Thomas Kuhn | The Structure of Scientific Revolutions | Philosophers Explained | Stephen Hicks

  Переглядів 894

CEE Video Channel

CEE Video Channel

Місяць тому

In this seminal work, Thomas Kuhn(1922-1996), argues that science has little to do with experimentation and the impartial collection and analysis of data. Instead he argues that it has more to do with social and non-rational factors such as, accident and subjectivity. The primary activity of most scientists, he says, is doing "mop up work."
In the end, we may have to give up the notion of progress or truth in the sciences.
Timestamps:
00:26 The text
00:50 Key concepts
01:12 Kuhn as historian of science
03:06 The story we have been told-scientific progress
04:29 Historicism
05:29 A new image of science
05:53 Subjectivity, accident and peculiarity
06:21 Conclusions are determined by scientists' circumstances
07:00 Competing hypotheses are all scientific but also incommensurable
09:08 Arbitrariness is a formidable component
09:58 Mature science institutionalizes itself
11:14 Normal science-squeezing nature into conceptual boxes
13:27 Sometimes normal science reveals anomalies
14:11 A revolutionary stage arises
15:38 The new theory is never incremental
16:37 Chapter 2: More on normal science
17:18 A critical text is written
18:53 How do we prepare the next generation of scientists
19:50 What of an isolated student collecting data?
22:59 Nature of normal science-mopping up
26:12 What about students of science
27:32 Incompatible modes of community life
29:59 Changing paradigms
31:54 Competition of paradigms are not subject to argument
33:35 The language of open-mindedness must go
34:45 Religious language
36:10 Does science progress through revolutions?
38:21 Progress is a subjective notion
40:03 Science and politics
42:44 Is science about truth?
42:59 The concept of truth
Philosophers, Explained covers major philosophers and texts, especially the great classics. In each episode, Professor Hicks discusses an important work, doing a close reading that lasts 40 minutes to an hour.
The playlist of current videos can found here: • Philosophers Explained
Stephen R. C. Hicks, Ph.D., is Professor of Philosophy at Rockford University, USA, and has had visiting positions at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., University of Kasimir the Great in Poland, Oxford University’s Harris Manchester College in England, and Jagiellonian University in Poland.
Other links:
Explaining Postmodernism audiobook: • Explaining Postmoderni...
Nietzsche and the Nazis audiobook: • Nietzsche and the Nazi...
Playlists:
Education Theory: • Education Theory
Entrepreneurship and Values: • Entrepreneurship and V...
Nietzsche: • Nietzsche

КОМЕНТАРІ: 8
@johnbrown4568
@johnbrown4568 Місяць тому
Dr. Hicks thank you for this insightful overview of Kuhn’s work regarding “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” Well done indeed…
@user-jd6op7nb1p
@user-jd6op7nb1p Місяць тому
When I started off listening to this, all I heard were a long series of unsupported assertions that were nonsensical on their face. But as things went along I was drawn to Kuhn's new paradigm for what I can only describe as thinking-without-thinking. With the application of a bit of faith, I decided to make the "jump" to a new historical community abandoning those old worn out paradigms of facts, truth and objectivity. Tossing them aside, I felt a great weight lift from my shoulders and I "saw the light" so to speak. So now I'm off to the janitor's closet to grab the tools I'll need on my bold new journey! Anyone else in the group want to grab lunch? I'm a bit peckish and my forehead is warm. I may be feeling yet another paradigm shift coming on. But how would I know?
@austinmackell9286
@austinmackell9286 4 дні тому
Much closer to Lyotard, etc, than I'd realised.
@britneytezino3187
@britneytezino3187 19 днів тому
In Essence Kuhn was say shift from Linear paradigm to non- linear paradigm because nature herself is non- linear ❤
@Jules-Is-a-Guy
@Jules-Is-a-Guy Місяць тому
This understanding is probably the basis on which Eric Weinstein describes what's wrong with the scientific establishment, and its inordinate resistance to constructive paradigm shifts nowadays.
@TheNjsb
@TheNjsb Місяць тому
I wonder what Kuhn would have thought of Fauci.
@matthewrobertson7064
@matthewrobertson7064 Місяць тому
We may have to relinquish the notion that we may have to relinquish the notion that changes of paradigm that have been brought about through extensive evidence and free and rational argumentation bring scientific knowledge closer to the truth.
@Exodus26.13Pi
@Exodus26.13Pi Місяць тому
כְּכֹ֗ל אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֲנִי֙ ...Exodus 26:13 ≈ Pi... Moses was first to record Pi in 1440 BC. Josephus the Historian's description of the Tabernacle in 94 AD was inaccurate. This oversight was discovered in 2015 AD. 330 Exodus 26:8 eleven curtains each 30 cubits long 15 Exodus 26:12 one of the curtains is folded in half to 15 cubits long - 1 Exodus 26:13 makes Pi each curtain hang over/seam adds up to 1 cubit = 314 3.14 = 314 circumference/100 diameter ≈ π ratio (100 cubit court per Exodus 27:9-18) ................. This Wilderness Tabernacle archeological discovery is similar to the Dead Sea Scrolls and Martin Luther's 95 Theses. ................. History of finding π: -(1900-1680 BC) One Babylonian tablet indicates a value of 3.125 for π -(1650 BC) The Rhind Papyrus the Egyptians gave the approximate value of π 3.1605 -(1440 BC) Moses recorded Pi in the Exodus blueprints rediscovered in (2015 AD) 3.141592653... or Exodus 26:13 ≈ Pi -(500 BC) India's Aryabhata approximation was 62,832/20,000, or 3.141 -(429-501 BC) Zu Chongzhi a Chinese mathematician 3.1415926 - 3.1415927 -(250 BC) Archimedes from Syracuse showed between 3.1408 and 3.1429 ................. Pi's Exodus has been lost for over 3000 years. Even Josephus the Historian in 94 AD did NOT know Exodus 26:13 makes Pi to accurately describe the Tabernacle blueprints. He was describing the Temple's structure and NOT the Tabernacle from Exodus 25-26-27. Pi is found in the spiral of the double helix in your DNA. Consider King Josiah & the Prophetess Huldah rediscovering the scriptures, right? In short, this monumental oversight was corrected (ס) in 2015. What is next? ...Exodus 26:13 ≈ π...
Friedrich Nietzsche | The Greek State | Philosophers Explained | Stephen Hicks
57:51
Godzilla Attacks Brawl Stars!!!
00:39
Brawl Stars
Переглядів 4,8 млн
Thomas Kuhn: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
14:31
Then & Now
Переглядів 170 тис.
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Переглядів 5 млн
What is a Paradigm Shift? | Visualizing Thomas Kuhn’s Scientific Revolution
10:12
The New Enlightenment with Ashley
Переглядів 5 тис.
How to give a good scientific talk
4:37
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
Переглядів 106 тис.
Thomas Kuhn - Paradigms, Incommensurability and Kuhn Loss
11:28
The Living Philosophy
Переглядів 15 тис.