Oh yes!!! And bring back all those fantastic Ladas!!! 😂🎉

@@jorgeluiscapiello414 Lada Vesta!? Why not, it is a good car! Just keep in mind that Russia also has Aurus...

@@jerromedrakejr9332 Vesta was made with strong collaboration with Renault, french technology. Aurus is not mass produced/exported anywhere, just a few for Putin's motorcade. Get real.

@@jorgeluiscapiello414 You also need to be realistic... you live in the 80's. American superiority in the quality of production has long ceased to exist. Speaking of planes... what happened to that door on the B737 that flew out of the plane in flight a few days ago with an entire row of seats? How many pressurized bulkheads on the B737 did they have to replace a couple of months ago when they discovered sloppy production work... 100 bullheads? 200? What happened to those rubber dampers on the B737 that they didn't screw down so they were sending the planes back to correct the sloppy work? The work on other Boeing planes is no better. US auto industry!? Statisticians say that the reliability of vehicles from American manufacturers is somewhere around 30 places... on par with Chinese manufacturers! Other industrial branches are not better either... Russian planes may use more fuel than American ones, but at least they don't fall out of the sky because they forgot to tighten all the screws in production!

@@jerromedrakejr9332 do you have an idea of how many airplanes are produced by Boeing every year? Then, compare that figure with Russia's. You're delusional.

exactly

I think boeing will resume the sales and maintenance of aircrafts in future as all the nato nations are fed up from supporting Ukraine and sanctioning russia backfired them !!!

Oh my god man, you’re killing me… I haven’t laughed this hard in years.😂😂😂

no russia should not allow Boeing back to its market ever again@@somdattsable5540

@@yurilipkov Actually, it is Russia's unparalleled achievement that is really killing you. Just be honest Yuri 😄😄😄

They aren't old

Les Chinois et les Iraniens préfèrent Boeing.

​@@t.p.8702And ? Naive ...

@@traquecenseurs5423 Until 2030

Will Russia send all its aircraft staff to further invade Ukraine? Why does all go wrong in Russia, maybe look into the mirror: bad leadership? This tech is great, but really, get out of war, Russia seems like Germany in the 1940s; Folks in Georgia and Chechnya would prefer not to be ruled by Moscow. The 'sanctions from the US' are not anti-Russian but pro Ukrainian. Allow Ukraine also to thrive with their air-industry. They already seem to make wonderful drones and have a history in aviation technology. Make peace with the free and democratic Ukraine and choose for a democratic leadership - kick out the current ego and go for democratic. Recognize the difference?

No, they really do not.

Soon it will be twin-engine. They're developing an engine for it, the PD-35.

@@russiapostglobal1589 good !!!! Want to see il-96 and other russian made jets taxing , landing, taking off from indian airports ❤️ From india

They'll probably need the 4-engine one for transatlantic flights, as I doubt the West will give Russia's new planes an ETOPS certification.

They decided to do that only later. It was easier to modernise everything and use upgraded versions of the current 4 configured engine for now, because the time to bring a reliable engine to production is much less. Also Russia has an abundance of cheap fuel. So it balances out. They understand this plane is not aimed for the international market, but for the local market.

Russian reliability makes twins a high risk option

Competent workers in the West🐜🐜🐜, have been replaced with diversity hire 😂

Широкофюзеляжных и дальнемагистральных самолетов эта компания не делает. Делают только небольшие самолёты с импортными двигателями.

You mean copy? Well, they can try… the problem is, they have no production capacity or experience in making many of the parts, in particular electronics, engine components, and composites.

lol were you born in 2005..??before 1990 russia used its own home made aircrafts,russia can make the planes as they have already done so cope harder@@yurilipkov

China is already beating them in that race.

@@antonioramos7139 China todavía está muy lejos de fabricar íntegramente aviones comerciales de fuselaje ancho, el C919 tiene motores occidentales y la aviónica también, en cambio los Rusos se pueden jactar que si pueden fabricar aviones grandes todo con componente local.

@@yurilipkov композиты уже производятся в РФ. MC-21 летает на композитных крыльях

AIR CUBA STILL USES IL96 SINCE 1980 AND STILL THEY FLY WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM AND I NEVER HEARD THAT IL 96 CRUSHED WILE BOEING AND AIRBUS HAD LOTS OF CRUSHES. SO THEY ARE GOOD TO MAKE AIRPLANES. AT KEAST VERY SAFE PLANES.

🤣🤣🤣

Is this that famous AI? Nvidia shares is a huuuge bubble.

Russia has plenty of jet fuel. They can subsidize the price to the airlines.

@@mefobills279 Isn't subsidizing fuel costs kind of admitting the fact that Russia cannot produce modern, fuel efficient jet engines?

@marttijee Russian economy is going gangbusters due to the sanctions. They will be forced to catch up in jet engines. It is all good. In meantime the aviation industry is bein revitalized.

Rome wasn't built in a day. Russia has lost 30 years due to the lack of need to build its passenger planes. But in 10 years their planes will be no worse than Western ones. After all, it is a country that builds great fighters and space rockets. Airplanes are not a big challange.

Yes, and that's why it will not be in mass-production. Only few planes are going to be built. The next generation will have two PD-35 engines.

На самом деле без разницы, т.к. цель номер 1 заместить продукцию западных кидал. А на рынок будут делать новые самолеты.

So do USA, France, Brazil and probably a few others…?

Hello Somalia!🙏🙏🙏

Can make War too.

But for some reason the Airlines buy Airbus and Boeing and Russia imports lots of European Cars. Or at least they did until they invaded another Country.

@@sailplanebob because western things are just better

what about boing .... Their quality level dropped to Chinese quality level....

It is... Which can't be said for Boeing, lately there have been stories that they messed up badly with the pressurized bulkhead on the B737, then there's the story that they messed up some rubber dampers on, you guessed it, the B737, and right now there's a story that they messed up with by installing the doors on, again, the B737, so they flew out together with one row of seats!

Are you on hard drugs?

Really? One old IL-96 with a few updates? Four inefficient engines? No onboard entertainment or internet? Yeah.

It's different class of aircraft.

Nothing that can't be sourced elsewhere.

Which parts?

@@StartledPancake titanium parts

BS@@Nahal0nok

The fact that you did not know about this does not mean that it is not true! There is a whole reportage on a very popular western TV channel that shows the process of building the aircraft in which one section is devoted to Russian titanium parts... What show? Search for yourself...

captive market. also so there is no need for ETOPS certification

It's just a slight update of the IL-96. It's not even new.

Good luck with that. The most highly-educated Russians have left the country because they don’t want to live in a fascist hell-hole run by a brutal dictator.

Well, they've been trying for 70 years. Any idea when it'll happen?

Lots of !!!!!!! won't make it happen Orc.

IL - from Ilyushin. _Sergey Vladimirovich Ilyushin (1894 - 1977) was a Soviet aircraft designer who founded the Ilyushin aircraft design bureau. He designed the Il-2 Shturmovik, which made its maiden flight in 1939._ _It is the most produced warplane, and remains the second most-produced aircraft in history, with some 36,000+ built._ CR929 - situation unclear. Chinese asked Russians to share a lot of technologies, Russia not agreed (big airplanes of such class produce only France, Russia and USA). So, project canceled, then restored. Looks like negotiations are going. But yep, this engine (PD-35) can be installed on IL-96. Engine is developed not for CR929, but for bunch of Russian projects, from new version of An-124 (heaviest cargo plane in world) to future projects.

MC-21 may be translated as mainstream aircraft of 21 century

Nope... It can be only Mississippi-8, Mississippi-17, Mississippi-24, Mississippi-26...

Mutually. Spasibo for the good wishes.

Jealous of what? Streats full of crack heads, robbers and homeless? Usa is colapsing, simple reason corruption, economic, political, social and moral decay.

What exactly is he jealous of?Is the USA so big that no one can do without it?All US developments are stolen ideas from all over the world, as well as luring good engineers from all over the world to the USA.Almost everything invented by the USA is invented by people who received their education outside of the USA.😁😁😁

For the time being is good enough for Russia. They depevelope and keep the national narket for themselves, upgrade their competeces in civil air construction, new jobs are being created, money stay in Russia ; cheap oil and gas are plenty available, so the four engine is still ecomical viable until the new development , the PD35 2 engine, is produced.

4 engines will probably be needed for transatlantic flights as I doubt the West will give Russian planes an ETOPS certification.

для космического корабля не важна экономичность, а для лайнера расход топлива может разделять прибыль и убыток

@@warmike Это ясно как день, друг мой, но... если у тебя есть материалы, станки... разве проблема купить самолёт, разобрать его и сделать такой же... ведь что делают китайцы?

​@@bratislavmilosevic429такой подход не работает без понимания того, как думал конструктор этого самолета.

Russia and China in different weight categories. China can produce everything that is known to science. And Russia is the world of science. Who gave you technologies of 28 nanometers or less? Lithography using ultraviolet radiation was discovered by Russian scientists in 2011. US Patented. Until 2022, recognizing Western patents, we could not produce ourselves and transfer these technologies to third parties. The first prototype is in Russia. Now you are ahead of the US thanks to the Russians. We are already ready for 1 nanometer using X-rays and less than 1 nanometer using synchrotron radiation, which will be released by 2030. The kernel code will be rewritten and the Russian software market will mature by this time. Russia is already in the age of quantum technologies. We discovered quantum particle chaos control in 2021. We are working on Leonov’s works, rewriting physics. The energy of the universe will soon become available. And China is the world's factory for the production of industrial goods. Russia will never engage in this production. Only if we saturate our own Russian market, so as to be independent of anyone.

all is fair in love and war as they say. also not all aircraft were leased. many were owned outright. newer stuff is harder to maintain, but older stuff should have plenty of parts as these planes have been running in russia for the last 30 years.

Россия должна быть честным с кидалой? Спасибо, за 30 лет наелись.😂

Злой диктатор Путин давно объединил отраслевых производителей в гос корпорации (формат, совмещающий гибкость корпораций с административным ресурсом государства. Представляете?). Объединенная авиастроительная корпорация одна из них.

westerners stole everything they have from other countries... you're a thief and a hypocrites

😂😂😂

When? In 10 years. It's already outdated.

It is temporary, they will be replaced with two PD-35 engines. From another side, 4 engines have better reliability. Authorities/army in Russia use only this plane. And will in future even when arrive 2 engines version.

Really? 2030 is still 6 years from now. Russia is now a solid 25 years behind in technology. That'll be thirty. @@juliap.5375

New engines PD 35, ONLY 2 engines...

a plane with 4 engines is safer

@@Rusich945 There are twice as many engines to fail.

​@@johnstuartsmithNOP! Have you heard of the ETOPS certificate? This certificate only exists because of Western demand to use 2 engines. In fact, 4-engine planes don't need it! And because of this certificate, 2-engine planes can't fly straight! Do some research;

😂

Comeback? All they did was modify one old IL-96. They have yet to produce it or the engine it will require.

Composites. Like fan blades. Believe it or not, rocket technology is far simpler when it comes to materials.

banderavite are you hurt..??all that Ukraine produces is hardcore Nazis and drug addicts

No, it's a copy. In the official the plane already flies with two engines.

It appears like one. Since 1950 soviets never produced one airplane which could compete with western technology..

You kid’s soros?!

It's ai voice

ok then let's not try at all.... just leave them bully us and depend on them on their machines.... dude get out of your house

Especially with their nose diving technology (MCAS) that led to the death of hundreds of people.Boeing is second to none.

Boeing? Really? It may USED to be, but after the 737 crashes the whole world realised how this company now works - and not in a good sense!

Russian IL-96 400 aircraft with 4 engines is safer than Boeing and 2 times cheaper. Washington gangsters will never allow the Russians to sell their planes to the West

@@glorious_helpoh let a regional power develop its own planes. Its all fine.

We see American-Canadian support for Nazism, a very similar situation to the 30s of the 20th century. Henry Ford and many other American oligarchs adored and supported the Nazis. Russia's borders were fixed by the Treaty on the Boundaries of Europe in 1975 in Helsinki. Don't worry about neighboring countries. Russia has the legal right to defend itself 6.5 times more than Israel.