Did you look into the study made by the university of Alaska to begin with?

This is 100% bs, shame on you in a nice but bad try misleading the population. Said by a guy with a top Mensa IQ and Sir Isaac Newton agrees.

Looking forward to this as so many people use WTC 7 as "proof" of a conspiracy. I don't get it personally as a collapse of two 110 story buildings would compromise the structure of buildings near by from the vibrations alone and that's ignoring falling debris and fire.

I'd suggest everyone to unsubscribe until he looks at the study made by the University of Alaska. It seems like the guy behind Lesics has become desperate for clicks.

FAIL ... it was NOT an actual university study BY the university ... but instead a PRIVATE COMMISSION by the morons of Richard Gages wee fourteen year old online pretend petition that PAID an ALREADY believe to find what he was PAID to find.@@ziad_jkhan

Haven't watched the video yet i wonder what's the context of why a hulk is represented in a 9/11 video

Trying to appeal to a younger audience and make a joke out of it so they don't realise they're being brainwashed.

@@truesurrealist i think you re digging a little too deep with this

@@ButterDog42069 there’s only dust to dig through, created by controlled demolitions . End of story

@@Matt-pt6rl watch a lecture by Dr Judy Wood and ask yourself if it was controlled demolition was the rubble pile big enough? Or thought exercise: how could you rig a 110 storey 1million ton building for demolition without a massive civil engineering undertaking that thousands would remember? Use your brains guys

will they dare?

You sound open minded

All those buildings were controlled Demolitions ! Done by you know who !

he should do a video on tower 5 how the center of the building was hallowed out but remained standing...

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/soKhd62CiaR9koE.htmlsi=VbgSC6B7oi-0ZPSS

And is just as much of a fictional cartoon as the entire video is! What a complete pile of BS- LIES LIES LIES!!!

These graphics suck lol

Swear it’s a total war animation as well

George Bush shouldn't have made the Hulk mad.

If you can acknowledge that trivializing one of the most important events in history is at best naive, that would be good for you. Do some research. Start with terms like building 7, thermite, Larry Silverstein, and NORAD.

Everyone talking about fake plants 🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🫡🫡🫡

Okay. A LOT of work went into making this video talking about pure, unbelievable bullsh*t. Happy? Where did all the debris go? Did it melt into the earth?

​@@jpeterson1488 yes.

@@jpeterson1488 you gave them the recognition they deserve!

Nutters hate facts.

So crazy... the videos of the towers falling AT FREE FALL RATE, building 7, prove that were brought down with controlled explosions yet people just blindly believe what their told. Even the builders of the towers even said the buildings were designed to withstand 100 planes flying into them - what a world we live in...

No wonder why you started your life as a scientist and currently are a Uber driver 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Where did you get "current" from that sentence?@@Cailo4

@@Cailo4 🤣😆

And let me guess, you have 41 years of experience

Well stated and on point. Ppl still believe it was the planes, and according to majority of the know it alls I seen, was that supposedly a part of one of the towers fell onto building seven (even this CGI shows how the towers fell). It does not add up at all.

Debris from the WTC1 and WTC2 collapses damaged the buildings around them, including WTC7, and started major fires which were left to burn for seven hours. The heat weakened internal core steel columns in one part of the building failed vertically. And then the now unsupported adjacent columns failed laterally. The debris from the steel frame collapsing pierced the now freestanding outer shell near the base and it finally collapsed.

😂👏

ALL the columns in bldg 7 collapsed at the same time, not just the few which were hot from a fire. The columns which fireman were standing right next to just 5 minutes earlier were not surrounded by flames.

@@martoto77 LMAO🤣🤣🤣

‼️🪴🪴FAKE PLANT ALERT‼️‼️🪴🪴

What does fake plant alert mean?

@BenMosesGames I share in your skepticism

Benmoses, it’s called the nutter conundrum.

@@dikranovichk5889DIGGLER PLEASE ‼️‼️‼️

The planes engines blew through the towers. Heavy components took out or distorted many core columns, the others descended by being dragged down by the external walls _through_ the top hat truss. It was my first thought too - but I am an engineer . . . and thought again.

I did not expect that Gmod💩! 😏

Certainly “seems” logical. Yet the inconvenient truth remains. Never forget even the experienced news casters that day said the phrase “controlled demoIition”

The steel core remained for a few minutes before also giving out, likely from joints no longer being within tolerance and also falling like a house of cards. You can see it happen in real time with the NBC coverage of the collapse. Once the smoke clears a little bit, you can clearly see the cores failure.

@@CoercedJab what a difference the words *_like a_* make when omitted . . . 😎

I’m so sorry to hear of your loss. I visited NY for the first time this summer and saw the WTC memorial. It was nice how they did it and of course has all the names of those who were lost. her memory will live on. Stay safe

I’m sorry to hear of your loss. I hope there’s a real investigation because of people just like your granddaughter. This video is a lie and a slap in the face to her, you and all of us who really care about what happened that day. People need to hear the real truth before it’s lost in history and forever a lie.

@@NickkaDUB dude you have no humanity in you right? They are sharing their experience about how they lost a relative, which is very tragic, and you're here just spewing your conspiracy theory? Shame on you. Also, saying "no uh, this is a lie!" after the video shows and demonstrates with ALOT of evidence how the tower may have collapsed, just shows how purposely ignorant you are.

I'm so deeply sorry for your loss of your granddaughter. Kind regards from Copenhagen, Denmark.

I hope the collapse of te towers didnt collapse your heart. R.I.P.

🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴

@@Matt-pt6rl You already said that, oh, your "supervisors" are REALLY mad at you, huh?

@@mooneyes2k478🪴🪴🪴🍕

open air designs turned out to be more uncomfortable in an office environment one look in the wrong direction and suddenly your presence in the room becomes very awkward this incentivizes workers to keep their eyes glued to the screen and use privacy filters on their monitors

I am amazed how few people seem to have noticed it

@@WildMatsu the live footage shows shattered steel beams being jettisoned away from the towers as they explode into dust as they fall during the demolitions on 9/11 . This video doesn’t explain this phenomenon

@@Matt-pt6rl Did the steel beams sound like Destruction_Metal_Pole_L_Wave_2_0_0.wav when they hit the ground?

@@WildMatsu I’m half deaf so I only noticed that steel beams had been reduced to stick sized pieces as they flew into the air . The pulverizing concrete had created such a wave of dust as the towers fell that it almost hid the steel fragments shooting sideways from the collapse

Getting seventy likes for such a useless comment is crazy fake. Nice avatar. I have one just like it on FB.(A jet couldn't demolish a wrecking ball.)

Absolutely true, so there will be more death people in the near future linked with this disaster than actually on paper

Most of the fire retardant spray on material is asbestos material. I’m not sure if it’s still in use today but it’s literally everywhere and not just spray foam insulation but loads of other materials as well.

Yup, they were told they had to update the buildings prior to 9/11. The cost was estimated at morethan the two towers' value. The owner made around 4 billion in insurance when they fell as well.

You are incorrect. Only the North Tower had any asbestos in it at all and only below the 40th floor. The SFRM used in the rest of the North Tower and ALL of the South Tower contained no asbestos material. Plenty of toxins floating around that site. Why people have to just jump to assumptions about asbestos and ignore true and relevant facts boggles my mind.

The construction companies that built the towers was owned by the Italian mafia they pocketed the money that the building developers gave to them and brought CHEAP METAL NOT STEAL !!!!….

The video does, but not very well since it is both obvious and not that important. Pay special attention at #10. 1. Plane hits building causing massive structural damage. The plane is completely destroyed in a fraction of a second, but this in no way implies no damage to the building. Large fires break out across multiple floors simultaneously with no fire fighting or fire suppression in an unprecedented fire event. 2. What happens to steel when you heat it? The steel gets softer. The longer you heat it and the hotter it gets the steel starts to _bend_ 3. Bent steel is not as strong as straight steel. 4. The steel floor trusses start to bend (sag) from the heat and the weight of the concrete floors, furniture and equipment. 5. Sagging floor trusses pull some of the surviving perimeter (outside) columns inward, causing them to bow by up to five feet. 6. Bent steel is not as strong as straight steel. 7. The perimeter columns bend until they buckle (best seen in the Gary Pollard video of the South Tower collapse linked in the description above). 8. Columns - which carry ALL of the gravity loads - above and below the failure point are *no longer aligned* 9. The falling upper mass drops _past the columns_ below, NOT onto them. THIS BIT IS IMPORTANT!!! 10. Tens of thousands of tons of debris falls _down_ through the open office space *within the four outer walls* . As that debris hits the next floor, that floor fails when the pair of bolts connecting each truss to the core and perimeter columns shear off. The debris then falls the next 12 feet with the mass of the newly failed floor added to it and hits the next floor, which fails. Rinse and repeat x90. This proceeds through all the floors one by one until the floors are all gone. 11. Rate of collapse increases as the collapse progresses. The collapse accelerates from zero, slows only very slightly with the first impact, speeds up again (this time not from a starting point of zero) and as the momentum and mass increases, the slow down with each impact decreases. There was exactly as much resistance as there should have been. _average_ rate of collapse for this stage was 0.65 of GA. 12. The perimeter columns, no longer attached to the rest of the building and thus lacking critical lateral support fall away - peel. 13. The central core columns, damaged by the falling debris and with no lateral support from the perimeter columns fall last. 14. The Twin Towers were an integrated structure. None of the three major components - core system, perimeter columns and long-span floor truss systems - could survive without the others.

Yea... he also conveniently left out the fact both buildings had 2 reinforcement sections that were there specifically for this purpose. Look at pictures when the towers were standing and you can see where they were

He does at 9:58 he said the floors above the damaged area weighed as much as the titanic. The only problem is in the animation after it looks like the building is collapsing from ground level when in reality it collapsed from the top down.

My dad worked across the street delivering to WTC1 and WTC2 frequently, he quit 6 months before the towers collapsed. I was 5

Having survived 9/11 only because of a layoff… wow, I would imagine that was probably life-changing for you! I never worked in the towers but whenever I was on foot in the city, I would stop to look up at the tops of them. Even from a block away, I would have to bend my neck and arch my back to the point that it felt as if I were looking up at something BEHIND me in the sky!

How do you know somebody worked in the WTC buildings? Don’t worry they’ll tell you.

Unless, you know.

@TheNJDirector I don't know you but I'm glad to be able to read your comment. Thank God you made it. Go have a amazing year(s).

Fire will do that…

@@catfishcave379No it won’t.

@@johnbruce4003 So Sorry, it was Col Mustard in the conservatory with building demolition caps. I was stupid to believe all the footage of the roaring fires and several partial collapses. When facts get in the way - go conspiracy!

​@@catfishcave379fire makes controlled free fall demolition? No need for explosions then?

@@pse2020 Bingo! Spot on... fire can't create a free fall collapse of that building. To those who doubt: then why did the construction crane NOT melt, that was closer to the Towers than Bldg 7? Yet B7 collapses?? We need an explanation that includes the obvious use of demolitions. You are spot on.

Why would you think that...the accent?

@@BonsaiBurner ????

You are the fakest plant ‼️‼️‼️🪴🪴🪴🪴out there

So Leslie Robertson is a lair?

No they were not! No civilian building in the world is or can be made to withstand being hit by a 130 ton airliner moving at mach 0.5

Did you notice that he is wielding a scimitar. It was the curved sword used by arabs during warfare.

@@AlbanSombreval8686💀

@@AlbanSombreval8686

*Evil Tobey McGuire music*

I didnt even notice that the first time I saw it and now I cant stop laughing

same bro

What? 91 years of being a structural engineer in college? You’re like 110 and never graduated?

See people, _that_ is how you troll.

how much did the tower weigh and the jet.. concrete. how can an alluminum balloon jet destroy iron steel and concrete the heat energy from the jet fuel can be measured in the external fireball image. that fact then determines the heat energy within the building u explain that the material within the building was fuel to expand the fire damage melting at some point all the heat energy was absorbed from then un burned frame.. same effect at the pentagon why no destruction there? next time your got nothing to do look at an image of the pentagon and a ukraiin missel striking a building.. the lies shankswberg pa no piece of anything look at images of plane crashes there is stuff everywhere no cameras laughable

@@cmike956 - Never heard of punctuation or sentence structure, eh?

공격자들은 타워에 들어갈 수 있는 가장 큰 비행기를 고속으로 추락시켰습니다. 그 이후에 일어난 일은 그 이후에 일어났습니다.

​@@UKpostsSucks_1

​@@UKpostsSucks_1Why don't you translate your "expert" explanations of the collapse of the tierrsc& wtc7. I'm sure the OP would appreciate you going to such effort to give them a good laugh.

@@shillhunter4380

🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴‼️‼️

Yep. You and I must be masochists cause I’ve been watching 9/11 documentaries all day.

You don’t think because you didn’t watch . Your pain is as nonsensical as your comment

@@Matt-pt6rl ??????

@@ref8632 watch the demolitions if you’ve got ?????

@@Matt-pt6rl if it was a demolition or not doesn't have anything to do with feeling disturbed by the tragedy of the people that died.

Lmao hulk 2003

Gee, so happy I had a cartoon character demonstrate that for me.

Seems more credible than the explanation in this video.

​@@sulandelemere Pffft!!! Facts don't matter, eh?

More believable than the official narrative tbh

Thats because he was not contacted/funded by the feds so he was free to use his brain.

Really? Apparently your professor never heard of progressive collapse or maybe he made his misinformed comments before seeing videos that clearly show the floors pancaking into the basement.

@@marcpowell5893 Watch the actual video. The building collapses from the bottom, not the top. The top of the building in intact until it hits the ground. debunking the pancake theory.

@@marcpowell5893 And the buildings were designed to withstand an impact of an airliner.

@@scottcraig2569 The graphics in this video are flakey but the theory it mentions is fairly accurate. After collapse initiation, the connections of the floors to the columns progressively failed resulting in the floors pancaking. That is what caused the sequential dust and debris ejections from windows seen in multiple videos. Claims by designers that the buildings could withstand aircraft impacts without severe damage were merely engineering hubris. The buildings obviously could not.

A highly ranked funded comment praising this propaganda piece. Nice.

Detailed? Steel buildings don't collapse onto themselves like a house for cards.

😮​@@WillConley

@@Riley_rolo This pice of shite showed it colapsing from the bottom at ground level, they are trying to re write the event

@@EssentialComment notice the OP never responded? This comment section is a greenhouse of fake plants! 🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴, don’t waste a keystroke on it . Buildings don’t turn into dust midair and debris piles aren’t 99%dust from building collapses.

I'm not sure I would agree with that.

Thought it was 5 dancing Israelis

@@HK00088dog whistle

Jesus had Moses raise his staff and poof. Jonah tried warning everyone before hand, but nobody listened.

well eyewitnesses of Jehovah say it was Godzilla

@@kendexter Godzilla is REAL unlike god

🤣🤣

godzilla is kind ! ... (but the vast majority of muslims are kind too, maybe that was your point.)

Godzilla would definitely be more plausible than this theory.

@@patheticmediastudios8868lol the whole US airforce couldn't knock them buildings down. So they called Luke Skywalker out 😂🤣😂🤣

Can you see where @johnkoutsantonis7187 is using sarcasm here

damn why didnt u born before bro

So this is all your fault. You got blood on your hands

So you’re responsible for 9/11

You seem quite the discerner of truth...how about the message does that matter or the facts?

Know that the whole tower turned to dust. Not only the asbestos.

Why were the towers dustified on the way down instead of instead of in giant floor sections and walls like a normal pancaking collapse? Why did everyone in the lobby and basement report bombs having gone off prior to the planes hitting?

@@Turdfergusen382 Yeah, especially the core, just one tube standing there? ...

There were 100,000 tons of steel in each tower. Even without the insulation how hot could the core columns get in two hours? Where is the data on the tons of steel and tons of concrete on each level? Including the 6 basement levels.

@@psikeyhackr6914 Well I’m not sure how…. But somehow hot enough to be molten metal in a pile at the bottom for three months after even though they were spraying water on it constantly….

and why the boss had an appointment at that day and why was there a new ensurance for a asbestos soaked building?

See, this is what totally made me realize that it was planned. You're telling me, a giant skyscraper, which burned for about 7 hours, just collapses? There wasn't even smoke or anything like that billowing out, and the skyscraper that caught fire in Hong Kong, didn't collapse despite it burning for 9 hours, and it was a lot less wider than WTC 7, which other buildings around did catch some fire, but were okay. Can't make this nonsense up, two trillion dissapeared on the same day as well? Yeah, what a conspiracy, the government would never do anything wrong to the people.

@@SquidCena where are the turbines? Where is any debris at the Pentagon?

Finally someone else asked this question besides me.

Lesics is doing a video on WTC 7 next. (Spoiler alert: It collapsed due to fire.)

Fake comment by Fitz

@@Matt-pt6rl Stupid comment by you.

@@mooneyes2k478at least I never accused the FDNY of complicity in Silverstein’s DemolitionDerby on 9/11

@@Matt-pt6rl Incidentally, repeating the same stupid shit in multiple places doesn't make it any less stupid, you are aware of this, right?

@@mooneyes2k478your thousands of replies proves your point!!

That was not the purpose of that demonstration. FFS 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

​@@UKpostsSucks_1

‼️🪴‼️FAKE PLANT ALERT

That wasn't the point of that demonstration. To be clear, I know the official report is not an adequate explanation and that there are multiple weird falsehoods in the official story, so I'm not criticizing you for the implication of a conspiracy, I'm criticizing you for being dumb.

@@levicraig6016 - Please list the alleged _multiple weird falsehoods in the official story_ and explain why _the official story_ (by which I presume you mean The NIST Twin Towers Building Performance Report) is _not an adequate explanation_ given its mandate. I won't wait up,

My condolences on your loss.

@@mooneyes2k478 thank you! It was hell watching him go through 2 rounds of chemo/radiation and 2 surgeries, only to see it destroy his immune system and keep coming back. He's not in pain anymore, but he had to be in constant pain in order to be free of it.

@@bronwentillman8385 Cancer is the modern plague, and it crushes not only the victim but those around them.

Death is a temporary state: Job:14:12-15: So man lieth down, and riseth not: till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep. O that thou wouldest hide me in the grave, that thou wouldest keep me secret, until thy wrath be past, that thou wouldest appoint me a set time, and remember me! If a man die, shall he live again? all the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come. Thou shalt call, and I will answer thee: thou wilt have a desire to the work of thine hands. Ec:3:20: All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again. Ec:12:7: Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it. Ec:9:10: Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest. This vid is one of the first ones to start linking companies that were in the WTC: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/hYOqenpsaKx_wGg.html&pp=ygUUd2hvIHNob3Qgam9obiBvJ25laWw%3D WKJO: Who Killed John O'Neill?

😓

I was looking for this

😂😂

Sounded like it was in French

Ik

@@kimmys2982me too

There are fan made pics of a giant Hulk Hogan destroying the WTC on 9/11 floating around online. Google it, it's the strangest thing!

This is because this whole thing is fake. There were 100s of reasons exposing the whole thing as a lie. What crashed into the towers was not the passenger jets. If you dig in you find reason after reason after reason the official story was a fake. Perhaps the easiest to listen to was the air hostess who deduced from the clues given what actually did happen to the passengers and where they were taken.

And IRL too. Even the tips of the wings were able to slice through structural steel, if you like lesics, believe the official story.

@@JohnSmith-pn1vv the 9/11 conspiracy theory is the most cringe thing to ever happen...

@@edofluit6568 12 seconds means free fall speed which is impossible for a structure. Clearly the building did not fall, no debris on the ground. We can see that it actually turned to dust starting at the top.

You have to be fully retarded to believe the narrative of Building 7 and the pentagon strike narrative… every single physics/structural engineering model shows that the only way building 7 collapsed was by the simultaneous failure of all the supports, and multiple witnesses reported hearing a sequence of explosions. If you believe the “non-conspiracy” explanation of building 7 then YOU are the actual conspiracy theorist man.

Yeah.... that wouldn't make any sense.

@@TheMiddleClassholes ‼️🪴‼️🪴‼️🪴 FAKE PLANT ALERT ‼️

I noticed that too. Very strange.

Nano Thermite

@@feralzi8930 did you watch the video

It looks like they didnt actually animate a collapse they just made the model move down and have ruble move upwards from the ground

@@vuurkip2491 i did watch the video but but you know what's very strange is that the towers were engineered so that it can withstand a 707 crash. You think fuel from 707 coming from the middle east will have a tank full of fuel? Most of the fire exits through the hole the plane makes and some of the fuel can spill out. So it's dumb and illogical to say that just plane fuel can collapse a building after 1 hour of the towers withstanding it. There is definitely external interference occuring that cause the building to basically freefall

My observations as well.

Yeah.. It's hard to animate the steel core failing for no reason. :) Lets just sink it all into the ground.. nailed it

This is completely inaccurate. This video is actively engaging in the Terr orism.

Exactly, none of the animations match reality.

Naysayers refuse to acknowledge that fact the the interior of the structure was moving and collapsing at a different rate than the exterior exoskeleton. Because of this oversight, conspiracy theories abound by feeble and shallow minds and will continue to do so in perpetuity.

Exactly, it is an explination on what happened that will be seen for ever on YT and it shows the buildings cloapsing from the bottom at ground level

@@EssentialComment the only video worse than this is the cowardly blacksmith who allows comments on every video he makes except for his shameless shill for the farcical collapse narrative

@@EssentialComment Every bit of footage that day shows skyscrapers turning into dust midair. Lesics neglects the fact that almost none of the thousands of victim’s bodies were recovered from the “collapse “ . Bodies don’t disappear from building collapses

@@EssentialComment it’s a story about building collapses but the main characters are missing . Thousands died but no bodies were recovered from the debris

Two things were missing from the debris pile ; 90% of the victims and 90% of the skyscrapers. These baffling figures have never been addressed by any state/ federal agency or news outlet in over twenty years !!!

Fight, flight, freeze, and fawn... the four categories of fear response. I personally fall in the freeze type, unfortunately

@@mikero6225DIGGLER PLEASE ‼️‼️‼️

Joan you seem to be more of a fake plant 🪴 than a physics student

you can blame your own government - RIP

thank you Silverstein jew phuck and thank you Bush... deep state keeps effing us over. buckle up for more

@@vaughnmcintire4015 > *"you can blame your own government"* You mean for not identifing the terrorists before they committed the 9/11 terrorist attack?

@@BullToTheShit no, he means blaming cia for sponsoring terrorists.

@@BullToTheShit I talked to civilian pilots - they all said that such a maneuver is very complicated - the probability that they would hit the center of the building with their plane - is very small. Everyone claims that the pilots were incredibly skilled - where did the terrorists train the pilots, and on what planes ?

That's some deep meme knowledge and pattern recognition.

@@Materialisimo DUDE THERE IS NO WAY TH ACTUAL MATERIALISIMO REPLIED, DUDE YOURE MY IDOL

@@Materialisimo I remember watching your MLG edits on my grandpa's Sony VAIO 2009 PC with windows XP as a kid, simpler times :'D

@@Materialisimooh my god there is no way (you posted some of the best videos ever)

one of the most tragic events in american history, not human history ;)

On what basis?

@@dirkdiggler8260Because the voices in his head told him so...

you were high? you so edgy bruh.

@@tobyroyson9336 shut your corny ass up talkin bout edgy 😂😂 what is this 2015

I believe he meant fly them into buildings on purpose like gigantic cruise missiles. The engineers were thinking more along the lines of an accident.

@@lurch789I’d rather have to Bush’s than the tard we have now

It was assumed until that day that when terrorists hijack a plane, they do it to use the passengers as bargaining leverage - they want something and will trade passengers to get it. That is why the standard procedure for passengers was to not try to fight the hijackers: you are worth more to the hijacker alive than dead, unless you start to cause problems for them. So what was not imagined was terrorists hijacking a plane not to get the passengers but to get the plane itself. This is why the 9/11 terrorists chose flights that typically had low passenger volumes. As soon as the passengers on United Flight 93 found out that they were not being taken hostage, but that the terrorists were going to kill everyone, the calculus changed and they heroically fought back. They gave their lives to save those at whatever the fourth target was. We all know now that if we are on a plane that someone tries to hijack, we all get out of our seats and overwhelm the hijackers with superior numbers.

@@Murph_gaming They defiantly had terrorism concerns at the time of construction. That still doesn't mean they thought it would happen.

Well presidents don't always know history very well. Remember our current president said cannons were illegal when the 2a was written, which is wrong cannons always and still are legal. They are just elected officials and not always the smartest people.

Santa is more believable...

Clear and informative cartoon?

@@malachi- It was an animation illustrating what happened, not a cartoon!

@@ThomasDanielsen1000 Why are you so defensive... hmmm....

@@malachi- Well what do you think? Probably because I'm paid by the CIA...

Very clear and informative? it shows them colapsing from the bottom at ground level, this shite will be allowed to stay up for ever by the powers that be and it is not even correct

He's a bastid

Shhhhhh.... you'll wake the sheep.

Because two entire towers fell onto it? And the jet fuel didn't melt the beams, but the beams still became more malleable by the heat. Metal doesn't just instantly transform from cold to melted, it slowly weakens. The beams got hot and became easier to bend, which allowed the weight of the building and the plane to put enough pressure on them for them to snap.

Bingo! I bet you he doesn't have an answer.

Anybody who passed grade school physics classes has the answer.@@rickyt11

It was loaded with backup diesel generators. Once WTC 7 was hit by the collapse, a fire started and spread to the fuel storages.

Like when Bugs Bunny survived that plane crash by jumping out before it hit the ground.

A fake plant is sad to watch🪴‼️but DIGGLER PLEASE ‼️‼️‼️‼️

Suicide not allowed

Wrong, I remember seeing a complete explanation of how it happened from engineers a year or so after it happened. Not sure if it was on the Science Channel or Discovery Channel. Pretty much every explanation in this video was the same as the the one that I watched back then.

@@MrMADMILO69 It was in 2006. A NOVA presentation on PBS.

🤣@@Ed_Stuckey

@@baird5776mullet I made no comment on the veracity, only the source.

Explain the 52 story build that free fell with no plane hitting it or jet fuel?

What the hell does that even mean-@@hiddenintheshadows530

​@@hiddenintheshadows530Your comment had no correlation to his comment. Typical.

Even more genius: alu plane crashing steel columns.

​@hiddenintheshadows530 The fuck you mean? There are literally photos of wtc7 on fire, and also why comment here, there's other videos that you can spread your message.

😂AND you reference a video showing the Hulk, making up BS COKE experiment and ignores ALL SCIENCE

the vast majority of architectural engineers disagree with this explanation...and I disagree any explanation void of the word "thermite" given that it was all over the debris they dumped in the ocean asap...and then there's building 7

@@nunyabizzness8- The first part absolutely not true. Just the opposite in fact. The second part almost certainly true insofar as your affinity for thermite, but not something I personally would brag about.

@@UKpostsSucks_1 Google "Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC"

@@UKpostsSucks_1 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Indeed so. Another consideration is that the 767 is very similar in both size and weight to the largest of the Boeing 707's - the intercontinental version. In fact, at the fuel loads of the two airplanes that hit the WTC, their weight would have been around the same as, or a bit less than, that of a fully loaded 707. Although the 767 is a twin aisle airplane, and thus has a slightly wider fuselage, it is fairly close to the overall size of the 707 dimensionally. So the testing done during the development of the WTC was not as far off the mark as many may think.

@@anthonyvallillo422 theyre not the same planes.

Of course. My point is that they are very close in size and weight.

But yet the engine that landed on Murray st. Was not from a 767 😂

@@thatonesnowboarde and you cannout get any of those videos anymore, they have all been erased, you know the ones

Whoooooops! That's an uncomfortable topic

_"Would love to hear how the wings and engines magically evaporated without a trace or leave any mark on the building "_ You can see damage and walls blown in to the left and right of the fuselage hole. Look at some photos.

Cruise missile I have the footage

Or even better - if the temps were high enough to evaporate titanium and steel (approx 4000 degrees), how did they get DNA samples identifying the passengers (which evaporate at 500 degrees) ??

or : why do all conspiracy theorists use the same picture while there are quite a few showing the trace was actually big, like the size of a plane !

What the f... are you talking about?

@@ThomasDanielsen1000 watch the video, around the 10min mark he says the weight of the building kept increasing as it collapsed.

@@J.T.19134 That's the weight of the COLLAPSING PART of the tower that increases!! God, is it so hard to grasp???

the buildings didn't get heavier as they collapsed. Wtf are you going on about?

OK, so misunderstood. Didn't know there was so many engineers on UKposts. Still doesn't make sense, IMO. If the top 15 floors collapsed, causing catastrophic damage to the floor below, OK, but thats 1 floor, even say 5 floors. If the trusses where compromised by the plain, then the fire, heat rises, so what exactly made the bottom half not hold up, youse are saying the weight along of each floor collapsed the next??

Your mother and I are going out to dinner soon, want me to bring you some chicken nuggets?

​@@SeltkirkTVthat's an AI good luck banging the motherboard 😂

@@SeltkirkTV lmao what

Haha same, wont lie I came to see the comments too

Just one passport, found blocks away on the street along with thousands of other items that had been blown out of the North Tower _during the impact_ of Flight 11 - such as Lisa Frost's Air Miles card. Odd how no one ever brings that up.

Obviously planted.. they couldn’t even find the black boxes

​@@UKpostsSucks_1😂

@@rikomanaro It's amazing what you can find, when you're "specifically" looking for it.

Such believable evidence of ...well you know.

😂😂😂

@@mcmandy086 la vanalidad siempre asomando sus narices!

.....es war King King ,sorry ****🎉❤🎉

​@@Kapuzinerkressesuicide not allowed

​@@mcmandy086suicide not allowed

[rest of my comment]: Nice gaslighting!

its made of aluminum for all the dis believers out there

Exactly lightweight rigid aluminium firm ridged perfect for fly but on impact to mega thick steel columns it would just crumple how did the huge steels collapse faster than a pool ball falling it just doesn't make sense how a demolition expert can say it was a perfect demolition all on its own

That one stayed intact. The one in Pennsylvania and the one in DC vaporized. Hmmm.

Yeah, this vid is BS. Too many things signifies so.

That's impressive, considering there was no such thing as a 747 when the towers were built. Not to mention, of course, that no-one has ever, before or after, "specifically designed" for anything of the sort.

No it was not designed to handle a 747. How do you even design a skyscraper to "handle a 747"??? Why do you twoofers lie constantly?

I'd like to see you explain your comment. Why do you think a plane cannot fly close to the ground....you suggesting they don't take off or land? No money was missing but go ahead and try and logically explain that theory. Explain how the largest robbery in world history took place and not a single person gives a $hit and looking for the money? Explain why a plane would be needed to cover it up?

2.3 trillion.

@@Shamino1 and now they've 'lost' another 4.6 trillion. The military has the worst accountants

the 2.3 trillion announced missing the day before 9/11

we are just conspiracy theorist...even if there was 80% of the plane missing. also jet fuel just this time melted steel beams...

It's easier to sell a conspiracy theory than it is to teach science to an American...

if you think that the WTC were brought down by anything other than the planes, heat, physics, you need to go to school

What do you mean by that with regards to this video??

@@radeonblue1816 What do you mean "What do you mean"?

It was carried out for Many Reasons.

Interesting observation: It took hours for people to move between the same locations that took seconds for some inert object to move through itself, even though the force created by an accelerated mass is only applicable between locations (MxA=F); because the path of greatest resistance is always through oneself, whether it's as poorly constructed as a pillar of cigarette ash or as strongly constructed as a wrecking ball.

Fake plants 🪴🪴comment and reply

“Never trust the fake plant 🪴” is what the firefighters say

@@liarfire101 Ohh ffs, so now it's suspicious that a building collapses faster than people can evacuate a building? Just when you thought twoofers couldn't get any dumber...

@@ThomasDanielsen1000 *Just when you thought twoofers couldn't get any dumber* 👍

Damn Elsagate infiltrating them education videos!

💀💀💀💀

It’s about as realistic as the towers collapsing due to a “controlled demolition” as some weirdos like to believe.

@@MrSoccerball100 “EX PLOS IVE EVI DENCE: “EX PERTS SP EAK OUT”. Then let’s talk.

​@MrSoccerball100 you are saying that thousands of building engineers with decades of experience in their field are weirdos? They signed letter with thousands of signatures stating that official report is simply a lie. Aluminum plain can't make holes in steel like that and jet fuel can't do what they say. Put patriotism aside and use just your brain. How the h... did wtc 7 collapsed???? Same as both towers?? Wasn't hit by plain ,Wasn't splashed with furl and still managed to go down in free fall,pancake in 4 seconds..common man😂😂

💀

💀

thats what happened

Fake how about this inside job.what he is talking about 😂

@@iraqiactor1 hahaha - i was gonna make a joke about that 🤣

How do you engineer collapse mechanisms into a structure without using explosives and incendiaries, or hydraulics and springs? I'm developing a self-crushing beer can and could use some help.

Average metal pipe 219x6 enjoyer

🗿

🗿

🗿

🗿

3 months later.

@@fknbastages Right? Thermite because it was an inside job. Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth has lots of info and experts thag agree

Thermite. No planes caused the collapse of the towers, it was a controlled demolition

Something melted the steel without heat which is why it's stayed molten.

@@wayland7150 something wouldn't be thermite as that would make me conspiracy theorist, antivaxer, flat earther, Trump supporter, Putin lover, Palestine apologist etc.

So Leslie Robertson didn't design for a 767 to fly into the buildings at 500mph. You're saying the man is a failure?

Bro, the buildings were designed fine and it was impressive they lasted how long they did. No architect or engineer designs a building to withstand an airplane crash.

The animations and statements are unfactual in several cases does that matter at all? Or what makes all the sense to you?

@@spookedspooks Better to remain silent than remove all doubt....bro.

@@BonsaiBurner what are you even saying)

the one that left a 16ft hole before the roof collapsed?

@@10percent4DaBigGuyThe pentagon has the most cameras on a building in the world. Proof it and release the images. They won’t, because you know why…

That was a missile

The shame of this video! So insulting

A missile flew over DC? Nobody saw it? You are aware, like the busiest hwy on the east coast goes right past the pentagon?

Is there much to explain?

@@Olliekay lookup “EX PLO SIVE EVI DENCE: EX PERTS SPEAK OUT” may have to switch to search by rating

I guess? there's not much mystery or confusion around that collapse right?@@intyrnet

@@Olliekay The mystery already starts with the flight controller who was responsible for looking at the radar: he said that it is impossible for a passenger plane to fly in such a small curve so near to the ground. And the mystery ends with the rubble photos showing an engine that does not belong to a passenger plane but a small old fighter aircraft

so whats the theory? there was no jet? thats such a horrid thing to say considering all the people who died on it @@jdd818

how many where in the car?

You think the kennedy assassination theories are equivalent to flat earth logic? That is a ridiculous statement on face considering the litany of credentialed opinions on the towers and Kennedy assassination that would never exist in the flat earth cosmos - this comment speaks to your ignorance on all matters it seems.

@@WHATISTRUTHTVTrue.

a LOT more to the kill count if it fell sideways...

​@WHATISTRUTHTV They wanted to hurt New York, Not cripple it. Would have ruined the financial centers falling through through the city

There is no convincing explaining of how they went down just like a planned destruction. And thats both of them

@@WHATISTRUTHTV Anybody with the word 'truth' in their username ironically seem to have zero concern for truth, only conspiracy. Why is that? The terrorists never thought the towers would fall so what do you mean, fell as planned? Are you one of these crackpots who thinks this was a controlled demolition against the word of literally every demolition expert on the planet? Lol, but you guys know better 😉👍🏽

searching for comments about the witnesses who said they heard explosions, including fire dept. and even trump lol

could be either people hitting the ground or debris hitting the ground@@HK00088

Fake News. I witness this as it happened and the firemen said it came down like a demolition. Firemen for 911 Truth told the real story.

Structural engineer Leslie Robertson designed the World Trade Center complex, which was completed in 1973, to withstand the impact of an airplane. In his calculations, he used a Boeing 707, the largest aircraft in service at the time, but smaller and lighter than the Boeing 767 models that struck the towers in 2001. Explain how an aluminum plane can take down steel frame buildings when the flames were not burning from floor to floor as you depict. In fact people were coming down the stairs and the fireman who called 911 said there were only pockets of fire and to send up some hose to put it out. Let's not forget the firemen on the ground said they heard explosions going off at the bottom of the tower like bombs. Google has been scrubbing a lot of these old videos and changing the resolution quality to hide the truth. In addition, the news media refused to show the public the collapse of WTC7. The head executives made a decision not to show it. So to this day, many don't even realized 3 buildings collapsed in free fall that day not 2.

​@@HK00088 explosions, detonations, sabotage not necessary. The planes merely hitting the towers would've caused the USA to go to war, no need for them to fall.

Well you certainly aren't a genius if you think that anonymous UKposts posters have been endowed with unique truth-detecting abilities, and that the worldwide community of scientists and engineers are blithering idiots. Or that the government would knowingly embrace false physics. No, that is not the stuff of genius.

You're just trying to take suspicion off yourself. That's right Warken7284. I know where you were on that September morning. I know what you did.

True. You have to be a moron to "see" that.

Damaged by the two towers that collapsed.

@@EchoAccord Where and how?

@@EchoAccord It was damaged on the roof, yet collapsed from the bottom. Try and 'logic' your way out of that.

@@redpillaware5101 Have you ever wondered why buildings beneath the world trade centers were destroyed after the collapse?

Climate change

The science behind it was a need for the perps to have a building for you to look at so you'd believe the controlled demolition explanation...

That is the key to the whole thing.

Im not a 9/11 expert but I remember hearing the entire fire suppression system was down due to the collapse of the towers disrupting underground watermains. Fires burned for over 7 hours so its shouldnt be unfathomable that a collapse would occur. Ill never understand why people will deny the "possibly" of this let alone the high probability of this being the case.

7 was heavily damaged from towers collapsing followed by 7 hours of uncontrolled fire (the fire suppression systems went down)- basically the same thing that happened to the towers , structural damage then fire weakening the steal structure leading to a internal cascading collapse. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/iHuQnXiQiqd21Jc.html

@@nortavon The mainstream narrative and the collective Consciousness that's been manipulated states that without the jet fuel the the powers would not have collapsed