Konsi uni se? Yes that and also it's known as the widow maker the main supply of blood and existence and Allah is closer than that

This is called confirmation bias and post-hoc rationalizing. You're simply reinterpreting the verse by finding a way to correlate it to something you're familiar with. People do this all the time when talking to a fortune teller. The fortune teller will say something vague, and the client will subconsciously "match" it to something in their life. Critical thinking is very difficult.

@@iiddrrii6051 even if you are correct on this bias, there are sufficient other proofs that the Quran is without a doubt and unquestionably the word of God, I invite you to explore it!

@@iiddrrii6051lol does a fortune teller have divine verses?

@@Skinnymoss81 I’m sorry, first of all that’s circular reasoning. Secondly. Are you familiar with confirmation bias?

SubhanAllah

Yeah, that was awesome. MashaaAllaah. I will stick to the ships. You guys do the flying. Heights.@@fawadkhan2953

Same is for space. Watch There is no clash by Clare Forestier

This is just post-hoc rationalizing. I'm sorry, heavier than air - aircraft are not "buoyant". They don't "float" through the air. The wings accelerate air downward and create lift. In fact, lighter than air aircraft have their own classification. They include balloons and blimps which are filled with heated gas or helium.

​@@iiddrrii6051stop your nonsense!

And it all comes from a single book that hasnt been changed or revised in the slightest. Truly the words of god

Exactly!!! 🔥

I take the explanation of Ibn Abbās Over this man any day. This will open the door to people interpreting the Quran as they wish. The Companions have already explained the Quran and Allah is pleased with them. Stick to the sayings of those who were explained to by the Prophet peace be upon him. This is opening up the door to fitnah

@@rafaelsantiago9624 well said .

@@rafaelsantiago9624 true true

Aameen. Yeah, he is one of a kind and breaks down everything.

سبحان الله! ❤️

is he a salafi/wahabi scholar??

@@zmuzamil1025 From an academic perspective, there is no such thing as "wahabi scholar".

⁠​⁠​⁠@@zmuzamil1025 Muhammad Asad, (Arabic: محمد أسد, Urdu: محمد اسد, born Leopold Weiss; 2 July 1900 - 20 February 1992 was an Austro-Hungarian-born Jew and convert to Islam who worked as a journalist, traveler, writer, linguist, political theorist, diplomat. (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Asad) One of the finest intellectuals of Islam in modern times.

Aaameen summa summa aameen.

He doesn't. All he does is demonstrate that he is hypnotized, brainwashed, indoctrinated with the BIGGEST lie in the world, too.

Not really, that’s a weak proof for the roundness of the earth it’s actually flat. Many verses talk about the flatness of the earth

@@yaseenrasputin8826 Quran already stated that earth is like ostrich egg shaped and if allah should also mention earth is flat because quran is revealed 1400 years ago... So for them to understand and be grateful it should be stated flat. If there is no flateness in earth then we couldnt build buildings,vehicles cant have proper balance and less friction will make difficult for even walking

​@@yaseenrasputin8826 You scrolled all the way to reply 😂

@@mohammedmunavar2977 I’m sorry I don’t understand what you’re saying. And no the Quran didn’t mention that earth is shaped like ostrich eggs. There is something about how Allah made the earth shaped like the surface where an ostrich lays its eggs if that’s what you mean : "و الأرض بعد ذلك دحاها" That word means the same thing that the ostrich does to earth when it wants to lay its eggs.

This man is nice, may Allah guide him further, but his arguments are not thought out with enough care. I meditated on this verse as well last year when I had to learn how to graze some livestock. I began reciting these verses in my solah. I read the whole surah a few times as well. I was very interested and very impressed. I believe I can say I was humbled by Allah subhaanahu wa ta’ala, due to the greatness of his wisdom and his guidance. I also felt that the qasd in qasdussabiil was about the animals guiding us, because they often knew where the best grass was better than I did. They would look at me and were inclined to trust me for direction at other times. There were in fact times when I knew better than them where the choice leaves were, or the choice grasses. Maa shaa Allah, it showed me that Allah had made it so. That is, that Allah subhaanawata’ala had given us each a share of the task. He has in fact given us a shared task, not just a share of the task. If the goat stops walking and stares at you, then you pick some forage for it, it will continue to look for that same forage thereafter. It has been subdued under us. Taskheer, I believe this is. Allah subhaanahu wa ta’ala has made it so, yet as the scholar points out, pur modern machines cannot ease the amanah for us, and He said inna robbakum la ro’uufurraheem. Yet this dear scholar has said in another interview that Muhammad doesn’t sin and this is wrong. Someone please connect him to me, I would like to show him in shaa Allah.

@@abdullahreed7200 prophet Muhammad ﷺ doesn’t sin this is according to most scholars

@@majormalarkey8342 This may be the opinion of scholars but is not factual. Muhammad sinned and that is one of the steps in the way he perfected his relationship to Allah. We repent. We repent because we sin. We ask forgiveness for sin. We do that because we sin. The prophet is reported to have said that he would repent to Allah 70 times a day. It is fundamental. The false understanding that Muhammad did not sin is a big mistake.

@@abdullahreed7200 "I would like to show him" Brother, I hope you find your moment with him someday, but the shaykh is one of the most knowledgeable Muslim scholars on Earth. You will discuss with him in sha Allah, but don't hope to "show him" something, he has probably seen it all already and will have a point to make during that discussion with you. Stay humble, his opinions are as valid as yours, if not more.

@@le-manche-de-pelle Allah knows with perfect and He revealed to us thjngs that we can know black and white. While I’m not upset by the acceptance or rejection of truth by anyone, anywhere, as it is the free right of every person to believe what they may, it is disappointing to see that you have discussed the process of knowledge acquisition without promoting a sound method for it.

I'm with you 100% brother.

He is a true man of perception. Great minds recognize each other. God praises such minds in the Quraan. :)

@@ARmirzaful Jazakallah khair brother 🤍

Refer to tafsir ibn kathir for its interpretation its a credible tafsir based on the understanding of the companions and theyre followers and dont take this newly made up interpretation

Astaghfirullah. Have some respect for this incredible scholar. You wouldn't dare debate him if he were in front of you.

@@Ummfatimah404 Hes not a scholar. Hes an ashari. Asharis are an innovated sect that came up much later from the time of the companions...

I seek refuge in Allah from being of the ignorant folk.

@@Ummfatimah404 May Allah Azza Wa Jal guide you to the correct understanding so you can know the true scholars are who follow the way and understanding of the sahaba.

Keep crying

Mudhari3 is used for both present and future.

Yes it represents the imperfect tense ie present and future. If a seen is attached then it’s specifying the future

​@@a_fortiori_ without the seen attached, it can also refer to future

@@le-manche-de-pelle my comment does not contradict that

@@a_fortiori_ didn't mean to contradict you either, I'm adding depth to your comment because it might help someone

Dont compare arabs with any one else

@@med.othman This sheik have the most knowledge and he is mauritanian, muftimenk is also mauritanian, dr zakir naik is indian, The top people of islam are not arabs but we shouldnt compare, we are one ummah

@@hahaloser3914 Mauritania is an Arabic county..I’m Mauritanian too my brother we are arabs.

@@med.othman oh i didnt know that,my fault

He is not denying other tafasir, he is adding depth to them. Not the same thing. Also, mufassiroon were humans and made mistakes at some point or didn't have the knowledge to understand the full scope of a verse. We cannot claim we came up with a legit understanding unless it is peer-reviewed and accepted amongst scholars

@@le-manche-de-pelle Islam is Quran, Sunnah according to the understanding of the first three generations. You cannot come up with new things to fit your era. In a 100 years someone might come and try to explain his world using the same ayat

@@le-manche-de-pelle Okay akhie. As you wish

And I missed the point of your comment

@@le-manche-de-pelle it was trying to say that i was expecting a better estekhraj from a professional mojtahid like brother al-didu than a point that has been extensively noted and discussed in translations and tafseers. I thought he had discovered code 91 or something

@@MPier yeah, blame is to be put on the title of the video. To me, this just sounded like normal tadabbur, but there was nothing I could disagree with. Overall, somewhat interesting and very much clickbaity

Pilots feel like their trajectory may be straight, but they trace an arc that has a radius of around 6400km even on a straight path. This radius is so big that on the human scale, we can't notice it.

@@le-manche-de-pelle Pilots feel like... It's ridiculous. Do they have to dip as they fly? No, they don't. The surface is then flat. There's no other way.

@@abdelw how does it feel to be completely deluded? You and logic are ⬅️ ➡️

There is literally a pilot in the comments who verified everything he said. Check for urself ....

a pilot in the comment section verified everything this sheik said,check it for yourself

yeah exactly, subhanallah

No he is a sufi mushrik who asks his sufi shaykh to spit on him for tabarruk and everything he says is against the manhaj of the Salaf, including when he called the scholars of tafsir irrelevant in this video. You can find evidence and refutations against him on UKposts, see Shaykh Muzammil Faqiri refutation videos with evidence.

@@joyboy7464he is not sufi you will be acconted for that …you can’t imagine the amount of sin you made

He is not soufi he is selafi sunni maliki

@@med.othman Nothing I said was incorrect, you can search for refutations online and you can find his own words opposing the salaf on his channel, for example when he talks about where Allah is, everything he said it against the aqidah and the manhaj of the Salaf so it's upon you to prove that he is 1) not a mushrik 2) not a sufi kabeeth 3) that he follows the salaf You will not be able to do so

what is their explanation, explain it to me or link it?

Ahmadya are misguided people

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a liar

How so?

@@Thrawnio the earth isn’t a ball spinning around the sun the earth doesn’t move as allah subhanah said: ﴿اللَّهُ الَّذي جَعَلَ لَكُمُ الأَرضَ قَرارًا وَالسَّماءَ بِناءً وَصَوَّرَكُم فَأَحسَنَ صُوَرَكُم وَرَزَقَكُم مِنَ الطَّيِّباتِ ذلِكُمُ اللَّهُ رَبُّكُم فَتَبارَكَ اللَّهُ رَبُّ العالَمينَ﴾ [غافر: ٦٤] (64) It is Allāh who made for you the earth a place of settlement and the sky a structure [i.e., ceiling] and formed you and perfected your forms and provided you with good things. That is Allāh, your Lord; then blessed is Allāh, Lord of the worlds.

@@yaseenrasputin8826 where does it specify your fake theory ?

@@yaseenrasputin8826 Stop spreading ignorance brother. Your misinterpretation of the verse does not mean anything. Allah does not mention the shape of the Earth as it is not relevant. However, the humanity - as well as Muslims - has come to find that it is round. You are nobody in terms of knowledge in comparison to Sheikh Dido, so saying ''but the Earth is flat man'' based on your misinterpretation of a verse without any tafseer or background is invalid.

@@lucidniprogramer589 stop spreading false information yourself. Sheiks of our days try to come up with tafseers for the verses that go with NASA and the infidel scientists. Go search about shaykh ibn baz and shaykh ibn othaymin and ibn kayyim. Not only these shaykh convinced me about the shape of the earth but also years of research even from people outside the Islamic world, people who use logic and common sense not just follow old satanic scientists blindly. so don’t accuse me of ignorance brother. But I’m just gonna ask you a question, why does Allah mention that earth is flat in more than 5 verses but never mentioned that it’s flat?

The problem is having the mentality that the scholars of the past were right about everything.

​@@SELFMOTIVATION007 العلم السلف افضل من العلم الخلف.

May Allah protect us from people who argue and accuse like they breathe

من انت لتطعن الصبح فيه كم ركعة… يا اخي روح ادرس هدا الشيخ مو مستواك 😂

Do you think robots that are created by other robotics components are made by robots or by humans ?

Shut up pajeet, you're probably trying to refer to ikhwan when you said "igwani", shut your jaahil self up and go do something productive, guaranteed you've never listened to a lecture of Rabee since you can't understand Arabic

Hey kid, be respectful. Being argumentative when talking about the religion and throwing unfounded accusations is not an islamic behaviour. "Many times refuted" is not a measurement unit of a scholars' knowledge and status. When imam Abu Hanifa and imam Malik were discussing in imam Malik's chambers, I expect they both refuted each other many times. And better than this, it happened face to face, not remotely in a UKposts video. Doesn't take anything away from any of them.