I'm Russian and I confirm that! Absolutely true! Thank you, stranger :) Anyway, it doesn't have any influence on the current political events. That's just the history.

I had read it was over hundreds of years and millions of slavs had been sold as slaves through the Muslim world.. it was referred to as the culling of the steppes? I could be way off, I read about it probably 2 decades ago.

@@davidsaidov8308 The problem today, is that the US is uncapable to compete in an open world. Their greed to be the leaders of the world by force and sadly to have a precident that sufers from dementia.

@@migueluribe4249 Yes Biden is a complete JOKE .. The US Mainstream media covers for him He is a controlled puppet president very sad and disturbing situation here

@@Kyle-lx7xo That's where you get the word Slave from the Slavic people Slavs. They were also slaves for many other countries for hundreds of years not just Muslim ones but you are correct

School bad, youtube good

No not really

People who say this shit dont study or do homework and then complain that they dont learn anything 🤣

@@vve5174 Fun fact: Did you know that homework was actually first used as a punishment?

@Dr. Doofenshmirtz the guys isnt joking. dont try to make an excuse for it. people actually believe youtube videos teach them more then years in school

Omg this is fascinating,took World History in my high school days ,it would be better then if we had this kind of learning

you meant yay part of Eastern Europe w?Russia

it is not detail at all, this video more like introduction

The video is very superficial. The events are simply listed, and the author does not answer questions about the connection between these events and the needs of Russia. About Ivan the Terrible - nothing at all, except that he was paranoid. Is the author a psychiatrist to diagnose? And the nickname itself - Ivan the Terrible is wrong. His nickname is closer to Thunderstorm, not horror. It is not said why he fought with the feudal lords. It is not said about the military, judicial and other reforms that strengthened Russia. Even the version that Ivan killed his son is only a version that has no evidence, but some present it as a fact. So those who want to know the history should not take such videos as a textbook.

@@evelynantonio4462 Interesting these historical stories on the internet are so valuable. I study WW2, the Third Reich, the Nazis, the technology developed during that war is poorly covered in school. I was fascinated by WW2 during two days in history class where we saw two films (as in real films shown on a projector) about WW2. Reading books by Joseph P. Farrell, for example, and all the videos on WW2 and Hitler really bring reality to recent 19th and 20th century history.

Yeah all for nothing. Hope they had a nice trip seeing half the world tho.

In WW1 the Germans had a Pacific fleet and they had some initial success engaging the British off the coast of Chile. Then they rounded the Cape and engaged some more British ships off Argentina and got completely annihilated. Every last ship sunk, no survivors.

the whole story is the baltic fleet was sabotaged by english spions

@@user-ij8mw8rb3d при чем тут Крым, речь о русско-японской

@@flatl1ne я не в ту ветку отправил свой комментарий.

That applies to every country lol

@@Admin-gm3lc . He must be talking about the WASTE LAND.

@@Admin-gm3lc How does that apply to Chad?

Literally

More like Britain 😂

Crazy

@ThyPeasantSlayer We don't do that here .__.

@ThyPeasantSlayer Youre legit celebrating Russia.. on a comment quoting a criticism about Nicholas II.

@@vimic9507 demonstration of the IQ index of Russian nationalist monarchists

@ThyPeasantSlayer SLAVE ROSSIA

Every country has had issues with another country at some point, its ridiculous to say that Russia is rival to all of these countries just because they were at conflict at some point in their thousand year existence

I did not mention the wars with the Khazar Khaganate, Byzantium, the Golden Horde, Lithuania, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Livonian Order, the Kazan and Crimean Khanate and the main enemy Great Britain.

Bro Russia beefing with everyone

Finland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia Also

Basically everyone that are close to it

As someone who was brought up in the UK, I agree with you. Large sections of history were omitted, and in fact were actually misleading through omission. I would not say weird however. As I grow older, and understand more of the world, and become more cynical, this is exactly as expected. The UK education system (presumably like all others in the world?) weights the syllabus to that of it's own interests. For example, when taught about WW2, the "Eastern Front" was taught as a side-show of the war in Europe, not the main event due to politics as this was the time of the Cold War still. This is a shame because over inflating the real British sacrifices made during the War, lessens them. History should be history, but it is often revised for political gain.

@@DeDyson The truth can't be hidden forever. Everything happend will be known sooner or later.

@@DeDyson you’re right. Therefore in British schools you will never receive information that more than 500 Nazi divisions were annihilate on the East front by the Red Army compared to more than 100 destroyed by Britain and US. Now make your own conclusion, whose role was more decisive in crashing of the Third Reich.

That's because in western schools chose not to teach kids. I remember when i was in school, we had to skip the part with the Russian Revolution and jump to the French Revolution, cause we were "running out of time" and had to cover all "key points".

@@DeDyson Yes, the Soviet Union single-handedly destroyed 80% of the German army - 6 times more than the USA, Great Britain and France. But the Cold War is over, and they still don't teach it in your schools.

When France became a republic they also adapted the Dutch flag by turning it on its side... although the French never admitted they did that and pretended they came up with their tricolour on their own.

It's not really like this. Despite really unclear early history of Russian flag red, blue and white was a main colors of Russian flag at least since 1667-1668 when father of Peter The Great still was the ruler of Russia. The first documented moment of this three colors being in use refers to the first Russian navy ship called Oryol (Eagle) which was built in 1667 for protection of trading ships in Caspian sea. And it's unclear in which order or in which shape the colors were but according to receipt books cloth of red, blue and white was used. It's unknown why these colors was used but it's a theory that they was using the red, blue and white cloths because it was the only available colors in the town (Dedinovo) where they was building the ship cuz it was colors of city's flag. I failed to finding the flag of town because nowadays it's this ship (Oryol) portrayed on the flag of Dedinovo. Also it is theory that even before this The Dutch Republic gifted a ship to Russia and since Russia never had ships before sailors just switched colors of the Dutch flag (but this is one of the most obscure theories). Later in 1694 it was documented that it was stripes with gold two-headed eagle (coat of arms of tsar of Moscow, basically the coat of arms of Romanov dynasty). In 1710 Peter The Great presented new flag for Russian navy (white field with blue saltire) and tricolor (white, blue, red stripes) became a flag of trading fleet. So Russian started to use white, blue and red before Peter The Great came to power but Peter definitely finished the establishment of these colors as main ones.

Peter Griffin.

Эти цвета основополагающие для славян

@@Aridaybey Чехия, Словакия, Словения, Сербия, Польша, Югославия, Хорватия

Cool story bro

It is like explaining how NATO is a defensive Alliance, while constantly invading other countries and growing in size

A fine irony. I have read something similar about Napoleon: he sought complete security for revolutionary France, but each victory and expansion made the French less secure, so they continued expanding aggressively in (pre-emptive) self-defence.

Yeah when u think about it's kinda true

@@fhffvgju6299 ye

Eareaeareaeareaeareaeareaeareacool.era

Они скоро переведут это видео на русский. Каналов таких не так уж и мало, нужно просто поискать - например "История Российской Империи".

Мы живем в обществе.

Мне нравится английский язык,, Я очень хорошо знаю английский. Мы должны сделать нашу страну более дружественной к английскому языку.

Что бы знать чью либо историю , внезапно, -нужно читать историческую литературу

Ура я здесь не один Русский

日本ファシスト？😂

I am finnich and i and tyoutube are lerning me enlich and i learn japanese too

LANGUAGE

I’m here for listening English as well! Konnichiwa!

Me too but I'm not japanese

Same as the British Royals.

@@DS9TREK same as Indonesia royals *in alt world*

Same as the Romanian royals. Even now we have a german president..........

@@afdalridwan3813 Same as the gogglebobblewit royals *E*

Same as the whole world boy

Yes

Yes, but he (Rahul Venkit) wrote that he decided to move on to other projects

@SmashRockCroc that's your opinion and it doesn't count.

@SmashRockCroc Yes kid, our prophet was illiterate.

@SmashRockCroc Lol I don't mention kids, i am mentioning you.

+

Cannot , all history war wich west and south

Populations of countries before the modern age are all speculations though.

@@Fankas2000 Even an approximate figure would be helpful.

Agreed.

"Invade Russia they said, I'll be easy they said"

NAPOLEON after invading Russia ......."I think I go back in time :/"

Napoleon was winned by Kazakh warriors. 100 K kazakhs won him.

@@nur-alijanqojayev329 where did you got this information?

@@artemvektor1 by french historics. Of course russian historics won’t say the truth

so if i test you on the information of this video next week, you will remember everything? if you think so you are delusional.

@@edofluit6568I would be able to recall things better than what the school system would have taught me.

True that

@@edofluit6568 you are a teacher aren't you?

@@edofluit6568 I mean, if you are forced to remember stuff you don't like and you will never use it, you will forget it. But if you learned something because you think it's interesting and or use it all the time, then you will 100% memorize it.

980K

There are big but one if the worst events in russian history

you must be aware that your country is now at the height of it's receiving hate as your president and your army is committing war crimes in ukraine

Если б ты не спал на уроках, то знал бы всё это.

​@@settaquilon если система образования было нормальное то все бы знал он)

@@user-pn6ct2rd7o плохому танцору вечно что-то мешает.

@@settaquilon 🤨📸 🏻🤔 🤣 🏻👉🤡

And Yeltsin in one month gave away almost everything that the Russians had collected for centuries

@@plumbirb8444 periodic uprisings throughout Russia throughout history will clearly disagree with you. The same USSR is the result of a revolution. And do not forget that in the Leningrad region, located 700 kilometers from the capital, 7 million people live, which is more than in Serbia, Kosovo, Croatia, Bulgaria and several other small European countries. The point is not the weakness of the regions, but their dependence on each other

@@plumbirb8444 а зачем восставать? Чтобы иметь лишние налоги, границы, языковой барьер, культурный барьер? Вам никогда не понять что мы стремимся к единому мирному существованию, пока вы воюете сотнями городов-государств.

That land is useless unless you need natural resources for the industry. The development of the industry was hindered by the fact that it is too cold to build and maintain factories. That is how Russia ended up having a weak industry despite having a lot of natural resources.

And even crazier that all of those lands are people who invaded Russia and we chased them bad home, Russia never invaded and stole and a land, we always turned the cards around

Soon they will blame ME for things that happened before I was born.

Right? As if cold winters and bad roads magically do not affect Russians just like the enemies.

@@anastasiab9506 The best example is the winter war, where Soviet soldiers froze to death in mass numbers.

@@maggotfeast So what? Finns lost it anyway.

@Ju Kannstmima You have to check when exactly murikans have joined ww1. Czar's military have never used lend-lease and bought required arms as usual. Theres no Russia since february 1917. Communist's regime wasn't russian fyi, even if your mass media spreads opposite.

all official history, soon people will learn actual history and will be surprised.

@@evgeniam685 Russia : Watch out, my peoples begin to starved in the winter i might be need some spices, potato's and more meat from Britain Napoleon : How about NO?

It was a mistake. Russia had to make a deal with Napoleon to destroy Britain

Yeah it's always funny that people nitpick so much from video. Like jeez

is it really?

The European settler community would not have survived without the Iroquois who were long time allies of both the French and the English. The Iroquois had their own ambitions and fought other indigenous nations long before the arrival of the Europeans.

@@tanler7953 that's true of other Native American tribes too, not just the Iroqouis. The Iroquois League is another interesting story in itself, needs its own video here.

He already did a video on it.

Wow how bad can your American schools get?

Same here

@@TomLikesfn684 I’m not American.

@@Barsik-M I’m really not American. I’m from Europe….

@@Barsik-M I literally despise america so much 💀

If you want to see the real Russia, you should not go to big cities like Moscow or St. Petersburg)

Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg (Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!

но в основных вопросах в ролике придуманные и неверные причинно следственные трактовки событий

@@user-nu7sm7kc7s тут скорее не "неверные", а иной взгляд со стороны запада. Например, в российской историографии южные регионы Центральной Азии упоминаются как "Узбекские ханства" и на месте будущего казахского Ханства "Узбекское Ханство"(название связано с ханом из узбекской династии Шайбанидов, хотя узбеков там не так уж и много). На западе используют для упрощения Transoxania, или Мавераннахр, а Ханство Абулхаира(Узбекское) употребляется так же, как и в России У нас, в Казахстане отмечают все государства региона. Ну, ещё от шайбанидов выделают Шибанидов как другую ветку, хотя на западе этого нет 🤔 В общем, какие источники, такая и подача.

@@FamouShinya скорее всего было всё проще.,если где то в той стороне жили узбеки.,то и землю некоторые кабинетные географы рисовали как получалось по направлению

@@user-nu7sm7kc7s где-то видел карту 1440 года, где все государства Шайбанидов объединили. От южной Сибири до Узбекистана одна большая территория :0

@@FamouShinya странно,,в старых картах эти области носят одно название-моголо-тартария

Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg (Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!

Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg (Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!

Russia did not annex Finland, Russia seized part of Sweden, which later became Finland.

Tell me if I'm wromg, but did Montenegro take a little bit of Serbia in the 1914 map as well?

@@Snoflakes_1 I think u r right

@@Rencheek no Finland was not Sweden it was a part of Swedish empire

In Helsinki, there is a monument to Alexander the first for the statehood of Finland that he donated, even though it was part of the Russian empire, having recaptured Finland from the Swedes. The Swedes did not say that this is the land of the Finns as part of Sweden

U clearly have no idea of russia :d its all have been shithole except Petersburg and Msocow.

melting pots killed the US.

they ruled by the same technology as the Tatars once ruled Ancient Russia: they concluded agreements with the princes of local tribes, supporting one against the other, They themselves collected tribute for Moscow. Plus small military garrisons for order, plus trading posts

@@nika6184 you're kidding, Kazan and Ekaterinburg alone are much cooler than Moscow and St Petersburg

Any Russian will testify that they don't manage it :P. More serious answer: at least until the USSR, it was the standard way, where every region has its own leader, who in turn report to the tsar. As long as the region likes its leader and that leader likes the tsar, all is well. It's how feudalism did it, and similar to how federalism solves it. Additionally it may be huge, but most is wasteland. Such regions can't really rebel effectively even if they wanted to, there's litlle there to invade for, and government tends to have limited influence in those far reaches anyway. Same way it's manageable for other huge wasteland countries like the US, China's inlands, Canadia and Denmark.

Tomayto tomatto

@@aarongranda7825 ok Ay-Aron

Maybe that's the english version of that name? But I am not sure....

It's the same name bruh

the first uprise was was made by the independent Albanian pashas from the Ali pasha of ionaninna and others there was no greece and serbia at that time...in reality the so-called Greek war of independence it was a religious civil war between Albanians...practically between Arvanites vs Albanians of egypt and Suliotes vs Ali pasha of ioannina ..

modern egypt was also created by the albanians.. and when the albanian Mehmet Ali of Egypt after the battle of nizip wanted to invade istanbul that empire was saved by the russians and other european powers except france

There was also a Romanian uprising in 1821, in the same time with the Greek one.

@@Flankerski Yes, i know that. Wr had it in 1804-1815, then second uprise, or freedom revolution in 1815-1817.

Здравствуй, сестра! Русские и сербы братья навек!

Forget second balkan war?

@@gonoriq Greece owned it at the time. My mistake. But its still wrong

Yes but they still pushed the Russians back in Manchuria and Sakhalin

Just before this fact, you need to know one more thing. Before this war, Japan was considered among the countries of the third world, unable to repulse any European country. Japan has proven otherwise.

@@colombus4400 I am well aware of that. It was a huge deal at the time that an Asian power had defeated a European Empire in a straight-up fight. The point is simply that to describe it as "dominating" is inaccurate. It was a very hard-fought, costly victory for the Japanese land forces, and that's one of the main reasons why the Japanese Navy emerged from the war with a much better reputation than the army.

The same argument could be made for the Soviets in WW2 who by far had the most casualties.

Pretty sure they won almost all the battles

Do they realy get on tv there 😁

@@thefirstkingdogo1126 Yes they did 😁

Which video?

@@hehehehaw3521 this one actually. The one about the Russian Empire

After hundreds of years of trading in Russian slaves, the Crimean Tatars were lucky that they were not annihilated to zero.

@@APXuBAHgAJI ...and? The actions of individual Crimean Tatars in medieval times doesn't justify the ethnic cleansing and genocide under Stalin's regime centuries later. The only reason the peninsula is majority Russian today is because its native inhabitants were killed, imprisoned, or expelled. To this day, the Russian government has yet to compensate or repatriate any survivors or their descendants, and even goes so far as to ban Tatars from moving back to their homeland.

@@APXuBAHgAJI what a nice genocidal maniac. Adolf, Mao and Jossif would have been your best friends. what a nice company.

@@p00bix Based russians

​@@APXuBAHgAJI Russians had been trading Russian slaves for centuries too, treating them like animals, bartering them for dogs etc. Yet they did not "annihilate themselves to zero". Curious.

они не воевали..так мелкие недоразумения

It appears that Europe has had more wars than the rest of the world combined.

What about too big Montenegro?

What about southern Tyrol?

@@CYbeRuKRaINiaN It is just unaccurately drawn but you know it's meant to represent the Austrian ownership of Southern Tyrol, while in Bulgaria's case a modern map was just copy-pasted and inserted into the video

Yeah, but somehow that's not even relevant. Romania returned southern Dobrogea to Bulgaria after WWII anyway.

@@Flankerski Yes but Bulgarian access to the Aegean sea really had a role in maritime trade and strategic interests, independent of tarrifs that could be placed by the Ottoman Empire and leaves the possibilities of Bulgaria being isolated navally by the Ottomans very unlikely.

That's what part three is going to be

Technically it started due to England putting economic sanctions on Germany. Germany used Arch Duke Ferdinand assassination as the excuse to go to war. Sanctions do have consequences. In the sacrifices of much blood on the battlefield.

@@blackwidowsm Ye I've seen that side of things too. Apparently Germany was going to overtake UK, so they did everything to stop them.

@@blackwidowsm Basically it was a pointless war that was only started for money and power. Millions losing their life so the people in charge got rich, and the people that spoke out got put in prison too. And to think of weren't greedy WW2 would never have happened.

@@GCAbleism158 only if WW1 didnt happen. WW2 was more of a continuation after a truce

You totally wrong. Im Russian, but if you like this illusion and ignorance, it's up to you.

@@qwertyqwerty2129 ты не русский.