Federer siempre serás el mejor

Le duela a quien le duela

Pretty good match to watch I'd imagine, even from the top!

Must have been a good feeling indeed!

I agree

You know there were 4k cameras back in 1977 right?

@@fredrikdahlin7869 That does not explain why most footage prior to 2000s looks worse than 240p

@@MrDeuceify It depends on who uploads it. Trust us, good cameras have been around for donkeys' years.

Legendary stuff, generational player.

to me, today is faster :P

Rafa and joker wouldnt crack top ten, (and didnt), on courts this fast for the more skilled

​@@carlosm9364 No, courts are much slower today than in 2005.

@@johnbisazza7970 Lol , absolutely delusional especially when talking about Novak . Wouldn't be top 10 lmao ......

The agressiveness from that years was another thing, today is just pass the ball until someone makes an unforced error.

@@ivannunez8738 yep! Totally

@@ivannunez8738I think the surface partly lends to the style that’s successful, if you look at 2005 French open it looks a lot like current hard courts in terms of style that wins

It doesn’t seem that much slower than today. In between around 2010 plus or minus some years, they really slowed it down to an unbearable level

@@richieortiz5 RG was slower back then though

mid 30s Andre was giving him trouble but you can't imagine Novak beating him ? Lol sure .....

Djokovic is a better version of Agassi. He would destroy him

@@blabla-fw9ix Mid 30´s Federer was giving a lot of trouble to younger Djokovic as well...peak mid 20´s Federer would be probably better than that

@@CtiborJasek Maybe , but Novak is a better player than Agassi is , I don't even want to debate that . Prime Novak and prime Roger are closer than a lot of fans think . The faster the surface the bigger advantage Roger has , the slower it is the bigger advantage Novak has but overall Novak is a more clutch player which is why ultimately he came on top more often than not .

@@blabla-fw9ix I can agree with that...the current view is skewed by the fact that Djokovic had the age advantage against Federer in most of their meetings

So aesthetically pleasing to watch.

Against a 36 year old player with two discal hernia?

@@francuadrado7515 but in the final

Nobody shares your thought. Roger was far more aggressive and complete one even compared to the prime Andre.

@@andreaho Prime Andre could beat anyone even by today's standards

Prime Agassi is basically Novak

@@sephsalvador6838 True. With en even faster ball. That guy is the Ronaldhino of tennis, if he had been serious during his career, he would have been number one during ten consecutive years. Sampras said he was the only player he couldn't beat when they were both playing at the top of their game. The difference is the mental Novak has outside the court, the ultimate perfectionist, which may not be always easy to live for his relative as he often says.

You have a valid point there muy friend. But I will say that Novak has a more efficient and varied serve.@@sephsalvador6838

a clueless braindead moron who knows nothing about men's tennis

I observed same thing compared to roger and novak

He had a back injury but no beer belly, what the hell?!

Players didn’t really play at a super high level in their mid 30s before the big 3

Do not forget he played three 5 set marches before getting to the final.. I my opinion he was better player than Federer only lost it becouse he had not much left in his tank..

Novak was 17 at this time mate. He reached uso F in 07 when it was still super fast

y nadal menos.

Just like Federer benefiting from slower courts compared to the 90s. Unsurprisingly, Fedfans gloss over this fact.

Source ? Proof ? You have none, you're saying bs only to cope and you know it. Surfaces started slow down long before Federer even won his first slam.

He had some back issue

​@@awbeltonyeah, but that how he walked.