The Next Presidential Jet: The New $5B "Biden Force One"

  Переглядів 2,193,282

Long Haul by Simple Flying

Long Haul by Simple Flying

3 роки тому

Air Force One is one of the most recognizable call signs in the world. It refers to any US military aircraft carrying the serving US President. For over 30 years, this has been associated with two modified 747-200 aircraft.
These are set to change soon, though, with two new 747-8 aircraft under development. Obama ordered these, Trump made several changes and savings, but it will be President Biden who gets to fly first on them.
What do we know so far about these exciting new aircraft?
Video source links:
Trump at desk inside AF1 • Primer viaje de Donald...
Air Force One • President Trump Air Fo...
Air Force One • Air Force One and SAM4...
AIR FORCE ONE • AIR FORCE ONE - US Air...
747 air force one VC-25 • Know Your Aircraft - V...
Air Force One 707 • President Reagan answe...
interior Air Force One • President Obama and Wi...
747-8 Unpainted • Unpainted 747-8F [N501...
747-8 assembly • 747-8 Freighter gets p...
747 Transaero • Landing EI-XLN Transae...
Transaero • All fleets of TRANSAER...
Photos:
Supersonic Air Force Ones: Exosonic & Hermeus
nara.getarchive.net/media/pre...
nara.getarchive.net/media/the...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_...
pxhere.com/en/photo/1139650
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
www.flickr.com/photos/gageski...
Simple Flying:
Visit our website where we publish 150-200 news stories per week: simpleflying.com/
Listen to our weekly podcast: simpleflying.com/podcast/
Download our iOS & Android app: simpleflying.com/simple-flyin...
Daily email digest sign up: simpleflying.com/daily-digest/
Check out our main UKposts channel: / @simpleflyingnews
Follow us on social media:
Instagram: / simpleflyingnews
Twitter: / simple_flying
Facebook: / simpleflyingnews
Linkedin: / 33222643
#aviation #flight #avgeek #airlines #flying
#Aviation #Flight #Avgeek #Flying

КОМЕНТАРІ: 3 100
@gilbert9394
@gilbert9394 3 роки тому
Airbus aren't stupid. They declined application because they knew it would never happen. The US president in a non American built jet would never fly😂
@starfivehd2758
@starfivehd2758 3 роки тому
Agree lol
@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek
@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek 3 роки тому
@Libturds Suck surely it should be the best jet available that fits the jobs
@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek
@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek 3 роки тому
@Libturds Suck yeah I know but for America it shouldn’t be fair enough it should be the best which is why I say airforce one should be a Cessna 172
@G-546
@G-546 3 роки тому
gilbert It was because the Air Force chooses planes by specifications like range, floor area, and maximum takeoff weight. The politicians who decide what the Air Force buys chose based on American jobs.
@kimjonglongdong3158
@kimjonglongdong3158 3 роки тому
Going by Boeing's recent record, he would likely have flown more! No takers? I'll see myself out...
@jcmount1305
@jcmount1305 3 роки тому
$5 Billion is the total PROGRAM COST, not the cost of the airplanes alone. Program cost is airframes, the modifications but also maintenance for a specified period of time. The Presidential aircraft are maintained on a 25% duty cycle for enhanced safety. Lets say a part is certified for 10,000 cycles on a commerical plane that part is replaced on the Presidential fleet at 2500 cycles. That enhanced safety regime is part of the Program Cost.
@Flyingmsdaisy
@Flyingmsdaisy Рік тому
Finally a fact. Thank you
@texaswunderkind
@texaswunderkind Рік тому
Don't let facts get in the way of a good antigovernmental rant by morons.
@dannyzero692
@dannyzero692 Рік тому
Thank you for this, so many people think that the government is wasting tax money on useless projects because the media told them so.
@78625amginE
@78625amginE Рік тому
Literally said that in the video...
@sgodsellify
@sgodsellify Рік тому
Still you can build an Aircraft carrier for around 5 billion.
@francishanna9999
@francishanna9999 2 роки тому
Air Force One should definitely keep the same color format, because it is one of the most recognizable color schemes in the world.
@JClark-34695
@JClark-34695 2 роки тому
The livery designed by Raymond Loewy and approved by Jacqueline Kennedy has flown the bodies of JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Reagan and George H. W. Bush. But Trump comes along and wants it changed to match his personal plane. If that doesn't prove to you what an egotistical, unpatriotic POS that man is, nothing will.
@RevJim-qc2ry
@RevJim-qc2ry 2 роки тому
Jackie's design is gone. Trump Force 1 will be more patriotic and appropriate.
@chrismathewsmerriman2144
@chrismathewsmerriman2144 2 роки тому
@@RevJim-qc2ry you just said it. That is nothing more than trying to copy his own pathetic failed airline paint scheme.
@acopeland8412z
@acopeland8412z 2 роки тому
Agree keep same colors.
@KO-pk7df
@KO-pk7df 2 роки тому
@@RevJim-qc2ry Don't mess with Airforce one colors alone!!! Besides we don't want any remembrance of Trump!
@lucaschneider1613
@lucaschneider1613 3 роки тому
“Biden force one” We aren’t calling the 747s the Bush force now, are we?
@aviationbossandguitar1034
@aviationbossandguitar1034 2 роки тому
Lol
@aviationbossandguitar1034
@aviationbossandguitar1034 2 роки тому
Trump came up with the new design idea anyway
@lucaschneider1613
@lucaschneider1613 2 роки тому
@@aviationbossandguitar1034 haha Im a bit on the fence about the design. It looks really good but you know we had the old design since forever.
@thesarge1969
@thesarge1969 2 роки тому
@@aviationbossandguitar1034 I like the OLD design better. Anything that trump think up is GARBAGE
@captainobvious6668
@captainobvious6668 2 роки тому
I think we should’ve kept the old livery since that would keep the tradition, but unfortunately Trump broke tradition like he always does.
@CollinKeegan
@CollinKeegan 3 роки тому
It seems a little weird to get rid of in-air refueling, isn't that basically essential in the event of a war or if there's mechanical problems on board?
@davidhoffman1278
@davidhoffman1278 3 роки тому
Yes, it is needed, but Trump did not do contingency planning or thoughtfulness very well.
@mikelowe5096
@mikelowe5096 3 роки тому
I would think that if a plane had mechanical problems, the last thing the crew would want to do is put more fuel in. They'll want to get on the ground.
@davidhoffman1278
@davidhoffman1278 3 роки тому
@@mikelowe5096 , Old USAF story of wanting more time to do airborne assessment and practice approaches at high altitude. They have refueled aircraft with problems to get them to better landing locations and to get more analysis time.
@alanmcneill2407
@alanmcneill2407 2 роки тому
It may be that mid-air refueling presents some danger with close proximity to another large aircraft, more danger than having to land to fuel up. The idea of having 4 engines does provide more saftey, I would think, I think they will continue with the 747 platform for years to come. They have outstanding performance for such a large plane.
@timh36
@timh36 2 роки тому
I guess they plan on relying on that doomsday air force one that is set up for use during war. I think there are several and are called E4b's. I remember during the 9/11 attacks there was talk of transferring president Bush to it. I think they are still around
@Crazyuncle1
@Crazyuncle1 3 роки тому
Actually that 5 billion buys 2 of them.
@jordanla6453
@jordanla6453 3 роки тому
The extra money is for the high tech security devices (like missles sensor) and internet, and direct phone calls
@MetroDoc-he8zd
@MetroDoc-he8zd 3 роки тому
@@jordanla6453 ...and don't forget the new hangar at Andrews for them.
@scarecrow108productions7
@scarecrow108productions7 3 роки тому
@@MetroDoc-he8zd yeah, considering the -8i's wingspan longer than her older sister flagships, the VC-25As (747-200B).
@apaulmcdonough2170
@apaulmcdonough2170 3 роки тому
Plus a New Hangar to house the two of them.
@mikeeagle2653
@mikeeagle2653 3 роки тому
@@jordanla6453 lol
@rayjames6096
@rayjames6096 2 роки тому
The Raymond Loewy designed livery is iconic and shouldn't be changed.
@KellysCanoeing
@KellysCanoeing Рік тому
No way will Biden keep Trump's paint scheme
@turkey0165
@turkey0165 Рік тому
Why because a Democrat 1st lady over 59 years ago help design the colors in Democrat Blue?
@KellysCanoeing
@KellysCanoeing Рік тому
@@turkey0165 the paint job is beautiful and iconic who cares about who was in power when it was created. everyone in the world knows what Air Force One looks like, changing it destroys the identity! What is next painting the Washington monument or changing the color of the white house to reflect the party of the president?
@turkey0165
@turkey0165 Рік тому
@Kelly Cornering Good story, now tell that to Brandon ! 😚
@iPhil77
@iPhil77 Рік тому
@@turkey0165 The military has already nixed the plan of the color scheme of Trump scheme. On the basis of the keeping the aircraft cooling from overheating etc. So it’ll be the same color scheme as originally designed.
@jim2lane
@jim2lane 2 роки тому
1:55 while it is true that the average life expectancy for a 747 is 30 years, that is for one kept in commercial service. These planes have MUCH less usage than one flying every day for an airline. They should be able to get twice, if not more than that from these planes
@aerospacecadet9781
@aerospacecadet9781 2 роки тому
Years isn't the only factor for aircraft lifespans.
@charlesbrownii5254
@charlesbrownii5254 2 роки тому
So did the space shuttles, But; communist Obama put the USA out of space force by canceling it.. Instead of better management of NASA's budgets...
@jim2lane
@jim2lane 2 роки тому
@@charlesbrownii5254 ok "Charles", I think you've had your fun for the day now, provoking the imperialist westerners 😒
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 2 роки тому
Government aircraft don't get much flight cycles, but these aircraft gets still older. Airlines move on with new engine types, and 747-200 engines are not common any more. Spare parts get more expensive (the - 400 got a major overhaul including new wings and new engines, and a new cockpit, and has technically little to do with the - 200). Also you can't simple park it like a car, aircraft are made for flying. The German government A 340s got unreliable because they have been used too little, they suffered from a lot of defects while Lufthansa was operating the same 340-300s without such problems and with a good reliability.
@birdsofafeather8368
@birdsofafeather8368 2 роки тому
@@charlesbrownii5254 Bush was the one that approved the retirement of the shuttles, Obama simply complied with it. Also the Space Shuttle was expensive and dangerous, and a deeply compromised design that NASA was happy to be rid of so it could focus on other projects, like Orion/SLS.
@JeffBraden01
@JeffBraden01 3 роки тому
I think that it will be painted in the original scheme like the previous aircraft. Its very recognizable!
@erolsen34k39
@erolsen34k39 3 роки тому
I hope that the planes are painted with the 60 year old iconic paint scheme.
@dartmaster501
@dartmaster501 3 роки тому
Yes, the livery will be the same.
@aigtrader2984
@aigtrader2984 3 роки тому
@@dartmaster501 Trump tried to change it to "his" plane colors .. ugh
@Dani-ln6sp
@Dani-ln6sp 3 роки тому
I thought the ability to refuel midair was a massive advantage of the jet, doesn't it seem like a big loss? I thought of it as a feature hopefully never to be used but the fact that it could gave power and security
@arcanondrum6543
@arcanondrum6543 3 роки тому
I believe that the refueling capability was in case of Nuclear War (but Bunkers, not aircraft, are where you should be). With US Bases almost everywhere and engines far more efficient than the engines on the current aircraft, it may not be necessary for refueling. If I were to bet money, I would guess that Mr. "Super Jenius" demanded to win a price negotiation so refueling was cut. I could be wrong but I'd place some coin on that bet if I could be sure to get the definitive answer on whether it was a factor.
@johnrossi2516
@johnrossi2516 3 роки тому
Dubbed " Moron one"
@conorcorrigan765
@conorcorrigan765 3 роки тому
AF1 has never mid-air refueled with POTUS on board, it was meant to be used in emergencies only, but it's not very practical in the modern era where a sub-launched ballistic missile could take out Andrews and the AF1 planes in under 10 minutes from 300+ miles away...
@Dani-ln6sp
@Dani-ln6sp 3 роки тому
@@arcanondrum6543 Fair point it's probably a change in strategy to go under ground rather than above which I could see making more sense
@Dani-ln6sp
@Dani-ln6sp 3 роки тому
@@conorcorrigan765 I suppose so but 300 miles really isn't that far either. Anti air has improved and it is where the Russians excel so maybe that's also why
@Burkutace27
@Burkutace27 3 роки тому
I really think it needs to be derived from the 747 again. There's just a presence and prestige to them you can't get from other Boeing models.
@latenightthinker4737
@latenightthinker4737 2 роки тому
Might just be me being a youngin, but I kinda seee the 747 as a grandma at this point, kinda like Queen Elizabeth
@latenightthinker4737
@latenightthinker4737 2 роки тому
Might just be me being a youngin, but I kinda seee the 747 as a grandma at this point, kinda like Queen Elizabeth
@latenightthinker4737
@latenightthinker4737 2 роки тому
Might just be me being a youngin, but I kinda seee the 747 as a grandma at this point, kinda like Queen Elizabeth
@harrietharlow9929
@harrietharlow9929 Рік тому
@@latenightthinker4737 HRH might be elderly, but she has staying power.
@harrietharlow9929
@harrietharlow9929 Рік тому
I agree. I've flown once on one and the flight was fabulous. The Boeing 747 and the L-1011 Tristar are my two favourite makes/models. and the 747 Airforce 1 is one beautiful plane. I hope they keep the present colour scheme. It's a powerful, yet understated look and shows undeniable good taste, Trumps colour scheme isn't bad but is still on the garish side.
@punchthedog
@punchthedog 3 роки тому
Boeing is due to deliver it's last commercial 747's in 2022, to Atlas Air. A cargo airline. If the new Air Force One's are delivered in 2024, the will be the last 747's ever made. Which I guess is a more fitting end to one of the most iconic aircraft ever to fly.
@Jack3md
@Jack3md 3 роки тому
The new air force one's are already a couple years old, originally to be delivered to a foreign carrier but canceled. The final atlas air 747's will be the last ones to roll out of the everett plant
@Randomvideos-zi7pe
@Randomvideos-zi7pe 2 роки тому
The vc-25b's uses 2 already built 747's. Plus the conversions is not at everett. They will just be the last delivered 747's.
@mitchyoung93
@mitchyoung93 8 місяців тому
Not for the vegetable we have in the White House now. It's a shame.
@philsaunter1956
@philsaunter1956 3 роки тому
I love the 707 design with the black nose. Looks so cool.
@zepter00
@zepter00 3 роки тому
Back in times black noses were because lack of radio wave transparent paints.
@renroth1
@renroth1 3 роки тому
I flew on the presidential 707 in 1976. It was cool to have a flight steward and living room type seating. My tdy was airforce entertainment so our group was designated air force vip even as an enlisted folk as we all were. Musicians never had it so good. Flight was only a couple of hours. No stewardesses and no alcohol, no photos just a great memory.
@stockleycat
@stockleycat 3 роки тому
The planes used as AF1 frequently practice touch and go landings at PHF. It is so neat to see the easily recognizable livery as it flys over Hampton Roads.
@theprophetez1357
@theprophetez1357 3 роки тому
I used to see them 5 days a week at Andrew's AFB.
@randybenne9968
@randybenne9968 3 роки тому
The Dover AFB Mobility Command Museum should be the final home for one of these aircraft.
@alexdarby3374
@alexdarby3374 3 роки тому
maybe uncle joe will send 'er home
@Aviation_Game
@Aviation_Game 3 роки тому
The National Airforce Museum needs to be as well.
@senseofstile
@senseofstile 2 роки тому
I have seen two of the former Air Force 1 planes. The one in Seattle and the one in Simi. The one in Simi Valley was stored in Riverside before it went there. I saw it in both places. Regarding the new ones lacking mid air fueling; I don't think they need it. Those planes can go 10,000 - 12,000 miles with full tanks.
@alaskan3304
@alaskan3304 2 роки тому
Not to mention the cost of having the system for upkeep etc. Just wasn’t a priority of items needed. Instead the monies that it would cost they have spent the money on something else.
@rasul407
@rasul407 3 роки тому
Jen Psaki was asked about the color of Air Force One. She said she’d get back to reporters. Any updates?
@senoJSR
@senoJSR 3 роки тому
she has to circle back
@rasul407
@rasul407 3 роки тому
@norman-m [KANDAGAIGO] aha! Yeah three years is a long time
@kennethkaser8356
@kennethkaser8356 3 роки тому
Pretty sure she circled back on that one.
@rmknicks
@rmknicks 3 роки тому
I heard it was touch and go
@pauldavis7334
@pauldavis7334 3 роки тому
With the Democrats on board it should be flying a Nazi symbol
@nthomasjr1
@nthomasjr1 3 роки тому
For those that have to fly and fight in the air, there's a very good reason to have four engines and mid-air refueling for the President's plane.
@phil20_20
@phil20_20 2 роки тому
Yeah, I think that was a mistake. I hope they put it back in the refit. He can't exactly catwalk across to the Doomsday Plane.
@ca6360
@ca6360 Рік тому
Senile 1... code name ... "The Big Guy"
@JamesAlexander14
@JamesAlexander14 Рік тому
@@ca6360 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@prabhatsourya3883
@prabhatsourya3883 Рік тому
You do have a point. Initially, I was thinking along the lines of a reconfigured Boeing 777 or the Boeing 787, because of their humongous ranges, but realised that 4 engines are needed for contingency purposes. It is the same reason that most of the presidential/diplomatic aircraft are 4 engined.
@billpugh58
@billpugh58 Рік тому
@@ca6360 Diaper 1 Trumps AF1
@myspotmyrules3048
@myspotmyrules3048 3 роки тому
Keep the livery the way is. It’s more recognizable all over the planet.
@donaldfedosiuk1638
@donaldfedosiuk1638 2 роки тому
And has the added virtue of not reminding us of Trump every time we see the aircraft.
@stevengalloway8052
@stevengalloway8052 2 роки тому
Keep the current color scheme. It's a memorial to the Kennedys, who decided it... 😏
@rpach3023
@rpach3023 2 роки тому
Yeah, don't trump it up.
@myspotmyrules3048
@myspotmyrules3048 2 роки тому
@@stevengalloway8052 much better than a memorial of the Trump’s. We had a lot of reasons to be proud of this country back then.
@JimmeShelter
@JimmeShelter 3 роки тому
Trump approved it at $4B. Biden added a diaper dispenser which jacked the price.
@elbob248
@elbob248 3 роки тому
Lame. Which is expected from a trump fanboy.
@JimmeShelter
@JimmeShelter 3 роки тому
@@elbob248 awwww. Thst hurt.
@unclefart5527
@unclefart5527 Місяць тому
About time someone pointed out the obvious. Biden has, and will have, nothing to do with it.
@dylanminett8552
@dylanminett8552 3 роки тому
Can we try and stop normalising this trend of calling every head of state’s private aircraft “(their name) force one”? It’s very irritating and inaccurate.
@aidanhowe1638
@aidanhowe1638 3 роки тому
I think you should leave the people who spend the time on these videos to decide that.
@dylanminett8552
@dylanminett8552 3 роки тому
@@nigelmarvin1387 Air Force One is the callsign for any aircraft which the president of the United States is on. Bearing in mind that the president exclusively travels on their VC-25’s then it’s acceptable to refer to those as Air Force One, but calling them Biden Force One just doesn’t make sense, and I think that has stemmed from when the media called the Royal Air Force A330MRTT which was painted into the United Kingdom livery “Boris Force One” which is even more bl**dy stupid because it has no link to the USAF, and isn’t even the plane for the prime minister of the UK, it’s first role when not being an aerial refueller is to transport the Monarch of the UK. Sorry for the rant but it’s infuriating how many people are misusing the “Air Force one” callsign.
@dylanminett8552
@dylanminett8552 3 роки тому
@EIon Musk actually the airframes were purchased from Boeing, originally built for a Russian airline which collapsed before they could be delivered, but yes hopefully Trump will be back in office for his second term in 2024.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 3 роки тому
@@dylanminett8552 Boris Farce One is a better discription.
@sylviaelse5086
@sylviaelse5086 3 роки тому
The approach to Airbus was never anything more than an attempt to keep Boeing honest.
@bertjilk3456
@bertjilk3456 3 роки тому
Key word being ‘attempt’....
@skipsassy1
@skipsassy1 2 роки тому
@@bertjilk3456 Boeing laughed at that insanity. What military contractor has ever delivered below cost?
@ghsf1234
@ghsf1234 2 роки тому
@@skipsassy1 Government contractor*. And everywhere, not only in the US. Governments always overpay. After all, they're not spending their own money. Little accountability.
@beaujaxe6937
@beaujaxe6937 3 роки тому
To the best of my recollection, no previous version of Air Force One has ever been referred to -- even informally -- by the name of an individual President. Why "Biden Force One" now?
@elizabethdillon4945
@elizabethdillon4945 2 роки тому
Beau-just a stupid way to start a controversy.
@compazine
@compazine 2 роки тому
That's what's called "Headline Hyperbole" - and it's something Long Haul knows very well.
@primicerius
@primicerius 3 роки тому
I grew up 30 minutes away from dc and most of the time I will get to see Blackhawks, Marine one, and Air force one fly over my city.
@joebarbjb6668
@joebarbjb6668 3 роки тому
The classic paint scheme was historic, it should never have been changed. The current paint looks like a common low budget airline.
@RevJim-qc2ry
@RevJim-qc2ry 3 роки тому
Goodbye to Jackie's color of weakness, that awful baby blue.
@raywei8472
@raywei8472 3 роки тому
Because it is, the color scheme is strikingly similar to a certain president's bankrupted airline
@daniel_sc1024
@daniel_sc1024 3 роки тому
I'm not opposed to a new paint scheme, but agree the current proposal looks rather ordinary.
@aviationbossandguitar1034
@aviationbossandguitar1034 2 роки тому
The new design is much more patriotic for America
@r1explode1
@r1explode1 2 роки тому
trumps new color scheme looks too much like Putin’s plane. The current scheme is ICONIC! It’s known around the world! We don’t need Putin Force Two
@dmav522
@dmav522 3 роки тому
getting rid of air-to-air refueling is a huge mistake.....
@sinkingisland7769
@sinkingisland7769 3 роки тому
Completely agree w/ Daniel Macphee.
@williamerazo3921
@williamerazo3921 3 роки тому
@@nigelmarvin1387 it’s a backup If there’s a nuke attack
@militaryav8r
@militaryav8r 3 роки тому
They bought already constructed planes. So they’d have to go back and retrofit it, and like Nigel says, it’s doubtful that they even use it now, so what would be the point. If you want to use it, you have to qualify your pilots (through both initial and recurring training) to use it. Plus… the bobbing and weaving of arial refueling is not the most comfortable experience to sit through. I know it makes many aircrew members sick and they do it for a living. They probably choose not to subject passengers to all of that if it isn’t necessary. The fewer sick passengers you have on the jet equates to the fewer sick passengers a maintainer has to clean up after.
@SouvikMukherjeeACFCOD
@SouvikMukherjeeACFCOD 3 роки тому
@@militaryav8r Tbh, almost all of the retrofit on a plane such as Air Force One is a "what-if" scenario. What if you need a second APU on the ground? What if you have missiles fired against you? What if you need to take of steeply? When you include all this, you should really have in-air refuelling.
@militaryav8r
@militaryav8r 3 роки тому
@@SouvikMukherjeeACFCOD none of what you mention involves additional pilot training requirements, the potential for damaging the aircraft in the process of that training, passenger discomfort… all for what gain? It’s a system that doesn’t seem to be used now anyways.
@nightlock-cf3br
@nightlock-cf3br 2 роки тому
I was at the USAF museum in Ohio today on got to see one of the former Air Force One's, even got to tour the interior
@952arnaldo
@952arnaldo 3 роки тому
the longstanding air force blue color scheme is classic with the Air Force.
@cskvision
@cskvision 3 роки тому
“Get off my plane”
@mudgatebronn4438
@mudgatebronn4438 3 роки тому
this will be the new Loilita express
@jaygee5693
@jaygee5693 3 роки тому
@@mudgatebronn4438 Projecting much? The first thought that popped into your head? Seek help before you start acting out your sick fantasy.
@thesarge1969
@thesarge1969 3 роки тому
@@mudgatebronn4438 Sorry, traitor trump is out of office
@imranbecks
@imranbecks 3 роки тому
Best action presidential movie ever!
@MagaPatriot1776
@MagaPatriot1776 3 роки тому
@@thesarge1969 Go wax Beijing bidens shitty Chevy. President Trump still uses the beast while your guy is in a Chevy fresh out of cash for clunkers.
@markwharton5438
@markwharton5438 3 роки тому
Keep the traditional livery. It is classic and looks awesome. Why mess with perfection!
@definitely_notme4112
@definitely_notme4112 3 роки тому
Yes. Especially because JFK chose it for the old 707 Air force one, so it is sort of a tribute to keep it.
@mikeb8436
@mikeb8436 3 роки тому
I say move on to something new. Why live in the past?
@WAL_DC-6B
@WAL_DC-6B 2 роки тому
Trump's color scheme proposal for the next Air Force One looks too much like a discount airline's livery. Keep Raymond Loewy's classic design or perhaps modify it a little.
@wongtong754
@wongtong754 2 роки тому
Because it’s ugly and boring.
@zdwade
@zdwade 2 роки тому
I like the new one. The other one is old.
@scottydont2549
@scottydont2549 2 роки тому
The new livery isn’t bad, but the classic livery is iconic. Plus we have other planes that use that scheme as well.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 2 роки тому
The new livery looks a little bit like the livery of the German government aircraft, even the new A 350s have this oldschool livery with the color strip running straight around the aircraft. In my opinion the classic AF1 livery looks more modern than the new one.
@kennysntv
@kennysntv 3 роки тому
Will there be an emergency pod in it like in Air Force 1 or escape from NY
@slappymcgillicuddy7532
@slappymcgillicuddy7532 3 роки тому
no, they have said that is not real
@cadenc4693
@cadenc4693 3 роки тому
I wonder if there will be a president eject system like the movie Air Force One
@johnp139
@johnp139 3 роки тому
I’m afraid that’s classified.
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 3 роки тому
Hitler had one!
@aviationnation5997
@aviationnation5997 3 роки тому
@@oxcart4172 Oh yeah I remember. His own chute!
@melvinelder3587
@melvinelder3587 3 роки тому
No that's not possible 😂
@jordanla6453
@jordanla6453 3 роки тому
DT stated he talked to the Pentagon, and they told him "apparently" that's too much revealing to terrorists and to expensive to add to a stored aircraft, that would be cool tho
@thetransplanner
@thetransplanner 3 роки тому
There’s no way that new livery will ever be used. Nobody’s letting HIM design AF1.
@SSK-ws2gl
@SSK-ws2gl 3 роки тому
I bet you think he cheated into office XD
@aerohk
@aerohk 3 роки тому
Boeing! Quick, paint the jet now. Then charge Biden for changing to rainbow livery.
@ytnsanw
@ytnsanw 3 роки тому
@EIon Musk His second consecutive jail term...
@gavrielmusheyev141
@gavrielmusheyev141 3 роки тому
@@ytnsanw no his second presidential term
@godzillaplayz7777
@godzillaplayz7777 3 роки тому
@@aerohk lol
@kevinb3812
@kevinb3812 2 роки тому
I like the idea of having at least one supersonic airplane accessible to the President! Boom Supersonic, are you up for the task? It would make quite an entrance!
@christopherbriggs9526
@christopherbriggs9526 2 роки тому
Everything a president can do in person he can also do in a phone call or virtual meeting.
@binomesprite7829
@binomesprite7829 Рік тому
@@christopherbriggs9526 You can't hold the Saudi glowing ball.
@brucehunter1124
@brucehunter1124 3 роки тому
The livery will stay as it is currently
@matthewhouse2528
@matthewhouse2528 2 роки тому
Absolutely. Trump’s proposed livery wasn’t as gaudy or hideous as I expected, but nothing beats the current design. Why fix what isn’t broken?
@paulroling1781
@paulroling1781 3 роки тому
As I understood at the time, Airbus was very pissed of at the biased tanker selection of the B767 over the A330 and decided not to put a bid in. They concluded their bid would only be used to lower Boeings price and would not thus be worth their effort.
@outaouaishockey
@outaouaishockey 3 роки тому
Airbus is just not good tbh. I used an Airbus simulator. The side stick tho is just the single piece of trash that bugged me so much
@deeser
@deeser 3 роки тому
@@outaouaishockey But that's just you not getting used to it. 1000s of pilots who fly them daily would disagree with you.
@ToX1CPlayer
@ToX1CPlayer 3 роки тому
@@outaouaishockey so every Airbus is the same? I highly doubt that
@BryanHobbsMcCalister
@BryanHobbsMcCalister 3 роки тому
There were many reasons why Airbus did not bid. One major reason was Airbus was not willing to cooperate on security. And two the USA government wanted it built on American soil.
@Elliott2001
@Elliott2001 3 роки тому
@@BryanHobbsMcCalister airbus is also funded by foreign goverments, which is a security threat.
@stevencramsie9172
@stevencramsie9172 3 роки тому
Fortunately, it will almost certainly end up in the beautiful current paint scheme, not the proposed "update" that harkened back to the last one TWA had before they went bankrupt.
@wilkgr
@wilkgr 3 роки тому
What is TWA, sorry?
@stevencramsie9172
@stevencramsie9172 3 роки тому
@@wilkgr Trans World Airlines
@wilkgr
@wilkgr 3 роки тому
@@stevencramsie9172 Ohh I see, thank you!
@dartmaster501
@dartmaster501 3 роки тому
It will be the same.
@grannygrammar6436
@grannygrammar6436 3 роки тому
Bankrupt? That red stripe is borrowed from the Trump Shuttle. Not quite bankrupt: Trump bought it for $350 million, sold it for $150 million. You know, very stable genius stuff.
@glennquagmire3258
@glennquagmire3258 2 роки тому
Jackie is credited with the color scheme but it was done to help the plane blend in with the sky depending on the angle it could be viewed from. I think Vanta Black would be cool for absorbing radar waves. But, it would get extremely hot. I like the idea of Boom making a presidential supersonic jet.
@camerond9885
@camerond9885 Рік тому
You dont know how Air planes cool down do you ?
@tomclayton6875
@tomclayton6875 Рік тому
Hard to believe the current models only have one APU. In almost every disaster type crash it seems the APU is put out of commission in half of them and is mandatory for controls to landing the plane.
@michaelskinner7825
@michaelskinner7825 Рік тому
Secondary APU's are redundant on commercial aircraft due to the passive redundancy provided by the RATs these days. The Ram Air Turbine is plenty adequate for emergency power.
@johnkeating362
@johnkeating362 3 роки тому
The original color scheme was created by industrial designer Raymond Loewy. It has changed slightly through the years as new aircraft were delivered. Many think that the Kennedy 707 was the first and only 707 until the new 747 based Air Force One was delivered, there were 2 others. You can see subtle changes upon each delivery. The livery for the new jets to be delivered in 2024 should stay the same. It is instantly recognizable as Air Force One, and has always represented the United States well. As far as which presidential libraries should be given the 2 jets available, George W Bush, And Barack Obama should, in my opinion be selected since they had the jets for 2 eight year terms.
@kyle381000
@kyle381000 Рік тому
@@homelessnomad101 Fair enough. What is your point?
@andynicolson1057
@andynicolson1057 3 роки тому
Fitting a Stennah stairlift would be mission critical.
@UpsheetscreekWOapaddle
@UpsheetscreekWOapaddle Рік тому
Is that for your use?😒
@jet4926
@jet4926 2 роки тому
Any information on the AF 1 is good..
@zachg9065
@zachg9065 Рік тому
Interesting that they are not including the mid ear refueling. I would like to see the classic livery used with maybe a few minor tweaks.
@benscampers1818
@benscampers1818 3 роки тому
Leg Hair Force One
@AshikJonathan
@AshikJonathan 3 роки тому
@@bilalrashid5355 Leg hair is manliness. how dare you insult it
@benscampers1818
@benscampers1818 3 роки тому
@@bilalrashid5355 learn definitions of words before you throw them around please
@johnpearson8784
@johnpearson8784 3 роки тому
@@bilalrashid5355 lighten up
@adamfpv8294
@adamfpv8294 3 роки тому
@@bilalrashid5355 cornpop was a bad dude, plus minorities don’t know how to use the internet.
@conorcorrigan765
@conorcorrigan765 3 роки тому
@@bilalrashid5355 Making fun of the President is bigotry now, please stop punching down.
@gibu002
@gibu002 3 роки тому
I had a couple different opportunities to see the current 747 Air Force One aircraft. In my younger days I was in Salina Kansas when these jets were being tested while still in their bright green primer paint. They did several touch and goes while I was on the ramp near by. Very impressive, especially to the young kid I was then. More recently President Obama made a visit to the small town where I now live so I got to see one of them pretty close again at my town's small little airport but now of course in full livery. Again, very impressive to the old guy I am now.
@baliharsingh2315
@baliharsingh2315 Рік тому
Bless you
@mkkl1170
@mkkl1170 2 роки тому
In an interview years ago with A group of ex presidents. The interviewer asked what the best part of being president was. Bill Clinton answered with the agreement of the others, “ it’s that damn plane”!
@dhruv6373
@dhruv6373 3 роки тому
If they are telling us all this, I wonder what they are not telling us.
@Vbbv22
@Vbbv22 3 роки тому
Yeah, you’re a real fucking deep thinker huh
@davidhawkshaw4542
@davidhawkshaw4542 3 роки тому
That everything is reliant on a 13 amp fuse somewhere probably.
@Veritas-invenitur
@Veritas-invenitur 3 роки тому
@@davidhawkshaw4542 🤣👌
@WorksOnMyComputer
@WorksOnMyComputer 3 роки тому
Each 747 will feature a MacBook capable of connecting to an alien mothership and disabling it.
@daniel_sc1024
@daniel_sc1024 3 роки тому
It has a Romulan cloaking device.
@bd5av8r1
@bd5av8r1 3 роки тому
Air Force 1 is a CALLSIGN, not a jet. :)
@ultra_01
@ultra_01 3 роки тому
its also a shoe :)
@julianjoseph5033
@julianjoseph5033 3 роки тому
@@ultra_01 lmao
@JaxomUK
@JaxomUK 3 роки тому
Any Aircraft carrying the President has the call Sign Air Force One and any Helicopter has the call Sign Marine One.
@alaskan3304
@alaskan3304 2 роки тому
@@JaxomUK bush even had a jet that had the call sign of Navy 1 on his flight to the vessel he flow to. Think he was the one who even flew the aircraft himself. Long time ago and can’t remember all the details.
@JaxomUK
@JaxomUK 2 роки тому
@@alaskan3304 I remember that and I do believe he did fly it but left the landing to the pilot as catching that wire isn't easy
@philipmelcheck4565
@philipmelcheck4565 2 роки тому
Why would the midair refueling capability be changed?
@CurvedGD
@CurvedGD 2 роки тому
a380 for AirForceOne would be epic
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179 3 роки тому
List of BBJ747-8i; 1. Oman: A4O-HMS, 2. China: B-2480 3. Brunei: V8-BKH 4. Morocco:CN-MBH (ex A6-PFA) 5. Turkey: TC-TRK (ex VQ-BSK) 6. Qatar: A7-HBJ 7. Qatar: A7-HHE 8. Qatar A7-HHF (ex A6-PFB) 9. Kuwait: 9K-GAA 10. Saudi: HZ-HMS1 11. South Korea: HL-7643 12. Boeing: N828BA The upcoming Air Force One/ VC-25B (ex Transaero): 13. USA: N894BA (ex EI-MOW) 14. USA: N895BA (ex EI-TSO) 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 List of ACJ350; 1. 10+03 A350-900; German Luftwaffe "Kurt Schumacher" 2. 10+04 A350-900; German Luftwaffe 3. D-AKAY; K5-Aviation 4. EC-NOI; World2Fly Spain 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 List of ACJ340-600; 1. Azerbaijan; 4K-AI08 2. Sky Prime; HZ-SKY 3. Air X Charter; 9H-FFC 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 List of ACJ340-500 1. Saudi Royal Flight; T7-SAU 2. Qatar Amiri Flight; A7-HHH 3. Royal Thai Air Force; HS-TYV 4. Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force); I-TALY 5. Turkey; TC-CAN (ex: TS-KRT) 6. Algeria; 7T-VPP 7. Kuwait; 9K-GBA 8. Kuwait; 9K-GBB 9. Las Vegas Sands Corporation; VP-BMS 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 List of Special 747SP; 1. A9C-HAK; Bahrain Royal Flight (ex; A6-ZSN) 2. VQ-BMS; Las Vegas Sands (ex; A9C-HMH) 3. VP-BLK; Las Vegas Sands (ex; A992MS & A6-SMR) 4. VP-BAT; CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing (ex; Worldwide Aircraft Holding) 5. P4-FSH; Ernest Angley Ministries (ex; A6-SMM) 6. A4O-SO; Oman Royal Flight 7. C-FPAW, Pratt & Whitney flying testbed 8. N747A; NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center 9. N747NA; NASA SOFIA 10. HZ-HM1B; Saudi Royal Flight 11. HZ-HM1C; Saudi Royal Flight 12. HZ-AIF; Saudi Royal Flight 13. YI-ALM; Iraq 14. C-GTFF; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services 15. C-FPAW; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 List of Government & Private 777; 1. 4K-AI001 777-200LR; Azerbaijan 2. S2-AHM 777-300ER; Bangladesh 4. TR-KPR 777-200; Gabon 5. VT-ALV 777-300ER; Air India One 6. VT-ALW 777-300ER; Air India One 7. PK-GIG 777-300ER; Indonesia Presidential Flight 8. YI-AQZ 777-200LR; Iraq 9. 80-1111 777-300ER; Japan Air Self Defence Force 10. 80-1112 777-300ER; Japan Air Self Defence Force 11. HZ-MF9 777-300ER; Saudi Arabian Government 12. EZ-A777 777-200LR; Turkmenistan 13. A6-ALN 777-200ER; UAE Presidential Flight (ex; VP-BRH) 14. A6-SIL 777-300ER; UAE Presidential Flight 15. N777UK 777-200ER; Bank Of Utah/ Access Industries 16. VP-CAL 777-200LR; Prince Mohammed bin Fahd al Saud 17. P4-SKN 777-200LR; Equatorial Guinea 18. P4-XTL 777-200LR; Comlux Aruba/Crystal Skye 19. N777AS 777-200ER; Mid-East Jet 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 List of BBJ787; 1. A6-PFC 787-8; UAE Presidential 2. A6-PFE 787-9; UAE Presidential 3. A6-PFG 787-9; UAE Presidential 4. A6-PFH 787-9; UAE Presidential 5. P4-787 787-8; Comlux Aruba 6. XC-MEX 787-8; Mexico 7. N507BJ 787-8; South Korea 8. N947BA 787-8; TVPX Trust Services 9. HZ-MF7 787-8; Saudi Ministry of Finance & Economy 10. HZ-MF8 787-8; Saudi Ministry of Finance & Economy 11. 2-DEER 787-8; Royal Jet 12. P4-BDL 787-8; Global Jet Luxembourg 13. V8-OAS 787-8; Brunei 14. UK001 787-8; Uzbekistan 15. N8906W 787-9; Wilmington Trust Company 16. N8903W 787-9; Wilmington Trust Company 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫 #AvGeek 🛫🤓
@AJNpa80
@AJNpa80 2 роки тому
Ernest Angley ministries! I'm choking over here. Know where the money is, great tax laws, legal con artists, can remember him on the TV from when I was a kid, whining, sniveling weasel. Many more like him. Well God said send me money too or he'll strike me dead! If you send it you'll be enriched 10 fold... A sucker born every minute.
@user-dc4bl1cu2k
@user-dc4bl1cu2k 9 місяців тому
You missed United Arab Emirates government BBJ747-8 but nice list otherwise.
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179
@stradivarioushardhiantz5179 9 місяців тому
@@user-dc4bl1cu2k both were transferred to Morocco & Qatar
@Donity
@Donity 3 роки тому
Please don't change the color scheme. The air force one livery is amazing as it is
@Jemz35
@Jemz35 3 роки тому
Its time for a change people will like it over time
@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek
@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek 3 роки тому
i think it should look bland so nobody could tell what plane it is
@kentfrederick8929
@kentfrederick8929 3 роки тому
The livery goes back to 1962. In that time, Delta changed it's livery 4 times. United changed its livery 5 times. American changed its livery 3 times. It's an iconic livery, but the colors are very 1960s. Further the up-sweep of the sky blue looks fine on the 707. But, it's never looked right on the 747 with the upper deck. My only problem with the new livery is that the flag on the tail is a little too big. It just comes across as too "in your face."
@13lochie
@13lochie 3 роки тому
@@kentfrederick8929 Too in your face? Mate its the Americans. Their president has his own Jet for fucks sake. The size of the flag is as obnoxious as everything else.
@Donity
@Donity 3 роки тому
@@13lochie :D
@gmb858
@gmb858 2 роки тому
went through 27000 at the Reagan library- 707. One word? cramped. Packed like sardines. The presidential "office" is about the size of a postage stamp. The "bed" reminded me of a small two cushion love seat. I contemplated a trip from Washington to Moscow like Nixon and Reagan took using 707's. While looking around, I started feeling claustrophobic. I suppose that is one of the hazards of being commander in chief.
@Madenity
@Madenity 2 роки тому
i hope the Air Force One paint wont change because I like the current one
@wingsontheat7188
@wingsontheat7188 3 роки тому
Years ago, changed from "Andrews AFB" to "Joint Base Andrews"
@commanderdoof9696
@commanderdoof9696 3 роки тому
The a380 would never be a Air Force plane because resin number one [ITS NOT MADE IN AMERICA]
@jaso5114
@jaso5114 3 роки тому
Well it's limited to what airports it could fly into and besides that, it's an ugly looking aircraft
@titanicbigship
@titanicbigship 3 роки тому
It also looks ugly with the livery
@commanderdoof9696
@commanderdoof9696 3 роки тому
I don’t think boring parts are made in china
@commanderdoof9696
@commanderdoof9696 3 роки тому
Boeing I mean
@nick4506
@nick4506 3 роки тому
@Night Rider most parts cant come from china or the planes would have a massive tariff. my father used to work for a Boeing contractor in la. also, imagine trying to get any quality control from china to comply with faa regulations ,it ain't gonna happen
@Head_of_the_Table2.0
@Head_of_the_Table2.0 3 роки тому
I think the information you are telling us is like 10% of the the whole thing so I think good stuff that's amazing
@duff4518
@duff4518 2 роки тому
I would doubt that when it rolls out it doesn't have mid air refueling
@johnp139
@johnp139 3 роки тому
This has been the most accurate coverage of VC-25B that I have seen!!!
@CausticLemons7
@CausticLemons7 3 роки тому
I heard nothing of the refrigerators...
@nin6246
@nin6246 3 роки тому
Building an Airbus for Air Force One would have been absolutely asinine - I'm glad that's not going to happen. Nothing against Airbus but Air Force One needs to be American made.
@louiscypher4186
@louiscypher4186 2 роки тому
It would have been American made, regardless of whether it went to Airbus or Boeing.
@Noneurbidnez
@Noneurbidnez 2 роки тому
As a pilot who has flown both, Airbus is a better product. But nothing is more beautiful than a 747.
@grallonson
@grallonson Рік тому
"this is so expensive" *wants the interior to be much more lavish.*
@madman671000
@madman671000 Рік тому
I think but I am not sure, you can retro fit an AR system into an existing airframe.
@nicholasmaude6906
@nicholasmaude6906 3 роки тому
The two current VC-25As desperately need to be replaced because they're getting old.
@chrissmith7669
@chrissmith7669 2 роки тому
Spares are becoming hard to find.
@calkinsb0713
@calkinsb0713 3 роки тому
Revert the livery color scheme back to the original
@mickfunny4185
@mickfunny4185 3 роки тому
@calkinsb0713 yeah the Trump Shuttle livery has to go
@jobe457
@jobe457 2 роки тому
The trump one is ugly.
@kevinnaber790
@kevinnaber790 Рік тому
Is the cost per plane and does it include ready spares (consumable parts such as motors, engines, flight control surfaces, tires)? Glad that they didn’t go with an Airbus, as too many parts are European and a military aircraft as with any vehicle benefits greatly from domestic abilities to supply it.
@jaybee9269
@jaybee9269 2 роки тому
Hardened fuselage shell? So basically rebuilding the thing from scratch. And don’t mess with the Raymond Loewy paint scheme.
@ScreaminEmu
@ScreaminEmu 3 роки тому
Will be fun to see how badly Boeing screws this one up. The KC-46 tanker (based on a 40 year old design) is years and years behind schedule and almost completely unusable until at least 2023. Our defense industry, from ships to jets, is an absolute joke anymore.
@piedmontrailfan81
@piedmontrailfan81 2 роки тому
…i don’t know where you’re getting this info and at this point I’m too afraid to ask..
@joshuab77829
@joshuab77829 2 роки тому
I will say how business is conducted in the defense industry is a joke. It would be nice to see someone like Elon musk come in and change the industry like he has with the space industry
@grp7112
@grp7112 2 роки тому
Present day Boeing could screw up a one-car funeral. A one-time fan of BA, who actively sought flights on their birds, I can now say honestly I would rather fly on an Airbus - and I reached that conclusion long before the 737MAX sh*t show.
@jeffherdz
@jeffherdz 2 роки тому
Boeing screw-ups are cheap when compared to the cost of the U.S.S Gerald R Ford CVN -78 and the money hungry at Newport News ship builders.
@GrinerB
@GrinerB Рік тому
@@joshuab77829 Elon is an idiot... But it would be very on brand for him to enrich himself with tax payer money... He wouldn't survive the regulation environment required to make a commercial plane.. There is no suing the regulators who enforce safety requirements for planes that fly over America... He's already causing road deaths by lying about "auto-pilot" then faulting his stans for letting his overpriced cars self drive them into accidents and death.
@TickleSalty
@TickleSalty 3 роки тому
In 1961, Jackie Kennedy enlisted the services of famed industrial designer Raymond Loewy to design a new livery for Air Force One. His design remains to this day. After 60 years, the design looks as fresh as ever and should never be altered.
@myspotmyrules3048
@myspotmyrules3048 3 роки тому
Indeed.
@aigtrader2984
@aigtrader2984 3 роки тому
100% AGREE
@robertblack7352
@robertblack7352 3 роки тому
100% Disagree. Red White and Blue.
@DerCharacter
@DerCharacter 3 роки тому
@@robertblack7352 Should we repaint Marine 1 and the beast while we’re at it? Just shove red white and blue every where we possibly can? Sometimes it’s okay to not have something that uses those colors.
@robertblack7352
@robertblack7352 3 роки тому
@@DerCharacter AF1 is special. I really love the new livery look.
@haquekhan4271
@haquekhan4271 2 роки тому
If they keep the traditional livery, the should modernize it a bit.
@schitflowsdwnhil
@schitflowsdwnhil 3 роки тому
It's definitely not "Biden Force One". Just "Air Force One" when POTUS is aboard.
@phil20_20
@phil20_20 2 роки тому
Big Jim says, "yassa you right boss!"
@karlzimmer683
@karlzimmer683 2 роки тому
So easily triggered?
@bogbog
@bogbog 3 роки тому
1.) 5 billion is cheap considering that includes two units as well as testing and the hanger. 2.) They should have kept the refueling system. 3.) The older livery looks better than the mind-blowingly antique looking livery Trump suggested. 4.) However i think the older livery isn't all that great either. 5.) They should cut down on the additional expenses to make it more luxurious and redirect those savings to make the craft more secure and advanced.
@dumdumbrown4225
@dumdumbrown4225 2 роки тому
That’s the best comment I’ve seen here 👍🏽
@ca6360
@ca6360 Рік тому
Imagine had they finished the wall? Resources already spent would have paid for this project
@lonwaslien104
@lonwaslien104 3 роки тому
I don’t like the proposed new livery. It’s way too commercial and resembles past TWA and USAirways liveries.
@bonnyd.5334
@bonnyd.5334 3 роки тому
It's Trump Trash Livery.
@djmaciiii
@djmaciiii 3 роки тому
It looks Russian.
@Peichen01
@Peichen01 3 роки тому
The new livery is classy ocean liner scheme while the baby blue is 60’ French
@TheGamingNorwegian
@TheGamingNorwegian 3 роки тому
That livery is the livery trumps failed airline used... Thats the only reason he wanted it on air force 1...
@Peichen01
@Peichen01 3 роки тому
@@TheGamingNorwegian That livery is the one on SS America, SS United States, SS Normandie, RMS Queen Elizabeth
@magicaleditz
@magicaleditz 2 роки тому
If the 747X existed, I would want that as Air Force One.
@tdodge29
@tdodge29 2 роки тому
8:57 as far as the livery or color scheme goes, I would stick with the traditional blue/white colors and paint job design but with some minor red color incorporated into it
@blackbriarmead1966
@blackbriarmead1966 3 роки тому
dang, it's pretty cool that an aircraft might get retired 2 miles away from me.
@happytomeetyou2047
@happytomeetyou2047 2 роки тому
I thought all retired Air Force ones go to Wright Patt Air Force base in Dayton, Ohio.
@DavidJ909
@DavidJ909 3 роки тому
KEEP THE TRADITIONAL PAINT SCHEME.
@superstarmcgee1128
@superstarmcgee1128 2 роки тому
Boo crap green sux!
@mtmac57
@mtmac57 2 роки тому
Does it have MCAS???
@mikeriesco6174
@mikeriesco6174 3 роки тому
Should keep in-flight refueling (seems idiotic to remove that), and should have a presidential escape pod. Worked for Harrison Ford, so good enough for any president.
@amorosogombe9650
@amorosogombe9650 3 роки тому
I hope Biden keeps the traditional livery. It's classy.
@lewishawkins5085
@lewishawkins5085 3 роки тому
I’m not American I’m British and I’m a fan of the Air Force one Plane I don’t like the New Livery It should stay the same as it is now
@HeidiKohne
@HeidiKohne 3 роки тому
I agree. Maybe tweak it a little, but I like the color scheme.
@collinoverby68
@collinoverby68 3 роки тому
They need to change the blue to match the flag and add some red
@DerCharacter
@DerCharacter 3 роки тому
@@collinoverby68 Eh, I kind of prefer it to look different to the flag. Marine one is green and white, Air Force one is blue and white.
@voxpopuli8957
@voxpopuli8957 3 роки тому
I do wish they keep the Jackie Kennedy livery, rather than switch them over to what kinda looks like a flying toothpaste container.
@HeidiKohne
@HeidiKohne 3 роки тому
Love your description!!
@rasul407
@rasul407 3 роки тому
💯 percent!
@voxpopuli8957
@voxpopuli8957 2 роки тому
@Anthony Martin (You’re being sarcastic, right? Cause otherwise, first of all, what the heck, and second of all, pardon?)
@norfolksouthernrailworks1543
@norfolksouthernrailworks1543 2 роки тому
@@voxpopuli8957 it is a very pretty livery, but the US, just all other things american, are not changing, and we need to have an updated paint job. I'm good for even solid white with striped tail and rear fuselage, or a simplified American airforce style Boeing House Livery. The current scheme is 60 years old. Showing up in a new livery will show the world we are progressing, not staying in the past.
@voxpopuli8957
@voxpopuli8957 2 роки тому
@@norfolksouthernrailworks1543 I don’t really see how this will change our image to the world. If other nations really notice the change, it may just as easily show to them that Trump, who is deeply unpopular among all of our allies, had an impact. I doubt they will see any meaning behind it as American progressing, just based upon which administration created and designed the new style.
@oxtinposs9451
@oxtinposs9451 Рік тому
I think a B777X would be a cool replacement for the Air Force One 😊
@veowsaku
@veowsaku 2 роки тому
787 would have been a world class platform for world leaders
@justaawake6273
@justaawake6273 3 роки тому
Where's my stimulus check 😠❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓
@maxeeboi1300
@maxeeboi1300 3 роки тому
never gonna come, you see the dems steal your votes like that
@fargonianproductions2767
@fargonianproductions2767 3 роки тому
They’ll start to come out around late February to early March
@maxeeboi1300
@maxeeboi1300 3 роки тому
@@fargonianproductions2767more than half will be for foreign countries
@NortheastIndiaindetails
@NortheastIndiaindetails 3 роки тому
@@maxeeboi1300 how so
@maxeeboi1300
@maxeeboi1300 3 роки тому
@@NortheastIndiaindetails You never k now where does gender studies money goes O_O
@timkearns3779
@timkearns3779 3 роки тому
Does this one come with an escalator?
@morganoox3838
@morganoox3838 Рік тому
The fitout cost ten times what the jet cost to build? Does it shoot down nuclear missiles or what?
@davewalker9926
@davewalker9926 2 роки тому
Mid-air refueling might seem essential but a standard 747-8 can fly for 17-18 hours with regular fuel capacity and perhaps much longer if it was attempting to stay aloft and not trying to get to a specific destination - flying for max endurance vs. flying for maximum range. The air force 1 version of the 747-8 probably has additional fuel capacity too.
@joefox9875
@joefox9875 Рік тому
Maybe the president wants to fly all around the world, permanently, so the sun never rises.
@iMatti00
@iMatti00 Рік тому
If you’re not considering a potential nuclear war situation, then I would agree. But nuclear war is not over in less than 24 hours. And a standoff where nuclear war may happen could last for weeks.
@forgedinferno5033
@forgedinferno5033 3 роки тому
The new livery looks like I was designed by Colgate
@skicrz
@skicrz 3 роки тому
Trump picked new colors which are the same color of his company plane.
@djssquibbs3295
@djssquibbs3295 3 роки тому
hahaha
@KNGLeonidas99
@KNGLeonidas99 3 роки тому
lmao
@keithm9513
@keithm9513 3 роки тому
Also the same as the Russian Flag.
@norfolksouthernrailworks1543
@norfolksouthernrailworks1543 2 роки тому
@@keithm9513 you realize they are the same as the American flag right? Idiot!
@salpah09
@salpah09 3 роки тому
Return to the traditional color scheme. It what makes so well recognized and respected (not always the occupant) in the world
@reelclosetrucking6925
@reelclosetrucking6925 3 роки тому
Especially the current IDIOT occupant that we have now!
@ktpinnacle
@ktpinnacle 3 роки тому
Agreed. There was no reason to change it. It was classy - even on a train for Bush's last ride it looked great.
@troyarrington5492
@troyarrington5492 3 роки тому
@@reelclosetrucking6925 k
@vaffangool9196
@vaffangool9196 3 роки тому
@@reelclosetrucking6925 Trump's been out of office since 20 Jan.
@reelclosetrucking6925
@reelclosetrucking6925 3 роки тому
@@vaffangool9196 , If you would...SHOW ME, where in my comment did I mention the GREAT PRESIDENT TRUMP! I’ll be awaiting your reply there BALLSACK! Speak RELEVANT OR DONT SPEAK AT ALL!
@edkolly7147
@edkolly7147 Місяць тому
Not having in air refueling capability is seen as a weakness if war does break out for obvious reasons !
@MarkWG
@MarkWG 15 днів тому
This would be a very tragic mistake if they leave that refueling feature out. But, who am I to say? I am just a lowly tax-payer.
@rosariodelsorbo3013
@rosariodelsorbo3013 3 роки тому
Built in Memory-Care Facility for Biden, nice touch.
@billolsen4360
@billolsen4360 2 роки тому
Now, now. Biden's got a memory. He just re-appointed Manual Lopez and Dean Rusk to the cabinet. "WHAT? They're both DECEASED? Ah, fiddle faddle. TARRRRnation! Okay, call up Frances Perkins. SHE's gone too?? Uh, how 'bout Tip O'Neill? TIP expired too?! I know, I'll call Ike personally. Republican, but a damn fine General. Just had a beer with him last night."
@NeonSamurai4381
@NeonSamurai4381 3 роки тому
Trump: I refuse to fly on a $4Billion aircraft Also Trump: I want bigger beds and a lavish interior This is absolutely paradoxical
@flexiexpress6713
@flexiexpress6713 3 роки тому
Trump has his own luxury 757 😂
@flexiexpress6713
@flexiexpress6713 3 роки тому
@Bro Momento exactly 😂
@gustavokennedy213
@gustavokennedy213 3 роки тому
Holy cow there coming back with super sonic wow.
@PaulMcElligott
@PaulMcElligott 3 роки тому
I’ll believe it when I see it.
@troyarrington5492
@troyarrington5492 3 роки тому
@@PaulMcElligott true. Super sonic planes always have to leap more bounds than non
@pushingdltin
@pushingdltin 2 роки тому
I believe the new aircrafts will be painted in the iconic blue and white livery.
@pattigouker3096
@pattigouker3096 Рік тому
I hope he keeps the original iconic paint job
@StallionFX1
@StallionFX1 3 роки тому
It’s interesting to see all the possibilities that were taken into consideration for a newer AF1. That said, I never knew that Airbus was approached for a modified presidential A380, but I’m not surprised to hear that they rejected the proposal. Considering that all U.S. presidential aircraft were exclusively Boeing, I think it would have caused a huge controversy among the people, that and most likely politics were involved. Still would have been interesting to see an A380 AF1. I also didn’t know that USAF is partnered with Boom for presidential supersonic travel. I’ve always loved the Concorde and glad there are a few companies including Boom tat are heavily invested into brinGING back supersonic travel. From the looks of it, it seems even more possible of becoming a reality. Despite how the pandemic has crippled many fields (including aviation), there are still some innovations with bright and exciting futures ahead. I look forward to the new AF1, Boom, and anything new in the aviation industry.
@alexandernorman5337
@alexandernorman5337 3 роки тому
The 747 is a better looking aircraft.
@johnp139
@johnp139 3 роки тому
It’s called full open competition. They weren’t excluded, but it would be required that the aircraft be assembled in the US.
@blackwolf1372
@blackwolf1372 3 роки тому
Iirc, they were leaning towards airbus, but the fact that the simple fact that it couldn't be manufactured and built in America and that airbus wasn't an American company wouldn't fit with their standards and ideology, I mean it kinda makes sense, they would want an American President to fly in an American plane that would be iconic
@laospeedwagon3023
@laospeedwagon3023 2 роки тому
As a dual European Citizen (but hopefully not for long… Jesus, just Brexit already!) and a U.S. Citizen, I can definitely see both sides logically AND as a matter of national pride. If Airbus were excluded from the bidding process, essentially GIVING the contract to Boing for it to charge whatever it wanted, I would have been furious as a tax paying American. That just screams of inviting waste, abuse, and outright fraud! However, AS an American, I can absolutely understand the need for end to end security, when it comes to the presidential aircraft. The U.S. President is just too much of a target, and too important of a person to fly on an aircraft that was built by thousands of foreign citizens, in multiple foreign countries. Everyone from the design engineers, the parts manufacturers, and the assembly crew down to the minimum wager who made the rivets, would need a full security clearance. That is a task that the FBI simply cannot perform on THAT MANY foreign nationals, fully and reliably, at any reasonable cost. The aircraft would absolutely have to be built in the U.S. by security cleared U.S. Citizens. Airbus knew this, and decided that it simply was not worth the cost to build-up a U.S. government bid, for a project that it knew it absolutely could not complete to U.S. security requirements and not carry a huge loss! Don’t forget, at the time of the RFP (request for proposal) Airbus already knew that it would be unlikely the A380 would remain in production for much longer, so why even bother bidding in the first place. As an American, seeing that ICONIC “hump” of the American 747 on the presidential aircraft, truly is a matter of national pride! I just can’t help but wonder what it’s like for Saudi citizens and many, many others to see their king, crown prince, president, or prime minister in a “foreign-made aircraft”? I do know that seeing things like the Japanese Emperor, as well as their Prime Minister flying around the globe on American planes (Boing 777-300’s) as well as the Leaders of Australia, India, and many others does make me proud to know that many world leaders are flying around the world on American Aircraft. It seems silly, I know, but it’s just one of those things we Americans do, (well, most of us, anyway!)… we absolutely love our country!
@aycc-nbh7289
@aycc-nbh7289 Рік тому
The A380 would make an interesting Air Force One aircraft, but since they have stopped producing the A380 to the ire of Emirates, I would not be surprised if they turned this request down at all.
@gendaminoru3195
@gendaminoru3195 3 роки тому
life expectancy is measured in hours and cycles at Boeing, not years.
@elliottd323
@elliottd323 2 роки тому
They in no way need a new 747 as long as it continues to fly, use it
@nw24153ns
@nw24153ns 2 роки тому
Make it a 777X & tell the press to pay for their own tickets or take an older 767 just for the press. If the president needs to do a press conference I'm sure they could do it by "zoom"
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 2 роки тому
The press can fly with the C-17 which is flying the same route anyway to deliver the armored vehicles
The Crazy World Of Presidential Jets And Royal Transport
15:13
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Переглядів 364 тис.
You Probably Didn't Know This About the NEW Air Force One
8:31
Beyond Facts
Переглядів 871 тис.
Teenagers Show Kindness by Repairing Grandmother's Old Fence #shorts
00:37
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Переглядів 29 млн
😱СНЯЛ СУПЕР КОТА НА КАМЕРУ⁉
00:37
OMG DEN
Переглядів 1,7 млн
Whats Going On with Air Force One?!
22:04
Mentour Now!
Переглядів 1,8 млн
The Logistics Of An Airbus A380 Private Jet
11:55
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Переглядів 728 тис.
This Is How The US President Travels Undercover
12:13
Beyond Facts
Переглядів 809 тис.
Rules Former Presidents Have To Follow
10:04
Grunge
Переглядів 14 млн
Fatal Error! How UPS Flight 1354 Ended in Disaster
40:59
Mentour Pilot
Переглядів 48 тис.
15 Largest Planes Ever Built
21:25
Top Fives
Переглядів 5 млн
The Next Air Force One: What’s The Latest?
8:23
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Переглядів 137 тис.