In my book , JETSONE ONE takes the first place with gold cup award if I would give one .

Black fly seems to be the best compromise between cruising and economy. Closed cockpit is a big plus for noise reduction and being amphibious gives more flexibility.

I like the Jetson One also. It's like a flying motorcycle without wheels.

Jetson one hands down! Been following them for a while now! That demo of the speedster looked promising too!

I do really like the Jetson 1. For one you get longer flight out of it and for safety reasons it's not so closed in. It looks like it would be easier to get in and out of but then again the black fly will be reachable for the not so rich and its amphibious and also being closed in during them cold months will really be helpful. You know what I mean for the ones that ride motorcycles like me. That tilt straight up before flight don't sit well though.

I like the Blackfly!!! The capability to land on water and ground is a game changer for me!!!

The Denoginator is my fav , but The Aero Blender come in a close second .

So happy to see Baykar Tech. They're doing amazing things

If they can get 100 mile ranges out of these and a 8 to 10 hour full charge this can honestly be the future of transportation to and from work. It would take your job to provide the infrastructure for parking such a thing but come future times when personal vtol is pefercted and you see air highways that should be a normal thing. Exciting to see this technology gaining such innovation. Ill have to keep my eye out.

Nice overall summary on flying cars. We are making positive progress in getting consumers into the sky. The blackfly is great for rural areas, but the Jetson seems to be at the forefront. Great video!!!

Black Fly looks the safest, probably the best for winter weather, and most comfortable during all weather types... Jetson One is a toy that will create some hearing-loss lawsuits soon.

Jetson+Xturismo is the perfect mix for me

I dream about to get in fly-mode from the run. Thanks for the show.👍

The Jetson 1 design is the most practical and apt for improvement..

Amazing future, awesome aircrafts!

amazing cars.

In 1998, when I was a kid, I draw the concept of flying bicycle and I dream to implement it in my grandfather garage. I knew it becomes real some day. Here I am watching to this and remember my childhood.

Jetson one is my choice. It has the coolest look. Great visibility great toy to explore new territory with.

jetson one .. simple and clean

Category AA: Absolutely Amazing ✊💪

Wow , JETSONE ONE is my all time favourite design and functions , well done . If I had money , I would buy it . Impressive . Well done .

There are no crash videos here except russian Scorpion. It's unbelievable success, wow!

nice to see Franky Zapata still in the business.

The wing lift translates into higher range and efficiency. The enclosed space improves conform and protection while reducing noise. The propellers need to explore selecting or designing a sound reduction shape.

Jetson is a clear winner in my book, by being so open. Feeling of freedom would be my n#1 requirement. (Some would say safety, but, well.. there's "death eventually" written on all of them, so..)

Amazing

Phenomenal incredible flying machine 😅🎉 great thanks show more god bless 💯🤩🔥

Though it might drive the price up too high, black fly could use a gyroscopic seat for the pilot. Would look incredibly sci-fi as you get in and your seat automatically rotates so that you're upright and keeps you level while the rest of the vehicle tilts during takeoff. Could sell versions with and without the feature at different price points.

I like the Black flight over the jetson one. The fact it can float, it is enclosed is an advantage. I don't mind the take off either, it looks fun haha.

The Jetson 1 was the only one I saw I thought was worth the buy and even it isn't worth the price unless you can get a 1 hr flight out of it.

The black fly, gives you many more places to land, if need be, which equals safety.

The last drone look so safety for the beginners... 👍👍👍

Jetson one would be my choice simply because of the time in the air 40 minutes compared to 40 miles. Hopefully in the future they'll be able to lengthen it.

These toroidal blades are said to be 20% more efficient and 3 times quieter then those straight blades. Allows for greater flying time while using less power out of the battery.

i would love to have any of these,.... how AMAZING.

!!!!WELL IT'S ABOUT DAMN TIME!!!!

So far the Jetson One is my choice. it just looks like it would be more fun to drive.

So far, I like the Jetson 1. I think it has lots of room for improvement/advancements. The Blackfly, I'm afraid looks just too weird and intimidating for most people to consider purchasing, but we'll see. And...yes as many others here have observed, the Jetson 1 looks the least intimidating and most "conventional" of the offerings. The jet powered flying chair looks pretty cool, though. If they could somehow make it quieter and with a longer range, that would be cool. But, I would say the same for Jetson one as well.

Incredible job!

Love the last drone. Very genius!!

FANTÁSTICO QUIERO COMPRAR UNO 💫

For me, its the Blackfly...hands down!

Getting better

Blackfly, very innovative thinking

Blackfly because it can land in water. But I would like to see some design changes.

No doubt in my mind that Jetson looks and feel the best.

The Recon looks like the ultimate Zombie chopper!!! LOL

I'd go with the Jetson one! I was blown away by their first demo video! I can see those becoming competitive raving craft. Of course side by side would likely be too dangerous. But they could definitely set up a track course and race individually and the best time wins!

You forgot about mine, the SkySurfer Aircraft, it folds down into a box you can carry with you on a passenger plane and flies just as long as those.

thanks i was just thinking of what vehicle to use to go to school, now i can go to school with style

Jetson 1 visually is my favorite

Black fly.... The low vis high angle T.O. and landing looks fun... I've landed Cessnas at high angle ... It's definitely require more skill

My choise is Speeder with wings!

What a time to be alive

Betol2 is sophisticated, I hope this project will be implemented soon, so that later many people can handle it😅😂😊

Imagine those new round propellers that are way quieter and more efficient on the Jetson. I'd be all over it

The Heston 1 should only cost $20 to $30k. If they could mass produce it. I priced them out to build 2 years ago and it in material it costs $9,000, thats it. I was going to order batteries, engines and props, but realized I would be blindly ordering engines and batteries without knowing how much lift it produces. They upped the price of black fly because it is way to easy to fly and they don’t want people feeling the freedom of flight PERIOD. Anyone know where I can buy a design so I can build my own?

the wings, helping to save energy. Speed optimization can further increase range especially to those using wings. Quite a good competition isbout there. Thabks for the great video ❤

Amphibious choice of mine

Black fly is next level So far all I knew was jetson one. Both are so fine ❤

18:06 I hope he realizes how lucky he was to survive this

They are just all huge quadcopters 🙂🤙 well most of them v cool video I had no idea there were so many invented

As a teenager, back in the 60's & 70's I was curious to buy a 2 seat build yourself mini helicopter, cheap and easy to fly. Was called The Scorpion!

Ok could you make the wings solar paneled so your collecting a charge to the battery’s while in flight to extend your flight times?

JETSON ONE is the best design in my opinion...

I would make the jetracer dance in the sky 🤙🏼

Love the music 🎶

The Jetson one is the only option I fell in love with. The Blackfly is quite ugly and the Zapata feels more like a concept than a true vehicle.

The black fly is a more commercially viable prospect because of its amphibious ability I'm thinking. Charged by solar it can land almost anywhere zero pollution other than production cost. Could be a useful tool in many places around the world if given a chance bringing aid post even ferrying workers to and from hard to reach areas if they are cheap enough to buy and maintenance was relatively easy.

Very nice. Congratulations on being the first company to have success!!!

Good Video ❤

Мне очень понравилось ❤

Perhaps in Ukraine these vehicles would not require a license to pilot, but in the US, it won’t happen. Casual fans in the US may be under the illusion that because an electric quadcopter made big enough to carry a pilot and light enough to weigh under 254 lbs, therefore can be flown by anyone. False. The “no pilot license required” aircraft class is named “ultralight”, but it’s far from the only or only important criteria that defines it-and that is crucial. An “ultralight aircraft” must ALSO be capable of *with the power off* to still have controllable glide over 24 knots. A quadcopter has zero glide at any speed when the power is off. They have no kind of lift from the body or wings (like a plane) or still-spinning propellers (like a gyrocopter). Emergency parachutes don’t count. There is also the gray area of electric propulsion in any form of ultralight. It specifically says in the rules, that if these criteria cannot be met, then the general aviation rules now apply for both the inspection of the aircraft and the licensing requirements for the pilot.

Jetson, Blackfly and Xtourismo all looks ok.

All should have safety fenders around the blades.

You say "don't require a license," but that's untrue for most of these vehicles, if they'd be operated in the United States. Since that's where MOST of UKposts's audience is, that claim is basically fraudulent. If a vehicle doesn't meet FAA Title 14, Part 103 regulations (ultralight aircraft), you DO need an airworthiness certificate for the aircraft and a pilot's license for the operator.

“An affordable $98000” …sorry guys, I made a wrong turn somewhere. Better get back to my side of the internet

Good job dude!

farmers are going to love these

BlackFly needs to use the new toroidal propellers to be more efficient and quieter.

black fly

I’d go with the Black fly despite the extreme take off attitude. Seems more practical and safer than Jetson 1. I also like the way Black fly has room for more powerful motors.

Black fly for certain. Minimalistic functionality for price and reliability.

The black fly needs a 2 seater version. Absolutely stunning.

They're all garbage! Ludicrous, purposeless and laughably expensive. Flight times in single digits before having to return to one's point of departure. A two seat kit helicopter like the HeliSport CH-7 Kompress is a proven design which has been flown single Pilot from France to the USA and back! A real aircraft with an excellent pedigree, this helicopter is a genuine personal aircraft, which with the long range fuel tank has been hand flown for over 12 hours continuously. This is how it was able to fly from France to the USA, a duration only matched by massive passenger airliners! These pointless electric powered gimmicks keep appearing, but all have no practical purpose whatsoever, like the jet engine flight suits, pointless gimmicks with truly pathetic flight times and silly prices and ownership contracts. Edited for typo.

Going to have to get both

Les joy de télécommande chez zapata sont trop petit pour un feeling tranquille, ça demande trop de précision avec ces mini sticks, sinon son JET-POD est génial ! Ils ne peuvent pas exploiter des structures en carbon avec de l'hélium bloquer à l'intérieur, histoire de bien alléger l'ensemble ? Mes deux préférés, même si ce ne sont pas les plus efficients à cause du carburant : JETRACER, SPEEDER et le 3éme : JETSON ONE

BlackFly still appears to have the best planform for an EVTOL

I bought a drone for $300 with a Camera on it to give me the feeling of flying. Note: I thought that was Expensive. 🤷🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️ These look Amazing. I like the looks of the Jetson 1 overall. 😉👌

Waiting 9n the black fly....I'm in🔥

I like the Vince Wow human food processor vehicle. It dices and slices. Carbon fiber blades for easy clean up. Oh, look at little Tommy, he just lost an arm..

Zeva Z2 add toroidal props, widen the body for more lift, quadrouple the battery, and that should give an awesome speed snd range.

Amazing 👏

still like the jetson 1, Hopefully the design will change allowing a longer battery life 8 hours of flight and possibly four people ride in the future! I can't wait! :) If they can get it into a parking space would be perfect!

Credit: Joby Aviation After a long wait, the FAA has published its proposed airworthiness criteria for Joby Aviation’s JAS4-1, providing the first detailed look at the certification basis for an electric vertical-takeoff-and-landing (eVTOL) powered-lift aircraft. Eagerly awaited by the wider industry, the proposed airworthiness criteria were published in the Federal Register on Nov. 8, four years after Joby applied for type certification of its piloted four-passenger tiltprop and six months after the FAA changed course on certifying eVTOL aircraft. Joby was first to sign a G-1 certification basis with the FAA, in May 2020, under Part 23 regulations for fixed-wing airplanes. But in May this year, the FAA decided instead to certify eVTOLs as a special class of powered-lift aircraft under Part 21.17(b). Joby signed a revised G-1 in July. Because the JAS4-1 was not certified within three years, as required, the FAA approved Joby’s request for an extension and the date of the updated certification basis is June 2022. Joby is targeting approval by the end of 2024, but that could slip into 2025, when it plans to begin commercial service. The certification basis is largely based on Part 23 with Part 33 for engines and Part 35 for propellers, but includes new performance-based criteria developed by the FAA, “because no existing standard captured the powered-lift [aircraft’s] transitional flight modes,” the notice says. The proposed criteria include definitions specific to a powered-lift aircraft, such as flight modes, configurations and speeds, as well as electric engine and related propeller airworthiness standards. In the event of a loss of power, airplanes can glide and rotorcraft autorotate to a safe landing, but not all powered-lift aircraft have these capabilities. For the JAS4-1, the FAA proposes a unique definition for continued safe flight and landing, and for controlled emergency landing, to ensure the vehicle has performance equivalent to a glide or autorotation. For vertical takeoff and landing, the proposed airworthiness criteria are drawn from Parts 27 and 29 for rotorcraft, with changes to allow for safe operation of the powered-lift aircraft below the stall speed of the wing. The FAA has also developed proposed criteria to address the eVTOL’s alternating sources of lift: thrust-borne, semi-thrust-borne and wing-borne. Joby’s tiltprop design uses distributed electric propulsion to provide lift, thrust and control, which requires new airworthiness criteria to address the integrated flight and propulsion control system. Proposed criteria for distributed propulsion also address multi-engine isolation, simplified control and energy-system crashworthiness. Revised powerplant control criteria combine engine and propeller control as well as nacelle rotation. Fire-protection criteria delete requirements specific to liquid fuels but address all powerplant-related fire threats. Additional structural design criteria are required to address the aerodynamic loads on an eVTOL that transitions between vertical and forward flight, the FAA says. And because the JAS4-1 is expected to spend less time in hover than a rotorcraft, and more in high-speed flight, bird-strike risk is increased. The JAS4-1 also will be quieter than a helicopter, giving birds less warning, so the FAA is proposing a more comprehensive bird-strike requirement for an aircraft-level evaluation against a 1-kg (2.2-lb.) bird impact. The regulator also proposes a requirement for bird-deterrence devices to reduce strikes. Among the special features of the Joby propulsion system noted in the proposed criteria include the electric engine, which comprises four motors: the drive motor plus motors for propeller pitch, engine tilt and the cooling system. The propeller needs new criteria because the electric blade-pitch actuation is more extensively integrated into the aircraft’s propulsion and flight- control system. The proposed airworthiness criteria do not call out any obvious changes to the safety levels in Part 23 but require the aircraft to be capable of continued safe flight and landing following failures, including loss of thrust, not shown to be extremely improbable. In Part 23 aircraft, “extremely improbable” typically equates to a probability of catastrophic failure of 10-7 or 10-8. The FAA notes the JAS4-1 is not a Level 4 commuter-category aircraft, which would require the same 10-9 safety level as commercial aircraft. European SC-VTOL rules for eVTOLs specifically require a 10-9 safety level for commercial passenger operations

Jetson one oczywiście 😀

I like the "Flying Meat Grinder"!

Modern Technology ya gotta luv it. Now you can choose to drop from the sky or implode underwater at high pressure

Fantastic video! Thanks alot!

humour paired with A.I voice always gets me