Twenty-one proto-tanks and tank concepts that never made it to battle

  Переглядів 4,694,756

Lindybeige

Lindybeige

День тому

Signup for your FREE trial to The Great Courses Plus here: ow.ly/IAbV30qCbtN
Twenty-one proto-tanks or tank concepts that never made it to battle. Nice models, but some silly designs.
Support me on Patreon: / lindybeige
TV-8 image
By Source, Fair use, en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...
Buy the music - the music played at the end of my videos is now available here: lindybeige.bandcamp.com/track...
Buy tat (merch):
outloudmerch.com/collections/...
More videos here:
All Lindybeige: • All Lindybeige
Lindybeige: a channel of archaeology, ancient and medieval warfare, rants, swing dance, travelogues, evolution, and whatever else occurs to me to make.
▼ Follow me...
Twitter: / lindybeige I may have some drivel to contribute to the Twittersphere, plus you get notice of uploads.
Facebook: / lindybeige
My website:
www.LloydianAspects.co.uk
Channel page:
/ user "Lindybeige"

КОМЕНТАРІ: 5 400
@kamekase85
@kamekase85 3 роки тому
In defence of DaVinci, he usually drew all his schematics with inherent flaws if they should be stolen, he also wrote all note using mirror so that the text was inverted.
@peterknutsen3070
@peterknutsen3070 3 роки тому
In defence of Leonardo. His last name isn’t da Vinci. He didn’t have a last name.
@warc8us
@warc8us 3 роки тому
He knew how gears worked. I think he just had a sense of humor about it. I think your idea is correct, that it was intentionally wrong so that if someone stole the drawings and tried to build it, they'd end up with an embarrassing mistake.
@davideb.4290
@davideb.4290 3 роки тому
@@peterknutsen3070 da Vinci was used as last name. Many people in Italy had their place of birth as last name
@grayscribe1342
@grayscribe1342 3 роки тому
Talhoffer also had some designs that were very difficult to figure out even by modern scholars. It is thought that he used the strange angles and construction mistakes were on purpose. Anyone interested in his designs would still have to pay him for building them. I think the 'tank design' that is pushed by horses was by him and I would be careful to disregard the design. I don't think anyone would wish to challenge the front gun and the side guns (especially if you use small shot) will ensure the enemy will keep his distance. Sure, the horses are vulnerable, but you could use it to force a hole into the enemy formation and if you have it follow up with troops they could provide defense for the horses. He also had a design for a functional diving suit. It is thought that the plan was to get a spy or saboteur through a moat or cross a river among other possible uses.
@dereenaldoambun9158
@dereenaldoambun9158 3 роки тому
That's actually pretty clever. Ancient time password.
@NOVAFrederick
@NOVAFrederick 3 роки тому
The Ratte's size is stupid we know.... But c'mon,,, it looks badass. Who wouldn't want to blast a castle to smithereens with that.
@comrade-princesscelestia4907
@comrade-princesscelestia4907 3 роки тому
If I ever become a Billionaire, Imma make all the batshit crazy German Wunderwaffen from ww2
@sturmtruppen2353
@sturmtruppen2353 3 роки тому
Doctor Doom I don’t think a billion is gonna cut it
@fredygump5578
@fredygump5578 3 роки тому
You can test drive it in War Thunder. I've seen a video of it being "tested"....
@LS-sp5hr
@LS-sp5hr 3 роки тому
And 14 inch armor? Crew would be pretty safe
@ServantofBaal
@ServantofBaal 3 роки тому
It would be sitting at the bottom of a crater before getting in range, unfortunately. Artillery and bombers would have a field day with these
@Orious_Jekx
@Orious_Jekx 2 роки тому
17:25 * slaps wings on a tank * Russian engineers: Yeah, that seems about right
@Yutyrannid8705
@Yutyrannid8705 2 роки тому
That is a good idea though
@bullfrogboss8008
@bullfrogboss8008 2 роки тому
Am I the only one who read it with Russian accent?
@bewaffneterfrosch176
@bewaffneterfrosch176 2 роки тому
What about battleship with wings or aircraft carrier with wings? Pretty cool. Like mobile airport
@maxvyros432
@maxvyros432 2 роки тому
@@bewaffneterfrosch176 how about a carrier for aircraft carriers, things could have been massive
@bewaffneterfrosch176
@bewaffneterfrosch176 2 роки тому
@@maxvyros432 And on those carriers there will be planes :D
@RebornV3
@RebornV3 2 роки тому
at 14:04 "so how large do you want the front wheels to be" "Yes"
@IsseiRaine
@IsseiRaine 2 роки тому
"Yes"
@muhammadazim3374
@muhammadazim3374 2 роки тому
Tsar : Can i play with that model ?
@TheNumberOfTheSix
@TheNumberOfTheSix 3 роки тому
The idea of battle droids with a british accent is hilarious and I'll never forgive George Lucas for passing up on a wonderful opportunity
@davidwilson6577
@davidwilson6577 3 роки тому
This comment made me think of Robot Wars, then I got sad.
@envynemo4170
@envynemo4170 3 роки тому
What battletech??
@jimtaylor294
@jimtaylor294 3 роки тому
Bah. We Brit's are actually quite proud of our position of cinematic emminence in the portrayal of villainy. Usually the only other demographics for villains is Russian, German, or if desperate Texan or French.
@pwprochazka
@pwprochazka 3 роки тому
@@jimtaylor294 The British, German and Russian villains always drive a G-Wagon. Texan bad guy is in a Suburban and the French villains just wander around looking for a ride from someone.
@mrlucky5025
@mrlucky5025 3 роки тому
@@pwprochazka lmao Vastly under-rated comment.
@petersmythe6462
@petersmythe6462 3 роки тому
"The hull and turret could be separated for air transport." The turret looks like it could BE an air transport...
@GrimFaceHunter
@GrimFaceHunter 3 роки тому
It looks like those aerodynamic over the roof car storage's.
@Nerobyrne
@Nerobyrne 3 роки тому
reminds me of the galaxy-class battle cruisers from Star Trek ^^
@emptank
@emptank 3 роки тому
This clearly was meant to fight alongside the flying saucers the army was also researching at the time. The tank would drive up to the battlefield on its economic regular tank engine before the saucer section would lift off and fly into battle returning to hunker down in case nukes started flying or to refule.
@dereenaldoambun9158
@dereenaldoambun9158 3 роки тому
That idea is something like an inspiration for the HT-01B Magella Attack tank in MS Gundam 1979.
@AreGeeBee
@AreGeeBee 3 роки тому
@@dereenaldoambun9158 A man of culture, I see
@MazNator
@MazNator 2 роки тому
tzar tank might not've been great, but imagine being in the trenches. You look out and see a line of those thirty-foot-tall monstrosities rolling towards you. Jesus that would be terrifying.
@glitterboy2098
@glitterboy2098 Рік тому
i'm surprised they didn't try putting another set of the big wheels on the back. which seems like it would have resolved the mobility issue. still would have been a terrible tank though.
@The_whales
@The_whales Рік тому
Imagine seeing it in battlefield one, even tho it wasn’t in any offensives it would be cool (also for those wondering why I’m completely fine with this, it’s cause if the char c2)
@joeypaulzine3769
@joeypaulzine3769 11 місяців тому
that’s not scary that’s just confusing and kinda goofy
@Hanz13171
@Hanz13171 8 місяців тому
​@@joeypaulzine3769yea but it would of definitely been a morale breaker
@stephenbesley3177
@stephenbesley3177 Рік тому
Probably the nearest anyone came to armoured warfare in the pre industrial age may have been the Hussites with their protected wagons and horses that converted into mobile forts
@dirpyturtle69
@dirpyturtle69 Рік тому
They were definitely not the only ones to do that. War wagons pop up across multiple different civilizations throughout time
@evernewb2073
@evernewb2073 3 роки тому
funny thing about davinci's designs: he intentionally put critical flaws into nearly all of his sketches/renditions/etc because people were *CONSTANTLY* stealing his shit and quite frankly a lot of the stuff he came up with was stuff he never wanted to have actually built. the sucess rates of his actual prototypes and even a lot of the details in his artwork heavily support the idea that the majority of these critical issues were intentional. Tesla was pretty similar come to think of it, for exactly the same damned reason, eddison was quite literally the father of industrialized patent theft to the point where he managed to crowd out and outright kill off most of the thousands of other assholes hounding the area to steal anything trying to make it's way through the patent offices.
@jimodonnelly7762
@jimodonnelly7762 3 роки тому
Edison's on record for having more US patents than anyone else, but that's because he'd patent - under his name - anything invented by any of his employees, even if the idea was totally impractical, just in case somebody figured a way to use it. He still gets credit for things he didn't invent.
@evernewb2073
@evernewb2073 3 роки тому
@@jimodonnelly7762 and what most of his employees were doing was figuring out ways to make working prototypes of things that other people had tried to patent, or straight up hanging out at the patent office...though I'd imagine most of the literal mobsters working for him weren't on official payroll he also owned most of the newspapers in town and put them to good use.
@BierBart12
@BierBart12 3 роки тому
And now, 500 years later, people are finally smart enough to just be mildly annoyed by his intentional design flaws and fix them
@daleunsaque
@daleunsaque 3 роки тому
Then Otacon was right when designing REX with a "character flaw"...
@halotrixzdj
@halotrixzdj 3 роки тому
I came to say the same about Leo.
@ImLaminarBro
@ImLaminarBro 3 роки тому
"I'll be honest, that was a little bit weird"
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 3 роки тому
Tanks for sharing 📉😎📈
@drgud3900
@drgud3900 3 роки тому
TANKS
@lindybeige
@lindybeige 3 роки тому
I had never done one before, and can report that those who came to see me were all very pleasant and seemed to have a much better grasp of how to manage things than I did. No one outstayed his welcome, and it took me about an hour and a half to get through the queue. I now also have a nice lathe-turned wooden pull for my bathroom light-switch.
@andregon4366
@andregon4366 3 роки тому
@@JTA1961 I hate you.
@vojtechhoracek7704
@vojtechhoracek7704 2 роки тому
Let's squeeze no. 22 in there: 1420 and the Hussite war wagons. Technically a proto-APC really, but when equipped with a bunch of handheld guns or howitzers, they could also act as tanks in a defensive role.
@slydiogenes8796
@slydiogenes8796 2 роки тому
Except this video is about tanks that never made it to battle.
@retrowave69
@retrowave69 2 роки тому
but... they were actually used in battle. And effectively!
@SusCalvin
@SusCalvin 7 місяців тому
Warhammer Fantasy Battles took those things but GW decided they wanted them mobile. A WFB war wagon is a chariot, armoured horses pull the thing around and it smacks into people. The wagon is a higher platform where a motley crew with pistols, flails and spears can stab down on people. Being 80's Warhammer it is of course brightly coloured with lots of standards and insigna painted on.
@bigballzmcdrawz2921
@bigballzmcdrawz2921 2 роки тому
The Rattle looks like something straight out of Warhammer 40k.
@stefanaguinaldosoerensen2355
@stefanaguinaldosoerensen2355 3 роки тому
18:39 Imperial Guard engineers furiously taking notes
@TheHiyy
@TheHiyy 3 роки тому
(He's talking about the Baneblade)
@lastmanstanding5423
@lastmanstanding5423 2 роки тому
Praise To Omnissiah!
@MollymaukT
@MollymaukT 2 роки тому
To give you an idea how excessive the Ratte was, it was designed to be 35 m (115 ft) long while the Baneblade is "only" 13.5m (44ft) long
@HORRIOR1
@HORRIOR1 2 роки тому
@@MollymaukT Yeah but to be fair, there are tanks larger than Ratte in Imperium's army.
@almachizit3207
@almachizit3207 2 роки тому
@@HORRIOR1 not really, unless you're considering titans to be tanks. Imperial tanks only get slightly larger than the Baneblade.
@therealcarlxii
@therealcarlxii 3 роки тому
The Ratte would fit perfectly into the Warhammer 40k setting.
@InquisitorBoomBoom
@InquisitorBoomBoom 3 роки тому
Ratte already have Brethren in Imperium of Mankind.
@ethanblevins1116
@ethanblevins1116 3 роки тому
BANEBLAAAAADE!!!
@damienblock6998
@damienblock6998 3 роки тому
@@ethanblevins1116 I sense heresy!
@damienblock6998
@damienblock6998 3 роки тому
Warhammer 40k would have been perfect for the Ratte.
@HitandRyan
@HitandRyan 3 роки тому
Ready to unleash eleven barrels of hell!
@Yetipfote
@Yetipfote 2 роки тому
1:31 I like that they used the form of a aries as a ram because they watched nature and saw that aries always ram into stuff effectively. It is cute!
@Nantosuelta
@Nantosuelta Рік тому
This is probably one of the Lindybeige videos I've watched the most. There's just something about Lloyd critiquing ridiculous tank designs that never ceases to amuse me
@paulrdgers3914
@paulrdgers3914 3 роки тому
18:36 "Apocalypse Tank reporting for duty." "I am the apocalypse." ah red alert, the good ol' days.
@animarthur5297
@animarthur5297 3 роки тому
Laughs in Kirov
@bashitizingsmashmaster1155
@bashitizingsmashmaster1155 3 роки тому
I didn't have a girlfriend when I was a kid I had *COMMAND & CONQUER*
@door-to-doorhentaisalesman2978
@door-to-doorhentaisalesman2978 3 роки тому
"8 demi gods can't move Da Vinci's tank.." Ezio: Hold my wine.
@king.kthebest6158
@king.kthebest6158 3 роки тому
Maui: Hold my staff
@joaquinwithers722
@joaquinwithers722 3 роки тому
Nice name, I'll take your entire stock
@iarchive.9219
@iarchive.9219 3 роки тому
treeleaf_375 nah m8 i already bought em all.
@DraconianGhost
@DraconianGhost 3 роки тому
I see you everywhere... WHERE IS MY MERCHANDISE
@northernnugget
@northernnugget 3 роки тому
..is this an assassins creed reference? cant tell lmao
@glassramen
@glassramen 2 роки тому
@ 5:02 I would definitely interpret that as an indication that the cannon was able to swivel simply because it isn't drawn or colored like the rest of it. Besides, that'd be much more effective for such a design. I'd also like to make note of how similar it is to antiarmor guns from the past century. Maybe that's where they got the idea from, or it's just such a simple design that makes sense that it was only natural it'd reappear.
@chrisdooley6468
@chrisdooley6468 2 роки тому
A Lindybeige meet and greet is definitely on my bucket list lol. Informative video as always Lindy
@killdeer
@killdeer 3 роки тому
Little Wars is so wholesome. The idea that he invented this game to play with his kids and loved it so much they just kept expanding it and adding ideas. In parts he talks about how he needed more terrain so they acquired some handy pieces of lumber. Its really amazing for anyone who is a fan of war gaming.
@Anon26535
@Anon26535 2 роки тому
The question is, did Wells ever stat out the Tripods for it?
@dappertabby5126
@dappertabby5126 3 роки тому
I lost it as soon as he said “11 inch naval guns” while talking about a tank
@sabotabby3372
@sabotabby3372 3 роки тому
A tank was hit by a 14 inch AP round in the Korean War iirc
@kazivance3803
@kazivance3803 3 роки тому
@@sabotabby3372 source?
@lyndon4610
@lyndon4610 3 роки тому
less than a foot long guns in a 50 foot long giant german ratte
@andrewstrongman305
@andrewstrongman305 3 роки тому
@@lyndon4610 Seriously? 11 inches is the diameter of the bore. The guns themselves were 51 ft in length. The Ratte would have been 115 ft long. Perhaps Google stuff before you say something stupid?
@lyndon4610
@lyndon4610 3 роки тому
@@andrewstrongman305 I know, I was mocking it, WOOOOSH
@Anthropomorph
@Anthropomorph 2 роки тому
16:18 As a child I designed my own tank and it looked VERY similar to this, I feel really good about myself. Hahaha! Now I love your video buuuut on this particular tank? Unless those slits over the guns were added by the person who made the model, and the picture with the plans are made by someone other than the designer, It was designed to where you could see out of it. The tiny vertical slits above all of the cannons and guns were more than enough for someone to be able to see from especially considering the thing is basically two giant wheels. If a forward gunner needed to see something it would be nothing to stop and pivot left and right to pan the area, if the guns could not swing on their own, which honestly it does look like they could. Or even better serpentine until you sight something to shoot. Anything bigger than a slit on a tank is 5 alarm stupid when you actually have to have a person looking out of the literal HOLE in the tank... The only thing that would have honestly have been iffy, was the fact that it was gas tight..... Back then? Gas tight might have translated into AIR-TIGHT... and THAT might be a problem. Especially since I am willing to bet the engine heat alone might have made it unbearable.... Not to mention poor ventilation in the event of exhaust leaks. But who knows? Perhaps they would have worked all of that out? I wanna build one now.
@starzkream
@starzkream Рік тому
I absolutely LOVED this video. Thank you so much for making it!
@joshuasanchez2070
@joshuasanchez2070 3 роки тому
Engineers: so how big do you want your tank to be? Germans: Yes!
@CraftsmanShengCanweget10KSubs
@CraftsmanShengCanweget10KSubs 3 роки тому
they are actually would make it, at least one, that P1000 Landkreuzer is nothing to them, look at the ginormous ship they build , compare with the p1000 , the p1000 is a piece of cake , fortunately and unfortunately Albert Speer stopped them.
@HentiVentai
@HentiVentai 3 роки тому
Just imagine what kind of stuff will be built if the war lasted longer
@bluepro9846
@bluepro9846 3 роки тому
Ja! *laughts in german*
@aspopulvera9130
@aspopulvera9130 3 роки тому
I never get this joke still
@jimthesoundman8641
@jimthesoundman8641 3 роки тому
@@aspopulvera9130 I think the joke is, that the engineers would suggest a figure for how big the tank would be... 500 tons? 1000 tons? 2000 tons? and no matter what they asked, the germans would say YES! as there was no figure which was beyond them.
@The_Arctic_Kiwi
@The_Arctic_Kiwi 3 роки тому
Twenty-One Proto-Tanks is my favourite band.
@acomou3562
@acomou3562 3 роки тому
You would
@trapqueenaustin
@trapqueenaustin 2 роки тому
Mine two
@dangrf8216
@dangrf8216 2 роки тому
The title looks like a goreliaz cover
@shiaburex4697
@shiaburex4697 2 роки тому
Favorite*
@dangrf8216
@dangrf8216 2 роки тому
@@shiaburex4697 UKposts comment section *
@kalo_vera
@kalo_vera 2 роки тому
It's a shame the Ratte was so impractical It looks so cool 😔
@jackCollin403
@jackCollin403 8 місяців тому
Imagine if they somehow made it effective and usable.
@pizzaismine7307
@pizzaismine7307 6 місяців тому
Looks like a baneblade, I wonder where he got its inspiration from. Hmmmm
@esasuonborai2593
@esasuonborai2593 2 місяці тому
If it was finished the germans would lose the war faster..
@Nooziterp1
@Nooziterp1 2 роки тому
I love his sense of humour. It makes his videos informative and entertaining. Like that teacher at school who always put a little humour into his or her lessons that made them all the more interesting.
@T.V_boi
@T.V_boi 3 роки тому
"We just built the design for a tank with naval guns, 2 Maus cannons, and anti aircraft guns! Not to mention it has 14 inch armor!" "But does it work?" "What?"
@insomniacbritgaming1632
@insomniacbritgaming1632 2 роки тому
I think the Ratte was meant to use several engines... designed for battleships aa
@storeboughtpelmen3789
@storeboughtpelmen3789 2 роки тому
@@insomniacbritgaming1632 submarines if I recall correctly
@v_Shami
@v_Shami 2 роки тому
like a child's design of a tank
@patrickkeller2193
@patrickkeller2193 2 роки тому
It was a design meant to impress the man, which it did, but there were people smart enough to cancel his orders to actually build the thing.
@greatpower6063
@greatpower6063 Рік тому
Hey guys! I drew this, isn't it cool?- some guy in medieval europe.
@Loup-mx7yt
@Loup-mx7yt 3 роки тому
Mom help me, there is a weird British man in the house and he is talking to me about tanks and wants me to subscribe to the great courses plus!
@cubking0
@cubking0 3 роки тому
TANKS!!!
@Real_Zero_
@Real_Zero_ 3 роки тому
and TANKS!!!
@JesusFriedChrist
@JesusFriedChrist 3 роки тому
Yes but is a tank with a Bren superior to a tank with a Spandau?
@loafofbakedbread
@loafofbakedbread 3 роки тому
And also TANKS
@T0mmy7777
@T0mmy7777 3 роки тому
Dont forgot the TANKs
@KingofGeo
@KingofGeo 2 роки тому
Tank you for posting these!
@littlegrabbiZZ9PZA
@littlegrabbiZZ9PZA Рік тому
That "nuke-proof" concept reminds me of the turret of the more modern Merkava variants. Sloped armor gonna slope, I guess.
@dcmurphy5157
@dcmurphy5157 3 роки тому
4:10 this was intentional so nobody could just steal his design and sell it.
@zoolkhan
@zoolkhan 3 роки тому
same for the ratte - it was intentionally designed so large and heavy, no one would have been able to steal it
@merlinwimmer846
@merlinwimmer846 3 роки тому
@@zoolkhan it would have required a huge amount of resources, so no one would have been able to steel it
@johnjones5601
@johnjones5601 3 роки тому
I too came to clear da Vinci’s name, besides purposefully sabotaging his designs, he also learned to write upside down and backwards to keep his inventions safe
@MazaAzi
@MazaAzi 3 роки тому
in a world without patents, they made the thief suffer.
@fulalbatross
@fulalbatross 3 роки тому
@Ass Muncher We know he knew how gears work. We know he knew how to translate a design onto paper. We also know it was common practice at the time for any inventor to alter their schematics to trip up thieves and spies. To pretend we can't know anything true in this particular instance is, at best, pure denial.
@Jagonath
@Jagonath 3 роки тому
Lindybeige: This tank weighs over a thousand tonnes. It's not exactly stealthy. The enemy will just drop bombs on it. Baneblade crew: HEEEREEETIC!!
@rommdan2716
@rommdan2716 3 роки тому
Warhammer 40k have NOT realistic combat, otherwise all the armies would be using self-replicating drones with Animal AI
@FFKonoko
@FFKonoko 3 роки тому
@@rommdan2716 but Abominable Intelligence is heresy, they had a terminator situation in the past, so don't allow it. And most of their tech is lost. But hey, the tau use drones and such.
@kshatriya1414
@kshatriya1414 3 роки тому
Rommel Daniel Vidal Sotto Why use drones when you have humans from Hive worlds?
@stevenrith2386
@stevenrith2386 3 роки тому
@@kshatriya1414 but they still use ww1 tank designs in 41st millennium. what a joke ?
@rommdan2716
@rommdan2716 3 роки тому
@@FFKonoko Whit Animal AI you can have Trillions of Trillons of trillons more armies than with just fleshy humans
@jeffreycarman2185
@jeffreycarman2185 Рік тому
I thought that that orb-shaped tanks would be my favorite, but your saved the best for last. That DARPA tank is on point.
@somebod8703
@somebod8703 2 роки тому
6:25 This tank design lacks a plank for throwing spies into a sarlacc pit.
@gonk9315
@gonk9315 3 роки тому
5:44 *rips line of coke* "LETS PUT A FIRST RATE ON THE LAND" "wha-" "GIVE IT S P I K E S" "i don-" "ITS CREWED BY HORSES" "ludwig sto-" "IT NEEDS W I N D O W S" "its open topp-" "S P I K E S"
@joshuahmitchell873
@joshuahmitchell873 3 роки тому
Y E A H
@neitherman9997
@neitherman9997 3 роки тому
"AND GIVE IT EVEN MORE CANNON ! MORE CANNON EVERYWHERE"
@liamsteinhardt8634
@liamsteinhardt8634 3 роки тому
I like how two words of your name is german, but the word german isn't in german lol
@gonk9315
@gonk9315 3 роки тому
@@liamsteinhardt8634 close enuff xd
@gouverneur2001
@gouverneur2001 3 роки тому
@@gonk9315 It should also be Der Soldat considering it's a male noun.
@saintjohn6295
@saintjohn6295 3 роки тому
If you screw up your eyes, and squint... That Assyrian Siege Tower could very well pass for a certain Trojan Horse? Especially if you're writing about The 'Siege' of Troy, several hundred years after the fact. We all know how these authors love to embellish their tall tales?
@Hugh.Manatee
@Hugh.Manatee 3 роки тому
I really though it looked more like a wooden rabbit... Now where is my cowtapult?
@therandomham1403
@therandomham1403 3 роки тому
@Thelondonbadger Where the hell did you get semites from? They literally just talked about the Assyrians and the Greeks...
@juanmonsalvo95
@juanmonsalvo95 3 роки тому
@Thelondonbadger I didn`t know racists were blaming even the fall of troy on the jews, the joke tells itself
@Whalebarf
@Whalebarf 3 роки тому
​@Caleb OKAY He is being ironic...
@bo_392
@bo_392 3 роки тому
@Ryan Yarnevich choose a better avatar if you're going to troll cause you suck at it
@bubblezovlove7213
@bubblezovlove7213 2 роки тому
I really like your content Lindybiege. It's always so interesting....
@ricardomedeiros2505
@ricardomedeiros2505 Рік тому
First video I saw from you , and the TANKS part at the beginning was enough for me to subscribe 😂👍
@dannydont8942
@dannydont8942 3 роки тому
Could it be that HG Wells' design had such a tall roof so if any smoke was trapped inside it would rise?
@bartenz4307
@bartenz4307 3 роки тому
And being steam powered there would be a lot of heat to disapate.
@princecharon
@princecharon 3 роки тому
Maybe the roof was where the boiler or the main water-reservoir went, since it was steam-powered? Of course, I wouldn't want that over *my* head, but you've got to put it somewhere. Perhaps the steam engine was simply intended to be tall, and that required a tall roof.
@erikjarandson5458
@erikjarandson5458 3 роки тому
You may be right. Apparently, H. G. Wells was an avid cigar smoker... ;-)
@logicallion2196
@logicallion2196 3 роки тому
DAMNIT! I JUST COMMENTED THAT.... then saw this...
@comrade-princesscelestia4907
@comrade-princesscelestia4907 3 роки тому
@Joe Average What if its cold
@jamesdai9418
@jamesdai9418 3 роки тому
Leanardo's tank design included the flaw with the gears as a type of security against people copying his design, similar to how cartographers put roads that don't exist onto parts of their map so they can tell if someone copies their work
@sbybby
@sbybby 3 роки тому
@Garviel Loken You seriously under estimate the genius of the man. He did it to make it less likely that lesser minds would be able to take credit for his work, not to make it impossible to copy. It was like the OP said, cartographers would often place roads to nowhere to know if someone had just hardcopied their work. For the purpose of keeping secrets, he had brilliant ways of concealing his truly secret work (that which would have had him executed for being a heretic). His IQ was estimated to be approx 220, which is up there. He didn't make simple mechanical mistakes concerning the direction of gears.
@jeffhousen8968
@jeffhousen8968 3 роки тому
would any of his designs work without modifications?
@jamesdai9418
@jamesdai9418 3 роки тому
@@jeffhousen8968 I don't know all of his designs but at a quick glance, I would say likely not but I don't think he's famous in terms of engineering for practical designs, but just more for his vision. The concepts in his designs were things we couldn't realize with technology until the mid 20th century such as helicopters.
@jamesdai9418
@jamesdai9418 3 роки тому
@Garviel Loken I think that's fair, but I also don't think its something he would "accidentally" leave in his design like Lindy suggests. I think it does serve a purpose, maybe as a minor deterrent to your average Joe like Sebastian mentioned. This is highly theoretical but if he was smart enough, he could possibly have safeties against copyright that aren't obvious in the drawing, such as maybe he made the dimensions 2 times in all scales to make it too heavy to move or something, but my main point was just to say that I think Lindy gave him way too little credit.
@KevlarrTheBarbarian
@KevlarrTheBarbarian 3 роки тому
Maybe it was just a quick sketch as a concept he didn't fully think through.
@ronmailloux8655
@ronmailloux8655 2 роки тому
the always amusing and often informative LindyBeige
@jarniwoop
@jarniwoop Рік тому
#4 'I do like a tank with dormer windows. We don't see that enough.' I agree.
@NorthEevee
@NorthEevee 3 роки тому
Everyone: TONK Me seeing Dutch writing throughout the exhibition: _Wilhelmus intensifies_
@brushstroke2720
@brushstroke2720 3 роки тому
gekoloniseerd
@marcosnijder
@marcosnijder 3 роки тому
This exhibition was previously in Soesterberg, the Dutch National militairy museum had this on display.
@marcuszc3172
@marcuszc3172 3 роки тому
Heb ik dit gemist ? :-(
@steyn1775
@steyn1775 3 роки тому
*G E K O L O N I S E E R D!*
@artifex2.080
@artifex2.080 3 роки тому
*V E R W I J D E R K O K O S N O O T*
@patrikcath1025
@patrikcath1025 3 роки тому
"It has a turret with guns, so it was definitely a tank" **angry tank destroyer noises**
@mattjones2303
@mattjones2303 3 роки тому
Arguably though, tank destroyers aren't "tanks", they are better described as self propelled guns, such as mobile artillery are.
@vanukas8783
@vanukas8783 3 роки тому
@@mattjones2303 yeah no one cares
@agp11001
@agp11001 3 роки тому
@@vanukas8783 Well, everybody seriously interested in tanks does.
@vanukas8783
@vanukas8783 3 роки тому
@@agp11001 I dont. I assumed nobody cares because its basically just a cheaper alternative to tank. Unless its german.
@agp11001
@agp11001 3 роки тому
​@@vanukas8783 Yeah. that's basically like calling a bulldozer a tank because both have tracks. In other words: misleading and uninformed.
@DTSephiroth
@DTSephiroth 2 роки тому
ngl, when I heard that B-1 near the end say "we are a bit rubbish", I felt that.
@scouttroopermerc1506
@scouttroopermerc1506 3 роки тому
Ratte. Everyone: that's way to heavy. Me: what would the Imperium of Mankind think?
@jasoethesentienteyeshapedg4847
@jasoethesentienteyeshapedg4847 3 роки тому
BOLO MK.33: "Hey there, little brother."
@urbypilot2136
@urbypilot2136 3 роки тому
I was counting the barrels on the Ratte. I think it put the Baneblade to shame.
@bitterleafcastle1552
@bitterleafcastle1552 3 роки тому
@@urbypilot2136 Yeah, the Baneblade would literally be smaller than this thing, it's bloody hilarious
@steeljawX
@steeljawX 3 роки тому
And to think there's rumors/plans? bits a that have survived suggesting an even bigger armored SPG. The Landkreuzer P.1500 Monster. Basically a Railroad cannon on tracks. The 1500 is supposed to be it's tonnage as well I don't know where Germany was thinking they'd get anywhere near 800 tons of steel let alone 1200 tons (estimated that some 20 or so % of the total weight goes to the engine and components) to play around with.
@Zaprozhan
@Zaprozhan 3 роки тому
BANEBLADE!
@adamheywood113
@adamheywood113 3 роки тому
"Wheel move good" --"But what if wheel but men inside? Not be killed?" "Yes, better" --"But what if men but with weapons?" And thus, the *T A N K K*
@catarmour375
@catarmour375 3 роки тому
-“And what if give it wings, like bird?” “Better then.”
@michaelbuckers
@michaelbuckers 3 роки тому
T A N C C
@alexeysaranchev6118
@alexeysaranchev6118 3 роки тому
TONK
@sergioguerra7551
@sergioguerra7551 3 роки тому
Germans in 1916 chilling, when they hear a weird tractor noice coming from the British trench lines German: guess i’ll die
@joecat916
@joecat916 Рік тому
Da Vinche was quite intelligent. While giving a few pointers to inevitability, he also seems to project a humorous disdain for war. I 👾
@elcatrinc1996
@elcatrinc1996 2 роки тому
The editing of this video is amazing
@erickjericho6460
@erickjericho6460 3 роки тому
Honestly those tanks are useful "if" aircraft weren't invented
@mohamedyassinesedki1651
@mohamedyassinesedki1651 3 роки тому
Yep
@ER-bc6fs
@ER-bc6fs 3 роки тому
wasn’t*
@venteach.6289
@venteach.6289 3 роки тому
Weren’t*
@bernardi5919
@bernardi5919 3 роки тому
Would the AN-40 have been useful if aircraft weren't invented?
@mobydickies8135
@mobydickies8135 3 роки тому
The ratte would have been built
@ronanbarkus7801
@ronanbarkus7801 3 роки тому
I love how some British armor designs looks like they got ideas from kitchen wear
@kibukun
@kibukun 3 роки тому
Can't blame them. That's the closest they can have to a weapon let alone a knife.
@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681
@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 3 роки тому
Well, if you imagine some british nobles sitting in dinner table, discussing about better ways to fight a war, maybe the chief innovator being overly excited Graham Chapman, using soup bowls for helmets, with sauce dripping from his hair, and sending them away to designers to make weapons, you are probably ending with a historical document instead of comedy.
@mrmegahousefly
@mrmegahousefly 3 роки тому
Kenwood mixers were made by a man who was in a British armoured division.
@MrYfrank14
@MrYfrank14 3 роки тому
@@kibukun - they are allowed to defend themselves wth narwhal tusks, for now.
@Nox_Desiree
@Nox_Desiree 3 роки тому
Of course, when you need to hold a tea party on the go on the western front or the deserts pf north Africa why not have your equipment be glorified kitchenware. Efficient and fool proof if i say so myself.
@ahsanshadman1413
@ahsanshadman1413 Рік тому
Awesome ! Presenting serious information in such a funny way
@hueyiroquois3839
@hueyiroquois3839 2 роки тому
Tanks for another high quality video.
@sumvs5992
@sumvs5992 3 роки тому
Now I want to see an alt history movie about 17th century kingdoms fighting each other using horse drawn armoured personnel carriers, and dropping musket wielding soldiers into battle like modern war films.
@combobulous7044
@combobulous7044 3 роки тому
with Leonardo Da Vinci glider dive bombers and helicopters
@bugfighter5949
@bugfighter5949 3 роки тому
MY MANS, HAVE YOU HEARD OF THE HUSSITE WARS ?
@benjaminpont220
@benjaminpont220 3 роки тому
I 100% wanna see this, that’d be amazing
@elgostine
@elgostine 3 роки тому
also armed with revolving pistols and rifles which we did have (look up revolving flintlock and youll find originals from 1600)
@therakshasan8547
@therakshasan8547 3 роки тому
De Vinci would deliberately design failure in his drawing because sometimes the Sponsor would just steal the design and not pay him.
@Damian-cilr1
@Damian-cilr1 3 роки тому
true dat
@friedlyddw
@friedlyddw 3 роки тому
Good idea, il tell my math teacher i do that too to avoid people copying answers from me.
@AgentOrangeeeee
@AgentOrangeeeee 3 роки тому
@@friedlyddw Nerd
@friedlyddw
@friedlyddw 3 роки тому
It's a joke:
@friedlyddw
@friedlyddw 3 роки тому
I dont intentionally fail maths
@Copenhageninterpretation
@Copenhageninterpretation 2 роки тому
I feel like having a lot of cannons regardless if all were operational or possible to fire was more of a deterrent. Probably was purposely made to make enemies fear it.
@jassom1270
@jassom1270 2 роки тому
With the DaVinci tank. It’s not that the design was necessarily flawed, rather DaVinci is known for purposely putting “traps” in his blue prints. That way if his blue prints were ever stolen they couldn’t be used without the proper corrections being made.
@the_once-and-future_king.
@the_once-and-future_king. 3 роки тому
Everyone else: tries to make a viable war machine. America: Makes a tricycle, a hamster wheel and a ball. Yee-haw indeed.
@Attaxalotl
@Attaxalotl 2 роки тому
*_'Murica_*
@73_65
@73_65 2 роки тому
America then: Weird shit America now: Weird shit that (mostly)works
@thecolinman3448
@thecolinman3448 2 роки тому
yee haw indeed
@m4sherman926
@m4sherman926 2 роки тому
@@73_65 if it works it works
@Xick
@Xick 2 роки тому
To be fair, that one where they put a boat on top of a tractor looks like it could've been put together by four men in an afternoon for $1000, which is essentially the tank philosophy that won WW2.
@LaneLibra
@LaneLibra 3 роки тому
Whaaaaat? Another Lindy vid this soon!? What have we done to be so blessed!?
@REX-gq6ur
@REX-gq6ur 3 роки тому
I mean he's on par with womble but dang this is great.
@REX-gq6ur
@REX-gq6ur 3 роки тому
I mean he's on par with womble but dang this is great.
@LINKfromTHElegendOFz
@LINKfromTHElegendOFz 2 роки тому
Thinking about this, It really gives an idea where some Inspiration came from for Command & Conquer on The Vehicles, Like. The Mammoth Tank from the Soviets in C&C Red Alert - 18:36 The Buggy from the Brotherhood of NOD in Classic C&C - 21:51 At least these are what came to mind, watching this Video.
@whatscout78
@whatscout78 Рік тому
And also the landship fro Battlefield 1 13:45
@heatrayzvideo3007
@heatrayzvideo3007 Рік тому
Tanks for doing this
@tuppybrill4915
@tuppybrill4915 3 роки тому
3:30 “Open 2 3, Out 2 3, Bang 2 3, Bang 2 3, In 2 3, Shut Which quote turns up later in the video - sorry Lindy😔
@alfnoakes392
@alfnoakes392 3 роки тому
From Dads Army I believe, the squad 'firing' their guns through little ports in the side of Jones butchers lorry.
@DeDerpyDerp_
@DeDerpyDerp_ 3 роки тому
I think you ment 10:00 m8
@Brown-streak_studios
@Brown-streak_studios 3 роки тому
Lol dad’s army
@tattoo78ish
@tattoo78ish 3 роки тому
That will be from Dad's Army. At 10:04.
@Alex-cw3rz
@Alex-cw3rz 3 роки тому
10:04 love the Dads army reference 😂
@georgewilton6759
@georgewilton6759 3 роки тому
Yh that cracked me up to 😂👌
@t_k_blitz4837
@t_k_blitz4837 3 роки тому
DON’T PANIC!! *DON’T PANIC!!!!!*
@lukerettie
@lukerettie 3 роки тому
Don't tell him Pike!
@lindybeige
@lindybeige 3 роки тому
@@lukerettie Stupid boy.
@drbungholebob993
@drbungholebob993 3 роки тому
PUT THAT LIGHT OUT!!!!
@matthewrinehart2367
@matthewrinehart2367 2 роки тому
Love the commentary!
@FetterWaschbaer1994
@FetterWaschbaer1994 2 роки тому
I like his energy 😁 Nice video !
@ggilft4073
@ggilft4073 3 роки тому
Coming to World of Tanks in patch 2.0 along with wheeled artillery.
@sturmtruppen2353
@sturmtruppen2353 3 роки тому
In a game with no planes i think the ratte would fair well
@taloob493
@taloob493 3 роки тому
@@sturmtruppen2353 and also where tanks are dropped straight into battle with no consideration for logistics. Maybe this is what the Germans were planning for all along...
@jonathanhinchliffe672
@jonathanhinchliffe672 3 роки тому
@@taloob493 then again the nazi economy wasnt fairing well by the end so they wouldnt be able to spam gold ammo
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer 3 роки тому
War Thunder now introduces negative battle rank?
@commode7x
@commode7x 3 роки тому
I want to ride into the battlefield against a ratte with an armada of horse-drawn ballistas
@fitzroys5255
@fitzroys5255 3 роки тому
Lads, I think we are all dead and are in heaven
@danielsebestyen7955
@danielsebestyen7955 3 роки тому
Yeah two videos in two days. This is quite unusual.
@dermotrooney9584
@dermotrooney9584 3 роки тому
Yarp
@nathancox6249
@nathancox6249 Рік тому
Tanks for this
@AverageAlien
@AverageAlien Рік тому
everytime I see this video pop up in my recommended, I can't help myself, I have to rewatch it every single time
@fernandosalvador369
@fernandosalvador369 3 роки тому
5:15 Ah! Yes, the horse-traumatizer 500.
@Ypog_UA
@Ypog_UA 3 роки тому
"You wouldn't want to be next to a petrol tank with explosives flying around..." *britishgrenadiers.mp3*
@tacosloth613
@tacosloth613 3 роки тому
lol
@alfredomalich
@alfredomalich 3 роки тому
"You wouldn't want to be next to a petrol tank with explosives flying around..." agreed, but a steam engine is not really better when hit by explosives or even shrapnell of size. overheatet steam in a smal compartment is nasty stuff.
@kapjoteh
@kapjoteh 3 роки тому
alfredomalich congrats you have detected sarcasm
@TarotVylan
@TarotVylan 2 роки тому
TANKS for making this video
@BrenMurphy1
@BrenMurphy1 Рік тому
Tanks for sharing this, ♥️
@orev5035
@orev5035 3 роки тому
We're living in the unfortunate timeline wherein Ludwig's castle-tank idea never took off.
@paulgibert6390
@paulgibert6390 Рік тому
Mortal engine is merely a documentary in that universe
@northseaempireenjoyer6388
@northseaempireenjoyer6388 Рік тому
I prefer his Armoured Personnel Carrrier design more imo
@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 3 роки тому
World of tanks: *now this looks like a job for me*
@ArcticArmy
@ArcticArmy 3 роки тому
Yet none of these tanks have even remotely mentioned being added. Like 50% of the "tanks" here are pre-tank (What I mean by that is they were made before 1916, when the first tank was invented.) and the others are ridiculous. The only one that might even have a slight 000000.1% chance is the nuclear tank thingy. Its from the appropriate time and not a giant like the Ratte.
@geoffreyM2TW
@geoffreyM2TW 3 роки тому
I bet the German one with the ship cannons would become a very popular choice. On the other hand, Lindybeige forgot to mention the O-I, O-Ni, O-Ho, Type 4 and Type 5.
@MrPobanz
@MrPobanz 3 роки тому
@@geoffreyM2TW "Oho, was für ein toller Panzer das ist!" said the german engineer when taking a glance at some japanese heavy tank designs.
@derbe8647
@derbe8647 3 роки тому
@@MrPobanz Heureka! Welch ein Prachtexemplar von Panzerkraftwagen.
@manictiger
@manictiger 3 роки тому
Going into battle with a wooden tank would be awesome! (I'd survive as long as I usually do.)
@Rob-fy9iw
@Rob-fy9iw 2 роки тому
Aside from the great content (as usual) I love the Dad's Army reference thrown in!
@abigoreternal7537
@abigoreternal7537 2 роки тому
Tanks for the video!!
@luispt77
@luispt77 3 роки тому
Just imagine beeing in the Ratte's loo and the whole thing fires the navel guns. What a mess...
@Pablo-xy3lo
@Pablo-xy3lo 3 роки тому
Splash splash
@noahross6563
@noahross6563 3 роки тому
Spoken splash now I'm taking a bath.
@vipertwenty249
@vipertwenty249 3 роки тому
Never keep guns in your navel - if one goes off you won't be needing any sex change operation, it definitely would be a mess and it really isn't fun. Naval guns, on the other hand, are a whole different thing. Spelling is important sometimes.
@nickverbree
@nickverbree 3 роки тому
The lindybeige scholar's cradle reviews are amongst the best reasons to watch this channel
@TwilightsChapter13
@TwilightsChapter13 3 роки тому
I want to see a full video of him just reviewing Great Courses lecturers
@joshshields5921
@joshshields5921 2 роки тому
I'd love to get copies of the models. Whoever built them took a lot of time to get the details.
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 2 роки тому
Tanks for sharing... the ONLY & I say ONLY Channel I'll not fast-forward the commercial.
@JaysCoolThings
@JaysCoolThings 3 роки тому
22:00 looks like something the Combine would build
@armintor2826
@armintor2826 3 роки тому
Wow, it actualy really does
@christiancinnabars1402
@christiancinnabars1402 3 роки тому
It looks like a Combine APC that is missing its lower armor and missile launchers. The machine gun turret is even on the roof of the vehicle; albeit much further back.
@Reansensei111
@Reansensei111 3 роки тому
pick up that can!
@jimbob4240
@jimbob4240 3 роки тому
Lindy be like: yeah can I get a side of tanks with my tank make it extra armoured
@jeremyfeldmann7969
@jeremyfeldmann7969 3 роки тому
If i buy one can i get 2nd one half off
@apexinstinct
@apexinstinct 3 роки тому
@@jeremyfeldmann7969 Now your thinking like a true Soviet tank officer!
@SusCalvin
@SusCalvin 7 місяців тому
The idea of sloping "armour" was understood and implemented in the early modern period star forts. Their walls and other fortifcations where built with a bit of a slope instead of a wall to stand up against cannon shells better.
@Edddy929
@Edddy929 2 роки тому
Tank you for the information
@gododoof
@gododoof 3 роки тому
DARPA Ground-X looks like a vehicle the Combine would drive.
@mr.ooptoot4674
@mr.ooptoot4674 3 роки тому
True
@LordMekanicus
@LordMekanicus 3 роки тому
The suspension and driveline also looks similar to Halo's Warthog.
@Mate397
@Mate397 3 роки тому
17:25 that's a very scary sight, but also hilarious at the same time. The Ratte looks like it is straight out of 40k, about to crush heretics for the glory of the Emperor. Anyone got reminded of Command and Conquer when seeing the Darpa Ground X?
@ulric8445
@ulric8445 3 роки тому
y e s
@deltoroperdedor3166
@deltoroperdedor3166 3 роки тому
The Emperor protects!
@khorneflakes4446
@khorneflakes4446 3 роки тому
I mean, we already have the Baneblade superheavy tank.
@traceymacy
@traceymacy 2 роки тому
i really liked the design of the WW1 tanks with the tracks up and over ,(ie the mark V tank)
@Theironbodysensei
@Theironbodysensei 2 роки тому
That ship design was excellent with rear and front facing canons in a diamond shaped alignment. Those lower blades cut a lot of feet off
@zedmercury2605
@zedmercury2605 3 роки тому
14:06 The two giant wheels of the tsar tank oddly reminds me of that hail fire tank from the star wars prequels, Wonder if they took inspiration
@suclox12yearsago56
@suclox12yearsago56 3 роки тому
Yeah they did
@The_HangManofMidan
@The_HangManofMidan 3 роки тому
also the tumble weed tank reminds me of the one in BattleShip 2012
@daenor7807
@daenor7807 3 роки тому
This I agree with
@MikaelKKarlsson
@MikaelKKarlsson 3 роки тому
Announcer: Next up we have the classic Infantry Support G- Visitor: TANK!!!!! Whispering announcer: can we not invite that guy next year?
@raymondhamill8421
@raymondhamill8421 3 роки тому
I'll still be there next year. *TANK!*
@wesleythegreatgamer0943
@wesleythegreatgamer0943 2 роки тому
Tanks alot for this video
@4boatpeople
@4boatpeople Рік тому
luv ur videos, thank u very much!
@SuperExodian
@SuperExodian 3 роки тому
lol, the electric wheel reminds me of a warhammer skaven Doomwheel, which in the total war warhammer game basically functions like a cavalry/artilery piece
@weldonwin
@weldonwin 3 роки тому
Yes-Yes, is best Tank-Tank, Good-Kill Man-Things Yes-Yes!
@Balsiefen
@Balsiefen 3 роки тому
Honestly all of these would be excellent additions to Warhammer.
@weldonwin
@weldonwin 3 роки тому
@@Balsiefen Well, there are more than a few things in Warhammer and 40K that are inspired by these
@masterhand9305
@masterhand9305 3 роки тому
Ludwig's castle tank looks straight out of the Empire.
@dereenaldoambun9158
@dereenaldoambun9158 3 роки тому
And all of those wacky tanks are something that will be built by Ork in WH40K.
@antonioljubicic9420
@antonioljubicic9420 3 роки тому
4:18 there is theory that Da Vinci made wheels turn that way on purpose because he understood what such a powerful weapon could do. I don't think he screwed it up unintentionaly because he really was too smart to do such a silly mistake.
@guythatstillusespocketwatc3145
@guythatstillusespocketwatc3145 3 роки тому
Yes it's very possible
@danneeddi1995
@danneeddi1995 2 роки тому
6:55 I think this tanks purpose is not a mobile tank to be used during an assault, i think this is a mobile fortress. The spears could be removed when moving it to keep of the branches, and you could deploy it anywhere you like (well not in rought terrain) and then be used to keep of attackers or lessen numbers before they reach their real target.
@MisteriosGloriosos922
@MisteriosGloriosos922 2 роки тому
*Love your vids !! Liked and Subscribed*
@sirlionson2207
@sirlionson2207 3 роки тому
Drinking game: take a shot everytime he says "tanks"
@lindybeige
@lindybeige 3 роки тому
A sure road to alcohol poisoning.
@sjonnieplayfull5859
@sjonnieplayfull5859 3 роки тому
@@lindybeige im sure he can tank a lot.
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer 3 роки тому
Lindybeige one would need a veritable tank of alcohol. I’ll see myself out.
@raservesthedinner7620
@raservesthedinner7620 3 роки тому
@@lindybeige It would be enough for even water poisoning
@apocalypticsurvivor1881
@apocalypticsurvivor1881 3 роки тому
@@lindybeige sorry but I have to tell you that your video has 1 mistake. Some of the tanks where built, you even said it yourself. But it still is a great vidio and I enjoyed it. And now where I checked the title I feel a little stupid.
British Heavy Tanks of World War One
27:56
Lindybeige
Переглядів 482 тис.
One-man tank turrets - were they a good idea?
24:32
Lindybeige
Переглядів 1,1 млн
You’ve Never Seen A Race Like This 🚀
00:21
Red Bull
Переглядів 43 млн
ФОКУС С ЧИПСАМИ (секрет)
00:44
Masomka
Переглядів 3,7 млн
Muzzle Brakes - what are they for?
22:46
Lindybeige
Переглядів 3 млн
8 Epic Tank Battles
1:04:35
Yarnhub
Переглядів 1,6 млн
World War Two's most common tank
24:23
Lindybeige
Переглядів 223 тис.
Tanks of the Future
28:42
Lindybeige
Переглядів 1,2 млн
The Strangest Aircraft Ever Built: The Soviet Union's VVA-14
11:21
British Boomstick, the FV4005 | Cursed by Design
13:08
ConeOfArc
Переглядів 1,1 млн
Hetzer - a German mobile armoured coffin
19:16
Lindybeige
Переглядів 1,4 млн
A poor tank, a useless tank, and the worst tank in the world
8:50
Lindybeige
Переглядів 3,1 млн
Tanks! Monsters of the battlefield!
42:28
Simple History
Переглядів 716 тис.