Have you played those "other games"? There are insane bots in TF

@@demiandesu Generally bots are weak dont f*ck around

@@demiandesu bots on fps is terrible

@@bingkoiE TBF bots in FPS are always intentionally terrible. I mean it's really easy to give the bots aimbot, but it's just no fun.

Chek bots in dota. 2020 World champ team was destroyed so easy.

Stockfish: wow I'm amazing. Pats itself on the back*

"It's not easy being the best"

Obama meme

@@pronoobie5780 alpha zero enters the room

@@abdelerahmanekhaldi6228 alpha zero is far weaker than stockfish and has been for a long time. Only people who know nothing about engines think it's the best.

We have a genius among us🥳

Amgosu sususususussdy impsitor

Guy's rating is 3751

cap

Ok now you’re just playing with us

wait, so we can't defeat bots? I'm a chess noob, still learning a lot and I'm trying to beat a bot level by level. So is that impossible?

@@twitzmixx8374 not all of them but the strongest ones have out of this world's skills

If computer engines were around back when chess was being developed, we humans would have never bothered picking up this game.

@@narayasuiryoku1397 yeah because you can't defeat a bot that have calculated thousands of possibilities ahead before you..... But yeah, the ones dropped down for humans so that they commit one bad moves after some moves can be defeated......

Best you can do against perfect moves is a draw if you had infinite time

Alphazero moment

Until alphazero come 😂

@@yashrajrana4332 stockfish 14 is the best at the moment

@@yashrajrana4332 Alphazero is already defeated few years ago

How to use stockfish

You see en passant, you have to do it, its a rule stockfish proves to be right.

Only Garry Chess himself can defeat Stockfish now.

I'm sad i have never experienced en passant

r/Chessanarchy

@@lucasdelhove1568 you mean anarchychess?

Being called hot is never rude

@@savageraccoon787 he probably meant bot

att: a bot

Untill Martin join the game.

Being called Martin:

So true

yep, same feeling here

Прочитал перевод - думаю интересная мысль, и написано как будто по-русски А потом ник прочитал и всё понял))

Yeah imma be honest i have no idea what the fuck happened in the midgame either.

@@JaguaroID Yeah that's a good idea youtube had

No shit sherlock

Magnus

Well...

So did u read the title or..

Literally

Can you be 3200 tho, really? I know they say shoot for the stars but..

​@@DrKlinkist Magnus Carlsen is 3200 rated I think And there are bots like AlphaZero that are so powerful that it's hard to estimate the rating, because there's nothing that can really compare to it. AlphaZero played Stockfish and won with 1/10th of the time that Stockfish had.

@@DrKlinkist in FIDE: theoretically. In practice who knows? Maybe there's rating inflation if more people will play.

@@DrKlinkist but in lichess Magnus did already reach like 3300 or something

@@Fufolium I am pretty sure Stockfish has already long surpassed AlphaZero.

Hikaru Nakamura?)))

​@@andreyyka135 indeed hikaru is a mind blowing chess grandmaster but stockfish is more rated than hikaru and magnus you can see 3700 elo so it's impossible to beat it. Even its impossible for almost all players to reach 3000 rapid rating cuz we are humans thats it

It's about calculation! And sure the computer will win in this ! But for human being it's about intelligence and creativity ​@@Islamguides.

​@@Islamguides.I think I can beat it I beat almost every chess player in my class,it played many silly moves

​@@jackblack-ir5om What..... So do you have a stronger Engine?

@@Ubaidullah_yt thank you for informing us, keep it up! Good day sir!

@@Ubaidullah_yt He was being ironic.

@@Ubaidullah_yt no shit Sherlock

@@Ubaidullah_yt HAHAHHA holy fuck

@@Ubaidullah_yt Sir, This is the wendys

...the best moves are the best moves

isnt brilliant a move the bot hasnt thought of

@@ME0WMERE best move according to the engine itself... It can turn out to be a blunder when analysed by a stronger engine

@@ME0WMERE nah that means the only winning move which will prove useful a little later

@@zenosama3172 which does? The best move or the 'brilliant' move?

I highly doubt u got a 99 accuracy and lost

@@adamfine9228 think was saying SF got 99 accuracy

@@groundedgaming hopefully

I lost to max bot with queen and 2 rook odds... yeah....

@@AmazonRainforest715 gosh, how?

Yeah anyone have any idea why stockfish did those moves?

@@clairobisset7105 Repositioning. It wanted the two pieces elsewhere and had time to give up two tempi.

I think those moves were relatively intuitive. The moves that's always hard to understand are the quiet ones like Ra7 followed by h6 and then Kh6 before finally doubling the rooks on the h file. That kind of sequence is what's unreal.

@@gm2407 ayo wtf I just learned that the plural of "tempo" is "tempi" XDD

@@robertnagy3942 We have latin to thank for a lot of suffixes.

я думаю stockfish просматривает в первую очередь ходы за пешки в первую очередь, а ходы за ферзя почти в последнюю

@@Name-zu4nj true

In my opinion at the end Qc8# is better than Qe7#

Coz f5 makes your position better, by moving pawn up... That's computer logic :)

Because queen c7 isn’t checkmate. It moved the pawn to stall for one move so the king could move to a scare to be mated.

@@gholamalikohi6675 pretty sure stockfish 14 is better actually

@@gholamalikohi6675 stockfish 14 is stronger

@@gholamalikohi6675 Stockfish is much, much better than AlphaZero. AlphaZero beat Stockfish 8. This is Stockfish 14.

@@gholamalikohi6675 The AlphaZero equivalent today is Leela Zero, which is really good, but stockfish 14 is a little better.

But the game style of alphazero is amazing. Sacrificing pieces for better pieces and movement with does pieces. But yes I know Stockfish 14 is better.

we have Hans for that 👌

😂😂

in the form of beads

Well it does thanks to hans😂

@@wolvenspud6844 oof !!! 😂

*it

@@niccolopaganini1782 shut up

@@niccolopaganini1782 “13 and 14” - it?

@@bobuxdupe no hes saying "they" should be "It"

@@bidilz technically, but I really can't find anyone who asked. Prolly even dora with her map can't find who asked

Ikr like no humans gonna make that kind of move

1:40 is a simple clearance sac

In TCEC chess ( engine world championships ) engine is declared lost if evaluation reaches +10 or -10. I expected it here too.There is no reason to play positions what even human beginner can easily win. For example 2:19 . Why play it on if even 1200 player can easily win it as black ? But of course you have to programm engine when to resign . If you dont, they play until checkmate or draw . Human grandmasters even dont need +10 to resign. Human vs human games they often resign with evaluation +4 or + 5 and almost never need +10 to realize this is lost . For example Duda resigned against Mamedyarov in Wjik aan Zee when evaluation was +5

@@stagna1959 why would you make a machine resing? its satisfaying to see how they do the chekmate. resigning is for weak humans who dont wanna waste their intelligence in more lines, as a machine it is not a problem, until it reaches a high scale

@@skallittor5478 Fr it would be exhilarating how bots checkmate their opponent bot so we could learn from it

Book moves?

@@wedsonsantos3967 I don’t study theory

@@N2O_The1000thElement aight.

I would do the same. I learn very quickly. It's pointless to attack at first if it is a needless sacrifice.

That’s literally what all the top players to never attack until you develop your pieces

Nah they just kept a closed position, which is a relatively normal way to play. What i don't understand is whatever the fuck those tactics in the midgame were. Bot stuff i suppose.

@@joda7697 you cover potential territory while defending your own pieces, it's the same concept as stratego

@@SomeKata I'm not dumb, i know _that_ concept, i just couldn't comprehend the purpose if the specific moves we saw.

timestamp?

@@valinorean4816 1:39

@@spiderjerusalem Why was the move so good? I don't have the best understanding of chess.

@@dhaumya23gango75 It wasn't *that* good, a human could have seen it. The benefit was that it blocked the queen moving south.

Isn't that the cause of b pawn loss after 12 moves?

A timeless masterpiece

When I write Thank you so much, it just seems to be a sentence. But I really mean it. Thanks a lot.

@@Xenonity What’s the song called?

@@Hitman-889 check description

I have no idea what is going on

@@alixr7304 probably the en passant

@@Piece_Of_Clay no I get that I just meant the game has so much going and it's so high level idk what's a good move or not XD

@@alixr7304 ah I see

yo what the hell why baf here lmao

The heat death of the universe would likely occur before you win.

@@magnusultor3724 I don't mind, as long as my will carries on into eternity

I laughed but it seems to be true. :D

@@Xenonity yep, this is mathematically true

Shannon’s number gives a low bound for the number of possible chess games around 10^120. There have only been ~10^18 seconds since the Big Bang, and if you imagined every possible move being played in the smallest possible time (10^-44 seconds), this means that as of now only 10^62 chess games would have been played out, meaning you would have to wait another ~10^60 seconds for all games to be played through. At this stage in the universe, we think dark energy will have driven every single proton in the universe light years apart, to where the only thing left that we recognize today would be black holes, evaporating very slowly due to Hawking radiation. You can show that even the most massive black holes today will have evaporated after ~10^80 years, meaning you would still have some black holes left at this time. However, more accurate estimates show even 10^120 is an extreme underestimate of the number of games possible, with the actual number being around 10^3700 if the 50 move rule is invoked. So, it is safe to say you would have to wait until the universe is Googol’s of times larger than it is now and having cooled to 0K with literally nothing left in it (on any type of remotely possible measurable distance scale) before you had any chance of beating the computer at chess.

no.

@@pm-every-skne I don't have a bugatti

He didn't need it so he just decided to flex

Thank you

As a 1400 rated rapid player, I still do not get it.

As a 1800 I can't figure it too

as a 2500 i can't also

As a 0 rated non chess player I have no flipping clue

as a 200 rated classic chess player, how the f* does knight move?!?!?

And gets beaten like a little bitch to alphazero

@@LVicentini how can you say so if you haven’t seen matches between Stockfish 14.1 and Alphazero, the ones alphazero won was against Stockfish 8. This stockfish is much stronger than Alphazero. Alphazero has never played against this modern Stockfish.

is wtf

when the revolution comes, brother, all the engines are gonna take bricks

Ikr it's just absorbed lol

Trauma worakls remix if you're wondering

u mean like right now

Adobe Premiere Pro

Критически это ситуацию не поменяет. Стокфиш все так же изнасилует chesscom 25 бота Хотя все равно будет интересно посмотреть

No

También que entre ellos iguales o parecidos uno puede ganar 1,2 o 3 partidas etc pero el otro también ganará 1,2 o 3 partidas; siempre estarán con parecidas cantidades de derrotas y victorias y no tendrán mayor diferencia en sus puntajes.

what do you mean?

@@vibovitold the queen low-key pined the bishop