Ten Minute History hope all is well feel better and keep up the great work

Take your time mate, get well first, we can wait.

Ten Minute History hype

LETS HAVE 'EM BOYS! YORKSHIRE!

We love you anyway. Seems like a bunch of diseases are going round the UK, this beast from the East has brought the nation lower then the black death did.

Lucas Mayes I lost it

It would take until 1964 until France had gone 116 years without a King Louis.

Robert Jarman You mean 1461, right? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_XI_of_France

best line of the series

Best bit!

probably because the english didn't win

cant make a movie out of it. need so many sequels to get to the next stage.

@@MisterSpinalzo History isn't written by the victor... its written by the guy with the loudest voice

Actually I remember there was fantasy game base on the hundred year war on the PSP where young king Henry summon a demon army to invade france

Hosea Davit sounds accurate

I'm gonna do a montage of all the deaths after the series is finished.

Yessss

Ten Minute History Hell yes!

omg I couldn't NOT laugh every time!! 🤣🤣🤣

@@HistoryMatters YAY!

6 OF JUNE 1944

@@matthiasd.fouchard2568 ALLIES ARE TURNING THE WAR

Andres Olmos my boy

More because English make it works once they try again... And it works...

@@matthiasd.fouchard2568 nmmmnmmnmmmm mmmnmmn

Christian Buffum-Robbins Lmao I know. it made me lol

The English and the French’s relationship since the 13th century.

That's me when I had two studied two years of french in my degree which it's call ''English Studies''

@@albamoreno5471 what?

It's more like English : Hello i'm invade you French : Casse toi de chez moi !

F

You have been successfully *Thud'd*

The driest desert is envious of this mans humor, and its priceless. :)

1) 1643 - 1792 and 2) 1815 - 1824 All Kings of France were named *LOUIS* (XIII - XVIII//13th - 18th)

at least all the Kings of France were French. England Kings were all foreigners. Normand= French Plantagenets = French Tudors = Welsh Stuart = Scotish Orange-Nasau= Dutch Hanover = German Windosr (the Nazi dynasty) = german this kills me when i realized that england was the first colony of France. Dieu et mon droit

Also sums up the US relations to Russia and China and NK.

@@Joker129 Yeah! Because Russia, China and NK never make threats to the U.S. ... Dumbass

@@chrisjackson1215 but yet nk is a dictator ship that won't let it people out and russia is corrupt more than usa and china is equally bad as the us so what your point no one is the good guy lmao

@@robertevbayekha6639 saying the US is equally as bad is ridiculous. If we compared it before the Civil Rights movement, maybe. But modern day china being worse than pre civil rights US is appallingly bad.

@@OnlyGrafting nah before civil rights movement usa was still not mess up

absolute chad

Well 10 minute history did end but the channel is still around

Well the good thing about history is, there's so much of it.

Your comment took 10 minutes worth of dictionary deep-dive to understand

Ray Last much of Northern Europe except Ireland😉. Catholic for life

Protestant for life !!😉

And the first French military campaign in Italy opened everyone's eyes to the artistic and scientific wonders the Italians were up to meanwhile, and 'forced' open a territory that was somewhat isolated for a while, and for the next 7 wars, became the staging ground of the conflicting ambitions between French and Germans that shaped Europe for centuries to come

@@Valencetheshireman927 atheist for life

I think the end of of medieval warfare is marked by the battle of Cerignola in 1503 between Spanish and French forces, since it was the first battle won by small firearms against knights. To put a long story short, the Spanish commander Gonzalo de Cordoba had a bunch of extra arquebuses because reinforcements had not arrived but their supplies had. So he massed the arquebuses on a fortified position, which then decimated the attacking French forces when they charged. Pikemen and swordsmen then finished off the retreating French, who managed to get themselves stuck in a muddy field while trying to get away.

Fucking ruthless though but he was only protecting his men which is honorable

Heretics are flamable =D

@@J-IFWBR oh ok that’s too far.

Your history teacher is smart.

Nice

"Heretics are flammable" :-)

@@SidheKnight a lesson many kings would learn in the near future

Most Portuguese kings called John were pretty good as well

@@masterplokoon8803 what's really ironic, is that this John II of France in question, was dubbed "Jean Le Bon", which roughly translates to John the Good xD

Can’t be very good considering how shit byzantines were

@Ed the simple answer is, they used i instead. if you ever wondered why crucifixes have INRI when they really mean Jesus Nazarenus Rex Judaeorum, that's why. the longer answer involves borrowed orthography from Old French, the fact that those names are foreign to English in the first place, and only a later-on desire to seperate the vowel-i from the consonant-j. might as well also point out that this sometimes-a-vowel-sometimes-a-consonant situation still exists in English, in the form of the letter y (compare, say, year and rhyme)

That English John was apparently a better king than he is usually given credit for. He was certainly more competent than his absentee idiot brother Richard who let himself be captured and held for ransom.

Where did the first louis come from hmmm?

Hey we have the same pfp

John 117 War 116

@@casper6405 Louis the first is Charlemagne's eldest and only surving son who succeded him as the king of the Francs and Emperor of Europe in 814. And the name Louis is so popular in french royalty because it derives from the name Clovis (C became silent and V became U)

The first Louis was Clovis, king of the Franks. He conquered the former roman Gaul at the end of the 5th century and he created the first french royal dynasty. (Louis is a deformation of Clovis). The 2d Louis was Charlemagne’s son, Roman Emperor. So the name Louis was both royal and imperial. That explains its success in the french royal families.

Αριι

Κακα

cool

She was made a saint - in 1920.

@@Jeffron71 she was made a Saint after the church split from the French government! Designed to give the French people a strong sense of nationalism and unite the people after WW1

Hugh Capet Robert II, the Pious Henry I Philip I, the Amorous Louis VI, the Fat Louis VII, the Young Philip II Augustus Louis VIII Louis IX (Saint Louis) Philip III, the Bold Philip IV, the Fair Louis X, the Quarrelsome John I Philip V, the Tall Charles IV, the Fair 987-96 996-1031 1031-60 1060-1108 1108-37 1137-80 1180-1223 1223-26 1226-70 1270-85 1285-1314 1314-16 1316 1316-1322 1322-28 Valois Dynasty Philip VI, the Fortunate John II, the Good Charles V, the Wise Charles VI, the Well-Beloved Charles VII, the Victorius Louis XI Charles VIII, the Affable Louis XII, the Father of His People Francis I Henry II Francis II Catherine de Medici (Regent) John I Charles IX Henry III 1328-50 1350-64 1364-80 1380-1422 1422-61 1461-83 1483-98 1498-1515 1515-47 1547-59 1559-60 1560-63 1560-74 1574-89 Bourbon Dynasty Henry IV, the Great Marie de Medici (Regent) Louis XIII, the Well-Beloved Anne of Austria (Regent) Louis XIV, the Great Philip of Orleans (Regent) Louis XV, the Well-Beloved Louis XVI, the Beloved Louis XVII

@@jamesronaldo2855 Lol "Louis the Fat." Wouldn't want to be caught dead with such a moniker

One of history's great What ifs.

Well he was still highly dependant on the Burgundians and having him taking over France wasn't in the Duke best interest since playing English and French against one another was his best way to maintain de facto independance and expand his territory.

Yeah but I don't see the interest of the Duke of Burgundy in becoming the lapdog of such a powerful king.

That might have actually worked. The Spanish-American War was a great unifier for the North and South.

Arguably the "English" defeat of the 100 year war turned out to be an English victory and a French defeat culturally speaking; most of the "english nobility" being french and all. Cause had the english won and lasted at more than one generation and the english language would be even more french than it currently is. Cause the "english" dinasty would have ruled form Paris and reverted back to french as the main language, culture etc. Although, I don't think it would have lasted for long anyway : the two entities would have regained independence from one another one way or another...

That's an interesting idea, actually.

Samuel Lee Let the man finish this one first. He's got a long way to go

Do you seen the serie Versailles ?

Definitely. I would also like to see something Byzantine, like the Palaiologoi

Or even better, a video about the first Frankish monarchs, the Merovingian's & how what would become the Carolingians' stole the throne.

In rl they where not experienced enough

No need, just occupy the continental holdings and then ask for the irish province thay have (Meath, i think), then after the war move some troops to ireland and start conquering, you can then cross into scotland and use it as a waypoint to getting the rest of england (you should be powerfull enough to beat the english with you army)

I'm having trouble finding the quote, but the annexation occurred in the December of 1961 as part of this giant sprawling mess aptly referred to by the Portuguese as "the overseas war" that lasted from that same year to the end of the Estado Novo regime in 1974 following salazar's death

The Portuguese should've just answered "yes" to that offer - because actually finding several seaworthy men-of-war with cannons would've been quite a task, I imagine. :D

Fake. India kicked Portugal out of Goa in the 60's. The British were strongly opposed to Portuguese colonialism by then and theough they did not support the Indians they voiced their concern for Portuguese colonialism. I don't know where you heard that or if you made it up yourself, but whoever first thought that is just an idiot looking to divide the two nations.

@@zap3231 uh, did you read the comment? All Britain offered to give them were obsolete wooden ships, or at least so goes the story I heard.

@@jonathanredacted3245 Yes I read the comment and I explained why it's complete bullshit.

I Took Apu ERE true RE

1453 Worst year EU.

Long live Byzantium

Rip Constantinople and the Byzantines :-(

Too soon

Ancient History Guy So did the French knights.

They tried, at least they attempted to learn from past battles. Just mud and heavy armour don't mix that well apparently :D

I'd think charging directly at wooden stakes didn't do them much either.

haha nope! I think the French got a bit carried away with the whole "we have bigger army lets steamroll them thing" never mind the fact that the English have sharp pointy things in the way :D

Didn't Sun Tzu say that it is never wise to get in the way of an army going home?

those should be calles the first disembark, the second... the third.... etc....

Well the Germans did try and build an Atlantic Wall. That didn't end up working out too well. Also (and this is one of the reasons England has been less and less successfully invaded than France), currents in the English Channel make it easier to sail from England to Normandy or Brittany than the opposite. In fact, William the Conqueror had to wait months until the winds were good enough to attempt the crossing - which turned out to be salutary, as Harold Godwinson had had to confront the Norwegians in the north and his army was tired. The difficulty to navigate the western Atlantic coast of Europe partially explains why France, despite having such a long coastline, was late in building a true navy, aside from having enough arable land of excellent quality not to need fishing or maritime trade. That is, until the 16th century, when appropriate naval technology could be implemented and used for trans-Atlantic travel.

Both times

Y a une odeur de Duguesclin là !!!!

The lands aren’t all French much of it was inherited land from the Angevin empire which the French stole .

It was a partly defensive war and partly aggressive war , dumbass

@@---675 "your own land back" English royalty LOST its inherited lands in France. It's literally a loss of territory. "internationally" Lmao. French would remain the language of the elite throughout Europe for the better part of 4 centuries.

@@Valencetheshireman927 Lol "english land" do I need to remind you that your king was originally a french duke who just felt like conquering England ? So technically all english land is french land

I find remarkable that the Kings of England at that time were all French. Dieu et mon droit Honi soit qui mal y pense

They weren’t all French . Besides two of your French kings were English

@@Valencetheshireman927 All Kings of France were French, basic principle of French history. English at that time could not be king of France because: 1) they were French, not English. 2) They were not members of the Capetian Dynasty. While All Kings of England were foreigners. But you are not the only country created by French. The first king of Portugal for example, was French, a Capetian from Bourgogne. so you should be happy to be part of the French former colonies. The Normands = French The Plantagenets = French The Tudors = Welsh, The Stuarts = Scottish, The Orange-Nasau = Dutch, The Hanover = German, The Nazi Windsor (Edward VIII, Elizabeth II) = German "Dieu et mon Droit / Honi soit qui mal y pennse" are not English mottos. :-)

@Ludovicius Magnus - “All kings of France were French , basic principle of French history .” What about King Henry the V who ruled most of France and although wasn’t crowned he still controlled the country for a while . He was born in Monmouth , Wales so are you telling me that he was French even though he was born in Wales and was the King of England ? What about his son ,king Henry the 6th who WAS crowned the king of France , he was born in Windsor castle which is in England are you still going to tell me that both those men were French and that all monarchs of France were French ? Someone needs to improve their geography skills 😉! English at that time could be considered kings of France because : 1- Exactly because of their French lineage . How does being French mean you can’t claim the French throne . Your logic of the English kings being French kinda contradicts itself there . 2- King Edward the third ( Who started the war his mother was of the Capetian dynasty which is why he claimed the throne of France in the first place . He had a bigger claim to the throne of France than House Valois did ! Not all kings of England were foreigners most of them were actually born in England even if their ancestors came from another country . 3- The fact that you think I should be happy at that prospect frankly disgust me . England was never w colony of France but the very thought of it is horrifying! The Normans - Norman French The Plantagenets - Yes but of French DESCENT not all of them were born in France. The Tudors - Welsh The Stuarts-Scottish Orange - It was hardly a dynasty since the only Dutch king of England was William of Orange who fight jointly with his English wife , Mary . The Windsors - The were first called the house of Hannover , then Saxe-Coburg Gotha and then finally Windsor . They were German but it’s foolish if you to think that they are Nazis when that’s not even a good conspiracy theory . There are rumours that Edward was pro-Nazi but even if that were true that doesn’t make the entire dynasty a house of Nazis as you seem to imply in other comments .

Except english is a Germanic language like german dutch swedish danish Norwegian and Icelandic. French is a Latin language like Spanish Portuguese Italian Sicilian and Romanian. England is more like a Scandinavian settlement. Seeing as the norman french were Scandinavians who spoke a dialect of french

@@thomashaapalainen4108 Yhea but it was inspired by old french (doc and doil languages)/vulgar latin. I've researched and english is composed of 30% of old french, 30% vulgar latin (also imported from France) or so and 40% saxon I believe. The normans were of french culture and bowed as vassals to the king of France. They were nords who were "assimilated" into french culture (assimilation is an important word in France's History, even to this day in politics). The germanic aspect of the english language is connected to everyday life and common things of the people, meaning as long as the vocabulary is ordinary or simple objects, you'd talk english perfectly fine just knowing german. But, as latin and french were the language of the nobles and the monarchy and the King, it'd be a lot less riched language. The British Monarchy also retains that aspect today of the french monarchy: « Dieu et mon droit » "honni soit qui mal y pense" The hundred years war was a war between 2 french dynasties. And a civil war of course.

Nope it was mongol composite bow 🏹

Tom Granger Why would they call their heir to the throne a dolphin?

Merritt Animation erm I think it's something to do with the coat of arms of the region he took over having a dolphin on it. Not sure, will have to do some googling. It's similar to the heir to the English throne being the Prince of Wales

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dauphin_of_France

I dunno, but the english call the heir to the throne Prince of Whales.

+TheCsel You win an Internet today sir.

So technically They should be Called The House of Yorkist-Plantagenant and the House of Lancastrian-Plantagenant

Massive amounts of luck and seized the opportunity.

MakaveliThaSavage Geography, ingenuity, skill and luck. Mainly geography though

Geography and luck is oversimplifying it a bit - eg the West frequently utilized pre-existing conflicts to gain a foothold, such as the Spanish who arrived in Peru to a civil war. War was costly on the Inca and once a victor was announced the Spanish held him ransom... then killed him when the ransom was paid, because of course they did 😂

We can make the same with France, Spain and more...

"Geography and luck" they played two of the smallest parts. The British Empire was just incredibly good at what they did and thats that.

"VII

Much of the inspiration was already covered in this channel. What with the multiple kingdoms and such.

*Wars of the Roses 🌹

Yes you re true. All is written in court documents. Joan Arc execution wasn t a pope decision but a corrupted Bishop decision under english influence at Rouen.

what is blawg doing in normandy

Then the French got cannons

you should study the battle of Patay then, or battle of la Brossiniere...

Totally historically innacurate and full of anti-french propaganda. The battle of Azincourt is far away from reality, the evil Dauphin of France was in reality a sick and discreet man who wasn't even present in the battle because he was already... dead. While Henri V was far away from being a gentleman, a warrior execute prisonners and doing massacre. The movie was inspire by a Shakespear play, not reality.

This movie is propaganda. :0)

With DLC fall of Constantinople same year as the end of hundred year war

Wasn't that the reason he was called "The Good"?

I think it’s because he was handsome since his name was Jean le Bel and that’s the masculine form of beautiful

it says a lot more about you than on the video):

The third one is King John Balliol of Scotland. He abandoned Scotland soon after Edward I invaded and was forced to abdicate.

Ah, thanks!

The particularity of Azincourt is England broke the medieval war aggreement Killing nobles prisoners instead of ransomize. This shame has a prize . The english King lost all his allies in Western France ( Poitou, Normandy, Anjou, Britany). Sometimes a short time decision can give have a short time benefit but can be very bad in long time.

@@GigachadicusMaximus today. But not in the médiéval area