The genius of Edward Witten | Cumrun Vafa and Lex Fridman

  Переглядів 316,140

Lex Clips

Lex Clips

2 роки тому

Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Cumrun Vafa: String Th...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- Headspace: headspace.com/lex to get free 1 month trial
- The Jordan Harbinger Show: / thejordanharbingershow
- Squarespace: lexfridman.com/squarespace and use code LEX to get 10% off
- Allform: allform.com/lex to get 20% off
GUEST BIO:
Cumrun Vafa is a theoretical physicist at Harvard.
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
SOCIAL:
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridman
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Reddit: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman

КОМЕНТАРІ: 401
@stevem437
@stevem437 Рік тому
"I dual-majored in math and physics at MIT" "I got my Ph.D in physics from Princeton working with Ed Witten" "By the time I got to Harvard..." Dude, stop. You're absoultely CRUSHING it
@shmookins
@shmookins Рік тому
I can't even get accepted at a community collage. >_
@johnmwania979
@johnmwania979 Рік тому
​@@shmookinsyou and me both
@aaronhrynyk
@aaronhrynyk Рік тому
@@shmookins maybe because it’s a college. Not a collage lol
@bobbyv3
@bobbyv3 Рік тому
Dr. Vafa was working with and being advised by Edward Witten. Undoubledly there would have been some insecurities forming and now that he's able to speak--as an expert--to us regular 'still wiping our butts with dry paper' folks... let's give him the validation he's looking for and the respect he deserves from accomplishing those feats! *I just finished Season 2 of Frasier, hence the psycoanalysis. I've never met Dr. Vafa and I barely understand emotions beyond "I'm hungry." Ipsofacto, most of that was in jest. I've been awake since Friday and I keep pondering what it would be like to hang out with four K9 police dogs while I was writing that. What I'm getting at is ignore me, I'm talking about of my arse. :)
@rubiskelter
@rubiskelter Рік тому
@@shmookins you must first learn how to write "college"! Then its straight on!
@Abellt1d
@Abellt1d Рік тому
Rogan's podcast yesterday with Eric Weinstein brought me here lol. Was the first I'd heard of Mr. Witten. Awesome!
@kmb_jr
@kmb_jr Рік тому
Yupp as soon as Eric said he was afraid of him I paused and went digging 🤣😂🤣
@RealDDDeal
@RealDDDeal Рік тому
Ditto. From within the constellations of knowledge we draw the same lines
@adityaprakash2078
@adityaprakash2078 Рік тому
Guy is scared to debate this guy
@mombojom3
@mombojom3 Рік тому
I heard Witten’s voice on JRE before I saw him and he sounded like a Bond villain! 😂
@brettbiehler5283
@brettbiehler5283 Рік тому
Same, frigging fascinating
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 Рік тому
This is a brilliant explanation of the difference between rigour and physical intuition that so many physicists talk about
@nohandler1493
@nohandler1493 8 місяців тому
But how come, physical intuition correct the mathematical consistency and rigour. Isn't it intuition just gambling? Math is a way to reduce the unpredictability.
@elputas
@elputas 5 місяців тому
Witten is only mathematical games of which the link to reality is still a promise. That's all.
@andimumxhiu6144
@andimumxhiu6144 9 місяців тому
It’s been a long time since the last time I enjoyed an interview as much as this one. The passion he has and the way he describes everything, the fluency, the vocabulary.. amazing.
@therealjordiano
@therealjordiano 8 місяців тому
Love when these guys go into detail, gets you a sense of what it's really like workin on these things
@slipperysloper3721
@slipperysloper3721 Рік тому
Proud to say I understood some of the words used in this video.
@robertbrown3205
@robertbrown3205 2 роки тому
Thanks for posting this interview, so interesting to have personal insight into working alongside Edward Witten.
@annaclarafenyo8185
@annaclarafenyo8185 Рік тому
While Vafa is a fantastic physicist, I think it's ironic that one of the things that Vafa gets most credit for, topological string theory, is actually Witten's idea. Vafa is responsible for Mirror Symmetry, for F theory, for various brane constructions, he's also a great physicist of the top rank, but Topological String Theory screams Ed Witten so much, just in the mathematical construction, it's like he signed it with his name by creating it, even though I always heard it attributed to Vafa. The reason it's Witten is not just that he wrote the first paper, it's also the twisted supersymmetry construction, turning it into a BRST charge, which is the construction Witten milked to get Donaldson invariants, topological field theories and knot invariants, and also Topological Strings, it's just what Witten did in that era of the late 80s.
@Youtuube304s
@Youtuube304s Рік тому
I have no idea what you just said but I'm inclined to agree.
@sibusisofaya7874
@sibusisofaya7874 Рік тому
What are you talking about
@annaclarafenyo8185
@annaclarafenyo8185 Рік тому
@@sibusisofaya7874 The misattribution of ideas in physics.
@sibusisofaya7874
@sibusisofaya7874 Рік тому
@@annaclarafenyo8185 lol I'm in Finance so I'm lost
@annaclarafenyo8185
@annaclarafenyo8185 Рік тому
@@sibusisofaya7874 It's not about physics dude, you shouldn't be lost. It's about who deserves credit for what. Vafa for Mirror Symmetry, Witten for Topological String Theory. Sheesh.
@Achrononmaster
@Achrononmaster Рік тому
@4:30 I loved this little anecdote. Sounds like Witten is unafraid to function as a platonist. The theoretical physicist who has a platonistic perspective has this power that every formalist and logical positivist cannot comprehend. They can of course be completely nuts and go way off the rails into fancy (like just every neoclassical economist ever), but they have this creative capacity they permit themselves. Everyone has it, but others do not permit themselves to exercise it fully.
@fizipcfx
@fizipcfx Рік тому
sir, i completely understood your comment
@kevincochran5844
@kevincochran5844 Рік тому
Achronicmasterbeater
@jimmydean5663
@jimmydean5663 Рік тому
Dumb this down I have pee drying on my leg
@arne8158
@arne8158 Рік тому
@@jimmydean5663 you should pee on it to rinse it off.
@michaelblankenau6598
@michaelblankenau6598 8 місяців тому
I'm not sure how that relates to the Kardashian's but I think I get your point .
@JAYMOAP
@JAYMOAP Рік тому
Absolute legend. Got an email from him years back still make my day
@ishyandmikkischannel8811
@ishyandmikkischannel8811 Рік тому
Search for a UKposts video of 1979 Nobel Prize winner Abdus Salam discussing with Ed Witten - fascinating to listen to now. In 1990, I asked Salam what area shouid I work on - and he mentioned Chern-Simons theory in mathematics. I asked him who were the other great hope apart from ed Witten and he mentioned Cumrun Vafa. Now the other half of Chern-Simons is the famous mathematicain James Simons, who set up the hedge fund Rentech. And of course Vafa was hired by Rentech. Small world!
@koroglurustem1722
@koroglurustem1722 Рік тому
Absolutely amazing
@mrgyani
@mrgyani 4 місяці тому
Thanks for sharing..
@UnbekannterSoldat74
@UnbekannterSoldat74 Рік тому
This is such good advice to help learning and develop passion for a subject. Connecting theory and practicality demands creativity and I think that's where truly invested people stand out from those who learn stuff just for the sake of making a living with it.
@eddie1136
@eddie1136 Рік тому
Thanks for your interview! Very informative! Is it possible to invite Ed Witten to have an interview with? I believe it will be rather exciting!
@videojeroki
@videojeroki Рік тому
i recently learn how to solve a ribik's cube in less than 10min, so i can relate to Mr Witten. Joke aside, i'm glad our society is free enough for those people to rise and in a long terme be able to improve the live of millions.
@Carefaceeeee
@Carefaceeeee 2 роки тому
Man i would love if you could get Edward on the show :) Im afraid of his intellect in a good way
@TheLuminousOne
@TheLuminousOne Рік тому
Don't be scared, homie.
@Carefaceeeee
@Carefaceeeee Рік тому
@@Dave-qi3ft I agree he is abit alien but i guess thats the price you pay with a brain like that :) I still want him there ,he is interesting to me.
@genises200
@genises200 Рік тому
Why afraid? I don't understand why Eric on joe rogans podcast said he was afraid
@ashleybritton644
@ashleybritton644 Рік тому
@Mr M I think he was touching on the fear of debating with him, a man who can out think you at every turn, any and all arguments and improved upon, even In your perspective he improves upon but ultimately breaks it down and out thinks your thunk and proves you are wrong or not up on his level at every turn. In other words, you are at ground level surrounded by a 6ft bush and he's standing on Everest with a full 360 view, able to zoom In on the ants.
@Carefaceeeee
@Carefaceeeee Рік тому
@@ashleybritton644 Na i think he meant that he is an alien ,pretty sure :)
@markphc99
@markphc99 2 роки тому
I was unhappy in my 1st Chemistry degree - wanting to understand everything , but not having time to study the deep mathematical foundations of the physical chemistry I was being taught
@TrangNguyen-pz9ht
@TrangNguyen-pz9ht 2 роки тому
I have the same feeling when studying chemistry. The issue is that we don't have the chance to learn the physics behind so I feel like everything I learnt in chemistry is mostly memorizing.
@shawnmlekush2806
@shawnmlekush2806 Рік тому
As an amateur psychologist deeply interested in remarkable individuals, I am SO thrilled to have seen this! Thank U!!!
@aeimcinternetional
@aeimcinternetional Рік тому
Vafa is a great physicist (one with a nice personality) in his own right, and very much worth listening to!
@hojowojo
@hojowojo 7 місяців тому
Vafa’s taken the career path that i want to take exactly. Go to MIT, dual major in math and physics because i love both so much, go to a good grad school for physics, and continue studying math and physics for the rest of my life. i can really relate to him
@user-gl7zc6ze1u
@user-gl7zc6ze1u 7 місяців тому
Good luck!!
@-NINE-THREE-
@-NINE-THREE- 6 місяців тому
Oh you mean Ol Cumrun 😂
@ClearMystic
@ClearMystic 4 місяці тому
6:36 Fyi - The Calabi-Yau manifold - That's the geometry you see when on 5-Meo-Dmt
@pilucapiluca9735
@pilucapiluca9735 Рік тому
2:28 Yes, I felt the same, I starting studing Physics and I change to Maths because of the "lack of rigor". It troubled me too.
@Henry-kv7zl
@Henry-kv7zl Рік тому
As an arts kid: how did you recognize the lack of rigor? What sort of person do you need to be to be able to recognize that lack of rigor, and act upon it like vafa here? Like, I guess, how did u notice the lack of vigor? And did you attempt to reframe it somehow?
@bohanxu6125
@bohanxu6125 Рік тому
The tale of a young mathematician learning the power of hand-waving~
@dontwannabefound
@dontwannabefound Рік тому
Ha ha
@texansforever6782
@texansforever6782 Рік тому
if my parents called me cumrun im rioting
@natmanprime4295
@natmanprime4295 Рік тому
Good stuff, very interesting...! Academic barriers are being broken...
@onedone2011
@onedone2011 2 роки тому
Also an All Pro Tight End for The Dallas Cowboys? This dude is well rounded.
@reimannx33
@reimannx33 2 роки тому
Tight end?
@onedone2011
@onedone2011 2 роки тому
@@reimannx33 lol.
@mrbubbles69able
@mrbubbles69able Рік тому
Yes
@danielbendavid3457
@danielbendavid3457 Рік тому
No, that would Jason Witten. Different first name. You get no credit for completely mismatching the first name. Booo to you and pal, boo.
@Leopar525
@Leopar525 Рік тому
Can we possibly hope you do an Edward Witten interview or is this too much to ask?
@muhammedpatel7181
@muhammedpatel7181 Рік тому
My God, these intellectuals live and think in a different dimension. How incredible
@riogc3257
@riogc3257 Рік тому
The guy is not even a mathematician 🤦🏽‍♂️ I’m glad he’s getting recognition now. I known about this dude for a while and I can say… he’s fucking smart AF!!!
@xxxs8309
@xxxs8309 Рік тому
Please interview Ed Witten
@Robinson8491
@Robinson8491 2 роки тому
Great story
@briank1263
@briank1263 Рік тому
Why are we just now hearing about this man? He's 71 years old ffs.
@StephenMcmonagle-dv4kf
@StephenMcmonagle-dv4kf Рік тому
maybe because of his name bro, u think they wanna pump that mainstream ?
@winstonbrown1516
@winstonbrown1516 Рік тому
Because the Western World likes Dumb. Why listen/pay attention to this Man when we have important pastimes, like, Story Time with Drag Males, Love Island, Praising males swimming against Females and beating them. Oh, and Biden's always a great listen!
@dannygibson2597
@dannygibson2597 Рік тому
because you only get information from Joe Rogan and Lex Friedman lmao if you had absolutely any interest in physics you would already know his name
@1eV
@1eV 11 місяців тому
@@dannygibson2597 I'm 4th year physics student and I just got to know him
@davidjackowski4336
@davidjackowski4336 9 місяців тому
Like the Gaussian pill box trick?
@anatheistsopinion9974
@anatheistsopinion9974 2 роки тому
Well his name contains the word wit.
@jonathanpopham5483
@jonathanpopham5483 2 роки тому
Edward and upward
@CurlyJefferson482
@CurlyJefferson482 2 роки тому
Aptronym
@StephenMcmonagle-dv4kf
@StephenMcmonagle-dv4kf Рік тому
meanwhile ''cumrum"
@mehridin
@mehridin 10 місяців тому
​@@StephenMcmonagle-dv4kfcumrun vs. ramamandeep
@mahatmaniggandhi2898
@mahatmaniggandhi2898 3 місяці тому
😭​@@StephenMcmonagle-dv4kf
@darwinlaluna3677
@darwinlaluna3677 6 місяців тому
Is every planet has der own temperature? Do gravity affect different temperatures?
@Sileonex123
@Sileonex123 7 місяців тому
Omg this man is great
@haydnrogan6789
@haydnrogan6789 Рік тому
Very deep and thoughtful. Also ' Cumrun ' .
@TheCpHaddock
@TheCpHaddock Рік тому
Dude as an Iranian I have no idea why he chose to write his name like that in English! Everyone with that name write it as Kamran! But a true genius otherwise!
@jackietate5222
@jackietate5222 Рік тому
This new challenges between the differing views in physics is much better than the previous mantra of E=mc². Like, it's useful, but it doesn't explain everything for a reason. Like, there is something beneath Relativity and Quantum Physics. The same way that JavaScript and HTML are under a webpage, but also alongside that there might be Django or Java under it. But, you are still going to have limits within JavaScript/HTML/Django-Java. Because, underneath that, ultimately under the webpage it's zeros and ones. And even under the zeros and ones there will be anomalies, because where did the zeros and ones come from? Physics has to keep that mentality. Religion has largely abandoned it. If we could get religion to bring that mentality back, I think that we could see the same kind of progress in society that we see in physics and labs.
@historyre-visited4597
@historyre-visited4597 7 місяців тому
a very interesting channel, no doubt.
@markarend8226
@markarend8226 Рік тому
I wanna know what He says after three Hits of DMT....
@rsa78
@rsa78 Рік тому
We should talk about his father and what he knows about his work… Louis Witten worked on anti-gravity for the government since the 50’s…
@josefnavratil646
@josefnavratil646 Рік тому
"Our universe", after the big bang, is a "local place" in Euclidean flat infinite 3+3D spacetime, (ie the state before the big bang, flat, infinite, no matter, no chow flow, no expansion, how else when infinite.). It's the final location that begins-it occurs at the big bang, which is not an explosion, but a change from the previous state to the next, to the plasma state, and that's an ultra-high curvature of 3+3 dimensions of two quantities. It's a boiling vacuum, it's a foam dimensions, i.e. an extremely curved environment; that is, it is a "finite" Universe in an "infinite" flat space-time that "floats" in it. The basic Euclidean network - a grid, 3+3 uncurved dimensions, in the state before the big bang, it is still around us, it exists not only before the big bang, but also after it, it is around us and we and the whole complex universe with matter and galaxies and black holes and gravitational fields, (which are crooked dimensions), we "float" in that flat basic 3+3D network of space-time. The beautiful thing is that even a mathematician will wonder if he doesn't have to explore "how" big is the singularity = "locality-our universe" and will have to recognize the possibility of proposing the reality that in an infinite 3+3D non-curved space-time there are finite localities, arbitrarily large, that is near-infinite and near-zero... Not even mathematicians can determine how large a "unit" is-a unit interval of length or time in an infinite grid grid. That place is "our universe", just one. No nonsense like “multiverses. And the Big Bang was not the creation of the universe "out of nothing" (as string theorists claim), but it was a "jump = jump change of state" from the previous to the next, a "jump" from a completely flat spacetime to a completely curved spacetime.., with extremely curved dimensions , which have been unfolding for 13.8 billion years!!!!, A) They don't expand, but unfold into the global curvature of the "real structure" (The sky full of galaxies and everything we see "floats" the differently curved dimensions of every place we see). B) And simultaneously with the global unpacking, the "local locations" are packed (in the microstructure = in the microworld.) They are packed into matter !!!! They are packed (those dimensions) after the big bang into balls = elementary particles, and these are further packed into conglomerates, i.e. into atoms, molecules, into chemical-biological compounds. Etc, etc...etc, as I have described elsewhere over the years. According to physicists from Di Valentino's team, this anomaly could be explained if the expanding universe had a spherical shape. Which is even the same if the expansion is explained by the "unfolding" of this "initial" curvature of the space-time dimension in the Bang = in a state of arrest in which time begins to pass and expand = the space and time dimensions begin to unfold; this state of space-time of ultra-high curvature of the dimensions of time and length, is a plasma, is a state of foam. In this foam "vacuum boils", on Planck scales it acquires by deformation packing mini-localities = "frozen states" - wave spheres-wave packets that become elementary particles, our human concept, packets that manifest themselves with properties such as mass, spin, charge, etc., etc. (Each particle has a different number of packed dimensions with a different curvature of these; this determines their properties). Then such an initial state of the Universe, the space-time after the Big Bang, unfolds, expands "out" "from the singularity" and still, simultaneously further, collapses, "into itself", into matter. This means that there is a clustering, "combining" of matter elements, such as quarks, leptons, bosons, etc. into even more complex units, into baryons, resonances, then into atoms, then into molecules, into compounds - this is the "packing" of curved dimensions into packages, into more complex conglomerates, and this happens not only after the big bang, but that packaging continues to this day; proteins, DNA... We still have the Planck vacuum around us, "yesterday and today", continuously throughout the history of this! The Universe..,, all around us in the boiling vacuum of the Planck and subplanck scales, the same processes are taking place as they were a million years ago, as they were a billion years ago and 14.24 billion years ago right after the Big Bang. This entire "local universe" with curved dimensions is nested in a 3+3D grid, a grid of flat Euclidean dimensions. The universe "floats" in an infinite flat space-time. And at the same time, since the big bang, there has been (realized) the unfolding=unpacking and packing of dimensions. Both at the same time. What type of curve do we have for global unpacking, I don't know, probably a parabola, I thought about it 35 years ago...; This text was *twice "deformed" by a translation from Czech to English and back again to Czech and then once again to English..., I am very sorry for the complexity of the text, which I no longer feel like correcting.
@davex9506
@davex9506 2 роки тому
I wish I were smart enough to truly understand this stuff.
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 Рік тому
Same! But a retarded person might think "I wish I could understand the newspaper" We understand the newspaper, but it doesn't make us happier
@adamfattal9602
@adamfattal9602 Рік тому
Which stuff?
@kgbkaren2865
@kgbkaren2865 Рік тому
The example was helpful. I would’ve never understood all the philosophical explanations he was giving without it.
@rabiyahuda
@rabiyahuda Рік тому
Eric wienstien comments brought me here . 😊 🙏
@user-fi1jg4ln3b
@user-fi1jg4ln3b 8 місяців тому
If you listen to this carefully what he said is very deep connection between math and physic just very deep.
@dimjim9744
@dimjim9744 Рік тому
*inhales sharply for 11 seconds* NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
@aplacefaraway
@aplacefaraway Рік тому
i searched brown-nosing and this was the first result
@vaibhavdimble9419
@vaibhavdimble9419 Рік тому
He also has around 100000 citations..
@StevenLeeStudios
@StevenLeeStudios Рік тому
Name is crazyy
@qwertyzxcv123
@qwertyzxcv123 Рік тому
So disappointed that they didn't brought up Arithmetic in the conversation.
@ac-uk6hs
@ac-uk6hs Рік тому
This is why I love America so much. I'm in Iranian immigrants. And we came here and America gave us the opportunity to have someone like me become a physician. And it gave someone like him the opportunity to be a professor this is how stupid the government of Iran is they're losing all this brain power just like the Germans lost the Einsteins of the world Iran lost their best brains. And America was wonderful enough to accept us.
@user-oh9sz1dz9f
@user-oh9sz1dz9f 2 місяці тому
I like counting up to twenty ,slowly
@alltogetherplaytubefingerf6045
@alltogetherplaytubefingerf6045 Рік тому
don't go glassy-eyed, he is telling you about his epiphany using the type of approach Ed Witten demonstrated to him as an undergrad.
@avieus
@avieus 2 роки тому
String theory is a tenuous concept at best. Bridging the gap between the macro/cosmic world and quantum mechanics will require the collective effort of both theorists and practioners using what we already know from the Standard Model and making reasonable extrapolations from it.
@kerimw14v
@kerimw14v Рік тому
Amazing
@tkayuniverse3493
@tkayuniverse3493 Рік тому
Physics seems less straight forward than math, like a gathering of evidence to support a claim or a confluence of triggers that point to a general idea, rather than a precise numeric point or equation that can be tested and verified. Super interesting, always love the podcast and appreciate the guest!
@MadScientist512
@MadScientist512 Рік тому
XKCD made this point in a classic comic comparing maths, physics, chemistry and bibiology.
@98danielray
@98danielray Рік тому
"a precise numeric point or equation that can be verified" is literally way more the job of an experimental physicist than any mathematician. math proves proppositions about abstract structure. it has nothing to do with what you said, unless you mean what is generally attributed to "applied math" or, morw generally, "scientific computing"
@Walter5850
@Walter5850 Рік тому
When will you have Witten on?
@byronwilliams7977
@byronwilliams7977 Рік тому
I'm surprised there aren't any Podcasts with him on. Maybe he's busy working...
@gackerman99
@gackerman99 10 місяців тому
I know this isn't what he meant but I love the idea of mathematics as "applied physics", lmao
@smoozerish
@smoozerish Рік тому
Lex had no idea what this guy was talking about
@douglassduplassie6271
@douglassduplassie6271 Рік тому
Rogan podcast brought me here as well.
@getbendt2970
@getbendt2970 Рік тому
Have we determined the “frequency” of vibrating strings in string theory? Have we determined if strings vibrate in and out of a particular dimension. Perhaps the vibration frequency crosses multiple dimensions.
@zaurenstoates7306
@zaurenstoates7306 6 місяців тому
Edward Witten is your favorite physicists favorite physicist
@bobbyv3
@bobbyv3 Рік тому
Imagine if he decided to take a break from M-Theory for a little bit and shift focus to quantum information.
@tdogg6148
@tdogg6148 Рік тому
Rogans broadcast got me on this Witten rabbit hole
@elputas
@elputas 5 місяців тому
30-year stagnation in physics... SOMETHING STINKS HERE
@ConnoisseurOfExistence
@ConnoisseurOfExistence День тому
Nice!
@jimlahey5354
@jimlahey5354 Рік тому
What is the probability that Edward Witten beats Michael Jordan one on one?
@woodsidejaybro
@woodsidejaybro Рік тому
Depends on how personal Michael takes the challenge
@jaytorr6701
@jaytorr6701 Рік тому
​@@woodsidejaybroholy fuck, most underrated comment of the past 5 years. I think you are the Witten of comments dude! 😂
@woodsidejaybro
@woodsidejaybro Рік тому
@Jay Torr thanks! That's more than I deserve, but I'll take it.
@jaytorr6701
@jaytorr6701 Рік тому
@@woodsidejaybro you owe me half a can of coke zero that came through my nose when read your comment
@woodsidejaybro
@woodsidejaybro Рік тому
@Jay Torr fair trade, in my opinion.
@luigicantoviani323
@luigicantoviani323 Рік тому
Eddie is the Shepherd and Vafa and friends are the sheep that follow.....to a precipice.
@jaytorr6701
@jaytorr6701 Рік тому
Rogan. Yeap. Never heard of Witten and now I'm in a fucking foxhole.
@rossitherhodie5659
@rossitherhodie5659 Рік тому
I have ABSOLUTLY NO IDEA WHAT THESE BRILLIANT MINDS ARE TALKING ABOUT, BUT HELL IT SOUND GOOD. As soon as I thought I was getting somewhere, I lost it again. It a whole other world these guys live in. Going back to Biden babbeling on, which I also dont really understand but its a good Laugh😂😂😂❤
@CjJohnWynn
@CjJohnWynn Рік тому
Does Witten use chatgpt?
@asimplenight8220
@asimplenight8220 Рік тому
Lmao, nah. ChatGPT uses him.
@mattcero1
@mattcero1 Рік тому
A double major of math and physics at M.I.T?! That's the best you could do?! Come on man!
@UncommonSenz
@UncommonSenz Рік тому
Not me trying to understand what the hell is rigorous in maths 😂😂
@moart87
@moart87 Рік тому
He doesn’t explain clearly what makes something rigorous
@Kostly
@Kostly Рік тому
and what happened to Ed?
@barneycockburn
@barneycockburn Рік тому
Sorry- before all else, can we just confirm this guy’s name is “Cumrun?” This is coming from someone named “Barney Cockburn,” on my birth certificate. Does he have me beat?
@ironman4life89
@ironman4life89 Рік тому
If you have too good of a Cumrun you might start to feel your Cockburn. Honestly it's a tough call, I think you guys are tied
@johnnyq4260
@johnnyq4260 Рік тому
Physics lacks rigor, because it is in fact harder than math. The rules are dictated by Nature. Math is a game we invent, and the rules are designed by us. You don't have to work with someone like Witten to recognize the coherence of physics concepts. Any one who has read Landau & Lifshitz should be deeply impressed by it.
@lmiones
@lmiones Рік тому
Dr. Witten "paints and sculpts" new Math using Physics as a model, like a Michelangelo ... but there is a dire need for the reverse: use existing Math to advance Physics, like Einstein did with help from Grossmann ... or Feynman, without much "respect" for rigor, but with deep insight and new ideas ahead of the existing Math ...
@mattmarker1625
@mattmarker1625 Рік тому
Dude only has one button on his button up polo
@nephronpie8961
@nephronpie8961 2 роки тому
I do think having a Bachelor's in Arts (History and linguistics) degree made his approach to Physics and Math both elegant and unique. In other words, he brought to the table a lot more than someone with a Bachelor's in Science would.
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 Рік тому
I doubt they had any bearing whatsoever to his scientific work. Most physicists can and do read history. Steve Weinberg read Gibbon's "Decline and Fall" three times! Those disciplines only require literacy and a bit of basic verbal reasoning
@nephronpie8961
@nephronpie8961 Рік тому
@@edwardjones2202 I would pay more heed to the fact that he undertook entire 3 years of an arts degree, which is undoubtedly more rigorous than delving into literature occassionally and as a past time. But even that aside, his first degree being an arts degree very likely helped keeping his creative chakras open to work wonders for him during his later years as a physicist.
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 Рік тому
@@nephronpie8961 Theoretical physics and maths is intensely creative and rigorous. A history degree is not rigorous. History is amazing and interesting and I love it. History can be studied with more or less rigour, but it's not "rigorous", especially for someone like Witten. Lastly, undergraduate history is essentially clerical work: putting together information from existing sources and debates with a little elementary reasoning thrown in. Nothing that would have sharpened his analytical tools more than the simple learning of (never mind development of) math and physics.
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 6 місяців тому
​@@edwardjones2202😅😂😂 Rubbish. Go talk to a cognitive scientist with a PhD in physics (whose dad has a nobel prize in physics) like Douglas Hofstadter (inventor of the Hofstadter Butterfly) and he will tell you that you are WRONG. When neuroscientists studied Einsteins brain they noticed that his corpus callosum, the thin membrane that connects the left and right hemispheres of the brain (the so called arts/humanities part of the brain with the math/science part of the brain), was MUCH denser than the average human. Einstein famously read an insane amount of books - Shakespeare, Goethe (who he considered the greatest German intellect of all time - owned everything Goethe ever wrote), poetry, studied history, anthropology even. And psychometricians have pointed out that on the SAT scores of MANY Nobel Prize winners in the sciences they do exceptional well on verbal reasoning. So, no, you're wrong. Very wrong. Einstein read and understand Kants Critique of Pure Reason at the age of 12. That's hardly mathematics but requires a DENSE understanding of words and their referents. We are slowly but surely discovering that verbal reasoning feeds mathematical reasoning and vice versa. Language itself, is paradoxically a mathematical construct; but without language there is no mathematics. It's a chicken-egg question: which has greater primacy Literacy or Numeracy. My best conjecture, given what we know about Darwinian evolution, is that literacy came first. But if Max Tegmark's theory of the 'mathematical universe' turns out to be true then perhaps nature - and therefore everything - is fundamentally mathematical. Reading non mathematical books allows one to ANALOGIZE (read Hofstadter for more information on this). My 2 cents.
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 6 місяців тому
​@@nephronpie8961 Newton was VERY well read for his time on non-mathematical subjects. As was Leibniz. As was Descartes and Fermat. Einstein was VERY well read in philosophy, Shakespeare and Goethe and enjoyed reading books (he met and read Kafkas work) and playing the violin. I thoroughly believe Wittens DEEP understanding of history, politics (he is a Democrat and worked for McGovern), linguistics (a fascinating field in itself), literature gave him the cognitive seeds to be more creative in mathematics and physics, the same way it gave Einstein an edge over his contemporaries. Einsteins deep knowledge of Machian philosophy, and that of Hume, allowed him to see the equivalence principle which has been staring every human being in the face for thousands of years: A falling man does not feel his own weight. ANYBODY could've conceived of that, but it wasn't until Einstein. Einsteins ability to solve the tea lead paradox, another puzzle that was staring a lot of great minds in the face but they didnt solve, I think is yet another example of the benefits of an eclectic, variegated intellect. Well said! P.S. It's basically IMPOSSIBLE to get into an elite school like MIT or Princeton without both stellar verbal and math scores so I suspect, cognitively, the brain is invoking elements of both in neuroprocessing.
@dementor2003
@dementor2003 Рік тому
01:55 his life was impacted in a profound way by Mr Witten. He learned from Mr Witten the art of wasting time over a theory, which, either his "genius" mind truly couldn't grasp, or his "genius" mind couldn't accept it to be false and look for something else.
@David_7171
@David_7171 Рік тому
Alot of J’s have been top physicists
@trafyknits9222
@trafyknits9222 Рік тому
So let it be Witten, so let it be done.
@inoderlulzer5163
@inoderlulzer5163 4 місяці тому
I'm terrified of this man.
@mikeanonymous523
@mikeanonymous523 Рік тому
Eric's boogeyman
@KeyserSoseRulz
@KeyserSoseRulz Рік тому
OK I will disclose a secret to the world: Edward Witten is a alien, transported from Orion to earth to help us develop in Math.
@user-qw4zg2py9p
@user-qw4zg2py9p 7 місяців тому
私はモノポールブラックホールが存在すると思います。私はストリング理論は、一般的な関数と一般的な幾何学に還元されると予想します。私は光子に質量があると思います。
@tomalata5742
@tomalata5742 2 роки тому
Wow, didn't know Vafa was the one who conjectured the mirror symmetry
@knight3481
@knight3481 2 роки тому
Yeah! I thought it was Greene and Plesser
@shaun2617
@shaun2617 7 місяців тому
Sounds like blowing a lot of smoke to me. So Witten was his advisor, and they are both very smart guys I'm sure - just like anyone working at that level in physics or mathematics - but aside from the accolades and praises - what major problem in physics has Witten actually solved?
@ivankaramasov
@ivankaramasov 4 місяці тому
"Everybody else at that level." There is probably a handful if anyone at Witten's level.
@ballskin
@ballskin 2 дні тому
solved anomalies in QFT. quantum effects that violate classical symmetries. his work was crucial in the context of gauge theories and supersymmetric theories. not to mention BCFW recursion, topological quantum computing, etc. even if string theory is all nonsense, the mathematical tools and techniques developed in its pursuit have already proven to be valuable across several fields.
@nbelgium
@nbelgium Рік тому
wtf is this guy talking about at 7:16 🤣🤣
@youtubesucks1885
@youtubesucks1885 10 місяців тому
Mirror symmetry
@PaulNtabuyeButera
@PaulNtabuyeButera Рік тому
I am going to pretend I understood everything he said.
@pournima8096
@pournima8096 Рік тому
😂
@01slps
@01slps 6 місяців тому
when he started talking about physics, i just realized how dumb i am because i couldnt understand anything
@4specialist
@4specialist Рік тому
Well, duh...my thoughts exactly...😏
@RicardoDirani
@RicardoDirani 2 місяці тому
Eric Weinstein is terrified of this man
@stewarttomkinson3356
@stewarttomkinson3356 7 місяців тому
Call String theory is very convenient for physicist cause it can’t be proven or disproven
@ballskin
@ballskin 2 дні тому
this simply isn't true lmao
@raurmanproductions3438
@raurmanproductions3438 Рік тому
What has this genius produced?
@ivankaramasov
@ivankaramasov 10 місяців тому
Things you can't understand
@youtubesucks1885
@youtubesucks1885 9 місяців тому
I would also add never
@frank2428
@frank2428 Рік тому
rogan brought me here
@anthonyvillella4464
@anthonyvillella4464 Рік тому
These people's are good smart me like much ya
@OBGynKenobi
@OBGynKenobi Рік тому
I wonder why Eric Weinstein doesn't agree?
@stonehaven2289
@stonehaven2289 Рік тому
Because Eric Weinstein thinks He, himself is the smartest person in the world... Go watch some of Ed Wittens lectures and you'll see Weinstein is a moron in comparison to Witten😅 not even close... Ed Witten is considered one of the greatest minds in all of history... Do some research aside from String Theory...
@je25ff
@je25ff Рік тому
Cumrun..what an unfortunate translation in English.
@johnsummers1333
@johnsummers1333 Рік тому
... but string theory is donuts bro
@whodat122
@whodat122 Рік тому
Hold on this guys name is Cumrun? Bruh
String Theory Explained | Cumrun Vafa and Lex Fridman
16:32
Lex Clips
Переглядів 76 тис.
How brilliant was Einstein? | Andrew Strominger and Lex Fridman
7:36
Vasiliy Lomachenko vs George Kambosos | INTERNATIONAL LIVE STREAM
3:10:05
Top Rank Boxing
Переглядів 1,1 млн
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 8 млн
ISSEI funny story😂😂😂Strange World | Magic Lips💋
00:36
ISSEI / いっせい
Переглядів 110 млн
Edward Witten - Why the ‘Unreasonable Effectiveness’ of Mathematics
7:32
Genius of Ed Witten | Peter Woit and Lex Fridman
3:25
Lex Clips
Переглядів 190 тис.
Edward Witten: On the Shoulders of Giants
48:49
World Science Festival
Переглядів 316 тис.
Conversation: Salam, Sciama, Witten and Budinich
49:00
Int'l Centre for Theoretical Physics
Переглядів 353 тис.
Newton Medal winner (2010): Edward Witten
25:01
Institute of Physics
Переглядів 252 тис.
The genius of Edward Witten | Edward Frenkel and Lex Fridman
5:08
Lex Clips
Переглядів 125 тис.
Edward Witten - How is Mathematics Truth and Beauty?
6:37
Closer To Truth
Переглядів 212 тис.
Unzicker annoys string theorists by asking about Witten's responsibility
2:07
Unzicker's Real Physics
Переглядів 97 тис.
Dirac Conversation: Edward Witten
46:00
Int'l Centre for Theoretical Physics
Переглядів 95 тис.
What works did Edward Witten do?
19:59
Phymaths
Переглядів 162 тис.
How Neuralink Works 🧠
0:28
Zack D. Films
Переглядів 26 млн
iPhone 17 Slim - НЕ ОНОВЛЮЙ iPhone в 2024 | Новини Тижня
31:12
Канал Лучкова
Переглядів 35 тис.
Which Phone Unlock Code Will You Choose? 🤔️
0:14
Game9bit
Переглядів 6 млн
Apple, как вас уделал Тюменский бренд CaseGuru? Конец удивил #caseguru #кейсгуру #наушники
0:54
CaseGuru / Наушники / Пылесосы / Смарт-часы /
Переглядів 3,4 млн
Какой телефон лучше всего снимает? 🤯
0:42