Chris Kaye it is in this UKposts circle

its all one things like skill share now. good video now i know why my shiny leather couch came out so bad.. time to find a statue.

ok

Do u think able to 3D scan the lift/elevator ?

I was the 666th like

it definitely wont work with a budget computer like you featured XD i had a hard time with my i7 4790k 16gig of ram and a gtx 1060 turbo (6gigs) i'll give a try with the non cuda version of Colmap ... maybe the 1060 is just not enough

In theory it should just affect how long it takes, if you are patient you could do this with a very basic computer.

Try 3DF Zephyr free. It does all the things in the video but in one tool. Much easier to use as well. Free is caped at 50 photos.

how to install colmap??

Bonjour 🤝 Excellent travail bravo 👏 et merci 🙏

it's what i have been already using for YEARS!!!! ukposts.info/have/v-deo/sWZ8hqycbYSAoqc.html there are so many iOS apps out there since 2012 already... how this complicated method is better? I don't know!

yeah but it doesn't come out too good now does it??

@@honestview quality

Cheesecake This seems like a cool idea. Easy to execute in other software too if you can find a way to slice a video into frames (ffmpeg can do it I think). Question is, would the resulting scans be feasible to process on an average desktop PC... I imagine they would have a LOT of points.

Videos are more compressed then video, and also have rolling shutter and motion blur. You can render our individual frames with quick time or vdub easily.

3DF Zephyr is probably the most feature filled and user friendly photogrammetry software out there. Also completely free for a 50 photos and less if anyone wants to learn. I train all my students on Zephyr, definitely my recommendation!

not only is video compressed intra-frame, but it is usually less than half of the resolution of the sensor ... ig you have a phone, you can take really crisp photos, but a FHD video is still just above 1 megapixel while a frame from a 4k video is just under 5 MP ... let that sink in

можно ли использовать зефир для съёмки предметов (товары для интернет-магазина) ?

and repeat :)

That would actually be an interesting experiment (or art project) - you could observe and measure the losses between each step.

Juho Leiniö 3D inception! :D

Repeat that enough times and you'd probably just end up with a blob, lol.

The perfect lesson as video was intended.

in 3d graphics modeling is only 30% time And even with scan u can give a lot problems! For me faster create by hand this model than dancing with tambourines and recive some models which not good editable

You can use Make Human which is a free app for creating random human models and try to recreate yourself

Dog #2 Full Body scanned 3d model www.desirefx.me/dog-2-full-body-scanned-3d-model/

No, this is photogrammetry since it’s still camera shots meshed together thru data points to generate a model... the structures he shot were never in any motion

That is true, BUT a solid background makes it harder for the program to figure out the position of the camera, so in some cases the background helps in the process Often it is recommended to put the scanned object on a newspaper or similar to get more reference points in the images

And I was sitting here like, "where do they find all these beats". To each their own.

The common reason you find background music that is a bit too loud in relation to the speech is because people don't have professional facilities and tons of editing time to record their voice overs, so the music hides the annoying background noise - the microphone and preamp hiss, the computer rumble and fan noise, the furniture noises, breathing and mouth sounds, the gargling sound of noise suppression plug-in...

As somebody who suffers from cochlear synaptopathy, I struggle to hear the narration in videos like this with loud background music.

I quite liked the music. No issues with the volume either.

That depends if you have 3D sculpting skills. You can't fault photogrammetry for it's sheer accuracy in capturing objects, even if the topology isn't the greatest. There's a difference between knowing how to use zBrush and being able to replicate an object exactly without letting artistic influence interfere. I think a pipeline of photogrammetry data with alterations from a sculptor is likely to be the way forward.

i see it as with motion capture. you can get insane level of detail but cleanup can be a bit of a nightmare and always needed. as with all 3d sculpting it depends on what the end product is going to be.

Well, you can also paint a photorealistic image in photoshop from scratch, but taking a photo as a first step is usually faster.

@@kpbendeguz that said, photogrametry is not good enough yet for a lot of things (for the video exemple for instance it was easier to just sculpt )

Yes, but it is amazing what you can do with photogrammetry in the case of environmental preservation. Photogrammetry used as a means to give a virtual tour of historical places would be less impressive, had they only been sculpted. That's not to say that skilled sculptors wouldn't be able to do something similar, but it's not quite the same, is it?

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aXRheZ6KoGOn15c.html ;)

What is the alternative to point clouds?

well when i used to use laser scanning and some photogrammetry software would save out with point clouds. and then you would have to find some good software that can convert point clouds into decent models. takes a lot of messing about to get the models perfect. but now i just use autodesk recapPhoto its one the best photogrammetry software i have used. it will load in your photos up to the cloud work the models and save them out as a complete model. no faffing about with the point clouds the software works well. :) its not more an alternative. its more down to not having to mess about with other software. give it a try. you can get a trial version. other software i have used is reality capture. this is an awesome software but you have to pay monthly to use it as its not aimed at the home market. :( some of us just model for fun. check out the software on steam. "Reality Capture"

I suppose it's still point cloud based internally though, just auto tunes the extraction parameters and thus doesn't have to give you the raw data set. I thought you implied the world has moved on to some principally new surface extraction method that I somehow wasn't aware of, and thankfully it has not. There were non point cloud based methods before, where you explicitly specify vertices and span a mesh from them, and if you specify extra data like surface angles and measured lengths, you could sometimes perform reconstruction from just one or two photographs rather than from dozens. Also surface properties were irrelevant. But it really only made sense for very low poly objects.

yea everything is still point based. but it just cuts down the work. :) always a plus. :)

Leave it under a tree and wait for birds to take a dump on it. Should generate enough features for scanning.

Sure, you can! Though it's worth mentioning that most photogrammetry scans require at least a little bit of clean up before printing. Some areas might need smoothing and the poly-count can be very high.