Man the monk was very relaxed & calm & freak fast as seen on tv I believe if it would have been a real fight , the Monk wins hands down He really wasn’t even breathing hard

Did you love the way he made contact with his kicks? Oh wait he never one time struck the other dude. Kung Fu LOL.....

I'm sorry, did we watch the same video? Neither fighter understood range and both were scared.

but his attack is useless

@@2Sage-7Poets taekwondo too don't think taekwondo is effective

Your a child

All fake crap.

Stop acting like you can even present a challenge to either one

You are overcompensating your short stature via computer keyboard with a side order of Napoleonic Complex😂🖕

Thank you for the explanation. It provides a lot of context.

@@hotlanta35 he's just stating the context bro he didn't said anything that he can challenge one of the fighters

🤣 🤙🏼

Yeah the monk seems a little better for sure.

Yes, Shaolin Monks are amazing that's why we see so many Champion Monks in mma. Oh wait....you not only don't see Champions there are not even any Shaolin Monks who are competitive. Basically they suck in a real fight

@@joereidy5732 Your ignorance is showing along with a lot of juvenile disrespect.

@@surfwriter8461 I won't name call because you disagree with me, THAT is juvenile. However, if you actually want to engage in this conversation and not just act like a kid, tell me where Shaolin Monks have ever excelled in a real fight. If you do decide to answer back it up by actual proof. :-)

@@joereidy5732 average american found. Martial arts in asia has different purposes than martial arts in the west , as the previous person already said, your ignorance is showing. Dont even ask me to explain the different purposes, you can do research and find enlightenment of your own accord. I take my leave of you now

if only these monk ( great discipline ) practice REAL fighting ,wrestling,boxing muay thai and bbj they be tough to beat

I am at a loss for the awe people are showing for the "monk" had they been actually trying to strike each other there is no telling the outcome.

@@cjkersh monk would have taken him apart. With all do respect to the taekwondo champ, he looked clumsy and awkward by comparison

Хуетень полнейшая

tkd fighter is trained to get points in a tournament, in a real fight the monk would win (not to downplay the tkd champs skill ofc)

No the art of fighting without fighting is called Talking to someone and defeating them through mental manipulation via words

@@martinkuliza thank you.

Yo Canadian how's the moose ?

honestly if this were real fight, the Taekwondo guy won. Taekwondo without grappling or punches actually went pretty far in MMA. Shaolin arts strikes are too weak

@@doldemenshubarti8696 honestly no real way to prove that at the end of the day the stronger mind and stronger trained fighters win its not about the specific martial art applied

yeah... right, that's what he was doing LOL Also it's not Murder if the other guy agreed to the fight and stepped into the ring so.. on the assumption that he delivered a lethal blow it would not have been murder , Not even manslaughter it would have been FLAWLESS VICTORY !!!!!! LOL Hey, i just noticed something Why are there no more emoji's to choose from when commenting in you tube ?

honestly the kungfu guy would've lost. I've sparred against both types (Shaolin and Taekwondo), and while Shaolin were quicker, they had even less defense than Taekwondo. Average Muay Thai practitioner with about 1.5 year of full contact sparring and minimal training on any grappling art would smoke both of them at the same time.

@@doldemenshubarti8696 yeahhhhh no you didnt my guy you never sparred with either your words prove that

@@br0kentower292 on the contrary, if you EVER sparred even ONCE against ANY successful MMA art, you wouldn't even be replying to me. You are the one showing you haven't sparred a minute in your entire life.

@@doldemenshubarti8696 nice insult considering i never claimed to have sparred with anyone

He later became the national general coach of Hungarian policemen. Many lucky high ranking officials feel so proud of being his students!

You need mentally evaluated

I feel the same about mma fighters.

I was at Shaolin from 98 on and off till 2004

@@thesterlingone1072 real martial arts gives you spiritual and intellectual aspects you don't get from western "combat sports". AND it also gives you effective fighting. But if literally all you want is the fighting then yeah that braindead MMA stuff is fine. :)

@@neutrino78x go join a reputable jiujitsu gym for a couple months, attending a couple classes a week. I’ll wait for you to come back and apologize 🤣🤣

yep. so many things were said about this before but its a fake fight for demonstration purposes only.

imagine playing a video game... just imagine.. so epic

@@sfkingalpha You never played Tekken in your life you are okd af, or socially awkward. Mr.Condescending. I am a grown man by the way, and I can even appreciate the thought process brought into the Tekken franchise. This fighting match is good. Also, Tekken holds professional tournaments with individuals young and old using strategies and techniques that simulate fights such as this one in the video. So before you act superior, know this: you are uneducated, and resorted to passive aggressiveness because you do not have any room to actually say anything. The definition of a clown. I do not play Tekken. I played Tekken before. I have seen clips of tournaments over the years. Why are you even here. Your turn girlie.

@@sfkingalpha lmfao why’d you do that. Lol run inside, thats carpet bombs raining down on your pretty little head.

then it will be kicked out of olympics just like MMA.

Hit by everything? Did we watch the same video? hehe

@@niklaspsarros8675 no he did not. This was stalemate at best

Bro this was a demonstration they were both holding back thier kicks to not make contact.

Except he literally didn't land every strike he threw. He "landed every hit", but by definition a hit is only a hit insofar as it lands. I'm sure you didn't mean to say that tautology.

Reminds me of that clip of Bruce Lee speaking “ Be like water my friend” & he elucidate’s on what he means. It’s quite griping.

Agreed

I agree with your comment about favoring some light contact instead of just a non-contact display of styles.

Probably choreograph, lol but looks beautiful, I've watched this before, I just came back here to see it again

Fights are meant to be messy. That’s why it’s very hard to believe this how a Shaolin Monk fights

That´s indeed a good comparison. Love and practiced both styles.

Ive fought kickboxer with karate background, boxer with taekwondo background, and pure shaolin dude from some hole in wall. the boxer was the hardest to spar, kickboxer was almost as hard (kicks and punches weren't as devastating), and I knew shaolin was a joke as soon as the guy started blinking from wind generated by a missed high kick

That’s a curious comparison. Unless he’s trapped in a very tight space which is uncommon in their habitat. A Cheater does 0-4O in 3 strides. A lion attacking one in the open would be making a fool of himself. I call that win for the cheater he will look back over his shoulder & say “ Are you brain dead or what” This is all in humor

Wrong

Yes, both are clearly avoiding hard contact; I assume that was the plan. So it's mainly a showcase for style differences, not martial arts power or effectiveness in combat. I would also say both styles could be considered external or hard styles, unlike internal styles Tai Chi and Bagua, though the Shaolin monk is definitely trained in using chi in combination with strikes and kicks. That's not the same as "jin" power which is internal power in various forms and can be used in concert with technique or without it.

to be more precise, it's called fake martial arts.

Nice to hear someone with respect for the various art forms instead of always talking down the shao Lin thanks

You are really fixated on your imaginary 9X arent you?

@@cjkersh Absolutely. For whatever reason, I've observed in in many tournaments. Bruce Lee broke the mold. Everyone else, defends for as long as possible before attacking then they always open up. Aikedo always only attacks after being attacked. They're an exception.

I'm calling BS. I think it was 9.675 times...

@@michaeltaylor2799 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/r51jl3pvaqljs58.htmlm40s

Are you saying that was you. That’s the way it reads. In which case, great exhibition match your amazing. Are you a 9th degree. Is that where all the 9’s come from. ( humor) or if you didn’t mean it was you. My mistake. You seem to know a great deal in any event :))

Up to the player

Agreed. A lot of people seem to forget that once you reach a level of proficiency, then you have to realise that 2 experts, when faced together, have to treat a fight like a chess game. Going in all guns blazing seldom works. Remember, you're facing someone with or even a higher level of skill, not an unitiated member of the public. Only REAL Martial artists would know this.

@@charlesaye-darko7517 still until it’s time to execute. If you notice, the monk waits and times his assault. Either one only failed at connecting because there was such a large area for each to back peddle. I would like to see the two in closer quarters and what happens. Or since this was 40 years ago, perhaps their student’s students.

@@Inquisitivemind97 Would they, though? This is fight quest Kung Fu. Two Red Neck Fu guys vs actual Shaolin Monks at the temple in China. I don't know Chris, looks like the monks know what they're doing. I think they would kick your ass. Just sayin. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/r51jl3pvaqljs58.htmlm37s

@@Inquisitivemind97 guys in the octagon get dursted in a real fight almost immediately. Pride fights had the last real fighters that could handle on the street. Octagon is just a fancy boxing ring with limiting rules compared to real combat.

@@Inquisitivemind97 guys in the octagon get wasted on the street. It’s not real fighting either. True these guys couldn’t backpedal the way they are in a smaller space, but the octagon rules are set up to protect the way jujitsu fighters fight. All the moves you use to neutralize an opponent shooting for you are illegal to use in the octagon. Let them try that jujitsu on the street and they’ll get knocked out immediately or have their windpipe crushed.

he's a monk, he has nothing to hold back

@@NuwandaLunaDragon the monk held back cause if you see the video many times you'll see if he didn't held back, the other guy would have been down on so many occasions. Besides, it's a TV show. It's a show. No point injuring people.

@@AshRinz talking seriously, both of them are clearly holding back you just don´t announce your kicks like that, there´s no baiting, no timing, no counter attacks just attack, defend, step back

Кызыл адемы тептыго

When an unstoppable force meets an Immovable object 1 of 2 things always happens 1. When they meet nothing happens because the Nett Result is Neutral 2. However... In most cases.... You will find out that one of the statements was bullshit, either something was not LITERALLY unstoppable or something else was not LITERALLY immovable IN WHICH CASE, THE OTHER ONE WINS

@@martinkuliza if nothing happens then the immovable object won as it did not move.

@@joaquinmenendez3899 No... the Immovable object can only win if the unstoppable object was not literally unstoppable but was actually stopped and stopped by the immovable object When nothing happens there is no winner the result is neutral (a tie if you will)

@@martinkuliza “nothing happens” can’t exist because that implies that the immovable object wasn’t moved by the “unstoppable force”. Its either one or the other must win. That’s literally the point of the phrase. lol???????

@@joaquinmenendez3899 "Nothing Happens" can most certainly exist,, what are you talking about ? if you sit in one place and do nothing then nothing happens it can most certainly exist "Its either one or the other must win. That’s literally the point of the phrase. lol???????" You laugh but you sound stupid 1. THE PHRASE ITSELF WHEN IT WAS INVENTED IS FLAWED AND IT NEVER ACTUALLY CHECKED IF THE IMMOVABLE OBJECT WAS INDEED IMMOVABLE AND THE UNSTOPPABLE FORCE ACTUALLY UNSTOPPABLE so when you laugh, it's stupid 2. No, it is not a requirement that someone MUST WIN, No, Not at all 3. There are only 3 outcomes, you can pick one Outcome 1 The immovable object is actually Immovable but the unstoppable force is not actually unstoppable but assumed unstoppable. in this case IMMOVABLE OBJECT WINS because it cannot be move Outcome 2 The immovable object is actually moveable and the unstoppable force is unstoppable in which case UNSTOPPABLE FORCE WINS Outcome 3 All Assumptions were true and unstoppable object is unstoppable and immovable force is truly immovable in which case THEY CANCEL EACH OTHER OUT AND THERE IS NO WINNER AS THEIR CANNOT BE , THE RESULT IS NETT ZERO IT'S A TIE, THERE IS NO WIN IN THIS CASE My point literally was that the saying is flawed it's a bullshit assumption THINK FOR A SECOND How can a human be an unstoppable force when .... if a car was to hit you you die How can a human be an immovable object when i can push a human out of the way if i choose IT'S A BULLSHIT STATEMENT There are no immovable objects here There are no unstoppable forces here THAT'S A FACT so there can be a win and a win will be obtained when One person STOPS the other of one persons MOVES the other too far but you laughing and holding behind that statement is stupid because the statement is flawed

Bullshit this fight is much more better dam MMA to watch

eeehhhhhhhhhh !!! 😂