Three-phase power representations: abc frame, αβ frame and dq frame

  Переглядів 152,657

Prof. Pedro Almeida

Prof. Pedro Almeida

7 років тому

An introduction on the Clarke and Park transformations; static and rotating frames of reference; motor and grid-tie control of voltage-sourced converters.
NOTICE: the video doesn't contain audio from 11:49 beyond indeed (that's not an upload error). I added the figures for the control part only after I recorded. Thus, no audio indeed, just the figures.

КОМЕНТАРІ: 107
@PepperDeVillle
@PepperDeVillle 6 років тому
I have watched this video at least three times now. Thanks again. It is really helpful in my studies. I have to use dq control all the time for generator, motor, and inverter models.
@zaynaly3682
@zaynaly3682 5 років тому
Too Much Detailed practical approach in just 13 minutes !!!! You truly are AMAZING !!!!!!
@osamahaldhaifi7329
@osamahaldhaifi7329 3 роки тому
This has been incredibly beneficial. The mathematics was difficult to understand. I truly appreciate it. Thank you
@GeneralKiller1337
@GeneralKiller1337 4 роки тому
Ótima explicação, Pedro! Parabéns pela aula e pela clareza de suas ideias!
@arthurtasca4527
@arthurtasca4527 5 років тому
awesome video! it helped me a lot to understand both the transformations in just 20 minutes (i have to re-watch some parts to get them)! and keep doing your videos and English! I'm glad to see Brazilians talking about those topics, especially to a wider public.
@sylsyl490
@sylsyl490 7 років тому
This is so good! Thanks for the great explaination....!!!
@aravindhanharish7689
@aravindhanharish7689 5 років тому
Thanks for the video!!! It really helped me with the project. The slides and explanation was really good. Hoping for more videos.
@naeemuddinzia6774
@naeemuddinzia6774 5 років тому
it was extremely helpful in understanding clearly the concept of both transformations.. now they look so simple to me.. earlier i was struggling to make sense out of their complicated mathematics.
@Abdulghani-ub8fj
@Abdulghani-ub8fj 2 роки тому
This is the most informative tutorial I've ever seen, much appreciated
@Jotaruiz30
@Jotaruiz30 5 років тому
It's a difficult subject to understand, but you explain it very well, thank you
@er.sachidanandsah428
@er.sachidanandsah428 Рік тому
watched in a 0.75 playback speed and, anything is clear, thankyou for this video
@franckdjoumessi9788
@franckdjoumessi9788 10 місяців тому
The best dq-transformation's explanation ever.
@bubbly754
@bubbly754 6 років тому
Thank you for the very clear explanation.
@pollenbarua5450
@pollenbarua5450 5 місяців тому
incredibly good explanation with animation
@shalumail23
@shalumail23 5 років тому
Amazing work!!! Thanks a ton!
@asierugarte1749
@asierugarte1749 3 роки тому
Many thanks, so clearly explained, great professor
@piupiuhafner
@piupiuhafner 6 років тому
Explicação espetacular... parabéns...
@peterbelkin6702
@peterbelkin6702 2 роки тому
This is the best explanation I have ever seen!
@vineethgeorge1234
@vineethgeorge1234 4 роки тому
Awsome. ..i have been trying to understand how FOC works..Thanks a lot...Good job..
@felipedicler6031
@felipedicler6031 6 років тому
Very good explanation. Thank you!
@Zhaymoor
@Zhaymoor Місяць тому
They didn't make any sense to me before this video, Thank you
@eamonhannon1103
@eamonhannon1103 6 років тому
Very good . Thank you for making this video !
@pierreg.8456
@pierreg.8456 4 роки тому
Really nice explanations ! thank you !
@thekevin59
@thekevin59 6 років тому
Very good. This is a good way to learn.Congrats :)
@andyg.3509
@andyg.3509 5 років тому
Fantastic job. Thank you!
@jonatanrrz
@jonatanrrz 6 років тому
Parabéns pelo vídeo Pedro, ficou muito didático. Keep making videos like this one! Abraço
@jlleluc4s
@jlleluc4s 3 роки тому
Gostei da explicação. Me auxiliou nos estudos. Parabéns, continue assim!
@arumugaramprakashm7412
@arumugaramprakashm7412 6 років тому
Great Video & Nice Explanation
@kiranphalke24
@kiranphalke24 5 років тому
Great explanation✌thank you so much
@sebastianbergman1099
@sebastianbergman1099 6 років тому
Great explanation!
@EdnardoPereira
@EdnardoPereira 6 років тому
Ótima explicação! Parabéns!
@alirezapoulad883
@alirezapoulad883 6 років тому
Amazing video , Excellent , Thank YOU
@gabrielhomoly8981
@gabrielhomoly8981 9 днів тому
Very educational and useful
@jorgerive7335
@jorgerive7335 5 років тому
Excellent video, thank you. I can't seem to get the correct magnitude for the baby-blue vector v from the 3 phases. Shouldn't this just be the norm of the vector resulting from the vector sum of the 3-phases at a given angle?
@mehmetkarahanli191
@mehmetkarahanli191 3 роки тому
good work and good knoledge
@shahabuddin7262
@shahabuddin7262 3 роки тому
Great work
@sheikhjakirhossain3652
@sheikhjakirhossain3652 6 років тому
Very good explanation ...
@sumitabc1
@sumitabc1 5 років тому
great work sir
@JESUSVALDEZ-ee3kg
@JESUSVALDEZ-ee3kg 4 місяці тому
Muchas gracias, de verdad es muy buena la explicación, las animaciones fueron mas faciles de entender que las explicaciones en los libros
@hichemzahaf7292
@hichemzahaf7292 4 роки тому
very informative, thank you
@arthurenricocecidossantos1212
@arthurenricocecidossantos1212 2 роки тому
Muito legal o vídeo. Vê se você consegue me tirar uma dúvida que não acho em lugar nenhum: no referencial abc, a fase b está atrasada 120º da fase a, mas quando vai definir a transformada de Clarke a fase b é trocada de posição com a fase c. Sei que é possível manter a ordem original do referencial abc se orientar o eixo beta para baixo, o que dá a ele a característica de estar defasado -90º em relação ao eixo alpha. Não consigo encontrar em lugar algum o porquê dessa definição. Valeuu
@sebastianlunaalonso256
@sebastianlunaalonso256 6 років тому
Amazing video!
@andreyb7419
@andreyb7419 2 роки тому
Thx for this Clearly explaned topic!
@sairam3471
@sairam3471 5 років тому
Could you please tell me the software you have used to generate the 'GIFs' Clarke and Park transformations. I really like the way you did and I want use that software for my project. Thanks in advance
@majedhamdan6914
@majedhamdan6914 7 років тому
No sound after 11:49, otherwise, a great video. Thanks!
@hejhejwtf
@hejhejwtf 5 років тому
Great video! Thanks!
@prashantk3088
@prashantk3088 3 роки тому
thank u sir...explained so easily
@Barabass
@Barabass 6 років тому
@Pedro Almeida what are the chances of you uploading the video with complete sound? please do it, everyone is curious...
@nicolarosano
@nicolarosano 4 роки тому
Very good video. Congrats man
@MichaelWoodJ
@MichaelWoodJ 4 роки тому
Pretty good explanation
@alongkotphoosangad9882
@alongkotphoosangad9882 2 роки тому
thx a lot, I have earned more knowledge by this video
@bhanuprakashgundlapaneni4665
@bhanuprakashgundlapaneni4665 2 роки тому
Though graphics are disturbing, eventually this gives clear idea...thank you
@JakeRobertRead
@JakeRobertRead 6 років тому
yeah - a great help, thanks so much.
@Shorts-qg7jk
@Shorts-qg7jk 5 років тому
Very very helpful
@jjohnnychipanamachaca4700
@jjohnnychipanamachaca4700 3 роки тому
Espectacular
@ilkertalatcankutlucan3257
@ilkertalatcankutlucan3257 3 роки тому
@Pedro Almeida Starting from 5:03, I think you need to include the direction of the frame rotation. Assuming it is anti-clockwise, I believe you misplaced b and c phasors, correct me If ı am wrong.
@lukecurran1198
@lukecurran1198 Рік тому
thank you!!
@levuthi
@levuthi 3 роки тому
excellent
@6earth6
@6earth6 4 роки тому
Does anyone know what program did he use to draw the vectors??? any suggeestions?
@davidborbely3754
@davidborbely3754 4 роки тому
Big fat thank you!
@qqqqqq6686
@qqqqqq6686 5 років тому
If we add three signals(Va+Vb+Vc right part of screen)5:40 in every single part of time the result is 0. So how do we get resulting rotating vector v? ( from such thinking V should be equal 0, I miss the point)
@yahyanaderi690
@yahyanaderi690 4 роки тому
Thanks for the Explanation, but there might be some misunderstandings because of the vectors sum in 5:24 which is not correct, V should be bigger than Va, please revise it in the next version
@user-hs2co3we4o
@user-hs2co3we4o 6 років тому
Very good video but at 11:31 you have mixed the direct park and the inverse park. You have them flipped
@danielcosta5935
@danielcosta5935 5 років тому
Muito bom!!!! Mas já que o vídeo apresentou problema no áudio, faça um em português.
@PepperDeVillle
@PepperDeVillle 6 років тому
Thank you for you very helpful explanation. I noticed a typo at around the 11:15 mark. Your Park and inverse Park transforms should be flipped. You give Inverse Park first, but it is titled "Direct Park Transformation (alpha-beta to dq.)" Again, thank you for this video. It was very helpful for me to visualize the significance and purpose of Clark and Park in an EE context.
@PedroAlmeida0
@PedroAlmeida0 6 років тому
many thanks, i will correct in futures videos!
@ibrahemh.7674
@ibrahemh.7674 5 років тому
Thanks bro
@sooahtz
@sooahtz Рік тому
Hi, thank you for good explanation, I have a never-ending question, many people explains the conversion with Va Vb Vc, but in actual inverter system, we are measuring Ia Ib Ic with hall sensor or soemthing else, my curiosity is, should we convert Ia Ib and Ic into Va Vb Vc with R and L applied? please give me more understanding to get Vq in the end...
@PedroAlmeida-ys1sj
@PedroAlmeida-ys1sj Рік тому
No! To properly control the motor (speed/torque), you only need to feedback Ia, Ib & Ic plus information on the rotor position (which can be given by a position sensor - encoder, resolver, etc. or even can be derived from the back emf of the motor). The stator voltages are actually what the inverter is outputting to the machine, since Va = ma*VDC and ma (the modulation index at phase a) is the control output of the feedback loop - given currents Ia, Ib, Ic and rotor position, your controllers calculate what the modulation index should be at each phase to achieve the desired speed/torque (R & L are actually encapsulated in the dynamic model of the machine for control purposes).
@26manish26
@26manish26 7 років тому
thanks man
@MyTree
@MyTree 7 років тому
Massa, ta bem didático. In order to attend more people here I recommend to insert a subtitle in spanish, for example. And I assume it's easy for u as spanish apparently is the mother language in Brazil.
@pityjesus
@pityjesus 4 роки тому
Muito bom!
@aymenboujemel9597
@aymenboujemel9597 2 роки тому
Can anyone recommend a great book that expaain in boring details the svpwm please
@quentusential
@quentusential 3 роки тому
what about the non-synchronous rotor speed case. the rotor flux to stator flux angle is confusing me when the rotor doesnt move at synchronous speed
@tanarurvolgyi7507
@tanarurvolgyi7507 3 роки тому
There is not any flux made by the rotor, if it's angle shoudn't change regarded to the stators flux .Therefore "slip" (beetwen two axes ) must being present in assyncronous mode operation.
@fezaziomar9848
@fezaziomar9848 4 роки тому
Thank you sir, may we have your slide
@GabrielMoscardiPauka
@GabrielMoscardiPauka 6 років тому
Great video!! By the way, where did you got the animations?
@PedroAlmeida0
@PedroAlmeida0 6 років тому
i did most of them. some of them were made by a fellow professor (the phasor diagrams).
@PedroAlmeida0
@PedroAlmeida0 6 років тому
and some (such as the motor spining at the beggining) are from wikipedia
@pointercarrot3524
@pointercarrot3524 4 роки тому
@@PedroAlmeida0 Hi Almeida, what software do you use to make animations? It looks so great !
@abdessmadmilles1419
@abdessmadmilles1419 5 років тому
thanks
@millennialmindset3624
@millennialmindset3624 4 роки тому
So the d-axis and q-axis is used because it is possible to regulate the signals with a PI controller. That is interesting.
@abrahamrodriguez6462
@abrahamrodriguez6462 5 років тому
neat
@phasorsystems6873
@phasorsystems6873 5 років тому
Can anyone test this out and give feedback? Bump into: 'Circuit Solver' by Phasor Systems on Google Play.
@drewlilley829
@drewlilley829 6 років тому
Hero
@ZygmuntKiliszewski
@ZygmuntKiliszewski Рік тому
Hello Professor, these transformations are beautifully explained. Some matrix calculations include trigonometric functions. Good visualization. I invite you to analyze - a new generation - four-phase, four-step, synchronous Brushless Hybrid Fast - Rotation Motor. All data is published on my website and finally "Zygmunt Kiliszewski" on You Tube. Sincerely, Zygmunt Kiliszewski.
@zarzisrony4656
@zarzisrony4656 4 роки тому
Awesome !!! In 11:16 it is sine man! not Sen... :P
@williamprozac6165
@williamprozac6165 Рік тому
You can choose for one of the above gifts
@naveenreddy1010
@naveenreddy1010 4 роки тому
no audio
@Vibeland
@Vibeland 2 роки тому
Great video bro, if you could improve the sound could be even better
@otioti264
@otioti264 2 роки тому
Brasileiro falando inglês sempre soa parecido
@jinshikami7525
@jinshikami7525 4 роки тому
Having problems with circuits? Try circuit solver Find: 'Circuit Solver' by Phasor Systems on Google Play.
@naveenreddy1010
@naveenreddy1010 4 роки тому
but good video
@robertlake2753
@robertlake2753 4 роки тому
Verify your electrical circuits on the go! Spot: androidcircuitsolver/app.html
@agemennon
@agemennon 6 років тому
please stop the video at 5:08. At that moment , va = 1 and vb=vc=-1/2. Their sum must be equal to zero , but if you check the vectors, their sum is not equal to zero.I really do not understand how this vectorial representation represents the graphic on the right . I have been thinking about this for a long time , every book tells this same story ,but i cannot find a logical explanation.
@PedroAlmeida0
@PedroAlmeida0 6 років тому
their vector sum is not zero. you are doing the sums of their modules (amplitudes). their vector sum equals the space vector v, which has the same direction at this instant as phase va, because theta=0. this means that at instant theta=0, the space vector is aligned with phase a.
@agemennon
@agemennon 6 років тому
i_s=ia+ib * e^(j120)+ ic * e^(j240) , if you make a definition like this, their vector sum is not zero, of course. But, there does not such a voltage or current exist at the stator. What really exists is 0=ia+ib+ic.Stop the video at 5:08,check the graph on the right, you can see their sum is zero. The sum of vectors on the left is not zero. So,the graph on the left is not same the graph on the right. I think, we are trying to create this i_s current at the stator, to control the torque(quadrature part of i_s) and flux(diret part of i_s).
@qqqqqq6686
@qqqqqq6686 5 років тому
@@agemennon so why math does not fit with the real world? The rotor is rotating, we know that so ther emust be a V vector. why on the time scale sum of all phases are giving zero not V?
@rubeniraheta6067
@rubeniraheta6067 5 років тому
I think you may be confused with a space vector. It is very different from just adding the three vectors' amplitudes together.
@alvarogalan7116
@alvarogalan7116 5 років тому
hola
@shaileshchityala2787
@shaileshchityala2787 2 роки тому
Make previous videos in English Prof.. (Power Conversion)
@FoxD13
@FoxD13 6 років тому
oh my god, pls use fucking subtitles thanks
dq-axis theory
19:17
Design of photovoltaic systems
Переглядів 48 тис.
The Clarke and Park transformations (Episode 8)
9:03
Jantzen Lee
Переглядів 111 тис.
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 3 млн
0% Respect Moments 😥
00:27
LE FOOT EN VIDÉO
Переглядів 14 млн
Это было легко! Оживили и Отдаем BMW владельцу!
1:40:26
ИЛЬДАР АВТО-ПОДБОР
Переглядів 3,6 млн
Field Oriented Control of Induction Motors
12:32
Matan Pazi
Переглядів 11 тис.
Mod-01 Lec19 Three-to-Two Phase Transformation
51:49
nptelhrd
Переглядів 64 тис.
Motor Control, Part 4: Understanding Field-Oriented Control
10:30
What is the DQ0 Transform
11:03
HBK Electric Power Testing
Переглядів 3 тис.
Three-Phase Power Explained
9:58
Raritan
Переглядів 1,3 млн
We should use this amazing mechanism that's inside a grasshopper leg
19:19
Introduction to InstaSPIN™-BLDC Motor Control Solution
32:15
Texas Instruments
Переглядів 380 тис.
Clarke and Park Transformation - 1
1:49:39
ManKa Power Electronics
Переглядів 6 тис.
How does an Induction Motor work?
6:46
Lesics
Переглядів 5 млн
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 3 млн