
@SyxxPunk10 місяців тому
Remember, Hasbro sees the customers as an obstacle between them and THEIR money.
@Harlems_Chambers10 місяців тому
Thats a good line! will surely use it in a future video
@urieldaluz2509 місяців тому
It’s a direct quote too. From a shareholder meeting. Same one where they said dnd was “under monetized” I think
@messiha6666 місяців тому
Most companies do. Dealing with customers is a necessity, not a goal.
@segevstormlord371327 днів тому
Who do they think they are? The Federal Government? ;) ...what do you mean, "I only think I'm joking?"
@AuronFAnatic11 місяців тому
The difference between a privately owned company and a publicly traded one. Also, Paizo was founded and is run by people who used to work for WOTC before Hasbro bought them out, and Hasbro gave them a big payout when they took over, too.
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
yea thats true, thats why I prefer pathfinder tbh
@CrizzyEyes9 місяців тому
Paizo is a funny story because I used to not like them back when Pathfinder 1E came out and I heard about how they treated the Rogue class. Supposedly, the reason why original Rogue was so garbage in 1E was because one of the lead designers was extremely biased against them. To the point where a playtester who reported that they were lackluster actually provoked a spite response from this guy who nerfed them even harder. However, I'll take a million genuine enthusiasts who have weird opinions that I disagree with, out of real passion for the hobby, over a single corporate suit who doesn't give any fucks about the hobby.
@yoman80276 місяців тому
@@CrizzyEyes At least they changed it in the Unchained book, while buffing the monk too... and nerfing the summoner.
@michaelshigetani4333 місяці тому
@@CrizzyEyes ooh, you'll love Rogue's in 2e Remaster. More skills than god. Legit a rogue can get every skill in the game. That's not counting the feats. Options; Rogues got more than anyone I think, Maybe Fighter can compete Lots of flexibility
@WolfWalrus11 місяців тому
Paizo: Every book is packed with both lore stuff and tonnes of rules options for both players and game masters to customise the game however they want! Let's work towards a more inclusive gaming space for everyone! WotC: 🚬 The Spelljammer book doesn't have rules for ship-to-ship combat, don't bother. Buy a separate board game to get army battles in Dragonlance. Get your DM to fix any problems with our busted game.
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
sadly thats how it really is
@WolfWalrus11 місяців тому
@@Harlems_Chambers the spelljammer thing is the bit that irks me the most, because 5e already had functional vehicular combat (in Ghosts of Saltmarsh and Descent into Avernus). WotC is happy to just sit on their IPs, content in the knowledge that there are third-party publishers making actual content for their games. I always compare 5e with Skyrim, since they're both stripped back to make them accessible to everyone at the cost of losing any real depth, and the developers know that any issues will be fixed by a dedicated modding community
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
@@WolfWalrus I dont think they care to make quality books anymore since the garbage ones bring just as much money, since the goal is maximum profit, not making good content
@CrizzyEyes9 місяців тому
@@WolfWalrus The Creation Club was like Bethesda's "OGL change" scandal as well, an attempt to make paid mods the norm and ruin everything that makes the game successful in the long term. The analogy works too well.
@WolfWalrus9 місяців тому
@@CrizzyEyes "The fifth game in a long-running and well respected RPG series, removing features to make it more broadly accessible at the cost of the complexity that their hard-core fan base has come to love. People generally agree the third one was the best, only veteran old school players play the second, and lots of people pretend to play the first but we all know they're lying."
@heyfell43019 місяців тому
Three months later: "Sir, the Kineticist is released!" "WHEN I SAID YOU SHOULD MAKE IT STRONGER I DIDN'T MEAN IT SHOULD BE THE BEST CLASS IN THE GAME!" "But sir, people are liking the class, they say it's really cool and unique." "Oh, really? Then it's okay, people really wanted to re-enact ATLA I guess. Get a raise."
@Harlems_Chambers8 місяців тому
I did not know about that🤣
@michaelshigetani4333 місяці тому
yep, pretty much, Though I don't think it's OP compared to the other classes. Just SEEMS like it.
@heyfell43013 місяці тому
@@michaelshigetani433 yeah, playing Kineticist definitely makes you get a grip at how balanced it is. It's still probably the strongest in the game all things considered, but not by a wide margin.
@michaelshigetani4333 місяці тому
@@heyfell4301 eh, Spells can do more damage generally. BUT the ability to toss them every turn does help. Technically everything the kinetics can do a spell does better. BUT damnn it's fun!
@kid1434611 місяців тому
I do like the critique of Paizo paying artists well below standard for their work... seriously that is the one big thing Paizo need to work hard on.
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
yea I saw somebody say they barely pay their artist so I thought I should put it in
@aralornwolf31409 місяців тому
@@Harlems_Chambers, Meanwhile WotC uses AI art... *Shrugs*
@Alex-cq1zr7 місяців тому
@@Harlems_Chambers I heard that Paizo actually pays well... compared to abysmal industry standard. Ttrpgs aren't ultra profitable, unless you produce dnd.
@user-go4vz2ir6r2 місяці тому
That is an industry issue for sure. But at least they pay artists, and not AI programs....
@user-klepikovmd11 місяців тому
You're fired. Ok, now I'm working for Paizo😂😂😂
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
yea pretty much😂
@triomegazero11 місяців тому
"I'm fired? Good thing I was already freelancing for Paizo!"
@ardentdrops9 місяців тому
Why would hasbro print a rulebook when they could print half a rulebook and call it "roleplaying focused"?
@Harlems_Chambers8 місяців тому
true🤣👌
@anothertarnishedone59609 місяців тому
Pinkerton notices
@Harlems_Chambers9 місяців тому
oh shit😨
@FiveofHearts111 місяців тому
Anyone else notice how hard Wizards is pushing hardback book sales? Like they really don't make many softbacks. Just seems odd, since hardback tends to be more expensive. They also don't print short as many short adventure modules anymore. Everything is like a full 50 dollar book.
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
yea thats pretty much what it is
@growingsage9 місяців тому
Not to mention that books printed now *Will* fall apart with how cheaply bound their books are, forcing people to buy books more often or frustrate them enough to have them go purely digital
@braindavidgilbert31479 місяців тому
@@growingsageand digital is cheaper for them, because you either buy a pdf, or you get a subscription service
@goji25316 днів тому
Weird complaint though. I like hardcovers. They're weighty and look good on the shelf too instead of just being an ugly paperstack while not in use. Of all the many problems WotC has, them making books that actually feel good to hold is like.... the last that'd I'd ever expect.
@FiveofHearts116 днів тому
@goji253 They also cost way more and are unnecessary for things like a quick adventure one shot. And frankly I don't care how good they look on a shelf. That's what coffee table books are for.
@calemr11 місяців тому
How did you manage to sneak cameras into their offices?
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
I rolled a nat 20 in stealth
@user-go4vz2ir6r2 місяці тому
Sweet Rogue skilz!! Lol
@5-Volt9 місяців тому
Damn it's so true.. Wizard's books do have some great cover art..
@Harlems_Chambers8 місяців тому
they put a lot more effort in the cover art than the content🤣
@Lowgraphicsdeer9 місяців тому
All of my money already went to games workshop
@Harlems_Chambers8 місяців тому
now they cant steal your money🤣
@primedko99997 місяців тому
My group and I switched to Pathfinder 2 about 3 months ago, and I can't even look at D&D 5e anymore. The Pathfinder system is superior in every aspect, and I feel that the material treats me with respect (I'm the DM), providing me with all the tools I need.
@michaelshigetani4333 місяці тому
I feel the same. Same thing happened to me. I decided to try Pathfinder 2e after the OGL business. And found myself going "I should have tried this sooner" the system for building encounters is the BEST I've ever seen. (if I have to list all the games that includes we'll have a book)
@user-go4vz2ir6r2 місяці тому
Yeah, WOTC seems to treat the DM like a slave. Paizo like a valued customer.
@chukyuniqul3 дні тому
Y E S! I actually have mechanics instead of being treated like a performing monkey to draw people to buy their sodding products.
@Skaxarrat20 днів тому
This is not a joke video, this is a documentary.
@techdruid43714 місяці тому
Damn so on the money.
@cianthompson96611 місяців тому
This would be good as Shorts layout, vertical 🙌
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
yea I could try my next video as a short, good idea👌
@Machamp-ps7wx8 днів тому
The Pinks are rapidly approaching your location
@Keldren.11 місяців тому
Nailed it
@caihly24437 місяців тому
Hopefully the union within Paizo fixes their two main problems; bad pay and opaque management
@user-go4vz2ir6r2 місяці тому
"Bad pay" is an issue industry wide.
@legendarydigitize25238 місяців тому
Nothing about the ogl fiasco on how it affected pathfinder 2e sales vs dnd 5e sales?
@Harlems_Chambers8 місяців тому
how did it affect the sales between the 2?
@legendarydigitize25238 місяців тому
@@Harlems_Chambers i remember seeing some news that the crb for pf2e, physical copies anyway Ran out Because many are migrating to such Myself included Honestly like pf2e more Even has room for all sorts of builds for most classes like my first one i built in pathbuilder 2e, a tengu monk The monk has all sorts of build options Such as a ranged monk, or the classic hand to hand monk with stances, or a melee weapon using one Then i started to build more and more characters of all sorts of classes(still cant figure out investigator right) My faves right now being Thaumaturge and Oracle
@rainraven98816 місяців тому
@@legendarydigitize2523 Not only did they run out of copies of the CRB, they ran out of what was suppposed to be an eight month supply of the CRB in a matter of weeks. It was absolutely bonkers in the best way.
@themanhimself56506 місяців тому
Yo 😂😂 this was great
@shadetheskeleton1634День тому
Does Paizo not pay their artists???
@freya002YT11 місяців тому
True
@realdragonМісяць тому
How they really treat their customers DnD: We offer product and we want money from you PF: We offer product and we want money from you
@gackybass27 днів тому
Drastic difference - All rules for pathfinder are available free, officially sanctioned by paizo. (Archives of Nethys) For D&D 5e you get the piddly system reference document which has... Uh, like 5 levels of features for 5 or 6 classes, plus barely enough spells to cover that progression. This illustrates the core difference - paizo understands that they are selling products for a TTRPG, and so gives out player options and rules freely, due to the nature of the hobby being so focused on per-table customisation and creativity. whereas WotC just sees the "sell product" part and ignores everything else. You can see the same attitude in how they manage MTG, with the constant absurd powercreep and refusal to ban format breaking cards for as long as they actively print them.
@citereh613519 днів тому
Isn't it like... Everything works, no?
@realdragon19 днів тому
@@citereh6135 It seems like people often forget that
@Joeys-Channel11 місяців тому
To be fair there is a lot of mindless dnd drones that will keep buying dnd
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
yea unfortunatly, I saw the greatness of pathfinder and my friends prefer pathfinder too
@Joeys-Channel11 місяців тому
@@Harlems_Chambers same here, so many great systems that aren't dnd for sure
@SunDry_Marchy11 місяців тому
Sad but true Economy is broken, but Paizo are still the least of two evils
@zombi3DSМісяць тому
As a person who is stuck playing D&D 5e because it is what my friends run but runs Pathfinder 1e personally: I do think that the idea that Paizo is without sin gets a little too syncophantic. Paizo is much better about keeping any outrage they induce in us smaller and more personal. I find great irony in the idea that Paizo takes feedback. When we were helping them playtest 2e, the head of their messageboards and the COO's partner straight up stated that 1 any feedback outside their very specific playtest material testing was not something they wanted. (Ie they wanted us to test if healing was well balanced but only at levels 8-10, with a specfic party composition that all could cast off the divine list and exclusively while fighting undead.) 2 when people asked why the above, he cited that he had worked on Magic the Gathering's Alpha release (Richard Garfield and others remember him playing the game enthusiastically and hired him on to pack boxes during unlimited's printing as it took off) and that no one then had believed that a new unproved business concept like a TCG would work except him and Richard. According to Vic this is a prime example of how the fans don't know what they want even though unproven completely new type of game (Magic) vs evolution of a formula (PF 2e) are two far different situations for fans to be giving input about.
@arturkushukov181519 днів тому
One company makes games. Other company makes profit.
@szegediadam879311 місяців тому
Based on true stories
@RicardoPM77712 днів тому
👏👏👏
@captainrelyk9 місяців тому
You forgot the part where Paizo tells people what character options their allowed to play or not play via ancestry rarity and ACP
@procrastinatinggamer8 місяців тому
Rarity is more about prevalence in the setting and is more just to give newer GMs confidence to ban stuff if they're worried about it causing problems in the game. Nothing stopping a homebrew setting from just making, say, skeletons a common ancestry for example. Or even just changing the rarity to reflect the particular region of Golarion they're in (pretty sure you'd count the Skeleton ancestry as common for a campaign set in Geb like the Blood Lords adventure path). Not sure how the Armour Check Penalty comes into play because that actually disappears if you meet the armour's strength minimum. As long as you hit the armour's Dex cap you actually end up with the same AC whether that armour's leather or splint (except for heavy armour, that one is one point higher but also bloody expensive).
@captainrelyk8 місяців тому
@@procrastinatinggamer not armor check penalties, I meant achievement points
@procrastinatinggamer8 місяців тому
@@captainrelyk Oh, those are only for Pathfinder Society games, the PF version of Adventurer’s League.
@Harlems_Chambers8 місяців тому
oops😶
@procrastinatinggamer8 місяців тому
@@Harlems_ChambersYou didn't forget anything pertinent - rarity's purely a GM tool and the achievement points they were referring to is just for organised play. I'm sure Adventurer's League has something similar.
@stefanobaroncello4509 місяців тому
Yes, Wizards of the Coast are made perfectly.
@TENEBRAELGAMING14 днів тому
lol
@Deathmageddon3 дні тому
I stopped buying WotC products when they admitted that Orcs remind them of black people 😂
@duckymouth9 місяців тому
This implies that paizo forgets to pay people and makes unbalanced classes, then forces people to buy new books to fix them. I think both Pathfinder and dnd are bad.
@CrizzyEyes9 місяців тому
They definitely did the "makes unbalanced classes and forces people to buy new books" thing in 1E. I haven't played 2E, but to my knowledge it's a lot better. So I'm willing to forgive that as a genuine mistake for first edition.
@justnoob81419 місяців тому
And you can thank that to boomer in 2008 that cause this kind of shit to happen
@aralornwolf31409 місяців тому
This was incorrect... what they were talking about was a play test material... quoting the complaint, I think, about the playtest for the just released Kineticist. However, unlike D&D, _all_ of Pathfinder2e rules are available for free online the Archives of Nethys. So, no purchase is necessary.
@duckymouth9 місяців тому
@@aralornwolf3140 Pathfinder is definitely better than dnd, I just think that both are bad. I usually like playing indie RPGs to support small creators and to find something more specific to what I want an rpg to be like without any excessive homebrewing.
@user-go4vz2ir6r2 місяці тому
Well, there are many other fish in the sea......
@mkklassicmk3895Місяць тому
D&D has been nothing but good to me. Every complaint I hear about them has been stupid.
@scorchmcscorchyson759718 днів тому
Horrible balancing both between PCs and in the awful CR system? Missing content and systems such as magic items not having prices and the SPELLJAMMER BOOK not having any rules for SPELLJAMMER COMBAT?
@mkklassicmk389518 днів тому
@@scorchmcscorchyson7597 First of all, balancing encounters is a bad idea. Secondly, by balancing the PCs do you mean the classes? The thing about the ship combat is not entirely true. Ship combat works the same as regular combat. It's basically just mounted combat.
@scorchmcscorchyson759715 днів тому
@@mkklassicmk3895 the classes are not balanced against one another leading to incredible disparities in ability between the PCs, yes. And it’s not things you’d expect, like the barbarian being the tanky-est or whatever, it’s spellcasters having a monopoly on all aspects of gameplay in a way martials can’t compete with. Not to mention martials having extremely boring combat, worst offender of which is the rogue who gets a single attack every turn that they have to go for in order to make their damage competitive. Want to double your odds of hitting sneak attack? Now you have to spend your bonus action to do so, making you EVEN LESS INTERESTING in combat. And what do you mean balancing encounters is a bad idea? It’s a GOOD idea to provide a challenge you know is unlikely to be lethal. Difficult encounters are fun because encounters that are too easy or too hard aren’t. 5e puts all of the work in the GM, from magic item prices, to how to run ship combat (they’re not going to tell you), go the crafting system, to balancing their game for them because the CR system is broken. That’s bad design.
@of56068 днів тому
@@mkklassicmk3895 "balancing encounters is a bad idea" is the take of the year I think
@Sinsults11 місяців тому
I have to disagree on most points. 5e was my first real dive in to table top rpg. I'd played some others, like Vampire, but never got in to it because the rules and lore were so convoluted and involved. Whilst stripping it down to make it more accessible to new players might seem lazy, it allows for DMs and players to get much more imaginative and forces them not to rely on premade modules all the time. The story is supposed to be written by the players, not the creators of the system. If it's rules for gameplay, yeah you shouldn't have to convert it from older systems, but I've only once had to do that. Regardless, the old systems are still there and you can play them all you want. No one is forcing anyone to buy the new editions. Fifth edition just made it so more people could play, which solved a huge problem in older editions. The problem of finding enough reliable players to get past level 3. It also fine tuned a lot of things and made death a lot less common and arbitrary. Like the fact that it wasn't hard to die from falling off a horse at level one. I'd much prefer the books being a little bare-bones over having to spend a month learning lore just to have your wizard die because they tripped and fell off the sidewalk on to a thorn bush.
@Harlems_Chambers11 місяців тому
I get your point and you are right, its certainly easier for beginners, but pathfinder I believe has better content and is more fun for veteran dnd players
@robinmohamedally758711 місяців тому
DM'ed a 3.5 edition module for a group that included two 5th edition players, their first time with 3.5. Nobody died, but when i ran the module how it was supposed to be run, and they rushed into an ADMITTEDLY ON THEIR PART obvious trap and nearly died, i got called a "killer DM" by one of the two 5th players and the other one whined that the SIXTH level bad guy could cast a SECOND level spell on his summoned monster. Soft-ass babies. Also, 3.5 isn't that hard if you're not brain-damaged. The hard edition is 2nd. That was the first one I played. THAT one, you could die at a moment's notice. You'd have to be......"special".....to die quickly in third edition.
@robinmohamedally758711 місяців тому
oh shit, i just looked it up. Cause Fear is a FIRST level spell, not second. LOL. Git gud.
@CrizzyEyes9 місяців тому
I'm sorry, but you lost me when you implied that the rules for Vampire are more convoluted than D&D, one of the most numbers-heavy crunch games out there, with a system for magic that is totally silo'd off from the rest of the rules. It's honestly amazing that D&D is seen as the norm for tabletop RPGs. Dice pools are way simpler and more consistent than a typical d20 game. Yes, even 5th edition. You're also a bit misinformed when it comes to earlier editions. Dying immediately at 0 HP hasn't been a thing since base 3rd edition, which most people agree sucked even among D&D fans. On 3.5 going forward, falling off your horse at level 1 would result in you at worst falling unconscious but any healing would be able to save you.
@Sinsults9 місяців тому
@@CrizzyEyes If I lost you at the end of the second sentence then I have nothing to say to you. Maybe get un-lost and read the rest of my comment. I won't be able to tell, however, as you lost me at "you lost me when", so I won't be reading any more of what you have to say. Really don't feel like listening to your opinion on an table top rpg when you can't read two sentences without giving up.