Thanks

🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹😱

4:20 its celtic god Cernunnos (its the second video i see Cernunnos put in a indus valley civilization documentary) thank you for the disinformation and the lack of serious research

,

wow, never thought about air conditioning

@Kiranjit Sahota ikr? Just having indoor plumbing and sewage using some channels in the walls and below the floors is impressive enough, but designing your wall-bricks to be porous enough to create evaporative cooling? 😲 Wow. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at Wikipedia and the sources it references and verify what I'm saying.

that is awesome

We invited literally everything base knowledge 0

Swamp Cooler

It's probably useful to know in these cases that conventionally, the leader gets the majority of credits even in the West, so I can't see any wrong-doing here. If he was supervisor, that's who the credit goes to. By the way, science is mostly not about great men and their findings, but about the findings themselves, so even the greatest of men may eventually get forgotten.

Stephan Brun are you justifying colonialism ... why do you think a white guys was a leader in India the first place.

@@PriyankitaPant By right of conquest, pretty much the rule for government change everywhere for millennia until we stopped it in the 20th century?

Just like how you guys have take yoga. It’s not hard to be honest. It’s can also be a good sign of mutual respect for others.

@@DHARMYOGCOM What do you mean "have taken yoga?" It was my impression people actually went to India to learn from Indian masters just like any native student. Nothing was taken that wasn't freely taught. If you have a problem with that, take it up with those masters, if they still live.

If I'm not mistaken, Hinduism was the first religion. Aside from paganism and Philosophy, of course. I could be wrong, of course.

Hinduism, Paganism, Folk Mythologies, Henotheism & Philosophy are the oldest religions. The origins of Hinduism go back to the syncretic mix between Indus Valley beliefs/traditional practices, & Indo-Aryan beliefs/spiritual practices.

@Soar-ed Recreation hinduism without dout is in fact the oldest living amalgamation of religious tradition on earth . We still adopt lots of animistic beliefs apart from other differnt traditions which can be overlapping or sometimes contradicting. Hinduism is a mix of belives system of indo european people ,harrapan people and the earliest African people who now lives in Andaman Nicobar island.

Hinduism is a pagan religion

It would be cool if someone discovered an "Indian Rosetta Stone" containing the Indus Valley Civilization's language as well as a later language such as Sanskrit so we could learn more about their culture and beliefs. The religion of the Indus Valley Civilization probably evolved and fused with other belief systems to form modern Hinduism.

I didn't know about the connection of harrapan civilisation in Chandigarh..we have harrapa the ancient city ruines right next to Sahiwal here in our Pakistani Punjab..it's South of my city Lahore...

Lol pakistan once was part of india And we have sites in haryana gujrat punjab

@@karanSingh-rz5vk yes it was...but not anymore...like USA was part of Britain once ...countries change..cultures change...get used to it...

@@faisalrehman8298 Same, Chandigarh is in Ganges plains, not Harappa. Or maybe the Civilization was widespread than we believe is to be. There are ancient cities near Amritsar tho.

If that is the case, builders of Chandigarh destroyed ancient city and built a new city on top. Except Mohenjodaro, they were smaller cities. Original settlenet should have been preserved and new should have been guilt next to it.

1826 by charles meson

Three other scholars whose names I cannot pass over in silence, are the late Mr. R. D. Banerji, to whom belongs the credit of having discovered, if not Mohenjo-daro itself, at any rate its high antiquity, and his immediate successors in the task of excavation, Messrs. M.S. Vats and K.N. Dikshit. ... no one probably except myself can fully appreciate the difficulties and hardships which they had to face in the three first seasons at Mohenjo-daro"

Yes you are right

when gen z learns about hisrtory:

Schtay in yo lane boiiiiiii

Your chanel is great

Why is your video missing.

Yes, the Harappans moved down south. Were NOT obliterated.

Yeah. Dislocation should be the correct word.

lowest caste indian actually from indus valley civilization

@@nabeeldin3544 Yes. I also think that is the case.

Glad I’m descended from this ancient people. I’m a Dravidian speaker😏 we are the original natives of india.

Someone cooked a rhinoceros into my deer

Exactly what I was thinking

Always trying to improve our animation and info thanks for watching!

i made this city

Nathan Williams or philologists

You seem like such a nice person (from your comments)

Weren't some of the Mesopotamian civilizations older? Still definitely one of if not the oldest.

Vinca culture is much older

@@Survivethejive Much? how much older is vinca culture? harrapan culture is dated back from 5500B.C-1700B.C

@Lord Voldemort why dont you open the link and read the layers of urban settlements of harrapan Civilization dated back as far as 6000-5000B.C while the harrapa as a culture started from atleast 7000B.C from the material evidences like poettry and all other stuff. also the pre harrapan cities like dwarka existed till 5000B.C and dating as far as 9-10kB.C from the dating of artifacs and remains found there.

@Lord Voldemort do u understand what it mean "deep layers of Urban Settlements"? a Settlement is urban or Rural can be distinguished based on material Evidence. and in saraswati valley enough evidence of Urban Settlements dating back to 5000-7000B.C are present

ya anicent india artitech

Recent research shows that they we're probably older and more older than Sumerians.

@@CDRNY25 that why I said that recent studies show that IVC might be older or around the same time as Sumerians, Their no LAW which says only middle eastern civilizations are supposed to be the oldest.With time new knowledge is uncovered.

@@ishanbajpai6940 Yep, it appears that they arose contemporaneously with Sumer. The architecture and writing system is clearly different (e.g. Indus Valley has no ziggurats and they didn't use cuneiform), but there is no doubt that these civilizations were aware of each another. A few Indus seals have been found in Mesopotamia, but the bulk have been found in the Oman region. So perhaps the ones found in Mesopotamia just made their way up the coastline (Oman being the middleman) rather than an extensive trade network between Sumer and Indus. It's really hard to say based on the scant evidence.

Lord Voldemort no research has been made. He's pulling it out of his brown ass cause he's an indian ultranationalist butthurt. He probably blindly believes the Aryan invasion was a myth while he wonders why he and his 3 billion Apu-looking twins speak aryan languages.

@@dondeestaCarter what is exactly your point??

indus velley is Tamil civilization. check out keeladi new found civilization 2600 yrs old in south India

@@greybands973 yes ye don't speak tamil.. I've been in the conference of linguistic of Indus civilization and they said it wasn't tamil

Maryam Abid its wrong. IVC is a dravidian civilization as there no religious symbol like they say in vedas . Deities are so popular in vedas but they couldnt found that in thousands of artifacts of IVC. IVC people could have spoken tamil oldest dravidian language. Then came aryans and mixed with north indian people. ANI and ASI genes research clearly shows the difference. Politics in india by Aryans who twist the history for their benefits and prejudice.

Indus valley civilization is tribal ( indegenous people) civilization. Bhil meena gond kirat santhal ( indegenous peoples of india )

Indeed! There's similar evidence of well developed but none combative civilisations in Australia as well.

Devvv watch the movie Mohenjo Daro, there were many fights for power

@@greybands973 A movie made by Bollywood with a very weak research done, as we can see in the movie? No, thanks. I'd rather read some actual archaeology or linguistics than a retarted movie.

Ishu Better Than You the archeology and linguistics that you read is the same shit they’ve read when they made the movie. You think a high budget movie like that would make shit up? There’s lots of evidence to back up the power fights that happened at the time.

@@greybands973 xD Yeah, I would. If you actually believe a single thing in that movie, when we had absolutely no idea if they wore fucking peacock feathers like some Vedic culture shit, I have nothing to say to you. "High budget" and still made one of the worst portrayals of any ancient society till now.

Kung-fu really?

You forgot anime.

@@bosbanon3452 I don't know about South, but definitely the North. A variety of Chinese martial arts have some roots from the north part of India. The Chinese straight-sword called the Jian, has roots from Indo-Aryan longsword. The branch of Chinese martial arts called Changquan (Long fist) has its roots in India and Persia as well. The same can be said for the Dao (Broadsword), and Qiang (spear). But the one that intriques me the most is the Gun (staff), which was ubiquitous to begin with.

@@bosbanon3452 look up Bodhidharma it's true kung fu came from india

@Swapn Lok not really because of vindhya and aravali mountain it is a stretch both North and South are always semi segregated

After effects for animating stuff (Still learning, only a novice) Illustrator for drawings. Maps are drawn using Photoshop. Premiere pro to edit and put it all together xD

Thanks for watching!

me also

I'd go back and give Ashoka machine gun technology

@@pabslondon Give it to the young Ashoka . Stuff will happen faster

yeh that was weird

That is the mark of Pashupati the animal god of hinduism!

If you look at that , you will find there is a man sitting surrounded by animals/nature. Means Indus valley civilization were nature worshippers , not any religious

@@NN94887 Yes, the sneaky aryans added a lot of our culture and mixed it with theirs to create Hinduism

@@eyeoftruth4405 no actually they had nothing in the name of culture except racisam ,but they copied everything from different culture (mostly our indians ) and serve to indians in their own flavour and thousands years of uneducation and slavery makes indians to forget their own culture , due to which they are used to known as world wide and still today .

You don’t know that

@@rythem2032 umm we know that, we're Aryans, direct descendant of world's oldest civ Indus Valley

@@cpt.knight8647 The Aryans arrived long after the IVC collapsed.. and yes we do know

@@pabslondon Oh you think i will believe your bullshit "History of the Asia according to West" theory😂🤣 Kid go and read Hindu Vedas/ scripts/sanhitas we already have whole history saved unlike your stupid theories that you used to persuade retard indians. Arya was not a race it was a Varna.

@chachi mogo then you tell me what culture or religion the Harappans are more related to if they were not Indians or Hindus

Invasion? Not really. More like a migration and integration. But things did get pretty messy.

@Shivaji the Great You may want to look at this article and the study it is based off then: scroll.in/article/874102/aryan-migration-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-study-on-indian-genetics www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/03/31/292581.full.pdf

@Shivaji the Great Yeah there was. It's the reason why North Indians and South Indians look different. South Indians are the old natives to India, while North Indians are descendants of the Aryans. Iranians and Afghanis are also Aryans, but since North Indians mixed with the Dravidians (South Indians) and Iranians mixed with Arabs, our appearances and cultures drifted apart. Our languages are still pretty similar though. If you were to compare Farsi (Iranian) with, for example, Hindi, you'd see they're at least kinda related.

@@sempitraum5541 yes that is true. Linguistically speaking the North Indian languages are similar to the Iranian languages like Farsi, Kurdish, balochi.etc and there are a lot of similarities between Sanskrit(Indian), Avestan(Iranian), ancient Greek, Latin and the proto Germanic and Celtic languages. I am from South India and I speak two South Indian languages( kannada and Tamil and some Telugu too) and also Hindi. I find a lot of similarities between the South Indian languages. On the surface we see many Sanskrit words used in kannada, but these are just later borrowings. Deep down the South Indian(dravidian ) languages are very different from the North Indian (indo-aryan) languages. In South India we are made to learn Hindi. So we know that there is a huge difference between our languages and the North Indian languages. In North India people don't learn our languages. If they did even they would see the huge difference in our languages. Also our customs and traditions are also slightly different. Of course there have been centuries of cultural exchange between our peoples and there is a lot in common. Let us not forget that today we are one people regardless of whatever may have have happened in the past. I believe in the Aryan migration theory but that doesn't mean I am not a proud Indian. I am a very proud Indian and a proud Hindu too. I want India to be a United, strong nation. I believe that we will be stronger if we stop letting our egos come in the way and stop aggressively trying to deny any sort of cultural exchange/migration between ancient India, ancient Iran, ancient Europe and the the ancient caucuses region, and accept that ancient Indians and the ancient people from these places were related (vasudhaiva kutumbakum). There is also a lot of research that has been done on the ancient religions and mythologies of these regions and I must say there is a lot of similar stuff. Even though I firmly believe in this hypothesis I do not want this to be something that divides our country. Again, we are one people today. Jai Hind!

At that time these Indo-Aryans were still Aryans and had not really seperated from their West Aryan (Iranian) cousins.

Forest Dweller Same here 😂thanks for watching sorry for the lack of uploads lately

Last year It's proven and published in nature journal that Indus river changed the course and civilization flourished in dried river. Which is nothing to do with Saraswati river. Mean while the artifact, Flora,fauna which rig Veda mentioned is found in central Asia. Moreover the Saraswati river which rig Veda mentioned is found to be Afghanistan exact river is also mentioned in avesta in corrupted word xaraswati.

ravish bharti or may be they shifted towards Ganga plane with Army, who will leave arms? Recent excavation fi d very old chariot marks and arms like Maharabhara, site- UP, Sanauli, ASI diggings

Considering there was no Geneva convention and The Hague or Human Rights or U.N back then for such a thing called "international condemnation", do you really think people didn't have savage and barbaric wars during those times? Life expectancy in the past 75 years has gone up, wars have gone down. Now try comparing that to the past 6000 years and how well people were doing with each other during those ages.

The highly cultured Indus people quite matured enough to understand to live in peace, the highest virtue of humanity. So they did not make or possess weapons.

Thanks for watching

Because that’s how far the Indus Valley sites spread. Ancient civilisations don’t always fit modern borders of nation states

The daughter and the wife of the god Brahma! A pornography story by stupid Aryans.

@@iamskkumar2843 the mighty sarawati river which is stated in rig vedas as well as Zen avesta as harasvati It is scientifically proven fact that the mighty river which was at it's peak dried up around 2500B.C.E

pretty much.

That was pretty accurate

Hmm what’s your point India was the world richest country since the time of Indus Valley right upto British Invasion a few centuries of stagnation changes nothing India will be back .

king yogesh it will for sure, may not be for a while though, probably not in our lifetime.

@Rich 91 Britishers were not the first to unite the whole region .

Yeah ... that's what I thought I saw.

some people say it looks like the seal from IVC - maybe he had it ready to show the comparison and used it there instead because of the animals in the shot

Coincidence? I think not!

Mohenjo-Daro was abandoned at about 1900 BCE not 1500 BCE. The Indus Valley civilization declined over a centuries as people moved away from population centers and into the countryside.

Harappans are aryans

@@nothingexists5066 that word is literally from a language family that originates in Europe and was not spoken by Harrapans

@@Survivethejive harappa is also a sanskrit word and word arya first used by indo aryans ( vedic people ) Aryans had roots from indus valley civilization and after collapse they settled in Europe, north India, south India and iran Sanskrit is much older than entire European civilization

so what if the indus valley civ were a heavily trade reliant civ that collapsed because of the interconnectedness of bronze age civ

No tectonic movement...which shifted course of river.

The equal spread of sanitation is a strong hint

Primarily lack of palaces, which is a common feature of the other early civilizations

Shaan Yeah. What about the people who kept those latrines so clean?

@@BarbaraBastron lold

@@BarbaraBastron That is why they say "relative" I guess.

Brahmins came to India after Indus Valley ended.

Bro they are tribal priests. Pashupatinath temple of Nepal. They have tribal priests not bharmans.

I wouldn't think it would matter what label one puts on a religious figure here. The knowledge of Shakti remains the same and that's what's being represented by the snake. 🙏

@@patel6029 thank you

@@TheJett1904 bro indain ?

Probably wasn't as much of a paradise as is presumed in this video. Much of ancient Central-Asian civilizations were/are romanticized.

Archeology is factually more accurate than written records that are almost always biased and or wrong.

@@Nemoticon You really think that the record written by a people at a given point in time are going to be accurate? That is an arrogant statement to make. Depending on who wrote the "archeological records" originally, they can be bullshit as well.

@@user-ww2lc1yo9c The very nature of archeology is fact finding.... unlike the recording of history, which is only ever written by the 'victors'. It would be arrogant to dismiss rhat in the first place. Archeology has often proven with irrefutable evidence history innaccurate on many occassions. Also as a subject of historical science, academically, it is always looking to correct itself if new findings are discovered. Again, unlike historically recorded accounts. It is the benefit you get from having a basic education.

@@Nemoticon so archaeologists cannot be biased in their assessment/interpretation of artifacts?

@@razsigrun3105 Depends on the professional conduct on the individual. Thats why there are standards, other people resort to guessing and then its just all a massive waste of time.

They were trade centers

Wait a sec... i just realised that.

Mate thats because they were descendants from Persia.

Brick-started?

But why the weapons were not found in this civilization, the remaining two civilizations formed kingdoms. It seems the other two didn't have any much influence on this civilization

Lets check the Indus Valley Civ.... There Gone

The Indus was not a superpower by present day studies they were just a bunch of united configurations just like how a federation it was not a COUNTRY or not under a unified king their were shared kings or rulers for each region and the Indus people didnt call them selfs Pakistani . Each regions people called their region different names just like how Sindh , Punjab, Balochistan are provinces in Pakistan today or Indian states of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab ,Haryana each region it seems had a name for it selfs . United on a federation like basis their was no one king from the centre like from Delhi with a central command system of government .

Bruh it was part of India

@@MM-br3gt Ok, Be it a federation, it was a superpower empire, it was more than an empire, it was a civilization.

@@ShubhamGaikwad-wf1dg Bruh it wasn't

@@naveedali1406 It was not a empire it was a civilization were a man or human beings become mature and comes out of stone age and becomes civilized . A civilization is different a empire is different . A empire or dynasty is run by strong central government like a king the Indus valley civilization was not run by a king . But a bunch of principalities that were united for trade related then collaped . Different kings had their own rulers their are 900 city's in the IVC . With 900 kings in each city not one central government

Good question probably Jambudweep.

Mesopotamians called India melhua we don't know what the people of indus called their land as their language hasn't been decoded

Meluhha and jambudweep

It's because the seals used by Indus valley civilization traders look remarkably similar to the one shown. So maybe he must've got confused.

Yeah that's pretty clearly a rhino. Not sure where the "deer" comes from.

pashupati seal has been found

@@johnjacobastoriv688 so what ,shiva himself is adopted by Aryans later. If today indians use many things west and vice-versa doesn't mean everthing belongs to them. In history every culture adopted something from other culture . And shiva is one of them. Otherwise there no main similarity between Indus valley civilization and hinduisam.

@@NN94887 ever heard about swastik, dalit??

@@johnjacobastoriv688 so what??actually you want to say??

@@NN94887 swastik is hindu, this prove that indus valley is hindu

Daniel Jones silk is chiness i think

Cotton was not discovered in NA

@@vineethjoshy4819 five times more sites have been found on the sarasvati, which is dried up now, and the word indus is more of a persian/ outsider term so sarasvati makes more sense historically and politically to refer to this amazing civilization

@@vineethjoshy4819 i have heard that theory but it seems just as likely(more in my opinion) that the sarasvati was referring to a great, Himalaya fed river east of the indus today. (you can see evidence of this on google earth) also the vedas talk the most about the sarasvati and only briefly about the indus, a rain fed river would not be nearly abundant enough to support a civilization of that size or to take such a central role in the vedas. there is also a river which sounds similar to the sarasvati in serbia which like the harahvaiti was likely named after the all important sarasvati.

@Shivaji the Great nice!, thanks for that info!!!

@@vineethjoshy4819 well that still remains to be proven fundamentally one way or the other. from a simply intuitive perspective, fronteir india (indus and saraswati) would make sense to be the most populous and earliest civilization which would have invented much more culture than that of nomads from central asia.

Yes, "saraswathi" civilization.

Indus valley civilization is the point from where Hinduism started

Why you guys hide Hinduism there In that time only one religion that is sanatana dharma 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💪💪💪💪🕉🕉🕉🕉 Sanskrit and proto dravidian languages are national languages of civilization Neither Arabic nor baloch Swastikas are symbol of peace of that people and om is real truth

​@@nothingexists5066 Indus valley is not Hindu, it is Dravidian