Understanding NVIS

  Переглядів 46,980

Rohde Schwarz

Rohde Schwarz

День тому

This video explains the fundamental principles of near vertical incidence skywave (NVIS) propagation, including the importance of incidence angle, frequency, and common antenna types.
HF Learning Center: www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/camp...
More information about strategic HF communications: www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/solu...
Need help with Rohde & Schwarz products & services?
Contact Us: www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/m4c/...
Index:
0:36 Review of skywave propagation
1:30 Skip zones
2:14 NVIS overview
3:20 Practical advantages of NVIS
4:25 Operational advantages of NVIS
5:50 NVIS disadvantages
6:33 NVIS frequencies
7:52 NVIS antenna overview
8:55 Elevation and azimuth patterns
11:12 Common NVIS antenna types
15:03 Mobile NVIS antennas
16:46 Skywave vs. Groundwave
17:41 Summary

КОМЕНТАРІ: 54
@DoronTirkel
@DoronTirkel Рік тому
Anyone who is seriously interested in NVIS will benefit from this introduction to the concepts covered. The information is articulated and illustrated clearly.
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
Thanks!
@drdarwin1
@drdarwin1 3 місяці тому
Thank you for the clean and concise information
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 4 дні тому
Thanks!
@VE3IPS
@VE3IPS 2 роки тому
Thanks for the clear and concise explanation of NVIS Propagation theory. The minimal effects from getting jammed is great for the army and the consistent signal quality without fading is useful for digital modes. I have made a lot of contacts on NVIS. Just remember the antenna at 30 ft height brought down to 12 ft height will need shorting to get the swr down. Feel free to make a specific 60m NVIS antenna for example so you can rapidly deploy it without worry 73s VE3IPS
@Batukibatta
@Batukibatta Рік тому
I really admired the detailed presentation . thank you so much for this video .
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
My pleasure - thanks for the feedback!
@CoaxDog
@CoaxDog 2 роки тому
This is an excellent presentation on NVIS. Well done.
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 2 роки тому
Thanks, appreciate the feedback!
@adelarsen9776
@adelarsen9776 Рік тому
Thank you Paul for this refresher. 7 3 de VK4SOE.
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
My pleasure - thanks and 73! Paul, KO4LZ
@PiratePTG
@PiratePTG 2 роки тому
Excellent presentation! I am starting to experiment with NVIS and this has been one of the most well done and informative pieces I have found. Thanks for your time and effort! 73 de KC4YDY
@buckbrown823
@buckbrown823 3 роки тому
Excellent presentation by obvious professionals that can be understood by amateurs.
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 3 роки тому
Actually, quite a few of the "professionals" that work on this (such as myself, KO4LZ) are amateur radio operators as well :)
@Climb1Maintain
@Climb1Maintain Рік тому
Nice introduction!! Thanks you !
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
Thanks - appreciate the feedback!
@BryanWicks
@BryanWicks Рік тому
Once again, a great presentation, this time featuring NVIS propagation and the elements behind the theory. It is only recently that I discovered your channel and have walked away wiser from the quality of your content. This is going to go a long way in helping me construct DIY antennas that will facilitate regional HF communications with known contacts. Shouting out to @TheTechPrepper for illuminating my interest in NVIS, and thank you for the upload!
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
Thanks!
@milton.bolanos
@milton.bolanos 3 роки тому
Very Interesting Tutorial of basics in Propagation
@garyoliver8183
@garyoliver8183 3 роки тому
Excellent presentation...well presented! Thanks.
@DrChazKL0T
@DrChazKL0T Рік тому
Thank you for making such a well organized set of training videos! 73 de KLØT
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
Thanks!
@forgetyourlife
@forgetyourlife 3 місяці тому
Spot on presentation.
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 4 дні тому
Thank you!
@Don008Ramon
@Don008Ramon 4 місяці тому
Thank you that was great !
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 3 місяці тому
Thanks for the feedback!
@joshrg22
@joshrg22 2 роки тому
I have successfully deployed 2 of these in the field. The performance is truly amazing, I am using a 1:1 and 1:9 baluns and SWR is low on several bands. I highly recommend this in mountain terrain
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 2 роки тому
"Amazing" is a pretty good description of NVIS performance in mountainous areas :)
@yidegyismaw6724
@yidegyismaw6724 3 роки тому
It is so interesting
@i5510
@i5510 2 роки тому
Best presentation sir , thanks
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 2 роки тому
Really appreciate the feedback!
@dx398
@dx398 3 роки тому
Wow, thank you for a very impressive presentation on NVIS ! Are those mobile antennas made by Rohde Schwarz ?
@jimh2698
@jimh2698 Рік тому
Very nice. Question: In long range comms, you show refraction but in NVIS you show reflection. I assume refraction is happening because of the ionization having a gradient with most being at lower levels (?) and the wave bending toward the higher density. True? At straight up NVIS there would be no refraction, but the plasma would reradiate (true?). Of course, the NVIS antenna would also be radiating somewhat off vertical, too. Maybe that's why it's called NEAR vertical incidence skywave 🙂
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
Good question. When it comes to the ionosphere, it's not easy to define the difference between refraction and reflection. Both cause a charge in direction due to changes in the propagation medium. For reflection to occur, this change has to be very large (air and a solid object), whereas in refraction it's a somewhat more gradual change. Reflection also requires a large (compared to wavelength) and ideally a flat/smooth object, and the change of direction is usually specular (incident angle = reflected angle). None of these apply to the ionosphere. That said, a lot of people imprecisely talk about signals "reflecting" off the ionosphere, and I'm sometimes guilty of this as well :) Depending on the antenna pattern, height, etc. some of the transmitted signal can (does) travel straight up. NVIS is "near" vertical incidence because a purely vertical incident signal would simply come straight back down and not be useful for communication. Purely vertical incidence is useful when making measurements of maximum usable frequency (e.g. ionosondes) but not for much else :)
@squirlnutsbigsack4864
@squirlnutsbigsack4864 Рік тому
UKposts algorithm why are you always trying to teach me something i learned minimum 20 years ago.
@r6dts256
@r6dts256 3 роки тому
Very important information for me. Regards from UD6AQR
@jerenahw
@jerenahw 2 роки тому
Good Presentation, thanks for the video.
@ghz24
@ghz24 Рік тому
Just because the azimuth and elevation don't change much doesn't mean the polarization is the same. It's still a linear polarized signal and subject to polarization mismatch. Not sure I buy the harder to jam part. From a distance yes from close the jamming party can illuminate the reflective part of the ionosphere with their jamming signal. I'd bet you have to be a ways away before you couldn't be jammed. Even from a good distance a determined jammer could construct a properly elevated dipole to take advantage of the directionality to illuminate the sky above your station even from a couple hundred miles away. I hadn't considered the direction finding resistance but you're right direction finding an nvis ststion would take lots of effort.
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 3 місяці тому
Polarization is usually not preserved once the signal is refracted from the ionosphere, so the best way to deal with (potential) polarization mismatch would be to use a pair of cross-polarized antennas such as the "turnstile" vertical dipole pair shown in the presentation. Jamming is all about efficiency, and it's a lot harder to jam if you can't concentrate power towards the receiving antenna. Yes, you could simply radiate skywards at a high angle but this would distribute the jamming power over a wide area and thus the J/S (jamming to signal) level would also be very low. And NVIS stations can be DF'ed - I actually hold a patent on one methodology (US11550021B2) :) Thanks!
@chrisscott1547
@chrisscott1547 2 роки тому
Good presentation. Must be careful with an inverted L antenna - modelling will show that most of the current can flow in the vertical uplead, resulting in a top-loaded vertical, with attendant low-angle radiation. Making the total wire length => 1/2 wave can help this somewhat.
@rjy8960
@rjy8960 10 місяців тому
Thanks, Chris. I didn't appreciate that.
@rfmonkey4942
@rfmonkey4942 3 роки тому
regards from VK3,,
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 3 роки тому
Tnx es 73, Paul, KO4LZ
@givemanias
@givemanias Рік тому
Could someone tell me if in an inverted V antenna, the ends of the antenna should be how many meters from the ground? Thanks.
@victorb22622
@victorb22622 Рік тому
I have limitation wired inverted V or horizontal dipole, pls suggest any vertical hf antenna design pls.
@victorb22622
@victorb22622 Рік тому
Best of best, though at some point,it was difficult to understand but overall it was informative .want to ask ," difference between angle of radiation/signal and incidence angle. And when it refers angle ,angle from horizon or angle? with vertical?"
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski Рік тому
Incidence angle from vertical (i.e. the angle at which the signal was refracted from the ionosphere)
@h.sapienstechnologicus8865
@h.sapienstechnologicus8865 3 роки тому
I sense proffesionalism
@user-oc5jj7rh4r
@user-oc5jj7rh4r 2 роки тому
Cloud warmer? You can make the rain hard to fall if the cloud is warm or u get warm water?
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 2 роки тому
Good question. I think to warm up water vapor you need energy in the low GHz range, so most HF signals probably wouldn't be able to actually warm the clouds :)
@XPFTP
@XPFTP 6 місяців тому
both stations need to be runnin nvis for good results isnt really true. i run nvis on 75 and out to 300 miles my sig went from a 5 to 10 over from a sloper to a nvis flattop . none of the other stations were running nvis. all info is good tho... what isnt said much is... TRY IT ... GIVE IT A GO... dont take word from anyone on bad or good.. what works for one may not work for other and backwards . basic info is good tho
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 3 місяці тому
Thanks for the feedback - I guess it depends on how you define "good" :) I've personally worked non-NVIS stations with a NVIS antenna and vice-versa, so it can be done, but results are better with similar (vertical) radiation patterns. Thanks again - 73, Paul, KO4LZ
@rfcdgaf
@rfcdgaf 3 місяці тому
I like pronouncing it "EN" VIS hahahhaha nvis sounds weird, like how people would say NVGs
@pauldenisowski
@pauldenisowski 4 дні тому
I've heard "en-vihs", "nih-vihs" and plain old "N -V -I -S" Most of the people I work with pronounce it "nih-vis" and that's why I used that pronunciation in this video.
Understanding VHF Propagation
44:24
Rohde Schwarz
Переглядів 8 тис.
Understanding HF Propagation
20:05
Rohde Schwarz
Переглядів 85 тис.
Что будет с кроссовком?
00:35
Аришнев
Переглядів 2,6 млн
Get a knife! | Standoff 2
01:06
Standoff 2 Live
Переглядів 1,5 млн
Antennas Part I: Exploring the Fundamentals of Antennas - DC To Daylight
13:55
element14 presents
Переглядів 45 тис.
Antenna Wire Length - Demystifying Feedpoint Impedance
18:50
COASTAL WAVES & WIRES
Переглядів 23 тис.
What No One Told You About Amateur Radio
17:55
Ham Radio Crash Course
Переглядів 290 тис.
NVIS Antennas
27:29
WCARES Media
Переглядів 7 тис.
An Introduction to Direction Finding
37:32
Rohde Schwarz
Переглядів 89 тис.
Local Emergency Communications with NVIS - Let's Build an 80m/40m Dipole
17:18
Military HF Radio - Episode 5 - HF Antennas
37:31
Military HF Radio
Переглядів 83 тис.
How do antennas work?
35:31
RCModelReviews
Переглядів 1,5 млн
How an Antenna Works 📡 and more
14:19
VirtualBrain [ENG]
Переглядів 290 тис.
RF Basics for Telecommunication
18:33
Winncom Technologies
Переглядів 24 тис.
M4 iPad Pro Impressions: Well This is Awkward
12:51
Marques Brownlee
Переглядів 5 млн
Samsung UE40D5520RU перезагружается, замена nand памяти
0:46
Слава 100пудово!
Переглядів 3,5 млн
#Shorts Good idea for testing to show.
0:17
RAIN Gadgets
Переглядів 2,6 млн
Why spend $10.000 on a flashlight when these are $200🗿
0:12
NIGHTOPERATOR
Переглядів 17 млн
Портативная PS 5 🎮 #ps5 #expressly
0:22
ExpresSLY Shorts
Переглядів 267 тис.