Fix climate change before exploring space.

@@ncard00 the technology developed helps fight climate change.

Whiney, mindless narrator ruins this video.

🎉 you da best

A like well deserved.

3:45 Peggy Guirgis legs tf wrong with you dude?

Improve infrastructure and economic growth? Highspeed bullet trains and maglev super train technology, the new american dream....

xD, When do you think there will be a highspeed rail from Washington to New York? 2050??? @@carlsmith5545

NO, BRING BACK THE LOW TRUMP TAX CUTS WE HAD---THAT WAS THE BEST ECONOMY EVER IN THE USA...WAKE UP...FORSAKE NASA AND THE BILLIONAIRES CLUB...NASA IS A SUBSIDIARY OF THE ARMS MANUFACTURERS LIKE LOCKHEED MARTIN, NORTHROP GRUMMAN, BOEING, BAE ETC

The company Vast is aiming to do that.

For a short time, Gemini 11 had artificial gravity with a tether.

​@@carcinogen60yearsagoF**k Gemini 11

check out Vast

Outer Space doesn't exist.Earth is the only World there is.There are no other Physical Cosmic Worlds out there and there is no Infinite Cosmic Spatial Vacuum Void.Outer Space has "3 Enormous Problems":Problem 1 - Survivability - Cosmic Space is completely and inherently uninhabitable, inhospitable and unliveable.This doesn't seem/feel right.If Outer Space truly existed it should therefore be completely and inherently habitable,hospitable and liveable.If Outer Space was real it would be 100% welcoming of All-potential Beings,Creatures and Life-forms.This means that Outer Space must be "Breathable",because otherwise Everyone and Everything would immediately and perpetually suffocate and no Life-forms would ever emerge or survive in such a lethal Cosmic Universe.Problem 2 - Cosmic Travel - All-vehicles must push "Something" in order to move and go "Somewhere".In Earth's Atmosphere Automobiles push "Air" to move,Airplanes also push "Air" to move and Cruise Ships push "Water" to move,but Outer Space has no Atmosphere.You cannot travel to/in Outer Space,because The Vacuum of Space neutralizes All-pushing power/travel power.This means that Space Travel is impossible,that No One has ever left The Earth,that No One has ever traveled to Space and that every single Space Mission from the beginning to today is a lie.If Outer Space truly existed it would need to have an "Atmosphere" in order for Outer Space Travel to be possible.Problem 3 - Vast Separation - Celestial Space is just far too tremendously vast as a territory.All-Life-forms are separated,because of the "Humongous Distance" between them.This is not convenient.If Outer Space was real it wouldn't be so gargantuan,because it has to be much smaller and more "Tightly-Knit",so that All-potential Life-forms can locate and discover each other.Outer Space is a lie designed in order to convince The Public that Extraterrestrial Beings exist.The total "Inhospitableness" and "Unfeasibility" of Outer Space proves that Outer Space cannot exist,because Outer Space doesn't exist!

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

​@@Alexander_Kaleby that logic if you 12gb harddrive works why should you get a 1tb ssd, lmao we need to evolve the problem is that Nasa does not have a big budget since the end of the space race

@@theaverageportugues4200 If you have a 12 gb harddrive and need to store a file greater than 12 gb, then the "it ain't broke" part of the thing no longer applies. More accurate would be: If all you ever need to store FITS on your 12 gb hard drive, then why would you shell out money to buy a 1 tb drive? Sure, it is new and shiny and bigger and thus automatically better, but if your existing hardware can do what needs doing, then why buy new hardware?

ditto. I'm so tired of politics in our news. Please stop it, CNBC. Thank you!

Absolutely mind boggling. Yet we should pay more taxes.

Great Comment ! Also the US Stockpile of He3 (Helium 3) Has been depleted by the TSA by the Full Body Scanners and must be replaced soon ! ! ! tjl

No. And trying to make suits with that level of radiation protection is pointless and prohibitive to both cost and capability of any astronaut wearing it. Easier ways to deal with radiation in space is: Go fast, spend less time in radiation belts. And Protect a part of the crew area, where crew can shelter during high radiation transits.

Given the costs of getting minerals back from space, I doubt that space mining is going to be viable before the 2060s, and even then I doubt it will ever be viable for most minerals. The cost of getting a kg to LEO has been reduced from $54,500 with the Space Shuttle to $1500 with the Falcon Heavy, and Starship promises to take that down to $200. Let's say that we get launch costs to LEO down to $50 per kg by the 2050s. We still will have to travel to Mars or the asteroid belt and do the mining and haul it back to Earth. That is probably going to cost $10k-$20k per kg at the beginning and with scale we can probably get that down to $500-$1000 per kg. Maybe that works for precious metals, but I can't see it ever working for metals like copper and nickel. In addition, we don't know what will be the climate and ozone impacts of all those rocket launches in the stratosphere, but the preliminary research by Martin Ross is scary. We can live within the resource limits of the planet if we prioritize it, and that is far more sustainable and less costly than trying to mine outer space. We keep figuring out how to do more with less minerals, so we could live with the Earth's existing mineral reserves, but we have chosen to not make this a priority. For example, electric vehicles used to require a lot of expensive metals (lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, aluminum, iron, neodymium, dysprosium, etc.), but the move from NMC to LFP batteries eliminates the nickel, cobalt and manganese and the move to sodium ion batteries in the future will eliminate the lithium and copper, so they only require iron and aluminum which are sustainable metals with nearly limitless reserves. New EV motor designs have reduced the amount of permanent magnets, so less neodymium, dysprosium and praseodymium are needed. Tesla says that it will use PM-free motors in the future Model 2. The Cybertruck reduces the copper in the wiring by 50% by using Ethernet+CAN data buses instead of point-to-point wiring harnesses and by using higher voltages (12V -> 48V components and 400V -> 800V batteries/motors), which reduces the thickness of the wires. Wiring and motor coils can also be switched from copper to aluminum in the future if copper becomes too scarce. The same thing is happening in the energy sector. Grid batteries are switching from NMC to LFP and in the future they will use salt water flow batteries that require no metals except stainless steel. Today's wind turbines use a lot less expensive metals. Onshore wind turbines are switching from permanent magnet direct drives and electrically excited direct drives to geared drives and doubly fed induction generators which use no permanent magnets and much less copper. Offshore wind turbines are switching from permanent magnet direct drives are switching to semi-direct drives, which contain hybrid geared and permanent magnet generators, that only need 1/5 of the weight in permanent magnets and much less copper. Thin film solar which uses lots of expensive metals/minerals (cadmium, tellurium, copper, indium, gallium, selenium) has lost to crystalline silicon solar. PV solar cells which used silver contact lines are now switching to copper contact lines. If you look at modern electronics compared to the electronics of the 1980s, it is amazing how much less minerals are needed to make today's electronic devices, and we can reduce the mineral consumption even more if we start focusing on longevity, fixability and recyclability over planned obsolescence. I already see this happening with cell phones as the standard time that cell phones are supported with software updates has increased from 2 years to 4 years over the last couple years and the EU is creating standards to require that cell phones manufacturers use the same charging port and replaceable batteries. The average lifespan of vehicles has also increased from 100,000 to 200,000 miles and and EVs with LFP batteries should increase vehicle lifespan in the future to 400,000 miles. We can redesign all sorts of things for longevity and fixability, so we need less resources. The average lifespan of clothes has reduced by half over the last 30 years, but we could go back to making clothes that last longer. We can get rid of most single-use plastics if we charged a tax on single-use bottles and bags and sold things in reusable containers. The move from fossil fuels to renewable energy will eliminate 40% of ocean shipping and the move to local agriculture can eliminate another 10%, so we can get rid of half of ocean shipping. Given that 92.5% of new electricity generation was renewable energy in the first half of 2023, we are on track to get to 100% renewable electricity by the mid 2040s, and we could get there by 2035 if every country decides that it is a priority.

@@amosbatto3051I agree, efficiently using materials will prolong our window of opportunity. Especially if we can move away from infrastructure and into small scale in-situ resource utilization and power generation. By far the most effective energy saving measure we could utilize is passive solar design in all of our buildings. That would reduce energy consumption by 60%. At least for homes. Transportation remains the greatest draw on resources and energy. So developing sustainable in-situ greenhouses integrated into every home will also provide a great deal of energy saving and health benefits. However, I am not proposing that we should bring the resources back to earth. Rather, we should master the technology to process, refine material, and manufacture in space. Not to return home, rather to expand our civilization to the outer planets and moons in the solar system. Eventually we could construct entire stations and extremely large vessels in space. To be able to extend the duration of our civilization beyond the current extinction event. By my calculations we have less than 100 years before the climate will render earth largely infertile and inhospitable to most forms of life. There will be pockets that remain. But there is no guarantee that we can continue to survive through these cycles especially given the rise in industrial pollution and related cancers. I envision the use of modular systems that work like a nano bot swarm. Redundant, small scale self automating swarms that can begin the first stages of construction in space. Leading to foundries, chemical processing, gas, and fuel generation facilities. That can also provide the essential building blocks for life and agriculture in space. It could compliment potential advancements in technology like the ability to copy our brains into a computer system that can be replicated and repaired. That may be a viable alternative to simulate reality in the vacuum of space without any gravity. Purely reliant on energy sources as opposed to complex ecological systems required to sustain humans.

Yep. No scarcity = no value.

That would be the point, yes. When you have an abundance of resources, the price of everything drops. Your phone, yourr car, your personal spaceship will all cost less money. Don't count on gold getting much cheaper though. The market is already being controlled, the future gold market will ALSO be controlled. That said, you already CAN get certain jewels for a reduced price. emeralds, saphires, diamonds and rubies can all be made artificially, if memory serves.

Not real hahaha

How about just put it in Mars orbit, mine directly from the asteroid

@@jordenrisley6761 much easier to mine on foot with hand tools

Advances require money, money requires investors, investors require profit

Supongo que algunos saben acerca de la integración en la microeconomía para ayudar a sustituir FIAT o USDT por una experiencia de intercambio más tangible, aunque se parece más a una capitalización con alrededor del 43,307% de ganancias/ROI semanal... PD. Stuart Michael, me cubrió, gracias.

@Investuarstmichael

en telegrama

美国美国美国美国美国美国美国美国 十𝟒𝟒𝟕448268213👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾✴✴ 国美国美国美国 美国美国美国美国美.

whtsapp

YEAH YOU LOVE COMPLETE DARKNESS, THE MINUS 500 C AND NO OXYGEN

which space?

Actually recovery of meteorites is a long way off. You’d just slams it through the atmosphere at some country willing to let you do it. Somewhere with land and cheap labor for the mine etc.

Outer Space doesn't exist.Earth is the only World there is.There are no other Physical Cosmic Worlds out there and there is no Infinite Cosmic Spatial Vacuum Void.Outer Space has "3 Enormous Problems":Problem 1 - Survivability - Cosmic Space is completely and inherently uninhabitable, inhospitable and unliveable.This doesn't seem/feel right.If Outer Space truly existed it should therefore be completely and inherently habitable,hospitable and liveable.If Outer Space was real it would be 100% welcoming of All-potential Beings,Creatures and Life-forms.This means that Outer Space must be "Breathable",because otherwise Everyone and Everything would immediately and perpetually suffocate and no Life-forms would ever emerge or survive in such a lethal Cosmic Universe.Problem 2 - Cosmic Travel - All-vehicles must push "Something" in order to move and go "Somewhere".In Earth's Atmosphere Automobiles push "Air" to move,Airplanes also push "Air" to move and Cruise Ships push "Water" to move,but Outer Space has no Atmosphere.You cannot travel to/in Outer Space,because The Vacuum of Space neutralizes All-pushing power/travel power.This means that Space Travel is impossible,that No One has ever left The Earth,that No One has ever traveled to Space and that every single Space Mission from the beginning to today is a lie.If Outer Space truly existed it would need to have an "Atmosphere" in order for Outer Space Travel to be possible.Problem 3 - Vast Separation - Celestial Space is just far too tremendously vast as a territory.All-Life-forms are separated,because of the "Humongous Distance" between them.This is not convenient.If Outer Space was real it wouldn't be so gargantuan,because it has to be much smaller and more "Tightly-Knit",so that All-potential Life-forms can locate and discover each other.Outer Space is a lie designed in order to convince The Public that Extraterrestrial Beings exist.The total "Inhospitableness" and "Unfeasibility" of Outer Space proves that Outer Space cannot exist,because Outer Space doesn't exist!

Because this is pure fantasy and fake.

So, we land hundreds of kilograms of astronaut (+ protective spacecraft) each time a crew mission returns. Several orders of magnitude more are possible, if the entry velocity is managed properly (orbital mechanics and aerobraking). But by far the bigger market is not on Earth; it's in space ... or will be.

Some aren't planning to bring them back to Earth. They can leave them in orbit for use in space.

Should happen this year.

Could you provide a source?

Blah blah...it ain't gonna do s***.

@@ejkalegal3145 That's what they said about Falcon

@@firstduckofwellington6889 These are puny craft. The ISS is not a "space station" but merely a space platform. We should have aircraft carrier sized space vessels by now. We should have spin stabilisation artificial gravity large space stations by now. We should have 1000+ colonist space colonies on the Moon and Mars by now. I am deeply unsatisfied and ashamed by our lack of progress this last half century.

Cellphone has become so much more than voice + text

@@ejkalegal3145 Based on what evidence?

400 million is nothing in the big picture of the us budgeting everything go the military .

What do you mean? Do you mean it will be much higher than $4 billion?

The shame is the person who wants to take other people's hard earned money because you deem so.

That is before taxes

I wouldn't be surprised if they recycle content