you have diabetes. check it out before it gets worse

that's why it is most powerful.

Slowest impacts per minute maybe. Not much else that is going to remove rocks that fast. And before you say explosives, you have to spend a lot of time drilling for explosives.

Not talking aboutblowing it up! I operate a hammer on an excavator that would run rings around that .

@@brocky7470 That's funny, because I've seen excavators spend hours doing nothing but making chips before they ended up blasting. Really it comes down to the material being removed.

@Ganiscol just another youtube know it all, getting off on feeling superior amongst people he doesn't, or never will know. ignore

Don’t tell me what to do, you’re not even my real dad

They’re fine

@@joedwc exactly. I swear, any video involving construction in any way, you get people in the comments acting like know-it-alls. Sometimes it’s good info, but it seems like more and more often now it’s just people taking issue with nothing.

It’s in India, what do you expect...

normal hammers aren't meant to penetrate several feet or even meters. they're meant to break smaller rocks or concrete, and be more productive which is why they're faster. and more compact. you couldln't use that in construction. maybe commercial, where you just have a giant open area. everything has it's place.

and as far as ears go, my ear buds work just fine for me. maybe not so much for the other people on site.lol

Just a side note. Line the pan with parchment paper. It works because I don't have to do the cleaning of the pan. 😏

Any shit operator could hold this and go bang..............bang...............bang.

that's because it would use a lot more fuel if it went faster

@@rogerwoodland2587 fuel doesn't run hydraulic system ??

@@rickybobby1888 then what does then lol lol.

The punch is on a pulley system I think like a pile ram that’s why it ain’t going at it like a standard point breaker

roger woodland hydraulics which are power off of a PTO off the engine.

any over way would take much longer that's why this metherd is quicker.

You are right about that rock it is only shell rock very soft not like solid blue stone

but still better than anything else

but still the best tool for the job so it s a winner.

a weight impacter uses less fuel and is more reliable

a hydraulic impactor is more suited for smaller rocks. a weight impactor is better for big rocks

a weight impactor is faster for big rocks. and hydraulic impactor is best for smaller rocks

a hydraulic impactor is too slow weight impactor is faster.

This video drives me crazy because it never shows the full hammer in the shot a single time. Ridiculous

Well your shit then,playing with toys

You clearly have no idea what you're dribbling about

@@simonchant761 38 years I don't know nothing

Any breaker over 3,000lbs will break and remove living granite on any excavator. Anything over 6,000lbs allows you to chisel living granite from any position in any direction and just destroys it like butter. Same with basalt. Cheers!

Thats what I'm thinking. Its a hammer not a pry bar and rubble mover

Impact.

In around 2 - 3% of rock which is mined, blasting is not allowed or presents other problems which make alternatives like hammers more economical. In this application, blasting is not allowed due to ground vibration problems. When you can't blast, you need the next-most cost effective method. That method is to use the Terminator.

APR thanks for the info. Be safe and keep on keeping on!

it would use more fuel not a good idea

it would use more fuel not good idea

it would use more fuel not a good idea.

and they need to improve cars so they can go around the world on a teaspoon of petrol.

Do you live in a building? Materials have to come from somewhere you ignorant fool.

It depends. In some bulk applications blasting is better, and in others the Terminator can operate more economically or in conditions where blasting is difficult or impossible. Here blasting is forbidden and in this application the Terminator has the same cost and productivity as blasting anyway. Where the Terminator wins: Armour stone, foundations, oversize, anywhere there are restrictions on blasting or difficulties getting explosives, trenching, demolition of thick or heavily reinforced concrete, breaking steel slag, skulls and cast iron, quarrying and mining in many places where the rock is layered or fractured, precision mining where the ore can be distinguished from the deposit (phosphate, manganese etc), precision quarrying where there is contamination of the deposit with clay etc, most civil construction within cities or near roads, road building in rock, etc.

but take longer.

not always practical.

J H .....he does but refuses to use it anywhere it could put a man or woman out of a job.... except for busting heads... sounds silly but its his hammer

it is.

Had one of them up here too and it ended up in the scrap pile. Too slow, too expensive to fix.

Hauling in NZ . ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kmJjhJCpfW-jmJc.html .2020 haulage. 57 tons. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qJWHiaClbqWDl2g.html.. highway haulage..50T ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qYFno4aoq5iD0n0.html . NZ-Timber trucks 150T ukposts.info/have/v-deo/g3d7iK1nbq-Dp5s.html .. 57T chip hauler . ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kXmJo5CxnXh7rGQ.html ..200 ton off highway loggers , ukposts.info/have/v-deo/n11zoq2weYFmqZ8.html .Classic trucking.39T = 8V92T

@@AA4AA4 orange man on crack Trump 2024

@@mtl-ss1538 Thanks for the NZ insight good looking Rigs, You have road-train's in NZ also.!!!

polat alemdar ....لكن النتيجة فعالة ومثيرة للاعجاب

Russell Freer lets gp back to using dynamite. its more fun

Russell Freer ....the result is faster !

to go faster would use more fuel

because its big and heavy

@@jeffcarroll1990shock It would take more time to drill the holes to put the dynamite into than just use this machine. .

One foot (1').

sounds like you have never used a road drill they would take all day.