Fogninis title.

Fabio Fognini

Djokovic Rafa's 8 year dominantion

Djokovic beat nadal..

Fognini moments

Goffin never was a bad sportsman, hes a real guy!

@@-music2023 not the mind set of a good competitive tennis player & Goffin definitely is a player that will fight for every ball for every point no matter what the situation.

A fraction of an inch!

Nadal surely knew his ball was out. Unfortunately, he did not display the same level of class as Goffin.

I agree, clay needs hawkeye. Figure it out.

Hawkeye should be mandatory at every ATP 250 or higher level tourney

Foxtenn’s real bounce worked pretty well on clay this year in Rio, so who knows we might see every clay tournament with them in the future

The problem with that is you can see the actual ball mark, so if hawkeye doesn't show the same mark then it gets confusing

@@tom0176devo what if the ball hits around the same area? And the balls can skid too

It was this year

RobertsonVFX that was foxtenn not hawkeye, it was supposed to be more accurate

LMAO. It was really historic though

?

It’s weird I had to skip past it to keep playing the video

No, ball was fully in.

草薙京 Me too… 日本からだと止まってしまうみたいですね

Except he couldn't , just like in AO 2012 Nadal couldn't.

He couldn't because of a robbed point, and it wasn't the point at the net.

@@natoskull2 which point was he robbef of?

@@natoskull2 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣please elaborate fellow djoker fan

@@saujatyamandal6846 I don't need to elaborate, videos are way better because images don't lie. Watch it for yourself m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/o5Gla36wn6Was2Q.html Minute 9:39 Robbery or what?

You're so wrong.

gautam As a Nadal fan, I have to agree.

French SF 2011 : Federer and Djokovic both in God Mode. Federer won.

@@911gpd and next year Djokovic easily win 3:0.

Without Nadal, Federer Could have won so mang FOs. Same may not be true for Djocovic. Djocovic lost to so many different players on clay even in his prime. Waarinka, Tsitsipas, Thiem, Federer, Ferrer, Berdych, Kolschrieber, Cechinato are the players who could able to defeat Djocovic at FO. Obviously Nadal is right in calling Federer better player on clay than Djocovic.

You double dipped the chip!

Specially the one vs Rafa.

Im guessing that Ramos-Vinolas got an easy call. Ace instead of fault.

@@santerikoho1579 It was actually an ace, they showed it on hawk eye in the extended clip. Edit: Sorry guys I thought it was in from memory, I didn't look it up.

Jonas Vinck i'm not good at english. could you explain more easily please?

@@jonasvinck3077 Why would you lie? It was out.

@@jonasvinck3077 it was out it doesn't matter if it hits the line if it touches the part of the line above/out of the square

If you don't think you can turn around a match in just ONE point, then you just don't know tennis at all...

@@natoskull2 It's not just one point but the fact that Goffin got so worked up and felt like it wasn't his day. Nadal is tough to beat without the help of the umpire

@@natoskull2 oh very well, idk tennis only...then according to u, only 1 point should be played by players to decide who has won it..plz understand what i have written first, rather than just jumping to critisize what i am saying

@@MineFullStop right...he was so worked up that he lost all concentration..and tennis is all about how u get back from that 1 point to back to ur level...and this all what matters...

Yeah,he has such high tone voice.

Haha LMAO

He wouldn't have won it anyway

@@Rohit-yb5nf That game was key for the set (and match). Once Rafa breaks you, there's no way back

@@6onxza Key for the set ? Maybe. Key for the match ? Definitely not.

@@Rohit-yb5nf So winning the first set in a match is not a key to victory? Confused.

@@MrsMaimim Not when you play against the God of Clay.

DjokerNole Cristi Not justified at all! Yes the ball was out, but it doesnt justify his behaviour. The ball was more obvious in Goffin’s case and he kept his cool, unlike Jared

@@etiennegauthier5378 i don't know if we should discuss grades of comparison. The ball was obviously out. Not comparing to the goffin situation. It is definitely irrelevant if it was more or less. The thing is the ball was clearly out. These players work a lot to get to this level. Not to mention costs, risks, sacrifices. It doesn't always pay out for every player. And to have an idiot like that referee and treat you like that is not acceptable. When i said "somehow justified" i meant about the whole situation. The aggressive part is not good, but then i put myself in his shoes. Having worked so hard to get there, you simply can't accept being mistreated like that. I am sure that donaldson later felt a bit bad by how aggressive he was. But in the heat of the moment, it was completely justified

DjokerNole Cristi Agree, in the heat of the moment things like that happen. But the way he went screaming face to face with the umpire, walking towards him like he was going to fight is for me unacceptable

I agree with you that he was right, but his reaction was that of a typically spoiled american brat. He was way out of line in the manner of his reaction, not the reason of it. The way he got so close to the empire's face means only one thing, and he almost lost it there. After that, the way he kept saying supervisor, supervisor, supervisor like a retard child just annoyed the hell of out me. It's the kind of tone that makes you want to crush his larynx with your boot :))

Are you serious?? Nadal is on the other part of the court,do you think is more easy to see the mark for the umpire who is in middle and high or Nadal who is that far away

@@superfanfff4542 funny how Novak never won the sportsmanship award yet he always acts better than Nadal in situations like these. it should be renamed to the Fedal award instead.

@@superfanfff4542 it was clearly visible that the ball was out. It was far away from the line. There was no way Nadal didn't know.

@@thenewguy7527 Listen, I really don't want to say Nadal's behaviour was right, but did you see Djokovic against Thiem at Roland Garros last year, that was everything but sportsmanship.

@@matthiaskralupper6598 Federer was no better.

Coffin did the right thing

The umpire didn't deserve it for his blatant wrong call, refusing to admit his mistake even when the mark is pretty clear.

@@arvindiyer6012 For sure the umpire made a mistake, does not mean you can't treat him like a human though. Shame on Goffin.

@@ryansodhi1815 😂😂 wouldn't call that morally the right thing

@@MasonCopper umpire after realising his mistake went with his ego...if u have played competitive tennis you would know losing a break point is how much critical & crucial for a match. I still admire how well goffin still behaved after that.

He actually told them to be quiet, which is as polite as it gets. Though I´d have loved him to say "shut up" since Djokovics parents are poisonous.

@@ferguson7128 yeah true.. The word "Shut up" will trigger the venomous fanbase of Novak.. Sadly still noone in my comment section😂😂

@@vijayendranvijay4538 what's sad is you fishing for a response. get a life son

@@bicyclethief hahaha yes I learnt this from Novak fans

Nadal probably knew that was out. After playing tennis for your entire life you get a feeling for which balls are in and which are out. This shot was way out.

wesb2410 “Nadal probably knew that was out” wishful thinking, gtfo

No he doesn't you tool

Check the h2h again!

Ma kakvi, Nadal ima otprilike 16-7 skor protiv Novaka na sljaci.

Last time I checked Nadal won 17 out of 24 contests on clay.

I like Nole as well, but facts are fact. The H2H on clay is 17-7 for Rafa.

完全にアウトですよね。それにしてもあんな判定をされてもあれほど冷静になれるゴファン凄い

@@yk595 Same.Hes such a nice gentleman.

@@user-ne7wo3pz7n Yeah,this is why he is popular with Japanese fans

5 set final

@@sergiosarmiento4371 you are right, my bad

@@nemanja9194 no worries

@/S_/H_/U_/K_/R_/A_/Y_/E / Stupid rafatards

They use the evidence from they clay, they don't use challenges on clay courts.

Edward Snowden you called Nadal “oVeRrAtE cLaYdAL” in another thread. Who gonna take your fraudturd or n0leturd ass seriously now ?

Baihaqi Firmansyah so who should be blamed ? A player who managed to lose focus after one play.

@@coloursoftherainbow8399 which would be fine if the clay wasn't littered with evidence

Nole by far, after Nadal.

@/S_/H_/U_/K_/R_/A_/Y_/E / lol Djokovic has won all Masters 1000 on clay, has more wins against Nadal on clay, and has beaten Nadal on Roland Garros, but ok

@@oscardiaz9170 if so, why he was unable to beat him until 2010 when rafa was a beast on clay?? And still he couldn't beat rafa in an RG final and took out rafa only in his worst year 2015..only Roger got to face peak rafa on clay..as usual, Novak taking advantage of past prime and injured players to get his records.. Shame🤣🤣

@@vijayendranvijay4538 LOL what a bunch of bad excuses together 😂😅🤣 Djokovic faced a prime Nadal in 2011 6 times and won all, including 2 times on clay. Djokovic beat peak nadal on Monte carlo 2013 finishing an 8 year run... Is it Djokovic's fault that Federer couldnt win all Masters 1000 on clay? 🤣😅😂 why didnt Federer took advantage from Nadal and Novaks injuries? 😂😅🤣

@@oscardiaz9170 it's true in 2011, Djoko was a beast, but he never met Nadal for years in a row final FO. If i'm not mistaken prime Fed met prime Nadal in finals FO 3 or 4 consecutive years.

уау)