Is this also a scam?

Don't forget the EU money does NOT include The UK. We in the Uk gave £4.6Billion last year, Thus far this year we have given £3Billion, that means we should spend 3 times as much this year.

I don't think that's real Artur the SU-25 & The Drone , Only Because there was no wake / back blast that effected the drone at all .. maybe it was zoomed in a bit I'm no expert or anything But i thought the drone would have fell or spun or moved ... Like you see when people stand behind a big plane or a jet it blows everything & everyone over can be really dangerous the Thrust But it could be zoomed in & Did not pass as close as it looks like in the video.. If its real & It had of took down that Frogfoot It Would have been Amazing , A Red on Red DGI Taking out a Frogfoot Lol I My Self Am going to Enjoy a Few Pints too My Friend , Enjoy your Friday You earned it Thanks For all the vid's I never take a single one for Granted buddy! Enjoy Your weekend & Ill see You on Monday!!

@arturrehi : NASAMS uses the same missiles as US jet fighters : AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9 Sidewinder...

@@Jay-O_Carlow Agreed. Flying that close would tumble a drone. Still, even if zoomed way out, it's a great video.

Great vid this morning, Sam!

Admiral Yi Sun Shin is in my opinion the best admiral in world history.

acctually the turtle tank has proven quite effective against drones, clustermunitions and infantry anti tank weapons. The concept is similar to cage armour but on steroids. It walked into i belive Krasegorovka virtually unopposed.

@@noahz3429 as funny as it may look it is affective.

its a massive slowing down hunk of steel, which puts strain on the engine and transmission

If they attack the refineries, they cannot fill those tanks.

Shows what you know. It was all over the news last week. Obiden ordered Ukraine to stop damaging russias oil refin. Obiden knows high gas prices will influence the voting public. Obiden has so far failed to illegally eliminate his rival so he has to get Ukraine to stop destroying fuel refinery.

If it wasn't demamded, so why such attacks haven't been performed before US aid stopped? And why there are no more such attacks after the aid has been resumed? I know, the diplomatic language and all, but let's not pretend we don't see what's happening in reality.

The attacks did continue.​@@oleksandrbespalov9713

"Demanded" is too strong, but they did ask them outright and publicly to stop, although I think it's an unreasonable request.

The toy doesn't look like the picture on the box.

That “tank” is some WW1 level crap right there..

​@@davidallison5204thats a t 72 with a anti drone .

@@user-rc6io6vp6i well yeah, but the results looks so retro…

@@davidallison5204 but they are successful.

so come here and fucking give us it

Not sure if that would still be true if the political will was there. Because that's missing the most. Look at recent polls, eg. how few young Germans would be willing to defend Germany with weapons in their hands - very few. If Scholz did what Arthur proposed and said "3% for the military tomorrow, vote for me", the pro-ruzzian, fake "for peace" AfD would win with over 50% of the votes (they're now polling around 30%) and Scholz would be gone. So many people here in Western Europe still haven't woken up and think that putler would stop after Ukraine. Same in my country Austria, we recently joined the European sky shield initiative. We don't really have air defense but ironically we have very good sensors and radars that can detect incoming missiles and stuff over most of Europe (apparently our system can actually look even quite far into Ukraine). So the deal is kinda we do the detecting and other countries do the shooting down and together we protect the EU. And the reaction of many people here? "Omg, our government is selling out our neutrality, the only thing that would really protect us". As if neutrality were some kind of magic cloak from Harry Potter. 🤦‍♂️ The average person is stupid. And our politicians qnd media being bad at explaining things and ruzzian influence on social media running stupid misinformation stories doesn't make it better at all. People are all why can't we be friends with ruzzia, look at gas prices at the pump, it's so expensive.

People realize it .That’s why the various parliaments should have started taking things seriously two years ago .

Lots of infrastructure required for production at large scale. It’s unrealistic to upscale in the short term. If we can get our politics tamed down we can get things moving.

Euros are all talk and little action. They may have the combined population of 3x ruzzia but all of them except france would get overrun 1v1 vs ruzzia.

For the algorithm, for the good mood, and for peace, freedom and democracy: Have a beer, both Artur and you!

I agree with you but at the same time I am 57 and encourage everyone not to do any drugs or alcohol. It never ends with a good result. Just try to have fun with a clean life ❤

I downvoted so I negated your bot attempt

@@TheRealBillBob ~ Oooo! You're just too cool for school.

Saudi Arabia will have a hard time buying parts for their US made military hardware. Oh forget getting your hands on F15Ex or F35's.

Great comment

The more the United States produces an oil. At the moment we are producing more oil than any country in history. Then the less effect OPEC actions have on the markets. I used to be a professional trader in crude futures and options. In addition to the outcomes you stated they are desiring, maybe the most important one is that they want to influence our elections in order to hopefully get Trump elected

@@AceRamone Indeed.

This is true, although it should be remembered that a lot of those "petro-dictatorships" were set-up and continue to be propped-up by the West in order to maintain some level of control over the resources in question (eg prevent them from being used for the benefit and at the direction of the populations who supposedly own them), so it's not exactly as simple as you're presenting it to be. The West doesn't have a unitary set of values or goals, and, as the GOP just showed us in the most blatant way yet, large sections of the wealthiest classes in the West seem dead-set on destroying democracy so long as it might possibly lower their taxes a tad (thinking on why so many such people live in the West and not in the Randian stateless utopia of, say, Somalia doesn't seem to be a priority for such classes. Should they succeed in their mission, they'll regret that choice bitterly).

It's worse than that. Oil, and grease in kitchens, can be heated much higher than the boiling point of water while still remaining a liquid. So when water is thrown on the fire it instantly boils and turns to steam, effectively exploding, and showers the surrounding area with flaming oil particles which then spreads the fire.

To much Corruption and Lobbyism, best Example: Ursula von der Leyen, one of the biggest Crook in the last 20 Years!

Quote, "For the EU, not just an increase in military spending has to happen, ..." EU is a trade organisation, and it doesn't has a military. It's the member states who has a military. Moreover, The EU isn't a Federal State and is never going to be one, because e.g. the frugal Nordic states has a different opinion on how to spend money compared to the member states in the South.

wrong...

@@chadhaire1711 sorry if I spoke out of turn but it's just an observation.

@@chadhaire1711 Hi Troll

I think there’s a periscope that now only can see forward. I suppose the drones could use some kind of splatter bomb, some kind of sticky paint, to use on the window that the driver is using.

👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

The unfortunate reality is that until Russia is marching on them, they will only continue to do the bare minimum (to keep the US involved). Complacency is rampant in the EU and has been for decades. They were spoiled by the US defensive shield and nuclear umbrella. The fact they could do nothing better during that 7-month hiatus the US took highlights how incompetent and lethargic the major EU members have become. Its insanity how the major EU nations are riding on the backs of Eastern Europeans for their defense. Seems to me they found another nation(s) to parasytize off of now that they know the US caught on to their game. I mean, why actually try when there is someone else to do that work for you. Almost makes me not want to support aid for ukraine. But it's not Ukraines fault, and they shouldn't be punished for Western Europe's idiocracy. Maybe there needs to be a reshuffling of who the US helps after the dust settles. Perhaps we should shrink our involvement with the major Western European states and replace them with the Eastern states.

Euros are all talk and little action. UAs know they need US help to not get overrun (forget about liberating anything now). The problem is US help is finite. They've painted themselves into that corner where the US can throw them under the bus.

Yes I have to agree. I'm from the UK and I feel we're doing what we can but we just don't have a lot to give currently. Germany and france are giving stuff, but Germanys an odd one, western Europe has baby sat them and had military bases there since the second World War. They always produced huge amounts of stuff and had no real army to outfit with the stuff. Now that's changing and they're trying to shift back into having a relevant military, that might be why they're being less forthcoming than we'd all like. Just a thought really I can't provide evidence for the theory. What is Spain doing? They should be offloading half their aging hardware overnight, seen very little from them. Even Portugal was sending the odd tank etc while I was working out there over the summer. Anyway glad we're all allies. The Russians are bitter that no wants to associate with them, nothing changes.

You said it all I don’t need to say another word, it feels like they want to criticize the US for coming up with the Aide to late. They should have stepped up for their continent .

Standardisation is extremely important, that’s why all nato countries use 155 mm shells. Now that my country, Sweden, has joined Nato, you may find that the weapons we make are very cost effective. The glsdb was partly developed in Sweden and it costs no more than $40k each.

Europe doesn't have a long range system, we use patriot, but europe, at least Germany, produces different anti air systems. France and the UK have their own anti air systems, but I will focus on 2 from Germany, because one is in Ukraine, the other against drones is new. You usually have multiple layers of anti air. The first is long range for rockets, missiles, planes. High value targets. We use Patriot. A million per shot, at least. The 2nd is medium range, for cruise missiles and jets or bigger drones, helicopters. Germany produces IRIS-T. It's still hundreds of thousands per shot. You sometimes have also a short to medium range system, that shoots down smaller targets, like shahed drones. Israel has the iron dome, 40k per shot. You also can use jets with anti air weapons. And then there are short range systems. Guns, up to 4km range. On many bases and ships, there are gatling guns, that fire around 100 rounds per minute, and Germany has developed the MANTIS system. It fires munition with shrapnells, that explodes in the air, and can take out a whole swarm of FPV-drones with a single burst. So yes, we need more anti air, but europe produces some of the best anti air systems in the world 🤷‍♂️

AT missiles for all vehicles seems expensive as hell.

We ALREADY build and design an all European system: SAMP/T is better than the Patriot and 5x cheaper, tus, Aster-30 "only" ranges 120km, for €1m per pop... Patriot : PAC-2 : 160km, $5-8m PAC-3 : 20km, $2m PAC-3MSE : 35km, $3m... SAMP/T-NG is coming in 2025, will outgun PAC-2 and likely Russian S-300/400's 48N6, but wait, Aster-NT block.2 is planned for 2027... 2.5x the range and 2x the altitude of THAAD... It's made for exo-atmospheric interceptions up to 3000km ranged IRBMs at mid-course... For shorter range, there is MICA-VL : MICA-NG has longer range than AIM-120C used by NASAMS For even shorter range, Crotale Mk.3 does the job of Iron Dome but covers 800km² instead of 150km² Mistral ManPADS can have a non intrusive turret launcher named SADRAL, 50% faster and 50% more range than the Stinger Thales Rapid Fire and Oerlikon/Rheinmetall Millennium Gun do a one shot, one kill on FPVs, The MG shoots its 35mm AHEAD ammo at 1000 rpm, each separates into 152 tungsten pellets 10-30m ahead of the target. The RF only shoots 240 rpm but it's caseless 40mm CTAS with 200 pellets and... It's more polyvalent because there are anti-tank shells and the explosive ones are as powerful as a 90mm shell... At such rate of fire, you can do an artillery barrage from 8.5km... And now, Oerlikon proposes a HEL laser turret too... What we don't do are super long range ultra high altitude anti-ballistics : RIM-161D block IIA (US, $18m) ranges 1200km at up to 1050km altitude. Germany bought Arrow-3 from Israel ; same specs but the missile is much better for... $3m per pop... Poland and Romania have Aegis-Ashore with RIM-161D

@@leonnunhofer3453 EuroSAM France + Italy, not France + UK... Ukraine has 2 SAMP/T, maybe 3 now... And it's SAMP/T that shoots down Kinzhals : the footage clearly showed a vertical launch, Patriot can't do this...

exactly what i said.

Exactly, the wake of the jet would have most definitely knocked the drone from the sky. And there is no motion blur when you pause the video: you can see the underside of the jet quite clearly. That would be impossible with your average camera.

*crews not cruise 😉. The Russkies certainly won’t be heading to Aalborg for the World Firefighter Games this September 😂😂😂

Well, I’m pretty sure you had something to extinguish fires like water in tanks on your vehicles. Konstantin from ”inside russia” mentioned a fire where the firefighters eventually showed up but did nothing because they couldn’t afford water. When in America, he was impressed that firefighters actually did what they were supposed to do and acted completely professionally. Maybe it was you that extinguished the fire that was when he was there?

@@TheFrewah AFFF is not that expensive, is it? It's partially banned in the US so the market should be glutted.

😮💥😳🤭🤭🤭😂😂

😂 nazzi bothers..

@@nashbridges-cu6dy You too.

@@nashbridges-cu6dyrussia was allies with the nazis until the nazis betrayed them

@@hawkdubz3094 thats true.. actually entire Europe signed with nazzis.. accept UK France Poland and Yugoslavia although last 3 got military occupied. But Ukranians got world known nazzis in WW2.. famous Stephan Bandera and co.

So your tryna tell me the tank didn’t push to the center of Krasnohorivka and then support troops being loaded off there? Look at deepstate UA because that’s exactly what it did, it’s an anti drone tank and it does its job quite well.

​@winterinvicta anti drone yes anti Artillery we will see

@@aviationismylife6814 Bud it son vidoe takin several hits. Its an anti mine vehicle also. You gus cant really deny the existence of the videos of it being used. Ask yourself the question, why arthur rehhih wont show the maps anymore?

@attilamarics3374 let's see I seen the videos Russians are using jamming equipments on that tank so most drones fail to hit it. Second thing Ukraine for the last 6 months had to pick and choose what they can hit with artillery and what they can't so how about waiting and seeing then talking as if Russia already won.

@@attilamarics3374 it's not that they don't show the map. the guy shows the map at the beginning. the problem is that a lot of the pro-ukraine pages have been spinning the facts real hard to paint a different narrative and distract from what is really happening on the ground. for example, yesterday the algorithm recommended me a video from that "today there are a lot of important developments from the ali express online t-shirt store front" unknown dude that is supposedly "reporting from ukraine" and that spends most of his time whining about getting targeted by the "evil russian bots" after two years straight of trying to squeeze every last penny out of his audience by selling them crappy t-shirts and recycling his footage and reuploading it on dozens of different pages in dozens of different languages in order to make as much cash as possible as opposed to just adding subtitles like a normal person. and for example, the video that i saw yesterday was exactly the same nonsense with the ridiculous "wow! nice! genius ukrainian commanders set a trap for the russians and destroy super ultra top secret russian tank base! flawless execution, revolutionary tactics, major strategic victory, crimea victory beach party imminent!" titles. so it really makes me wonder about the stereotypical ukraine flag profile picture viewer whose superficial interest in this conflict is limited to just watching one of those little five minute "everything going perfectly according to plan, ukraine winning, russia dumb and incompetent and running out of missiles" videos every once in a while just to leave some "slava ukraine" before moving on.. because what kind of understanding could those people really have about what is happening on the ground? that page does show the map, but the dude always uses some fake map from weeks or even months prior with his own ridiculous made up drawings instead of the actual real current map. he does everything to avoid showing the advances that russia made in previous weeks, and then every once in a while he'll quietly add some extra red without mentioning it. and when that happens, it will never come with some "wow russia is advancing really fast, situation is dire for ukraine" title to actually inform his viewers and allow them to understand that the situation has changed and that russia has regained the momentum and that ukraine is now in a dire situation and losing ground pretty much across the entire front. nope, quite the opposite.. russia may have achieved a breakthrough and advanced by miles on a particular date and seized a key logistical hub for a bunch of little villages in a given area, but instead of just being fair and objective and "reporting from ukraine" like he's supposed to and informing people about that development, the dude will instead jump through hoops and bend over backwards in an effort to find some ultra-localized microscopic scale nonsense story about how "wow nice! genius ukrainian tank crew drove through powerful minefield and fired devastating shots at russian trenches! putin in tears, russia collapse imminent!" that happened in some unknown village that consists of like two corn fields and some barn and that hasn't seen any heavy fighting in like a year or something and that is located like five hundred miles away from where the russian breakthrough just happened.. he's down to literally bragging about how a single ukrainian tank managed to fire a couple of shots before quickly turning around and booking it straight back to the ukrainian lines without getting smoked. the lack of good news is so severe that such incidents are now considered major strategic victories by these pages that will report on them with a straight face and attempt to frame them as big achievements. so yeah, these pages have become kind of a joke.. maps from months prior, ukrainians always pulling off major victories against the incompetent russians, and yet if you were to actually look at even the fake outdated maps that they're showing each day in their videos, you'll see that russia is advancing. it's just that the title and what the narrator says never mentions it. it's always just a big red section that gets added on the map quietly alongside a title about some totally irrelevant local story about top secret tank bases and two rambo soldiers that held off a dozen russians on their own for a few hours in some unknown village or whatever story that has absolutely zero impact on the large scale picture. this leads to people having a totally warped perception of what is happening in ukraine, because if they don't watch anything else and don't know what the real map looks like, they're not gonna know that dude is showing fake maps from months prior and drawing most of the stuff himself.

He is a onesided propagandist bro shitting on russia is literally his only income.

Ultimate cope cage.

If it works it works.

Russian flag on Kiev soon

Publicly

You can’t mine your own supply lines you know. Russian shelling and mine vehicles quickly clear paths how do you think they reached Adiivka from the north mine fields.

Macray

@@OliverBootle1 micray👍🏻 As lang is Yir no a Campbell🤔🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿😉

😆

@@Kiltking I'm a highlander and i get what you just said. Very funny lol.not many will.

@@jasonhawthorne-gm6yn Makes perfect sense to me & I'm no highlander, just an average Aussie. Not a Campbell though- & just as well, cos my best mate's a McDonald. 😱😂

😮 oh yeah

Did you just come out from under a rock? Almost every European country has been criticized for their lack of military spending. The vast majority of Europeans actually laughed about it. Guess Trump was right. AGAIN.

double the ground pressure? it's corrugated steel panels. literally like 1/32 inch thick. it weighs nothing.

@@issadraco532 get a clue Ivan.

Exactly. They redirect your fears so you don't blame them. And if they were genuinely concerned about oil prices, they'd provide adequate public transport, but a lot of them don't- it sucks where I live in Australia; they've been bitching about how to fix it my entire life & I'm 47. There've been minor improvements (one thanks to my sister!), but it's still insanely difficult to live without a car like I do.

Okay maybe, maybe not, but it has to interfere with field of view and with battlefield awareness.

OK, but I would like to see data to compare how long it takes to modify the tank into a turtle and how long it lasts on the battlefield. It makes a perfect target.

@@Mark-ml3nv History legends did an amazing video recently on the effectiveness of the turtle tank. As he stated in the video," The Ukrainians made fun of the turtle tank until it went through their defensive positions, took fpv after fpv drones, started clearing minefields, and returned without being destroyed." Military innovation can't be underestimated or looked down upon.

@Mark-ml3nv it drove to the center of a Ukrainian city uncontested, it only stopped right in front of the Krasnohorivka industrial zone to drop off troops before turning back. As far as we know it’s one of the most effective tanks Russia has.

@@specter1549 How in the hell did that janky thing clear minefields without just becoming a terrain feature in the process.

Pushing UP daisies

On Pravda, or RU?

@@stevemcgowen good point. Don't remember. Read as I was falling asleep. Still curious if anyone else hearing this?

they left Oceretine, Russia made a breakthrough there without any problems

I think it’s something like two weeks consumption of junk food.

*just casually brings up how the u.s. was invading a sovereign nation* *doesnt at all connect that to the irony of the current situation* *carries on with same belief set*

Fighting a proxy war is not as expensive as the real thing. The UK, and the USA were spending £2million a month in Afghanistan in the 19870's/1980's. This was enough to beat the Soviet Union. That is around £20million a week now, roughly 10% of what the USA has just given to Ukraine.

​@@IconoclastXso are you saying that the US should not send aid to Ukraine because they themselves have invaded a country before?

@@hurrdurrherpderp3283 yes, its quite hypocritical for a much richer nation to bomb a poorer nation via proxy for doing what it did to get rich and powerful and then pretending to be on a moral high ground

I think so too. Very tempting to think focal length is the same as the human eye

Agreed. While the US has a much larger GDP than Europe, it's clear Europeans aren't doing their fair share. When Russia inevitably starts to encroach on NATO proper, there's a case to be made for American reluctance to participate in their defense.

Pop is useless when there is no political will. Europe is a talk and little action.

I think this view point should be recognized!!

Not sure where you get your information but I’m almost certain that UK has provided far more support for Ukraine than a measly half a billion. As for USA, they may not be first in the line of fire, but they are the target, the political rival of Putin and Russia. Who else is imposing sanctions and plotting their destruction? So you can stop this nonsense about USA being grand and generous by reason of their policies which allow them to be the global superpower.

"The 118th", is that the 118th Ukrainian mechanised brigade? A brigade has thousands of soldiers. If so, and if what you are saying is true, then something very strange is going on. Thousands of soldiers don't just disappear.

@OfficialPurpleStar I’ll give you a hint: it’s because the 118th no longer exists as a fighting force……….. probably shouldn’t get your military unit info from Wikipedia……….. just saying….

@@bkh8528 If you read what i put instead of just spouting bullshit to try sound big and clever... I said... "Not sure how true but i saw this on Combat Vet Reacts." So yeah BYEE!

@@Bob94390 Combat Vet Reacts did a whole vid about it. Not sure how true it is but if you watch the vid im sure he explaines it better than i do tbh. I agree with you though it is very strange!

Euros are all talk and little action.

Exactly. But these drones that follow this, Jake Broe, and any other grifter UKposts channel couldn't care less.

@@ruks7111 I’m a strong supporter of Ukraine, because Ukraine is an independent country that has a right to exist, and Russia illegally invaded. But what I don’t appreciate is how much artificial money we are spending for them.

It's not even close. This is clown show here

Yeah, 2% should have been enough, but it has been mismanaged for decades, not only by 3 female defense ministers. Don't not if „not a doctor“ von zu Gutenberg knew where the business end is.

If you call the airforce and no one shows up, you called the Luftwaffe

It does and it also makes it so much easier to see them.

That’s like saying a mine clearer vs a tank. It has a drone telling it where to go and it would probably retreat if an enemy tank were to appear. Which is quite unlikely as Ukraine has pretty much lost almost all of their soviet stock of tanks and their already low on the western donations.

they should paint it so it looks like a garden shed...........then it could hide in plain site lol

@@jasonhawthorne-gm6yn maybe add some loudspeakers with some "mooh! mooh!" sounds to better the disguise. 😀

@@TheFrewah Its a demining vehicle so its unlikely it would attack a tank.

I was thinking the same thing good gust of wind and it becomes a flying tank 😂😂😂!

That is not true, tanks were designed to kill other tanks among other roles....APCs carry troops !! And you will see it reduces the fighting ability of the Tank to fight effectively and I am a Tanker of 15 years experience including battle in combat !

@@capnfrankly yes it wont be effective against another tank but it will survive a little longer clearing a path tru minefield and making drone usage more difficult, thus assisting combat group.

​@@capnfranklyTank to Tank Combat is rare to see, especially in Ukraine. I don't think i have to say why. Get that into your head?

Should and should, Europe is toothless, pacified to the core, incapable to react fast enough...I wonder how NATO was ever planned to work when countries are this incompetent in general.

Europe it seems like doesn't even wake up after that. Which seems unfortunate, to say the least.

No motion blur of the jet fighter. Looks like CGI to me. Slava Ukraini!

in the middle of the sky? fake .....simple as.

Didn't SecDef Lloyd Austin say Ukraine "shouldn't escalate" by targeting them? Which was peak hypocrisy and selfish blindness btw?

@@xy6845 Not that I'm aware of. Date?

@@TroIIingThemSoftly Month ago or so. He definitely did say that. Which got me quite mad. No way this went over your head.