Lol they valve wishes he was their employee

Welp, valve seems to make the best decisions in their designs here, so warowl's praises rarely seem to be out of bounds, but that Artefact bit oof, I completly disagree with that, that game does not go any way in par with magic or even hearthstone in its best days (and hell do I hate to give credit to the blizzard of late)... Anyways hate to say it but it made him look like a bit of a sellout there ... I hope I am wrong.

Always has been

He knows too much

Warowl is valve

@@Alocater And as we know it will stop there XD

Except lowering the skill ceiling will be extremely harmful in the long-term because it hurts the population that ultimately bring in those new players in the first place. EDIT: giving players the ability, on screen, that is equivalent to a player acquiring the ability, lowers the skill ceiling as the player no longer NEEDS to acquire it (don’t assume they will). Follow recoil, noise on radar, and any of these accessibility changes all have the same effect but most of you guys are hypocritically biased towards one of these changes that you subjectively think are good/less harmful. Causal and new players decide what pvp games they play based on popularity, and they often put in very little hours comparatively. When a game loses popularity those players drop quick. Look at any streamer popular game once the streaming community goes to play something else. There is a reason that the pvp games with the highest consistent player count have a high skill ceiling. The competitive players put in 100x more hours than anyone else, they promote the game more than any other group, and they play the game consistently. Hurt the competitive players by lowering the skill ceiling and the only hope you have to ensure a game stays popular is by constantly releasing new content or paying streamers to play your game.

Yeah next they should add aim assist too.

@@Johnsmithhjoe i doubt it since valorant is still crazy popular and not declining in popularity at all

@@Johnsmithhjoe They're not lowering the skill ceiling, they're raising the skill floor.

ive always felt like the ragdoll in csgo felt way worse than what they had in css, i was really disappointed when i tried the beta back in 2012. the ragdoll in cs2 looks absolutely fantastic though, i cant wait to try it

Thats like tarkov level physics tbh, looks really damn good

@@ChubbyChubgger bro people be doing backflips after i shoot em in the leg

​@@ChubbyChubgger yes i agree, but csgo ragdoll is so goofy lol

the ragdoll in source 2 is really good. glad they upgraded the physics, itll make s&box a joy.

r_decals 999 mp_decals 999

​@@unr34L-they didn't implement those commands in source 2

@@Franshela it’s so over

@@unr34L- they can add those in a simple patch but yeah gaming is dead

Yeah, I'd much rather have immersion and contextual cues than whatever the guy who devotes 20 hours a day to the game needs for that competitive edge I couldn't give two shits about.

this.

get a free skin if you checkout my name :)

the smoke looks really bad the game will flop

​@@Yoloswags didn't realize the cs stands for cool smoke and without whatever you think is right it'll do poorly. Have you considered applying for a project management position at valve?

@@Yoloswags skill issue, honestly, or you just havent seen a smoke in real life

Ye it was a game killed by (justified) circlejerk of the community and valve just giving up. The base-concept is still one of the most fun cardgames i have ever played

and not having a ranked mode on release

Monetisation was the real issue. Paid game with pay-to-win system on top of it? From good reputation developer like Valve? Marketing did not had any chance.

yeah if only they had made artifact one board and add more boards the higher the ranks. The game had charm and could have been amazing if they make it easy first and a ranking system.

As a collectible card game ignorant, have they improved the monetization? Is it worth trying out or is it a wasted potential?

Exactly the solution. I hope they do this

A very good solution to not allowing 4:3 (or other aspect ratios) would be to have the game automatically recognize the monitor resolution but also the aspect ratio and be locked (CS 2) to those settings. This is my opinion.

@@JordanKL1 If they don't do it, I'll be disappointed, but at the same time it will be hilarious to see every memorable player still use 4:3 in 2030.

i mean, you can exploit resolution for the same effect, so why lock the fov?

New here, which Quake game? (like year released)

i was there when it opened in 1955 too i remember

And honestly, more of that. You don't need that many "high skill barriers" when you can just have a high skill ceiling instead. You still have your "pro level" plays and one tapping with perfect accuracy (really though, I hate this part of CS that everything goes in blink of an eye and if you're not perfect you just loose), but a new player at least has a chance to do anything more then be cannon fodder.

@@simplysmiley4670 yes.. absolutely! And the teammates will also be able to use the full tool set needed to play. A win for everyone

the problem is people were jumping to conclusions assuming the grenade preview was accessible during ranked matches which would damage the competitive skill ceiling of the game.

@@MontySlython that would have been a problem.

@@simplysmiley4670 " I hate this part of CS that everything goes in blink of an eye and if you're not perfect you just loose" TBH, Counterstrike is actually pretty slow when you think about it. The game takes place over 16-30 rounds and takes ~40 minutes a match, and while an individual play might go by in the blink of an eye, actual strategies for the match, including adapting setups, economy management, utility placement, and mind games evolve over the course of all those rounds. Having a newish player who's a bad shot isn't the end of the world in matchmaking if they can throw decent utility and buy their teammates, plus even dying like cannon fodder can be leveraged in your team's favour by baiting and trading or acting as an early warning system against flanks and surprise pushes.

thank you, I really appreciate it! My mentality to approaching a video is this: every video MUST have 2 things: a laugh-out-loud moment that catches you off guard, and a meaning. I'm finding lately that I enjoy writing way more than I enjoy editing the videos.

​@TheWarOwl please say hi to me :)

@@TheWarOwl That's a great mentality, I have found your videos quite enjoyable for this reason. They're a little funny, I can always take something away from them, and I find myself constantly engaged by what you're talking about. I really don't feel like you waste any time in your script, so thank you for respecting our time!

@@Bleacherzzz hi

@@alpran you know what. I'll take it. Hello :)

they look very out of place and jarring

​@@geniuz4093 they'll probably fix how it looks like. Nevertheless volumetric smoke is fantastic.

​@@geniuz4093 right right, but smoke grenades where one person can see the enemy but the other cant seems like it belongs in the game

@@Pyxyty it feels more counter-strikey . If they fix the visuals I will be happy with volumetric

@@zoinksscoob6523 yes the concept is great the execution though it looks ugly

Just a small note, they are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts it's all for money, valve is not a game company anymore.

I think they dont deserve praise. If you count how much money they do only with boxes in a month is crazy, I dont remember where I saw that there was a point where the csgo team employees was like 12 people... I never understood why Valve didnt invest more money on such a succesful game. Still love the game but Im sure it deserves more love from the company.

Most developers don't understand what tech debt means. They think it means "bad code" or "cruft". It doesn't. Debt isn't a bad thing, and neither is technical debt. It's a good thing when used right. Debt is borrowing from future you for the benefit of present you. Sometimes you need to get something done quickly, and so you hand off some work to the future in order to save some work now. That can be good or bad depending on what you do, why you do it, etc. You can borrow money to buy a car (probably stupid) or to buy a house (probably smart). You can maintain a line of credit to help with cash flow issues when you're actually solvent (smart) or you can borrow money to buy crates and open them hoping to get a knife (very stupid). You can write quick code that will need to be cleaned up later to get something done when the 'real solution' will slot right in and work fine (good). You can write quick code that will need to be completely rewritten later in a way that will be buggy, will break, or will just be impossible to change later (bad).

@aec aec Just like everyone in the history of the world. It has nothing to do with 'capitalism' (a meaningless propaganda word for what people have always done - voluntarily buy and sell things).

​@aec aec not true. If everything ever is only done for money, then why do people make mods? Why do they write fanfiction or make memes?

wait until you see all those cheater russians

​@anthalos2516 They have always existed especially at lower ranks. Russia should get their own server in the eu closer to them

I would stick to 1.6 🙂

so you dont want any competition?

@@kiritiray6377 he's being sarcastic... I hope

of course they're being sarcastic, you dummies. you don't need a ph.d. to despise new players!

@@WaterDroplet02 it's hard to tell with the counter strike community. They could just be playing into the joke but actually meaning it

...kidding of course 😉 Always great to have more people join the CS community!

@Tage Sjögärd Narrator : he, in fact, did not master the mechanics of CSGO

Started as S1, graduated as SE

@@kingjasko mastered that degree tho lfg

Unless I'm missing something, the decals don't disappear. They just get duller to not mess with contrast.

CSGO did that, though...

Found the only person who likes tutorials in my life

​@@geisonmcd I love tutorials

​@@patrickhealy2954 but it's just a "shoot enemy, run, defuse de bomb, repeat"!

​@Geison Machado lots of people appreciate knowing what they're doing and not learning by failure purely

Yeah. Stretched might make the models appear bigger on screen, but it also takes away peripheral vision. Clearly a choice everyone has to make. The issue with FOV sliders how they are usually implemented in games is that they scale both axes. And using scopes on guns just reduces FOV to "zoom in" But even a slider that does both axes wouldn't be an issue. In basically every FPS with a FOV slider, it's a choice between seeing a lot, but small, and seeing little, but big. For extremes, setting FOV to 20 would mean it always looks like you're scoped in, but you can't see anything else. Setting it to 160 would mean you have immense view to the side, but all the stuff around your crosshair would be tiny. And usually players tend to play somewhere in between, differs a bit from game to game, but few players play at either extreme that the game allows.

I agree. A FOV slider would be great.

@@HappyBeezerStudios "Stretched might make the models appear bigger on screen, but it also takes away peripheral vision. " True, but when you weigh the actual results, stretched is objectively better in CS. The pros simply outweigh the cons.

Agreed! I was just about to comment the same thing. Just let people reduce the FOV.

@@Likexner yeah, I personally dislike using high fovs in any game, so it would be great

exactly the only way to really properly learn recoil patterns in CS:GO is to... play third-party training maps, offline, for possibly hours nobody wants to fucking do that, nobody is gonna want to spend time *not playing the game,* in order to *learn how to play the game.* that's backwards as hell and any player who's against this is just mad that new players won't have to suffer like they did, and may infact catch up with their skill level and whoop their ass

The problem is that it makes it easier for pro players too, for example when you spray transfer, you know exactly where the spray is and deletes a lot of the skill, also learning spray patterns is not hard, just spray into a wall and try to keep up with the recoil, you dont need 100 hours practicing recoil. Its like saying "Hey we should make the heads bigger so that it's easier for people to headshot, the good players dont need it because they can already aim but the noobs will love it!"

In 2 minutes?!?!!!!!!!??

HAHAHAHAHA SO FUNNY IVE NEVER HEARD THIS JOKE BEFORE SO FUNNY SO ORIGINAL

That's not even possible

ha ha so unny

That's not true, its been 14 minutes and ive only been able to watch 11 times, smh

Colored smokes are a bad idea though. I see no reason why you should know who threw a smoke just from looking at it.

I'm waiting for them to remove air strafing to level the playing field even more

​@earl krits what are you talking about bro? What level on faceit are you?

@@arcueid3352 hes saying cs bad valo gud. Tyrone also good because he gives me tendies.

@@Likexner Because not every random in csgo communicates with the team, and in your average mm game which is the majority of the playerbase, some people either dont have a mic, or choose to not speak in chat or voice at all. So why should you, the other player be punished for another players choice? Its literally just a visual clarity thing. Get over it

Nah they'll do cs2 episode 1

Nah the name is shit. I hated Overwatch 2's name, so I gotta remain consistent.

@@friendofp.24 Its better name than csgo 2 or CS: But Better

@@poofsplix2003 they will do CS:more than 2 but less than 4

@@Tanaphat14817 CS2+1

Team fortress 2

Because valve can’t make every game people want to play

That's true, there were so many remakes that just did the "we make a completly new thing out of it" but all we ever wanted was the same game in a new shine so it's still playable today, we don't need new mechanics or a completly different playstyle.. that's not a remake 😭

Because kids/consoles. Lol

We have reached greatness

I agree. A long time CS player probably if not mostly would hesitate to understand, so let's use a more extreme skill ceiling game -- Touhou(just youtube Touhou gameplay). It's a game where there's fewer if not no time to breath at all. The skill ceiling is extremely high if not no where to be seen, and most of all it's very unfriendly to beginners. Those long time CS players wouldn't like change/new cause they would lose their advantage, their edge from training over the years, Being a new player is detrimental cause they don't know/did the tweaks the long time CS players did. Everyone is just siding to themselves which gives them the most advantage, if you're a long time CS player, ofcourse you don't like change and lose all the advantage of all that training moot. Ofcourse you won't say that and say something subjective and idealistic like "What makes CS CS"

@@MangaGamifyyou act like people who didn’t play counterstrike 1.6 didn’t go through this and people who played counterstrike source didn’t go through this as well. This is nothing new. The people who were and are the most dedicated to the version of counterstrike they played the most, cry the loudest when the new counterstrike comes out. 1.6 players hate source Source players hate cs:go Cs:go players hate cs2 Cs2 players will hate the new counterstrike that comes out in 10 years

agreed

execs are aliases are power tools that have their specific uses. Reimplementing common gameplay use patterns of the commands as game mechanics is the right move, but taking away the power tools is not.

In a way, you can see it as trying to balance the playing field. I get this might be an obscure example, but someone who really researches config parameters might find one that gives them a 10-15 percent boost in FPS. This begs the question as to why it's not in the game by default. Less obscurity and abstractions is better in my opinion, even if you do feel like you have a reduced sense of control (which is probably more perception than reality).

Same. I got into coding because of csgo as well :D

​@@BOSSDONMAN Bad example, one could also just go out buy a top of the line gaming rig and boost their fps by 200% "Leveling the playing field" doesnt apply here

I wouldnt play ranked tbh, play more faceit

just play casual and chill don't go to compi blackhole

stop caring about virtual ranks just detach and play the game

@@9akslebws that is exactly my plan! hopefully it'll work 👀

"I hope i won't go into the same, old, dark place as I once been in." 😂😂😂

you're exactly right, and imo this is because you have no idea where smokes/flashes go because there's no visual tracer after you throw it. Unlike valorant where you can just play and organically improve, you NEED to go into a custom lobby to practice lineups. Smokes in CSGO are like building in fortnite, not something you can ignore. It's absolutely necessary if you want to have any competitive edge whatsoever. I know for a fact a lot of people don't want to do the busy work of going into a lobby and staring at lamp posts at the correct pixel etc, and this directly turns people off from the game

@@nawtmyrealnamelol Good luck getting anybody in the CS community on board with that idea. Remember, this is the same community that thinks punishing accidental right-mouse clicks with suppressed weapons adds to the skill ceiling.

gotta give cs some credit, they have little things like ranked short matches, Valorant barley just got unranked short matches

@@qu1253 yea it'll never happen but it would objectively make the game better. It's just a shame

@@nawtmyrealnamelol Even as someone who doesnt play CS competitively at all and likes all the things being added to help casual players, needing a piece of UI to show you where your grenades will land is dumb and completely unnecessary. That's why the vast majority of games don't do it. All you need to know is how far your character throws grenades, and everything past that, gamers are capable of figuring it out easily enough themselves.

True

The good days

Skill gap is by definition the subtraction of the skill ceiling minus the skill floor, so if things become easier at the bottom, then the skill gap compresses. You need to choose.

hey i know you

@@adrianoss.bougas3720 More focus will be on tactics and aim. Instead focusing on ain control / smoke,s landing vs tickrate. Most of the things fixed make it esier for poeple to know where there heard or how to do spray control. It just reduces the time they need to lurn that shit. If they play long anough they would have lurned it any way

​@@adrianoss.bougas3720 I think you can have both, the right way to do accessibility is maintaining the "skill gap" but building a ladder of sorts that makes it "simple" and clear how to close that skill gap as much as possible. Imo.

@@adrianoss.bougas3720 Ok, if the skill gap is closed by adding things like a clear indication of how spread works or making bind-based mechanics possible to pull off without binds, then that's a very, very small amount of difference that's probably worth making.

I doubt they would add any smoke tutorials that’s part of the skill curve imo but I agree on the visibility

They have the nade preview now, it'll make it much easier to learn nades. And those change (and there are lots of them) so a tutorial doesn't really make sense.

With the grenade previews, you won't even need a tutorial for smokes! You might discover your own smokes!

i'm with you on that feeling, i haven't had the change to try cs2 yet, but i feel like they are killing what took many of us so long to master and discover, which for me was really exciting, to make an experience everyone can enjoy but not exploit to it's limits, idon't know if i'm explaining mself correctly, but yeah xD

​@@darkcust4478there will still be exploits and new exploits to discover and now with no sky boxes more insane line ups it isn't the death if anything it's just the "future"

The game industry/gaming as a hobvy is bigger than it was 10 to 20 years ago. Less niche and more commercialized/mainstream. This is how it goes. I doubt valve will fully abandon their OG fans like you by removing game customization.

what is your rank?

@@reminagyo2973 Lmao, giving the valve corporation special treatment for literally no logic reason. Valve has screwed over their OG fans dozens of times. Not updating CS to source 2 for almost a decade despite making them more money. Not developing a real anti-cheat, instead introducing the trust factor system that false flagged toxicity as cheating (by design). Dropping game breaking changes without any notice and then reverting them as if it was their idea. Not doing anything to fix the broken ranks in NA for almost 5 years, then the entire rank distribution update that ruined matchmaking in NA and after a year it still has not recovered (anyone with a brain would know the only fix was a full reset). Now CS2 that has so many incremental negative changes that lower the skill ceiling going against what every OG player wanted.

What is KZ?

@@BionicXAngel its basically just all the movement gamemodes like bhop, surf, climb, etc

@@q6x Oh, got it. Thanks. 👍

@@BionicXAngel KZ is, in short, a PvE game where you try to go from the start to the end of an obstacle course map as fast as possible using all of CS game physics features such as airstrafe, bhop, surfs,... It's also known as climb because most KZ maps usually involve you going up, hence climb.

Good stuff! Hopefully Valve will update its community server browser. I look forward to playing more community maps when CS2 comes out, and to see what exciting & creative stuff you guys come with.

Exactly what I was thinking. New animation and why not also remodel the guns? Make them look a bit cooler/more modern? Also update the gun sounds would be awesome. Right now it’s too much like CSGO to really feel new

​@@juliusjacob1416I don't want to be a jerk here but being an active cs player since 99, it actually took me a while to accept the new csgo, even if I agree it is a very good cs. I have never understood why the new skins, colourful weapons and the new graphics were so important if it wasn't about the money. This obsession for the NEW product and the money can make, it is understandable from a business point of view but it isn't for me. I just want to play cs. I don't care about the majority of bugs, old graphics, etc. In time they have transformed a simple game like cs in something else. Do not name it Cs 2, just name it something else. You know, starbucks is not selling you italian coffee, it is just something else even though some (or probably most) of their products use words that sound italian even spanish. Wtf is a frapuccino anyway (i don't even know how to spell it correctly).

@@juliusjacob1416 he sayed in the video why because of the skins

i have .cfg for nade practice and every time i want to throw nades i'll just type exec and if they removed that then i have to paste the commands everytime to console and enter it haha

True, long time players are mad cause they lose their advantage if not has less advantage due to fear of change or something new. While new players may still see it just as technical as ever and need a lot of tweaks as ever as before, and "Nah I'll just continue playing CoD"

I agree with you, but I dont agree with your blackjack analogy as its not a team gsme, and only you (and your luck) are the reason that determines if you win or lose in a session of Blackjack

@@shiimu I think you perhaps didn't fully get the blackjack analogy. Why it works doesn't have to do with whether the complainers are right or if it's a team game. What I am saying is in applications, which is all that matters, when you ever from basic strategy at the casino table the plother players groan and will blame their bad draw on you because they believe they shoulda got your card had you for example passed according to basic stray. Ppl are very superstition and illogical but in application the ppl are what matters in the example because I'm making the point that these ppl perceived they are being wronged by the other player he doesn't need to be a team mate for the analogy to work. I'd also add those ppl aren't wrong either, not totally. They are wrong over the long haul but they are correct in the instance in which the noob black jack player stole the face card they needed for 21. I'd like to add it seems like by your comment you don't know what basic strategy is or does. It doesn't make the game 50/50 but it makes it darn close and in the rare case of single deck or low deck games you can overcome the house edge with the addition of counting cards and betting accordingly. That's a mathematically fact the MIT team proved. Anyways basic strategy is real and expected of you at a table with the hardcore players. If you don't know what it is look into black jack basic strategy and why it works. Then if you want look into counting cards and when and why it works. Black jack is a game of how much to bet and when it isn't a game of what to do when. The math tells you what to do. That's basic strategy. From there the game is just about variation of bet amounts from a player perspective

my ADR is changing from 20 to 120 every round tf

How was the first round when i slapped your team with a quad headshot ;)

I tried playing CS:GO after discovering WarOwl's channel. First match, 2 of my 4 teammates started throwing after losing the pistol round, and the other 2 kept arguing over voice chat to the point I couldn't hear myself think. I quit after that. Think I'm better off just experiencing CS vicariously. Maybe FaceIt's better, but I ain't paying a monthly fee for that, and I hear even FaceIt level 1s have like 2,000+ hours in the game.

@@qu1253 why would you pay for faceit?

@@qu1253 not sure why anyone would seriously stay in level 1 when playing for a few weeks

@@qu1253 you don't have to pay for faceit, also if you don't have the patience to sit through some bad games to get better and experience just how good the game is when it goes well then that isn't necessarily a fault with the game, play some casual, deathmatch and scrimmage if you want, that way the atmosphere will be relaxed and there's no consequence towards winning or losing, you can improve at your own pace without too much pressure.

@@qu1253 Faceit is free. And if anything playing with and against players with 2000+ hours is a good thing, if you go into the games willing to learn something rather than rage if you get destroyed that is.

you can make a custom resolution in nvidia for 1440x1080 which gives you high res but still 4:3 stretched

“The only reason many people use 4:3 is because if the lower fov” this is just completely false dude idek why or how you came up with this statement… people play in 4:3 stretched because of how models and hit registration works on the source engine, it’s old and because of the fact it’s old it doesn’t have some advancements like disabling the advantage you get from having wider player models, in csgo if it’s wider on your screen then it is factually easier to hit, some modern games have fixed this advantage like fortnite, valorant, r6, overwatch, etc. you still get the visual appeal without the competitive advantage. So no, people do not play stretched because of the fov it’s literally because it’s easier to hit people with wider hitboxes in source engine games

@@nosensetj you have no idea what you're talking about, just because the models look bigger doesn't make the actual hitboxes bigger, that's like saying getting closer to your screen makes the characters look bigger to its easier to hit.

@@nosensetj Hit boxes are the same no matter what resolution you use thye just look bigger

You can change your view model that somewhat mimics fov slider, you’ll see more or less of the screen depending on what you prefer

Yeah same, it would be gun that would take skill to use properly. It would add a lot of flavour and didn't destroy game balance.

Ye m14 for ct and sks for t

I'd also like to finally get a replacement for the Glock and Ak47 like maybe instead be able to choose an M1911 and for the AK maybe just a more modern one like the AK12 or something like that.

The M14 was infamously uncontrollable on full auto, though. I think it'd make more sense as a semi-auto sniper alt personally. The Tavor would be a fun alt skin for the FAMAS imo. Or the British L86A2. T's being able to use like the Grease Gun, or MP40, as a SMG would be rad too. Fitting too, since traditionally these paras use whatever they can get and old surplus is still being found and sold cheap.

@@0lionheart i think it would be fine alternative to galil/famas as semi auto. Just like cz to tec/57. It would be like more accurate deagle that one taps from every range. That would be fun

u joking? its objectively worse. there is huge rubber band and peekers advantage. u cant spray or awp because of this. u play on complete delay. must be noob since u feel its faster. Maybe enemies are just slower.

@@mytis123 lol

​@@colly6022 U r silver

@@NOU-iw3gb yeah, i tend to play on community servers and smaller matches with friends. i don't waste every waking hour in competitive. problem?

Yup. The game being easier to read doesn't take anything away from the skill needed to play at high level, but makes it easier for players to get into the game in the first place. And starting out is incredibly hard.

Yeah, i agree. Its better to just let the games advertise themselves - with the help of the fan base - rather than making marketing schemes. Valve is big enough that they can afford it.

This ^

So like in CS:GO where the follow recoil crosshair is behind sv_cheats 1?

@@serhiy-serhiiv Can't use sv_cheats in casual gamemodes like deathmatch/casual or most community servers, so it was kind of useless outside of workshop maps.

This is the right approach, I dont want to be forced to use it if it gives everyone an advantage

Yeah, seeing that molotov throw fel really disappointing... game looks brand new in so many aspects, but nicer looking molotovs than this have been a thing for years now.

At the same time not a whole load of people really like all the nerdy stuff, since all the nerdy stuff like that often becomes too good to not have and ends up forcing everyone to have it, otherwise they get left out.

but its still too much to ask for the general population to have to look up codes they dont understand to do things they don't know would give them much of an advantage, this strikes a nice medium where not every noob will immediately know you can do jumpthrows correctly so when they time it right its an achievement all to itself for them to do.

​@@simplysmiley4670 this is a video game. We're fucking nerds.

that jump binding was annoying to be fair. You probably just felt like you got "used to it"

They can add more variants to swap with an existing weapon like MP7|MP5 cz75 five seven or m4a1 to m4a4

Aksu as ak switch. More character speed, costs 2500, can't one shot in distance, remaining hs one taps in close and medium ranges

csgo is now tf2

Everybody will be playing with AK anyway

@@MaximTsyba i would play my version as i am playing on small screen and fast movement and small cost would be perfect fit for me

CS2 defintely shortened the skill gap between players but not as much as people think it would The follow recoil feature is a noob friendly feature but really it's kinda on par or even overshadowed by other important things to be learned in the game

to be fair most of those commands are completely unnecessary now, the biggest one was jumpthrowing which is now an extra skillcheck for the better players.

yes. Taking away the choice and instead forcing one solution down their throats its very dangerous. We were already used to having the console and everything it can do; and configs and aliases are a huge part of that, especially when messing around on a local server it gave a lot of freedom. You can't take that away or people will get very mad. Personally i hate what they did with the decals (blood and bullet holes), because in cs:go you could choose not to clear them, and potentionally benefit by the added information- sometimes seeing where someone got hit, or where a bullet hit the wall is vital information on where the enemy may have gone. And removing them obviously has the benefit of spotting the enemy more easily. The point is that we had a choice and now we're all forced to have one thing, wether you like it or not

It fucks with certain niches outside of competitive too, kz, bhop, surf, and longjump players will no longer be able to use longjump or nullbind. (regardless of the controversy on nullbind)

@@flamingninja728 Exactly. I use config files to switch between two very different sets of binds for Normal fps gameplay and for when I'm surfing. Not only that, but aliases are necessary for certain things like toggling between different crosshairs while in-game and switching a keybind between different actions. If they don't bring back aliases and executables, it will ruin the experience of a lot of players.

I think it's good that you can actually see where your bullets are going, it'll help people learn the recoil patterns faster than looking bullets in a wall and tracing it. You basically have to learn patterns outside of matches currently, whether it's images of pattern lines or shooting at walls for minutes since you can't have a clue what the patterns are without doing either, so follow recoil sound like a more natural solution for this issue imo. For sure it'll change things like longer lasting sprays with guns like the mac being more viable in all level of play but for the most part this will just help lower skilled players learn patterns.

@@deidrop1221 reducing skill a lot. bye bye cs shooting feel

@@GymAndFitnessFacts sounds like someone's afraid that new players are gonna actually catch up with their skill level and whoops their ass huehuehue

@@GymAndFitnessFacts There's no "reduction in skill" here. Learning the patterns would always be the most efficient way to play. The feature only helps newer players get better at the game quickly. Scared?

It doesn’t make a difference.. every pro and higher ranked player knows the recoil pattern. And realistically, you only need to know the first 10 anyways. Aiming isn’t what makes you competitive at higher ranks because it’s already a requirement, game sense is what separates the good from the great.

@@TacticalDimples not all of us are higher ranked players, 90% of people are going to have to use it if it gives them the advantage. And I don't want that to become meta for the 90% of us, because I will be at a disadvantage(Im not going to use it). Its fine as a learning tool but it's bad if people start relying on it

@@TacticalDimples Absolute bullshit. Even pro players struggle to know the recoil spread past 15 bullets. And pro players definitely don't know the spray pattern of every SMG out there, again, especially half way through a mag. These are people who get payed a ridiculous amount just to play the game, and practice it for hours daily... Realistically, you can have one or two gunfights a game where you go past the first 10, and in those situations a crosshair that shows the recoil will be invaluable. As someone who's played in GE and Faceit LVL10, recoil pattern knowledge is restricted to the first half of the mag with the rifles, and their favorite SMGs. I very rarely meet players who know the recoil spread on the Famas and Galil. Not to mention, it is very hard to 'recover' a spray after you go wrong. Again, even at high ranks. These are all things that would change with this crosshair. Simply put, it would give a huge advantage and people would have to start learning how to play with it ASAP for the consistency it brings. People will probably start with it on a toggle, then after getting used to it, would play with it 24/7 and there would be no need to learn any recoil patterns. I really hope they do not add it to comp and just keep it as a training/practice tool.

@@TacticalDimples you're wrong for the previously described reasons.

What sounds better, learning a recoil pattern bc you can see your crosshair move to where the bullets are going, or staring at bullet holes in a wall and trying to trace the opposite. Follow recoil will only help people learn recoil faster than before and only makes the game easier for lower skilled players and would only slightly affect higher level players. The ability to see where your bullets are going shouldn't be so controversial