Glad you enjoyed it!

I agree with you. I never had either.

That was very cool. I assume the constant squidgy noises were the attitude thrusters and their valves. If felt like I was fhere. SciFi movies should use this soundtrack. Thanks for posting. 👍

Outstanding👍🏼🇺🇸👍🏼

@@RetroJackmost flat Earthers are bubble biters 😳🙊😳

Guess we know why flying saucers make all those whacky noises in the movies haha, literally what we heard the entire first few minutes, neatt

Yeah, but why the added soundtrack in the background before it hit the atmosphere? That wasn't machinery sounds...

The vfx artists seem to have forgotten to add all of the giant land masses of the earth

WHAT DID YOU WANT TO SAY? ЧЕГО ХОТЕЛ СКАЗАТЬ-ТО?

@@kob8634 you're delusional.

right!

And still the human brain is the most complex super computer.

they had computer navigation systems, infact they were invented for space travel

@@moe42oi prefer to be called a meat bag

@@BeansEnjoyer911 sounds like you need an attitude adjustment.

You sir are an NPC

@@itsresouling4117Baselessly repeating commonly used phrases verbatim is pretty npc if you ask me.

@@itsresouling4117 Yeah, what the guy above me said. The irony...

What's ironic is that the coolest footage outside of the planet is funded by the biggest d bag ON the planet

Wow-awesome! As a child of the 60s who watched all the Apollo re-entries, I’ve never seen it this way. What a treat! Really expected more plasma upon reentry. Amazingly quiet ride until it hit the atmosphere. Hearing RCS at work was interesting too. This is the closest I will ever get to experiencing re-entry. Thanks for the video.

Seemed like an awful lot of RCS work on initial entry profile. Maybe that’s expected but to me it looked like constant overcorrecting at some points

@@joefunk1611 Not an awful lot. It's indeed expected. Orion here is performing a "skip reentry" which is the very first time a human rated capsule has done this. In the past engineers couldn't really figure out a way to confidently pull it off, but technology has improved and this can be done now automatically without a crew as Orion here demonstrated. Imagine a stone being skipped on a puddle of water, well something similar is happening here. The exact burns have to be very precise and the RCS must be able to quickly adjust the orientation of the heatshield. For Apollo, the capsule would land several miles/km from their expected landing zones, which made recovery operations very difficult and they risked landing in an unsafe zone. The skip maneuver gives Orion much more control on where to land. This skip maneuver also eases reentry g-forces which should make the descent more comfortable for the astronauts.

@@jrc1606 thanks very much. Great explanation and now it makes sense. Gives a lot more confidence as I always thought the capsules shape was itself ‘self corrective’ but what you said really give some understanding and confidence I wasn’t feeling until now :).

​@@jrc1606I thought it looked like 2 separate entries! Thanks for the explanation

Exceedingly controlled, wait til the next version, can't wait to see what they come out with my gosh was that cool

skipping like a stone. because the earth is flat, like a pond.

Just leaving this here for the replies to bloke above this commnet.

@@_Rustodian Flat- like the mush where his cerebral cortex should be.

that is exactly what the gemini capsules would do during the apollo missions in the early 60's, nothing new

*Kyrie Irving has entered the chat*

@@LevelEarth2021 Moon only has different shape phases because the earth is a sphere. Moon is upside down in southern hemisphere vs the northern hemisphere. Planes have to adjust their flight path angle otherwise they would technically end up flying straight into space. These things are only possible on a spherical planet. Shush 🤡

Yeah it's called CGI... Just like everything these satanic scum show about Space

The left side of the Earth was flat for the first 4 minutes lmao

@@HappyGothGalthe earth is not a perfect sphere

Orion never enters low earth orbit after returning from lunar orbit. That’d require as much energy as the TLI in the first place, and is why the reentry speed is so insanely high.

I was wondering what was building up in the window, I thought it could be loose debris inside the capsule. Hard to imagine fragments of the heat shield laying on the outside of the window in such an extreme environment

@@braindare1351 interestingly, one of the reasons for Artemis 2 just having been postponed, is “unexpected erosion” of the ablative heat shield. Whether or not the debris seen on the window is a representation of that, I don’t know.

@@ArKritz84 excellent observation. Just my opinion but the failures of NASA go far deeper than a few technical issues that would have been solved in months during the space race. I Don'🤞t know what is more difficult these days , technical issues or bureaucratic ones

@@braindare1351 changing political priorities is definitely hamstringing long-term programs the most. And crewed deep-space missions are definitely long-term in their development. This leads to budget limitations, which leads to technical issues. That said, I'm not sold on the idea that crewed deep space missions should be pursued at all. The juice doesn't seem to be worth the squeeze.

No Fr. I wonder how much it costs to add recording footage. I just can’t imagine it being too much in this day and age. I’m surprised every unit wasn’t equipped all around with recording devices

Muchos intereses políticos y militares como para revelar algo así en otros momentos

1:04 The Earth is pear shaped 😂

@@jesus4400It's almost as though curved windows can cause optical distortion.

Yes but why is the video quality still so poor? It doesn't make any sense to me

26500 km/h

​@@zelenavyplesyze8333​​ its re-entering from the moon, it's actually 25000 mph or 40,000 km/ h

Oh I get it and it’s WILD, nerves of steel!!

And where is the land? Any land? If it's going so insanely fast we should be seeing lots of land..

​@@snakeeyes3733not necessarily, most of the world is water. And this was a pretty short clip and the craft reentered over the ocean on purpose to make a water landing.

So true. I had not thought of that

All CGI same thing

@@bakedbeans3181 1. There was no CGI in 2001. 2. Prove this is CGI without just saying its CGI.

I half expected HAL to tell me" I'm sorry Dave, but can't I do that." Lol

They aren't necessary. They didn't do it in the 60's or 70's. It was purely a ballistic fall. They are overcomplicating this.

​@@JohnHansknechtArtemis' re-entry was done exactly like it needed to be, just like during Apollo. The Apollo CM did not use a ballistic entry approach because it would have burned up in re-entry. NASA opted for a non-ballistic re-entry approach by skipping off the Earth's atmosphere once to dissipate the CM's re-entry velocity and lower the heating loads to the shielding. Artemis is still using the same re-entry technique and they have to. The Space Shuttle re-entered the atmosphere from LEO at Mach 25. Artemis' re-entry speed was Mach 32. This maneuver was very necessary.

​@@crucial0072thank you so much for this comment!

its fake and done by ai. notice how they added aurora effects and exaggerated lens flare

@@BxBxProductions please stop. You're made by AI. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

most of your life but not all of it if you are 71

@@wirebeam I'm also 71, we would've been in 4th or fifth grade, so yeah it would've been pretty much our whole lives. This was back when space flight was new and novel. Unless you lived it back then, you can't understand the excitement each mission provided our young minds.

Same here, except I turn 72 tomorrow.

​@@bobbyd6680Happy birthday sir!

@@bobbyd6680 happy birthday!

@charlesx593 many things will happen before you're 100!

You should be an astronaut in the next life

If it makes you feel any better, I'm 23, but I'm also sad that I'm guaranteed to never ever be able to travel through the galaxy at the speed of light but some lucky generation thousands of years in the future will have that privilege and probably be able to see intergalactic planets and solar systems and even meet aliens. It's not fair to be born into such a vast universe and not be able to see even the smallest percentage of it.

world is in decline, we will be back in the stone age soon.

Indoctrination is real and it's affected you for 68 years wake up now before your reincarnated back here

Its fascinating. Those sounds are from the solenoids opening and closing letting the propellant flow for a fraction of a second

@@gordon1201 I'm curious if the thrusters only fire for a set period of time and the computer keeps repeatedly firing them until it's in the right position. Or if the thrusters keep firing continuously without shutting off until it's in the right position. Does that make sense?

@@LSD123. the word you are looking for is pulse, short and long, they do not stay open. multiple short bursts are easier to control.

Are they thrusters or deflection style panels for adjustable direction and speed decrease ? That's what I assumed for whatever reason by the sounds lol

Yeah it takes a lot of accurate adjustments to get the proper speed and angles necessary for a safe reentry.

First time I've seen a full video of any #NASA use of #Skip #Re-Entry Too! It's a shame they waited over a year to release it publicly. Suggested to #NASA they rename the whole #Artimis SlS programme with #Arthritis lol They were not amused 😂

cg you mean

@@luis-sophus-8227 ??? Cg??

@@luis-sophus-8227 Your brain is computer generated.... by a fucking fish

Where would this channel get this video if NASA never released it? I guess it was already out there somewhere?

@@SamBorgman EDIT: Sorry my first sentence sounds very aggressive. I didn't intend it to be. Did I say anything about OP specifically being the one to record and release this? No. But the fact remains it's on their channel first. Obviously this footage was shot with NASA's hardware and control.

@@madezra64 heh instant internet rage, nice. You could have edited the comment itself lol. I was saying if you have searched for video like this you've probably missed it since this channel could only get this from somewhere on the internet. There might be newer clearer better videos of re-entry out there too.

@@SamBorgman I did in like the first 3 seconds lol

Same

and no continents either!

There was , it was from inside Columbia…..

​@@skater4life2360weird how there's no continents in the middle of the Pacific ocean

​@@skater4life2360 The brightness and lack of contrast hinders finer details.

Everybody knows the continents are on the flat side dummy

I agree, best simulation ever! Looks so real!

​​@@kwimms great comment... nice to read one with some actual common sense. the rest of these brainless mainstream media fed sheeple would still believe this was real even if the captions read, "simulation"

Dodging satelites with ease ! Amazing

@@kwimms😂😂😂😂

@@kwimmsthat was great joke

yeah, and the nasa vfx department forgot to add in the continents

@@skater4life2360all the information of the internet at your disposal and you chose to stay utterly ignorant 😅

@@ROVA00 Did you notice the lack of land masses?

@@skater4life2360 …you mean while it was flying over the Indian Ocean, north of Australia and over the Pacific Ocean until splashdown on the Pacific Ocean? I guess it’s easier to just say whatever nonsense comes to mind than to actually understand what’s going on, huh? It’s always the most ignorant people with the strongest opinions lol Why think about it when you can just say it’s nothing but VFX lol

@@skater4life2360The capsule was very close to earth, so it’s probably that the land masses were just out of view. And if NASA was just faking this (which they are not) I don’t think that not adding continents to the model would pass the editing team that easily.

Cgi

@@bakedbeans3181Your brain has the consistency of baked beans.

@@Armageddon325 😴🤡 sleepy clown

⁠@@bakedbeans3181you must have a sad life

@@Tittin414 way better than yours, I know reality, u do not

In this case, Orion slowed down from escape velocity, not orbital velocity. It was necessary to skip off the atmosphere, entering more than once.

same!

@@cyberia55 Thanks for clarifying that mute point for me.

@@davidlittlefield2483 Mute?

@@davidlittlefield2483 Which point was “mute”? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Re-entry velocity was 24,581mph or 36,052ft per second (39,559km/h)

I thought it was 17,500 mph lower orbit, unless it was at a higher orbit...

10555 m/s (for Kerbal players) It was so fast that first it needs atmospheric braking to reduce the apoapsis, bounced off, and then re enter again

yup 17,500 from low earth orbit, 25,000+ mph coming home from the moon, much further to fall down....@@beni_maru01

Ah maan.. now I can't stop seeing it like that

It surprised me that they're in use right up to chute deployment.

@@Vector_Ze I have a feeling that might be some kind of purge, just to expend the fuel before it hits the water. I could be wrong though, it just seemed logical.

Pk la terre paré courber ? C'est du a la vitesse ? Un effet de vision réel ou de caméra une idée ?

There hasn't been lately a lot of deep space missions that return to Earth.

Well said

😂

🤦‍♂️😆

Ain't fiction no more brotha

That’s cute :))

I have this thought too but I first remember having it with movies or TV shows. I'd be thinking "I wonder what I was doing at the exact moment this scene was being shot" lol.

Glad you enjoyed it! Amazing to "go for the ride" and really understand what Orion went through!

Oh ok, I was going to ask why it looked like it went through 2 reentry's, I always thought it got hot one time and I saw 2 times!!!!

Thanks for confirming :) I do this often in Kerbal :D

@@TheLaunchPadjust like the Apollo era

Yeah, the skip was fascinating. Heck, the whole thing was mesmerising.

🤭😁🍿

отсыпь

С возвращением.

Спасибо вам за разъяснение. Мне было интересно, каковы были некоторые эффекты.

Про отскок от атмосферы чего не упомянул? С первого раза не получилось приземлиться ..

"orientation engiens" I believe you mean vectoring thrusters 🤓

That's because there is little to no sound outside the atmosphere, and inside the outer atmosphere it's very quiet. So you're only hearing the sounds coming from inside the craft

That is not "thusters" that you're seeing that is the friction on the space shuttle moving into the atmosphere.

@@trxtech3010 The sudden sounds are the thrusters adjusting the angle of the craft. He is not talking about the flames.

@@a_kazakis the thrusters firing off sounded like an electro magnetic switch popping back and forth.

​@@moosman4217 Not entirely. Sounds also travels via conduction. So the outside sound of the craft conducted through the structure and into the camera mic.

did you see one continent or land mass?

@@skater4life2360…because they over the ocean. Do know how large the ocean

@@KristinkaAranova pacific is around 9500 miles wide... the craft would be traveling at over 18,000 mph before entering atmos. it would cross the pacific in less than 30 min at that speed. I would expect to see land

​@@skater4life2360you're not much of a thinker are you buddy.ill put this simple for you and then you can go and watch any of the countless videos of the science varies who will tell you why that happened as quite frankly I can't be bothered. Just because you didn't see something doesn't mean it isn't there,if you watch a video of say the iss streams it takes a decent amount of time between continents something that is orbiting the earth and not descending into it therefore the artemis is descending and not so much orbiting around the earth at a speed like the iss which as I said is moving across the earth essentially.i can't be bothered to go in depth because you're clearly very dull and wouldn't get it so I'll leave it there 😢

@@UltraLightVideos. insults aside, I comprehend drag from the atmos. I'd expect to see the eastern side of asia in the beginning of the video.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Picture this: Up to ≈+5 g of 'slow down'. . . . . ........

That was awesome, thank you for sharing!😊

I know...I was screaming so much...I pee in my pants. At launch...I got sooooo excited...I evacuated my bowels in my britches....What humanity can do....Im sending you the bill for a new wardrobe NASA...HAHA.

​@@CawfeeGasBlastI love pooping and peeing myself, any chance I get I let loose in my pants

What is this cult use of the term "humans"? What's wrong with saying "people"?

​@@WSCLATER the dictionary defines humans as people, and people as humans. Theyre quite interchangable

No cult. I see nothing wrong with calling ourselves humans. Isn't that what we are?@@WSCLATER

All except flat-earthers.

lol wtf - people and humans are two different meanings. Also, why does it matter?!@@WSCLATER

Thanks for sharing. I've read about NDEs and tried to imagine it. Really interesting that this video brings back memories in someone who has experienced one.

the missing land masses were cool too

@@skater4life2360What exactly do you get out of ignoring what is so obvious? Nobody has any reason to lie. We’ve spent centuries figuring out how to get to space so there’s no reason why the technology isn’t there. Why is this so hard to believe for you? It’s a basic principle. Fireworks can go up so what makes you think we can’t make a gigantic one and shoot it out of our planet?

@skater4life2360 You missing brain cells is cool too.

@@Hangry_Hungarian insults aside, the freemasons and satanista at nasa did a bang on job!

@@CFMLEAP with current materials science and computer technology, we should have "moon bases" by now. I don't think they can get past the firmament

Just because you see something on a "screen" doesn't make it real. I saw Bruce Willis land on an asteroid and blow it up to save the world. Looked pretty real to me. Just sayin'

@@IdahoPohTaToh yeah especially when you know nothing about vfx lmao, nice try ig

​@IdahoPohTaToh So something's fake if you're not personally there to witness it? I've never seen australia, so it must be fake, right?

You would've at least expected the CGI folks to make the earth consistently round.. Shoddy work even for NASA.. ;) Throw in a few stars in the darkness of space... Get a better looking sun..

@@carcinogen60yearsago I know people who have visited it.. or did they really? 🤔

If only because the front view would melt.

I mean it's reentring the atmosphere nothing much going on there.

@@eckee angle relative to the surface, velocity, acceleration (or rather, deceleration), altitude, perhaps a model of the surface showing where it is relative to the surface, stages in the program, what thrusters are firing and why, I can think of a lot of things that are going on. It looks like there was a "bounce" over the atmosphere where it grazed by and took a lot of speed off, before bouncing back off the atmosphere for a second entry later, and it looked like it was turning over to balance the load on the heat shields like you'd turn over a burger on a grill. this was way more than just flying the thing into the atmosphere, would be super cool to see how the computer was interpreting what was happening and when it decided it was time to turn over, deploy different parachutes, etc.

@@almicc yea. I'd love to have a full debrief too but even the illustrations made by NASA itself shows incorrect flight trajectory, especially the reentry. There are so many exiting things and so many details about spaceflight yet NASA treats their audience like dumb kids

The humming sound in the background reminds me of the background noise from Ao Oni 😂

There is no sound in space.

@@k.c.r.5974thanks professor

​@@k.c.r.5974Technically, there is, it just can't travel because of the vacuum

@@Thomas_Everman sound must travel in order to be heard

The knocking noises are the ReactionControlSystem(Thrusters) turning on and off I think

At launch, the abort tower covers the windows.

@@psycotria Not the entire launch

Yep. Before the tower goes, the only thing to see would be the clouds and sky. It would be a real kick in the a$$ to take that ride!@@ArraxTheWolf

I don't think there'd be a lot to see. Here we actually are hearing and seeing all the microsecond RCS adjustments to keep the capsule in the optimum re-entry orientation.

​@@psycotriadoes the abort tower extend to space?

It's cool how it swirls and gets disrupted by the thrusters. And then it starts to look like the ship is being attacked by infernal demons. Gotta be a pucker up moment for astronauts no matter what.

@@BlueZirnitra The first time we got an impression of the speed...

in the movies is where you have thunderous fireball explosions in the vacuum of space by battles of militaries from various star systems. And they all have spacecraft of superluminal flight with precision accuracy of darting across the galaxy with no abberation of the space-time continuum (or g-forces) with insane amounts of power, along with directed energy weapons. And when they engage in battles they do it just like 18th century navies.

​@@wrightmfWell I wasn't thinking about those. More like movies depicting real space historical events like The Right Stuff (1983) Apollo 13 (1995) Gagarin First In Space (2013) or Salyut 7 (2017) to name a few. In each of these movies it always has to look chaotic out of control like it's a fuel tank bursting into flames.

The early ones were ballistic, so much more rough on the astronauts…more violent. Shuttle should have been a lot like this, using skip method

and the missing continents!

@@skater4life2360 Yes, you are right. Most of the earths surface is covered with water. Isn't that strange?

@@inex1smsat wouldn't eastern asia be visible in the beginning of the video?

@@skater4life2360 Why? Below the clouds? You have to take in perspective, that the curvature we are seeing isn't that strong in reality because it is a wide angle camera. So the area we see is not as big as you think.

@@inex1smsat who really even knows

Cgi

@@bakedbeans3181 Zero content troll!

@@Raptorman0909 🤭😆 this is the most fake comment section ever! The numbers of views n comments vs. the actual people, lmao pathetic, fake raptor girl

@@Raptorman0909 99 vrill.🤡

"High quality"?

Super high quality 😂😂😂

I hate that they hide so many space footage from us , even of strange things they see out there. I hate this human civilization. Earth needs to blow up already haha

Imagine when Gagarin first experienced this. And he has to jump out of the capsule because they can't figure out how to land it safely.

or bits of the ablative heat shield?

@@MrJTownsend1 That did occur to me, but the chunks seem too big, too far away, and have too much of a velocity differential to have come from the capsule. Either way, it is beyond cool to see!

​@@ACDCROCKS135I bet you're right

I see that too now. Yeah I agree that could be bits of service module

Not the SM, separation from the SM occurs 2 days prior, the CM is nowhere near the SM during re-entry by design. I'm not sure what that could be, very interesting.

Just a small correction. Those are not "heat mitigation maneuvers," but rather LIFT MANAGEMENT maneuvers. The capsule's center of gravity is offset from its centerline, resulting in an oblique reentry. The heat shield isn't pointed straight into the direction of travel. It is at a somewhat oblique angle, and more atmosphere is displaced in one direction than the other, creating a lifting force in the opposite direction. By rolling the capsule, the direction of lift can be changed, which both allows precise splashdown targeting and reduced g-loads during reentry. Generally, the capsule only experiences a maximum of 4 g's during reentry. By comparison, the Mercury capsules, which did not have lifting bodies and therefore reentered on a purely ballistic trajectory experienced over 10 g's.

I've seen one other re-entry video besides this on UKposts. I believe it was a rocket booster (?) falling back to Earth. What really struck me was how the audio kicks in once the booster is low enough in the atmosphere. Total space silence....and then suddenly turbulence. And then, same as this video, several minutes later it hits the water. Check it out if you can find it, it's amazing footage.

Hi @@phoenixshade3. I did not actually mention anything to do with "heat mitigation maneuvers", but you have half a point. I actually called them RCS Thrusters, where RCS stands for "Reaction Control System". These are used for attitude adjustment for two reasons, first, as you mentioned, "Lift Management", which can adjust trajectory, but they also actually perform heat mitigation at the same time. Rotating the lifting body surfaces of the capsule can change centre of gravity and therefore trajectory, but it also rotates the heat shield to more evenly distribute heat loading on the structure of the lifting body. Cheers.

​@@phoenixshade3 I believe Gemini capsules were the first to try lift capabilities by spinning the capsules at oblique angles, correct? And if I'm not mistaken it's seemed as though Orion was engaging roll reversals similar to shuttle to disapate energy. What say you?

I feel like everyone is correct here. Capsule does all of the above, lifts, spins, angles of attack are multipurpose & have been around for decades. One second it can be firing for trajectory the next could be heat mitigation

same!

Looks like it got scorched by the reentry plasma and became cloudy. It's a lot clearer at the start of the video.

I think it’s called “reefing”. There’s a super interesting history learning of how much of an actual engineering problem figuring out how to reliably get it to work truly was. And that was in the early days of skydiving & ejection seat development. X 1000 for operations such as re-entry on top of that.

Did not one ‘chute fail the first time?

@@nels9382 No idea honestly.

​@@nels9382The initial ones were drogue chutes.