Now just waiting for all out war and prices to drop

Here here!

Right

Can't wait. Tired of apple getting so much their their A series processors.

I want to see what qualcomm makes next till now their chips have not been able to compete with Apple, but with this move they just might become as competent as Apple at making ARM chips.

Cores 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Holy FinFET

@@nicholasscafe holy high-k-metal gate. 😂

Wtffff

🤣🤣👏👏

Intel: no no no no no no no.... No!!!

AMD has been developing their ARM chip for years. I get the feeling the only reason they're not announcing it yet is because their x86 chips are still selling really well. They'll probably wait a few more years before revealing their ARM stuff.

Isnt the microsoft ARM chip coengineered with AMD already?

First microsoft needs to launch a Arm version of windows

No they will jump to risc

@@adityajadhav3045 They did so long ago

Imagine all the talents quit immediately on acquisition, and then form a new company again!!

Well technology has a way of trickling down to the Mobile Sector so even of they develop Server Chips they can use some strategies from the Server division in the mobile division.

That's exactly what Gary said in the video

Microsoft buying Nintendo 🤔

@@darkerm76 I would really love to see Nvidia push Nintendo to make a proper ultra powerful console, I'm thinking Apple like design but much more powerful, more cores and RTX graphics!

@@darkerm76 why you want the nintendo to go to hell 🥺

Intel buying MediaTek.

@@wvv3758 I would doubt it, MediaTek only just acquired Intel’s Enpirion Power Solutions business for $85 million in November.

And Samsung making qualcomm cpus

@@triforceparas5658 next time who knows Samsung gonna make it or not...maybe tsmc or maybe samsung

And this when Samsung stupidly shut down their custom cpu division entirely. Custom cpus were not the issue. The custom large cores were. The regular customized arm cores were previously superior. And even the failed large cores were going to see improvements. And even then the failure needed different management and expectations to fix them. Not killing it

@@VibezVideo obviously not. And everything i said was fact. Their previous regular custom cores were one of the things that always made the exynos overall more powerful and efficient. Why it used to be ahead. Which means many years, lots of money, and lots of effort were well put into their cpu division long before the custom large cores of the past couple years. And there are always hurdles when creating large custom cores. Apple even struggled for at least a couple years to keep them more in check. Less oven like and more efficient. Plus clearly by the results the issue was not just being early into new designing, but clearly being pushed to chase numbers. High clock rates and most of all benchmark scores. Not efficiency. Which has to do with higher up demands. So it's not the cpu division or design team that was the biggest issue. It was retarded ceos and decision makers looking for unrealistic results. Especially during such a fragile process. And despite all that some progress was made with the cores and more would have been. Just made it take longer. Thus meaning that the last couple years was not the colossal waist of money and time. Stupidly closing it all down and throwing all the work, money, effort, and time from the past decade down the drain over it was what made it a colossal waist of time and money.

@@jackskellington9570 So, to make that assumption you must know what was happening behind the scenes at the Samsung Austin R&D Center, right? For Samsung to make that decision themselves, that means they did it knowing full well that things weren't working the way they expected at SARC. Their engineering team was comprised of people behind failed cpu designs like amd's bulldozer and Excavator cores which were more power hungry than power efficient and those failed designs dripped their failures in Samsung's custom cores. Samsung let them go because it most probably wasn't working anymore for them and for other reasons unknown to everyone outside of Samsung themselves.

Still no CPUs from Qualcomm

And unfortunately what they have done is the opposite. The recent move has only balanced them out. But eliminated flexibility and progress. Unless they reopen a custom core division again.

I was about to say the same thing 👍

Afterall Adreno was AMD venture

Panthers love AMD

Yes cpu boost is qualcomm what qualcomm need the most, can't wait what will it bring.

@beserk lee Wakanda forever

No worries. General Tso Joe is coming to save humanity 😉

No problem bruhh Samsung f*** both with AMD collaboration

@@kcsbalaji3527 Hahaha good joke

@@Ignacio.Romero I hope nd let's see dude what happens

Same , that's what I also felt . Qualcomm would be a force to be reckoned with.

@@kcsbalaji3527 qcom uses Amd ip in their gpus.

8086 is seeing its twilight, finally!

If risc v gained traction significantly in near future then Arm will have to faced steep competition and it may lost probably .

Exynos is not a company, is a brand, Samsung Electronics is the company. And xiaomi dropped their SoC businesses. There is also Hisilicon Unisoc Rockchip Amlogic Allwinner Realtek Ampere Marvell to name a few

@@dreamzbg9477 I know Exynos is Samsung-owned... So you know things, thanks for letting us know... And of course I forgot ARM names, but was it necessary to say them all to get the point?

But the ARM isa is owned by a single company, so it's a monopoly all the same. If Nvidia gets their way and buys ARM, they'll have way too much power on their hands. At least when it comes to x86, AMD and Intel have a good competition going for them. But Nvidia will get the whole ARM pie and I don't think that's good for the industry.

@FichDich InDemArsch You dare to ask that question?!? :D

@FichDich InDemArsch Jim keller is a guy who moves from company to company taking big projects and completing them successfully. Yeah, he was the ceo/cfo or in high positions in many companies including amd, tesla, apple. Basically, he's a legend in the silicon industry.

Hope that was the case, but it's not happening Buy their is some rumor about amd development of arm chip

AMD already make Arm chips.

@@GaryExplains yeah and people forget qcoms gpu is based on Amd tech and ip 😂

@@ashishpatel350 It was based on AMD's tech 10 years ago, not now. 10 years is a long time in tech.

@@GaryExplainsthere are some rumor that amd have a successor to k12, and It is in phototype stages

Yes absolutely correct 👍🏻😎

So m1 to everyone. This is the best time for consumers

A positive Hope 🤞

Lol thought the same

The architecture revision number is important, but not as important as other aspects of the CPU design. The A14 or the M1 aren't fast because they implement ARMv8.4.

Wrong this started low key in 2018 with qualcom and MS..every fanboy think the apple does everything..this would have happened even without M1..it was on the roadmap like 6 years before M1

@@Teluric2 Apple's history with ARM goes back to the Newton, the first Apple device to use ARM. Apple then used ARM in iPod in 2001 and then eventually iPhone in 2007. The first Apple developed ARM chip was the A4 from the iPad and later iPhone 4 in 2010. The chip in the Mac Mini Developer Transition Kit used the A12Z chip, an iPad Pro chip. That would later turn into the M1 chip. Also, by 2018, there were already lots of rumors of Apple ditching Intel for their own developed processors, and the rumor became true 2 years later in 2020. I almost forgot to mention that Apple also acquired PA Semi in 2008. So yeah, Apple's path to M1 began way before you believe.

Me too bro 😀😝😁

Soo true

No competion is key to prevent stagnation

enjoy now the crappy 5nm from samsung

NVidia: Don’t forget to pay us your royalties for all your ARMs.

Apple is migrating to ARM, this guy designed their processor for that: m1 ... do those count as "workstations"?

@@petersilva037 yes, as soon as i can run Linux on it :-)

Depends what you mean by "open source". Only the ISA is open source.

@@GaryExplains yes but atleast ISA is open-source unlike Arm where it does charges millions of dollar with too much legal stuff, terms and conditions.

@@yash_kambli Considering that you needs hundreds of millions of dollars to design and manufacture a competitive CPU then that isn't as relevant as you imply.

No one "has the fab". All these companies including AMD, Apple, Qualcomm use third parties to manufacture the chips.

Err.. all of them use Samsung and TSMC for the fabs.

I mean Apple gas reserved 100% capacity of TSMC's 3nm for an undisclosed period of time & 80% of 5nm fab until this year. Others will share 20% capacity, making me predict om 2 years Apple will kill Nvidia, AMD, Intel, Qualcomm (meaning go the way of Cyrix & 3DFX- Apple won't use their 3rd-party GPUs anymore coz' they're putting everything in SOC- expect Macs this year with the SSD even in SOC- so very fast:-) coz' they won't have 3nm in time (Samsung will create it's own but it'll be an inferior 3nm fab) indefinitely coz' 3nm may be the last size as the industry can't do 1nm (quantum problems). I expect 3nm Macbooks at the end of the year, 3nm iPhones next year:-) making it thinner, less to make, lighter, less heat (less material- lighter, cheaper to make again, lighter to ship)- will kill IBM's server market as well by 2023. I see Apple launching their servers as satellites like Starlink in 2023 for their own Apple Maps imaging (one of the applications) & iCar 2024 most likely launch using ISRO (cheaper launches than SpaceX). 21st century will be amazing- thanks Elon Musk for accelerating everything:-)

Intel already has a chip using the BIG.little tech.

Yeah and Nivia is really good at CPU designs.

@@asandax6 lmao

🤣

He basically took Apple's IP started a rival company and within a year sold that company for 1.4 Billion. People are just buying Apple IP for 1.4 Billion. Surprised Apple didn't give him the money just to retire instead.

More like the ARM wrestling begin 😉

I wish I had made a video about that...wait... I did... ukposts.info/have/v-deo/eWSVrnpwhaqlo3U.html