Starship | SN15 | High-Altitude Flight Test

  Переглядів 5,684,547


As early as Wednesday, May 5, the SpaceX team will attempt a high-altitude flight test of Starship serial number 15 (SN15) - our fifth high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from Starbase in Texas. SN15 has vehicle improvements across structures, avionics and software, and the engines that will allow more speed and efficiency throughout production and flight: specifically, a new enhanced avionics suite, updated propellant architecture in the aft skirt, and a new Raptor engine design and configuration.

Similar to previous high-altitude flight tests of Starship, SN15 will be powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN15 will perform a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype will descend under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps are actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enable precise landing at the intended location. SN15’s Raptor engines will then reignite as the vehicle attempts a landing flip maneuver immediately before touching down on the landing pad adjacent to the launch mount.

A controlled aerodynamic descent with body flaps and vertical landing capability, combined with in-space refilling, are critical to landing Starship at destinations across the solar system where prepared surfaces or runways do not exist, and returning to Earth. This capability will enable a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration, interplanetary flights and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

Given the dynamic schedule of development testing, stay tuned to our social media channels for updates as we move toward SpaceX’s fifth high-altitude flight test of Starship!

Brock Springer
Brock Springer Годину тому
It’s the big falcon
prince kumar
prince kumar 10 годин тому
Make a machine which make human free from any diseases within a second or a minute,
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 5 годин тому
starship is that
Nahyan Akil
Nahyan Akil 17 годин тому
Launch on year 2046 if yo launch on that year so there are more technology to live on mars and on other planets
Ob Fuscated
Ob Fuscated 17 годин тому
DoD will be forced to copy the concept since this is an example of a private party building a civilian aerospace vehicle superior to every conventional bomber ever built and most ever dreamt. That payload size will (because necessity ensures someone somewhere will do it the US will be compelled to develop combat overmatch) make a spectacular Strategic Rocket Bomber. US versions could sit Alert in CONUS, HI, AK Guam etc providing global reach with conventional weapons of single (rare but possible like large conventional or thermobaric ordnance), multiple and multiple heterogeneous systems ready for immediate launch since UNlike ballistic missiles they may be recalled like obsolete manned conventional bombers whose "stealth" is ephemeral and which can be shot down by any modern fighter unless escorted to target (which delays launch much, much more). Payloads could employ any suitable munitions including Lazy Dog style cheap kinetics too many and dense for enemy defense (and dirt cheap) which could be augmented with ablative coatings to delay laser kills thus enabling sibling projectiles (along with hot balls atmospherically formed of any lasered metal) to reach target. Scatter could be controlled by well-understood cluster dispenser systems and cluster pods could also contain an appropriately suppressive mix to (for example) provide rapid viable "strike with system near-impunity" from above against an invasion fleet, ground units and buried systems. The rocket itself could be used as a kinetic munition against sufficiently valuable targets (conventional strike missions can easily compare in cost to a Starship and cost much more when aircraft are lost, affordable freight implies delivery of any payload). Closing mountain passes etc could be done by deploying drone swarms with any mix of drones permitting terrestrial loitering to deter enemy advances or disrupt them. Deterrent missions can be flown since the system is safely recallable. Just knowing one or a squadron is overhead is considerable deterrent. Consider how many strikes flown by small, slow vulnerable jet fighters (they're small and slow as a broken moped compared to a rocket carrying 100 tons) it took to take down Iraqi systems and (mostly fail to) hunt Scud TELs. Then consider the option to deploy omniscient systems of systems with immediate target saturation vs. flying bombers from Diego Garcia or other safe havens MANDATED by slow, vulnerable-to-anyone-with-an-Air Force or modern SAMs. Heavy rockets are the natural evolution of strategic bombers because they restore most advantage fast bombers once had over slower fighters while forcing opponents to build their own overmatch which few could manage and those are rational actors. That tool will not be left in the toolbox because it's conventional, recallable, versatile, offers better global reach, loiter options and firepower than any system (it makes SR-71 look like a T Model Ford by comparison) and will be cheap to produce thanks to NOT being a DoD invention. Unlike complete meatbags-in-cockpit systems it need not be constrained in development (for area denial purposes anyway) when operated remotely and eventually (also unavoidable because laws do not enforce themselves so force trumps law) autonomously controlled as an option/deadman switch when on combat sorties. (If it's not coming home anyway or should not because it's loaded wasting valued assets over enemy targets is gross military negligence.) Large cargo rockets could also deploy smaller "fighter" rockets like smaller human-free versions of Dream Chaser with their own payloads for dispersed attack operations to overload enemy systems while avoiding bringing the large vehicle close enough to hit. Re-entry of Dyna Soar (great job, old NASA!)-like vehicles could make tracking more difficult. Though modern systems can detect rockets that doesn't mean they aren't capable of surprise by for example loitering well over friendly territory then taking advantage of height to use the extended slant range their altitude offers. They can patrol a nation-sized kill box from well out of airspace rights. Peace requires deterrence requires credible combat overmatch and none of those requirements are negotiable because they are imposed by war itself. National choices are deterrence, combat or surrender with or without destruction as in the rest of the nature of which humanity is a part and never "outside" any more than the technicalities of hive construction are other than of the bee. Strategic Rocket Bombers do not ensure total impunity but certainly would have it against MOST established conventional and less-conventional systems. For peacekeeping UN operations it could swiftly deploy to very simple pads and even use drones with cone penetrometers to determine landing zone stability then deliver food and medical aid in enough early quantity to stave off worse disaster while evac'ing appropriate medical cases to advanced life support within the "golden hour" or close to it. Even the remotest regions could be overflown and supplied by airdropped canisters proven in use since WWII and cheap enough to be expendable (hull shape/components might be repurposed as shelter or components thereof. Rapid biohazard mitigation is now urgently necessary to contain disease outbreaks (Ebola comes to mind more than COVID but diseases are many and varied) by deploying med teams, supplies then swiftly making replenishment runs especially as remoter relief airheads are expanded.
alastor the radio demon
alastor the radio demon 20 годин тому
i cnat wait to get on this rocket to go to mars it was my dream ever since i was a kid
Nightmare King
Nightmare King День тому
Congratulations space x
Qari Ghulam Shabir mahar
Qari Ghulam Shabir mahar День тому
Firopense ✔️
Firopense ✔️ День тому
I can't stop coming back
Hasitha Dilshan
Hasitha Dilshan День тому
Can I join your team
Hasitha Dilshan
Hasitha Dilshan День тому
Sir it,s possible
guignard yves
guignard yves 2 дні тому
si les gens ont une plus grandes connaissance de l'univers et notre place dans celui -ci , ils vont comprendre l'importance de votre travail , et je peut répondre a ces questions . j'ai trouvé la clef , qui sommes nous d'où l'ont viens dans cette univers , l'importance de l'expansion des trous noirs
Jari Kooper
Jari Kooper 2 дні тому
This brings back feelings from hearing the words “the falcons have landed”
guignard yves
guignard yves 2 дні тому
Je parle seulement Français très peut l'anglais , si cela peut-être utile je sais a quoi sert les trous noirs et expansion de l'univers je peut l'expliquer et par la fois convaincre les population du bien fondée d'explorer l'univers . AIDÉ MOI VOUS NE SERAIS PAS DÉÇU j'ai trouvé la clef de cette connaissance . l'univers nous a permis d'existé avec une conscience et j'ai la clef
Gift of Life
Gift of Life 2 дні тому
Starship Landing All planes on earth land horizontally on TRIPODS, regardless of length of fuselage or weight from super light piper cubs to jumbo jets to military carrier planes that transport heavy battle tanks to HARRIER jets and F35 fighter planes that do vertical take off and landing. Why do planes land HORIZONTALLY on TRIPODS? It's the safest regardless of how smooth or bumpy the landing may be. AND, consider how tall the Starship is, AND how top heavy with its payload of 100 metric tons - where is the center of gravity? A little tilt, like the lunar lander of Apollo 15 in 1971 - the Starship could topple down. WHAT GUARANTEE have you people that the landing site will be truly flat and sturdy and strong enough to support the FULL WEIGHT of Starship PLUS PAYLOAD. AND YOU'LL BE LANDING A THOUSAND STARSHIPS ON MARS VERTICALLY?!? HOW SURE ARE YOU THAT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM WON'T TILT. SOFT SOIL OR BLOWING WIND ON A SHIP WITH A LITTLE TILT COULD FALL DOWN.
Isaac Sothern
Isaac Sothern 17 годин тому
The landing legs will be self leveling so that it won't fall over, the ground will still have to be relatively flat to ensure the landing legs can adjust level the starship, in the far future starship will use landing pads similar to the one currently at Starbase. The landing legs on starships right now are single use and only temporary.
Tuuminshz День тому
*Landing legs*
Nightmare 2 дні тому
Slay Slaya
Slay Slaya 3 дні тому
Forget the engine show what you see up there.
India Wala Reaction
India Wala Reaction 3 дні тому
How will it be able to land on rough mars terrain? There are no landing pads on Mars. Or are they gonna first install landing using robots before landing?
India Wala Reaction
India Wala Reaction День тому
@TimePro If you are interested in space stuff then tell is it possible to build Jetsuit for astronauts to fly around the earth coming out of space shuttle in space and then getting back in. Do you think that can be possible?
TimePro 2 дні тому
@India Wala Reaction That’s a question only the highest of people can answer. Certainly would be nice if non-qualified people can go to Mars but I would bet they would choose to first send NASA astronaut over to Mars first.
India Wala Reaction
India Wala Reaction 2 дні тому
@TimePro I had applied for my name as person interested in travelling to Mars if they need People. Do you think they would need non qualified people us?
TimePro 3 дні тому
Starships in the future will have automatic-leveling legs that will sync with the surrounding ground.
Omar Murzabaev
Omar Murzabaev 3 дні тому
Elon if your reading this what do you think about this Idea making a rocket that can join with other rockets to make a mars orbital station or building a shipyard on mars
Omar Murzabaev
Omar Murzabaev 3 дні тому
Elon:sees Mars Elon:I've gotta go there
PASSA MOLEQUE 4 дні тому
Encilidus Saturn
Encilidus Saturn 4 дні тому
When is the 1 orbital flight test
Isaac Sothern
Isaac Sothern 17 годин тому
You mean SN20? Probably August or September, they still need to finish the launch pad and tower, GSE tanks, raptor engines and, well, the rocket
Jack Whitlock
Jack Whitlock 4 дні тому
July or August
Homeward Bound
Homeward Bound 5 днів тому
Yet our government just gave Bezos how much for his crappy space program?
Tuuminshz 4 дні тому
I scratch your back you scratch mine That's how the game works if you don't play it your loss
TimePro 5 днів тому
Wait... what? Please tell me you are joking. Blue Origin is already a joke
DomRBX 6 днів тому Just a SR2 simulation on that
tom Ickes
tom Ickes 6 днів тому
Plan B
Estanarede.Oficial 6 днів тому
Uma obra de arte.
Justus Perry
Justus Perry 7 днів тому
I have a question about your Starlink setup. I was trying to find a contact link on the website, but could not. I was curious as if two addresses I use are within the same 'cell' area. If so, I'm good to hook and will get in on this. Thanks.
lee castle
lee castle 7 днів тому
one day i will be living on marz
Cad29 6 днів тому
If you get a good job that makes alot of money tickets are supposed to be half a milion at start and then after years they can lower to 100000
BenBenOy 7 днів тому
Why does it reminds me of a squids head
TayoEXE 7 днів тому
When your rocket ship school science project finally lands in one piece.
Chris Lemfors
Chris Lemfors 7 днів тому
Can't type on the cp,?I'll work it out MORE greaf YAY, I can not find U reaplys hopping there good thanks, and I will answer everyone's e-mails Backt up something bad,baby way Joly good show everyone.👍😁🚀🌌🇭🇲+💪🌬️🌊🌀✨🌏🙈😁🤭👍8-)8-)8-)8-)
Arizona Jewell
Arizona Jewell 8 днів тому
The fact that we went from the Falcon 1 to this is just astounding. Less than 2 decades and SpaceX has went from a tiny little startup to a giant in the aerospace industry, paving the way for reusable rockets, and restoring US capability to launch humans to the ISS. Looking back at the failed Falcon 1 launches in the mid 2000s, no one would’ve guessed that this would be where SpaceX would be in 15 years. Super excited to see orbital starship tests!
Robert Wlaker
Robert Wlaker 8 днів тому
Back in 1990s i thought humans would of reached mars by year 2000 ! Just a bit out 😆
Robert Wlaker
Robert Wlaker 8 днів тому
When do you do you think humans will reach mars ? 2030s ?
Eddy Deathwishe
Eddy Deathwishe 4 дні тому
Cad29 6 днів тому
Id say about 365 x 5 days
En3rgY 8 днів тому
give em 5 years
Kofi 8 днів тому
Maybe even this decade
Chris Lemfors
Chris Lemfors 9 днів тому
I'm so glad I'm not missing anything,😁🤪🌹👽🌞🌺🌹🚀🌌👍
iLoveMath 9 днів тому
Is your math exam tomorrow ?
Steve Vladimir
Steve Vladimir 9 днів тому
CLARIFICATION: I did not mean a trampoline... I meant a solid thick plate that gives way when in contact with descending rocket... so it allows a "soft" touchdown... Hope that clarifies it.
divat 10
divat 10 9 днів тому
we in fact did not see your first comment
son of sun
son of sun 9 днів тому
hello, why earth levitate in-universe?
Ysonoko 9 днів тому
Steve Vladimir
Steve Vladimir 9 днів тому
just had a BRAINFART..... How about using a "springy" flexible landing platform instead of SOLID GROUND, no need to "catch" the THING either . you could use the STUMPY legs without the added cost/weight of extra gear on the landing legs???? Any thoughts?
Steve Vladimir
Steve Vladimir 7 днів тому
@TimePro Hope they work out a "Safe" solution. I'm speculating it's going to take much longer to produce a "Safe" system that will not risk the lives of the Astronauts/passengers the way they are going at it. Using the type of landing platform I proposed will reduce the risk, and simplify the system, be more practical, and speed up re-usability. The Starship "Shell" is just not sturdy enough to repeatedly land without constant worry of structural fatigue. Put it simply it's stupid, that's why they are resorting to splashing down SN20 and the booster.... That will not go away until they either reinforce the shell or make the Starship stumpier ( preferably wider, 20m diameter does not sound too crazy ( would be a good solution for spinning it around the center and creating artificial gravity when in Zero-G). Stumpier Starship has a few advantages...not as sexy though!
TimePro 7 днів тому
Orrrrrrr you can do it the way the SpaceX Engineers want to do it?
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 8 днів тому
@Steve Vladimir starship will land on lots of places, not all of them being landing pads
Steve Vladimir
Steve Vladimir 8 днів тому
@Pol “Politon” Valls I'm sure Elon would be able to make it's nothing compared to to the rest of the system! he can offer me a job to design it if too busy...
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 9 днів тому
@Steve Vladimir this could difficult a lot keeping the rocket standing and making thw workers go to starship
british fan
british fan 9 днів тому
Mate if there humans there they would be saved
Gabriel Souza
Gabriel Souza 10 днів тому
Parabéns!!!!!! Fico feliz que conseguiram pousar com sucesso!!!
Evandro Santana Pereira
Evandro Santana Pereira 10 днів тому
What a beast! I still find it hard to believe that a rocket of this size is capable of vertically landing with so much cargo! It looks coming strait from fiction books!
Heather Cottle
Heather Cottle 10 днів тому
11:14 he’s gonna get fired for that 😂
Caerbanog Interrupted
Caerbanog Interrupted 10 днів тому
Alright! We'll all be dead from forced vac seen before we get to mars!
Firoz Ahmed
Firoz Ahmed 10 днів тому
Yes !!!!
James Lee
James Lee 11 днів тому
They're going to send a retro 50s rocket to the moon and mars and make an entire city, with houses and resturaunts, police and government and all, from scratch, and call it Space Base. 😄 Musk and SpaceX done lost their damn minds 😄 i love it.
Isaac Sothern
Isaac Sothern 17 годин тому
Starship isn't a 1950s rocket, Starship is a 2020s rocket, so many new things with starship
TimePro 10 днів тому
What rocket from the 1950s looked like this? This isn't even the finished design. The finished design will have a full back of TPS and the front will look much better. Search it up.
Devon Prince
Devon Prince 11 днів тому
Thank u Elon musk I’m so happy it’s in my lifetime and can’t wait to here that starship has landed on Mars ✋💯🤞😉
Kim 11 днів тому
All hail the emperor of mars 😂
Motivational Speeches
Motivational Speeches 11 днів тому
Congratulations Sir Elon Musk 😊😊
Quinn STANFIELD 12 днів тому
I can’t believe it’s already been a month since this!
SFS Gamer
SFS Gamer 12 днів тому
The next generation of SpaceX vehicle is growing and developing in the speed of light
Guilherme Bicalho
Guilherme Bicalho 12 днів тому
Cosmos here we go!!!
Zbigniew Siwiec
Zbigniew Siwiec 12 днів тому
Ejzafra Tbooom
Ejzafra Tbooom 12 днів тому
After all the failure, they made it!!!!!!! Congrats to space x crews and Elon Musk you finally did it! They made a history!
FUN -TIMES 13 днів тому
Finally done👌👍👍
Sal G
Sal G 13 днів тому
Someone must make John Searl meet Elon Musk. Those two are the key. These two have the technology and the means to make it happen. If Elon Musk introduces John Searls technology, we can make this happen. I’ve analyzed John Searls technology and I really do believe he is the key.
TimePro 7 днів тому
Not saying its a bad idea, but John Searl is 89 years old. Sure he developed fuel-free power generators (But solar panels and thermoelectric generators exist too) Also read something about anti-gravity, but it did not go into detail at all. Please link me up with something that further explains the anti-gravity part. Other wise, Pretty sure Elon does not need this (rather interesting) person.
divat 10
divat 10 8 днів тому
@Sal G i mean most of the time someone claims something they are expected to have some kind of proof... since you can't share that i really can't beleave you
Sal G
Sal G 9 днів тому
@divat 10 - why would I write it down? I take in information. I do my research. Have you even bothered to research John Searl or do you depend on others to analyze for you.?
divat 10
divat 10 9 днів тому
can i see your "analisis"?
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 11 днів тому
@Sal G starship works on methane, it's not a fossil fuel, and once it become operational, they will stop Falcon 9 production and industry.
Chris Lemfors
Chris Lemfors 13 днів тому
hi 8888****
M1xer_EU 15 днів тому
I’m honestly obsessed with becoming an astronaut because of your work. Hope the 2022 Starship launch from the Deimos launch pad goes well
kim phi
kim phi 15 днів тому
The tedious head conversly request because fireman understandably depend until a unwritten jump. supreme, fretful tights
ameer hamza
ameer hamza 16 днів тому
I want to be in the first batch of people leaving earth for Mars.
Jose Carlos Aguiar Ojeda
Jose Carlos Aguiar Ojeda 16 днів тому
Starship is my favorite rocket and I have 3 draw of STARSIP
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 11 днів тому
I have made lots of them
allan churm
allan churm 16 днів тому
nice love the ship has landed ok..then with the ship still on fire... close the live ( i bet they hope it dont go bigbadaboom like last time..
Lmao. 13 днів тому
It's been a month, I'm sure you'd have heard about it by now.
TimePro 16 днів тому
Well if you listened, the fire was expected since they aren't allowed to vent out methane without being burnt. SN15 actually survived and has seen a retirement now and can be seen nearby the production site.
Linda Kristin Johansen
Linda Kristin Johansen 16 днів тому
I really feel that I could need some help right now.
xXGegi4321Xx 17 днів тому
At 12:53 if you listen closely you can hear people cheering in the background.
DemiDGamerYT 16 днів тому
I heard! LOL
Kim 17 днів тому
Space junk
Isaac Sothern
Isaac Sothern 4 дні тому
The rocket is FULLY reusable, NO space junk
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 11 днів тому
Reusable rocket
AtheoGaming07 12 днів тому
@Kim this planet is dying because of our mistake, Deal with it 0ft fan.
AtheoGaming07 12 днів тому
@Kim focus on this Topic only. This does not goes to space
Kim 12 днів тому
@AtheoGaming07 that’s exactly why we should try to learn from our mistakes and fix this planet. Not indulge musk’s phallic fantasies. The man is obsessed.
Der Blopfisch
Der Blopfisch 17 днів тому
Deutschland 2050
Deutschland 2050 17 днів тому
Musk is going to colonize the galaxy
beasticks 17 днів тому
you must include the engineers theyre legends including musk too! no hate btw
Tolunay ÇƏTİN
Tolunay ÇƏTİN 18 днів тому
Allah bir an önce Mars'a da ulaşmanızı nasip eder inşallah ❤
Tolunay ÇƏTİN
Tolunay ÇƏTİN 13 днів тому
@Exploration ok then bro. Np 👊🏼
Exploration 13 днів тому
@Tolunay ÇƏTİN sorry mate there was a guy underneath you with a copy and pasted religious comment, I do apologies as I have now deleted my comment.
Tolunay ÇƏTİN
Tolunay ÇƏTİN 13 днів тому
@Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10 ok. Only you understand everything 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10
Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10 13 днів тому
Didn't understand anything but got the word mars 👀
Tolunay ÇƏTİN
Tolunay ÇƏTİN 18 днів тому
@Exploration What?? I didn't make any comments about religion. I only mentioned God in my comment. Also, let's say I talked about religion. What's that to you? Instead of using your little brain for Islamophobia, you should use it to understand the universe, generate creative ideas and use it to benefit humanity, even as much as an ant. Hate will get you nowhere. It will take you to a place of love and virtue. Little people mess with other people. Great people deal with ideas. You'll be dead after 50 or 60 years anyway. At least leave positive energy and magnetic field to the world, brother ♡
Jake Edwards
Jake Edwards 18 днів тому
MRINAL BARMAN 18 днів тому
I ami discover karte chaschi "water plates-ing Theory, "jar sajje ej anek kaj kara sambhob habe'amake bissash karun sir ...? please..
Joy Sun
Joy Sun 18 днів тому
And with that we conclude our coverage of SN15 (just in case this one blows up too.) !
Kim 18 днів тому
Darth Flash
Darth Flash 4 дні тому
@Kim Alright, please tell me the numbers and the amount that methalox rockets produce in harmful gasses. "Everyday astronout" made a video about it also, you should go watch that.
Darth Flash
Darth Flash 4 дні тому
@Kim Rockets are actually pretty safe for the environment. Solid rocket boosters are polluting, but liquid ones are pretty safe. And spaceX only uses liquid rockets. It's industries and automotives that we have to worry about. But Tesla is handling it also. Because even the least efficient electric car is more environment friendly than the most efficient gasoline car. (Already proven) And musk is doing good by reusing rockets, thus decreasing the resources they use. I don't see the problem.
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 11 днів тому
@Kim spacex's starship team spend lots of time cleaning starship debris when it blows up, they have full responsibility of the place
Kim 12 днів тому
@Tuuminshz you are correct. We are all human scum. Scourge of the universe.
Tuuminshz 14 днів тому
@Kim you should not infect the rest of the universe
WhiteKite G
WhiteKite G 19 днів тому
Elon president for Mars anyone?😎
Pol “Politon” Valls
Pol “Politon” Valls 11 днів тому
nmb upb
nmb upb 19 днів тому
samuel berard
samuel berard 19 днів тому
This is nuts
alfred fanshaw
alfred fanshaw 19 днів тому
The Space X panto continues
MRINAL BARMAN 19 днів тому
Airplane ✈️ ke electric ba fuel ⛽ chharao Red alor dara upore tola jete pare...
MRINAL BARMAN 19 днів тому
Spaces ke sir, chummuk ar biporit dharmoke kaje lagiyeo mahakase pata jabe..
MRINAL BARMAN 19 днів тому
Sir, ami ..o2,co2, and Hydrogen ar sahajje gari chalate chai, amake jadi upni sahajjo ami chesta kare dekhiye dite pari.
Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10
Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10 13 днів тому
No one is going understand bangla here 😒
Cizee SkilzZ
Cizee SkilzZ 19 днів тому
Remind me What was the estimated time in years to go to mars 2032 ? Nah i think we will be on mars by 2026 or maybe even 2024
Exploration 18 днів тому
Unmanned in 2024 and crewed in 2026 but these timeframes could easily slip.
Cizee SkilzZ
Cizee SkilzZ 19 днів тому
YES dude i am so happy rn
《karışık》 •Videolar•
《karışık》 •Videolar• 19 днів тому
Starship 15 nice
Black Heart9
Black Heart9 19 днів тому
Ciyeee gak meledak lg.... ditunggu SN16 dst
TomTech Technologie, FPV, music Life your dream
TomTech Technologie, FPV, music Life your dream 20 днів тому
This should be effective for SpaceX
Tobias Olsen
Tobias Olsen 20 днів тому
This brings a smile to my face every time
drmax 20 днів тому
They gotta quit having these fires after landing.
Exploration 18 днів тому
That’s only happens twice and they are fixing it as we speak but for now it is not a big problem
yuh 20 днів тому
stubby plane rocket go flippy advance human baby step space exploration future
☆𝕊ℍ𝕀𝔼𝕃𝔻☆ 20 днів тому
Hello space x Mars 2022 corcoships mission update me...........
Nice-oscar 20 днів тому
To be honest, what's the point? We are not allowed to explore Antarctica or the oceans and we are trying to go up! Just ridiculous and waste of money!
Starboy 101
Starboy 101 4 дні тому
@Isaac Sothern I agree
Isaac Sothern
Isaac Sothern 4 дні тому
@Starboy 101 The US military spends almost a TRILLION dollars every year, and NASA spends maybe a few billion a year. Now 50 million dollars to launch a falcon 9 is a lot of money, and SpaceX are developing a rocket that will be able to launch 4 times the mass that falcon 9 can launch, and still hopefully being 25 times cheaper to launch. Remember the Saturn V? That cost about a BILLION dollars to launch, and SpaceX is making a rocket that can do pretty much the same as the Saturn V and yet be only 2 MILLION dollars to launch. So no, its not a complete waste of money.
Starboy 101
Starboy 101 17 днів тому
It is far from a waste of money. In the pursuit of space exploration, we have developed numerous technologies that have benefitted humans on earth in countless ways (IE: surgical robots) And using space based technology, we can accurately track the progress of human driven climate change. Besides, by colonizing other planets, we can create a backup in case earth is rendered uninhabitable via some sort of disaster, safeguarding the future of the human race. And if you’re worried about cost, remember, nasa is less that 0.5 percent of the us government’s budget, so they would be better off taking some off the military, NASA also actually makes a profit, so the whole “waste of money” thing is irrelevant.
Lensflare Deviant
Lensflare Deviant 17 днів тому
@Matheus That's nonsense.
logitech4873 17 днів тому
@Matheus I did. Can you link me to what you've been reading?
Joseph Screen
Joseph Screen 21 день тому
Making history right here! Congratulations to everyone at space X for all their hard work, it seems to have paid off. :)
นาก น้อย
นาก น้อย 21 день тому
chetan kashyap
chetan kashyap 22 дні тому
Most controlled rocket I have ever seen.🔥🔥🔥👍🏻😊🌕🌎
chetan kashyap
chetan kashyap 13 днів тому
@Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10 it's your thought 👍🏻
Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10
Everyday Starshipnaut - SN10 13 днів тому
All rockets in the world is precisely controlled.
Geetha Manumari
Geetha Manumari 22 дні тому
good job space x never give up
محمد قاسم
محمد قاسم 22 дні тому
I hate billionaires they are greedy
Lensflare Deviant
Lensflare Deviant 17 днів тому
Lots of little people hate their betters.
Exploration 18 днів тому
I hate people who think billionaires who do good are the same as the people who spent lots of money on useless things
King Smoothy
King Smoothy 20 днів тому
I hate people like you who hate billionairase
Abhay Agarwal
Abhay Agarwal 21 день тому
I hate ppl like you who put every billionaires in the sane basket .
G Anand Hemant
G Anand Hemant 22 дні тому
❤️❤️ ☮️ Going to mars is not just about all positivity Imagine taking a mankind at its worst too, all the bloodshed, pain, hate, crimes, injustice, wars, jealousy, etc to another planet. We have already messed up the earth, is mars next? Plz let the universe alone. Mars is so beautiful on its own.. it dont deserve us.. either make mars peaceful or else let humanity keep our dirty self here on this earth.. its not about making humanity a multiplanet species, its about making love a multiplanet virtue. ❤️❤️ ☮️
AtheoGaming07 13 днів тому
@G Anand Hemant earth is the next mars. Mark my words.
Stevan Matejic
Stevan Matejic 17 днів тому
@G Anand Hemant I will, gotta do a bunch of stuff rn so make sure to remind me. I should be done in a few hours
G Anand Hemant
G Anand Hemant 18 днів тому
@Stevan Matejic may be u understand, so will u tell me?
Stevan Matejic
Stevan Matejic 18 днів тому
@G Anand Hemant you seem to not understand the concept of becoming a multi-planet species do ya?
MrBreadStone 19 днів тому
bro its literally a ball of rock in the middle of a vast emptiness, nobody cares
Noé Space
Noé Space 23 дні тому
Hxxvz 23 дні тому
Congratulations SpaceX and Elon Musk
Rancillin Montgomery
Rancillin Montgomery 23 дні тому
Elon is my Hero!
SpaceX Starship timeline ft. Elon's tweets
Переглядів 886 тис.
CRS-22 Mission
Переглядів 985 тис.
Lil Nas X - MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name) ГАРЯЧА ПАРОДІЯ🔥
Чоткий Паца
Переглядів 200 тис.
GPS III Space Vehicle 05 Mission
Переглядів 573 тис.
SpaceX Starship SN20 Orbital Flight Analyzed - Flight Plan released!
What about it!?
Переглядів 398 тис.
SpaceX's Starship Prototype Takes To The Skies And Returns Safely
Scott Manley
Переглядів 745 тис.
HOW IT WORKS: The International Space Station
Переглядів 61 млн
Rocket Science Explained By Elon Musk
ritm 1
Переглядів 708 тис.
SpaceX Starship SN10 vs. SN15 - What's Improved?
What about it!?
Переглядів 593 тис.
THE FIRST 10,000 DAYS ON MARS (Timelapse)
Venture City
Переглядів 3 млн
Why Doesn't SpaceX Recover the Second Stage
Animations Xplaned
Переглядів 486 тис.
SpaceX DM-2 Flight Day Highlights - May 30, 2020
NASA Video
Переглядів 5 млн
Lil Nas X - MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name) ГАРЯЧА ПАРОДІЯ🔥
Чоткий Паца
Переглядів 200 тис.
Переглядів 353 тис.