Federer is a class all his own! No one like him, plays like him, is as classy as him! Those shots are his! I miss seeing him play!

Your comment is so innovative and original, I love it

100% agree. Novak is the most successful, Roger is the most talented.

"I'll probably get a lot of hate for this comment" --- not from Fedal fans; only the other lot 🤔

Tbf, Roger and Rafa, who were already both Titans in the mid 2000’s cancelled out each other before Novak peaked. If weak era argument is true, then the current one is the weakest of all, and its exactly the reason why Novak is bagging slams and masters.

The most naturally gifted GREAT tennis player. There’s plenty of hyper talented players out there with unlimited shot making skills. What separated Roger from them was his consistency, fundamentals and other basics that allowed him to use his talent to his full potential. At the end of the day it’s ultimately about winning and Federer was one of the greatest winners of all time, but that’s due mostly to things other than magical shot making skills

I love Robbie!

I've always worried about that word. Now I know how to spell it!

I agree with you about the incomparable and inimitable quality of Roger Federer's tennis. It is a combination of great original talent, hard work, a mentality that respects the sport, and even a physique, a body that is proportionally very suitable for this sport.

I so agree! It's not the number of slams or trophies. You can win class and elegance!

Yes ,agree ...i think...if the game is just about wining there is just one player above to Roger Federer and any player you want to compare : Rod Laver only player who won the four GS in one year twice

Based on touch, feel, power, athleticism, Alcaraz is the most talented player ever by a huge margin. Whether he can convert this into greatness over his career is another question though

​@@mikemoggerson6651🙄

@@mikemoggerson6651 Dude, no. Better than Novax for sure but RF won 17 GS with a racquet that's close to a wooden one and he could still generate laser shots with it. And with a one handed backhand...

​@@mikemoggerson6651You are Alcaraz on a pedestal when he still has a long way to go before he should be mentioned in the same breath as the big 3.

@@pierre-marc.gareau close to a wooden racquet? My goodness you’re an amateur. If you think Fed’s racquet in the mid 2000s was remotely similar to a wooden racquet you may be the biggest Fed shill of all time. No one would be able to even win a match in the past 20 years with anything close to a wooden racquet.

That would be Miloslav Mecir. But Federer is super smooth and elegant too, of course.

Finally! I’ve always thought of him to be a raptor-like apex predator. A broad wingspan with no extra muscle, and the way he opens his upper body whether it is serving or volleying, is very powerful. His combination of instinct and athleticism meant when he came to the net, he often won the point. Always a top 5 server, he had a good jump up and forward, and the ball came off his racket with a brisk snap generated by his torso. (And his back gave him problems at one point). Whether jumping or moving forward to take the ball earlier, Fed was about early action and interception. Yet he looked so absolutely relaxed while making the most ridiculously good shots.

Yes alcaraz can also do the disguised punch trough drop shot he do it sometimes and maybe he can improve it 😅

Alcaraz has hit many shots this year Fed could never dream of.

@@mikemoggerson6651 if you hate Fed, un-sub

Stop insuating with alcaraz in every vidéo of fédérée what is you problème In every videos you mentionated this young guy withoot name him directly What has hé done to you kill your mother or someting 😅😅

There’s many people with skill sets like Roger. There’s countless players on tour with magical shot making skills, flair, and elegant technique. The only thing that separates Fed from them was how good Federer was overall as a tennis player. To make it sound like his elegance and shot making skill was unmatched is just not true. His elegance and shot making skill was amazing but was combined with consistent winning. It’s really the winning and domination that people care about first, then they look back at how a player made them feel. But only for the greats. Nobody cares if Monfils hits 30 spectacular winners in a match if he loses in straight sets.

​@@mikemoggerson6651Doesn't the fact he managed to do all that while being consistent make for "unmatched"? Seeing as nobody else did it like him.🤷

@@mikemoggerson6651 of the major winners, Federer is the most talented

Tennis is dead in July 2021 😢

Thx man this means a lot 🙏 Appreciate the support over the years

Federer won 4 grand slams after 2010. 3 of those came in the time frame Djokovic was injured and out of the top 10 from 2017-2018. Federer was 2-10 against Novak in grand slams after Novak turned 22. Novak has better stats and everyone in pro tennis, including Sampras, McEnroe, Wilander, Nadal, etc knows he is the goat. Literally EVERYONE to the point where it’s not even worth mentioning it anymore. Let me just cite a few examples “I do think what Novak's done over the past 10 years, winning the majors, being consistent, finishing No. 1 for seven years, to me it's a clear sign that he is the greatest of all time”-Pete Sampras in 2021 “Novak has that ability, which is part of the reason why he's the greatest ever.”-John McEnroe “It’s an impossibility to make a statistical argument against him being the best ever. It’s like proving gravity at this point. He’s now tied Margaret Court on 24 Slams but he wants all of the records, so he’ll want to get to 25.”-Andy Roddick “To me, [with] 24 [Grand Slam singles titles], it’s pretty evident that he’s best player of all time. He’s got the record and he’s probably got the best win-loss record against all the players against each other as well, and against the other top players.”-Pat Rafter “He has ended the debate over who is the greatest male player of all time.”-Tim Henman “Djokovic is the GOAT because the numbers tell it all. 24 SLAMS 96 singles titles. But he is on Mt. Rushmore because when you play the Serbian Sniper he made you RUSH MORE!”-Rick Macci I could go on for countless pages but Djokovic is the unanimous goat of tennis. Please, tell me anyone who’s of relevance in the last year saying Federer is the greatest of all time. I could search and find at least 100 people saying Djokovic, and would find nothing for Federer. Keep coping over those “style points” though

❤ No rating, nö balans, Roger Best All time Tennisist, Maestro King! #1Tennisist ATP Tennis! ✌️

​@@mikemoggerson6651The past is set on stone and we can't change it. If we could tinker with time and placed them both at the same age, their career trajectory would be very different. Djokovic career timing has been to his advantage. Being 6 yrs younger allowed him to build himself up until Federer's level declined enough that when he himself reached his physical peak of around 24 years old he could then rise. Their careers may overlap by many years but Djokovic had a longer run way in his prime years that Federer had to deal with.

@@kweizi5712 Djokovic is mentally tougher and a smarter player than Federer. That’s why he was able to achieve more. Has nothing to do with age. The older player should actually be more experienced in clutch situations, which was the opposite for Federer against Djokovic and Nadal. He was mentally imploding to Nadal even in the mid 2000s. Matches lost with match points: Djokovic-4 Federer-24

​​@@mikemoggerson6651There are so many factors at play that it's not that straightforward. 1. Courts have been slowed down significantly, which plays to the advantage of baseliners like Djokovic and Nadal, especially on service return (one of Djokovic's primary strengths). 2. Djokovic has won 16 out of his 24 grand slams since 2015. Both Federer and Nadal had injuries in 2016, and Murray had his hip injury in 2017. Wawrinka and Del Potro had their injuries in 2017-2018. All these players being out one way or the other have made it much easier for Djokovic. There is no way he could maintain this level if he was constantly having to do 5 setters every grand slam for the last 5 years. 3. In terms of pure skill and talent, there is no question about the fact that Federer is better than Djokovic. The 2019 Wimbledon final is the best example of it, all the stats indicate that Federer should have won. Federer's mental strength being what it is, was the only reason that Djokovic won. All this to say that using stats to determine who the GOAT is is pointless. Watching Federer's game is by far more pleasing than it is to watch anyone else's (Wawrinka when he's in form is a treat to watch as well) There is no other player who is anywhere close to being as complete as Federer is, graceful as Federer is and as creative as Federer is, all with minimal effort.

🤓

Well alcaraz inconsistency ?? He is not only 20 yold Federer at his age was also inconsistency You cannot compare Roger a legend who his carreer is over with kids who just started playing

IW 2017 or Shanghai 2017. Add in WTF 2011, 2007 and a lot more tbh.

@@spiritlance364 I mean in this video!

​@@MarcyTrinidadMaybe he wanted to put more points that people haven't seen as much or ever

Most points here are between 2010-2020 mate.

@@SHVideografie I know, but I hawe to say, 2002-2008 is week era, safin, naibladian, soderling, rodik, Nadal and Novak are greatest

​@@Leonikolic554hmmm Roddick 5-4 Novak, Safin 2-0 Novak, Gonzalez 2-1 Novak..... Sound ridiculous 😂, what weak era hmmm?

@@viveknamikaze761 Novak hawe 19- 20 yours, he is young then,

@@viveknamikaze761 safin, filipisijus, Gonzales, O GS, alkaraz 2 GS, 20 Yours

That last sentence of yours might be one of the greatest understatements I've ever come across. What Federer achieved was nothing but extraordinary.

I believe Federer had the best tiebreak record in the open era until around the early 2010s. His tiebreak performance during his prime years was extraordinary. Even in 2013-2015, he won a lot of important tiebreaks including against Novak. Anyway Novak is definitely the most clutch in pressure moments but Federer was no slouch either. For me Federer remains the GOAT.

I don't think you realize how wrong you are lol. 😅

@@thegreatercornholio8393 Of course, given there played so many amazing champions, like McEnroe, Agassi, Sampras, Connors, my understanding is that to be 2nd/3rd best in history is incredible. I hate when people try to make laugh of Roger calling him the 2nd… I wish all these people to be 2nd in the history of anything they do in life, especially something as worldwide as tennis. : )

@@spiritlance364 Yeah, I think Roger’s mental toughness was ”only” very good, Novak’s is out of this world. I know quite a lot about tennis, I’ve heard stories or players who were champions materials, but didnt even win 1 ATP point, cause they could only do well in practice… So I realize that to achieve what Roger did, it’s simply impossible to be mentally weak per se.

You clearly don’t know tennis if you think Federer still doesn’t have any records in tennis

@@dewman7477 all useless records. Djokovic has most slams, most AO, most masters, most ATP Finals, most year end number 1, weeks at number one. Only record fraudrer has in Wimbledon which will soon fall to novak.

@@aranyaism we’ll see what happens about that at Wimbledon record also tied with Sampras and Connors at us open record too and a bonus of most consecutive weeks at number 1 Also this video isn’t about Djokovic which makes Federer living in your head rent free. If you don’t like Federer then just go away and watch Djokovic all day this video isn’t about goat like you think everything is about

Nope

You were second by like 30 seconds ish

​@@Bowl849Lol