Robin Hanson on Grabby Aliens and When Humanity Will Meet Them

  Переглядів 5,995

Future of Life Institute

Future of Life Institute

День тому

Robin Hanson joins the podcast to explain his theory of grabby aliens and its implications for the future of humanity.
Learn more about the theory here: grabbyaliens.com
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
00:49 Why should we care about aliens?
05:58 Loud alien civilizations and quiet alien civilizations
08:16 Why would some alien civilizations be quiet?
14:50 The moving parts of the grabby aliens model
23:57 Why is humanity early in the universe?
28:46 Could't we just be alone in the universe?
33:15 When will humanity expand into space?
46:05 Will humanity be more advanced than the aliens we meet?
49:32 What if we discovered aliens tomorrow?
53:44 Should the way we think about aliens change our actions?
57:48 Can we reasonably theorize about aliens?
53:39 The next episode
Social Media Links:
➡️ WEBSITE: futureoflife.org
➡️ TWITTER: / flixrisk
➡️ INSTAGRAM: / futureoflifeinstitute
➡️ META: / futureoflifeinstitute
➡️ LINKEDIN: / future-of-life-institute

КОМЕНТАРІ: 26
@vblaas246
@vblaas246 Рік тому
Thanks! Got here from PBS Space Time, nice visualisations there in this topic.
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco 5 місяців тому
Understanding his statistical reasoning better, I feel there is a possibility that we actually do observe the “slower” expansion of the grabby galactic engineers. Evidence of the engineering as he described what to look for appears to explain the dark matter models where the engineered galactic structure have only left the gravitational signatures. The obvious cases are the anomalies where dark matter appears not present in certain “special” galaxies, which appear to obey normal GR dynamics minus any Dark Matter influence, and the opposite cases where the dark matter map shows “galaxies” that appear devoid of stars. What we can see at present are different engineering projects in process. The gravity signature is the only aspect we can observe until we understand what the technology is and what it is doing on galactic scales (obviously having to do with stars, ie visible matter which is perhaps simple the material not being “engineered yet”). The 1998 supernovae data reveals that at a certain point in cosmic history, the grabby engineers realized (perhaps due to certain interactions between grabby races) that it was necessary to “accelerate” the expansion rate in order to separate the engineering projects from each other in the far future. Perhaps to isolate and protect galaxies or to simply “hide” the history of whatever happened that lead them to engineer the accelerated expansion. So, astronomers should be looking at the distance scale where the acceleration kicked in for signs of the events that might have given rise to this decision. Perhaps inventory of dark matter galaxies with more or less stars than normal, would be a place to start looking for signatures.
@owenlewis4540
@owenlewis4540 Рік тому
Excellent talk! This is also why we need to fight centralization and bureaucratic control like our lives depend on it. Because they, and the future of our civilization, do.
@inkpaper_
@inkpaper_ 10 місяців тому
amazing talk. thank you very much.
@danielvarga_p
@danielvarga_p Рік тому
Thank you! Robin Hanson is really great. My theory predicts Grabby Aliens if you interested more.
@vblaas246
@vblaas246 Рік тому
Interesting view on 'rot' in systems and software engineering. Hardware we bulk in 'the cloud', software.. we just automate the rot away at lightning speed, not preventing increase in complexity though. Funghi are the most similar to humans in a networking analogy. Which system will be more interlinked? In space tech producticity and systemic intellect? China or Western World + Africa + India + Japan + Korea + Singapore. Compatible cultural, social and governmental national networks. This is the key..
@cheeseheadfiddle
@cheeseheadfiddle Рік тому
Great talk. Wow. Thinking about biological species: don’t they generally die out from overshoot of carrying capacity in their environment? Are we humans in overshoot? Can you say that about technologies? Over saturating the market demand, until the need for it no longer exists?
@Dan-dy8zp
@Dan-dy8zp 2 місяці тому
The simplest thing to do with the galaxy that's quiet is to sterilize it of simple life that could become competition.
@MelliaBoomBot
@MelliaBoomBot Рік тому
28.04.... "in a few billion years it'll be awful..." LOL
@cheeseheadfiddle
@cheeseheadfiddle Рік тому
For me, the elephant in this room is the nature of consciousness. To talk about the next billion years of human existence without contemplation of the revelation/exploration of consciousness and being itself leaves a big gap. For myself anyway.
@grahamstewart615
@grahamstewart615 20 днів тому
We Come in Peace
@lockaltube
@lockaltube 9 місяців тому
From FTX docs: Similarly, on June 30, 2022, the FTX Foundation funded a $400,000 grant (wired directly from an account in the name of North Dimension) to an entity that posted animated videos on UKposts related to “rationalist and [Effective Altruism] material,” including videos on “grabby aliens.” Yay, money!
@cricketkajanoon3363
@cricketkajanoon3363 Рік тому
NYC
@scottlemurianboxer
@scottlemurianboxer Рік тому
I like this model and theory. I just don't like that he assumes if their is 1 there has to be hundreds? Well maybe the distances are so vast, and They expand at rate to slow to quickly over take the universe. Also given the that odds of a civilization making it through "all the great filters" to even become a "grabby civilization" are high enough to have many. I think if its True, "we as humans are a grabby civilization" and we see at the rate we expand.
@StuGames
@StuGames Рік тому
From what I understood it doesn't assume that there are a lot of civ's, it concludes that by some kind of anthropic reasoning: We are very early => (anthropic reasoning) it is unlikely to be very much later than us => alien civ's must colonize the universe within the next few billion years => they must be expanding fast because we can't see them
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco 5 місяців тому
I felt the same as you at first until I understood his statistical reasoning. It is not that having only 1 data point or sample of tech civilization (us) means we have no right to assume there must be “more” data out there. Instead it is more about WHEN the data point comes in as a viable sample. His point is that based on stellar evolution and the age of the universe, WE should not be here YET. Yes we are allowed to exist alone in the universe, but as a statistical data point, we appear 10 to power 18 YEARS TOO EARLY!!! This is an enormous discrepancy based on the available parameters. It is so enormously improbable that it is orders of magnitude more likely that based on TIME ALONE, we arrive early because it is actually not “early”, it is the typical way it goes when you have many civilizations. Make sense? Don’t feel bad, the interviewer did not get the magnitude of the problem either and asked for more explanation after he had just clearly stated it.
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco 5 місяців тому
By the way he cancels this statistical problem easily by assuming both 1. Intelligent life is EASY and common….not supported even by history of life on earth, and 2. Long lived stars unlike ours (red dwarf stars) do not support life. Considering that Earth could function in orbit around a red dwarf EASILY, by moving its orbit in closer such that the radiation is equivalent to Earth Sun relation now, (not counting the possibility that a locked-face orbit might happen at certain closer distances), there is no reason to assume all life dies around a red dwarf. The timing improbability is so enormous that gradual chipping away of the statistic based on refined data of 1 and 2 above in favor of placing our arrival ever earlier in time, doesn’t remove the problem.
@oatlord
@oatlord 6 місяців тому
There's little chance humanity won't spread out. It's like an inbuilt dream.
@andrewdunbar828
@andrewdunbar828 11 місяців тому
I found the "Foom Debate" with Robin Hanson much more interesting where he was together with Eliezer Yudkowsky than he is in this video. The Foom Debate exists in at least wo UKposts videos. The video is pretty poor, something to listen to rather than watch.
@charlesholder8957
@charlesholder8957 3 місяці тому
If you do something before dementia doesn't mean you didn't do it
@jennifercall9014
@jennifercall9014 Рік тому
Aliens? like say humans on Earth? Perspective I guess.
@AngelinaGooseman
@AngelinaGooseman Рік тому
so "specially intellectual" than every other human, so much to the extent of stupidity?
@ropeswingify
@ropeswingify 2 місяці тому
I've got an African American girlfriend.. Absolutely gorgeous.. But "quiet"?? I wish.
How might AI be weaponised? | Al, Social Media and Nukes at SXSW 2024
57:53
Future of Life Institute
Переглядів 393
Universe is full of aliens | Robin Hanson and Lex Fridman
17:40
Lex Clips
Переглядів 462 тис.
McDonald’s MCNUGGET PURSE?! #shorts
00:11
Lauren Godwin
Переглядів 32 млн
КИРПИЧ ОБ ГОЛОВУ #shorts
00:24
Паша Осадчий
Переглядів 6 млн
Эта Мама Испортила Гендер-Пати 😂
00:40
Глеб Рандалайнен
Переглядів 3,6 млн
Carl Robichaud on Preventing Nuclear War
1:39:04
Future of Life Institute
Переглядів 1 тис.
Humanity was born way ahead of its time. The reason is grabby aliens.
12:55
Rational Animations
Переглядів 1,6 млн
The great filter | Robin Hanson | TEDxLimassol
16:59
TEDx Talks
Переглядів 132 тис.
Roman Yampolskiy on Shoggoth, Scaling Laws, and Evidence for AI being Uncontrollable
1:31:14
Future of Life Institute
Переглядів 1,9 тис.
Jaan Tallinn Keynote: 2024 Vienna Conference on Autonomous Weapons
13:17
Future of Life Institute
Переглядів 569
The Last Human - A Glimpse Into The Far Future
12:31
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 12 млн
A Simple Model of Grabby Aliens | Robin Hanson, George Mason University
1:23:30
Foresight Institute
Переглядів 27 тис.
Dan Hendrycks on Catastrophic AI Risks
2:07:25
Future of Life Institute
Переглядів 2,4 тис.
Frank Sauer on Autonomous Weapon Systems
1:42:41
Future of Life Institute
Переглядів 932
Grabby Aliens & The Fermi Paradox
32:26
Isaac Arthur
Переглядів 124 тис.
Клавиатура vs геймпад vs руль
0:47
Balance
Переглядів 866 тис.
The ARM chip race is getting wild… Apple M4 unveiled
4:07
Fireship
Переглядів 503 тис.
Игровой ноутбук за 100тр в МВИДЕО
0:58
KOLBIN REVIEW
Переглядів 370 тис.
🤯Самая КРУТАЯ Функция #shorts
0:58
YOLODROID
Переглядів 2,9 млн
M4 iPad Pro Impressions: Well This is Awkward
12:51
Marques Brownlee
Переглядів 4,6 млн