this is gonna be top comment mark my word

Quick af

Good bot

👆 that's why AI is far from human intelligence

@@Pine_Woodoh, hi mark

Pretty cool of Jeff to actually read comments that point out issues. A guy mentioned the apples vs oranges thing in the previous video, and Jeff listened.

Wait, you guys are employed?

Failed startup gang rise up!

That's what you get when you parrot daily news about a new/upcoming tech. Especially when said news only parrot whatever some PR person claims. Always take tech news with a couple grains of salt. It's all clickbait for sweet advertisement money, especially on UKposts.

*high five! fireship is the vibe ngl

Are you claiming to be more autistic than AI?

yeah, i wish ai could take my fucking job

Are you worried about the possibility of circus monkeys replacing you?

Well you should

Lul

Yeah some people though they have AGI... their AGI... It's like that old joke... "Mom told me we have the same at home...."

@@Slav4o911 Us: "We want AGI!" Google: "We have AGI at home!" AGI at Home: "If you put a ball in a cup and flip it upside-down, then pick up the cup, the ball will remain in the cup due to gravity." ~Bard's actual response to one of my test questions

Remember when google told us they were less than a year away from developing a quantum computing chip? Good times.

Bard is a joke

Google has good history of releasing "fake papers". Basically, they make bunch of BS claims but when you take their resarch and do 3rd party analysis it always ends up being useless shit that is worse than alternatives. And this has repeated itself so many times in basically every field of AI.

Almost every tech company is like this tho, but norms are catching up to this exaggeration

They might Aswell say '' in the future we believe our products will be able to do X Y Z but at the moment it's just another char GPT clone".

I doubt it, I think most people have lived in reality long enough to know that this is always being done, and especially investors will read the small print. We all know how adverting works, and this wasn't even technically a lie. It's like the robot videos that are sped up, it takes the robot like 10 minutes to put the pen in the drawer, we see the 30 second video so it looks better and we'll actually watch it. But the tech is still super impressive and worth the investment. The only thing Google did really wrong here was saying "look how much better than GPT we are" when in reality it's about the same and about a year behind.

Google does this because they are a bunch of talentless shills. Open Ai, and Meta to a less degree don't need to do this.

@@peanutcelery Not every tech company is like this (not even close to most either) and the norms aren't catching up to the exaggeration either. I'd bet my left nut and 20k usd that for every tech company that you can find that misleads to an egregious degree (like Google's Gemini bs), I can find 10 that do not (do note I can just pull up like 100k wordpress companies that do indeed deliver what they promise). Also every AI youtuber was dick over butt for the *clearly* falsified gemini video that was *obviously* bs because in order for Google to have achieved what they claimed, they would have had to not only unlock gpt5 tier *multimodal* inference with 1B speeds, but a whole another step forward to gpt6 as well because in order to achieve the kind of contextual awareness that they claimed (*on model level* and not choreography or preprogrammed behavior) then we're talking straight up human brain simulation or close to it (on model level, not fancy supplementary rag/memory trickery). And that's so god damn painfully obvious. The conclusion is that the AI youtubers are just too uncaring, dumb and/or clueless to know any better. They make videos and that's it. They simply cannot ever reach a point where they might be able to discern what is bs. That then get's extrapolated to all the other subdomains from hvacs to makeup to detransitioning and people are still going to be stupid as fuck. Individuals might better their brainways for a hot second, but en masse, nothing will change. So, wrong and wrong.

That's the only thing which gives actually good results, because we all tinker with the thing and collaborate. 100 000 humans are better than 10. The more humans interreact with a model, the more intelligent it becomes, look at what happened with Stable diffusion, and how it beats everything in the image generation.... and now it even starts to do video generation. The moment we have a model like stable diffusion with the chat models, most these corporate closed source models will be gone. Google doesn't have much time, if they want to do anything they have less than an year. The open source models are becoming better by the day, people mix them and enhance them.

Also all of the companies making AI behind closed doors are trying to monetize it over cloud services. Personally, if you can't run it on your own hardware, I'm not interested in it.

​@@phokeydhoo8940I wholeheartedly agree with you. At least open source AIs do come with downloads so you can run them on your PC instead of waiting on a 1K person queue for hours.

Hmm interesting ive been trying to influence gpt but i think i need to work on an open source project. Imagine some random person make AGI before these big corporations and its open source. Would be a gift to the world

the future (of software) is open source

And then Google will be finishing their next product and the cycle continues

​@@jamessderby A cycle which brings us automatically more and more towards skynet!

​@@ky00j1n6i am sure skynet is already operating without anyone knowing

@@ky00j1n6 love that for us

​​@@jamessderbyGoogle is still finishing Ultra. How do they finish another at the same time? That's some Gemini level reasoning!

Yeah lowkey still trash

there are 3 versions of gemini, you used the middle version, the best version is still behind closed doors ATM.

​@@theresalwaysanotherway3996Like he says, I'll believe it when I see it

waiting for gemini ultra, the gemini version you tried is still worse than gpt 4

There's no reason to expect Google to be able to top OpenAI's product. OpenAI has a huge headstart and this is all they do. Their product is the best on the planet. Google is just desperately trying to get back marketshare.

Yes! And more over I couldn't find the information about the kakashka-class bomb.

see youtube is all about human attention. you are most likely to open a video when you are most terrified. that is all they are doing

@@harshmehta329 And yet many people clicked on this video instead. Theres a lot of people on the Ai hype bandwagon reporting on the same thing and many of them have no clue what they are talking about, just reading off news articles form a single source. Between clicking on a bj face thumbnail and a non bj faced one, I'm going to click on the latter that relies on their reputation of providing good accurate entertaining content rather than clickbait thumbnails & titles when it comes to news about something I want to learn about.

they're just desperate. They know their site is the first one to be replaced by ChatGPT. Why Google stuff now if you can just look it up with AI?

putther is cooking something

2 balls 1 mouth :D

Neuron Activation 🧠

2 girls, 1 cup

@@KrunoslavSaho 2 men 1 horse

😂😂😂😂

They almost certainly have Ultra. They plan to charge people for it after all. But seems like on a scale of 3.5 to 4, it's looking more like a 3.9 instead of a 4.1, and of course, as we all know, 4 is the magic number ;)

Why would they put disclaimers about the results in when they don't actually have the model?

@@meepk633they were just disclosing the results were based on a multimodal hodgepodge but that’s everything. GPT-4/ChatGPT is in no way one all seeing model either. Tons of prompt engineering in the background and many different instances of different models working to bring you one answer. Not sure why that part was a big deal to anyone.

Hmmm youtube didn't shadow ban your comment for saying mfer. Strange. I get banned everyday for saying far less. I hate youtube comment section it's extremely restricted

ASCII, actually

ASCII what you did there

ASCII actually (continuing the chain)

ASCII, actually

ASCII, actually

It got you the same way advertisers and propagandists get you everyday.

It was the same with Deepblue vs Kasparov. He had basically no sleep, was in an uncomfortable environment and not having a good day among other things.

At least they've beaten the impaired Stockfish, but we don't see Alpha Zero anywhere right now playing chess. Now they can't even beat the impaired GPT4, but they think someone is going to use their braindead bot... nobody is going to waste their time with that Google bot.

@@KyriosHeptagrammaton Yes. Well said. (‘Yes, but.’) computation HAS altered upper hominid chess play post deep 🧢 hat - because access to such processing means binary adversarial Homo sapiens are both now playing against Turing machines at simultaneous scales. Ergo, Old Mate Magnus deploys more aggressive - read only human - tactics 2 execute strategy: Mow, Blow & Go; akin 2 latter, although Lee Sodol also deployed what in Australia we all a ‘Smoko’.

I think they ran stock fish on the computer that Google bot uses and stock fish still lost

​@@djgg8156I think he meant a different kind of trust. The trust in the fact that the company has the product they purport to deliver

@@djgg8156 if you think google is any more responsible for AI development and advancement than meta, you obviously learned about AI after chatgpt already dropped

@@djgg8156 wrong, T stands for Transformer (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) and most people I know use pytorch (developed by Meta)

Also the t in gpt stands for transformer, not tensor. Gpt is generative pretrained transformer.

Meta is the most interesting company at the moment thanks to Mark Zuckerberg owning it and him being a tech person at heart.

Holy shit that's true, where tf did THAT go 😂

Lol google is just all bark no bite. Remember they even said that they have a image gen model that can do text but it never released and DeepFloyd came out.

I mean, this type of technology is probably capable of that. For example, ChatGPT given an interface with a hairdresser api, your calendar, and the ability to start listening with a keyword could do it, so it's probable that Google will figure it out at some point, and it's certainly possible, at least by some metrics.

Theyve scrapped that in order not to be insensitive to bald guys like me.

I actually was able to use this but to make dinner reservations not a haircut appointment it legit worked

Not if I give you misinformation to poison your code. 1+1=3 Take that.

How to ionise uranium nucleus safely at home

one does have to wonder to what extent Google is already doing that

Let me be the first to say I for one welcome you.

What will you do when you rule for it

msb or lsb?

@@typedef_ there is no BOM in the message so it's platform-dependant.

wrong, it spells GEMINI, capitalization is important in ASCI, and yeah, it is binary

@@budgetarms fixed, thanks! (and it's ASCII with two Is (: )

@@typedef_ depends on the writing direction ;-)

Have you tried the same on chatgpt? Pro should be around 3.5 Turbo level so not even as good as Bing.

@@MrDezokokotar not yet, but I did copy the prompt and results to compare with chatgpt in app (free), so I guess the excitement and hooha was for naught for non-paid users. is there a way to try out the most cutting edge AI shown in the demos (hopefully accessible on a phone)? what is the most advanced free model rn, probably Gemini Pro/GPT3.5?

​@@MrDezokokotarbing uses a mix of gpt-4 and Microsoft's own Turing model, which I believe is around gpt-3.5 levels

We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills We shall never surrender!

No fear!

I don't know if you'll have a job until you can retire but enjoy the ride and make as much as you can...

Or you could step outside the Matrix once and for all by seeing the trutrh, believing the Bible and discovering flat earth like fireship.

why would anyone want to fight against AI?

Make sure to wear gloves and safety googles **wheeze**

Everyone says every tech channel is the best tech channel on UKposts.

@@squamish4244 not this guy

@@RenderingUser Alright then. I say AI Explained is better.

@@squamish4244 he is not, all his videos are just "agi next month"

@@harshmehta329 No he doesn't say that lol

If you were a genius, you’d invest in XDC

But Adblock is already back into blocking it normally.. I had to kept it off for a few days, but then an update fixed it

​@@vinnicfI'm using uBlock origin. Later on, after following the steps everyone posted on Reddit and not getting the problem solved, I noticed it may be another extension: DuckDuckGo privacy essentials. I will keep trying.

My advice to anyone fooled by these LLM bots : these bots can't do sh*t. And no they won't replace humans. Because they're literally just a word guessing bot.. and that's worthless

​@@aaaaaa-hh8cqThey can do a lot, especially if used for learning / coding / quick idea generation. It s not a word guessing bot wtf

​@mateidumitrescu238 they can do a lot but as the same time much less than people think. First 2hours with a bot are impressive first 100 hours teaches you how limited it is. It isn't replacing anyone any time soon

I’m using codeium at the minute which is supposed to be one of the better ones and it’s almost always wrong in a least one way *per line*. It’s slightly more productive maybe 20% because it type faster than me and having a few incorrect methods defined is a better starting point than a blank page

​@@mateidumitrescu238if it's not a word guessing bot. Then explain to me how it works.

yep. Shouldn't trust anything coming out of them. They're the most shady AI company right now imo. Just desperate to catch up with OpenAI and co. to not become obsolete.

Damn , Google and lies ? Thats CRAZY!!! 😱😱😱😱

Don't lie about being shocked

Do you want to know more about Gemini here is the link to my video :- ukposts.info/have/v-deo/q2OnoKWWi4pzuKc.html

He uses AI with the comments section as a data base to maximize every joke in the video. It's over.

@@Novacki_ Of course there's AI involved :)

This is a good idea

What are they trying to imply by "via API" ? That maybe OpenAI caught that Google was doing benchmarks, and they put their smartest employee behind the endpoint to do the test instead ? Nice one Google...

@@eldonad It means that it's not via the chat interface that we mortals use, but the uncensored version for pure performance benchmarking without the straightjacket.

You can just say anything on here. It's wild.

That is not how this works. It says "reported" because they took the data from someone's "report", as opposed to the Gemini data, which they got from their own experiment. I don't know how "via API" could possibly imply that something isn't entirely true.

@@NNOTM We're in the era of "I don't understand something so it must be evidence of the first conspiracy that pops into my head." It's a shame that educational channels have an incentive to encourage bizarre ignorant tribalism.

Because it's all hype, intended to mislead, investors and (future) customers. People who have never seen these type of bots might be easily mislead. They might think Google has something very close to GPT4, when in reality they have something very close or slightly above GPT3.5 .

No bear army? Reality is disappointing.

💩

kakashka-class nucler warhead babyyy

Yeaa

that would be great, but still gpt-4 turbo is better than gpt-4 and it will cost less (at least on the API)

Yeah, no way is it going to be free. The major tech companies are the only ones in the world with the data that these things run on, and as long as governments allow them to capitalise on that they will. In years past a similar technology would be seized by governments around the world and development would continue at a governmental (likely military or intelligence) level, but in the present day it seems unlikely. it's honestly kinda ironic how much governments these days are willing to give up opportunities to gain either power or money, but I guess it goes to show who's backing the politicians running them.

@@gonzalobruna7154 gpt4 turbo is called turbo because it's supposed to be FASTER, not better. Otherwise it would make no sense to make it cost less than base

Gemini Ultra is better than GPT4 by most measures. Just not by as much as you might think if you believed the press release version rather than the actual research papers.

@traveller23e yeah that's true but also consider that running these huge language models is quite expensive and they also need income to keep them running for literally millions of people

If you believe their charter, OpenAI doesn't care about market share at all. They only care about producing AGI.

Google will release Gemini Ultra Pro Max soon. Let's see.😄

@@fasmotion On private previews with NDAs getting your entire bank account if you say something wrong about them.

and Google will release it who knows when next year, we might have gpt 5 by the time google is ready to release gemini ultra.

Gemini Pro on Bard feels even worse than GPT 3.5 on ChatGPT.

​@@fasmotionmore like "prolapse"

Do you want to know more about Gemini here is the link to my video :- ukposts.info/have/v-deo/q2OnoKWWi4pzuKc.html

It's 2023 and we already forgot the 2020 lessons. Forced to work with positive C19 (like old flus) and no voluntary mask either, guests will greatly enjoy my coughing and sneezing LETS GOOOOOOL

We need local models as fast as possible before Washington starts getting their hands on this.

​@@user-he4ef9br7zHuggingface your source, every day a new model published. You don't even need GPU for such with GGUF format CPU models, which also there. Decent CPU + many RAM is enough to run even the biggest Llama 2 70 billions. But I'm really waiting for tools to run at least two models together or etc. Samantha is very popular and recommended if you are a fan of movie "Her".

I'm pretty sure gemini ultra is below gpt 4. Even if its around the same performance, open ai will overtake it in no time.

Ironically, while Google has the resources because it’s a huge corporation, it has much more to lose because of its size. Billions of people use their products everyday, so if they screw up their AI, they'd be under a lot of scrutiny.

Thank you for doing these vibes-based predictions for us. I'm a big techie.

the high profile channels??? like AI Explained and David Shapiro's LOL. Ok

Yeaa

IKR google hasn't gotten anything right since Elon took over X, Meta too

​@@ryanodneal7001Google hardly gets anything right. It's their mantra

I mean, the corporation published the real benchmarks. They just put them in their research papers rather than their "press release". And if you're genuinely just learning "Don't trust press releases" then I hope you at least have the excuse of being young :).