thanks

I understand just fine here in the states .. perhaps u should learn

@@user-yi2uv2rb7o Learn the imperial system ?

@@user-yi2uv2rb7o The Metric system is the worlds most used system. Your "feet" and "inches" are only used by north america.

ТЫ ПРОСТО НЕДОУМОК, ЕСЛИ НЕ ПОНИМАЕШЬ В МЕТРИЧЕСКОЙ СИСТЕМЕ, УСПЕШНО ИСПОЛЬЗУЕМОЙ ВО ВСЁМ МИРЕ...

Well, aircraft carriers doesn't go on artic waters, and never go alone or isolated. I would be more concerned about nuclear "things" on submarines, they can navigate everywhere, isolated, and can carry lots of nuclear "things"

hahahah)))) Nuclear chemistry is part of high energy chemistry, a section of physical chemistry - studies nuclear reactions and the physical and chemical processes accompanying them........ Nuclear reaction is the process of interaction of an atomic nucleus with another nucleus or elementary particle.......THIS IS Physical chemistry!!!!!

@@user-jt9mw7wl5q laugh all you want, it doesn't change the fact that nuclear reactors do not use any form of chemical reaction to produce energy and chemistry has nothing to do with nuclear forces. You are taking the name "nuclear chemistry" and twisting it to mean something else. But the branch of science called "chemistry" which deals with chemical reactions, does not deal with nuclear physics. If you look it up it specifically says that "nuclear chemistry" deals with nuclear reactions or the reaction INSIDE the atoms. Chemistry on the other hand deals with reaction BETWEEN the atoms.

@@Sciguy95 The formation of transuranium elements in a nuclear reactor occurs according to the following schemes: 235U + n → 236U + n → 237U →(7 сут)→ 237Np + n → 238Np →(2,1 сут)→ 238Pu 238U + n → 239U →(23 мин)→ 239Np →(2,3 сут)→ 239Pu (+осколки) + n → 240Pu + n → 241Pu (+осколки) + n → 242Pu + n → 243Pu →(5 ч)→ 243Am + n → 244Am →(26 мин)→ 244Cm HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH)))))) IS THIS PHYSICS? CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS TOGETHER.... ONE DOESN'T PROCEED WITHOUT THE OTHER.....

@@Sciguy95It's a sub-field in both chemistry and physics.

Same

Take a woman to an Arctic cruise on one of such icebreaker. You will then be breaking ice both literally and figuratively speaking at the same time! 😅

😂 funny

Big funny.

LOL, top tier comment.

@@antonh1709 I'm afraid they won't appreciate my offer :( they prefer carribbean or big cities.

You have your gender ideology :)

Канада - отсталая страна

Canada have LGBT idea

That's cuz Canada is a US vassal. Pretty much a US State. Until US wants to invest in Nuclear ice breakers, Canada won't have any.

You get Trudeau. 😂😂😂

2500000 рублей с человека стоит круиз на ледоколе на Северный полюс. Билеты есть в продаже на этот год.

Might as well be traveling on a submarine or on a spaceship - just emptiness all around, as far as the eye can see. The main thing you'll be experiencing is the interior of the ship.

@@user-cd9zp9fm8d Too expensive for me Слишком дорого для меня

@@manofsan yeah - a long trip would get boring. For a short time it would be interesting to see that open vast empty place. When the weather is 'good', being on deck to hear and see the ice crunch would be an experience.

@@georgewashington938 end for me.🤣

For some reason I thought of the people who do ice baths going swimming in there😅

That’s one of the reasons they took crimea back

For this purpose, the icebreakers of project 22220 are being built, there are 7 of them in the project, 3 have been built, another Leader is on the way, and there are still 7 pieces, and these are only nuclear, not counting diesel ones.

Спасибо друг . Все верно сказано . У нас есть флот таких кораблей и его ждут пополнения.

Что случилось с лодкой Курск? Она утонула 😂

What else did you expect from a cheap Russian propaganda video?

And their army is the most elite, modern cutting edge…haha

@@Clydesirota this is actually true

@@ClydesirotaRussia and China are embarrassing the west. The west is in Decline. Asia and Africa will rule 21st century onward.

What lead?

Nuclear is clearly the future currently... though a problem... it solves alot of immediate issues.

Arktika is the first nuclear icebreaker built in Russia after USSR collapse, so it must look different from it's predecessors.

It's long dude and it's getting boring. What's more, you can't smoke.

Все в ваших руках. Желаю вам удачи .

167.64 meters. Courtesy of conversion programs that are free and easy to use on the internet.

what does that say for those with fewer and less powerful icebreakers?

we kinda all use those open routes the same as the soyuz not everybody is against cooperation

You think these commies are going to be any better?? They still have Ww2 tanks in use. Ffs. They can’t get anything right

1 foot = 30.48cm

Only in America you do.....

In burgers

good question

​@@science-channel In order to prevent ice from sticking to the sides, pneumatic washing is used - there are many holes on the body through which air bubbles are supplied to prevent ice from sticking. But hot water, the mention of which can be found in some sources, is not used for driving in ice. On the icebreaker "Russia" experiments were made with heating the hull in the bow area, but they turned out to be completely useless. True, when parked in ice, the ice around the icebreaker melts - which is not surprising, since 20,000 tons of sea water is required to cool all systems per hour, which at the same time heats up to 25 ° C. At the same time, the decks are completely heated so that the ice does not freeze and it would not have to be removed

Nope. The amount of energy for that will be just enormous... Pneumatic machines (bubble generators) are much cheaper, efficient and they also generate 'repulsive forces' that push pieces of broken ice away from the ship's hull.

WORLD largest and fastest way to melt ice is IceBreakers. This is why Ice is melting faster now.

It's all stollen US tech 🇺🇸

I like the teef on the bow

Another cold war between NATO, EU, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Canada + SUA ( western ) and BRICS ( eastern ) countries ongoing .

That not saying much lol slava ukraini

like what?

It would just stuck in that iceberg probably

ice-berg would break

There is no icebergs in North Ocean. Icebergs break off the glaciers of Greenland and are carried by sea currents into the Atlantic Ocean...

​@maksimluzin1121 I am amazed at the ignorance, hahaha, I always read your posts, you know your shit

They do NOT go that way.... it is for to new trade on the North part of the Russia and can deliver all their trade and business ... this one is not for to go further .... but the other top 5 Nuclear carrier one is know where to drive and which 'road ' and there is not Ice-berg

В России, атомные ледоколы. Google в помощь

Yeah, people are still saying thats going to happen in "15-20 years" lol Ive been hearing them say that since the 90s.

​@@SvendleBerriesin the 90s scientists told us that they are Not Sure If the Ice will in the Arctic completly clear Up in the Summer by 2100. New evidence and Tests Show that it will definetly Happen by 2100 but Most likely before 2050.

Он тает, а потом снова замерзает.

I see only one reason why you crow about it. The United States has 2 under-icebreakers and one of them is ALWAYS under repair.

What country are you from? I'm just wondering where the level of education is so low?

Are you high or smth? 😂 Russians literally stole or bought all their technology from the West Without the American and German help Russia would still be in it’s natural Medieval stage of development

Debil

There are around 50 of those functioning constantly. Don't forget Russian fleet of atomic subs. I'd say Russian reactors are good, Chernobyl was long ago

@@iansysoev9462 Чернобыль - дело рук МИ6/ЦРУ

WORLD largest and fastest way to melt ice is IceBreakers. This is why Ice is melting faster now.

Only in west

@@paulkpogo4752 and the east

@@hyy3657 Nowhere, actually. At least "manmade" climate change. Or "global warming" as it used to be called, until they changed the terminology because it kept snowing when it wasnt supposed to. If "climate change" were an actual problem, they would be endlessly hounding India and China, yet they only ever shake their fists at the west. Its bogus.

What happened to the acid rain and the global warming?

whats wrong with the title? It is true

Here's another idea - look up some numbers about high-voltage cable resistance and how much power is being lost due to it.

Too expensive- watch Russia sizes))

@@dimbasz - thanks, i took your advice and looked it up. it only proved how ignorant you are. there are already projects planned to span long distance. Yet, another troll, wannabe with no intelligence or knowledge desperate for attention.

If, according to Greta, yes.

Фукусима рулит

I see only one reason why you crow about it. The United States has 2 under-icebreakers and one of them is ALWAYS under repair.

Chernobyl is Ukrainian disaster.

Curios,usa dont stop after three mile island accident)

Ever heard about the Three Mile Island incident? the US had its own Chernobil, they just prefer not to speak about it.

Против кого их там проводить? Против белых медведей? Северный путь развивают, чтоб вести более эффективную торговлю, и всякие "борцы за свободу мореплавания" не мешали.

Говорят в дурдоме валенки е6ут и кашей умываються.

Dude it is doing fine 😂😂😂.

Иди оплачивай коммунальные услуги

Russian economy is growing more than ever

What have the United States achieved with its SUPEReconomy? The military budget is 10 times more than the Russian one. And what is the result? The US supersonic missile program was canceled - there are not enough brains. New ships - Zumwalt, for example - garbage. US Abrams tanks are afraid to give Ukraine, so as not to disgrace. Nuclear missiles - Minutemen extend the life - did not come up with anything new - there are not enough brains. What is the conclusion from everything - money - NOT BRAIN.

Two weeks ago World Bank said that Russian economic became 5th in world. It growing. Moreover, Russian debt is one of the lowest in world, Russia have positive trade balance (sell more than buy), so each year it becoming only richer (and already have hundreds thousands of billions as surplus money; even after West stole year ago $300 billions from Russia)

Not when you have the West lusting after your resources

The US is all about war not Russia

If you look at Russias and why it’s military is not outgunning Ukraine it’s because it doesn’t spend to much on its military. That’s the one thin Putin said he would not do and that is following the USSR down the track of overspending on the military. It’s why Russia has not produced a lot of its new equipment such as the T-14 , SU-35 in large numbers. The reverse is the USA which over spends and is looking for wars to keep its defence industry operating

how America will reduce the number of bases around Russia and China, then we'll talk. For understanding, America has more than 800 pieces, England has about 140, Russia has 20.

Russia fighting the Nazis is a very good thing!

WORLD largest and fastest way to melt ice is IceBreakers. This is why Ice is melting faster now.

I knew that Ukie fan boys were stupid. But you exceeded all expectations.

Keep it intellectual friend

@@vulgarisopinio Brother, trust me, this is the most adequate one.

Slava Cocaine 🤡

Your information is highly suspect

Lol did you not see that the sanctions on Russia helped them economically because they made new deals/contracts with other countries...?

@@Marshall-sb7olwhat kind of deals and countries

China wouldnt be able to afford that. Their economy is falling apart and would be more of a liability as a partner.

@@Grisuu Trade deals with SE Asian countries.