Also t-62s were introduced in 60s, not 40s

Yeah, most people seem to ignore those facts,

...clever misinformation : talking about the ability of the T 14 to dominate on the battle fields, but in the same time production capacity in question, army disorganized and not motivated, according to the ISW, a neo-con think tank, created for the purpose of downing grade the possible adversary...

Cope, russia is not using T62s for indirect fire, entire battallions armed with them have been wiped out in Kherson. Russia is using old tanks to fill gaps

@@freedomordeath89 stop watching CNN or the BBC, they reduce intelligence and degrade IQ levels. 🤔

You saw a video. LOL.

And you are a Russian stooge.

Source: I saw a video

Instead of giving us the correct informations, he distorted it to make it look like Russia is totally bad at everything ... there is a video here on UKposts of ISIS firing anti tank missiles at T-90 tank, the tank continue moving after it got hit

Russia has less than 10 modern tanks and less than 8 operational su57. Very weak when u consider little Ukraine has pushed back russian invaders with a few supplies from 5 nato countries

OfFeNsSiVe FaIlEd CuZ lInEs DoN't ChAnGe On ThE mAp WhIcH uSeS rUsSiAn SoUrCeS aS sAfEtY mEaSuRe

bro everyone on youtube is cringe regarding whats happening. they all tow the party line lol you just get used to it

@@winnah2314 yep I'm just watching

@@jerrymoore7817 russia lost 12% of the 30% in a year, is that winning?

@@phantom1021 And according to what sources exactly?

Indirect fire, that’s all

Exactly just making them guns for the defense. It's really smart actually infantry platoon or infantry platoon with 125mm gun support

​@@YankeeVatnik1917copium

All tanks are platforms. You don't design something to last only 2 years unless it's a consumer product lol.

​@@YankeeVatnik1917 por ser o melhor tem a Rússia tem mais tempo a Rússia usado todo tipo tanques e não e capaz de ocupar Ucrânia todos javalis que atingiu T 90 ou T 80 estão feitos em ferro velho a Rússia não é capaz de entrar na Ucrânia Himar atingiu T 90 ficou peças tem vários vídeos no UKposts

just look for ur self @ the special operation ...

What is Kyiv doing…you already made it possible to capture it 😂…just saw all the Ruskie equipment litter the streets but you didn’t make it, Vatnik loser!

Да давно... Уже воюет просто его мало среди западных танков поставленных для ВСУ

What you write is absolutely correct, but does not necessarily have to lead to questioning EVERYTHING. But you are absolutely right with your comment!

@@h.-u.spengler6366 Point well-taken. Thank you.

My thoughts exactly. Probably still lives with mom and dad.

I agree with you, it was just a propaganda video.

and to add the note that he labeld the T-62 as a T-55 and Visa Versa

Betul

M1ABRAMS

Russia needs a new President. It's gonna loose.

​@@williamzk9083дегенерат,это тебе нужна сиделка,а то ты серешь под себя а убрать некому😂

Your country is FOS. You economy is destroyed. Your per capita income is one seventh the per capita income of the USA.

Yes, and as additional artillery... 120mm shells are big enough and can do a lot of damage.

@@ozymandiasultor9480they are using old tanks due to reverse technology

T14 has engine problems, the optics for the driver are lame and standard, if the gun gets jamed it’s difficult to clear. The concept is good the problem is in the implementation. Germany’s PUMA IFV has an unmanned turret.

Tank on tank combat was never a thing...in the sense that it was avoided unless no other option was possible. Most tank loses in history was Tank vs Anti-Tank (mines, AT guns, Infantry AT weapons)

@@AleksandarLomovic I would say that the design of the T-14, as with most tanks is to overcome other tanks. Certainly, they will spend much of their time in infantry support. Maybe, sometime acting like artillery for indirect support. But their main purpose is to fight other tanks. That's why I said there has really not been a good time to use them thus far. You need a much more mobile scenario when the tanks can come together head to head. And with the way war is changing, as we see in this war, we may be returning to WWI rather than WWII situations.

@@williamzk9083 So when you were testing it did you find the engine power was good? He declares here it is between 1500 and 2000 horse power....just wondering if the let you drive it when you were testing the gun ? and if so is there anything more than "lame" as a description.

@@TP-ie3hj The T-14 Amata is a half baked POS at this time. It’s not coming from me. Russians know this them selves. If they produced it, the T-14 would be a maintenance nightmare consuming enormous resources and it wouldn’t have the desired affect of being superior in anyway because of its many flaws and bugs. I suspect there’s another for five years of work on this and that they may even have to start again because it will be out of date by the time it’s ready

Можно с Россией дружить, если такие как Путин не будут сидеть в троне президента.

@@alexandrastanaev4399 пошел на хер с такой дружбой!!!

@@alexandrastanaev4399Если Путин не будет там сидеть, а будет кто-то типа Горбачёва или Ельцина, как хотят враги России, то со страной будут "дружить" как в 90-е годы прошлого века: превратят её в колонию и сырьевой придаток Запада с голодающим и вымирающим населением. Мы это уже проходили и 2-й раз на те же грабли не наступим. Хуже вражды с западными странами может быть только "дружба".

​@@alexandrastanaev4399 Путин/не Путин - это не имеет абсолютно никакого значения. Никто с Россией никогда не дружил, не дружит и дружить не будет (за некоторыми исключениями). Пора бы уже урапатриотам зарубить сей факт у себя на носу.

@@zahinho9519 я так не думаю. Если бы проклятые американцы помогли бы белогвардейцам на полную, то с Россия была бы страной получше. Потом украинцы будут так же злы на США, как и я и другие люди, обиженные на весь мир.

Because every potential buyer of Russian military hardware tested and denied buying the tank. Both India and China didnt want to purchase the tank. The tank was made in 2014 and is still yet only a "prototype" as Russia is not buidling them in a large quantity. Either because its to expensive, not reliable enough or/and Russia is lacking parts to actually produce them.

Because it's Russian, it must be bad, for propaganda reason alone. Just like everything coming from the West is insta "the best ever", that end up being destroyed somewhere just the same. When you see "Putin's" in the title instead of "Russia's" - you already know what kind of garbage is coming.

@@NaV3P I've read that the general testing and refinement period for Russian tanks is 10 years.

​@@aaaaaa2206some things with countries like the US

@@NaV3P sanctions played a huge role in that

You are such a clumsy liar.

Carl Gustav is not a top attack weapon. The Bofors Bill is.

So dont buy a ruzzian tank unless you want to use it as a novelty BBQ!

Battle too unfair they have to give their tank to their enemy

Ukraine did not buy tanks from Russia LOL. After the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine sold Soviet tanks to the United States for military testing. And this is a real betrayal on their part.

It's also full of a lot of I saw on a video a "T90 took 19 hits and continued" and I saw on a video "T90 destroyed 3 Leopard, 2 Bradley" and a "Ka 52 deflected 18 missiles". The videos are always edited and stitched together. If a tank is destroyed its already immobilized long ago.

The technology is most definitely 1940s.

We never said they are invincible. Also, those Leopards may be destroyed, but the crews survive to fight another day

I call BS !! You should go fight for Russia since you are so confident !! I bet you don't have the balls keyboard warrior !!

Failed, against those old tanks no lol. Tanks no matter what not invinca le and the mines and arty took them out not Russian tanks lmao..😅 facts are fun.

@@geoffreydunne7422 the crew is more important than the tank. There is a reason why the Sherman is touted as the best WWII tank because it was a very survivable tank, while the T-34 was called Crematorium for 4 comrades. Guess where they put the fuel tanks on the T-34. While the Sherman as I said earlier was highly survivable which also resulted in no tank crews deaths

@@Sp00kyV0id - Have you seen Bradley Square? The crews didn't survive.

so fucken true

Well those "experts" were usually journalists, as real military experts said that while Russian army was less professional than US army they could and would adapt fast if Ukraine did not use well their time and momentum.

@@tiagodagostini Well the Russian army don't seem to be "adapting" all that fast, as they still appear to be making the same tactical mistakes they were making 2 years ago......

Без танков в пехотных боях пока никуда, даже с учётом появившихся дронов

Indeed. Wait till Abrams arrive in Ukraine and are taken out by anti-tank mines, artillery and drones. It will happen you can count on it.

That is true for any weapon or armor and for every country

To your point if one is damaged, abandon or destroyed it will give the West a look at them. And that means all the Russian propaganda was a lie as per usual. Russians always over hype their equipment and once captured and are looked at their found to be less than advertised.

Theyre saving them for the worst case scenario, total war between Russia and nato

Dawg think for a second and use your brain. I'm Russian by the way. its because we prefer to keep them on stock to have a large range of T-14's against literally thirty one countries to take on that is united to just counter 1. (Which is embarassing but whatever we don't talk about that) Why use modern technologies on a ex soviet country we're fine with the equipment that we pulled out the most like T-72's, TOS-1, Tornado G, KA-50, Tiger Kornet, BMP-1, BMP-2.

@@Sil-zx OK makes sense. That way if Nato tries to jump in you have your best guns waiting for them.

@@joeylopez7978 Yeah technically. NATO and Russia hasn't sent their best weapons in Ukraine. Are you inside the NATO alliance?

самым главным козырем является то,что армата не видима🤣🤣ее ни кто ни когда не видел😂😂😂👍

@@maks8105 я бы сказал, как и контрнаступа, но мы все знаем, что это не так😉

@@VASYA_V0R0N что за контрнаступ? 🤔чей херсон?🤣🤣

​@@maks8105they will see early !

​@@maks8105а ты подумай почему он ваш или слишком глупый ? а нуда украинцы не умеют думать, размышлять

Only because the russian forces dug in. Russia is being forced to fight in trenches its laughable that russia claims to be effective despite being stomped in ukraine. 🤣

@@skullduggery7917 It isnt getting stomped just today the ukrainaians forces in Zaporozhian front and have the Ukrainians circled in Robotyne . The ukronazi are losing just like Germany in WW2 slowly but surely

@@City1Tiger a day later, what you stated is already established as false. No surprise

@@vme1111 It isnt false

@@City1Tiger haha you loser ;) what is Wagner doing by the way…oh wait Putin got issues ;)

They are not. The Russian-Ukrainian war is a huge joke. None of the sides have any normal tactics. Otherwise tanks are very effective platforms.

@@newkillaaa4934 They are big expensive coffins on wheels with a gun.

They are not obsolete. You dont know how it works, kid

@@gook5219 Drones and AT missiles can easily destroy a tank 100x their price. Tanks are as obsolete now as knights were in the 17th century - there is still some use for them, but they're too expensive and being replaced by new technology.

​@@newkillaaa4934indeed. A normal attack would have air support, or at least something like Gepard or anything with armored chassis and Oerlikon autoturret to put down the drones

Yeah or unicorn in North-Korea

Pray you never get to see it.

Dumb ass that is true for any tank lol get with the program

Nice! Best comment on thread.

Cry

there crap

They will see it when will be too late ! 😂😂😂

T-14 is way more rare. Tiger 2s saw a decent amount of combat. And the T-90 and the rarer M variant are also pretty common in Ukraine

@@uraninite8151 Tiger was made of shit and sticks so it was incapable to change anything

Well, we tried three Abrams, but didn’t even get to the armata.

Where's the challenger btw? Pretty sure the media says it will roll the rus defense like a hot knife through butter. Is it equipped with super advanced alien stealth tech or something? Because it's invisible. Unlike the T14 which has been seen in combat.

@@far_centrist T14 never been seen in combat. Been seen on the parade ground, where it broke down!

we just waiting to most performed cringe game changer abrams to come over ukraine

Just like the UK challenger 2s. As soon as the images of burning Leopard 2s started coming out the British government told the Ukrainians not to use it on the front lines, 🤣.

Western leaders said the same thing about Avangad and other new weapons of Russia and laughed. But when this weapon was shown in real tests, the West was not laughing. Same thing with you.

maybe they have 100..

Congratulations on the mince of the first three Abrams!

You may be right that that's if the T-14 doesn't break down on the way to the Barbed Wire.

@@stunick1573 🌈aw, you two are soulmates 🏳‍🌈

@@Conserpov Yeppers, you caught us out!! But the facts are the Armata is still crappy. Until and unless Russia dusts it off and uses it which they wont.

@@stunick1573 Nothing to see here, just a Lib coping.

yes. i agree. lets get rid of the rest of russias tanks.

Houti rebels have no issues destroying the Abrams, If cave dwellers can destroy them, russia won’t have any problems

From the performance of the Leopard tanks and the Bradleys Bradleys, western junk will perform badly. Cv90 is already in the hands of the Russians.

​@@justme-ud2vkcopium, your leo boys isnt get to the frontline to fire a single shot, couple vd show leo have been destroy by T-80 and T-72 using ATGM and your leo boy isnt see a shit to fire

the reason why leo buring beacuse anglos duped idiot sulz with abrams and challenger2

A10 would get shot down as soon as it took off in this war.

A10 is slow as shit😂 it would get instantly shot down😂 this ain’t the taliban buddy this is a real army

Turret is unmanned, a small target, and only protected from autocannons and missiles through APS but easily replaceable. Tank is impenetrable on its hull though, meaning it can simply roll out of a fight once its turret is compromised and have it easily swapped out. Actually quite a forward design

The lack of armor also makes the turret lighter, again easier to replace. Things like sabot will go through the other side doing less damage to structure and no crew casualties

_> what i see the armor in turret is a thin layer of iron metal._ What I see in this comment is elementary school dropout 🤦

@@Conserpov so your telling me its made of like abrams tank has? you sure?

@@TindahanPampalipasOras Do you also think that mudguards are too thin? It's not armor. Armor is inside. Go outside and touch grass.

they already set up a mental decoy, and your meager brain bought into it. You are a Nazi, if you support the genocidal Nazis who rule in Kiev.

The only jamming going on is of the NATO F-35 fighter jet 😉

The T14's turret can't pop off, because the autoloader is in the turret itself, not in the main body of the tank beneath it. It's designed so that if the turret gets penetrated and the autoloader blows up, the crew will remain protected even if the turret is destroyed

@@nathangamble125 Yes, the Russian's who are notorious for caring zero for crew safety/comfort made a tank that magically shields the crew from the equivalent of a 2000lb bomb. Makes sense.

​@@nathangamble125do your homework bud. It doesn't matter where the auto loader is, it's where the ammo is stored, and it's stored in the same spot that it is on the T90 which is what makes the turret enter orbit when it's hit. Same ole same ole.

@@cvrbon6 crew safety. Do you know what happens if m1a is hit? Turrets stays in place because it's too heavy to pop. but the crew is dead 99%. Stop watching TV

@@Galova I don't watch TV, I just fully grasp tank design. The autoloader of Russian tanks means if they're hit it goes boom, along with the crew. Whereas the Abrams stores ammo behind the crew in the back of the turret. Where there's a BLOWOUT PANEL MORON. Read a book.

"Looks" being the operative word. It's a glorified T-90 with a couple systems swapped out.

How many tanks did they hit so far in the entire conflict? 10? Go outside and touch grass

You do realize that the Javelin's performance was abysmally and that there's a big shortage of them (i.e., they're out of them). This is not Kremlin propaganda, it's been well reported by western media like Wall Street Journal etc.

That is the estimated current position.....

That would be my best answer

So provide a link. UKposts allows links to other youtube channels.

@@williamzk9083 You really haven't seen the video? Google it - it's all over the place.

Successfully fight??? The Russians??? What war are you watching 😂 😂 😂

"Thinner armor" is not always automatically worse armor... RUSSIA has the appropriate raw material resources to work with much stronger metals (titanium?) in combination with other lighter composites in order to achieve these very good core data (range, cross- country ability, maneuverability and armor) in the T-14 ARMATA.. . In contrast, the ABRAMS, CHALLENGER and the German LEOPARD are much too sluggish ... WHY is the West now so "worried" that the Ukrainian "counteroffensive" won't be successfully ended in time before autumn/winter? It is well known at NATO that the RUSSIANS get along very well with these times of the year, in contrast to the UKRAINIANS, whose weapon systems are pretty to look at, but which cannot be used in the cold seasons under real war conditions... We'll see it this winter, I'm absolutely convinced! In the spring of 2024 the situation will be completely different from what we are experiencing now and KOKAINSKY will wish he had offered the RUSSIANS peace negotiations...

Armour is gonna be obsolote. You need enough armour to stop 30-57mm rounds from an auto cannon,but against higher calibers/missiles you need something else in my opinion

Tanks are going the same way battle ships did obsolescence there is no such thing as an unstoppable tank military tech always changing the Russians better not put to much hope in this tank

@@jamesschenk Not the tanks,but most of the current ones are obsolote. Next generation is coming and electronical warfare gonna be crucial also defense systems...

Armata is the most armored of any tank in the world. It is built around surving AT weapons. Why? The turret is unmanned. It is only armored to stop autocannons or missiles through the APS but if damaged can merely be swapped out. The tank is not killed. The frontal armor of armata on the hull is better armored than any tank including Challenger. 900mm vs Kinetic, there's no other tanks with this on the hull. This means a hit armata can simply retreat once turret is breached by sabot and swap it out. It is the most protected tank of the modern era. People say armor is useless because every hull is currently outdated and obsolete for anything prior to armata and maybe Challenger 2 [which is still very old] No Challenger 2s have been knocked out on ukraine side. Lighter armored Leopards have. It is quite the contrary: armor and APS are more vital than ever.

Except, Russia isn't actually producing anywhere near that number. They produced 20 Armata over the last few years, and half of them are test models. Russia has one factory that builds its tanks, called UralVagonZavod, and its numbers are DRAMATICALLY inflated.

​@@theprogressivecynic2407Вы глупый

Видимо проблемы с производством поэтому их не видно

I wouls say that the T-14 is a Potemkin village. Made only to impress and nothing more

1 500 pound bomb case filled with concreate will knock it out. 10.000 feet drop. sure will.

@@georgecoons6872 And how will you get the bomber above the battle field threw the worlds most sophisticated and effective air defense system? 🧌

@@jayspik6498 the new american bomber can't be seen with the naked human eye. . Anyway the F22 can get in and out. Thermite want a dandy.

@@georgecoons6872 I bet that clocking devices will work miracles.. So stop talking and send them in so we can see.. 😂

@@jayspik6498 won't see anything just explosions that make a Russian soldiers butthole tighten 50% more.

t-90m some orc clown direct made it 2 meter frontz armor : _ D

on wiki*

Russians wanna drive the Abrams. That is why the US is SCARED to send them to Ukraine LMAO gonna burn wonderfully like the expensive junk Bradleys

🤣😂🤣 Nice one!

Slava Ukraini

well, where is your "super tank" named T-84?

It's at best comparable to a 1st gen Abrams.

@@judahmac1799 Phahaha!! Armata is the best tank in the world, even new versions of Abrams are not good as Armata.

@@ozymandiasultor9480 the armata doesn't have anything that wasn't already present in western tanks for decades. Not to mention that there's only like 8 ever built so even if they're the best tanks in the world, and precision airstrike or fire mission would wipe out their entire fleet.

That's why they're taking them back to Russia . It's a POS !!

@@ozymandiasultor9480challenger 3 and germanys new tank puma f51 is will actually be used in the battlefields

Oh no another ukrainian game changer, Russia should collapse in the next hour 🤙🏻

The name could prove to be prophetic. Perhaps the Russian Armata will go the same way as the Spanish Armada.

If it not fails. 45% hit rate according to Ukraine 😂

Although most Russian tanks are sh*t boxes.

Russia isnt like America. It is we Americans that have been raped by our rich for decade aftter decade in imperialist wars to gain more power for international oligarchs. 33 trillion in debt, and still too fucking stupid to get what that means? Drink more flouride.

Any soldier will tell you that tanks and artillery do 90% of the killing. Tanks are ultimately a weapon which can be destroyed. Additionally every tanks armor and aps save the T14 in the modern era is outdated and insufficient against modern AT. Too much design focus on other things but survivability

Сам не понимаю, зачем так раздувают существование этого танка, если значительная часть запчастей на него поставлялась из других стран. Их выпущено пару десятков, и то, они являются опытными образцами, которые сложны в эксплуатации из-за сложности компоновки двигателя, поэтому и выбрали более стабильный Т90М, но выпуск его менее 20 экземпляров в месяц. Да и смысла танков на поле боя становится все меньше. С задачей маневренных наступлений справляются бронемашины, те же Брэдли, они же способны эффективно уничтожать и танки, на днях было видел, где Брэдли 1 на 1 уничтожил т90м, уничтожив приводы наводки и заставив выйти экипаж. Что то я переразмышлялся. В общем, верьте не тому, что говорят политики, а что говорят толковые военные обозреватели и очевидцы..

@@SeaCatty Tanks will always have their place, but in this particular conflict a 2 man anti-tank team with ATGM, drone, and off road motorcycle is more mobile and costs A LOT less than a tank and it's "highly" trained crew. High speed and high mobility is what is effective on the muddy and forested terrain of this battlefield. The 2 men shoot and scoot before any one notices where the shot came from. This tactic is enhanced by the recon info a drone can provide so hit and run is even faster or dropping a grenade from the drone onto the tank to soften them up before ATGM strikes. What will win this war is logistics, attrition, and the will of those fighting.

​@@airgunbubba2505 Огромное влияние на ведение боевых действий является "крепость" экономики, и сейчас у нас она трещит по швам из-за многих факторов, например: в конце прошлого года приняли бюджет на ведение боевых действий 11 триллионов рублей(сами пересчитайте в доллары), и при этом, в конце года в экономику были закинуты огромные деньги, для закрытия дыр(Фонд народного благосостояния, то есть копилка на черный день). Этих денег в фонде осталось на 1 раз, а доходов, что бы эти деньги не использовать становится все меньше и меньше, к тому же, цена на нефть "Urals" стала около 62$ , но в документации, для того , что бы бюджет не был в пи@де, цена должна быть не менее 70. И недавно, 12 января, произошла авария на НПЗ НОРСИ Лукойла(там была добыча нефти и переработка, что то вроде того), она составляла около 12% со всей России. Это произошло из-за нехватки сложных механизмов и деталей из Германии, США и тд. Что бы с иностранной стороны думали, что санкции не работают, с бюджета сливают огромные средства для стимулирования. Не слушайте эти высказывания "России санкции ни по чем". Загуглите, в регионах России жители замерзают из-за сломанных котельных, в квартирах до +6 доходит(когда на улице до -30, а то и холоднее). Это происходит по всей россии, но может кроме Москвы. Бесят ваши газеты. Если вы можете в UKposts сделать англ субтитры, то советую посмотреть на канале "Майкл Наки" экономическую сводку с Владимиром Миловым, название "Новый бензиновый кризис. Инфляция разгоняется. Тотальный кадровый голод. Кремль расходует ФНБ. Милов". В европе Милов очень даже известен. Надеюсь прочитаете :)

true... it's the lancet

New tanks are being tested on the battlefield. That's what it means and nothing more. Don't post nonsense here.

Nonsense you posted

It only means that Russia is testing its weapons. Russia doesn't need to change the game, thus it has no need for the "game changer". Unlike the other side of the conflict, which can't shut up about "game changers".

Wrong. T80's got pulled out from the grave and a bunch of modernized T72B3M and T90M got deployed in Ukraine

Just where and when did you see this new tank in action??

"Russians because of their Russo phobic mindsets". You make it sound like there is something wrong with "Russo phobia". After invading Georgia, Moldova, Chechnya. After threatening various small countries of the world with invasion. After a long history of imperialist rule and oppression and assassination, after a long history of manufactured genocides and famines (especially in Ukraine), after the development of Ruski Mir neo Nazis you think people should think people shouldn't fear you? That they should respect you? That after jailing journalists and citizens for calling a war a war your country deserves respect? How about having a President for 20 years? Or being a corrupt country? You DESERVE russo phobia. Take some responsibility.

Cope harder.

@@nathangamble125 Troll 🧌 better..

Чё клоун,смешно?

​@@user-xg4lw1zo6ybroke Russian nigguh