Some specific parts have, others have not

No it has not. 😊

Largely thanks to Republicans in congress that support Putin.

​@@mikelimtwlol

@@mikelimtw nope. they kicked into a wartime stance and also adapted to a lot of things.. this definitely didn't age well

They have basic mistakes like "tiers" instead of "tires"

now Russia is fighting with Ukraine, which is being helped by the entire NATO bloc, they supply all sorts of PMCs, weapons, volunteers, money, etc., RUSSIA just HUMILIATED you, look at the losses of Ukrainians, and the cemeteries of fascists are flourishing there

​@@Zapper-kq1zgok... How is avdiivka? How come Zaporhizia not fully taken?

@jastark22181 No worries, the US & OTAN are busy destroying themselves. The RF only needs to stay calm and wait.

Hey buddy , you made comment before six months about NATO superiority . Talk to me more 😂😂 Didnt aged well

What do you define as “winning,” Dennis?

​@@dryfox11You wouldn't know even if it hit you in your face fox

@@dryfox11They are decimating Ukranian army such a rate people expecting a break on Ukranian army... I don't think any break will happen and this war will continue many many years if US support continues...

​@@cemyurdakul1128if they were decimating it how come they haven't taken more land? But the u.s just sent 80 billion in aid. This will be too much for Putin to sustain for more than a couple more years . Unless he gets great help from allies .

@@cemyurdakul1128only russia can lose on average 800-1,000 troops per day, and still send trainloads of conscripts to the chipper shredder with smiles on their faces.

Home by Christmas..... joe

When he said russia is losing

When he said russia is losing

(powerful) invisible Ukraine Navy is 3x better than super power Putin's Navy. . .ha ha ha!

Handicapped? Are you stuck in the 1950s? 🙄🤦🏼‍♂️ Imagine referring to oneself with a negative, diminutive, outdated term…SMH.

​@jessehachey2732 😂😂😂😂 ok br9

Not only that, but in application, if the Pentagon said it had sent 12 ---- it's actually "20" on the publicly verified media --- it usually means it had sent 25 or 35. We know Norway, Italy, Germany, France, & Britain also have, combined, provided Ukraine over 26... and most of those from those nations are the track mounted with 12 rockets... so while they're a bit slower, they have twice the punch as the truck-mounted US provided of 6 missiles... so you're talking about 50 to 75 units of HIMARS/MLRS that have been operating in Ukraine for the last 12 months+, at least. But it's the US military intel satellites feeding GPS coordinates to those HIMARS/MLRS that's making it so difficult for Russia to hide valuable assets and senior officers in the front line. Having over 55 colonels and generals killed in a small "special military operation" is NOT a small thing, despite Trump's "genius" friend Comrade KGB Col. Putin's seemingly calmed public manner. Norway, Denmak, and the Netherland likely will provide close to 60 F-16; and Sweden could do a 5-8 Gripen donations, too. Plus, any European nation that has F-16s that they want to retire, likely will jump on board, since giving them to good use in Ukraine will earn them tons of credits towards their application for the F-35s and one F-35 is worth at least 3 F-16s, due to the stealth jet's sophistication... so you're talking about between 75 to 100 F-16s jets arriving in Ukrain by late summer 2024... Not enough to win the air war but those assets, plus the dozens of Patriot & comparable anti-aircraft/anti-missile systems across Ukraine mean NO RUSSIAN fighter jet or helicopter is going to freely fly headlong into Ukraine, by the summer of 2024... Unlike Russia and its S-300/S-400 and its fighter jets, which seem to be operated by different people not in coordination --- with many jets of their own being shot down by the Russians themselves --- F-16s and the Patriots & other comparable radar and anti-missile systems are NATO weapons platforms, so they work seamlessly, once the Ukrainians have learned to use them...

​@@kiabtoomlauj6249 what did you even write there. Seeing all of that, I could say that you're American ? Reality is Ukraine is getting out of reserves, they are forcing people to fight. Also Ukraine demanded some EU countries to deport back everyone who is combat available. Most of their frontlines are colapsing, they don't have manpower, machinery, logisitcs are failing, everything is falling apart. If they didn't have NATO support this would have been done long time ago. Also, Russian Tornado system has a higher reach than HiMars

Don’t be where you were a minute ago - himars units

@@kiabtoomlauj6249 - Your story sounds impressive, but the USA & Allies have a major weakness for ALL of their Military, and it's called GPS. Chinese killer satellites are already positioned to take down the GPS system when they invade Taiwan. Meanwhile the Russian GLONASS system is accurate enough for their Hypersonic Missiles to eradicate any NATO targets.

Like boxing

Given his respect of scenario and circumstances around the logistical effort that went into supplying the USSR 2 1/4 billion tons of via the treacherous route from the east coast of the US to the Russians naval base in Murmansk

I though it was Blackjack Pershing in 1915 who said "...infantry wins battles but logistics wins wars."

@@billbellell9462 That has probably been said by commanders for thousands of years.

@@billbellell9462 yes and no we had ample amounts of both men and material resources during Vietnam Afghanistan and Iraq those wars were unwinnable situations when political factors are involving themselves in the process infact there hasn't been war that was won by either infantry or logistics since world war 2 was fought every single conflict has ended in stalemates or was politically unpopular to continue fighting it and you can try and find one that has but if you look it's all the pen being mightier than the sword the only way to achieve success in gaining control of a system is through unrestricted political warfare and winning the hearts and minds of the target population by any means necessary be it by manpower,material might, ideological indoctrination or all three applied at once infantry win battles logistics win campaigns and political subterfuge makes the war's appear winnable at all when there's no clear winner in a war both sides exhaust tremendous amounts of men and material resources often in vein for trivial pursuits that benefited no body but Banking families and financial brokerage firms and hedge funds

Yes, but most are not as prominent as Pershing, so we tend to remember what he said and not what they said. What I find interesting but sad is the Russians do not seem to understand this concept. Their logistics are at best terrible. In a few weeks or months Russian logistics may be eliminated as the Russians cannot seem to protect their logistic routes. Spending 20 years in the Navy taught me a lot about logistics and showed me their value. No US military unit ever deploys without suitable logistics as unit effectiveness depends on it. It is hard to fire a mortar without any ammunition. I see this as Russia's fatal flaw. The logistics for a submarine going out to sea is a massive undertaking. I cannot even imagine the logistics for a regional theater of war. I believe probably the best logistics were during the allied push into the European continent during WWII. The Big Red One ran trucks 24/7 from Normandy to the front lines. Now, that is logistics. The allies apparently did not suffer from Russia's logistical failings.@@davidlium9338

🐑🐑😁😁😁😁😁😁😆😆

Summer offensive losses essentially chewed through the entire force of NATO trained troops at least up to 17,000/18,000 dead and 35,000 additional wounded +the loss 25%of the IFV's 43% of AFV's 2 Challenger 2's 7 leopard 2A6's completely lost and just from the start of June to October 1st and those numbers aren't coming from from Russia there coming from the international center for strategic studies based off 25 hours of Ukrainian drone imagery released from June 1st to October 1st recognition of the 43rd mechanized brigade the Ukrainian armed Force of the most elite NATO trained and equipped force with mraps mine clearing vehicles mic-lics m4s and NATO body armor gen 3 night vision and thermal Scopes

@joshuacarrera6440 Ah yes, that must be why Russia is taking five to one armour losses, because Ukraine has nothing left. You Vatniks live in your own world.

thorough if you don't know anything AT ALL about what is actually happening. In the real world this is about as accurate as reading LORD OF THE RINGS to understand the developments and progression of WW2.

and they are still losing!

lol u just sent CIA 10$ WASTE

😘

I love u to

Shhhh..... don't tell anyone but thar information is all over youtube and telegram... i definitely wont tell anyone and i definitely won't mention that Hamas's attack on israel was probably supplied and funded and planned by the Russians in order to distract the world while they prepare their next move .... maybe

Cardboard? 😂 nah they’re plywood…🤦🏼‍♂️

And wooden tanks )))))

What is "IT"

A clown

There’s a reason we don’t have free health care

New meaning to the words "reach out and touch someone!"

😉

you caught that also....yeah, could be one way or the other....lol

This does tell a lot about yourself.

Translate to English.

@@JSFGuy LOL. Noice is literally like a similar word for Nice

@@Savinuplayz oh... Well it should say what it means then, there is a translate tag on it.

Arrogance and alcohol damage

😂 you’re on the wrong channel then there buds! Infographics is an animation, y’know, graphics type of channel…🤦🏼‍♂️

It didn't destroyed russia that much but ukrine is got rekt

An unexpected ERB reference had been made. Season 2 finale

So is that why zelensky has resorted to rounding up every elderly man and every teenager and now women to throw them at artilary fire?

Semper Gumby

Funny you say that. HIMARS can be used onboard transport ships at sea.

Fr

This whole piece is curated to bolster American support for the proxy war.

It was out for 1 minute when you come in, you haven't watched it yet so how do you know it's great? You must first watch the video to know.

​@@JSFGuybecause that's a BOT account

Thats an intelligence service. He never fought in a war. I assume he was recruited from an university.

Putin graduated from college in 1975 with a law degree. He immediately joined the KGB after graduating, serving as an intelligence officer at several international postings. He reached the rank of lieutenant colonel with the KGB (which used military ranks although an intelligence agency). Like all Soviet citizens, Putin served a short, compulsory tern in the Soviet military, but did not serve in combat.

Thanks for sharing that knowledge. Finally the fact that the 🇺🇸 and 🇩🇪 version are slightly different (hence the 🇩🇪 being called MARS, later upgraded to MARS II) makes sense, for some reason any multinational project either splits in two national ones, building on prior joint developments (like Abrams & Leopard 2) or they result in different versions of the system, like with the NH90. I don't think this inability to agree on one common design is helpful, as could be seen with 🇩🇪 scrambling to have an 🇺🇸 company upgrade at least some of their MARS II for the M31 GPS-guided missile in time to send to 🇺🇦, as the Bundeswehr had neglected updates made with the 🇺🇸 HIMARS during that unfortunate decade of shrinking budgets and new requirements. Primarily the requirements from the US to have partners with capabilities for asymmetric warfare like in Afghanistan. At times 🇩🇪 had almost 10,000 soldiers stationed there, which the MoD only managed to finance by brilliant decisions like dismantling an independent Air Defense, selling those Gepards that 🇩🇪 (and recently the 🇺🇸) are now scrambling to buy back at 2-3 times the price they were sold for by 🇩🇪 15 years ago.

And them they hit innocent Russian speaking Ukrainians with them.

@@vjsuxujrix9245 You mean like the president?

Our wepons in Ukraine were proven inferior to Russian ones. Idk what people are talking about but situation on the battlefield is clear . Our gear is joke. Just over hyped and overpriced

@@5tre55full I call you a paid Russian troll because I have seen German equipment outclassing Russian Equipment by two Generations and the M270 is a joint development between the US and Germany although the German version is called MARS/HiMARS. The sheer range, precision and reliability is incredible, the PzH2000 has been seen firing 100.000 shells with the same barel while only becoming slightly less precise and a range of 56 and 72km is two to three times higher than the russian systems. The light US M777 on the other hand is light, easy to handle, cheap and numerous and is able to fire nearly the same range but is unarmored and not self propelled.

U think this is unbiased?😂

Did you just say unbiased? Do you know what it means to be biased. Let me tell you something, if you're human, you're biased to some degree. So this man must be God lol. That's how people get tricked, go read a book.

@@brent123456yo I think me meant "unbiased"

When the war is over let me say this biased channrl will surely be demoted

You need to use those eyeballs and ears and fire a flak cannon WW2 style. Look up footage of how the USN intercepted kamikaze planes during WW2.

Fuel is the major logistical problem for any army. Russia just sends it - need it or not. Until Himars takes out the supply trains.

@@rolandxor179 The US also had RF detectors (essentially primitive radar) on those flak shells so they would detonate when close to enemy planes. If you want to know how well eyeballs and ears work, look at how well the Japanese AA worked against American planes. That is to say: not very. And that's against WWII planes, you think it'll be easier or harder to pull off the same thing with a modern jet moving at supersonic speeds and shooting from beyond visual range?

@@plmokm33 It's impossible too high and too fast. You will be torn to shreds by a A-10 Warthog and not hear the prrrrrt of the 30mm cannon. I would guess some form of IR passive detection is probably the least demanding energy wise.

@@rolandxor179 Right, so going VFR isn't really that practical with AA.