The British-American War of 1812 - Explained in 13 Minutes

  Переглядів 2,185,507

Knowledgia

Knowledgia

3 роки тому

Watch thousands of documentaries on CuriosityStream: curiositystream.thld.co/knowl...
Use my code: "knowledgia" to get 25% off your yearly subscription.
The British-American War of 1812 - Explained in 13 Minutes
♦Consider supporting the Channel of Patreon and gain cool stuff:
/ knowledgia
♦Please consider to SUBSCRIBE: goo.gl/YJNqek
♦Music Used :
Kevin MacLeod - Interloper
Kevin MacLeod - FaceOff
Restless Natives - Doug Maxwell
♦Script & Research :
Skylar Gordon
#History #Documentary

КОМЕНТАРІ: 11 000
@Knowledgia
@Knowledgia 3 роки тому
Thank you so much for watching, guys! You can help our channel by watching thousands of documentaries on CuriosityStream Register with this link: curiositystream.thld.co/knowledgianov And use my code: "knowledgia" to get 25% off your yearly subscription.
@MastemaJack
@MastemaJack 3 роки тому
It was just called The War of 1812 not the british-american war of 1812
@MastemaJack
@MastemaJack 3 роки тому
@DIEGO PEREZ GENIS The british barely did anything. It was canadians.
@MastemaJack
@MastemaJack 3 роки тому
@DIEGO PEREZ GENIS Lol another person who had low reading comprehension
@wonjubhoy
@wonjubhoy 3 роки тому
@@MastemaJack largely true. Britain's priority then was fighting Napoleon.
@MastemaJack
@MastemaJack 3 роки тому
It was mostly just officers who were from Britain. Most of the actual fighting was done by people who were born there in Canada.
@tricksor6589
@tricksor6589 3 роки тому
UK: *burns Washington DC* US: "Alright, we'll call it a draw"
@fryreviews693
@fryreviews693 3 роки тому
I mean, we got a badass anthem so it was a draw
@DidacusAugustus
@DidacusAugustus 3 роки тому
@@fryreviews693 nah... You still lost
@fryreviews693
@fryreviews693 3 роки тому
@@DidacusAugustus, We didn’t lose, we just failed to win
@jtgd
@jtgd 3 роки тому
@@fryreviews693 alright McClellan. You’re out!
@goyonman9655
@goyonman9655 3 роки тому
'tis but a flesh wound
@imlivingunderyourbed7845
@imlivingunderyourbed7845 3 роки тому
Kind of a plot twist that the British were actually holding back the whole time because Napoleon was keeping them busy back in Europe.
@Butter_Warrior99
@Butter_Warrior99 3 роки тому
I mean, would you rather fight your old colony that's across a literal ocean. Or a literal Dictator that steamrolled most of Central Europe. Still the war itself provides very interesting thought experience; like alternate histories and such.
@mildew1
@mildew1 3 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 hahaha...USA got the terms? They lost this war...hahaha...keep on lying to yourself.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@@mildew1 yep, end of impressment, end of orders in council and the end of British support for the natives doesn’t sound like a loss to to me keep being butt hurt. Facts are facts.
@mildew1
@mildew1 3 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 hmm...America tried to conquer Canada and failed. Britain achieved its objectives by keeping the territory. USA got some butt kicked. Britain kept control of the seas. Keep on dreaming of American success that wasn't. Butt hurt? I am proud that Canada won. USA should be ashamed of itself for committing an aggression and losing.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@@mildew1 incorrect, the USA goal was to never annex Canada that in fact was a war myth. Btw the USA won the majority of battles even winning the last two battles fought in Canada at Cooks mills and Malcolms Mills 🤷‍♂️Nor was the USA’s goal to “take control” on the seas lol. You’re pretty butt hurt because 2nd there was no Canada. 😂 committing aggression? So impressment, supporting natives isn’t aggressive?
@blakesutherland519
@blakesutherland519 Рік тому
Fun fact. Had Napoleon not sold Louisiana to the United States in 1803, Britain would've ended up with it after the Napoleonic Wars and modern day Canada would've stretched to the gulf of Mexico.
@ChrisJohannsen
@ChrisJohannsen Рік тому
The good timeline
@leroysanchino
@leroysanchino Рік тому
@@ChrisJohannsen why would anyone want more Britain in the world?
@thanhhoangnguyen4754
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 Рік тому
@@leroysanchino Not if they want USA more any how. Any the case i am on the British side on these. Rather than yielding those land for the USA i rather have those land yied to Tecumseh Confederate like the British intended a buffer states between British Canada and USA.
@thanhhoangnguyen4754
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 Рік тому
@@leroysanchino People argue that British Canada or USA win or lose. Only the truly loser was Tecumseh Confederate. Even after the worst due to the hand of Jackson act those people and what remains of them have more suffer trial to came.
@MrSymbolic7
@MrSymbolic7 Рік тому
Here's another fun fact , the only building in Washington D.C. not burned to the ground in the War of 1812 was the Masonic Temple it was not touched !
@rngrzulu1275
@rngrzulu1275 Рік тому
Some of the most significant battles were excluded, notably the famous Battle of New Orleans. This took place after the signing of the Treaty of Ghent and launched Andrew Jackson towards national fame eventually leading to his presidency. The battle was the end of the Gulf Campaign, American forces were outnumbered by around 8,000 to 5,800. Yet the result was a staggering 2,000 British casualties vs 71 Americans. Also, an enduring motto of the US Navy “Don’t Give Up The Ship” came from the last orders of Captain Lawrence aboard the Chesapeake. His words were memorialized on Commodore Perry’s flag as a rallying cry hoist above his flagship Lawrence and later Niagara during the battle of Lake Erie.
@adsyuk1991
@adsyuk1991 Рік тому
Its likely because, death count apart, it wasn't a significant battle in terms of notable increase/decrease in chance of victory. In the grand theatre it meant very little. Still, its an incredible story. Its similar in some ways to the Battle of Rorke's Drift.
@oleggorky906
@oleggorky906 Рік тому
Yes, 5,800 hiding in a swamp, ready for an ambush against an unsuspecting enemy. No big surprise in the high casualties with that in mind because anyone can shoot down an enemy who can’t shoot back. And even then you only won a peripheral battle which didn’t even matter seeing as a peace treaty had just been signed but the news hadn’t gotten to where it was supposed to be. Okay, a great psychological boost to catch the enemy napping but it changed nothing, or at least not for the British. But on the other hand your new army got beaten up badly by an army made up largely of Canadian farmers and other partisans. Pretty embarrassing for you really. The British kept control of Canada. All you gained out of the war was the chance to take it out on the Indians again, namely Tecumseh’s lot and the other Creeks. Heck, you almost nearly lost some of your people in New England who were that pissed off that they were thinking of breaking away. You pissed off all those businesses in New York who had been doing good trade with the British ever since the revolutionary war ended and you were very lucky not to have faced another army coming over from Europe. You know what stopped that? Wellington, fresh from victory at Waterloo was asked if he would lead an invasion. But common sense prevailed. He reckoned the expenditure wouldn’t be worth what it would achieve because wars cost lots of money ... and just like us, you had to tighten your belts because you were short of money. Or as we would say here, we were both as skint as @rseholes.
@airlinesecret6725
@airlinesecret6725 Рік тому
Americans always quote Battle of New Orleans , conveniently forgetting the last major battle of the war, Battle of Fort Bowyer.
@ryanc970
@ryanc970 8 місяців тому
In 1814 we took a little trip
@kidfox3971
@kidfox3971 8 місяців тому
​@@ryanc970Who's the only superpower, not the Br*****.
@mm-ir1ii
@mm-ir1ii 3 роки тому
British :- its just a minor theatre of the Napoleonic wars Americans :- nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo it a war in its own right !!!!!
@phillip_iv_planetking6354
@phillip_iv_planetking6354 3 роки тому
Then why not come and take it when the Napoleonic war was over? Because you couldn't.
@valeriejames4675
@valeriejames4675 3 роки тому
Because once Napoleon was beaten the British were going to send a large AF army. Then the Americans noped right out of it.
@Hunter-ww9rd
@Hunter-ww9rd 3 роки тому
@@phillip_iv_planetking6354 the British at the time decided to maintain the status quo in order to not incite tension in the US. The reason being is that Britain rather watched on as mainland Europe fought each other allowing the UK to grow further in the colonies. It would be of no use to the British to take American land as in peace time trade with the US was necessary
@phillip_iv_planetking6354
@phillip_iv_planetking6354 3 роки тому
@@Hunter-ww9rd Because they had no choice. They were taking our sailors. We forced them to stop/ They hindered our trade we forced them to respect it. Im mean how could this pass you over? You make it seem like we were the instigators. Just how fucking dumb are you?
@phillip_iv_planetking6354
@phillip_iv_planetking6354 3 роки тому
@@valeriejames4675 Yet we fought on till Feb. 1815 the war being over since Dec. 1814 and we defeated the British at New Orleans. Yeah we ran......
@canag0d
@canag0d 3 роки тому
It’s crazy. I live in Niagara Falls and a lot of these battles took place right near me. I live 30 seconds away from Lundy’s Lane. My public school growing up was called “battlefield”. It was the site of the battle of Lundy’s Lane. You could actually find musket balls in the field sometimes. And right next to our field was a cemetery where Laura Secord is buried. Cool stuff.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
I’m from the American side.
@juansantana8448
@juansantana8448 2 роки тому
"We fired one shot and the brits begun a running on down the Mississippi. to the Gold of Mexico..."
@bkapitan
@bkapitan 2 роки тому
i live here too
@jaif7327
@jaif7327 Рік тому
@@juansantana8448 k juan
@leroysanchino
@leroysanchino Рік тому
@@juansantana8448 in 1814 we took a little trip
@kieranclarges2514
@kieranclarges2514 9 місяців тому
Is it just me, or is it every time America loses a war they call it a draw. I.e. this war, Korean war, Vietnam war, war with the Taliban.
@Me-fm9zk
@Me-fm9zk 9 місяців тому
If the foreign country was occupied and invaded, that will be a US win. If US was invaded and occupied by a foreign country, it will be a US loss. If neither country was invaded and occupied by another, it is a draw. Which country was invaded and became under another country’s power after the war? US landing in Korea and pulling out is similar to England trying to invade US but pulling out later in 1812. Draw!
@kieranclarges2514
@kieranclarges2514 9 місяців тому
@@Me-fm9zk Interesting way of looking at it.... A wrong way, but interesting none the less. To win a war a country must achieve the objective of going to war. To Draw BOTH countries must fail at their objectives and call an end to the war. - The American Objective of the Korean war was to get rid of North Korea and reunite korea as one country. America FAILED to do this hence LOST the war. The North Korean objective was to retain control of the north which they did, Hence they WON - The war of 1812 the British entered the war to PROTECT their colonies in the north and stop America invading the north, Which they did. Hence The British WON. It could be argued that Americas objective was to end the trade embargo, However that would likely have ended after the defeat of Napoleon and without costing 15000 American lives and 3 years of war. Also the fact the British benefited for the lowering of the trade embargo. So very arguably the british won that war too. As Americas apt Representative Trump proved with the retreat in Afghanistan , You can't give your enemy everything they have ever wanted a still claim victory. As a response to your strange belief that wars require invasion. I look forward to the conclusion of Americas war on DRUGS and war on TERROR where they will apparently invade and conquer TERROR and DRUGS.... Somehow.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 9 місяців тому
@@kieranclarges2514but yet how is this? North Korea invaded the south first to take it over the UN forces including Britain stopped this. You’re logic makes no sense. North Korea invaded South Korea in June 25, 1950. Please study. The UN goal was to defend South Korea. Well the trade embargo didn’t end after the napoleon happened during the war which was a US goal achieved. But yet how that? Britain tried to take US land and Indian buffer state and Maine the buffer state was to block westward expansion which failed and easily won by the US. And impressment ended. Also won by the US as for the economy in the US it grew every year. Another win for the US. I mean at 12 minutes it literally explains what the USA achieved. As for Afghanistan the goal was never to defeat the Taliban. The US went into Afghanistan to kill or capture Bin Ladden goal was achieved in 2011 Why by 2014 the combat mission ended and turned into a training mission and then the pull out the ANA was supposed to take care of themselves then fell apart once NATO withdrew. Please study before commenting as to not embarrass yourself further.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 9 місяців тому
@@kieranclarges2514☝️
@UserName-om6ft
@UserName-om6ft 8 місяців тому
except the US has never lost a single war in history, the US achieved its war goals in the war of 1812 both 1776 and 1812 were resounding British humiliations, Korean war was a victory North Korea failed to invade South Korea the US successfully defended South Korea and the US achieved its main war goals of resolution 82 and 83, Vietnam was a decisive victory for the US 1.4 million NVA/VC KIA vs only 58,000 US KIA the US defeated the Vietnamese in almost every single engagement thats about as clear as a victory can get, and the US never lost a single battle with the Taliban unlike the British losing to a bunch of American corn farmers with pitch forks in both 1776 and 1812, the British lost the Korean war, the British lost the war with the Taliban in fact the British lost not one, not even two but THREE separate wars in Afghanistan, the British lost the Anglo-Afghan war in 1842, the British lost the Anglo-Afghan war in 1919, and the British lost the 2001 war in Afghanistan, the British lost to rice farmers in the Indonesian war of independence in 1949, the British lost to desert farmers with flip flops during the Aden war in 1967 etc... the US has never lost a single war in history 247 years of history and still maintains an undefeated war record
@Baboonmomma
@Baboonmomma 2 роки тому
USA's Mission: take Canada UK's Mission: Keep Canada *USA DOESNT TAKE CANADA* *UK KEEPS CANADA* USA: well i guess we won
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
Not what happened the US goal wasn’t to annex Canada at all 😂😂
@anothergermanmapper7754
@anothergermanmapper7754 2 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 That literally was one of the Main Goals of the War.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
@@anothergermanmapper7754 actually it wasn’t that’s a myth. In fact here is historian Donald Hickey on the subject ukposts.info/have/v-deo/f6J0rpmAZ5V7wo0.html
@greenbasterd9112
@greenbasterd9112 2 роки тому
Yeah they cant admit defeat at all lol
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
@@greenbasterd9112 yeah Canadians can’t
@teviottilehurst
@teviottilehurst 3 роки тому
Most of us in the UK have never heard of this war. We've had so many foreign wars that this war is just a footnote, if that.
@shrimpflea
@shrimpflea 3 роки тому
Most Americans know little to nothing of this war.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@Artour Babiev begged for what treaty? Not in this war. Please show me where this happened 😂
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@Artour Babiev really? Because Wikipedia agrees with this video...
@educateyou3679
@educateyou3679 3 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 that’s very true
@stephenjenkins7971
@stephenjenkins7971 2 роки тому
@Artour Babiev This guy skipped how the Americans sacked the Canadian capital, FYI. And how deep the Americans cut into Canadian territory overall. Get over yourself lol
@BrutusAlbion
@BrutusAlbion 3 роки тому
Americans: We won! British: We won! EU players: a white peace it is ...
@aurumsultan7319
@aurumsultan7319 3 роки тому
Mhm
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@DIEGO PEREZ GENIS what territory did they gain? The USA was the only one that gained territory West Florida and Carleton island.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@DIEGO PEREZ GENIS not true, the british only held Washington DC for 25 hours and it lead to Baltimore where the British withdrew from the Chesapeake.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@DIEGO PEREZ GENIS I agree it was.
@BlindingGlow
@BlindingGlow 3 роки тому
@DIEGO PEREZ GENIS You're talking out of your a**.
@elkiwi69
@elkiwi69 2 роки тому
I would call it a win by Britain because it was the US trying to invade Canada which they did not succeed in doing.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
But 12:04 states the USA got what it wanted. Nor was the US goal to take Canada
@JB-yb4wn
@JB-yb4wn Рік тому
@@TheIceman567 Oh so Jefferson was just joking when he said that taking Canada would be "a mere matter of marching"? Too dumb to google? Don't worry, most Americans are.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 Рік тому
@@JB-yb4wn Jefferson wasn’t president in fact he was out of office and retired in Virginia. Your google link littery stated by two Canadian historians “The United States, meanwhile, could claim to have won the war because they didn’t lose any territory in the Treaty of Ghent, says Wesley Turner, a retired associate professor of history at Brock University. “But more importantly, the British ceased supporting First Nations people in their fight against American settlement in the Midwest.” Although this goal was “barely mentioned by U.S. President James Madison in his War Message,” Turner says, it was central to U.S. ambitions and the reason why U.S. interior states supported the war. Up to 1812, the British had been arming natives defending their lands against U.S. encroachment. Afterwards, the British dropped this support and deserted their allies. With the Treaty of Ghent in place, the United States could move into native lands without fear of British opposition - and they seized the opportunity.” And… “The Americans also looked on the conflict as a victorious second war of Independence against Britain, says Macleod. “Seeing themselves as bullied and oppressed by the British Empire, they resorted to war and compelled Britain and the world to acknowledge American sovereignty and American power.” Might wanna open that link, too dumb to open that google no worries most Canadians are 🤷‍♂️ouch!
@biggibbs4678
@biggibbs4678 Рік тому
@@JB-yb4wn America is the reason Google exists. Anyone who wants to start a business leaves the stagnating shitholes of Europe and Canada then starts it in the US.
@leroysanchino
@leroysanchino Рік тому
@@JB-yb4wn Jesus bro what’s with all the hate
@madeyemoody3884
@madeyemoody3884 2 роки тому
US: Declares War Britain: Repeals trade restrictions before receiving declaration. US: Well this is awkward…
@notapplicable531
@notapplicable531 3 роки тому
For the record: 1. At the time of this war, Toronto didn't exist. The community that did exist was named York. You didn't mention that the Americans captured York, the capital of Upper Canada, and burned it to the ground. That was one reason the British burned Washington after they captured it. Payback. 2. For that matter, Ottawa didn't exist. However, in the aftermath of this war, it was decided to construct the Rideau Canal so as to expedite troop movements should a similar conflict arise again. The building of the canal (1826-1832) created a community at the northern end of the canal system known as Bytown, named after Lieutenant-Colonel John By, the person in charge of building the canal. It was only renamed Ottawa in 1855. For someone dealing in History, a little more accuracy is in order.
@bubbasbigblast8563
@bubbasbigblast8563 3 роки тому
The fire at York has a disputed cause: no one knows who actually started it, but the Americans did try to put it out. It certainly wasn't done under orders.
@therealunclevanya
@therealunclevanya 3 роки тому
He is an American, they know shit about history
@carleighw
@carleighw 3 роки тому
@@bubbasbigblast8563 the Americans also burned the town of Niagara-on-the-Lake, not just government buildings but all private businesses and homes leaving the vast majority of the town homeless in December in Canada, as they retreated, which isn’t disputed, and is another reason the White House was burned.
@Eddythebeast666
@Eddythebeast666 3 роки тому
@@bubbasbigblast8563 With the Death of Pike from the magazine explosion the USA lost control of its troops. Which one specifically started the looting & pillaging is like trying to identify which bean made you fart...
@caryboy2006
@caryboy2006 3 роки тому
More accuracy? In 13 minutes. 🤣🤣🤣
@garolys7022
@garolys7022 3 роки тому
Some say that the war still rages on in this very comment section...
@GGT950
@GGT950 3 роки тому
Haha. There seems to be some disagreement
@CountryLifestyle2023
@CountryLifestyle2023 3 роки тому
Well at least we know who won!
@CountryLifestyle2023
@CountryLifestyle2023 3 роки тому
@Adam It was a truly unique war. Each side has the potential to claim victory. But in my opinion, Canada won. We fought off the americans and defended our land. And like you said the war essentially established Canadiam nationalism. In school its taught that if the americans didn't attack, that we would of willingly joined america in a few years, or decades. But instead it helped rally Canada as a nation and provide a sense of national pride. Different countries teach different things. It interesting to see history from someone else's view
@samiasegero5484
@samiasegero5484 3 роки тому
haha yup
@CharlesM84
@CharlesM84 2 роки тому
😂😂😂😂
@M4l4z4n
@M4l4z4n Рік тому
Hi- I subscribe your channel for long time - good work, keep doing it! It is always problem to keep as much information as possible from one hand and to keep movie length 'acceptable' from the other hand. Well done! I am wondering what kind of software do you use for animating your maps?
@juliechs8336
@juliechs8336 Рік тому
The Bank Of England's 1st 20 year central bank charter in the USA ended in 1811. The US was able to keep Britain from taking the Louisianan territory, but issued a 2nd, 20 year bank charter in 1816. After it's end in 1836 no other charter would be issued until December 23, 1913, when most of congress had left for holiday, the bankers created a perpetual charter whose shareholders are private.
@darrenlesueur4785
@darrenlesueur4785 3 місяці тому
all wars are banker wars
@TheJakecakes
@TheJakecakes Місяць тому
This is the crux of it.
@gerardeggenburger5386
@gerardeggenburger5386 2 роки тому
Canadians: we won!! Americans: we won! natives: we lost..... British: what war?
@sab6261
@sab6261 2 роки тому
Uh no. For most Americans it's also "what war?"
@leroysanchino
@leroysanchino Рік тому
And now the uk is a tiny island the size of Florida that’s ruled by a 90 yr old woman
@davemoss6976
@davemoss6976 Рік тому
I thought Lonnie Donnegan won
@davemoss6976
@davemoss6976 Рік тому
@@leroysanchino the old lady rules over a lot more than the British Isles.
@davemoss6976
@davemoss6976 Рік тому
@@leroysanchino Florida will soon be a lot smaller due to failure to act over co2 emissions
@jamesomalley9487
@jamesomalley9487 3 роки тому
There was a small mention that New England refused to invade Montreal, but you should also mention that New England was close to breaking off from America because of this war, and that when the revolutionary war started it was initially envisioned that New England would be its own country, not all of the 13 colonies. They even flew New England and Massachusetts flags in the battle of Lexington and concord.
@natedoug5305
@natedoug5305 3 роки тому
This is exactly why I think Boston should be the capital of the US not DC
@giantsfan714
@giantsfan714 3 роки тому
@@natedoug5305 ew boston
@sachemofboston3649
@sachemofboston3649 3 роки тому
Adversary American Baltimore is in Maryland, not New England
@CountryLifestyle2023
@CountryLifestyle2023 3 роки тому
@@natedoug5305 Didnt we seize and hold Boston? And raid DC. I think you need a safer capitol more in land.
@CountryLifestyle2023
@CountryLifestyle2023 3 роки тому
@Chayse Larsson Not Toronto. But yes, first you guys commited war crimes and in retaliation your capital was burned down. Thats what the USA does, commit war crimes and than brags about it as a good thing. How many presidents are war criminals ? Sry how many aren't? Lol
@opticnerve8927
@opticnerve8927 Рік тому
It was not England as the act of union between Scotland and England was already in place, it was the United Kingdom of Great Britain 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@johnholt890
@johnholt890 2 місяці тому
Americans struggle with that concept. In fact England ceased to be an independent sovereign nation in the reign of Edward 1 when it effectively merged with Wales.
@asdfbeau
@asdfbeau 2 місяці тому
@@johnholt890 Americans struggle with it because we're not used to considering such small parts of the globe. Seriously, there's 8 billion people on the planet; you expect us to care about your intra-island affections?
@dezretrogamer3869
@dezretrogamer3869 8 місяців тому
nice video man thanks for the info!!💯
@DimBeam1
@DimBeam1 3 роки тому
1:40 START
@fieldmarshalbaltimore1329
@fieldmarshalbaltimore1329 3 роки тому
Thank you
@danishkfd
@danishkfd 3 роки тому
Thanks
@maryocecilyo3372
@maryocecilyo3372 3 роки тому
Obrigado!
@susactivities6982
@susactivities6982 3 роки тому
Gracias
@zoevaldez6723
@zoevaldez6723 3 роки тому
Thanks
@ryangerrard4048
@ryangerrard4048 3 роки тому
America: Canada needs some freedom Canadians: Thanks for your concern, but we will politely decline!
@PrivateMcPrivate
@PrivateMcPrivate 3 роки тому
Lol
@Brock1812
@Brock1812 3 роки тому
More like “sorry but if it’s okay with you, we politely decline”
@Brock1812
@Brock1812 3 роки тому
@Smited One Their were natives who fought against the british and then switched sides to fight for the british. Some of my Mackenzie side rebelled against the British colonial government in the 1830's as well.
@kamanashiskar9203
@kamanashiskar9203 3 роки тому
@Smited One Well, 2/3 conflicts that your ancestors helped in were won by the British.
@bigyin2586
@bigyin2586 3 роки тому
Ryan Gerrard Canadians: ...and why don't you go back to your plantations- perhaps you can also entertain some European autocrats/dictators there.
@Giavani-wq7gb
@Giavani-wq7gb Рік тому
Excellent video. Concise and informative.
@oliversherman2414
@oliversherman2414 Рік тому
I love your channel keep up the great stuff
@LeeGee
@LeeGee 3 роки тому
I feel for the native Americans, abandoned by everyone.
@StruanRobertson29
@StruanRobertson29 3 роки тому
Native american woman are hot
@ophiolatreia93
@ophiolatreia93 3 роки тому
@@StruanRobertson29 how?
@StruanRobertson29
@StruanRobertson29 3 роки тому
@@ophiolatreia93 the usual way. Ps gongrats on your name,very noble
@farhanmohammad4807
@farhanmohammad4807 3 роки тому
At the end..they all settle for the skin colour.
@StruanRobertson29
@StruanRobertson29 3 роки тому
@@farhanmohammad4807 ?
@boyscouts83712
@boyscouts83712 3 роки тому
Um you missed The Battle of New Orleans in 1815. It was Andrew Jackson's shining moment
@chestertnted
@chestertnted 3 роки тому
Andrew Jackson said the Treaty of Ghent would of been abrogated, and the war continued, if he had lost.
@jeremygilbert7989
@jeremygilbert7989 3 роки тому
And here I thought his shining moment was that time he nearly bludgeoned a failed assassin to death with his cane and had to be pulled off by his guards. The guy was a monster to the natives but, man, did he ever go hard on basically everything he ever did. XD
@treystewart731
@treystewart731 3 роки тому
I think it's because despite the fact that it's a famous battle, it had no real impact on the war because a peace treaty had already been signed before the battle even happened.
@boyscouts83712
@boyscouts83712 3 роки тому
@@treystewart731 yeah, but no one in America knew that because it takes months for news of the treaty to travel from the snow covered fields of Belgium to the rain soaked swamps of Louisiana.
@davidyoung2111
@davidyoung2111 3 роки тому
Oh, hey your right. Andrew Jackson kicked ass.
@matthewmcdonald1301
@matthewmcdonald1301 2 роки тому
The guy is really downplaying the how much the battle for upper Canada was fought by people from the area. The British didn't put a whole lot of effort into the upper canadian battles. The local peoples knew the terrain and lead a lot of the more strategic actions. This rhetoric of the noble Americans fighting off colonial britian is romantic but it was never that true. The Americans were just as interested in colonizing Canada as they were native lands. The American revolution was largely a civil war. In the war of 1812 many of the people fighting on the british side were Americans who moved north after the American revolution(a civil war from their point of view) Like the American revolution the british were not nearly as involved as Americans like to suggest. It was far more locally born peoples doing a large amount of the fighting. This idea that it was native guys with bows and arrow and british boys from London isn't at all accurate. Upper Canada was a mish mash of Americans(who were called loyalist), natives/mixed race natives/descendants of Fur Trappers and French Canadians. In the big picture the Brits were making far more money from colonies in the Caribbean/Africa/Asia. Their attachment to Canada was never ever that strong. It was far more Canadians wanting british support than vice versa. Canada has always been a country that likes to play ethnicity card whenever it makes political sense, when in reality most Canadians have always been mixed in one for or another. Whether it being "British Canadians" who were far more Americanized than they want to admit, French Canadians trying to pretend anglophones were more english than they actually were, or people trying to make the unsubstantiated claim that native groups were in any way a unified group. A lot of the "native" were people who had partial british and french ancestry. They used modern technologies/weapons/tools/ideas etc.
@user-eq5xq1uz3j
@user-eq5xq1uz3j 20 днів тому
*grows up in Western NY in the early 21st century, and then learns more of the truth about the war of 1812 from a UKposts video than ever from school.*
@lacalikush2993
@lacalikush2993 3 роки тому
Didn’t New England almost break away from America too?
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
No they wanted more power in government.
@shindari
@shindari 3 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 The South... on the other hand...
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@@shindari what during the civil war? That was over keeping their slaves.
@Eggnog18
@Eggnog18 3 роки тому
There were talks about New England seceding (namely the Hartford Convention, if I recall correctly), but it never seriously amounted to much. New England was never supportive about the war, though.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@@Eggnog18 in fact there was no mention of secession in the Hartford convention.
@yungstallion2201
@yungstallion2201 3 роки тому
Most Brits forget it happened because it was so insignificant lmao
@theinnerparty5295
@theinnerparty5295 3 роки тому
Defeating Napoleon overshadowed it. We remember Waterloo and Trafalgar, Nelson and Wellington. It was far more important, as otherwise Britain would have been invaded. Napoleon was a very dangerous military genius and had to be stopped.
@stephenjenkins7971
@stephenjenkins7971 2 роки тому
Yeah, big powers can't really recall all of the minor conflicts it was embroiled in. Just like the US can't really recall the part it played in the Falklands War. For the US, that was very insignificant as well.
@compatriot852
@compatriot852 2 роки тому
For the US, most of British empires last year's collapsing weren't noticed.
@yungstallion2201
@yungstallion2201 2 роки тому
@@compatriot852 Irrelevant but okay😐
@GaaGaaGaaGaaGaaGaa2
@GaaGaaGaaGaaGaaGaa2 2 роки тому
@@compatriot852 I'm British and didn't notice, yet you did? You've proper nibbled there mate
@Steve-pq1nx
@Steve-pq1nx 2 роки тому
This is my first time to know about this war...thanks for sharing
@Notthemikeurlookin4
@Notthemikeurlookin4 Рік тому
I'm from Buffalo and we're taught about how the British burned down the settlement during this conflict. There is also a sunken British frigate in the Niagara river off of the Black Rock neighborhood.
@whatismyusername69
@whatismyusername69 Рік тому
Yo Im from buffalo too
@sachemofboston3649
@sachemofboston3649 3 роки тому
No mention of the New England Conference in 1812? New England almost broke away from the US.
@jamesomalley9487
@jamesomalley9487 3 роки тому
True, New Englanders saw themselves as a different ethnic group from the rest of Americans, and to a certain extent still do today. When the revolution started in Massachusetts they were originally fighting for New England independence, not independence for all of the 13 colonies.
@jackconnolly5308
@jackconnolly5308 3 роки тому
James O'Malley New Englander is still it’s own defined ethnic group with their own culture today imo. They have more culture than any other part of the country
@randyross5630
@randyross5630 3 роки тому
Ross' burnt the White House Down, same Night or Day a Flag 1st Stilled by Ross was still there... All you need to know... Ross! Ross! Ross!
@olajong2315
@olajong2315 3 роки тому
@Adversary American A longer one yes but a culture is still a culture. America has a culture, they are different from the rest who are nonAmericans and that enough is American which are all an off branch of the New England culture which came from the 13 colonies.
@PrivateMcPrivate
@PrivateMcPrivate 3 роки тому
@@jackconnolly5308 They are also the only part of the country that still has a lot of economic ties to the UK,the only other being New York (My state),the buffer state for some reason.
@mykincadult-store1219
@mykincadult-store1219 3 роки тому
I'm am British and proud but America is close to my heart. I don't know why. It just is. Fun fact for reading this comment, I had an ancestor disappear at the Roanoke settlement in the 1580s. I also have my family that immigrated in the 50/60s. America, the UK loves you.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
The same from an American living in Britain. This war was a a stalemate.
@epiczander8552
@epiczander8552 2 роки тому
Despite our countries getting off to a rocky start, most Americans love the UK and we feel the same way about you that you feel about us. 🇬🇧☮️💙💪🇺🇲 Allies forever
@HavanaSyndrome69
@HavanaSyndrome69 2 роки тому
Thank :]
@spen9747
@spen9747 2 роки тому
The special relationship
@graham5716
@graham5716 2 роки тому
virgin "But the British won!!!!!!!" "NOOOOOO" vs the chad "It was a stalemate."
@TJBEATS97
@TJBEATS97 2 роки тому
The US lost this war it wasn’t a war of independence. If that’s the case, then any war is a war of independence if u think the country being lost is the only thing that constitutes a winner. US clearly lost they gained no territory only lost
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
Incorrect the USA far from lost and they did gain territory west Florida and Carleton island. And defeated Britain’s ally the natives which were trying to block westward expansion. Please study you won’t look so dumb next time.
@onix2130
@onix2130 2 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 Apart from more people agree with him and he's actually right. Please study you won’t look so dumb next time.
@luke2393
@luke2393 2 роки тому
@@onix2130 I would call it a draw truthfully, the Americans burned York(Toronto)the capital of Canada, the British also couldn't mobilize enough troops to do a full scale invasion. Also, The Battle of New Orleans was a crushing success by the Americans which prevented further British expansion in the southern US, plus both sides lost and gained territory.
@blutimberry
@blutimberry 2 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 The USA invaded Canada and FAILED, the British invaded the east coast, burned the white house and just got bored and Left
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
@@blutimberry incorrect the USA invaded successfully defeated the natives burnt York and was in Canada until July 1815. “Got bored “ not it was called the battle of Baltimore.
@JamesWilliams-gp6ek
@JamesWilliams-gp6ek Рік тому
You completely overlooked the victorious Battle of Plattsburgh September 11, 1814.
@chrisvickers7928
@chrisvickers7928 4 місяці тому
And the British victories of Chrysler's Farm and Chateauguay.
@Floydrush-zx9wz
@Floydrush-zx9wz 3 роки тому
Thank you that was well stated and well explained, an excellent 13 minutes.
@braynzzthere7923
@braynzzthere7923 3 роки тому
Thank you soo much, this was our topic in class and i was researching endlessly in Wikipedia, you just saved my life.
@juansantana8448
@juansantana8448 2 роки тому
"We fired one shot and the brits begun a running on down the Mississippi. to the Gold of Mexico..."
@randomtaiwan5085
@randomtaiwan5085 Рік тому
Ah, nothing like watching some good content like Knowledgia 🥰🥰
@jacqueslefave4296
@jacqueslefave4296 Рік тому
Conspicuous by it's absence is the mention of the Battle of New Orleans. Although the Treaty of Ghent had been signed, the news didn't reach the United States for about a month and both sides continued to fight vigorously. General Andrew Jackson commanded forces that drove the British into a pocket in and around New Orleans, and in a pitched battle stretching over about a week, the British were forced to surrender. There were a couple of key reasons why, 1) The Americans had mostly rifles, that could outrange the British smoothbore musket, and was far more accurate. 2) A critical mistake the British made was to stack up what was available for fortification, they had a large quantity of burlap sugar bags from the local sugar cane crop, and when they got wet, sticky and gooey. When we shot bullets and cannon balls into these bags, the sticky goo/syrup got into the lock work of their cannons and muskets, and they could not fight effectively. A surrender was negotiated. News of the victory reached Washington at the same time as news of the peace treaty, and in the popular imagination and the newspapers of the time, Americans credited the Battle of New Orleans with British peace, and Andre Jackson did nothing to disabuse them of this error, and rode the game into the Presidency. A footnote from the American side.
@Paolo-sw8ys
@Paolo-sw8ys Рік тому
I didn't think much of this doc
@trevorparks5713
@trevorparks5713 Рік тому
Interesting tidbit you might like to know is that the British diplomats were delaying the treaty to give the British forces a chance to take New Orleans and handicap American expansion
@snazzydares8787
@snazzydares8787 Рік тому
I just thought I would mention that the Americans were forced in to surrender because the brits and Canadians won the war
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 Рік тому
@@snazzydares8787 actually they didn’t. Where did the USA surrender I’d love to read this. Fiction can be fun 😂😂 in fact 12 minutes literally states what the USA got. Britain failed in its goal of a natives Indian buffer state, Maine( which the British occupied east port Maine until 1818) and Minnesota to control the upper Mississippi. Doesn’t sound like the British won any thing while the USA got West Florida after forcing the British out, the Northwest territory it had been fight over since 1785 end of impressing and British support for the natives. Study before commenting you won’t embarrass yourself next time.
@snazzydares8787
@snazzydares8787 Рік тому
Mate we burned down your White House and the peace treaty at the end of the war the British wanted most of the Louisiana perches the only reason we didn’t was because it would upset the balance of power in Europe.
@rb239rtr
@rb239rtr 3 роки тому
General Brock- a Canadian hero very well remembered
@thestaffordshireiv4943
@thestaffordshireiv4943 2 роки тому
I must say, his last stand at Queenston heights is incredible.
@safeysmith6720
@safeysmith6720 Рік тому
He was not Canadian though, you understand that right?
@rb239rtr
@rb239rtr Рік тому
@@safeysmith6720 I am a Canadian, I know the history of Canada, I know that General Brock was born in the motherland, I know that his leadership was essential in defeating the american invaders. With his planning and preparations in the years before the war of 1812 , with his early victories in the war and the victory on the day of his death he could be identified as the single most important individual in Upper Canada. SO, yes he is a Canadian hero, without him Canada might not exist.
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle 10 місяців тому
​@@rb239rtryou know Canada wasn't a thing yet, right? 1867 formation of Canada and domestic government. 1931 foreign policy control. Finally got a patriated constitution in the 1980s. Since the Canadian constitution was still a British law until the 1980s, one could argue Canada was not an independent nation until then. Its okay, no need for the little man syndrome. Grew up on the border, nothing but positive experiences with Canadians. Nothing wrong with being part of the British Empire either during that time. Gave us both all the ideals we formed our nations with.
@rb239rtr
@rb239rtr 10 місяців тому
@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle WTF. I think you have the little man syndrome. All this from me saying that Brock stands as a Canadian hero, which he is. Statues, streets, avenues, university all named after him in respect of what he meant for Canada. Geesh. BTW, the creation of Canada has certainly led to a different path for Canada's society vis a vis American society. Good points in both societies, but when the chips are down, one is certainly better.
@Piett2
@Piett2 3 роки тому
No word about the bankers behind this? How about this quote "Either the application for the renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war". Seems kind of relevant.
@whocares2544
@whocares2544 2 роки тому
Title: America vs British. Me: Are we thinking same people?🤔
@bartolomeestebanmurillo4459
@bartolomeestebanmurillo4459 3 місяці тому
The War of 1812 is an interesting conflict in that it's barely mentioned in British history books and most Americans have never heard of it but it's very well known in Canadian culture because it help unite a proto-nation.
@damackabet.4611
@damackabet.4611 3 місяці тому
it is actually well known in usa, well certain battles of of it, the burning of the capital is known but everyone forgets about the burning of york, and the battle of New Orleans which was an american victory great enough it has a few songs about it. but to be fair to non-history people the war accomplished very little for both sides, it got british to fuck off messing with american shipping, but realistically by the time it occurred they were about to stop due to napoleon being out of picture. So its no wonder its forgotten.
@liammclaughlin982
@liammclaughlin982 3 місяці тому
Yeah they fucked off after burning the white house 🤣
@UserName-om6ft
@UserName-om6ft 2 місяці тому
@@liammclaughlin982 the US burnt down the Canadian capital York (Toronto) in 1813 so it cancels out, and sent your limey boys packing at New Orleans
@UserName_om6ft
@UserName_om6ft Місяць тому
@@liammclaughlin982 Dont say that it hurts my feelings
@DC-cq3fj
@DC-cq3fj 3 роки тому
Please more videos like these!! I LOVE THEM
@ttamdude
@ttamdude 3 роки тому
This was excellent. Kinda sad you didn’t mention the Battle of New Orleans that happened just after the signing of the peace treaty. I’m from the area and there’s a lot of “pride” in that and it’s pretty much how we ended up with Andrew Jackson being such a major player in the early US. Much love!
@johns8249
@johns8249 2 роки тому
Good song
@juansantana8448
@juansantana8448 2 роки тому
"We fired one shot and the brits begun a running on down the Mississippi. to the Gold of Mexico..."
@johnmullholand2044
@johnmullholand2044 2 роки тому
They also neglected to mention the Battle of Fallen Timbers, which opened the Old Northwest to settlement.
@spen9747
@spen9747 2 роки тому
I wondered why it wasn’t mentioned
@eliseowens9572
@eliseowens9572 2 роки тому
Also how he escaped with only 71 of his men dead…
@topspot4834
@topspot4834 Рік тому
Great documentary. I continue to be amazed by how much Napoleon accomplished in his lifetime.
@markmaish7173
@markmaish7173 9 місяців тому
He got Joaquin Phoenix to play him in a movie, that is very impressive!😊😊
@edwardpapak4234
@edwardpapak4234 Рік тому
I live like 2 blocks from fort Malden, and was at fort Erie a few weeks ago for the reenactment.
@marypetrie930
@marypetrie930 3 роки тому
A British officer of the time said it was an unnatural war between kindred peoples and he was glad it was over.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
Yes, that was John Le Couteur
@juansantana8448
@juansantana8448 2 роки тому
Right, that is what the brits would like to believe and make believe, but they "forgot, there were many other nations in the US territory, and the brits and their descendants are just one the many. "We fired one shot and the brits begun a running on down the Mississippi. to the Gold of Mexico..."
@juliusnorr3041
@juliusnorr3041 2 роки тому
@@juansantana8448 I mean the spaniards were Just one of the many aswell, their Business was slaughtering natives as it was the US's
@marypetrie930
@marypetrie930 2 роки тому
@@juansantana8448 The original 13 Colonies were overwhelmingly British, with some German and Dutch. The dominant language was and still is English, Culture, Law system and political structures were based on British. So what on earth are you talking about😆
@MoonCobalt
@MoonCobalt 2 роки тому
this is the most confusing war because there isn’t an oversimplified video
@theophilhist6455
@theophilhist6455 Рік тому
A very good intro to the war. for context.....but no mention of Plattsburgh, Bladensburg and New Orleans surprised me
@44fastgun
@44fastgun 2 роки тому
Another scuffle causing tensions at the time, although to a lesser degree, was the rivalry between US and Britain on the frontier to capture the fur trade, particularly in Oregon territory. US fur trappers established a trading post on the mouth of the Columbia just before British trappers arrived and elbowed the US trappers out. After 1812, the countries agreed to shared exploitation of the territory, which removed the international factor and placed the rivalry on the local companies themselves. Eventually, US expansion and emigration would convert Oregon into a US territory.
@brucewelty7684
@brucewelty7684 Рік тому
Hmmmm, I would not call that a victory, considering the political disaster that Cali, OR and WA are currently!
@kevcaratacus9428
@kevcaratacus9428 11 місяців тому
A lesser degree!!! You think! Britain's tiny island was at war with Napoleons French & allies among others . Our army was spread around the world building the biggest empire ever known. ...lol, fur trade wars , definitely of lesser significance.. I guess that's why British schools don't mention it. ..hmm let's talk Napoleon or fur wars lol ..
@alanandconnielast
@alanandconnielast 5 місяців тому
The British were busy taking over the world.
@garryej
@garryej 3 роки тому
An article in The Smithsonian Magazine about 20 years ago stated several things; Britain had ended slavery in 1807 but US slavers were still trading, sometimes under false, often UK flags. The Royal Navy looked down upon such behavior, hence some of the impressment. Also the article went on to tell how, at that time, many of the "Canadian" colonists were former United Empire Loyalists, former American colonists who did not support the Revolution and had escaped to Canada and who had left friends, often family and properties in the US. As this video explains, many Americans likewise had no stomach for war with their former friends and relatives. Had not "War Hawks" instigated this war, scholars believe that eventual union of the two colonies would have been inevitable, given the common interests of both 'countries' at the time. The War of 1812 put a permanent end to that dream! Also, as taught in Canadian schools, the attack on Washington was felt to be in retaliation for a raid on York (incorrectly labeled as Toronto in the video).
@Eddythebeast666
@Eddythebeast666 3 роки тому
You have done your homework... I'm going to look up that Smithsonian Magazine article... I've seen those points made before far less clearly elsewhere while researching, events. Thanks for the reference.
@phoenixrose1192
@phoenixrose1192 2 роки тому
Your post deserves more thumbs ups. Thank you.
@notmyrealname608
@notmyrealname608 Рік тому
"Britain had ended slavery in 1807" - - - - Yeah, tell that to Nigeria or the Indian sub-continent.
@garryej
@garryej Рік тому
@@notmyrealname608 colonialism still goes on today. UK not being the only perpetrator!
@stephenkammerling9479
@stephenkammerling9479 Рік тому
I think British left Washington shortly after burning it down. It had all the appearance of payback for the American burning of York, current day Toronto. That war likely doesn't occur without the war in Europe. The war likely was the major factor in British seizing Americans at sea. Years later, in early years of Civil War, an American ship seized several Confederate soldiers on a British ship. Lincoln smartly intervened quickly, having the men returned to the British. Lincoln's comment was "One war at a time boys." All this, because some American naval officer was risking war with Great Britain in order to seize a few rebel soldiers who may have been fleeing the war anyway. It seems people never learn.
@d.m.collins1501
@d.m.collins1501 3 роки тому
I like it! One quibble: why no mention of the Battle of New Orleans? I thought for sure you were going to jump in with it after mentioning the month-long lag between the armistice and the end of fighting.
@MorpheusTheBro
@MorpheusTheBro 2 роки тому
It might be because it had no effect on the outcome of the war. It was just a minor footnote in the grand scheme of things, which is sad to say considering how many people lost their lives in that battle.
@archivesoffantasy5560
@archivesoffantasy5560 Рік тому
@Sean Greenfield it’s not entirely the same, New Orleans ended up happening after the treaty of Ghent. Waterloo happened before Napoleon’s second abdication, Waterloo caused the abdication.
@sutty8526
@sutty8526 Рік тому
😂
@spehhhsssmarineer8961
@spehhhsssmarineer8961 11 місяців тому
@@archivesoffantasy5560 The battle of New Orleans guaranteed American expansion.
@archivesoffantasy5560
@archivesoffantasy5560 11 місяців тому
@@spehhhsssmarineer8961 American expansion was going to happen either way. Natives couldn’t stop that onslaught.
@cortwill4085
@cortwill4085 Рік тому
Blake, That's awesome news!
@dannyarcher6370
@dannyarcher6370 Рік тому
This war is not talked about enough. So interesting.
@nathanhileman3848
@nathanhileman3848 3 роки тому
I like this short documentary! Respectfully, I think Old Hickory and the Battle of New Orleans being omitted is a miss. Though fought after the war was officially over, it is still one of them main things people think of in the War of 1812.
@JackWhite52
@JackWhite52 Рік тому
The war was still on as the treaties weren't ratified by both sides, and had the brits won the battle, they would have had every reason to abrogate the treaty and either give the land back to the Spanish or the Indians, halting westward expansion. The battle was a pivotal event in its own right.
@JohnCampbell-rn8rz
@JohnCampbell-rn8rz Рік тому
It's one of the main things Americans think of, but it was a meaningless battle except for the poor schmucks who died.
@Mrdestiny17
@Mrdestiny17 4 місяці тому
It was also one of the only major victories america had during the war
@Obi61248
@Obi61248 3 роки тому
It's crazy that during this time, Napoleon was also going around waging war on 90 percent of europe
@thevoiceless8567
@thevoiceless8567 3 роки тому
That’s why this war was a stalemate. 😉
@camm8642
@camm8642 2 роки тому
Most of the wars napoleon actually didn't start
@biggibbs4678
@biggibbs4678 Рік тому
90 percent of Europe invaded France after the revolution, Napoleon returned the favor.
@sutty8526
@sutty8526 Рік тому
And got his raw handed to him by the British and Prussians. 😂 Britain was pretty badass. There is no denying it
@camm8642
@camm8642 Рік тому
@@sutty8526 he was fighting whole coliations by the time the brits and prussians beat him he had inexperienced conscripts mostly.......and even then the brits nearly blew it even wellington said it was close.....the real badass was france at this time at war internal and externally off and on for over 20 years basically aganist numerous nations.
@OneAndOnlyJoeJoe
@OneAndOnlyJoeJoe 11 місяців тому
This was like 16% of 1812 in 16 min. There were way more battles than just a fort surrendering, Plus the amount of ships lost in 1812 was pretty big. Maybe my Vintage 1854 History book is outdated cause there's over 26+ Battles on land and 10+ On Sea. Very disappointed in this video but it did give a quick history but left out all the details of battles and what happened after wards. "Britain Takes Fort, Britain Ends War... 1812" That's the amount of info i got from this video (You made it very long just talking about governments discussing War/Policies.
@visionstudios7178
@visionstudios7178 11 місяців тому
You Said it. My Grandfather told me stories that he passed down from Generation to Generation. And Yes there were a lot more battles than a Fort being taken.
@OneAndOnlyJoeJoe
@OneAndOnlyJoeJoe 11 місяців тому
@@visionstudios7178 Old History will be Replaced with New Propaganda Ridden History. This Country isn't what it used to be. God Bless!
@lilja5323
@lilja5323 11 місяців тому
God Bless. You're Truly a Patriot!
@leedscity6881
@leedscity6881 2 роки тому
It was the same as 1776 the British always holding back/fighting in multiple wars around the world at the same time. We don't even learn about these two wars
@lasakau272
@lasakau272 2 роки тому
Imagine if Britain wasn’t fighting Napoleon in Europe….I’m American but I’m damn sure we’d be like Australia, Canada, and New Zealand today if Britain sent their full force against us
@Ooog__
@Ooog__ 2 роки тому
yea but they got India instead
@2011arish
@2011arish Рік тому
Nothing would change apart the queen would be the head of state
@kissmy_butt1302
@kissmy_butt1302 Рік тому
It would probably be facing guerilla activities like India and Afghanistan.
@biggibbs4678
@biggibbs4678 Рік тому
Have you heard of the revolutionary war...
@lasakau272
@lasakau272 Рік тому
@@biggibbs4678 that was before this though and we had help from the Spanish and French
@camerondartez9190
@camerondartez9190 3 роки тому
Will anyone ever say that napoleon is one of those people that changed the course of history itself?
@nagrom1003
@nagrom1003 3 роки тому
I believe Napoleon is pretty universally recognized as a person who changed the course of history
@shindari
@shindari 3 роки тому
@@nagrom1003 Agreed. His avarice turned France into a European "afterthought," in terms of power, after he was defeated. Russia began taking much greater interest in "European Affairs" after Napoleon invaded them. Napoleon's war was almost certainly a cause of the War of 1812. And, oh yeah, he sold America about ONE THIRD of its' present day territory, all so he could fund his war in Europe. Also... Arguments could be made that he planted the seeds that would one day lead to World War One... and everything that came afterward. So yeah... Napoleon, historically, is a pretty big deal.
@GK-ui8fv
@GK-ui8fv 3 роки тому
Yes he made the world a cohesive place - first by winning and then losing otherwise, UK was busy in its empire expansion rather than in fighting in spain, Europe. Russia, USA were not interested in Europe. Germany got unified due to these Napoleonic wars. Often memory of the wars drive the future generations - so the two world wars and previously Napoleon ´s war are driving today’s EU.
@ParagonRex
@ParagonRex 3 роки тому
Everyone literally says that, all the time. The world we live in today is a direct result of Napoleon's destabilizing the European Powers
@johnnyjoestar5193
@johnnyjoestar5193 3 роки тому
Yep, modern military tactics, revolutionary ideas, unification of Italy and Germany. The dissolvement of the HRE, and the indirect creation of all Latin American countries. All came from Napoleon. The world would be a much different place if Napoleon was never born
@colbythivierge5418
@colbythivierge5418 5 місяців тому
Love the chapter titles, I never knew the challenger disaster occurred in 1812
@GamingwithWario
@GamingwithWario 2 роки тому
very helpfull thx
@Aubury
@Aubury 3 роки тому
Careful in mentioning the 1812 war, at least in Canada. A side show for the British, Napoleon's war was the focal point for the UK. The looses were the native indian tribes.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
Are you British?
@chocomanger6873
@chocomanger6873 Рік тому
Why be careful mentioning the war in Canada? Canadians love this war.
@Quole1234
@Quole1234 5 місяців тому
@@chocomanger6873 lol
@lucasvanderhoeven3760
@lucasvanderhoeven3760 3 роки тому
I really like this video! Not many people know About this war, although it is really interesting!
@theparadigm8149
@theparadigm8149 3 роки тому
Indeed!
@julianshepherd2038
@julianshepherd2038 3 роки тому
There was nothing inevitable about American independence. If the Brits had managed to end one of the other wars it was fighting worldwide it may have had enough to defeat the Frenchie loving traitors.
@theparadigm8149
@theparadigm8149 3 роки тому
@@julianshepherd2038 I see what you mean! Perhaps, by the grace of God, we came out on top! 🇺🇸 Yeah, we were traitors to Britain, but the taxes were unfair...
@henryjohnson160
@henryjohnson160 3 роки тому
@@julianshepherd2038 There was, but the question was when. Look at Canada and all the others, US would have been much sooner. If Britain won they would be tied up in the Americas and the British Empire might have been far weaker. High cost for little gain. That's the lesson, they were constantly fighting wars and overplayed their hand taxing the colonies for the 7 years war. They were smart to cut their losses with the Revolutionary War. US was better off rebelling in the long and short term, not getting roped in with the British Empire's interests which benefitted the latter far more than the former at that point.
@hdufort
@hdufort 3 роки тому
Ask anyone who lives in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield 😂
@marnv2956
@marnv2956 Рік тому
Thank you for the info. God bless.
@cablenelsonbabygrandpiano842
@cablenelsonbabygrandpiano842 Рік тому
Very good. Thank you!
@dalirfarzan1694
@dalirfarzan1694 3 роки тому
The Battle of New Orleans was fought AFTER the Treaty of Ghent, but was still a main factor as to why the US believed they won the war. It was a smashing victory for the United States, even though it didn't affect the peace treaty. However, it increased feelings of nationalism, patriotism, and optimism in the US and ushered in the Era of Good Feelings.
@Mister_Pedantic
@Mister_Pedantic 2 роки тому
And there was that stupid song
@larrymatrale1368
@larrymatrale1368 Рік тому
It also kept the British from controlling commerce on the Mississippi and thereby slowing down US expansion westward. It was a critical battle.
@archivesoffantasy5560
@archivesoffantasy5560 Рік тому
- Wins a battle after the treaty has confirmed a stalemate - that battle shows we won ?
@Whoami691
@Whoami691 Рік тому
@@larrymatrale1368 IT was not not nearly as critical as it is made out to be by America. It was against a diversonary force designed to draw out American soldiers. And it did.
@larrymatrale1368
@larrymatrale1368 Рік тому
@@Whoami691 It was critical. The Treaty of Ghent stated that whatever you controlled at the end of the war , you got to keep. That would have given the British control of New Orleans and by default most of the Mississippi River commerce. That definitely would have had an impact on American growth.
@markstevens3078
@markstevens3078 2 роки тому
You have to talk about Jackson's victory over the British at New Orleans. It helped get Jackson elected the 7th President. He then had a huge impact on history.
@4realjacob637
@4realjacob637 2 роки тому
Not a good one tho. Dude was a real murderer
@oyunbold9186
@oyunbold9186 2 роки тому
@@4realjacob637 i think that was the point
@sealy3
@sealy3 Рік тому
Jackson is the only President to pay off the Federal Debt.
@misaelfraga8196
@misaelfraga8196 Рік тому
@@4realjacob637 he became the first non-nobility to hold office after succeeding John Quincy Adam's. That being said he was a bloody murderer probably buring in Hell at this point.
@chocomanger6873
@chocomanger6873 Рік тому
No idea what you're talking about.
@christopherjones8448
@christopherjones8448 Рік тому
The war of saving face, Where a country that was about to get everything they wanted from another country that couldn't be bothered anymore, and declared war anyway. While that country with much bigger issues (Like bankrupting itself trying to fight France) fought anyway just to not seem weak
@erickrobertson7089
@erickrobertson7089 Рік тому
You need to clarify a few things... Barring the colonists from Western expansion was more of a policy tool to encourage Indian loyalty to the Crown over the French. Keeping this ban after the Treaty of Paris by encouraging friction between the US and Native nations was not the only tool Britain employed as they also occupied areas clearly American as defined by the same treaty. Impressment of Americans at sea was substantial, some 15,000. So undermanned and compensated was the Royal Navy tha it included other foreigners as well. It was the Jeffersonian Republicans, not the Republican party, which included the Warhwaks. A group of politicians from the west and south led by Henry Clay. It may have happened after the Treaty of Ghent but I think the Battle of New Orleans would have been worth mentioning... I wonder what the thoughts of important persons were at the time, American and English. I'm thinking of Lord North's words after hearing the outcome of Yorktown. Thanks for the upload.
@oliverduke1173
@oliverduke1173 Рік тому
compare and contrast to donbass, present day. Or Israel 1948
@realhawaii5o
@realhawaii5o 3 роки тому
In Portuguese history books this war is like 2 lines within pages and pages of the Napoleonic wars. What a nice coalition victory!
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
This war wasn’t apart of the European war.
@theant9821
@theant9821 3 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 it was a part of the napoleonic wars, and a minor part at that. Remember that the USA was a relatively small and insignificant country outside of north America at the time, France and Britain were in a power struggle to be top dog, Portugal and Spain were probably still more important countries in global influence than the USA at the time, which was probably about level with Prussia at the time.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
@@theant9821 I don’t doubt that. The fact is the USA just wanted to be left alone.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
@Dank Waifu not apart of that war it’s was its own war.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
@Dank Waifu but didn’t involve Napoleon
@kauffner
@kauffner 3 роки тому
Based on the timeline given here, the outbreak of the war is inexplicable. President Madison was seeking reelection in 1812. He hoped a war with Britian would boost his chances. Why would he think this? Because the War Hawks had done very well in the 1810 midterms. Congress had abolished the War Department earlier that year. In other words, the politicians didn't see the War Hawks coming until they arrived.
@JB-yb4wn
@JB-yb4wn Рік тому
Then what was the Secretary of War, William Eustis doing then? Sticking his thumb up his ass?
@LFX27
@LFX27 Рік тому
The Americans were like “yeah we better begin peace talks now Napoleon is done for otherwise we’re next”😂😂😂
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 Рік тому
But yet it was the british that offered talks.
@UserName-om6ft
@UserName-om6ft Рік тому
tell me you dont know anything about history without telling me you dont know anything about history
@occasionalsipsofwater4852
@occasionalsipsofwater4852 Рік тому
I like how this video plays the 1812 overture in the background.
@stephenelberfeld8175
@stephenelberfeld8175 2 роки тому
He failed to mention that US troops and their Indian allies burned Queenston, the capitol of Upper Canada. The Brittish burned Washington in retaliation.
@misaelfraga8196
@misaelfraga8196 Рік тому
Let is be known that the fire were not done by any such orders, and the Americans did try to put it out.
@chocomanger6873
@chocomanger6873 Рік тому
Washington was burned in retaliation for the Americans taking over Fort York for a week or so.
@boney4947
@boney4947 Рік тому
@@misaelfraga8196 I've never heard that before, I'd believe it but I'd like to see some evidence for it before putting my faith into that statement.
@rogermetzger7335
@rogermetzger7335 2 роки тому
According to Encyclopedia Britannica "Battle of Plattsburgh, also called the Battle of Lake Champlain, (6-11 September 1814), battle during the War of 1812 that resulted in an important American victory on Lake Champlain that saved New York from possible British invasion via the Hudson River valley." I realize this video is a very brief summary but I was surprised this battle wasn't mentioned.
@JohnCampbell-rn8rz
@JohnCampbell-rn8rz Рік тому
The British had no intention of invading the U.S., except to discourage them from their futile effort to conquer British North America.
@KartikKumar-tz1wm
@KartikKumar-tz1wm 2 роки тому
I love History .Please make more good vedios like this 😗
@Austin_Schulz
@Austin_Schulz 3 роки тому
I'd call this one a tie, but the British easily could have won if they actually cared.
@stephenjenkins7971
@stephenjenkins7971 2 роки тому
This logic pretty much applies to every "big power vs small power" war.
@blasted4094
@blasted4094 2 роки тому
If they did, Napoleon would have the opportunity to strike against the homeland of Britain.
@alienlife7754
@alienlife7754 2 роки тому
So how do you explain the loss at New Orleans? The Brits got their asses handed to them and sued for peace. Just because they don’t want to remember it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
@solomonstemplers
@solomonstemplers 2 роки тому
@@alienlife7754 it seems the US were repeatedly having they're asses handed to them early on tho ay!. And if the treaty had not been signed then the US were inevitably going to loose they're independence. Britain had just defeated one of the largest professional military's in the world at that time so get over yourself.
@solomonstemplers
@solomonstemplers 2 роки тому
@The Eagle Beyond The Stars what's false i said nothing about winning or loosing my comment was to the OP his remarks were the UK got they're asses handed to them. Thats false.
@danielfield2570
@danielfield2570 3 роки тому
Always a point to note you hardly mentioned the wider context. At the start of 1812 Britain was singlehandedly in conflict with all of mainland Europe at the time, under a massive continental embargo (which is the reason why we drink tea btw) and yet still managed to fend off an attack on a continent away.
@thevoiceless8567
@thevoiceless8567 3 роки тому
The wider context doesn’t appear to exist in ‘Merica judging by some of the comments on here, some of them are even convinced they won! 🙄 But as a Brit, thanks for your comment. 👍
@bc4065
@bc4065 Рік тому
You mean.... At war with Napoleon? "All of mainland Europe" is a little hyperbolic, yea?
@sheadoherty7434
@sheadoherty7434 Рік тому
​@@bc4065check how large the French Empire was at the time
@mindfreak9674
@mindfreak9674 10 місяців тому
@bc4065 The french empire was massive back then and napoleon was running rampant. If britain wasnt focused on napoleon the americans wouldnt have lasted a week.
@ProtocolAbyss
@ProtocolAbyss 9 місяців тому
@@bc4065napoleon put a continental blockade across Europe in attempt to strangle the UK… The biggest and wealthiest empire in the world… The same people who constantly threw money blindly at countries to fight Napoleon… *Yeah*
@carpediem7778
@carpediem7778 Рік тому
One correction: Rensselaer's name was Stephen Van Rensselaer, who went on to establish Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and become Lt Governor of New York. Otherwise, excellent video!
@scottsatterthwaite4073
@scottsatterthwaite4073 Рік тому
At 7:00 the term "War Hawks" was not party specific. It was used much as we use the term "war mongers" today. Also, the "Republican Party" referred to was not the Republican party of today, which was not formed until 1858. At that time, the Democratic Republican party was sometimes referred to as Jeffersonian Republicans, or Jeffersonians, and very often just Republicans. They are the Democratic party of today.
@VCYT
@VCYT 2 роки тому
USA : ''lets burn down the Canadian government building, as no one cares'' Canada : ''you think you can get away with that dude''
@juansantana8448
@juansantana8448 2 роки тому
"We fired one shot and the brits begun a running on down the Mississippi. to the Gold of Mexico..."
@dmeads5663
@dmeads5663 2 роки тому
It’s not like Canada did anything in response
@Quole1234
@Quole1234 5 місяців тому
@@dmeads5663 canada beat back the united states lol
@Mark-nx5pk
@Mark-nx5pk 2 місяці тому
Canada wasn't a country, the fighting was done by British troops@@Quole1234
@Quole1234
@Quole1234 2 місяці тому
@@Mark-nx5pk much of the fighting was done by natives and Canadian militia
@seanmagee4992
@seanmagee4992 2 роки тому
Isn't it true that Madison wanted to declare war on both France and England ? Especially to quell ideas that he was being used by Napoleon or that he showed favour towards France. I believe there is a letter he sent to Jefferson where he states his desire to declare war on both. I believe he was talked out of it as declaring war on France was pointless, what could they do, but England could be attacked through attacking Canada
@mrneutronplayz8655
@mrneutronplayz8655 2 роки тому
I was at the historic battlefield at Tippecanoe. It was very small battlefield. Just outside Lafayette, Indiana.
@davidmcneill9698
@davidmcneill9698 2 роки тому
As a Brit I am proud to say our history and blood are inter twined , that we are brothers in arms to face today's world .
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 2 роки тому
Very true much love to the UK 🇬🇧🤝😂 my fiancé and kids are British btw.
@morganwheeleryear1123
@morganwheeleryear1123 2 роки тому
@@TheIceman567 Are they your kids too? If so then they are half British half American
@MonTheWell1886
@MonTheWell1886 Рік тому
🤢
@MattHibbard1993
@MattHibbard1993 9 місяців тому
🇺🇲❤️🇬🇧
@Kam-King213
@Kam-King213 5 місяців тому
The world doesn't look at it like brothers. More like a master and his pet dog.
@marksmith4892
@marksmith4892 3 роки тому
Basically, War of 1812 was one big cluster f for both sides.
@juansantana8448
@juansantana8448 2 роки тому
Yeah, and thanks to that we are not British subject - God Shave the Queen! "We fired one shot and the brits begun a running on down the Mississippi. to the Gold of Mexico..."
@thermal5831
@thermal5831 Рік тому
@@juansantana8448 wtf are you talking about, there’s nothing I can find which states that Britain wanted to take back the Americans during this war lol.
@toddsullivan6962
@toddsullivan6962 3 роки тому
Not sure I agree with the comment at 8:15 saying the British were well prepared. They were in Europe because of Napoleon but in Canada Brock had next to nothing to fight a much larger US army which is why they went on the offensive and acquired the aid of the Natives. At least that's what I've always read and heard from various sources.
@Delogros
@Delogros 3 роки тому
Technically the US regular army was only twice as large as Brocks British regulars and the British regulars in 1812 where noticeably better (as you would expect from a country that had been at constant war for 20 years vs a country that had been at peace) but the US had massive militia forces available which is where the real disparity in forces comes from at the start of the war, something like 300,000 people in British colonies and a few Million in the USA, might be as high as 7 Million I don't off hand remember.
@garymeyers7983
@garymeyers7983 Рік тому
TY for that!
@aa-up4sf
@aa-up4sf Рік тому
Dear General: We have met the enemy and they are ours. Two ships, two brigs, one schooner and one sloop. Yours with great respect and esteem, O.H. Perry Battle of Lake Erie
@johnkilmartin5101
@johnkilmartin5101 3 роки тому
I'm kind of surprised Winfield Scott's capture at Queenston Heights wasn't mentioned.
@MrSeekerOfPeace
@MrSeekerOfPeace 3 роки тому
the battle of Queenston Heights was largely ignored even though it was Issac Brocks finest victory. This video has some minor inaccuracies however I'm not going to gripe about such a controversial and pointless war
@bradyelich2745
@bradyelich2745 3 роки тому
No mention of Tecumseh.
@fergusmallon1337
@fergusmallon1337 3 роки тому
A man oddly revered by Americans
@bradyelich2745
@bradyelich2745 3 роки тому
@@fergusmallon1337 Without Tecumseh, whom held a couple battlefields, there would be no Canada. Fact.
@bradyelich2745
@bradyelich2745 3 роки тому
@Wild Celtic-Saxon And a leader, with vision.
@tristan2203
@tristan2203 3 роки тому
@@bradyelich2745 And he got owned
@paranoidrodent
@paranoidrodent 3 роки тому
@@bradyelich2745 Back in my high school history classes in the 80s (in Quebec), my teacher spent a fair bit of time on Tecumseh along with the consequences of the War of 1812 both for Canada and for the indigenous people on both sides of the border. He made sure we knew Tecumseh was an important figure in our history. I think he was of the view that Brock got too much credit (not that he didn't deserve some, just that he got utterly lionized because he died in battle) and Tecumseh got overlooked far too much.
@mikecalif5553
@mikecalif5553 9 місяців тому
Note: the Republican party was founded in 1854 the Party mentioned in the video is the Democratic- Republican Party it is a completely different Party founded in 1792 and does not exist anymore.
@BA-gn3qb
@BA-gn3qb 2 роки тому
British soldier knocking on the door of the white house: "Hello Dolly?"
@UserName-om6ft
@UserName-om6ft Рік тому
@Johannes whos the whole world according to you? no one outside of the US, UK, and Canada know about the war of 1812 it was minor in comparison to the revolutionary war which Britain lost and the US won, and by the way nope the UK didnt win the war of 1812 either, even the great British Duke of Wellington Arthur Wellesley and later the official prime minister of the United Kingdom himself concluded that the war of 1812 was a draw (meaning not a British victory) and the peace negotiations should not make territorial demands and i quote: "I think you (Britain) has no right, from the state of war, to demand any concession of territory from America. [...] You have not been able to carry it into the enemy's territory, You cannot on any principle of equality in negotiation claim a cessation of territory except in exchange for other advantages which you have in your power. [...] Then if this reasoning be true, why stipulate for the uti possidetis? You can get no territory: indeed, the state of your military operations, does not entitle you to demand any." the fact that the Duke of Wellington himself concluded that the British did NOT win the war of 1812 then thats good enough for me, the UK did not win the war of 1812 its as simple as that
@inquisitorvarusnavary7126
@inquisitorvarusnavary7126 3 роки тому
Why not talking about the ''Bataille de la Châteauguay'' where 300 French-Canadian and 20 natives routed an army of 3000 U.S soldiers? It stop the U.S advance on Montreal and was a key event in the war?
@tesseract2365
@tesseract2365 2 роки тому
@Warlightor sour grapes
@cornishvyken6135
@cornishvyken6135 2 роки тому
Most battles were like that. E.g Chrysler farm saw 800 British, route an American army of 9,000
@heronimousbrapson863
@heronimousbrapson863 3 роки тому
The British burning of the White House was in retaliation for an American raid on York (now Toronto) the previous winter, in which US troops burned many buildings leaving many residents homeless to die of exposure.
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 3 роки тому
To be far the British did it first at Frenchtown in January of 1813 and in the Chesapeake. Just look up the story of Catherine”kitty” Knight.
@Unicysis
@Unicysis 2 місяці тому
Yet we have Yorks in the UK putting the kettle on 😂
@Mrgunsngear
@Mrgunsngear Рік тому
Thanks
@DOGO_youtube
@DOGO_youtube Рік тому
You are the best. Thank yyyyyyyyyyyyyooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!!
The War of 1812
1:53:17
Buffalo Toronto Public Media
Переглядів 9 млн
Why Do The British Look Down on Americans?
16:04
Nathaniel Drew
Переглядів 1,3 млн
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
EVA mash
Переглядів 6 млн
GADGETS VS HACKS || Random Useful Tools For your child #hacks #gadgets
00:35
Кровосток - разговор с легендами / вДудь
2:12:57
American Independence From the British Perspective | Animated History
21:40
The Armchair Historian
Переглядів 807 тис.
How did Germany plan to conquer Britain in WW2? - Operation SeaLion
15:16
How Did the Americans Turn the Tide Against the British?
25:31
Kings and Generals
Переглядів 265 тис.
The most important country you’ve never heard about
28:13
Johnny Harris
Переглядів 411 тис.
America's Wars 1754-1945: Animated Battle Map
58:13
American Battlefield Trust
Переглядів 1,3 млн
World War 1 (All Parts)
1:04:50
Epic History
Переглядів 11 млн
THE HISTORY OF CALIFORNIA - in 13 Minutes
13:24
Knowledgia
Переглядів 683 тис.
Why did the Protestant Reformation Happen?
11:59
Knowledgia
Переглядів 1,6 млн
The Mexican-American War - Explained in 16 minutes
16:43
Knowledgia
Переглядів 7 млн
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
EVA mash
Переглядів 6 млн