Not for many. Internet has taken wonder, humility, humanity, and blended it all into an apathetic, asocial mush of ‘memes’ and permanently ‘ironic’ cynicism.

@@tubecated_development speak for yourself

@@tonyperdicou7389 no, I’m speaking for those many I encounter on the Internet

@@tubecated_development Well, not to mention the Grifters who convinced them it's all a lie.

@@MyOuterHaven It sounds so rediculous...but so is this whole thing we call Life. But that ignores the Math and visual proof we can do ourselves, lol.

i wish the atlas version of the RL-10 had the extension, seeing it deploy is really cool

I guess having a longer interstage was out of the question?

Ok thanks for the dad comment

​@allEyezOnDelphi you are welcome son

@@josephastier7421 The shorter a rocket's inter stage is the better. Long inter stages tend to be really heavy, which lowers the amount of payload you can lift. Also because inter stages are hollow, longer inter stages tend to endure significantly higher loads and stresses during launch making them weaker than shorter inter stages.

It only took till very end but we got there!

It's been done for ages. 🤦 Stop watching flat earther channels.

🤦🤡

The Apollo 11 had cameras inside of the stages that filmed separations... then ejected and parachuted back to earth and were recovered... That was on July 16th 1969... there was no desire to "film " from the outside due to obvious restrictions and limitations...

Who would have thunk that they had CGI...........back in the 1960's huh?

The hell, you say!

Well who knew? 😂

Its thick, boi! We all knew it!

That’s because this is CGI to make you think it’s round. Wake up. EDIT: FFS please stop trying to fight me in the comments. This is a JOKE. Surely nobody thinks this is serious, or that the earth is flat 🤦‍♂️

Ok, grab a small ball. Like a golf ball or something. Find a flat surface of 6 feet or longer. Bring your eye down to where you can no longer see the top surface. Now roll the ball and witness what happens. That's right, you just witnessed how the sun sets and rises on a plane. In this scale. you don't have to contend with atmospheric contamination which makes the atmosphere itself one giant lens that maintains its apparent size. Too bad the globe theorists failed basic geometry. Now grab some iron, a magnet, some metal wire, a metal stand, and a torch. First, wrap the wire around the iron. Next, tie the wire to the stand or hang it from something so it can be heated with the torch. Attach the magnet to the iron. Now pay attention to what happens when you heat the iron until it glows red. That's right, the magnet drops! Congratulations! You just proved what science claims the Earth's core is and how it works wrong. Too bad the globe theorists weren't informed about the Curie point. This one will vary depending on the sink design. Most noticeable in round sinks, though it will work in all of them. Ok, grab 2 full glasses of water. Go to your sink and put 1 glass on each side. Now take 1 glass and pour it on the left front wall and watch it drain clockwise. Take the other glass and pour it on the right front wall and watch it drain counterclockwise. The left rear wall will also drain counterclockwise while the right rear wall will drain clockwise. Congratulations! You just witnessed both Coriolis effects in the same hemisphere! Too bad the globe theorists didn't understand momentum very well. Plane Earth class dismissed!

Makes you wonder how engineers tune the areo without testing to have them not bounce back into each other after they've gone!

@@actually5004 They just burn up in the atmosphere so it doesn't matter if they hit each other i guess

Nasa uses green screens with toy rockets to film these fakes, like Hollywood films. Wake up, space is a big HOAX!!!!

Hey, for maximum "thrust", you know it! 😆🍆

Strap-on boosters.

Frighteningly large strap-ons

Yep. "Strap ons", "Strap on solids" "Strap on boosters"

Oh yes, massive strap-ons, with no sense of embarrassment!

Imagine keeping flat-earthers as friends.

I correct them when they suggest something so rediculous.

Sorry, this won't dissuade flat earthers! The masters of nuh uh.

Yea, they will just say C G I.

I really believe flat Earthers know damn well the Earth isn't flat, they do what they do for attention seeking.

Thats what im thinking! How come i can speak to people on the other side of the world through discord on my iphone 6 loud and clear but literal space agencies have sound quality like it was the 1950s 😅At this point they gotta be doing it cause it feels cool 😂

Maybe they are sending the audio to the rocket and back to earth just to add a geek factor. 😋

There is no audio transmission from the rocket. It's just a bad recording from mission control.

Probably the settings on the Vox mic 🎤

Wow a rocket that works and doesn’t tumble out of control..

I'm curious about this too. Maybe there is still "some" atmosphere up there and with the increased velocity at higher altitude maybe the charring is caused by some friction with the very thin atmosphere?

At 100 km there’s still a bit of atmosphere left. The radiation levels are far too low to cause blackening at that rate.

Hydrogen gas residue

Aerodynamic dead zone where the unignited gases linger and burn off

Yes; it's normal, and the Hydrogen gas burning before liftoff is deliberate. It avoids a potentially explosive situation, similar to what SpaceX encountered with at least one of their early prototype Starship launches.

Constant improvement is not United Alliance culture. Will be challenging.

NASA opted not to reuse the craft. It was deemed cheaper to simply make new ones. Rest assured NASA could land and reuse their crafts. Elon / space X has done nothing special at all.

@@walsterdoomit They did: Space Shuttle. The difference is that the Shuttle took about billion dollars to service after each flight, and SpaceX do it without any freeloaders taking advantage of them financially.

@RWBHere they opted to not reuse boosters. But you can change the topic if you like. I for one trust nasa over musk the taxpayer funded freeloader. Elon is a con.

Geostationary orbit, so slower gravity turn.

It starts at 4:08, and is very obvious.

That would make sense: That connection point is attached to cryogenic tanks at both ends, you’d want to make sure it’s not frozen shut when you jettison the boosters.

Fall into the ocean. No where near fast enough to orbit or burn up.

@@wally7856 Cheers for that. Gee you wouldn’t want to be sailing along and get clobbered by one of the boosters.

@@OurWorldbyDronein4K They have an ocean exclusion zone for boats so they don't get clobbered.

that's live from the control room; the voice you hear is from somebody monitoring datas, not this video. Ask if you don't know, think before comenting.

Probably debris glinting

Splash, splash!

Why? When you want to have that view, just look up, nothing to see there. However, here a video of a Space Shuttle launch with a camera viewing forward ukposts.info/have/v-deo/spime62IqG2iu58.html

ULA have a new rocket, it’s called Vulcan. It has already launched its first payload.

Shadow of the exhaust plume.

Thats an aerodynamic dead zone where unignited gasses build up and burn

They'll just shout nuh uh and cgi and round lens or round eyeball or round magical magnetic something...

Orville: "HOLY ! ..." Wilbur: " ... FUCK !"

That's nothing, we put a man in the air and landed him safely.

@@skipsassy1 Daily, on scheduled flights

You didn't watch the whole video. They showed light up.

Well, but watch one of meanwhile 280 successful landings of SpaceX Falcon rockets to realize, that rockets don't have to be thrown away but can be reused.

@@sebastiannolte1201 I realized that about 30 years ago when it was done the first time. Called DC-X.

@@sebastiannolte1201They get reused every time they don’t explode. What’s the score?

@@tubecated_development Do you mean how often the landings fails? That doesn't happen often, here all flights of 2023. All are green: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#2023

Was wondering the same thing........

The fire between boosters is caused by vented H2 igniting upon engine startup. This we are told is a feature of the Delta 4 Heavy, not a bug,

It’s being replaced with a new rocket, the Vulcan.

Nice try, but you’re not going to convince anyone here that those are anything other than strap-ons.

Not solid rocket boosters..all 3 are liquid fuel.. liquid hydrogen and oxygen.....but strap ons is still a strange name..lol.

They built them.. They can call THEM WHATEVER THEY WANT..

The strap-ons lol

We’re looking at daylit Earth, so the exposure time is on the order of 1/1000 second. Try taking photos of stars and satellites with that exposure time: you will get completely dark photos.

satellites are hundreds and thousands of kilometers away, why should you see them? And what does "breaking the atmosphere" mean? It launches in the atmosphere and goes up. And the atmosphere just get thinner and thinner with the altitude

A vacuum requires a solid barrier

@@paulbutler9719 LOL, just spitting out the typical nonsense, so parroting what you have seen some where. What's comes next, that water always find its level? Haven't you really notice, that the air pressure becomes thinner fluently when you go higher? I mean, you easily can feel and measure that. Before GPS , altimeters only worked by measuring the air pressure. So we have an air pressure of 1013 hPa at sea level. At the top of Mount Everest only 325 hPa. So how can 1013 hPa exist next to 325 hPa without a solid barrier? You don't have a problem with that? At 20 km it is 78 hPa, at 50 km it is 165 Pa, at 100 km it is 0.3 Pa, halfway between moon and earth 0.000000001 Pa, deep in outer space it is 0.000000000000 Pa. So where should that barrier be?

@@paulbutler9719 No, it doesn’t. It requires a physical barrier OR a force that prevents gases from flowing into the vacuum. Gravity provides that force for planetary atmospheres.